Wikipedia:BNA/Approved

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old approved applications[edit]

  1. User:Sitush. I use British newspaper archives mostly for biographical and history articles and make regular use of my ability to access those for The Guardian and The Times that are available to me already via my local library. I recently took out a month's subscription to the BNA because it contains a vast selection of useful sources beyond those to which I already have access. Alas, I can't keep paying for it and so I've just grabbed items that are being incorporated into a new article about John Leigh, the first Medical Officer of Health in Manchester, and that might be useful for further expansion of William Beach Thomas. - Sitush (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Jeff5102. In eight years, I made over 7,400 edits on the English Wikipedia. There is a wide variety of topics I am busy with. My favourite topics are, among others, Russian History, Sports, academic journals, arts, music and politics. I would like to improve articles by searching for better citations, and expanding articles of politicians and historical figures who deserve a more detailed article. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 21:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Racklever. I would like to have access mainly to view obituaries so that I can update biographical articles. --Racklever (talk) 21:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Racklever: Most of the newspapers in the collection, are only covered up through the middle of the 20th century. Could you be more specific about what types of biographical articles you mean to update, Sadads (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sadads:I would like to expand biographies of 19th century and early 20th century politicians and business leaders. Access to the obituaries which were printed in papers would be helpful.--Racklever (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC) (member of the 50,000 edit club[reply]
    Thanks just wanted to confirm (a few people signed up with the intention of accessing more recent stuff: Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 18:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I am a published researcher on Phineas Gage and have been working on that article for several years to bring it up to date with the most current research. Gage's case was widely reported in the popular press in the 19th c, and in the last 20 years we've had good luck tracking down reports of him in American papers and magazines. However, there's much still to be done with British publications. This is especially important because we believe there may be British advertisements for Gage's employer in Chile. EEng (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I wish to access British newspapers to better able to edit articles on UK subjects. I live in Australia so my local library only offers city papers. Paul Austin (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I regularly create British biographies and other British articles so this should be useful. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I'd like to mine these newspapers for information on other country's battleships, particularly those of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Trevj Being provided with access would be of assistance to me in adding sourced content to articles predominantly related to Britain, and also perhaps adding a more European viewpoint to worldwide topics. If granted access, I anticipate that initial use may focus on the history of computing in Britain. I also have a developing interest in local history, and would expect the archive to be useful in writing/improving entries relating to biographies or historical events. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 00:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Sturmvogel_66 I need BNA access to fill out my articles on British warships, especially since the Times often mentioned ship movements back in the day. As an American I have no access to these sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:SlimVirgin. I would love this. I'm often looking around for primary-source material. For example, I'm currently trying to find out about what happened to the former buildings of the Marshalsea prison in London after it closed down. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon Sadads (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Shyamal I look up old archival information for a range of British-India-related interests. I also provide support to reference seekers at WP:RX. Shyamal (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Carrite - I do labor history, primarily US but also UK. Carrite (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:Skookum1 - I do Canadian and British Columbian history, many topics in which involve Britain and the British Empire, and occasionally topics/titles in other parts of the former Empire; coverage of early Canadian history in British newspapers would add material to various articles, including some major topics where the British side is poorly represented currently e.g. Bering Sea Arbitration and Alaska Boundary Dispute. Older biographies may also benefit, as obits and other coverage in British newspapers may have more information on the subjects than what is here now.Skookum1 (talk) 02:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Ad Orientem - I would like access to the BNA in order to more effectively contribute to the SHIPS project, especially ocean liners, and the Royalty and Nobility project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ad Orientem: - I checked your user contributions and noticed that you have not been doing a lot of content development recently, instead doing Administrative work. Can you please gives some links to articles that show your commitment to content development or reference desk work. Also what is your upcoming article agenda? (I ask because we would like these first batch of accounts for the pilot to go to users who will actively use them; if you don't think you will write content in that period, you may want to wait until the 3 month assessment is done - we hope that the number of accounts will expand), Sadads (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sadads I have a long list of articles I want to work on from the List of ocean liners, but I am definitely a part timer. If there are other more active editors and a limited supply of the free accounts, I think they should go first. Thanks for the note... -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ad Orientem: Part timer is okay! We all are! I just wanted to make sure that you had a content agenda (you hadn't been working on content much recently) :) I am going to approve you contingent on some article work once you start, since the resources would prove invaluable for your list of articles you want to work on. If you need any collaborators, there are a number of other ship writers on this list, such as User:Sturmvogel_66 and User:The ed17, Sadads (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email in the near future, Sadads (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Charles Matthews. I'm heavily involved in British history through the Dictionary of National Biography WikiProject. After JSTOR, this would be the most useful of the current Library resources in the work of developing the old public domain text. Charles Matthews (talk) 03:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Cccefalon. I maintain the scope Malaysia/Sabah/British North Borneo in the german wikipedia. English literature and newspapers are my main source of research. Though my contributions to english wikipedia are not that much, my total edit count over all projects is beyond 10.000 edits. I hope, I'm eligible for participating. --Cccefalon (talk • contribs) 05:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:Euryalus - my account is 7 years old and I have around 22,000 edits of which around 12,000 are content creation. I work mainly on European, colonial and Royal Navy history, with a further emphasis on reference improvement. Euryalus (talk) 08:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. User:Tony Holkham - My interest is in Welsh and English local history that becomes of national or international interest, either when it happens or later. Particular areas currently of interest are south west Wales and central southern England. I am already a keen user of Welsh newspapers online, which are freely accessible. Tony Holkham (talk) 09:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Michig. I do a lot of content and sourcing work, and would find access to the BNA invaluable for several areas that I am already active in including local history and sport, and would help me to expand my editing into new areas. Have done a few searches and obviously can't see the full articles but the search results look like this would be fantastic for sources on inter-war speedway teams and riders and early 20th century boxers, to name just two areas. --Michig (talk) 10:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Wolbo Made 45,000+ edits since 2006 and created some 130 BLPs. Mainly editing in the area of sports (tennis) bios and history. Would like to use BNA's sources to further improve these articles and their citations and hopefully take a few to GA status.--Wolbo (talk) 10:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Wolbo: Most of the newspapers in the archive end at or around early/middle parts of teh 20th century. You mentioned BLPs being important, can you confirm that the age of the sources will still not interfere with your content contributions, Sadads (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sadads: Yes I can. While I do some editing on (tennis) BLPs from the 50s, 60s and 70s (currently working on Lew Hoad) my main interest is in the period 1900–1950, or even earlier if available.--Wolbo (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Sounds good, just wanted to make sure you signed up for the right resource :) Sadads (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email in the near future, Sadads (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Loginnigol (talk · contribs) Active editor for a couple of years on English and Dutch language Wikipedia. Over 7000 page edits. Contribute editing in many areas but particularly arts, science, religion, music and sports, all of which are areas that I very much need to use a high quality resource archive like BNA. —Loginnigol (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Hindustanilanguage (talk · contribs) mainly active on Hindi Wikipedia. Wrote article on English and Urdu Wikipedia as well. Wikimedian since 2011. 40000+ edits across all projects. --Muzammil (talk) 13:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. User:Welsh - 9 years, 96,000 edits. Mainly improving articles on interests such as Wales, UK military, UK railway history. Referencable sources are always needed. welsh (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. I would love one of these accounts and can see them being very useful as i expand tropical cyclone articles.Jason Rees (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jason Rees: - Most of the sources included in the database end before the middle of the 20th century, can you confirm that historical newspapers would be of use to you within that limitation? Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jason Rees: Please respond to confirm that you still need this source, Sadads (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I could use it to expand our coverage of deadly cyclones in the past (eg:1800s) but i probably wont.Jason Rees (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jason Rees: it sounds like you will be okay if I rotate your slot to someone else then. We expect the partnership will expand in the future; I plan to ping everyone who didn't get accounts in this round. Sadads (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    That will be fine.Jason Rees (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Partnership expand, Approved, expect a Wikipedia email, Sadads (talk) 14:43, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. I am mostly active on the French Wikipedia, where this could be useful too. Thierry Caro (talk) 15:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Tmol42 - Regularly work on adding content and citations missing for historical content in settlement and biographical articals. This would be a valuable extra tool.Tmol42 (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Wehwalt (talk · contribs) I have 108 FAs but am handicapped in doing some that I've contemplated on British topics because I don't have access to newspaper archives.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Struway2 – 7 years. ~50,000 edits. Creating and improving sports history and bio articles. Have had access to Gale's 19th-century British newspapers, which I found very useful but also very frustrating when they stopped at 1900. Struway2 (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Struway2: Unfortunately many of these newspapers end somewhere in the first half of the 20th century. You can browse through what is accessable without an account. Please confirm that you still would like access, Sadads (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    My particular interest is in football (soccer) and its players up to the 1920s, so that limitation isn't a problem. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 19:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Brilliant! Just wanted to make sure, Sadads (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email in the near future, Sadads (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Gareth E Kegg I've made more than 35,000 edits over 9 years and constantly find a need for reliable citations from British newspapers. I have delighted in my HighBeam account, and access to any other sources would be extremely welcome. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 18:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs) Been bouncing around about 9 years. I spend a lot of time hunting sources for my own work, for expansion and for verification and have had to make requests at WP:RX for material this would allow me to access directly. Approaching 80K edits (by X's counter) and just had my third featured article promoted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Fraggle81 (talk · contribs) Editor over 7 years and with 63000+ edits. I would like to use an account for fact verification in relation to my counter vandalism work. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fraggle81: We are mostly getting these accounts for content creators. The way I understand it, most topics of interest or covered by this database would not be receiving vandalism (historical biographies/events mostly). We are in the process of getting Find My Past set up (same company), that includes a broader set of materials more suited for birthdate checking, etc. which my be of better use for counter vandalism. Can you confirm that this is what you need and clarify how it would help with counter-vandalism? Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I have a large gap in what I can reference with regards to historical British topics since other sources I have access to do not cover the range of historical material that the BNA collection does. There are the ones who will change dates but there are others who will add and change a whole manner of facts which I cannot easily verify. I use STiki to check a variety of edits however my particular interest is watching and maintaining British articles. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Fraggle81: Sounds good! Maybe you could also use the source to support Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange as well, expect an email soon, Sadads (talk) 00:36, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ponyo (talk · contribs) Yes please! Right now I'm stuck with mainly Canadian Newsstand dailies as the local college library has a very limited archive subscriptions. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:EtienneDolet I've made 200+ articles as a Wikipedia editor. I have around 15,000 edits. I'm in constant need of more sources. Would really appreciate this. Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. czar (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm actually doing a series of articles on English boarding schools from the early 20th century—this could be really useful for that czar ♔ 00:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2007, 7000 edits, 80% in articles. Active in areas of MidEast, I/P, early US history, European history, and development of water resource infrastructure. Recently received Questia.CasualObserver'48 (talk) 06:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Dream Focus I am a long term active member of the Article Rescue Squadron, which finds threatened articles and searches for references to prove they meet the Wikipedia standards for Notability. I can remember articles in the past where we needed to look through old English newspapers, so this would be helpful. I have been active in Wikipedia for seven years and eleven months and made over 26 thousand edits. Dream Focus 08:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oh, I'd find this tremendously useful. I've been here ten years with ten thousand edits. More recently I've worked on quite a few articles on "historical" British topics and I'd be helped greatly by getting access to a broader range of newspapers. Here are some articles I've created.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Thincat (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. On Wikipedia since January 2006 with 70,000+ edits, 350+ articles created, 100+ articles substantially expanded, and 60+ DYKs. I work primarily on operas, opera singers, composers, and librettists from the mid-20th century and earlier, but also work on other arts-related topics in those eras, including writers, visual artists, paintings and historic theatres. Access to the archive would be extremely useful for researching biographies as well as reviews of performances, books, exhibitions, etc. Voceditenore (talk) 09:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Just over 41,000 edits having been on the Wiki for nearly five and a half years. 126 GAs, 443 DYKs, 13 FLs and 1 FA. Primarily hoping to use the article to expand 19th century British Football stubs as that's surprisingly hard to get information on. But to be honest, I tend to get very sidetracked in my edits as if I see something interesting while researching something else, I invariably end up doing that instead. :) Miyagawa (talk) 09:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. RHaworth (talk · contribs). I am currently working to bring User:Tonybarlow/sandbox up to mainspace standard. It refers to an article published in the Times. It would be good to find it. There have been and will be other times when access to the archives would be handy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Tom Morris (talk · contribs) — This would be quite useful to have as I've written on British popular culture, LGBT topics and biographies. Admin, 56,000 edits and all the rest. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. MilborneOne (talk · contribs) 90K editor of over 7 years with an interest in aviation and biographical articles would appreciate access to improve and create related articles, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Mattythewhite (talk · contribs) 7+ years of activity, 155,000+ edits, 977 articles created. Edit primarily on association football articles so this would be invaluable for pre-1950s content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Emeraude (talk · contribs) - Active since 2006 with greater than 40,000 edits. Main areas of work on Wikipedia are historical, French culture and politics; for this latter I am especially interested in minor political parties, their members and supporters - previously an area that I researched academically. I am particularly keen to use contemporary reports of such parties/politicians. This area is rarely covered in detail in the press and to write/edit reliably on these topics would be much easier (and acceptable) with access to a wider range of sources. Now retired, I have no other way of accessing such material.
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Apwoolrich (talk · contribs) - Active since 2004. I have written a number of new articles mainly on the history of technology and the biographies of personalities. Currently working on Rees's Cyclopaediaand the musical contributuions of Charles Burney.Apwoolrich (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. FormerIP (talk · contribs) Around 16,000 edits. This looks like it could be a useful resource for creating new content to balance out recentism and to flesh out articles that may lack a news perspective, such as articles on old court cases which currently only use legal sourcing. Formerip (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon! Sadads (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Scott (talk · contribs). This would be useful. — Scott • talk 21:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Scott: Hi Scott: you more than qualify, but based on the articles that you have worked on, it looks like you work mostly on 20th century materials. Most of the BNA collection ends before mid-century. Could you confirm what research agenda you can use the source for? Sadads (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I use tools on a need basis, I don't have an agenda. If you need an example, I've worked a fair bit on Holland House and have quite a lot of material set aside here to expand it with when I have time, along with some related topics about the Whig politicians and writers that used to gather there. — Scott • talk 15:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved, expect a Wikipedia email soon. That was the kind of example I was looking for! Also, I re-looked over the aristocracy articles, etc. which you list on your talk page and can see that some of your work will benefit. Sadads (talk) 16:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Cool! Thank you. — Scott • talk 16:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Scott: since you are on: I am going to send another batch of accounts to be activated soon, so if you fill out the form ASAP. Sadads (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. wvk (talk · contribs). Mainly activ on German Wikipedia. 11.000+ edits. --Wvk (talk) 10:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email shortly, Sadads (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Rodw (talk · contribs) I have 70,000+ edits on the English wikipedia over nearly 10 years (13 FA, 14 FL, 2 FT, 1 FP, 85 GA, 127 DYK) - primarily history, geography, architecture etc articles relating to sites in Somerset and Bristol. In recent work, particularly relating to some of the houses in the area, I would find it useful to have access to Victorian (and earlier) sources, particularly The Times about the owners of sites and events which occurred at them.— Rod talk 12:54, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email shortly, Sadads (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Titodutta (talk · contribs) This looks wonderful. It should be very helpful. --Tito☸Dutta 15:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email shortly, Sadads (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Mainly active in Bengali Wikipedia, where this source could be useful to develop for better Wikipedia. - Suvray (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email shortly, Sadads (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. codrinb (talk · contribs) I frequently contribute to archaeology and history articles, and having access to BNA would allow me to source these articles using academic papers and books on the mentioned topics.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email shortly, Sadads (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Eddaido (talk · contribs) Very useful sources for business histories (big businesses were often small businesses at first) where business events are not reported in metropolitan papers. Have created 74 articles on businesses and their products. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 03:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Acabashi (talk · contribs) I had used British Library Newspapers at Colindale for research many times over the past six years, until it was incorporated into British Library Euston last September. Since the move I have found newspaper research more difficult because of increased time required in accessing documents at the BL, and travel inconvenience. This resource online should allow faster access, to help in particular with my place, church, and historic biog articles, dependent of course on how far they have gone in digitizing. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. User:Manxruler I've created 52 articles and made over 37,000 edits, mostly on historical subjects. Would appreciate access to this. Manxruler (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. User:Lozleader I have been a WP editor for more than 8.5 years, have made over 38,000 edits. I create edit/articles on electoral history and candidates and biographies of various office-holders (among other things). BNA is a good source for winkling out this information.Lozleader (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. User:Martinevans123. Experienced editor with an interest in historical subjects. Would be very useful. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. User:Philg88 Would be extremely useful for research into 19th century British international commerce, an area where I have done a lot of content creation and improvement vis-a-vis Hong Kong and China.  Philg88 ♦talk 07:28, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. User:Snori. I've made 12,000+ edits, over a wide group of articles, and always aim to get good references for anything I do. I see this as mainly useful in the areas of early New Zealand history. I've been in the habit of using the "bare URL style" citations, but I realise that this will need to change for BNA, and I'm confident that I'll manage to do so. Snori (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Snori: Please attach an email account to your user account via the Preferences section; without an email contact route, we cannot issue your account, Sadads (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Email sent, Sadads (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Lajbi (talk · contribs) 21,000 live edits and a member for 9 nine years. My contributions include a wide range of edits. I had created several new articles based on contemporary newspapers (115 articles overall), the most significant ones are related to battles of the French intervention in Mexico and the Interwar period tennis personalities and events. I usually DYK my articles, and thus I am already recognized with one entry in the DYK Hall of Fame. Would appreciate access to the said archives to improve my work. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 21:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you very much. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 16:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Anne Delong 46,000 edits. I am an AfC reviewer and am actively adding references to draft articles. Access to the BNA would be very helpful. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Moorlock (talk · contribs) eager to dig through the archives for more about my favorite otherwise-neglected topics —Moorlock (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. A. Carty (talk · contribs) Since joining Wikipedia in 2007, I have added over 40,000+ edits and 200+ articles. My main interests are the biographies of British Industrialists, scientists, engineers and actors. I am also interested in the history of Britain's industry, railways and armed forces. Access to the BNA would open up a vast research archive. — A. Carty (talk) 22:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Roman Spinner (talk · contribs) I have been editing for nearly 8½ years (since January 2006) on an almost-daily basis and have over 17,700 edits. My article creation extends to film, television and theater topics as well as to history and literature. I would like to use BNA in creating British-oriented articles on these and other topics. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 00:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Chienlit (talk · contribs) Since first editing as a url in 2005 I have completed circa 35,000 edits (20,000 edits under my now permanent masquerade). My gnomish activity ranges across history, science and any subject that catches my interest, often Belle Epoque France and Edwardian Britain. I would like to use BNA for referencing all topics. I am currently trying to organise and clarify the profusion of motor manufacturers (British et al) that traded pre WW1.Chienlit (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) Edited since May 2005, made over 110,000 edits. Mainly working on The Boat Race articles, starting in 1829 and would highly value access to contemporary newspaper reports to enhance each article as only one or two written works (which I own) seem to provide top-level coverage of these early events. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon,Sadads (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Zero0000 (talk · contribs) Edited for more than 12 years, and administrator for more than 10 years. Mostly working on Middle East history. The long involvement of the British in the Middle East makes newspaper archives especially useful for fact-checking. Zerotalk 16:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon,Sadads (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. iantresman (talk · contribs) Have edited for about a decade with 20,000+ edits, and contributed to good articles such as Bradwall, Cerne Abbas Giant and Lobster (magazine). Would like help to do more. --Iantresman (talk) 19:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending when accounts become available, Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon,Sadads (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Demiurge1000 (talk · contribs) I have contributed to English Wikipedia for more than four years, and have contributed more than 24,000 edits. These include significant contributions to 5 featured articles and 19 good articles. I am particularly interested in the types of publications offered by the British Newspaper Archive, in that many of the topics to which I contribute would benefit from references to news sources, including local news sources, from the 19th and early 20th century. Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 12:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. User:Sagaciousphil I often work on historical articles and access to this database would help a great deal. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. User:Eric Corbett I've had to pay for short-term access to this database in the past to help with historical articles, so an account would be very useful. Eric Corbett 16:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. See the conversation at Wikipedia_talk:BNA#Another_attribution_problem, BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. User:The Vintage Feminist. I've made 3,472 edits since joining almost 2 years ago. My main areas of interest is feminist economics and access would help me flesh out some of the BLPs of economists / sociologists / psychologists. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @The Vintage Feminist: most of the newspapers available in the database end before the 1950s (see Wikipedia:BNA/Available newspapers ). Would the database still be of use to you if you are doing mostly contemporary material? Sadads (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @The Vintage Feminist: Please confirm that you still would like access, Sadads (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes please, the study of economic history forms a significant part of feminist economics, e.g. Karl Polanyi. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 06:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. User:Mighty Antar. Experienced editor always looking for access to more original source material to help expand, enhance and generally improve our work. Mighty Antar (talk) 11:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mighty Antar: - based on your edit history: you work mostly on 20th century materials. most of this database's sources terminate before the 1950s (see Wikipedia:BNA/Available newspapers ). Can you please confirm what type of articles you expect to edit with this database and if you still need/want the resource? Sadads (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    My interests are wide and varied, but in general and without attempting to avoid the question, I would hope to contribute to articles where I don't currently have access to a range of source materials. Mighty Antar (talk) 22:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mighty Antar: Could you give an example of a topic or topic area you think you could improve? Sadads (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Local history information that is location specific or obituaries of notable persons not covered by more mainstream literature.Mighty Antar (talk) 22:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Jack1956 (talk · contribs) Since joining Wikipedia in 2007 I have made 45,000+ edits and have started over 550 articles. I am among Wikipedia's 1,000 most active editors. As I work on mainly historical articles access to an historical archive such as the BNA would help me incredibly by giving me access to the original source materials needed to added cites and references for my articles as well as more easily providing me with the facts and evidence I often have to spend a lot of time looking for elsewhere. My access to the BNA would be used extensively and effectively. Thank you for considering me. Jack1956 (talk) 18:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Peter I. Vardy (talk · contribs) I know of the existence of this database, but had been put off by the size of the subscription. Most of my articles are on heritage subjects, especially about churches and country houses, and access to the database would be an invaluable source of information not readily available elsewhere. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. J3Mrs (talk · contribs) The newspaper database should be useful for providing information on the colliery and other articles I have contributed to in the Greater Manchester and Yorkshire areas. I have created more than 100 articles and taken other articles to GA. PS I am only intermittently available until next week. J3Mrs (talk) 19:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. waynejayes (talk · contribs) over 1000 edits active in anglican, naturist and south african (specifically eastern cape) areas. Wayne Jayes 19:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Waynejayes: Most of the newspapers in the database are historical newspapers, (pre-1950). Based on your edit history, you mostly edit contemporary topics: please confirm that the earlier period still would be of use to you, Sadads (talk) 12:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. SamBlob (talk · contribs) I have been editing Wikipedia since December 2005 and have made more than 6,000 edits in the main space of Wikipedia. My main interest is in motor cars and motorcycles, including British motor cars and motor cycles. The motoring sections of Midlands newspapers, including those of Coventry and Birmingham, might provide useful information on these cars and motorcycles, as would similar sections in major London newspapers. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 02:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Did a quick search for vehicle and manufacturing information, and looks like it will be useful. Approved, Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. CutOffTies (talk · contribs) - I am an experienced editor that's been here since 2007, and contribute to many areas: music, sport, history, etc. As I recently moved to Tasmania, Australia I would like to both discover, and then improve the history sections of many Tasmanian articles. Given the British influence in Tasmania (especially for convict history), I feel the BNA's archives would assist me in finding new topics. Thank you --CutOffTies (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Casliber (talk · contribs)...err, been here 8 years...120,000 edits...100 Featured Articles...so I guess you could say I do a bit of content work. Have thought about doing some historical stuff from time to time. Other offerings (JSTOR etc.) I can cover with uni access, this I can't and looks cool. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Rob_Kam (talk · contribs) I've worked on various articles and some on local history. It would be very helpful to have access to the BNA.
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Duffit5 (talk · contribs) I've worked mainly on articles of people associated with Norwich, UK. It would be useful to have access to the BNA, particularly for 20th-century biographical entries. Duffit talk 13:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. MeegsC (talk · contribs) I've been an editor since 2007, working primarily in the biological sciences. Our biographies of ornithologists, zoologists, naturalist, etc. are woefully inadequate, and having access (particularly to obituaries) would undoubtedly help us to improve some of those. I also occasionally write articles about National Hunt racing (jockeys, trainers, horses, etc.) and would find newspaper accounts useful for those as well. MeegsC (talk) 13:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Mendaliv (talk · contribs) I believe access to this service would be greatly beneficial to my recent increase of coverage of international law topics, particularly of the international incidents that lead to them and especially on public reactions to such incidents mentioned in the news. I have over 28,000 edits across a wide range of topical areas, which includes reference verification. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Mike Christie (talk · contribs) I mostly work on content and have written 40+ FAs. I'd like to get access to old business news reports -- e.g. this company was formed by the merger of these two; this person was promoted to CEO; this company went bankrupt. I do a lot of work on mid-twentieth century magazines, and I am often hampered on the business side by the lack of sources for the mundane details about the companies who owned the magazines. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Jellyman (talk · contribs) Active on Wikipedia since 2005, with around 6000 edits. I recently took a one month trial subscription with the BNA where I have found a lot of useful information. I do much of my editing on football related articles, particularly Dundee United F.C. - the involvement of DC Thomson with BNA means that Dundee newspapers are particularly well represented. I would also be using it for content related to local history, sports and rail transport (particularly Glasgow and Derby areas). Jellyman (talk) 23:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jellyman: Please activate the email function in your preferences, without which we cannot distribute the account to you, Sadads (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops, thought I'd already done that! Sorted now. Jellyman (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. John M Baker (talk · contribs) Access would be extremely useful to me for my work on articles about word and phrase origins. In addition, I am an active participant at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange and share articles there with requesting editors. In my experience, while other editors often have access to journal databases such as JSTOR, few seem to have access to newspaper databases other than Highbeam. John M Baker (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Warren Whyte (talk · contribs) I would very much like to increase the coverage of early C20 architecture, post-war development and automotive business, and regional coverage is patchy in the national newspapers, especially Bucks/Northants/Midlands area. Warren (talk) 23:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Warren Whyte: Please activate the email function in your preferences, without which we cannot distribute the account to you, Sadads (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Viswaprabha (talk · contribs) I am an editor at various Wikipedias including en but predominantly on Indic Wikis. Access to this library will be much useful to me as I am in constant search for authentic references and citations pertaining to history, science, biographies and Indo-European languages apart from other topics. Thank you. ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭtalk 00:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Viswaprabha: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Keri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Content editor since July 2009. A large proportion of my edits relate to less 'popular' topics that predate the internet and access to quality newspaper archives is often the only way to research, reliably verify and reference resulting articles. Keri (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Additional: examples include Murder of Suzanne Capper and Murder of Teresa de Simone, both researched, created and taken to GA status using archived newspapers. Previously I had access to an archive through my local library. This service has now been withdrawn by the county library service due to budget cuts. Keri (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Keri: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Siegfried Nugent (talk · contribs) I have been a contributor since January 2010 and since then have many page creations and GA-rated articles under my belt. My interests in editing are varied but a common theme comes back to the British Empire as well as my major interests in NSW politics, LGBT, educational, military, royal, vice-regal, academic, cultural, historical and Australian politics articles. Hopefully you will see the value of my access as i see the value added to my work through access. Thanks Siegfried Nugent (talk) 12:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Siegfried Nugent: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Siegfried Nugent: Please activate user-emails via the settings, without the ability to email you, we can't collect your user information, Sadads (talk) 22:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. send it through. Regards, Siegfried Nugent (talk) 07:30, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Edwardx (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an active creator of content (641 new articles, 91 DYKs), especially British biographies, and am particularly interested in newspaper obituaries. Edwardx (talk) 19:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Edwardx: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. This is Paul (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've been here since April 2008 and have over 60,000 edits. Mostly I tend to work on articles about British politics, current affairs, television, film, popular music and British crime. This would be very useful for things like the early years in British television (which are often difficult to source), movies and popular artists from the 40s and 50s, as well as notorious cases from the past. Also I'd be interested in tackling recent history articles such as 1952 London Smog and North Sea Flood of 1953, and finding something on the early years of the Royal National College for the Blind. As the 100 places seem to be almost full though, I'm happy to wait for the trial period to run its course and join the next round. This is Paul (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @This is Paul: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Lfstevens (talk · contribs) - Hi. I have edited more than 10k articles. I am a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. My substantive edits focus on batteries, materials science, genetic engineering, marine subjects and Hawaii. Many of these are poorly cited - BNA would be a big help. I have started 50+ articles on such subjects. Thanks!
    Approved @Lfstevens: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. NativeForeigner (talk · contribs) For some time I've been looking at expanding articles on the post-colonial history of the United Kingdom & Commonwealth members (specifically Canada). Judging by the first few pages of [8] it would be highly useful. NativeForeigner Talk 06:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @NativeForeigner: you have received one of the unclaimed accounts from this round. Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Ealdgyth (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - for work on British horses and horseracing prior to the mid-century mark. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC) - added - Over 80,000 edits, 50+FAs, 100+GAs. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Ealdgyth: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Florentyna (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 150k edits. Writing about historical UK sportspeople and historical UK sports events. --Florentyna (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Florentyna: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Keithbob (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) -- almost 40k edits, 20 articles and have overhauled 60+ articles. Content driven editor, NPP etc. Could use some access to Euro sources. (see here)-- — Keithbob • Talk • 23:30, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Keithbob: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Richerman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) In 7 years I have made almost 18,000 edits and created a number of articles on diverse subjects (see my user page). I use the archive at my local library but have found it rather limited. Richerman (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Richerman: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Ritchie333 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have taken over 25 articles to good article status and access to the BNA has become increasingly desirable as I have started working on geography articles in Kent (such as Dartford Crossing). I have seen several citations to articles held in the BNA when conducting GA reviews (e.g.: Talk:All Saints' Church, Runcorn/GA1), and it's frustrating to not be able to check the factual accuracy of an article as well as I would like. I am in regular full-time employment and have no university access at all. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Ritchie333: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Tintin1107 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a Wikipedian since 2005 and have around 14,000 edits. Most of my edits are in cricket for which BNA will be very useful. Tintin 23:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Tintin1107: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Asav (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor since 2005, approx 20,000 edits on en, de and no. Additionally OTRS member for several years, currently on hold. Active patroller. I do a lot of reference adding/checking, so this access would be most useful, also because wp.no relies heavily on English language sources. Asav | Talk 02:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Asav: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Murma174 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm admin and bureaucrat on the North Frisian wikpedia and working on historical topics sometimes. --Murma174 (talk) 07:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)--Murma174 (talk) 07:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Murma174: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you very much! Registering was easy. --Murma174 (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Cloudz679 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Experienced editor, 75,000+ edits, active in content generation and expansion connected with UK-related articles. C679 10:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Cloudz679: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Rapsar (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an active user of Turkish Wikipedia and made over 200.000 contributions. Accesing this database would be very useful to improve articles.--Rapsar (talk) 11:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Rapsar: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Diego Grez (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) A great tool that would benefit my work here on Wikipedia --Diego Grez (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Diego Grez: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Yngvadottir (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor since 2008, edit on a wide variety of topics (partly in response to AfD), hampered on UK topics by not being in the UK and hence having no access to UK library hard copies. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Yngvadottir: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Worm That Turned (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor since 2008, have actively used BNA before it was cool (paid for by WMUK microgrant). Found it to be one of the most useful resources in the areas I end up working WormTT(talk) 13:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Worm That Turned: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Nick (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been working on categorising and recording listed buildings and monuments in Scotland, having access to newspaper articles on the buildings, architects, sponsors and/or subjects of memorials may prove very useful in categorisation and eventual article creation. I've written fairly extensively about numerous Scottish topics in the past and would expect access to this resource will prove beneficial in expanding existing content too. Nick (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Nick: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. PamD (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit a wide range of articles, predominantly about the UK, some found while stub-sorting, others by various random routes; I've created a variety of articles on miscellaneous topics, again UK-biased. Access to the newspapers would be useful when trying to source articles, whether my own creations or those of others. PamD 22:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @PamD: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Shudde (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I mainly contribute to sport-related articles, and have been focusing on biographies lately (e.g. Thomas Ellison & Arthur Gould (rugby union)). Access to British newspapers would definitely help with finding reliable sources for similar biographies. -- Shudde talk 23:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Shudde: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. NealeFamily (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I mainly work on New Zealand historical based articles but access to British newspapers would assist in provided background for Biographies of early settlers, events, and shipping -- NealeFamily (talk) 23:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @NealeFamily: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Ochiwar (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor since last year in Wikiproject Medicine and AfC. Have created a quite a number of articles in my short time here with 3500+ edits and two Good Articles. Also interested in topics concerning Nigeria, Africa and the Commonwealth. Access would help in sourcing references Ochiwar (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Ochiwar: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. mhhossein (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm active on the English Wikipedia where I edit Middle east related articles besides Islamic ones. Some of the current events need to be rooted and I need to have access to archives in order to enhance the quality of the related articles. Mhhossein (talk) 07:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Mhhossein: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Perry Middlemiss (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit content in Wikipedia relating to Australian literature and cricket. I am particularly interested in Australians who have worked in the UK, or British-born people who later lived in Australia (either as writers or sports-people) and believe that access to the British Newspaper Archive will open up many avenues of research in these areas. It will also complement the work I currently undertake as an editor on the National Library of Australia's digitised newspaper archive Trove. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Perry Middlemiss: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Perry Middlemiss (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Many thanks. I'm looking forward to wandering the dusty halls of British print.Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. AnonNep (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I usually focus on Australian and English history topics and have access to the UK Times database with my Library Card but it only covers 'big' stories and it would be extremely useful to have access to a range of London and regional papers (especially for Lincolnshire/Yorkshire). AnonNep (talk) 06:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @AnonNep: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Bjenks (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work on historical, biographical and literary subjects and punctiliously seek to refine sources in both existing and new articles. My library cards provide only limited/partial access to non-free archives, so additional options would be very welcome.Bjenks (talk) 05:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Bjenks: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Tim riley (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Editor since 2005; created more than 200 articles; taken more than 20 articles through to FA. Main subject fields: classical music, history, theatre. Access to the archive would be particularly valuable for the last of the three. Tim riley talk 09:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Tim riley: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Chris55 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Most of my edits deal with historical subjects and I've often wanted better access to contemporary sources. Maybe nearly 6,000 edits since 2005 is less than some but many take quite a bit of research. Chris55 (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Chris55: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've created nearly 100,000 articles since 2006. I'd find this resource tremendously valuable. I'd be extremely grateful to be given access to this and I'm sure I'd put it to great use!.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Dr. Blofeld: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  122. kbabej (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an active user on the English Wiki and mostly focus on biographies. A lot of the people I have focused on are contemporary, because media access to older articles is limited. Having access to older material, I would love to flesh out English non-contemporary biographies and other topics. --Kbabej (talk) 00:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Kbabej: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 63K edits and a generalist and this resource will be of great use.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Pharaoh of the Wizards: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. ThaddeusB (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have recently been on a couple month break due to real life work. That is winding down now and I have previously contributed a ton of content to Wikipedia. I am specifically requesting access to this resource as bringing Johnny Leach to GA is one of my projects I was wokring on before my break, but would also no doubt find it useful on other biographies. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @ThaddeusB: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Harrias (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work primarily on English cricket articles so access to british newspaper archives would be invaluable. I have been reasonably inactive over the last year since the birth of my daughter, but I am looking to get back into it again now. Harrias talk 09:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Harrias: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Northernhenge (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) A lot of my editing sessions start because I've found incomplete or incorrect references and I try to improve them. This resource would help a lot. Also, I'm interested in urban history but have been struggling to find sources that are not simply restating or summarising anecdotal tales from travellers, and many of those seem to have been armchair travellers at best. --Northernhenge (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Northernhenge: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Danimations (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I do a lot of work on mining, industrial and natural history subjects. This access would allow me to develop pages of content beyond the borders of my home country of Australia. BNA is especially relevant due to Britain's colonisation of Australia and the ongoing relationship between these two countries and their shared history.Danimations (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Danimations: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Bmcln1 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) – Two of my particular interests are to pick out UK writers unrepresented or under-represented on English Wikipedia and create or expand their entries – I think this source may prove useful for discovering and checking certain types of biographical information – and to expand shorter entries on places and other geographical features in the UK. I live in Hungary, where normal public library services in these areas are not easily available. My edit total over eight years is approaching 13,000. There is a list of the pages I have started and substantially expanded on my user page. Bmcln1 (talk) 08:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Bmcln1: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have created over 9,000 articles, and contribute to a variety of topics on Wikipedia. I have contributed to over 100 DYKs, and have helped many articles reach GA status. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Thine Antique Pen: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Fiddlersmouth (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Working on Freemasonry, where available material is often scarce, contradictory, or deliberately misleading. Access to contemporary material, especially from the 19th century, would be more than useful. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 11:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Fiddlersmouth: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Racconish (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I contribute since 2008. Above 11,000 contributions to WPen, 29,000 to WPfr, 56,000 altogether. I am an active mediator on the French project and the access would help suggest consensus orientated improvements. Thanks, — Racconish ✉ 13:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Racconish: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Brianboulton (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Contributor since 2007, c.68,000 edits. Major featured article contributor: music, politics, literature etc. A wider range of newspaper sources would provide a useful addition to scholarly material. Brianboulton (talk) 09:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Brianboulton: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Kmhkmh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) active since 2007 with > 45k edits mostly in en.wp and de.wp. Access would be helpful for verification/proof reading for a wide variety of subjects and biographies in particular as well as the extension of articles or the creation of new ones. Lastly it useful for helping out on de:WP:BIBA and WP:REX Kmhkmh (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Kmhkmh: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. jxm (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm particularly interested in editing and verification of late 19th/early 20th century Irish/British labour and social movements, Marxism, industrialisation, etc., as well as historical fact-checking and clarification of claims of scientific validity, especially fringe theories. Tnx! jxm (talk) 16:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Jxm: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Rosiestep (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a sysop with over 80,000 edits; I've created thousands of articles since 2007 and over 1,000 of them have appeared in the DYK section of the mainpage. This resource would be valuable for creating additional articles. Thank you for considering me. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Rosiestep: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. K8 fan (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I have made considerable contributions to the articles on Joan Pujol Garcia and Kate Bush, and I believe I could do more with access to this archive. Thank you for your consideration. K8 fan (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @K8 fan: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Cpt.a.haddock (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit articles primarily on Indian history and believe that access to pre-independence newspapers of Britain will be very useful as a reference tool. Thanks. --Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Cpt.a.haddock: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. BengaliHindu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit content on topics related to West Bengal and Bangladesh, Partition of Bengal, Bangladesh Liberation War etc. It would be helpful if I can refer to the British newspaper archives and add content from neutral point of view. BengaliHindu (talk) 07:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @BengaliHindu: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  139. shrikanthv (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I usually contribute in writing biographies of prominent Indo-UK based personnels and currently am facing problems & in need for information and citation and also getting accurate information on the historical events from British -India period . would be interested to have this access to contribute better.
    Approved @Shrikanthv: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Nigej (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active in Wikipedia:WikiProject Golf. Over 7,500 edits. Much effort this year on Open Championships and Ryder Cups. Access to the BNA would be a great help. Nigej (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Nigej: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  141. lentower (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Would help me improve articles on people who are British or work or are reported on in Britain, e.g. touring artists and musicians, and world famous people. — Lentower (talk) 00:39, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Lentower: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  142. BoBoMisiu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) — I will use it for early 20th century articles. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 01:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @BoBoMisiu: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chris troutman: I registered yesterday but the registration threw an error and that I will be contacted. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 23:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Jonathansammy (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit content on India related topics. Other areas of interest are South Asian diaspora, Leicestershire and Chemistry. Access to archives will be of great help in improving articles in these subject areas.Jonathansammy (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Jonathansammy: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Uhlan (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi, I regularly create articles about military history and I would much appreciate using the archive to get more information about the World War 2 articles I have created. Uhlan talk 03:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Uhlan: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Ruby2010 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active in content creation and have plans to continue expanding biographies of British peeresses of the 19th and 20th centuries (see my to-do list here as well as some of my featured content). This newspaper access would help immeasurably. Thank you! Ruby 2010/2013 03:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Ruby2010: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Andrew Davidson (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I regularly attend editathons and create content about Britain for which this resource would help. Recent examples include Albert Strange, Catherine Marshall (suffragette) and the Congregational Memorial Hall. Andrew D. (talk) 10:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Andrew Davidson: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Bogger (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) — I will use it for articles relating to Ireland (including Northern Ireland). —Bogger (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Bogger: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. peaky76 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Wikipedia editor since 2010; mainly horseracing, particularly interested in 19th century jockey biographies so obits would be useful; also planning to do more local history articles related to Yorkshire and Edinburgh Peaky76 (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Peaky76: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014
  149. Gatoclass (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been a registered user since 2006 and an admin since 2008, in that time I have made over 60,000 edits and authored over 300 articles including about 180 DYKs. Many of my articles would easily be GA if not FA class though I have rarely submitted them to either process. I have been somewhat inactive for the last three years due to increased off-Wiki responsibilities, however, I now have the opportunity to return to a higher level of editing and am looking forward to doing so. Currently, my main areas of interest are ships, shipbuilding, and US businesses and biographies, but I would love to do more work on similar British topics given access to the right sources. Gatoclass (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Gatoclass: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Twobells (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor in defence and security intelligence along with British and American history, BLP and information technology. I plan to use the BNA to edit and create articles related to my fields of interest and to be frank, BNA will help greatly in my search for legitimate citations in the public domain that are usually either subscription-based or classified. Twobells (talk) 14:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Twobells: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Farrtj (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hello I am in the top 2,500 most prolific Wikipedians. My principal interests are in business history. I have created 16 Good Articles. I hope to use the resource to improve articles. Tom (talk) 01:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Farrtj: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Ashwin147 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 2,200 edits, 126 new articles, 2 years and counting. Interested in modern Indian history. Access to the BNA will greatly help with my wiki activities. Also, my current wiki break ends in a week's time, so I shall have even more time for new articles and upgrading existing wiki articles. Ashwin147 (talk) 17:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Ashwin147: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Egghead06 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active for over eight years, 34,400 edits, 340+ new articles. I mostly edit in the world of football and popular music. I am most interested in people and events from an era before widespread (or any) internet coverage. I have only recently completed articles on 1960s music and 1930s football. There is much more from these eras I would like to write. Access to BNA would greatly help.--Egghead06 (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Egghead06: You have been approved for an account. Expect an e-mail from me shortly with further instructions. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Headhitter (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've created nearly 200 articles, a great deal of them about buildings and historical figures (architects, artists etc) in London. Wherever possible I provide reliable citations but some information (such as might be found in a newspaper obituary) I am currently unable to source online. Having access to the BNA might help me to expand these articles and develop new ones. Headhitter (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Headhitter: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  155. worldbruce (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My maintainence and AfC efforts bring me in contact with a wide variety of articles that need work on their verifiability and sources. Access to BNA could make my work more efficient and allow me to help more articles more completely. Worldbruce (talk) 04:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Worldbruce: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  156. jkokavec (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi, I'd appreciate BNA access so I can continue my work documenting the history of islands (for example: Smooth Island (Tasmania)). Many thanks, Jkokavec (talk) 01:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jkokavec: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Jefferyseow (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit entries related to 19th Century British Malaya (the Federated Malay States, Unfederated Malay States, and the Straits Settlements, especially Penang and Singapore). Sources are hard to find and access to BNA's archived newspapers would help.
    @Jefferyseow: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Prioryman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've written extensively about British history in a variety of featured, good and DYK articles and intend to continue doing so! This resource would be extremely useful in allowing me to use material from British regional newspapers, which represent a big gap in the material to which I currently have access. Prioryman (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Prioryman: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Nsaa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), Nsaa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), actively use it to confirm added material, citations both on English and Norwegian Wikipedia. It may also be useful in my OTRS work. Access to BNA will be a great help. Nsaa (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nsaa: Could you explain how this resource will help with OTRS? I've never heard that as a rationale. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nsaa: Were you still interested in this resource? If so, can you explain how this resource would be useful to you? And how this resource would affect OTRS work? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I've helped out people to gather references when asked for help and this looks like a splendid resource to do that in some cases. I've used a similar service covering Norwegian newspaper articles a lot (http://www.retriever-info.com/) Nsaa (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nsaa: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Skr15081997 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I need this resource for my work on Indian history and early British and American films. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 12:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Skr15081997: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Bazj (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'd like to go over a bunch of historical articles I've worked on in the past and add detail & sources. Bazj (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bazj: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  162. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit high-page view articles and recently was a co-winner in the 2015 Core Contest for revisions to English language that brought that article to good article status. I especially like to edit articles on psychology and note that many pioneers in psychological research, for example Francis Galton and Cyril Burt, are likely to be covered by news articles in the scope of this resource. I share citations to sources that are reliable sources by Wikipedia guidelines with other editors in online bibliographies in my user space, for example the Intelligence citations bibliography and the Anthropology and human biology citations bibliography. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @WeijiBaikeBianji: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Iantheimp (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am currently, slowly but surely starting articles for all competitors who have competed in the Summer Olympics i believe this could help me also expand stubs on the same project, especially when i start on the older Olympics. Thank you for your time. Iantheimp (talk) 18:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Iantheimp: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Cassianto (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) FAC bug has bitten again with one planned in a few weeks. I used to have a subscription which I paid for and managed to get four FA's out of it; alas, it has since lapsed owing to real life. I believe I fit the desired criteria. CassiantoTalk 16:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cassianto: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  165. FunkyCanute (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Creating and developing historical articles, many of which require access to offline content. For example, I'm working on a series of articles on international rugby players killed in WWI; as well as ongoing efforts on British colonial history. FunkyCanute (talk) 22:17, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @FunkyCanute: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Iridescent (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Currently doing a lot of articles on 19th century English painting, many of which rely heavily on contemporary newspaper reviews to illustrate how works were received on their initial reception, which is often at great variance from how they're viewed in books which are written with the benefit of hindsight. (Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm is a good example of the kind of thing I mean.) – iridescent 19:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Iridescent: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. TLSuda (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Ceoil (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Mostly edit on 14/15th c Northern art, but deeply interested in mid 20th century British figurative painting; Sutherland, Bacon, Freud, Auerbach etc; access to contemporary notes, gossip and reviews would be hugely distracting and invaluable. Frankly I often reference them second hand, without full context. Ceoil (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ceoil: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. TLSuda (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ceoil: Are you still interested in this resource? We haven't seen a reply come through. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Zigzig20s (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - In the same manner that I use newspapers.com for US newspapers, this would be extremely useful to find obituaries of notable businesspeople, philanthropists, academics, aristocrats, etc., from the UK. Immediate projects would be expanding biographies of members of the Bevan family, co-founders of Barclays Bank. I would also use those articles to reference articles about historic buildings and companies in the UK. I create articles almost every day.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zigzig20s: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zigzig20s: Are you still interested in this resource? We haven't seen a reply come through. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. I did not receive any e-mails about it. I was just double-checking this page to let you know actually...Zigzig20s (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I've just sent you a new one. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 13:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. I've just signed up on the website and sent the Google form.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    User:TLSuda: Hello there. I don't think this has worked. I can log in but it says, "only three pages remaining," and I did not receive another e-mail after I sent you the Google form. Can you please update my account?Zigzig20s (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zigzig20s: I'm awaiting the upgrading of your account. As soon as it is finished, I will let you know. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Dweller (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I help develop quality articles, mostly on British topics like English football, world cricket and Welsh castles. See User:Dweller/Featured. This facility would be supremely helpful for finding information and completing the zillions of references I need to do. A lot of the topics I choose to edit about pre-date the 1950s, for example The Invincibles, which I helped make a Featured Topic. I also have a great interest in Ted Alletson, prominent before WWI and most of whose exploits would have been in county cricket, which is perfect for newspaper research. --Dweller (talk) 10:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dweller: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Derek_Andrews (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am interested in most things related to UK, particularly social and industrial history, see User:Derek_Andrews#Wiki_Interests. Recently been working on Portgordon and now need refs to further improve Gas Stokers' Strike. I'm a lapsed founder member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset and access to newspaper archives might help me contribute further on this project.Derek Andrews (talk) 12:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Derek Andrews: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda:It has been three weeks and I haven't received any word after submitting the Google form. Derek Andrews (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Derek Andrews: You should've had access already. I'll see if I can find out what is going on ASAP. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda:I'm in and have unlimited access. I guess I missed an email somewhere along the line. Sorry, should have tried to sign in first. Derek Andrews (talk) 21:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Samwalton9 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would particularly be interested in using this access for my current project to improve Liverpool Overhead Railway articles. Sam Walton (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Samwalton9: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers TLSuda (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Euryalus (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - my principal topic areas are eighteenth century Royal Navy vessels, European exploration of the Pacific, and Australian colonial settlement 1788-1800. If granted access, would use it to expand articles in these fields, especially RN vessels whose movements were fairly extensively recorded in contemporary newspapers. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Euryalus: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Afterbrunel (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit articles on UK industrial archaeology, and in particular the development of railways in the nineteenth century; contemporary newspapers are an invaluable resource for establishing developments at the time, particularly nuanced factors that do not always get recorded in other easily available resources. Afterbrunel (talk) 11:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Afterbrunel: Approved Expect an email shortly for further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  174. code16 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 1,213 edits (+ created 1 article recently). Active in the following areas: WikiProject Islam, Biographies, Military History/Warfare/Technology, Pakistan (among others less active in.) If you look at my recent contributions to this featured article, I created a new category and added more than 10 scholarly sources, making it one of the best sourced categories on the featured article. Newspaper access would also greatly help cross-checking and verification, also expansion of certain content I'm involved with right now with the Jinnah article, as debate has gone on regarding a few British papers published in the 40s that are not available, but may be searchable with this access. The article I created Ideas of Ghulam Ahmed Pervez is also very well sources for a new article, with over 30 citations. cӨde1+6 LogicBomb! 12:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Code16: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Chuangzu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been active editing on Wikipedia since 2006, my main area is Chinese Martial Arts and Taoism in the United Kingdom, in particular the history of the Lee style T'ai Chi and the author Chee Soo, I am also interested in the history of West Penwith in Cornwall, United Kingdom, where I live miles from the nearest University or Library which is why I conduct research using the internet.Chuangzu (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chuangzu: I see that you've applied for many of our wonderful resources. I just want to make sure that you have the need and use for the British Newspaper Archive. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda:I would like access to the British Newspaper Archive because my research is mainly historical and is based around pages related to the UK.Chuangzu (talk) 20:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chuangzu: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  176. DaltonCastle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a veteran editor with a wide range of topics I write about. Chief among them are politics, political corruption, human rights, law, history, corporate finance, & economics. I would love to have access to BNA to provide additional resources for page creations! Let me know what more you need to know! Thank you for this opportunity! DaltonCastle (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @DaltonCastle: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  177. John (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I regularly create, audit and review articles on the 19th and 20th century. I would find this access useful. --John (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @John: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Zezen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing since 2010 (and also before, as an IP contributor). I specialize in social history of Central Europe. A number of my edits require sourcing through archival newspaper content, unavailable in archive.org, etc. , so I had to give up on expanding the created or modified articles for the lack of verifiable refs, alas. Zezen (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zezen: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Robminchin (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have recently been editing articles on English 19th century university history. While many articles on the foundation of the London colleges & universities are in journals that have appeared on Google Books, regional papers (e.g. Durham Advertiser, an important source for the University of Durham) are only available through the BNA. Robminchin (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Robminchin: Email needs to be enabled on your account for use of this resource. If you are still interested, please let me know when you have it enabled. If you need help enabling email, start first at WP:EMAIL. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Robminchin (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Sorry, I thought I'd done that. Hopefully I've managed it this time. Robminchin (talk) 00:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda: Just to confirm, yes I am still interested. Robminchin (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Robminchin: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Curlymanjaro (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I intend to use BNA in order to reliably reference schools in the Nottinghamshire area, of which many currently lack cited material. Curlymanjaro (talk) 14:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Curlymanjaro: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Alexander Tendler (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am very interested in English history. Until now, almost all my contributions were undisputed. Thank you. --Alexander Tendler (talk) 11:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Alexander Tendler: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Lugnad (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My main interest is Irish Maritime History imar. I used to find good information in old newspapers in my local public library. That meant going to the library. I am not as mobile as I was. It would be great to have access from home. Thanks Lugnad (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lugnad: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  183. JASpencer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I add lots of citations to by-election articles, and will probably need local papers at some point wen I run out of other references. JASpencer (talk) 19:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @JASpencer: Approved. Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active user since 2012 in portuguese wikipedia and sometimes in english. I am studying independently the history of beer in Brazil and I think that I would use the sources on BNA since England's beer influenced a lot the brewery in Brazil during sec XIX.--Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 18:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vonoserbizky Spartacus: Email needs to be enabled on your account for use of this resource. If you are still interested, please let me know when you have it enabled. If you need help enabling email, start first at WP:EMAIL. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda: I believe it`s enabled. Could you check again? Cheers--Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 16:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vonoserbizky Spartacus: Approved So it is/was. I was trying to email you at the pt.wiki that you listed as your home wiki. I've just sent an email. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Old approved renewals[edit]

  1. Michig (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription appears to have expired yesterday despite an email from BNA a while back stating that it would automatically renew. I have made extensive use of BNA in the last 12 months, allowing me to create articles on many early 20th century British boxers among other areas, so another 12 months would be much appreciated. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 08:23, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Michig: Approved However, please be aware there will be a delay in processing access requests because of summer holidays. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Thincat (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has also expired after 1 year although I don't seem to have had an email saying it would renew. I was accepted as #37 at Wikipedia:BNA/Approved and have used BNA in several articles, for example [9][10][11] Thincat (talk) 12:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thincat: Approved However, please be aware there will be a delay in processing access requests because of summer holidays. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Tony Holkham (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hoping I can have a renewal now my 1 year subscription has expired. I have used BNA quite a bit to improve Pembrokeshire and RNLI articles and would like to continue. Thanks. Tony Holkham (Talk) 22:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tony Holkham: Approved However, please be aware there will be a delay in processing access requests because of summer holidays. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: How's it going? Any chance of a renewal shortly - after a summer wikibreak I'm keen to get going again. Cheers. Tony Holkham (Talk) 22:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tony Holkham: It should have been processed already - can you check your account to confirm? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: Doh, I hadn't checked recently. All is well, thanks and apologies. Tony Holkham (Talk) 08:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jeff5102 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Last year I used the BNA, and it worked fantastic when using it for, among others, the 1931 Menshevik Trial, and the Charles Harvey Combe-article. Therefore, I would like to continue my BNA-subscribtion for another year. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 09:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jeff5102: Approved However, please be aware there will be a delay in processing access requests because of summer holidays. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Struway (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Another one whose subscription has expired... I've used BNA in creating/improving footballer bios e.g. the GA Albert Bonass, GA nom James Crumley, Dick Healey (footballer), Mick Connaboy, and numerous shorter ones, and would like to continue. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 21:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Struway: Approved However, please be aware there will be a delay in processing access requests because of summer holidays. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: Thanks. But it looks like I messed up and left the "2" off my username: should be Struway2 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). There won't be any live email associated with the long-dead Struway-without-the-2 account. Sorry to be a nuisance. Struway2 (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Struway2: For all renewal requests I used the email associated with the initial application, which in your case appears to have been that of the Struway2 account. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Shyamal (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) The last year of subscription was extremely useful and fruitful although I have not kept count of the BNA citations that I added. The obituaries have been especially helpful. Shyamal (talk) 12:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Shyamal: Approved However, please be aware there will be a delay in processing access requests because of summer holidays. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Carrite (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Looks like I've expired. This has had a bit of functionality for me but hasn't been even 1/20th as useful as Newspapers.com I will leave it to your discretion whether to renew me or not — I suppose the question is whether there is a queue for subscriptions or whether they are in surplus. Thanks. Carrite (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Carrite: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ad Orientem (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have found BNA to be somewhat helpful in various projects, however, and to be honest, I have gotten a lot more mileage out of the Library of Congress online newspaper archive, which is also happily free. So while I would like to keep the BNA subscription, I don't want it to be at the expense of someone who has a stronger need. Please consider me if there are extra/unwanted subscriptions. Otherwise give mine to someone who will use it more extensively. Thanks... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:30, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ad Orientem: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tmol42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have found access to the newspaper archive useful in adding more 'ephemeral' information to settlement articles that history books etc tend to pass by and occaisionally to biographies when filling in dates and events, obit details etc. Hopefully over the next 12 months the BNA will be further enhanced by more early 20th century editions. Thanks to all those at Wikipedia and BNA who have negotiated this facility. Tmol42 (talk) 23:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tmol42: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Eddaido (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Yes please, I would like to renew. I have used it to confirm a number of things by press reports though it does not have the ease of use of other better known newspaper archives. But its good to be able to check things. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 05:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Eddaido: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Philg88 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Renewal please. This has been an excellent resource across a wide spectrum of articles. In particular, this couldn't have been created without it.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Philg88: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Charles Matthews (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Very useful resource, giving me a chance to tackle research issues that would otherwise probably remain out of reach. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Charles Matthews: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. John M Baker (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My account appears to have expired, and I would like to renew. I found this to be a useful access to British newspaper sources. John M Baker (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @John M Baker: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rodw (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I think my account expired on 7 July. I have used BNA for various articles about places/buildings etc in Somerset and Bristol and would appreciate an extension.— Rod talk 16:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rodw: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Apwoolrich (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've used it extensively for my work on Rees's Cyclopaedia. It's a most valuable resource. May I renew, please? Apwoolrich (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Apwoolrich: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jason Rees (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I have enjoyed access to this resource over the last year and would be grateful for another years access.Jason Rees (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jason Rees: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Cccefalon (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Please renew my account. It'a great ressource. --Cccefalon (talk • contribs) 10:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cccefalon: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Sitush (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Renewal, please. I've used this resource a lot, including but by no means limited to an article that was featured in the BNA blog, for a GA (St John's Church, Manchester) and for one that is presently in draft but should be live soon (User:Sitush/whitehead, which probably would qualify as GA if I remove the FindMyPast stuff). - Sitush (talk) 04:32, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sitush: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rupert Clayton (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Please renew my BNA account. I have found this very useful over the past year. Hoping to have time to use it more fully in the coming year. Rupert Clayton (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rupert Clayton: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. J3Mrs (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Please renew my BNA account. Extremely useful for local history topics. J3Mrs (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @J3Mrs: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Miyagawa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) As with others, my account has expired. I found it extremely useful over the course of the last year and have used it on numerous articles. Miyagawa (talk) 07:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Miyagawa: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Sagaciousphil (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Please renew my account for this excellent resource which I've frequently used. Sagaciousphil - Chat 07:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sagaciousphil: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Titodutta (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Jstor and this BNA -- these are very useful tool, very helpful and useful, please renew my subscription if possible. --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Titodutta: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Philafrenzy (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Please renew. I have been using it. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Philafrenzy: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Wolbo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription appears to have expired. I have made extensive use of BNA in the last year, mainly to improve sourcing of tennis articles. Renewal would be appreciated.--Wolbo (talk) 01:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Wolbo: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Peter I. Vardy (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has just expired. It's a useful source, and I should be grateful if it could be renewed, please. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 07:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Peter I. Vardy: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. BrownHairedGirl (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has just expired. I found it very useful for articles on 19th century British and Irish politics (e.g. Edward Henry Cooper), so it would be great if it could be renewed. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:38, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @BrownHairedGirl: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. emeraude (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) As above. Subscription was extremely useful in creating a number of biographical articles on late 19th century MPs. Emeraude (talk) 09:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Emeraude: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Moorlock (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Recently noticed my subscription has expired; would appreciate it if I could continue to use your useful resource. -Moorlock (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Moorlock: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) As all the above, I have recently discovered it's expired, I found it very helpful on The Boat Race articles and would love to have it back to get Alf Ramsey up to FA standards. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @The Rambling Man: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Waynejayes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has expired, I would be very grateful if it could be renewed, Thanks Wayne Jayes (talk) 20:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Waynejayes: Approved Your renewal request has been approved and will be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mattythewhite (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has expired. I would find renewal particularly useful in expanding Bootham Crescent, which I intend to take to WP:FAC. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mattythewhite: Approved I've put in your your renewal. This can take up to 2-3 days, but will likely be processed soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jellyman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has expired and I would like to request a renewal. I have found BNA useful for improving articles relating to sport and local history topics. Jellyman (talk) 17:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jellyman: Approved I've put in for your renewal. You should have access again soon. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Billreid (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Have more than 6000 edits mostly in article space but these have tailed off of late due to other influences but this will change in near future. I was the main editor on the article Morayshire Railway and need to complete a few blanks and hope the papers Aberdeen Journal, Elgin Courant, Elgin Courier and Inverness Courier can supply these. I have begun researching the article Inverness and Aberdeen Junction Railway with a view to expanding it and I think these newspapers and maybe some others would also be beneficial. Bill Reid | (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Billreid: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:24, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gasheadsteve (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been an editor here for more than nine years and have made over 7,500 edits and created 191 articles in that time. I am planning using the BNA subscription to work on articles about the history and geography of the Bristol area, especially those related to the local sports teams. I'm currently working on the Bristol derby article, but at the moment I only have a single source for most of the information I'm adding and it would be useful to have some additional verification. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 11:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gasheadsteve: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a regular contributor, with about 87,000 edits (including deleted). I write on a variety of subjects: I've had 10 articles, predominantly written by me, achieve good status and 3 have been promoted as featured articles – with a few in the pipeline. I often use research access to help others with their writing efforts here, as well as to check sources for verification. I also spend quite a bit of time checking claimed and suspected copyright violations, which requires access to a diversity of sources. I have actually needed access to this database a few times to verify content and had to turn to the fine folks at WP:RX for secondary access.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fuhghettaboutit: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Joseph2302 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Been an editor for just over a year, have 32,000 edits, 2 FL, 6 DYK (+ 4/5 pending). Looking to improve history of articles relating to Sussex (where I'm from), and London (where I live), with a focus on sports. Used BNA in British Library, but I'm only in London on weekends, and I'd like access to it 24/7- articles where I've used BNA include Canford Heath, Central Recreation Ground, Hastings and County Cricket Ground, Hove. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Joseph2302: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers,TLSuda (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ureinwohner (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Mainly active in the German Wikipedia, admin since 2005, over 72,000 edits. Tried a one month subscription on my own to see if it's really useful beyond my literature about British footballers and I think it's an amazing addition (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) I'm usually adding small facts to the English articles (around 1,8k edits) when I'm writing them for the German project. --Ureinwohner (talk) 22:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ureinwohner: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Tom29739 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like to use the British Newspaper Archive because I would like to edit a lot of British articles and need good sources to add to the history section of those articles. I like history, and I think that having access would help me add reliable information to those articles. I contribute regularly, and I'm in good standing on Wikipedia. Thanks, Tom29739 [talk] 22:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
    @Tom29739: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. MinorProphet (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Been editing for 6 years, sometimes newspapers are the only source of info on some topics; it would be very helpful to have better access in order to improve articles (mostly historical). Cheers. >MinorProphet (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @MinorProphet: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Tintin1107 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription has expired. Can you please renew it. Tintin 12:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tintin1107: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Harrias (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Ditto, subscription has expired, and this has been a brilliant resource for research, being particularly helpful for late-19th century cricketers. Harrias talk 13:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Harrias: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Nigej (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My years subscription ends on 16 December 2015. I have found it particularly useful in the area I am covering: golf and snooker, and would appreciate an extension to my subscription. Nigej (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nigej: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Richerman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have found my subscription very useful over the last year and used it for a number of articles - could you please renew it? Thanks Richerman (talk) 19:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Richerman: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Worm That Turned (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My subscription ran out a while ago, I've recently found myself with a bit more time, so would love to have access to this resource again. WormTT(talk) 09:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Worm That Turned: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda:, I had a look and my account hasn't yet been updated - I thought renewal only took a few days? WormTT(talk) 09:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Worm That Turned: It usually does only take a few days, however, we have not received any information on these requests. I'll try to follow up for the third time and see if I can find out what is going on. Thanks for your patience. Cheers, TLSuda (talk)
  46. czar (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Renewal. Used previously for British alternative schools, early 20th century. Haste the day when the digitize the Daily Telegraph. Thanks, czar 10:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC){{[reply]
    @Czar: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Jack1956 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My account has expired. Could it be renewed, please? Thanks. Jack1956 (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jack1956: Approved Your account should be updated shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:BNA/Approved&oldid=1140383601"