User talk:Illegitimate Barrister/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seabees In World War II, CWS Flame throwers[edit]

Good day to you.

You offer to help so I will take you up on that , thank you.

The Seabees in World War II article appears to have been created as a college project. It also appears that that orginal work was entirely cut and paste copy. I posted that on the article talkpage. I did a quick paraphrase of each paragraph and cited what I thought the source was. Two sections are basically my effort, the CWS and Seabee legacy. For some reason the CWS section became the focus of another editor. After I would added content they would re-edit it. Over and over. In looking at what they had done something stood. They had changed RADM(Rear-Admiral) to Admiral several times. I left a message that some of their edits could be taken as vandalism as a RADM is a O-7 pay grade and an ADM is an O-10 and they are not inter-changable.

OMG- that was a mistake. They have tagged footnote 24 as {unverifiable} when it states exactly what it is referenced for (see date 24 October 1944). I had written that the CWS Flame Tank Group was "top secret'. The other editor completely removed that saying it was not true as there was nothing in the source saying "top secret. Footnote 29: count down 21 lines and you will read "top secret".[1]

This same editor stated that my first effort at paraphrasing was not good enough. There is another OMG. I went back and put more effort into that and that was a mistake too.

My opinion is that if their edits were not vandalism to start they certainly are now. This is not what I am on Wikipedia for and I have no clue how to deal with it. I do not want to waste my time correcting what this editor has done if they are going to do it again. Your help when you have time, please. Thank you.Mcb133aco (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If ref 24 is "Issue 20, 16 May 1944, Seabee News Service, Budocks, p. 1", the reason why they tagged it as unverifiable might be because it's lacking a URL to an online-hosted version. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your time and explanation. Have to admit it is beyond me. The ref is posted online and is a U.S. Gov publication. That flies in my book. Thank you again.Mcb133aco (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure you're right and that it's a legitimate source, but reference citations on Wikipedia have to be verifiable. If you can find a website online that has that page of the book on it and post that link onto the refence on the article, then that should suffice. Best, Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BoweBergdahl.png[edit]

Notice

The file File:BoweBergdahl.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Overton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cottingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Rear Admiral (lower half)[edit]

The name correction you made for the rank is not correct. The uniformed services has always had lower half in parenthesizes. It has never been a comma. The rank has also been established by statute. See 10 U.S.C. § 8111 and 37 U.S.C. § 201. Neovu79 (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a waste. What do they do with the upper half? EEng 02:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll answer this question on your talk page, as it is quite long. :) Neovu79 (talk) 03:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected, feel free to revert it if you haven't already. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 08:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Flags at the White House[edit]

On 2 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flags at the White House, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Serbian flag was flown from the White House in 1918? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flags at the White House. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Flags at the White House), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox templates - Disruptive editing[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You copied code from a sub template Template:Infobox country/imagetable of Template:Infobox country and applied that to the following infoboxes:

Any changes to this sub template would be only be tested for that particular Infobox in its sandbox. If the code was changed this might affect other infoboxes using it. Infoboxes should have their own specific code written for that particular infobox. Code from other sub templates shouldn't be copied.

The code you included was written for two flag |image_flag= |image_flag2= parameters and a coat of arms/symbol parameter |image_coat= |image_symbol=. Infobox law enforcement agency already had a parameter for a flag |flag= and all images had a default image size. Infobox fire department already had a parameter for a flag |flag=.

Infobox national military uses Template:WPMILHIST Infobox style with has specific styles for images. The template already has a parameter that is used for flags |image= and a second image parameter |image2= which can be used if there are two images such as a symbol or logo. An shown by your edit to Namibian Defence Force in which you changed the flag from |image= to |image_flag= and your edit to Czechoslovak Army in which you change the logo image from |image= to |image_symbol=.

You didn't attempt to seek consensus on talk pages before making changes with a rationale for the changes. @MSGJ: outlined what you should have attempted when you requested an edit to Template:Infobox organization. The edit summaries don't contain a brief rationale for editing the template code. You didn't update the documentation subpages of the infoboxes WP:TDOC for the changes.

I commented on the Infobox law enforcement agency talk page 3 months ago about your edits to that template regarding issues with using a subtemplate from another infobox it was then Template:Infobox settlement/columns. I didn't ping you properly so you may not have read the talk page comment. FOX 52 roll backed your edit and advised you on your talk page. I advised you that FOX 52 had also roll backed at the same time a similar edit to infobox fire department.--Melbguy05 (talk) 22:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Revert edits to infoboxes following editing of infobox templates[edit]

Please revert all your editing to infobox image parameters in articles following changing the infobox templates (as discussed here on your talk page) and revert the infobox template code. You had an opportunity to revert the Mongolian Armed Forces following reading the talk page.--Melbguy05 (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What's the problem with it? If those edits bother you that much you can go and revert them yourself (I won't object), it's not like those articles are locked or protected. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 19:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Infoboxes[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Melbguy05 (talk) 12:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template space force help[edit]

Currently  United States Space Force displays the U.S. flag. I’ve got no clue on how to change it to the SF flag itself. Would happen to know how to make it work? Garuda28 (talk) 12:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have to add this: | flag alias-space force = Flag of the United States Space Force.jpg into: Template:Country data United States. Now I'd go ahead do it myself, but unfortunately the template is locked so I can't. An administrator has to do it. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 13:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Got it - I’ll post a request on the talk page. Thank you! Garuda28 (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Melbguy05 (talk) 08:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Complaint about your edits: please respond at WP:AN[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister. Please see WP:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Illegitimate Barrister no response to ANI disruptive editing. If you want to continue to edit templates, you should be willing to respond when problems are pointed out to you. Are you planning to ignore the whole thing? I'm looking forward to your reply at WP:AN. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what there is to say or do; it seems the "disruptive" edits in question were reverted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 17:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Please don't ignore this[edit]

Illegitimate Barrister, we need to know if your behavior is going to continue. Administrators have the ability to issue partial blocks, so that for example, if you won't accept any feedback about your template editing, you can be *blocked* from editing templates. If you want to avoid that outcome, you should consider responding seriously. For details, see all the posts you have removed from this page since early May. EdJohnston (talk) 18:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your candor; I haven't done any of the "disruptive" edits since the objections were raised earlier this month, so I think that speaks for itself. Regards, – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 19:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:New York Times, May 24, 2020 cover.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New York Times, May 24, 2020 cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 3#File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 3#File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox Change for the U.S. Coast Guard and it's Predecessor[edit]

I was wondering if you would be interested in weighing in and giving an opinion on this Talk:United States Revenue Cutter Service#Infobox_change. Neovu79 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what I could do to sway it, the consensus there seems fairly clear. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 23:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The NATO Hymn[edit]

On 19 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The NATO Hymn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NATO has its own anthem? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The NATO Hymn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The NATO Hymn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Centre of Muslims - Invite[edit]


Non-free rationale for File:New York Times, May 24, 2020 cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:New York Times, May 24, 2020 cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just notifying you of this as a courtesy. Another editor has replaced the PD license you added with a non-free one, but the file now needs a non-free use rationale for it to avoid being deleted per WP:F6. The file's still being discussed at FFD; so, there's still time to comment if you want to clarify something. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Flag copyright question[edit]

Hi, do you know how a flag design from 1896 can still be under copyright? See File:Knoxville TN Flag.gif. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 04:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An 1896 U.S. work is in the public domain; pretty much all 19th century U.S. works are in the public domain due to age. On top of that, the flag's creator died in 1925, so it's in the public domain doubly, due to the age of the work and sufficient post-author death time having passed (80 years in this case). – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I thought. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 04:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Went ahead and uploaded it to the Wikimedia Commons (here). – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Iraq?[edit]

Was Iraq from 2003-2004 called the Coalition Provisional Authority or the Iraqi Republic after Saddam was removed? ColorfulSmoke (talk) 07:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding was it was called the "Iraqi Republic" until the 2005 constitution changed the name to "Republic of Iraq". The CPA's founding charter, in "Section 2", states that Iraqi laws in force at the time of its establishment (c. April 16, 2003 (2003-04-16)) remained in force unless otherwise nullified by the CPA, so I take that to mean the name of the country remained unchanged. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 11:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ColorfulSmoke, the Coalition Provisional Authority was the government of the Iraqi Republic (2003–2004), as government of the United States is an article distinct from United States. wbm1058 (talk) 23:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


August 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm IceWelder. An edit that you recently made to Lego Loco seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! IceWelder [✉] 08:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Bank Gothic[edit]

Gah, what a mess! Hit rollback by mistake and kept reverting to the wrong version-my apologies. Very sorry about that. I hope it's in the version you intended now. Blythwood (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

S'all good brah. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 23:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Template:US enlisted ranks[edit]

Looks like there needs to be a consensus for this. I would greatly appreciate your input, for or against. :) Neovu79 (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus as to what exactly? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's a stupid argument over what "color" the Army ranks should be. You don't have to chime in if you don't want to. I was just reaching out to to get a consensus on it. Thanks. Neovu79 (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see. How about OCP ranks instead? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Disruptive editing" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Disruptive editing. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Disruptive editing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sysages (talk | contribs) 01:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Threatened with a ban for linking Ireland to Ireland (state)[edit]

The Canterburry editor did the above to me leaving me messages to that effect. If you take a look at my edit history, I’m not even very active or particularly repeat though I certainly have done that before. Is this not completely outrageous? Is there no longer any decent bunch of editors who push back against this sort of bully boy stuff? I don’t edit as much as I used to, in no small part because of the likes of this. Anyway, it’s incrediible that the ArbCom thingy is being interpreted as a license to insist on all links to the state being to a descriptoin of the state. Needless to say, the end result is that ignorance of what the state’s name actually is will persist. Frenchmalawi (talk) 03:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What context were the links? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the context of the link, as you'll note it's actually changing a link to Republic of Ireland to link to Ireland (state), not changing Ireland to Ireland (state). Basically Frenchmalawi keeps altering links that link directly to the article Republic of Ireland to instead link to Ireland (state) which is just a redirect back to Republic of Ireland. This has been a pattern of editing for many years, they've raised discussions about moving the Republic of Ireland article to Ireland (state) and it's been declined on that article's talk page, so these aren't edits made out of ignorance, they're changes based on knowing how the article structure is set up. They've been asked to stop altering direct links to be redirects on several occasions, however Frenchmalawi continues to keep altering direct links to be redirects from their favoured title (which of course just directs back to Republic of Ireland.) I have put forward that this is pure pointy and disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 12:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm with ya. Direct links shouldn't be changed to a redirect. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 13:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Birthday![edit]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naval Air Station Pensacola shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seaman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy Pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


"History of the Democrats" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect History of the Democrats. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 3#History of the Democrats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


SVG file question[edit]

Hi IB, could you look at File:Flag of Mississippi "New Magnolia Flag".svg? There seems to be an issue in the file, as I'm unable to load the image into a specific editor program (Boxy SVG). I am able to load the second version of the file, and I can load it into Inkscape. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a new version. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll check it out now. BilCat (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It still doesn't open in Boxy, it just shows a blank file. I'll just have to use Inkscape for this file. Thanks anyway. BilCat (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was able to do what I needed with Inkscape. Your tweaks were good, so at least that's improved now. Thanks again! BilCat (talk) 23:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help please ...[edit]

Hello IB...I have for the first time in ages created a new article. I am requesting your assistance in finding a photograph of USRC Pamlico (1907) and somehow with your magic uploading that photograph to the article. You have always managed to do this for me in the past and I haven't a clue as to the mechanics involved. Thanking you for your efforts and there is no time limit involved. I hope you have been well with the COVID thing and all is good. Cheers... Cuprum17 (talk) 18:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done! – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the work on Pamlico, that was quick. I could use some more picture help on USRC Boutwell (1873) if your are of a mind. Cuprum17 (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also thanking you again...you are my hero! Cuprum17 (talk) 04:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Iraqi national anthem, 1981–2003.ogg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Former Iraqi national anthem, 1981–2003.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc () 01:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC) Wikiacc () 01:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


New Page Patrol December Newsletter[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.gif[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


New York Flag Smiling Sun[edit]

You put an image on the "coat of arms of new york" page, without the "smiling sun". I think all suns are supposed to have faces in heraldry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldwidewebb77 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Flag of Nicaragua (1908-1971)[edit]

A post-1971 Nicaraguan flag is anachronistically seen in the list of sovereign states in the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. These seven decades should have this flag File:Flag of Nicaragua (1908–1971).svg

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 10:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed them. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 15:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nicaragua-flag 1968 Summer Olympics[edit]

A post-1971 Nicaraguan flag is shown in Nicaragua at the 1968 Summer Olympics.

In 1968, Nicaragua would've have this flag, File:Flag of Nicaragua (1908–1971).svg

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Cuba (1902–1959).svg[edit]

Did pre communist Cuba have a bright version of the Cuban flag before 1959. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Here's a 1952 flag and it uses bright blue. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Flag of Liechtenstein[edit]

Please add,

File:Flag of Liechtenstein (1921-1937).svg in list of sovereign states in the 1930s.

and

File:Flag of Liechtenstein (1937-1982).svg in list of sovereign states in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 08:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 09:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Kristoffer Domeij[edit]

On 10 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kristoffer Domeij, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kristoffer Domeij (pictured) set a record when he died after 14 tours of duty in more than 10 years as a Special Operations Ranger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kristoffer Domeij. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kristoffer Domeij), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template data Saint Lucia[edit]

Hello! Can you replace the flags of Saint Lucia from 1875 until 1939 and from 1939 until 1967. Saint Lucia had flags for these two variants and not Yours sincerely, Sondre --80.212.169.236 (talk) 10:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a file of the flag available? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 17:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Flag of Italy[edit]

Please add File:Flag of Italy (1946–2003).svg in list of sovereign states in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 2000s. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 06:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you do it? The page isn't protected or anything. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sean Nava[edit]

Information icon Hello, Illegitimate Barrister. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sean Nava, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Flag of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


July 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anett Kontaveit, you may be blocked from editing. Klõps (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

FU? Please be civil! Everybody knows that Soviet Union did not exist in 1995. Be careful and do not make such edits anymore. This is a case of serious vandalism.Klõps (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my apologies. I misread '95 as '85; terribly sorry. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 06:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Userscript for moving files[edit]

I noticed you move files manually without updating the filenames in articles. As updating filenames is a drag I created LuckyRename some time ago, you may want to give it a try. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 11:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


MfD nomination of TimedText:Guatemala's national anthem, performed by the U.S. Navy Band.ogg.en.srt[edit]

TimedText:Guatemala's national anthem, performed by the U.S. Navy Band.ogg.en.srt, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/TimedText:Guatemala's national anthem, performed by the U.S. Navy Band.ogg.en.srt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of TimedText:Guatemala's national anthem, performed by the U.S. Navy Band.ogg.en.srt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dylsss(talk contribs) 18:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Birthday![edit]

Wishing Illegitimate Barrister a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi navy[edit]

What edit did you make about it Jesus is king 123 (talk) 03:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quoi? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


November 2021 backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Seal of the District of Columbia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seal of the District of Columbia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seal of the District of Columbia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Respectful request about terminology[edit]

It was a long time ago and I don't know if you do this anymore, but can you please avoid making the kind of blanket changes of the term British to the term UK you made here on articles about the early 20th century and before please? It's against the typical terminology of the time and is in some ways more confusing in a world where the British empire existed. Thanks, Llewee (talk) 11:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"EE UU" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect EE UU and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#EE UU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 23:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Navy[edit]

Hi. Could you please take a look at the issue raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Flag Template#Template:Navy doesn't display navy flag as the documentation says it's supposed to? It appears that you did some work on the templates back in February 2018 but the implementation seems incomplete. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Navy and naval core templates[edit]

Since your user page guides that you should not be pinged on talk pages, I would feel so much better if you would chime in again at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Flag Template#Template:Navy doesn't display navy flag as the documentation says it's supposed to, and let us know if you agree that the navy and naval core templates should be swapped to fix the problems described there. Thanks in advance for your counsel. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 06:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing it to my attention. My template editing privileges were revoked a long time ago so I'm afraid I cannot carry out these edits; they'll have to be done by someone with the authority. I support any decision the consensus produces. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 07:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to hear about your TEs, because you appear to be an excellent template editor. If there is anything I can do just let me know. Thank you for your support, and it looks like everything's copacetic. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 15:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Country data The Canadas[edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Country data The Canadas[edit]

Template:Country data The Canadas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Indefatigable (talk) 21:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fire of the Raging Dragon[edit]

Notice

The article Fire of the Raging Dragon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBOOK. The last three references are not about the book. The World link is only a mention in a review of another book. The WZZM reference is dead and is from the hometown of the publisher, Zondervan. The Google Books and the FictionDB references only establish that the book exists. I can't find any other substantive reviews online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SchreiberBike | ⌨  04:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Navy comm" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Navy comm and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Navy comm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montgomery County Police Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutual aid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean Nava[edit]

Notice

The article Sean Nava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG as all coverage is surround the subject's death and is a possible case of WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 16:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Sean Nava for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Nava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Nava until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GPL93 (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Confused[edit]

Hey Illegitimate Barrister, can you explain this edit[1] for me? Theres got to be something I'm not getting here. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just added a picture of a person that is pertinent to the publication. What's not to get. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you source the image? I noticed that it was also you who added it to wikicommons. I've never seen an ID used like that. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Said person's official Twitter. It's all on there on the Commons page. Is a work of the VA so public domain. Anything else. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't seem kosher, notice that nobody else has ever added VA id's. Can you explain a bit more about why you think that this is ok? Presumably this would not just apply to VA id's but to any government issued id, no? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Since U.S. federal government works are public domain. There's nothing sensitive on there, just a name and picture. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


There also is a unique identifying number which would appear to be a no-go per WP:BLPPRIVACY, please maintain this discussion on your talk page until complete. The alternative is having this discussion at ANI. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The number's meaningless; I have one of those ID cards myself and the numbers just refer to the date that the card application was sent out. Not much you can do with it; not like it's a home address or anything. No "privacy concern" there. Anything else? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Either its meaningless or it refers to the date that the card application was sent out, it can't be both. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're making a mountain out of a molehill; it's meaningless because it refers to the date the card was applied for and thus there's not much you can do with it hence no "privacy concern" there. You're making much ado about nothing. Also this discussion would be better suited for the Commons than Wikipedia. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its unique personal information, it appears to function as an account number or similar. The BLP concern is here no there, I don't edit on commons. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's not an "account number". There's nothing you can do with it that would compromise anyone's privacy. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That isn't the BLP standard, the BLP standard is just that it be personal information. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The BLP says "postal addresses, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, or other contact information". None of that applies here; you're tilting at windmills. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It also says "Consensus has indicated that the standard for inclusion of personal information of living persons is higher than mere existence of a reliable source that could be verified." and "phone numbers, addresses, account numbers, etc." (it clearly is more than just contact info) I think it best if we err on the side of caution and not use images of identity documents at all for general purposes. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, if you want to remove the pic go ahead, I won't shed a tear. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I probably just should have done it and not discussed it with you. I just want to make sure that semi-doxing people with their gov id doesn't become a trend. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, next time just do that. The BLP says to just remove such info without making a big fuss about it to avoid unwanted attention. Either way, in this case it wasn't "doxxing" since there's nothing to dox. The number that you're so concerned about is literally just a date written in YYYYMMDD form. It doesn't access anything like a bank account or something like that. Anyway, I added a picture without the rest of the card if that better suits your fancy. I.B. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flags of counties of the United States for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flags of counties of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flags of counties of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Cape Town, Western Cape.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Cape Town, Western Cape.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 17:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was no need to resize a 300×300 cover[edit]

Hi. I'm very confused as to why you resized a 300×300 image when a square image with those dimensions is preferred or at the very least "a common choice" (per Template:Infobox album: "square images should therefore not exceed 316px (300px is a common choice for square album covers)") and perfectly within fair use per WP:IMGSIZE. An image in an infobox is set at 300×300, which WP:IMGSIZE states the maximum is "equivalent to 300px at the default preference selection of "220px". It seems only fitting that we should put it at the maximum allowable size. Therefore I don't know why this was replaced by you or why you would replace it. I'm sure you're aware, but the maximum fair use dimension for cover art is 316×316 (which is also what DatBot resizes the images to when they are flagged for being too large). That doesn't mean it should be or needs to be scaled down to 220×220. Ss112 17:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022[edit]

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 815 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


National Resistance Front of Afghanistan[edit]

Hi, Im ismail karimi, media editor at the office of Spokesperson of national resistance front of Afghanistan.

I noticed that the website provided in our article on English version of Wikipedia is not correct and not official, the official one is www.nationalresistance.org But unfortunately i couldn't modify it as the article is secured.

I have the all sources and can provide any needed official documents that confirms the website provided above.

The reason why i contacted you is because you have edited the article before as seen in its history.

I hope for your cooperation، thanks... Ismail karimi12 (talk) 13:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ismail karimi12: Done; good luck in your fight sir. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 14:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Sad[edit]

Hey. Lil Keke36 (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy ho. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana.gif[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022[edit]

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15068 articles, as of 08:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on![edit]

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Badge of the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (Maryland).png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Badge of the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (Maryland).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (Maryland).png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (Maryland).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patch of the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (Maryland).png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patch of the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (Maryland).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

USS District of Columbia[edit]

Hey, not a big deal, but in the future I would avoid copying someone else's comment without attribution, as you did at Talk:USS District of Columbia (SSBN-826)#Requested move 13 July 2022. It also came off as slightly WP:BLUDGEON-y to me when you did it twice to the two opposes, one of which was already involved in the comment thread the text was from. Just my take on it, since title changes can be so contentious already. Thanks for your consideration! Cerebral726 (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022[edit]

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Request[edit]

Hi, can you please upload the (Re-Recorded) national anthem of Pakistan on Wikipedia, The (Re-Recorded) anthem is recorded with latest equipments released by government of Pakistan on 14 August to celebrate Pakistan platinum (75th) Independence Day.

(Re-Recorded) anthem is released in Audio, Video and different (Instrumental) versions.[2] 103.141.159.231 (talk) 07:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: National anthem of Pakistan is first time (Re-Recorded) with latest equipments since its first released in 1950s.

That version is copyrighted so it can't be uploaded. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 12:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message[edit]

Hi Illegitimate Barrister,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signed. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cornwall, Ontario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Nations.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 15:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cyber Anakin#A mountain out of molehill? and Talk:Cyber Anakin#Starting_over[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cyber Anakin § A mountain out of molehill? and Talk:Cyber Anakin#Starting_over. 41.180.216.238 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Wishing Illegitimate Barrister a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 12:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ty ty! – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 15:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

ty ty! – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 15:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

tyty – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Coat of arms of Nanaimo, Canada.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Nanaimo, Canada.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Seal of Lompoc, California.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Seal of Lompoc, California.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Terasail[✉️] 03:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Deputy Sheriff I" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Deputy Sheriff I and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 23#Deputy Sheriff I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 07:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


"Disting." listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Disting. and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 1 § Disting. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. An anonymous username, not my real name 19:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Illegitimate Barrister![edit]

Happy New Year!

Illegitimate Barrister,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

tyty – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angola's national anthem, performed by the United States Navy Band (March 1996 arrangement).ogg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Angola's national anthem, performed by the United States Navy Band (March 1996 arrangement).ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Billytanghh (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Proposed deletion of Pesnya[edit]

Notice

The article Pesnya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No disimbiguation at all, just collection of russian phrases with word "pesnya"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible deletion of Vehicle registration plates of the United States for 2021[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you frequently edit some of the annual license plate articles. The 2021 article is up for deletion, which means that the entire series of articles might end up being deleted. I'd appreciate it if you would weigh in on the discussion at the following link to "Keep" the article.

[[3]]

Thanks! Zcarstvnz (talk) 14:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Grilled beef" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Grilled beef has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 21 § Grilled beef until a consensus is reached. :3 F4U (they/it) 11:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 06:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] 

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Brian Reynolds Myers[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Brian Reynolds Myers, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Brian Reynolds Myers[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Brian Reynolds Myers, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

List of presidents of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea[edit]

Hello,

I noticed you created this article. I was wondering where you got the translations/information from; I myself have been struggling with how to translate these titles, as info on the KPG in English tends to be sparse. Did you translate them yourself? toobigtokale (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I lifted it from another Wikipedia article. Can't remember, was a while ago. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you're curious it looks like you got it from List of presidents of South Korea. Thanks! toobigtokale (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's the one! – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vehicle registration plates of the United States in the 21st century[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Vehicle registration plates of the United States in the 21st century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol needs your help![edit]

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply] 

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Namdaemun door?[edit]

Greetings to you. I'm wondering why you changed the translation of "Namdaemun" from "south great gate" to "south great door." While it is true that 문 can mean door, it can also mean gate. Wouldn't the latter be more appropriate here? Gratefully, Mark Froelich (talk) 23:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

문 means door most of the time. See this Google Image Search for instance, all doors. Even Korean Wikipedia says it means door predominantly. At least if we're talking literally; my edit was for the literal translation rather than figurative. I have gone ahead and added a figurative translation since you brought it up. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs),

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Casualties of the Russo-Ukrainian War[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Casualties of the Russo-Ukrainian War, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I.R.O.A." listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect I.R.O.A. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 11 § I.R.O.A. until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 00:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi[edit]

I saw you rename the image file on my user page on the Thai Wikipedia. So I sent a message to greet you. Noobythailand (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, thanks! – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up[edit]

Thought you'd want to be aware of this if you weren't already. Normally I might go bold, but I think this IS the guy. We would benefit from his participation and I thought he and Dr. J might hit it off. Since you're the primary contributor to the page, I thought your eyes would be useful. Lots of uncited stuff (added by an ip in Adams County, PA). Living subjects are becoming a problem again, because Wikipedia is seen as a more reliable provider these days. Subjects have a reasonable expectation of accurate coverage, IMHO. BusterD (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, thx for pointing it out.
– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 16:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GAE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Empire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Se7en and Patti Kim.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

F8[edit]

Please don't blank a page when marking it as move to Commons. It makes reviews more difficult. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"ROI flag" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect ROI flag has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 20 § ROI flag until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


CS1 error on Nikolai Patrushev[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nikolai Patrushev, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ukexit[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ukexit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 6#UKexit. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 16:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaithersburg, MD police car (c. 1983).jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gaithersburg, MD police car (c. 1983).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 19:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1923[edit]

Hi Illegitimate Barrister. You recently made this edit to 1923 adding a footnote named 'Hammer', but the reference isn't defined. Do you know what this might refer to? Leschnei (talk) 13:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I copied it from September 1923. Fixed it now. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Leschnei (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
np. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


November Articles for creation backlog drive[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional ships of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Fictional ships of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move request on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move "File:Flag map of Rhodesia (1964–1968, zoomed).svg" to "File:Flag map of Rhodesia (1964–1968).svg", thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move request on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move "File:Flag of South Africa (1928-1994) (AWB).svg" to "File:Flag of South Africa (1928–1994, AWB).svg", thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 14:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move request on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move "File:Flag map of Southern Rhodesia (1924–1953, 1963–1964).svg" to "File:Flag map of Southern Rhodesia (1924–1964).svg", thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC) – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 06:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation[edit]

Hi Illegitimate Barrister :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 16:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boynton Beach, FL Seal.png[edit]

Hi Illegitimate Barrister, you tagged File:Boynton Beach, FL Seal.png as being available on Commons, but it doesn't appear to exist under the same name. It is perhaps under a different name on Commons? ✗plicit 02:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed now. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 12:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 15:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 16:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"MOS:fLAG" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect MOS:fLAG has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5 § MOS:fLAG until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vanessa Marquez[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister, I just wanted to let you know, as the editor who originally added the video of Vanessa Marquez's shooting to her article, that I've raised it for discussion at the external links noticeboard. Your input would be welcome and appreciated. Kurtis (talk) 13:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hey IB, I wanted to follow-up from your comment a couple days ago (which I acknowledge that you deleted shortly thereafter). For me, it's not so much that Marquez's personality rights are being violated, but more a question of whether the inclusion of video footage depicting a person's fatal shooting is warranted by the circumstances. It feels like something that should always have some type of discussion preceding it, for no other reason than the fact that it is a sensitive matter. Does that make sense? Just to be clear, none of this is intended as a criticism of your contributions or even the addition of the video. It's just something I wanted to bring up for outside input. Just so you're aware, I've submitted an RfC asking for third opinions from uninvolved Wikipedians. As before, your input is both welcome and appreciated. :) Kurtis (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, no offense taken. My view is, this is an encyclopedia and showing through visual media conveys information better than merely telling through plain text. The same reason we have photographs to illustrate things here, even if copyrighted through fair use. I mean, if you go to the Nanjing Massacre page, the very first photo is a shot of corpses, or The Holocaust page, showing images of mass murders. I don't see anyone saying those pictures should be taken down for being offensive. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I completely understand where you're coming from. Wikipedia is not censored, and we certainly do not shy away from showing visual depictions of violence and suffering when there is encyclopedic value that we can add in doing so. On the other hand, I also think it's important to balance the value of a file's inclusion with sensitivity and care; for instance, we wouldn't include a link to the New Zealand mosque shootings out of respect towards the victims' loved ones. The line can be very difficult to determine, and is often a pretty subjective call, which is why I thought there would be value in bringing it for discussion. If the video (or a link to it) is to be included, it'll have community consensus to back it up. Kurtis (talk) 21:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 18:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:National anthems of Serbia[edit]

Template:National anthems of Serbia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DB-F5[edit]

{{db-f5}} only applies to non-free images where the article in which it was used has been deleted. That is not the case for three images you recently tagged. Furthermore, the assertion is that the images are now PD, and F5 only applies to non-free images. As they are now on Commons, the F8 should be sufficient. -- Whpq (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roger. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD-MAGov[edit]

The PD-MAGov template was deleted here. What is the plan for the the pages that you added this template to today? Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently in the process of transferring those files over to the Wikimedia Commons. I put the template on there because while it may not be a template here, it is a template over on the Wikimedia Commons, so that way, when the file is transferred over to said Wikimedia Commons the template is on there automatically ready to go. It was done to save me extra time and wasted effort because there are a lot of files to transfer over. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 17:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great, can I help with the transfer? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you're an admin, you can undelete the hidden revisions, as they are preventing me from migrating them using FileImporter. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 22:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you give me an example of one? I am an admin here, but not on commons. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All the files in this category (Category:Official seals of places in Massachusetts) that have hidden revisions, unhide them. That will allow me to migrate them to the Wikimedia Commons. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 23:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see, I will work on that. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will start from the bottom of that category and move up if you want to get started moving. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish American chefs has been nominated for splitting[edit]

Category:Jewish American chefs has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 01:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First one is protected so an admin has to do it. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move request on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

File:Flag of South Africa (1928–1994, small flags).svg → File:Flag of South Africa (1928–1982, small flags).svg

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 08:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 12:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 02:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhegër, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kamenica and Kumanova.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: if you have enough time, could you please rename all these files? Thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Now That's What I Call Music! 5 (U.S. series" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Now That's What I Call Music! 5 (U.S. series has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Now That's What I Call Music! 5 (U.S. series until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"New York (U.S. state" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect New York (U.S. state has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § New York (U.S. state until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Manual Inline Lift Fluctuator" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Manual Inline Lift Fluctuator has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 2 § Manual Inline Lift Fluctuator until a consensus is reached. Queen of Hearts talk
she/they
stalk 00:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PG County Sheriff[edit]

The Article Rescue Barnstar
Insane amount of referencing and work done on the article! Good job! It's me... Sallicio! 16:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, the pleasure's all mine. Much appreciated. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 16:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Annet Mahendru shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thedarkknightli (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Oui, oui. Tres bien. Merci beaucoup, mon ami. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date Changes without citations[edit]

Hi, it appears you're making a large number of changes to important dates on articles relating to living people (e.g. BLP's) without providing sources for those changes. In at least two instances (1, 2, it appears that the change directly contradicted the existing source in the article. Can you please explain where you're sourcing the content for these changes? ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 05:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Department of Defense's website has a person lookup feature where if you put in their name and date of birth it'll tell you their dates of service; you can use that to verify. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a link to that feature? ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 05:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've got some concerns about the suitability of that as a source on BLP articles; given that it's a USG-authorized-access-only database created for verifying eligibility for SCRA protections and the signup for it contains "By clicking the box marked "I Accept," you indicate that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and that you certify, under penalty of perjury, that you are only using this website for the permissible uses identified in this Agreement." By definition, sourcing dates on Wikipedia is not one of the outlined permissible uses. This does not seem like it satisfies WP:V. Also doesn't seem to satisfy WP:BLPPRIMARY, specifically: ("Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies.") ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 05:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Move request on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move "File:Flag of Portugal sea (1830).svg" to "File:Flag of Portugal sea (1830–1910).svg", thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 14:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 14:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you.

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Illegitimate Barrister: are you going to rename all of them? ColorfulSmoke (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ColorfulSmoke: Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 14:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024[edit]

Hello Illegitimate Barrister,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for notable[edit]

In this edit, do you believe that these are reliable and verifiable sources to support the connection to Union City? Please see the AfD I started and please let me know if there are better sources available. Alansohn (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at all three sources you added, and none of these appear particularly reliable to me. Facebook is meh at best, but the two alumni / classmate sites are rather poor quality. Do you think they are? Alansohn (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose, it's better than nothing. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


"London Bridge (Lake Havasu City" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect London Bridge (Lake Havasu City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § London Bridge (Lake Havasu City until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests on wikimedia commons[edit]

@Illegitimate Barrister: please move

thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in List of ongoing armed conflicts[edit]

Why were some of the flags removed in the List of ongoing armed conflicts, as far as I can find the use of the flags in the article does not fall under any of the Inappropriate use for flags in MOS:FLAG. Also why were some flags kept but not others? I can't find any consistency with your choices, I get that "Consistency is not paramount" but what makes the use of flags for the Insurgency in Cabo Delgado "unclear, ambiguous or controversial" while the flags for the for the Sahel insurgency are not? Also why did you put Burma for the location of the Myanmar civil war? That is no longer the name of the country. Garmin21 (talk) 02:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was taking a break. Per your input, all flagicons have since been removed, and the Burmese typo has been fixed. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 19:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "New Tanks for Old", U.S. Navy Civil Engineer Corps Bulletin, vol. Vol 2 NAVDOCKS P-2, no. No 14, Bureau of BuDocks, Dept. of the Navy, p. 51, January 1948 {{citation}}: |issue= has extra text (help); |volume= has extra text (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Illegitimate_Barrister/Archive_3&oldid=1219278042"