User talk:Emijrp/2012

Archive: 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - See current talks here

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Good work!

Congratulations on the biography stubs you've created. If you're looking for more articles from other wikipedias to create I have a list of some here (mostly from the Portuguese Wikipedia). Keep up the good work.--Cattus ^talk 17:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words. emijrp (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Giovan Vettorio Soderini

Speedy deletion nomination of Giovan Vettorio Soderini

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Giovan Vettorio Soderini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. CaroleHenson (talk) 15:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Per the comments from you and another, it's good to know that the articles intend to be expanded. My misunderstanding. I just saw a lot of one-line articles on WP:AWBwith no context to show notability. I'm very glad to hear that they'll be expanded to give the reader some idea of who the person is and what they did!

By the way, I had no idea of your gender.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Sure, the history of Wikipedia has shown us that all articles are improved soon or later. You can see how the average bytes per article grows year after year. That is a fact. I don't think that my gender is important here. Best regards. emijrp (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah, that's good to know. I thought the comment on my page about "Violence against men" meant that you thought that you were being treated unfairly because you were a man.--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I changed the heading in my talk page (which I rarely do) because I thought it was an editorial comment that you felt victimized - and felt it was off-topic. If I'm understanding you correctly now (reading between the lines), you only added something to my talk page about working on Violence against Men. I wrote about violence against men in Domestic violence in the United States#Incidence of domestic violence and in Outline of domestic violence#Domestic violence against men and LGBT and Outline of domestic violence#Domestic violence against men and LGBT#Domestic violence dynamics between partners--CaroleHenson (talk) 09:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

avoiding speedy deletions

Hello.

When you create a new article that says

Michelangelo Ricci was an Italian mathematician.

without saying why he is notable, you risk having the article speedily deleted on the grounds that it lacks an assertion of notability. If you say

Michelangelo Ricci was an Italian mathematician who discovered a theorem that says.....

or something like that, then you avoid that danger. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Wholeheartedly agree!--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Francoist concentration camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valencia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:User:Emijrp/Systemic_bias/Contemporary_bias

Re:User:Emijrp/Systemic_bias/Contemporary_bias

"If we use that level of notability and completeness, from year 1 to year 2000 we would have 9000 * 2000 = 18,000,000 biographies. Currently we have only 728,971 biographies (4.05% of 18M)." - note that it is bad comparison, as population of world is increasing Bulwersator (talk) 12:26, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I think you are right (I'm not sure yet why I made that obvious error). We need to choose a notablity ratio. Looking at 1801-1900 years, in the lower ratio (right colum) we have 102.25 (~100) notable biographies per million people. In that case, there are 40,000 notable biographies of people from year 1 to 100 (and we currently only have 133). OK 40,000 >>> 133, but I guess that a lot of knowledge has been lost a long the ages. I think that in the 1st century there were a lot of singers, actors (theatre), athletes (Ancient Olympic Games are from 776 BC), etc, that today are utterly forgotten (due to lack or lost/destroyed sources). emijrp (talk) 12:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I agree in part, but your count is wrong because you only counted articles in categories by year. For the 1st century births, 70 biographies are in the parent category because exact date of birth is not known for those people. Additional 11 are in categories by decade.

As for the idea of completeness itself, I think a twofold reduction in notability ratio has to be taken into account. Apart from the smaller population, it was considerably more difficult to create records in those days. On average, only the most prominent individuals merited their deeds cast in stone (literally). So the same proportion of notable biographies cannot be realistically expected even to begin with, much less preserved until today. — Yerpo ^Eh? 10:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Emijrp. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

pl wiki

Hello

Can you tell me why there is nothing for pl.wiki in your tool? Pl.wiki have all images or its some error? PMG (talk) 12:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

See the statistics link. There were ~500 suggestions for pl: but they were completed. emijrp (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

How about for sl (used to be there)? --Sporti (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I will try to add it back. emijrp (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Balkh Provincial Museum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balkh Provincial Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balkh Provincial Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StarM 00:28, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Wanted you to have some official Wikimedia Stroopwafels as humble thanks for all the amazing things you do. I'm particularly fond of your All Human Knowledge page. I mentioned it in my little Prezi: http://prezi.com/szjdvdbtl0j_/is-wikipedia-done/ Ijon (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks man! Very cool presentation about Wikipedia coverage. I have added it to my subpage. emijrp (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Antonio Damirón

The article Antonio Damirón has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable person, coverage in the Spanish Wikipedia article is unsourced, can't find sources independent of subject to prove notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Bot adding wrong images

Hi! Picture File:Bengt Gabrielsson Oxenstierna.jpg is not depicting et:Bengt Gabrielsson Oxenstierna (1623–1702) (sv:Bengt Gabrielsson Oxenstierna, en:Bengt Gabrielsson Oxenstierna etc.), but his grandfather who had same name.--WooteleF (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I have added it to the exclusion list. Regards. emijrp (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Imagesforbio

Regarding filelink generated with "Add image to page" button, isn't "right" odd in code as images are right-justified by default anyways? Also, could it be possible for script to pick up localized variables, e.g "pisi" for "thumb" in Estonian Wikipedia? 193.40.10.181 (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

From it.wikipedia

Hi Emijrp. I am Italian and my English is terrible. I have a request for you. This page: [1] is the List of Wikipedians by number of edits but now is under maintenance. One day this page will be updated or not ? Thanks for your future answer. --Erik1991 (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Why you don't answer to me ??? --Erik1991 (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I have no time to fix that tool soon. Sorry. emijrp (talk) 22:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok thanks for the answer, I hope you have time in future =) Goodbye --Erik1991 (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. emijrp (talk) 10:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Rankings of areas of knowledge in Wikipedia

How do the various areas of knowledge rank—(1) in quality of information, and (2) in quantity of information—in Wikipedia articles? I am seeking more-precise information than what is provided at Wikipedia:Systemic bias. This two-part question can be answered according to any (one or more) of these classifications.

—Wavelength (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

To assess quality you can use the WikiProject templates rates (class-A, B, etc.), to assess quantity first you need to compile comprehensive lists of all the possible articles and then count red links. That's why I started User:Emijrp/All human knowledge. I think that quality is not possible without quantity. emijrp (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

ro:Wikipedia:Lista wikipediștilor după numărul de editări

Hi! I'm from rowiki and was told to talk to you on this matter. Last time this list was updated was more than three months ago. Can that be fixed? Thanks! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 21:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

wmchart updating stopped

Wmchart seems to be stopped renewing since Febuary 17,2012. It may need to be fixed. --Alexchris (talk) 15:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

es.Usuarios activos

Hi Emijrp, i'm have a question. ¿Why you not follow do [this chart? answer me in my talk, please. Regards. An user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.87.9.232 (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Bien de Interes

Gracias for the stubs. But can you add categories like those sub of Category:Buildings and structures in Spain by province. We ought to have categories for all the provinces and crammed with articles! See the categories for Palace of los Goyeneche (Illana)♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks! emijrp (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Church of San Salvador (Cifuentes) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cifuentes

Palace of Duke of Pastrana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pastrana

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Dead link in article 'Santa Cruz de Marchena'

Hi. The article 'Santa Cruz de Marchena' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://i1.dipalme.org/Servicios/Municipios/pueblos.nsf/santacruzdemarchena.html

You added this in July 2006.
The bot tested this link on 14 April, 16 April, 18 April and today, but it never worked.
This copy from the archives might be good.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 22:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Request

Hi Emijrp. Is it possible to restart your bot (BOTijo) on the Dutch Wikipedia? It stopped in November 2011, see here and here. Regards, Trijnstel_talk 21:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Done. emijrp (talk) 10:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Trijnstel_talk 21:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thai Film Archive

A tag has been placed on Thai Film Archive, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Paul_012 (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Also National Archives of Thailand. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

BOTijo on smaller Wikipedias

Thank you for fixing BOTijo! Could you enable it on the following wikis as well? vep, rue, kbd, xmf, lez, nso, ltg, pfl, gag, nv --Iketsi (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Julien Bertheau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julien Bertheau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julien Bertheau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TonyStarks (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your recent articles

Thanks for stubbing many new articles. Could you add talk pages templates (usually for WP:BIO and the relevant nation WikiProject)? See Talk:Herman Karl von Keyserling for an example of what I mean. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 21:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I think that it may be done using AWB. I will ask User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao. emijrp (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

I've been thinking it over. I think there's a way...at least to do two out of three (countries and bio). The parameters would be very rough, but that would be better than not at all, I think. So long as the talkpages remain redlinked. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

I'll try and start with it tonight, and do a chunk tomorrow. I don't know about Sunday, as I'll be out for much of the day; basically I'll do what I can when I'm able. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. NB: When transwikiying articles from the Polish Wikipedia, please take care to create them under their proper names. In Polish names of foreign people are often translated into Polish. E.g. Alexandre Charles Lanfant becomes Aleksander Karol Lanfant in Polish. On the English language Wikipedia we need to use the original namesthough. (or in rare cases an English version of the name). Travelbird (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks! emijrp (talk) 18:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

IranCensus2006

There are 30 files; numbered 00 through 29, all with the same url except those two digits. I'll unprotect for you. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

This is the second time they've moved things about there - we should probably create a wikisource for these files; I'll try to find a mirror. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

It's at internet archive (url is now in the template), select the November 2010 crawl. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

I see that you do a lot of technical things, y habla espanol tambien, perhaps you can create a wikisource from the 30 files? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you; I'll re-protect it now. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Noël Bernard (journalist)

Hi. I have no objection to the page move, but please note that, as a courtesy, you could consider fixing the broken links when you move a page - i.e. the links on Noël Bernard that should now lead to Noël Bernard (journalist). You can survey such breaks by clicking the "What links here" section of the toolbox. I took care of those links in this instance, but please accept this as advice for the future. Dahn (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

subst:

Hi if you use {{subst:PAGENAME}} where the name goes you can start them a lot quicker.. As long as you remove the brackets if the names are dabbed♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Agostina Pietrantoni

I've just created an article; Agostina Livia Pietrantoni and then found your stub Agostina Pietrantoni. Many apologies, I don't know how I missed your article, as I thought I had done a thorough search before I started. I used the full name as there were already a couple of redlinks for it. Anyway, should we make yours into a redirect? Alansplodge (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Agree. emijrp (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Notability of your articles

Most of your articles do not assert their notability and thus classify for deletion discussion. I know most if not all of them are notable, as I can follow the links to pl wiki, but please, to avoid wasting time of other editors who may nom the article for deletion, add a sentence explaining why this person is notable when you create an article. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 19:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand why you nom them for deletion when you say all are notable. emijrp (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Because too many sportsmen are not notable on en wiki, even if they have an article on pl wiki. While I can accept most others in good faith, those, I cannot. Anyway, you have not replied to my primary request. Either one, in fact, as I see you are still creating new articles without adding talk page template. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 21:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Adding talk page template is not mandatory. emijrp (talk) 05:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

No. But even if you don't care that you are thus making somebody else do it, thus wasting their time on finishing what you've started, there is the issue that lack of template prevents notification of deletion for associated WikiProjects, thus making it much more likely that your articles will be deleted. And currently most of them are ripe for that. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 16:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't waste the time of other people, they are not obligated to add the templates to talk pages if they don't want. The only individuals who are wasting valuable time and effort are you opening deletion discussions and those who are going to vote to delete notable articles. Because the articles will be re-created in the future again by others. It is the Wikipedia nature. emijrp (talk) 16:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, for people who do maintenance work like me, your articles are consistently triggering red flag. They make detecting real spam/hoaxes more difficult, because they look very much like them. In other words, your creations are flooding editors who usually review new articles and making their work more problematic, as you refuse to spend a little more time ensuring they don't look like spam/hoaxes. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 00:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Hell yeah. I'm creating dozens of hoaxes with 4 or 5 interwikis each one. Please, stop writing non-sense in my talk page. Thanks. emijrp (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Denis Bérardier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denis Bérardier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Bérardier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 22:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Édouard Delmont

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Édouard Delmont requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Connor2349 (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Do not worry about this -- just finish the translation, adjusting the links. I will explain the situation to the new editor who placed this notice. DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

David, that's the problem here - Emijrp is not in a habit of finishing the translations. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 01:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

so I saw--and therefore I did half of it myself, and mean to continue. I can't handle all languages and subjects, but I try to do at least a little it a situation like this. DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Washington Luís de Paulo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Washington Luís de Paulo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Luís de Paulo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 01:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Also, here's a mass nom of footballer substubs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicente Locaso. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 01:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

BOTijo

Hello. I see that your bot regulary update users statistic in Buryat Wikipedia. Can it do something like that in more active Lezgi Wikipedia?--Soul Train (talk) 23:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please stop unconstructive editing to Wikipedia. The one-sentence translations you are doing are not helpful--they cause more problems than they solve, for they either must be removed or other people must add to the contents. If you continue, this may well lead to a block from editing--we have enough of these to deal with already without your adding more of them. DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Some people think those stubs are OK, others (like you) think that are bad. Perhaps you need to discuss this in other place, and leave my user talk alone. Thanks. emijrp (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I too have also noticed that you have created 1,500 one sentence stubs this past week. Just to let you know, blocks have been handed out and it has been discussed many, many times before. The vast majority of editors believe this is wrong. There already is an AdD to delete some of your pages. They are not useful to anyone and I've already spent many hours doing talk pages for them. It appears you do not understand Polish as you have been adding incorrect categories and descriptions to the pages. I highly suggest you stop before this gets worse. Telling people to leave you alone is not helping. I'm know I'm the third editor to beg you to stop and won't be the last. Start adding a reference and add something more than "writer", "poet", or "translator" or please stop. Bgwhite (talk) 08:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm interested in those old discussion about deleting stubs and blocking creators. Please, provide some links. emijrp (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

(I may dig up some links later--it's in the AN/I archives, no doubt.) I see that you've been making stubs like Church of San Nicolás (Soria), and those are fine with me (I can't speak for Bgwhite or DGG) though it is really the absolute minimum. Barring, for the moment, the links, let me reiterate and agree with what DGG said: the mass creation of unreferenced stubs is highly disruptive and will lead to a block. I hope it will not go that far. FYI, it is entirely possible that other editors and admins disagree with me: DGG and I tend to fall on the "liberal" end of the scale when it comes to article creation, and we certainly don't speak for everyone--but I will not hesitate to block if this gets out of hand. Other, for instance, might not think that one single link to a database counts as properly sourced. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Just to reiterate what's above - that kind of article creation, as well as your attitude when someone brings it your attention, are not needed on here, and they will not be tolerated. Giant Snowman 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

This is the eternal inclusionism vs deletionism debate. I don't want my talk page is converted into an arena for that debate. So, if you have further comments, go to AN/I or open deletion discussions, and you will veriy that all the topics I created are notable. I'm still waiting for that stub deletion and creators blocking discussions archives. emijrp (talk) 13:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Meanwhile I'm doing all the work to save them.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't be discouraged. I know that the biographies you started are all mostly very notable. But you have to expect repercussions if you rapid fire stubs like I had. And AFDs and times of saving articles.. I'd say in biographies its more problematic because unlike a mountain or river or something a person needs some assertion as to who they were, even if the content is already there for the taking. I've said all along if me could get a bot to autogenerate articles from other wikis it would be a massive help but the problem is that google translate is not perfect and it would create a massive log of articles needing sorting out. At some point some manual editor is going to have to do the hard work on them. Your Spanish historic landmarks articles on the contrary provide a firm basis to build upon and are very useful even if stubby. I had a discussion with Aymatth2 and DGG a while back and we agreed that its best to create articles with one fact and source bare minimum. With the footballers:

Boris Arkadyev (Бори́с Андре́евич Арка́дьев) (1899–1986) was a Russian footballer and a coach. Clubs include Metallurg Moscow (1937–1939), Dinamo Moscow (1940–1944), CDSA Moscow (1944–1952), Lokomotiv Moscow (1953–1957 and 1963–1965), CSK MO Moscow (1958–1959), Neftyanık Baku (1961–1962), Paxtakor Tashkent (1967), Neftyanik Fergana (1968) and FC Shinnik Yaroslavl (1969).Source

That would be a great stub.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Here's the reason why it is non-constructive:

If you are making the entries at all, you must have a source for them at hand; I doubt you're doing them from memory. Even if you're just taking them from another WP, you at least have the article open and have some idea how to read the language. This puts you in a good position to write a decent paragraph & put in the reference. if it's from, say, the ruWP, and the source is, as it generally will be, in Russian, you can still just copy it over as it stands there. It will be easier for you to do them at once than for others to do them later.

so what you are doing, to save yourself transcribing a few lines, you're making other people first do the research and then do the lines--and it will often be a subject where relatively few other people can do it. So this puts an extreme burden on people like Dr B and myself, who want content, know how to get it, and can decipher a number of common languages. What you can do in an hour, would take us a day and there are not enough of us to go around cleaning up after you.

As I librarian, I expect to teach the freshman how to find a book on the shelves of my library; I expect the senior to have learned already, When it's something hard to find, the seniors will still need to ask me, but I have the time for them, because someone taught them the basics when they were Freshmen. If there's something difficult for you to do, I will gladly do it, but such basic stuff as this, I know perfectly well you have the ability to do it better than I can, for you are apt to be more familiar with both the subject and the language.

If you go on in this manner, you are inviting us to make a rule to stop you. It will be difficult to craft a rule without keeping out the newcomers. That's even more important, so I;'ll never support doing it.

But for someone doing a lot of it, then it becomes disruptive. And sub-par but borderline sort of work if done in large quantities is too much trouble to fix, and becomes disruptive. As Dr. Johnson put it in 1772, "any sin if persisted in will become heinous" DGG ( talk ) 18:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm disappointed Emirj that you've shown none of us any respect over this by refusing to discuss the articles. You have a great potential as an editor.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

To add my 2 cents... Emilio, I respect your work on Wikipedia in general and I still think that you're an asset for this project, but please be reasonable and don't alienate people that disagree with some part of what you do by refusing to discuss. The point is not whether people that you created pages about are notable at all or not - the reasons in deletion proposals are slightly misleading, because "notability" has a very specific and widely recognizable meaning in Wikipedia. Their main message is that there is no indication of notability, so this is actually not an inclusionism vs deletionism debate. The point is, that a page "John Doe is an [insert nation] [insert occupation]" is not a stub, nor is it an encyclopedic article. It may be marginally useful for the interwiki links, but for a visitor that doesn't understand anything but English, it is useless. Therefore, it needs a significant amount of work just to become a stub useful as a framework for further expansion. As Dr. Blofeld pud it, you create a significant amount of work for other people multiplied many-fold by semiautomatically creating pages with no real content. Because those subjects aren't generally known to English editors, there is a very limited number of editors with knowledge and time to transform them into stubs. In other words, your capacity of creating non-articles by far exceeds the capacity of the Wikipedia community of transforming them into something useful. Therefore, there is a proliferation of content with informational value close to zero that inflates article count without doing much else. In this regard, I agree very much with other people that posted here.

So again, please understand that we all have the same intention - building an encyclopedia and nobody will not think less of you if you accept constructive suggestions about your work, even if you disagree with them. On the contrary. Regards, — Yerpo ^Eh? 08:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Emijrp. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

User:Emijrp/External Links Ranking

I apologize for troubling you, but may I ask you to do the same for ruwiki, or may you give me the code (I'm a toolserver user too, but I'm not a coder at all)?

Thank you in advance! Lvova Anastasiya (talk) 08:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

fr Utilisateur:Emijrp/List of Wikipedians by number of edits

Hello Emijrp, could you please take some times to check the history of fr:Utilisateur:Emijrp/List of Wikipedians by number of edits. It seems that BOTijo update regularly the page as requested by each time MerlIwBot update the page just after in order to remove the same interwikis. Perhpas your bot automatically put a list of interwiki that should be updated ? --GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 07:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, my bot is using regex as described on Template:Bots when checking for edit permission. {{nobots|allow=...}} does not match, because according to the syntax nobots expects no parameters. You can use ether {{nobots}} or {{bots|allow=...}}. Merl issimo 01:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Mail sent: please respond at your earliest convenience

Hello, Emijrp. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

All_human_knowledge#Estimate_of_total_estimate

Replied here. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

sk:List of Wikipedians by number of edits – edit war with iw. bot

Hi Emijrp! Just one small issue regarding your great tool. Your bot seems to be replacing whole page content, based on a template, containing some frozen snapshot of interwiki links. This causes interwiki bots to update the page over-and-over each day after your edit (your edit, iw. bot edit, history). Would it be possible to always keep current version of interwiki list while replacing the rank table? Regards --Teslaton (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

A mesma situação na pt.wiki, talvez seja melhor encontrar outro sistema para os interwikis. Alchimista ^{talk with me} 14:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi,I can't find the source code of Best free Image?Can you give me ?

Can you give me ? I need it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwikia (talk • contribs) 15:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Your message

I'll look it over in a while. Thanks, Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Its OK enthusing about it from time to time but I'm of the opinion your time would be better spent working towards it creating sourced articles with content!! Anything you list on that page is only going to be a tiny outline of what really exists!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

If your interested you could help me create templates like Template:Casablanca for every world capital city in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Capital city templates.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Editcount

Hello, Emilio, this page (edit in it-wiki), is not properly updated. Today, June 3, 2012 at 6.02 in "my preferences" I have edit 153,547, compared to 152,539 calculated from the page of the bot. Hi, --Eumolpo (talk) 05:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

The same for me and for a lot of users --Erik1991 (talk) 07:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Probably due to replication lag on Toolserver. That happens from time to time. I can do little. emijrp (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

I think so too --Erik1991 (talk) 10:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruno Pradal

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Bruno Pradal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Great pic

great pic in Baldwin II, Count of Flanders really makes the article look nice! Mugginsx (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

alswiki

Hi Emijrp,

could you please update your "list of wikipedians by number of edits" also on alswiki: als:Benutzer:Emijrp/List of Wikipedians by number of edits and als:Benutzer:Emijrp/List of Wikipedians by number of edits_(bots included). Thank you very much. Regards, --Holder (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

And could you please do so on metawiki? It was most recently active on 15 February, see m:Special:Contributions/BOTijo. Thanks in advance. Trijnstel_talk 14:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

BOT operating in ca:wiki

Hi Emijrp: I do not know exactly what your bot is doing in ca:wiki. Recently in ca:wiki a bot, that it seems to be opperated by you, is creating pages in the mainspace that seems to belong at wikipedia space, or not. I'll rename to a subpage or userpage linked to the userbot pages as we usually do, and delete the mainspace name. I leave a list of the pages involved in, to have a personal record. C U.

Llista de viquipedistes per nombre d'edicions (http://ca.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Llista_de_viquipedistes_per_nombre_d%27edicions old URL) Llista de viquipedistes per nombre d'edicions/begin Llista de viquipedistes per nombre d'edicions/end Llista de viquipedistes per nombre d'edicions (bots inclosos) Llista de viquipedistes per nombre d'edicions (bots inclosos)/end

You can see this user subpages at here. --Bestiasonica (talk) 14:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

BOTijo on smaller Wikipedias

Could you enable BOTijo on the following Wikipedias? vep, rue, kbd, xmf, lez, nso, ltg, pfl, gag, nv --Iketsi (talk) 23:26, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

your BOT "BOTijo" in Arabic wikipdia

Hello Emilio , Could you please run your BOT "BOTijo" to update the page [2] , Thanks a lot ,Hatem Moushir (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

wmcharts revert chart updating

I notice that wmcharts haven't been updated since the 21st of June. I am new to them so I don't really know how it works. Do you just update them periodically? The reason I ask is that there has been a noticeable drop in the hit rate (reverts per edit looked at) of STiki recently. I think this is just because there are some new, very active editors. But I'd like to check the reverts chart to see if total number of reverts has gone up or down. Thanks Yaris678 (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Photo usage

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patos_Parque_Genovés,_Cádiz_2.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: emijrp with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Emijrp and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Sure, good luck! regards. emijrp (talk) 10:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Botijo on Esperanto wikipedia

Hallo, Emijrp. I just saw, that your bot Botijo created in June the new page eo:Listo de uzantoj laŭ redaktonombro instead of actualizing the page eo:Vikipedio:Listo de uzantoj laŭ redaktonombro. Could you correct this mistake, please? Thus, it forgot the namespace prefix Vikipedio:. Greetings --Tlustulimu (talk) 10:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Same for eo:Listo de uzantoj laŭ redaktonombro/begin, eo:Listo de uzantoj laŭ redaktonombro (inkluzivante robotojn), eo:Listo de uzantoj laŭ redaktonombro (inkluzivante robotojn)/begin (all need a Vikipedio prefix). If it's corrected yet, thanks! --KuboF (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Syria Files

In accordance with BRD, please discuss further changes/reverts so as not to edit wrar ;)Lihaas (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

[3], [4]. Now, you can engage in a edit war with the world, instead of me. Regards. emijrp (talk) 07:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Well if you think the lack of dicsussion is a waste of time then theres nt much i can do about it/. You opened it from the redirect while it was under constructions and was working on it (good), the same way i had the right too to ask about its notability and query that. Per BRD,dsicsussion should follow.Lihaas (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Syria Files barnstar

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Good job on keeping up with current events and making The Syria Files. It's this sort of promptness that really gives Wikipedia praise. Silver seren^C 00:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Your recent editing history at User talk:Lihaas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sudo Ghost 17:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Syria Files

On 20 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Syria Files, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that WikiLeaks' Syria Files showed relations that Finmeccanica and Brown Lloyd James had with Syrian authorities during the Syrian uprising? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Syria Files. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Saludos

Hola Emilio. Soy Niplos y vengo de la wiki española a pedirte un favor o que me redirijas a quien lo pueda hacer. Desde hace algún tiempo centro mi trabajo de editor en mejorar aquellos Top en los que puedo aportar. Pero creo importante actualizar los top, porque como sabes las tendencias cambian. ¿Podrías ayudarme ?( me parece importante hacerlo en un mes que sea significativo, desde luego no en Julio). Gracias.--95.120.192.128 (talk) 18:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect word on a statistics web page

Hello, it should say "their" instead of "her" - [5][6] Acoma Magic (talk) 20:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm referring to this sentence: "Not all users disclose her gender." Acoma Magic (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I was told this was the place to bring this error. Were they wrong? Acoma Magic (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I have a big backlog. Thanks for the fix. I have changed it in the code but not yet regenerated the graph pages (and don't know when I will restart the scripts). All my bots in Toolserver are not stopped. Regards. emijrp (talk) 22:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Bot malfunctioning

ro:Utilizator:BOTijo is malfunctioning on rowiki: instead of updating this list it adds interlinguals which are promptly removed by ro:Utilizator:MerlIwBot, in an endless loop. -- Victor Blacus (talk) 11:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I had overseen that message at the top. Sorry! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar, and I greatly appreciate your comments, but could I have an ordinary, non-Wikileaks-branded one instead, please? -- The Anome (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

I have changed it for a funier one, but related. Regards. emijrp (talk) 10:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Eduardo López Rivas

Hello Emijrp,

I have expanded Eduardo López Rivas article in English and I have completed the information needed. I am affraid I just took away by accident something important. I see that the photo dissapeared. I would appreciated very much if you can undo the last change which took away the photo. I cannot do it because I am not very good in these matters. The page would be then finished. Can you do that? Best, Isa--213.89.96.233 (talk) 21:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for expanding the article. Regards! emijrp (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Isa--213.89.96.233 (talk) 10:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Creating pages/Expand Spanish. Hi, Eimjrp, Eduardo López Rivas page is part of a complete research proyect that included several pages. It´s important to make them all in English. Otherwise is not worth because there are not good links. I would like to expand them if you are prepared to open the pages in the same way you did with López Rivas. I don´t know how to do it. Could you do that? We could start with an easy short one, "Teresa López Bustamante". Would it be possible? Best, Isa.

You don't need to request pages being opened, just create them. Write the title between brackets and follow the red link (Teresa López Bustamante) or write the title in the search box (right above) and start to write. For your example, you can translate the Spanish text. Regards. emijrp (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

No entendí nada! De todas maneras gracias por intentarlo. Isa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.96.233 (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Emilio, gracias por la respuesta. Te explico un poco: yo no soy editora de wikipedia y del sistema apenas manejo lo esencial. Soy investigadora y fui quien creo todas las páginas de esta dinastía. Sólo dos de ellas fueron creadas por otra persona, pero fui yo quien proporcioné el material y supervisé la información. Lo que yo deseo es poner todas las páginas en inglés, lo cual puedo hacer porque conozco bien la información. En cuanto vi que alguien (tú) había abierto la página de López Rivas para hacerla en inglés me puse a escribirla y en tres días la terminé.

Quizás yo pudiera abrir las páginas, pero tendrías que tener mucha paciencia explicándome porque no soy nada diestra en Wikipedia. Dime si tienes esa paciencia para volverme a explicar o si prefieres hacer con "Teresa López Bustamante" lo mismo que hiciste con López Rivas para que yo empiece a escribir en inglés.

Gracias por todo. Qué bueno contar con tu apoyo. Isa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.96.233 (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

You have a message in my talk page. Isa--213.89.96.233 (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

You have a message at the bottom of my user page!--213.89.96.233 (talk) 11:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi! New message on my page!--213.89.96.233 (talk) 10:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

!!You have a message at the bottom of my page!!--213.89.96.233 (talk) 11:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

You have a message about French pages in my talk page! Isa--213.89.96.233 (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

You have a new message in my page. Isa--213.89.96.233 (talk) 09:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Look at my page. New message!!--213.89.96.233 (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Short articles

Hi Emijrp. I noticed the article Eddy Meeùs which is only linked from Compagnie des Alpes. It's an extremely short article and I doubt its usefulness like this, so I would like to have it either expanded or deleted. I was looking at some more of your contributions and notices a few more short articles like Church of Saint Paul, Mirabello (also an orphan) or Charles A. Halbert Public Library. While I am an "inclusionist", I would prefer to have longer articles or at least articles that are not orphaned. Thank you, SPQRobin (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Urdu Wikipedia Users List

Dear Emilo, [[7]]

There is a page with the users list according to the number of edits on Urdu Wiki. Page is not updated since long. Your name is mentioned as user on the page, may be it is a bot work.

Can you help or advice how to update the page.

--Tahir Mahmood 14:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear Emilo,

List of Wikipedians by number of edits is not update since June. Below is the link for the Urdu Wikipedia. Can you please update of tell me how to update the list. [[8]]

--Tahir Mahmood 08:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahir mq (talk • contribs) talk —Preceding undated comment added 08:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php

http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php
dos't work with the Internet Explorer, the graphics do not display.
Benutzer-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3; Tablet PC 2.0)


Meldung: 'window.G_vmlCanvasManager' ist Null oder kein Objekt
Zeile: 698
Zeichen: 17
Code: 0
URI: http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/modules/jquery.flot.js

--Atamari (talk) 22:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to fix this without changing the graphs library... emijrp (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Add Ghana to this tool. Thx. Przykuta (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Added! Regards emijrp (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Links with non ASCII characters are broken. Could you please finx it? Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm aware of this bug, I will try to fix it. Regardss emijrp (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the great stats you provide ! --ManfredK (talk) 21:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Glad to hear that. emijrp (talk)

Webcitation

Please visist Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/BOTijo_10, there are outstanding issues there that were never addressed. LeadSongDog come howl! 04:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Request expired long time ago. I was tired of so much tests and tests and tests. emijrp (talk) 06:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Question about map

Hi Emijrp!

First of all, thank you for creating your WLM maps—the map was invaluable for us and we are using it on our website (http://www.wlm.org.il) now.

I have a couple questions:

A few of the monuments appear to be in the middle of the sea on the map, i.e. the location is clearly incorrect, even though the coordinates are correct. Are you aware of any issues like that? What could be the cause? An example is the monument 4-4000-004 on the Israeli map.
It appears that the upload link on the map sends the coordinates to Commons but not the description (please correct me if I'm wrong). Is there a way to also make it send a description?

Thanks in advance, —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 10:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi! The monuments in the sea were bad coordinates and looks like someone fixed them. About the descriptions I can't do much, perhaps a bot may copy the descriptions using the monument ID? Regards! emijrp (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Emijrp/List of Wikipedians by number of edits

Hi there. Could you please update this list please - http://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%83%D1%88%D1%8B_%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D2%9B%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%83%D1%8B:Emijrp/List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits

Would be great. Sursh (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

One million new species of sea life

The discovery of one million new species of sea life has been reported.

Tara Research Vessel Discovers One Million New Species Of Microscopic Sea Life (PICTURES)

—Wavelength (talk) 23:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Can you add it to the AHK page? emijrp (talk) 08:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

I prefer to avoid editing in the user space of other editors, except their talk pages, and in this case, you are more familiar with the layout of that page. (By the way, for several months I have thought of suggesting that you either copy it or move it to "Wikipedia:All human knowledge". It can have the shortcut "WP:AHK".)

—Wavelength (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Collections Care

There is a new WikiProject Wikipedia:WikiProject Collections Care, whose aim is "to encourage professionals and other individuals interested in all fields containing collections in need of preservation".
—Wavelength (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. emijrp (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Graph of revert data

This graph looks interesting but it is out of date (and I have to assume it is 2012). Are you able to create a graph of this type where the user can put in their own time frame? Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Next update

Hello. I would like to ask when will be the next update of el:Χρήστης:Emijrp/List of Wikipedians by number of edits (greek wikipedia). Xaris333 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Editcounter update

Hi Emilio! Could we please (if possible) get a Christmas update of your List of Wikipedians by number of edits? --Otets (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)