User talk:Sephiroth BCR/Archive 2

Castlevania Characters Page

Well, I'm a newbie, but as to the question of splitting the character page, it might make sense to split between Belmonts (or some category including Main, Playable Characters), Bad Guys, and Other Good Guys (or Minor Characters). However, because all of these characters are very game-specific, it might make more sense to split it into categories of games. The problem with that is the page would be humongous, and dealing with recurring characters would be a headache. So that's why my vote would be for the former. Then the question is whether one page would be main characters or split into Belmont and non-Belmont main playable protagonists. And what do you do with Alucard, who likes to pop up all over the timeline? I don't know, but finding non-original character creation, conception, design etc research would be difficult, if not impossible without knowing Japanese. It doesn't seem to come up in interviews a lot, and, for all I know and can find, IGA pulls characters out of his... nostrils. That's all the suggestions/comments on that I have. KristenDArgyle 01:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)KristenDArgyle

Sorry bout that

Started it at 3 in the morning and was pissed, then I just thought it was funny. (Not that vandals deserve such good treatment mind you) but I will refain from it again.TheUltimate3 23:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm on Editor Review

I'm on Editor Review!.Sam ov the blue sand 03:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Images

Okay, so then the new Itachi picture I put up was better then correct? Also, I'll look over the images before I put one up to see if ones better. I just think new pictures should be put up, for those who have been seen in Shippuuden so far. For I think the images are much better then from Part I. Though I do see you're point with the Kisame one. Akuba Ketsueki 19:07, 19 July 2007

WP:POKE is doing some housecleaning

This notice is to inform you that because many people have added their names to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants but do not seem to be active, all names are being deleted in an effort to find out who is still truly interested in the project. All you have to do is re-add your name if you'd still like to be considered a member of WP:POKE. Any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 17:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Castlevania characters

Seeing as you're probably more familiar with the series than I am, which characters need articles? Alucard seems to be a definite, while Simon Belmont, Dracula, and Soma seem like decent possibilities. TTN 01:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I would say that any "main" main characters can be placed on the list, while major series can be like Sorrow with their own split off articles. Character lists without OOU info should probably just redirect to their one game. I'll probably redirect that bosses article. TTN 18:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Naruto

Actually Tsunade uses it in the anime when naruto tries to steal her suitcase to repay her debt.They run nd naruto use the mass. shadow clone jutsu and the tsunade uses the mass. shadow clone jutsu.So at least know what ur talking about when u try to stop someone from helping wikipedia.No Hard Feelings though.:^) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian Naiqwan (talk • contribs)

If you were watching, you would have noticed that the "Tsunade" most of the time is a transformed Shizune. And that's the regular Shadow Clone Technique. The Multiple Shadow Clone Technique makes hundreds or thousands of clones. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 23:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

She Says mass.so i dont care if it makes three.if she says mass its mass.sry:^) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian Naiqwan (talk • contribs)

Not in the one I'm watching. Perhaps in the English version, but as the Japanese version is the original, it is considered. And read my talk page rules and sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 00:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Tobi explicitly states that he has madara's power here http://narutomanga.17.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=2333&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15 We cannot be certain that he is madara. Ixrs 20:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)IXRS

~~Not sure if this is how we talk, but my info on mystical palm was correct, as seen in the anime, the fight with the sannin~~

License tagging for Image:ClashofNinja2Gameplay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ClashofNinja2Gameplay.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

3 Revert Rule

I noticed you've been involved in an edit conflict with User:Hartebeest. Though, in my opinion, you are correct here, please remember the 3 revert rule. He broke it as well, though It's just good to keep things cool. Cheers, †Ðanieltiger45† ^{Talk to me} 22:11, 26 July 2007

Vizards

So you're saying the list of vizards is not significantly long and does not deserve an article, but the Bounts do? Or is it just because it's edited by me? ------- Hartebeest

Civility

I have reviewed your report to AIV and issued a 24 hour block. However, when I was investigating, I came across a comment from you on Hartebeest's talk page in which you said "Being bold is not the same thing as being stupid." I caution you to remember Wikipedia's civility processes. Personal attacks and inuendo will not be tolerated. This is the only warning you will receive. I know you were frustrated, and understand that - but the only way this 'pedia works is if we all collaborate civilly. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. - Philippe | Talk 22:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Tobi

My edits for Tobi and Pein are accurate - read the text of the manga. He states, "My power ... Uchiha Madara's power!" User: Obrysii

That is an incorrect translation. He refers to himself as Uchiha Madara. Read this. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Since when was Tobi a "verifiable, reliable source"? I think you're falling into the prime trap of in-universe sources - taking character's words at face value. What makes this even more sad is that we do have prior instances of Tobi's unreliability being slapped in our face (maybe foreshadowing so that when this turns out to be a lie, it won't look like a deus ex machina?) - the Sanbi thing, remember?KrytenKoro 03:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

As I said before, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We make do with the information that we have now. Your comments are based on your own original research on the matter, which is not suitable for inclusion. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 03:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

No Tobi never said he was Uchiha Madara, he just said he has his power. Learn to read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinkapo (talk • contribs)

All I saw in that thing you posted on my talk are translations of Tobi saying he has the power of Uchiha Madara. THAT DOESN'T MEAN HE'S UCHIHA MADARA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinkapo (talk • contribs)

Tobi and Konoha

I'll add my comments here. My editing of Tobi likely being from Konoha is based upon what I read in the article on Tobi here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Akatsuki_members#Tobi I was trying to make the Akatsuki article consistant with this. Even if for some reason he's lying about being Madara specifically, the existance of the Sharingan is a strong enough implication that he is from the Uchiha clan. So why was the edit reverted? Could you change it back please? Tyciol 06:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Tobi's not displaying a forehead protector is somewhat irrelevant. In the entire Naruto series, the Uchiha has been referred to only as a Konoha clan. It's not an unrealistic assumption that if you are a member of the Uchiha bloodline, you were born into that village. The only way this could be otherwise is if he was descended from Uchihas who did not join in the founding of Konoha, something that has never been described or implied. He just likely left Konoha prior to Itachi's murdering the clan. He may have even had some influence in this. Tyciol 06:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

The problem here is that it's not original research, but drawing upon obvious associations of facts. For him not to be from Konoha requires the Uchiha clan not to be from Konoha, because we know he's part of that clan. Tobi is even listed under the Land of Fire article:

Currently, there are only three known surviving members of the clan: Sasuke Uchiha and his brother Itachi Uchiha, and the mysterious Madara Uchiha (also known as Akatsuki member Tobi

So I suggest you add some sort of disclaimer to that article saying "but even though he's from Uchiha, Tobi may not have ever lived in Konoha and may be some ancient member or the son of some Uchiha who left the village one time long ago." Personally, I think the requirements needed for Tobi NOT being from Konoha require far more speculation than assuming he is. If you'll note in my original edit, I did not say he was definately a member, but 'probably'. Because he IS probably from there, you just don't see his forehead protector. One interesting thing to ask is... who has actually seen Tobi use Sharingan? It's possible that he would hide his protector and not use Sharingan as to not tip off members of Akatsuki (as well as their enemies) as to his original identity, especially in the case of Itachi if he is not aware of it. Tyciol 06:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism accusations related to Naruto's resilience

I believe you're making unrealistic accusations of vandalism. It is quite obvious that in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ninjutsu_in_Naruto_%28S-Z%29 I was not deliberately introducing incorrect information. I believe it to be correct information. I am taking it up with SomeGuy0830 who reverted the edit, so I don't see why you're the one warning me. It has been demonstrated throughout the series that Kyuubi enhances the healing of Naruto's cells and his chakra pathways. These are what are described as being damaged through the use of Naruto's wind technique. When Naruto refers to his resilience, that resilience is obviously due to the Kyuubi. This is why he is physically reckless. Identifying this is NOT vandalism. To further elaborate, see Ahimsa and Wikipedia:Assume good faith. I think you're violating these philosophies calling me a vandal. Tyciol 07:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Connell66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I love FF7, and Sephiroth is the coolest villian ever!

Land of Fire

I was not experimenting with the edit of Madara Uchiha. I was making a true edit.Darth G 03:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't get why, seeing as my edit made sense. But whatever, I'll let it die.Darth G 03:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

No Problem!

No problem, bout your userpage, reverting vandalism is what im here for ;) ACBestAutograph Book 05:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry About That

I'm sorry about the Vizard thing, but there's only 10 characters on the Bounts list(11 if you count Ho and Ban as individuals), that's not much more than 8 of the Vizard list. Plus, the way you and Someguy0830 revert everything I edited is pissing me off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hartebeest (talk • contribs)

Bleach Volume Summary

Just how do you write the godamn volume summary without messing the whole thing up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hartebeest (talk • contribs)

Shinigami lifespan

Hi. I don't mean to start a discussion for nothing but this has been bothering me: Do shinigami in Bleach age, eat, and use the bathroom? I know, its funny. Age like turn old, I meant, and have it effect their battle skills. I couldn't find anything official like that in any forums / sites and I think Rukia said something regarding this before. If it is so, it would explain why someone like Shigekuni looks like that. What knowledge can you share with me about this? Lord Sesshomaru

So they're like humans, except they live hundreds of years longer? I just thought it was so strange that shinigami even smoked cigarettes (I think) in one episode. That made me question their being. When are they seen eating something exactly, besides soul candy, in their shinigami form? Lord Sesshomaru 05:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

That's part of the reason why I disagreed with the Bleach concept; they're death gods, ghosts, etc., yet they have to ingest food when hungry. This may sound hilarious, but do they have sex too and have children?! I'm serious, Kubo f**k'd up on making them too "human" & didn't explain further. Oh, I also want to ask about categories, do the other arrancar besides Grimmjow share super strength, flight, and super speed alike? If so, I'll place those cats. (only if they're notable like his) and use this discussion as the reason for doing so. Lord Sesshomaru 06:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Did I get all of them? Lord Sesshomaru 06:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, if there's any doubt in my mind for Bleach, I'll come to you too. That's okay, right? I'm assuming you're a Bleach expert like Someguy00830 and tjstrf? Lord Sesshomaru 07:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 10:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Episodes Page

Ummmm, please go onto the Naruto's episodes page, apparently someone vandalized it. Just scroll right all the way, the scroll down. Someone spelled Naruto with giant purple letters. It stretches the page. User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares

Nevermind. It was removed. User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.

Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 31	30 July 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Another experiment and Wikimania
Report on Citizendium	Response: News from Citizendium
User resigns admin status amid allegations of sock puppetry	WikiWorld comic: "Mr. Bean"
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Luppi

Hey, do you know when was the decision to merge Luppi with Hollows in Bleach? I didn't seem to think that it was decided by the editors of Bleach editors.--Hanaichi 04:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Okay I just wanted to know. But I don't know how the rest will react though. Thanks alot.--Hanaichi 04:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Knighthammer

Best not to use vandalism templates on him for article reverts. Even if he is woefully violating fair-use, he's doing so in good faith. Use {{uw-own1}} and {{uw-3rr}}. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Maybe, but again it implies the user's doing it as disruption. He's just doing it because he wants his format used somewhere. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, you could probably get him for that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Someguy0830

The article this user is editing is not even in its FINAL state yet. He's flagging many images MADE by me and used similar fonts to represent the images.

The format being used is one that was used after several revisions of format to establish information many wanted to have visible on the article.

Someguy0830 has jumped onto OTHER topics I've been involved with before but I let it go because clearly no one else wanted to use what I was offering.

This is a brand new article created by me with the intent to bring a great deal of knowledge to the community and *MANY* people have helped to plug in the information.

A user jumping in and just changing things hurts the work of the greater good and I've just finished fighting off issues with mass vandalism as you can see from the discussion log.

Beyond that Someguy0830 was extremely rude in the past and now with making comments such as "ridiculous usage of X, Y, Z" as his reasons for changing things.

This is no more or less a form of harassment on Someguy's part. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Knighthammer (talk • contribs).

• The information presented on that page is an attempt to give the information about the shows that most people in the community I herald from are looking for most readily.
• The images are NOT screen shots, they are images *I* made myself, from scratch. They are images that illustrate the blocks they were associated with.

I personally contributed *A LOT* to this article and I'm pretty offended when someone roles in and indiscriminately starts changing everything without even talking about it. Bottom like is the guy was rude about it. It wasn't a matter of adding or helping the article. Read his comments using "ridiculous" or "stupid" as his comments. Who does that?

Forgive me for being in a bad mood over this, but the guy started messing with this article DIRECTLY after the article was vandalized. You can see this in the dicussion log or the history.

Before all this started we had an informative article that provides *A LOT* of information both visually and through text. After this ordeal, I don't know whats going to be left.Knighthammer 07:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Question then:

Why have the Keep/Delete'/Merge thing if voting means squat? I'm actually curious about that.TheUltimate3 23:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh. Alright that clears things up. Thanks. TheUltimate3 23:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Pay Attention When You Edit

Quality, not quanitiy. Rather than seeing how many pictures can be tagged in one minute, please take your time when editing. So many articles have been screwed up because your tagging has been placed inside the code. I usually wouldn't be angry with mistakes like this, but after seeing it happen frequently and done usually due to 10 or more edits on the same page in less than a minute, I am really annoyed. When you edit, pay attention. Don't just copy and paste a deletion tag for each and every image you see as quickly as you can. --Superneoking 02:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 32	6 August 2007	About the Signpost

Committee makes statement on U.S. chapter	About: The Wikipedia Plays
Review: The Wikipedia Plays	WikiWorld comic: "Terry Gross"
News and notes: Similpedia, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Complaint

I'm not complaining about putting images up for deletation, because in the last 6 months I stopped caring. But dammit, I can't SEE what article has been edited on the One Piece pages in the last 24 hours because their clogged up with your nominated pics for deletation! I patrol those pages for vandals, I cannot see the vandals currently. Can you at last give us 24 break on the One Piece pages so anyone can investigate signs of vandalism. We get rabid Naruto fans vandalising the main page reglaurly, about 2-6 times a week, thats without the other pages. Angel Emfrbl 16:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not interested in a pretty speech about what I should and shouldn't do because that won't change the current situation and mess we have to clean up because on your behalf. There is still an almight backlog of pages that are going to painstakingly see through just because you got delete happy. I know what I can and can't. Get real, I'm not some random newb. And getting a fancey pants program to the job won't ness. help because your burried all the vandalism in your edits to delete pictures!

I don't even think you know the extent of the programs you create. And I still point out, that instead of throwing up a delete thing on all pictures, why didn't you get a discussion going, or put some text up to get it legitized? Or something. Now I don't care about pictures (delete them, their no loss to me), but how you work is just plain sloppy, you don't even check at times the edits are correct. Angel Emfrbl 23:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)