Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 43

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 → Archive 50

František Vyskočil

His CV IS WELL DOCUMENTED,(last time today). Please remove the warning from the title page of his record. regards,

Dr. F. Kinac, author of the FV record -90.180.229.91 (talk) 10:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

 Not done The article in question is not up for deletion, nor has it ever been deleted. It is, however, a c.v. and not an encyclopedia article. It does not use citations at any point, and I do not yet see the notability. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

File:In the darkness.ogg

The file was deleted as it was listed under non-free content criteria but without explanation. I wish to add the explanation. -78.86.186.215 (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

  • This file was deleted fairly recently. Do you have a rationale on hand? If so I'll restore the file and re-link it to the appropriate article. Protonk (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

FORWARD Project (EU Project)

Subjectivity of concerns that lead to deletion. -139.91.70.46 (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


The page was deleted in last April after the following expressed concern: 

 Original research, unreferenced article about another non-notable EU sponsored project.

I think that this concern is largely unjustified because:

  • There is no wikipedia policy I'm aware of against informational pages about EU sponsored projects.
  • In fact there is a whole category about EU funded projects, most of which are of comparable quality with the deleted page.
  • The reporting user is a US resident with no stated knowledge on ICT Security (the subject of FORWARD). Given this background, his assessement of the FORWARD Project as "another not-notable EU sponsored project" seems largely subjective, unfounded and US-centric. In fact the project (funded with ~1M Euros) was successful enough for the EU to fund a follow-up project [1].

Regarding the "Original research" concern, there are plans to update the article to bring it up to par with the wikipedia standards as we did in the past when similar concerns were expressed.

Thank you for your time.

A lot of anti-WP:AGF comments there. Two questions: who is "we", and what's your relationship to the project? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Pluto-RedlightSyndrome.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Redlight Syndrome. -Zundark (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Finish Ticket

The Finish Ticket page was deleted for failing to demonstrate the band's notability. However, in 2010 the band won the Not So Silent Night Local Band Competition which is a major music competition, and makes Finish Ticket the most prominent local band of the San Francisco area. Therefore the band meets two of the criteria for notability required of ensambles so their page should not have been deleted, let alone immediately deleted. -Bwallace722 (talk) 00:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

  •  Done I'm going to use "admin's discretion" and undelete this for 2 reasons. 1. The deleting admin did not make it clear in his deletion rationale if he was deleting it as an "expired prod" or as an A7. 2. The PRODing editor didn't think it was an A7 candidate and the article had 2 sources hidden at the bottom of a bunch of whitespace that appear to be "significant coverage". Therefore I think an AFD is needed to judge whether or not they are "reliable". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Chapter1learning.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Early Recordings (album series). -Zundark (talk) 15:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Broomstones Curling Club

New Information that should meet notability -GormtheDBA (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

A previous article about the BCC was deleted with only a small handful of comments, some of which noted that the article was verifiable, just perhaps not notable enough. The Broomstones Curling Club has been selected as the host site for one of the 2012 US National Championships, which directly enters to the world curling championships and has impact upon the Olympics, and as such meets the working guidelines for presumed notability being proposed by the Curling Wikiproject. Additionally, there are other citations available that should meet WP:NOTABILITY, and I intend to include them, but need the article in order to preserve the original, almost good enough, content. I am perfectly okay with the article being restored to my userspace pending the cleanup. Thank you GormtheDBA (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. In view of the low participation, the closing administrator at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broomstones Curling Club said that his close should be treated as a PROD, i.e. the article should be restored on request. Please add your new sources as soon as convenient. JohnCD (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

low dose naltrexone

Information has been removed and should be replaced. Pharmacology of 'naltrexone' belongs under 'naltrexone', not 'low dose naltrexone'. Science is first and foremost about observation. Scientists may 'observe' published clinical trial results but should also 'observe' actual patient outcomes reported by general practitioners and patients. Science is not supposed to be 'selective' about what it chooses to 'observe'. -220.237.76.147 (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

This page is only for requesting restoration of pages which have been deleted. What you have here is a content dispute: you should discuss it on the article talk page, and try to reach WP:Consensus with other editors. If you cannot reach consensus, use WP:Dispute resolution. See also WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you John. I entered the request here because a large proportion of content has recently been deleted and needs to be restored.

No worries. This is a confusing maze, but we do our best to help people navigate it. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Hangout Music Festival

I do not believe there was an reason for the article to be deleted in the first place, it had citations, and followed the same format as all other major music festival articles. As a major music festival, the Hangout Music Fest needed a wikipedia entry and I thought the starter one I put up was a sufficient jumping off point for future contributions. -Srt252 00:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Done I suggest adding good citations, or the article may be nominated for deletion via AfD. LadyofShalott 00:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
I have also notified the deleting admin of the restoration. LadyofShalott 00:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Pseudonym (Indian Band)

Pseudonym is band based in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The band has performed LIVE in various places and performs at Someplace Else, Kolkata on every Wednesdays from 11:30 PM onwards. The article is based on reliable, published sources; and, all majority and significant minority views.
This article also had references/citations before the deletion.
Citations/Reliable Sources: 

 Publishers of the work: Hindustan Times, The Telegraph, The Times of India.
 All the above are broadsheet daily newspaper in India.

The article also meets WP:MUSIC featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media.
With regards,
Iamgymman123 (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. I have userfied the page for you to User:Iamgymman123/Pseudonym (Indian Band) where you can work on it to add references. Then you should approach user Atama (talk), the admin who deleted it, to see if he will agree to restore it to the main space. Then, if you are not happy, you can go to WP:Deletion review. In my opinion, with your extra sources there is enough to avoid speedy deletion, but I do not think it would withstand a challenge at WP:Articles for deletion - check out WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Rob Cage

The article is information about a British entertainer, where information about him is well documented online. -Jedi Pharmacist (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

content added on wrongly submitted blank page, now corrected

wrong page was initially submitted (without content)by error click . It has been since corrected with appropriate content . -Jurnalist (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

This page is for undeletion of pages that are currently deleted. This article exists and so this project page has no applicability to it. The prior deletion for having no content has no affect on the page now. However, the reasons stated in the disputed prod tag, that the subject lacks notability, may arise again at an articles for deletion debate so it may yet be subject to deletion, but again, that is not applicable here. The article is not written in very comprehensible English but that can be fixed.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

File:David Allan Coe - Nothing Sacred.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Nothing Sacred (David Allan Coe album). -Zundark (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 13:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

ozormesis

revised article -Lambertore (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Ozormesis, or Ozo-hormesis, is the term proposed to describe the paradoxical effect induced by low doses of ozone. The word hormesis, from which it derives, refers to an adaptive phenomenon of the organism. Since the ozone molecule is a potent oxidizing agent, the adaptive response of the organism consists in an antioxidant response due to the modulation of the synthesis of some mitochondrial enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD) [1]. The phenomenon has wisely been anticipated 500 years ago by Paracelsus with the famous sentence « Omnia venenum sunt: nec sine veneno quicquam existit. Dosis sola facit, ut venenum non fit »[2]. The phenomenon hormesis has recently been described and also studied by the toxicologist Edward J. Calabrese [3]. The term Ozormesis has been proposed for the first time in 2008 and published in the Bulletin of the Medical Association of Ancona, Italy[4].

Not done and will not be done You yourself wrote, "We are trying to introduce a new definition, never used before, to name for the first time". Wikipedia is not a place to attempt to promote your neologism. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. Some work are in progress regarding the topic and I hope to come back to you and Wikipedia when strong evidences will be published on peer reviewed int journal. Thank you again and sorry for that.Lambertore (talk) 06:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

The_HAB_Theory

The author Allan_W._Eckert died today. That's how I discovered the deletion. Outrage is an understatement.

Seven of the author's books have been nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in literature. He received an Emmy Award.

The_HAB_Theory book was certainly controversial. It was written to be.

It is the only one of Mr. Eckert's books to have been deleted from Wikipedia - something I find exceedingly odd.

This book sold well, perhaps because it asked many difficult questions.

It is quite easy to understand why some troll might nominate this page for deletion, but to allow deletion is to my eye a massive error.

For value as a wikipdeia page, I suggest a glance at the Amazon.com page for the re-print and original paperback. There was also a hardcover edition, not currently listed, but I've seen these sell for $150-$300.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0595008208/ (72 5-star reviews, vs 15 4-1 star review)

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000GR73O8/ (Used 1977 paperback ask: $9.97) 

-rosebud (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
You completely misunderstand and your outrage is misplaced. It was not deleted because it is not a worthy topic or shouldn't or cannot have an article. There are millions of worthy topics for articles that have not been created. The act of creation is not sacrosanct (though some very wrongheaded users here feel otherwise). No, what happened here was that though a good article could be made on this subject this wasn't it. Instead, this was an unsourced book review with threadbare content and some unencyclopedic personal opinion material that has no place in an encyclopedia. It is often better for Wikipedia to have no article than a bad one. Because this was deleted via the prod process I will restore, and make some edits to improve the content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Zeeshan Jawed Shah

Hi I added my name in the wikipedia list and it got deleted, but now who ever searches my name the deletionpedia shows my name there, which is really embarrassing for me, because I am losing my jobs contact with that. please remove my name from deletionpedia as well -Venomx79 (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry to hear about your troubles but we are completely unaffiliated with deletionpedia and have no control over their content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

ok now its appearing on wikipedia also "I mean this thread, can we remove this thread too, I might get in trouble if some one find this too"

Jeff_Harris_(soldier)

reasoning -LimeyTart (talk) 00:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


As I was editing the article to include information from the following sources, some fool had added extraneous inflammatory (and false) information. Without those unnecessary additions, the article was factual.

See: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:z5LsJd_XKZ0J:www.kinston.com/news/kinston-74888-recalls-army.html+Jeff+%22Rock%22+Harris+refuses+to+display+his+medals+and+honors+in+his+Kinston+home.&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com

http://www.kinston.com/news/story-74947-ranger-contest.html


Thanks!

 Not done The very first revision on the article had unsourced, extremely negative content, i.e., before anyone fool added "extraneous inflammatory (and false) information". The next edit by an IP was obvious vandalism, which may be what you are referring to, but your original content, before the change, was properly deleted under section g10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, and will not be undeleted. By the way, why have you created a second account? Please see our policy on sockpuppetry.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


I have only one account. The first article/revision was not done by me. When I made my revision, adding information from the articles and removing the garbage about a "7 inch penis" - I was an unregistered user. When I submitted, I was taken to the page stating that the article had been deleted. I subsequently registered and came here to request that the deletion be reviewed.

The two edits by the same IP to the article were each vandalism. I can see every revision and see from each one what was added. The only possibility, if you actually added good content, was if those edits were oversighted, hiding them from my view (which is not likely here). It's also possible that you edited the article to improve it, but you previewed your edit rather than saving, or when you clicked save page it did not take (which does happen). In any event, there is not a single version of this article that is not a BLP violation—in fact, every version meets the definition of an attack page. If the subject is notable (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide here) then you can create it afresh. Undeletion is out of the question though.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


Given your classification of them as violations, I don't believe that I made either of the two edits that you are referring to, so my assumption is that my save did not take. Some of what I did see on the page when I went in to edit certainly fell under the guidelines that were given for the deletion. My edits simply recounted the publishing of the article and the claims made by Harris in the article. And removed the information I previously referred to as extraneous and inflammatory.

The IP that you are referring to - by "same" do you mean it is the same as mine or it is the same for the two edits?

I will follow your suggestion and look into the military history area. I think Harris might also have a place in the Military Impostor section of the Impostor page. This story seems to fit right in there. Regardless, thanks for your time and suggestion.

I mean that there are two revisions total by one IP address (which geolocates to Munich, Germany--I assume that is not you:-). The "penis" vandalism you saw was added in the first edit, and similar crap was added in the second edit. There were no other edits by logged out users, so your [attempted] edit is not recorded.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I'm most certainly not in Munich! I'm somewhere that could be classified as the polar opposite of Munich, I think. Thanks for the clarification and walking through this with me in a very helpful manner. I appreciate it.

File:Chicagosparta-opencupwinners-1938.jpg

source http://www.illinoissoccer.org/ -Ceezmad (talk) 02:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karel_Martens

He his a great inspiration to every designer I have ever met, teachers talk about his in class and I have referenced his work in some of projects for inspiration. The deletion of this page goes against the values of Wikipedia, pages should not be deleted because someones opinion believes they not notable, people should be allowed to have the right to view any material regardless of someones personal opinion, thank-you for your time -118.209.37.172 (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done While deleted by PROD the article was an unsourced BLP. However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Rachel Bright

reasoning -90.207.81.111 (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. References were added after the BLPprod, so it could have been removed. It would be useful to add more references if available, as I am not sure this shows notability to the standard required by WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Day Pitney LLP

would like to expand the article to be more comprehensive and in line with content guidelines -Tabajek (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

 Already done. The article was already userfied by Cirt and it's now located here. Please, before moving the page back to mainspace, ask for feedback at WP:FEEDBACK, so that your article will not be deleted again. Happy editing. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Fire ProWrestling S - 6Men Scramble Coverart.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Fire Pro Wrestling S: 6 Men Scramble. -Zundark (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_not_sad_today

This movement has saved so many people. The least you can do is let a Wikipedia page be about it. -71.12.205.125 (talk) 00:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC) "

  • Done I've restored it for now, but unless reliable, secondary sources are added to show notability, this article is not likely to stay very long at all. ("The least you can do..." is not how it works here.) LadyofShalott 00:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Escape Training Tower Pearl Harbor.jpg

Photo is from USNAVSUBASENLON archive, photo by Naval photographer, no other source for this picture is likely to exist, work of the United states government, public domain image -User:Pedant (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. I have reset the timer, which gives you a week to add appropriate license information - see Help:File page. If this is established as PD, consider moving it to Commons. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Not gonna work on a timer, I've been out of the navy for decades. This is already established as a public domain work taken by a US Naval Photographer, it's original was somewhere in the archives at the sub Base in Groton. It would be a nontrivial matter to provide more than this. Same goes with the picture of the escape training tower, which was also listed for deletion. I object to pictures with valid permissions being retroactively invalidated by new bureaucratic processes and deletionist editors. Either just reinstate the picture on my say-so, or contact USNAVSUBASENLON and ask them. User:Pedant (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Erin (Miguzi)

I searched for this forever just to find it has been deleted. There may be others like me. I was looking for a page about Cartoon Network's cancelled Miguzi segments, and there are NO MENTIONS in the Cartoon Network article. If you wanted to find the people interested in it, put a link there, as well as connect to broken links such as in Static Shock. -64.178.115.126 (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cartoon Network programing blocks, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --B (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Top of the Pops, Volume 18

This album was number 1 in the national LP charts in 1971. For that fact alone it is notable. It has latterly been reissued both on CD and iTunes. -86.177.93.204 (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

    • Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. you can just reverse the convert to a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Top of the Pops, Volume 20

This LP was number 1 on the UK national album charts in 1971. It has been re-issued lately on CD. It is notable by virtue of its chart success. -86.177.93.204 (talk) 12:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. you can just reverse the convert to a redirect. Click on the history link above, and click undo next to the latest revision by SilkTork, and supply your reasoning in the edit summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Qaiser Rafique Yasser

reasoning -Qryasser (talk) 04:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. January (talk) 11:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Afterfilm.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in After... (film). -Zundark (talk) 08:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg

Did not have the time to provide a 'fair use' rational. -Sperxios (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

This was the article's deletion log-line:

00:00, 29 June 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg" ‎ (Deleted because "F6: Non-free media file with no non-free use rationale". (TW))

User User:Sfan00_IMG: indeed notified me about the forthcoming speedy deletion due to missing fair-use rational, but i did not had the time to review it. Now that i have the time, i can add the rational. I also claim that it ishould not have been deleted according to WP:CSD criteria.

Fair-use rational
Non-free media rationale for Greek Civil War
Article

Greek Civil War

Purpose of use

The photo accurately depicts a defining moment of modern greek history, the "dekemvriana", exactly at the moment the greek and english troops starting shooting against the demonstation of ~300.000 Athenians, just 3 months after the Germans had retreated from the country, on 3 Decemeber 1944. This episode was the major cause of the Greek Civil War that followed, some 1 and half years later.

Replaceable?

Cannot replace this historical shot.

Page was unfit for *speedy* deletion

It is also unfortunate that this picture was speedy-deleted since it had already survived a deletion discussion. If i remember correctly(cannot access history), the deletion-discussion was on the history of that page(or its discussion page) due to licesing problems, and the controversy had been fixed. Therefore, according to the opening paragraphs of WP:CSD, it should not have been *speedy* deleted.

  • Done. I have restored the image and reset the timer. Please add your fair use rationale to the image description page and remove the template once you have done so. Please note that your rationale should include not just what the image depicts, but an explanation of how "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (see WP:NFCC#8). --B (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Petkim.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Petkim. -Zundark (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

ACR Carpets

informative -Ropez81 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


How can other businesses such as pimlico plumbers have a business page and we can't? Is it because Max Clifford is their PR?

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Articles about companies are included based on the notability of the topic - not based on the kind of work they do. A large plumbing company that is covered in the news media may be appropriate for inclusion, while a small family-owned company may not be. This is not a value judgment as to the quality of the work or any such thing - only a reflection of what appears to be notable based on coverage in reliable secondary sources. --B (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Tomori Berat.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in KS Tomori Berat. -Zundark (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done --B (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Gucci (Modern term)

  • Gucci (Modern Term) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. The use of the phrase "Gucci" is becoming more and more popular among the teenage crowd as each day goes by! I firmly stand my ground when i state that this page deserves to be a part of Wikipedia. It was deleted on accounts of Vandalism, but in my defense, I would never publish an article/ edit previous work for the defecation of this website. I personally owe too much to this website to ever desire to hurt it in any way. I was merely adding to its richness by creating this entry because as soon as someone hears this phrase for the first time, they are likely to "google" it, and I want our page to come up first. Thank you. -Thommanator (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site for things made up in school one day. --B (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
  • For more reasons why this is not the sort of thing Wikipedia is for, see WP:NAD: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a slang, jargon or usage guide", particularly the section WP:NEO. Try Urban Dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Three Star Club.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Three Star Club. -Zundark (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done. I have restored the smaller version of the image (per NFCC#3). --B (talk) 18:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Certified Information Systems Security Professional

The article is worth reading for any individual who is seeking a certification in computer security profile. It is common in wikipedia to provide knowledge about various certifications and organisations providing them. Who ever comments this as "this is just an advert for a certification" should concern about deleting the following topics also. 1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Certified_Engineer#Red_Hat_Certified_Engineer_.28RHCE.29 2.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCIE#Cisco_Certified_Internetwork_Expert_.28CCIE.29 -124.124.95.15 (talk) 09:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

3.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Technology_Infrastructure_Library.

  •  Not done The article in question is not deleted yet, it has been WP:PROD. At this point, it is simple of matter of you (or any other editor) fixing the concerns (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Premiere Devolopment Bank logox.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Premiere Development Bank. -Zundark (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Kyle Ward

Please check the deletion log. It appears that a user simply didn't like Kyle Ward's music and only because of that proposed a deletion of his wiki page. Many do not agree on that, and it's a invalid argument for deleting a page. I hereby request his wiki page to be brought back. -90.129.58.213 (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Quantech ATZ

academic investigation transference successful case -Ajzurdo (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Atama (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Nabil Ayad

Notability is now asserted very well please see below -Jarral 99 (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


Hi Athaenara

I just noticed that you have deleted the page on Dr. Nabil Ayad at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nabil_Ayad&action=edit&redlink=1 quite surprisingly for your concern that 'Notability is not asserted'. I find it hasty and reckless because Dr. Ayad is a notable and distinguished personality of worldwide recognition and repute.

If you had just googled his name you probably would not have proceeded to delete the page.

Dr. Ayad is the founder head of the Diplomatic Academy of London which is world's top school of diplomacy and the only one of its kind. DAL has taught and trained generations of diplomats for over three decades and Dr. Ayad is the founder leader of the school. He has worked with Sir Peter Marshall and written a number of books on the subject. A detailed description of his achievement and contributions is available on the website of Global Diplomacy Academy. Please follow the links below for references:

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/bio.htm

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/symposia.htm

http://www.genevagsg.com/2010/12/dr-nabil-ayad/

http://culture-multicultures.blogspot.com/2010/11/interview-with-mr-nabil-ayad.html

Currently, he is Director, London Academy of Diplomacy, University of East Anglia, London and Professor of Diplomatic Studies, Nyenrode Business University , The Netherlands: http://www.uea.ac.uk/london/lad .

I hope you can restore the page with appropriate changes/additions/citations. Once it's back on the site, I'd add further details. I'll be looking forward to your quick response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarral 99 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

That article was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} at 07:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC) by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) with the edit summary Propose deletion as insufficiently notable and the concern Notability not asserted, see WP:ACADEMIC. Per WP:PROD seven days passed during which time, if independent reliable sources existed per Wikipedia:Notability (academics) (there had been none since December 2009), other editors might have found and added them. That did not happen, so it was deleted a week later. You are free to consider Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Centauri Dawn. -Zundark (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Done --B (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Ji Chang-wook

Original author contacted me to ask for help after I expanded one of his other articles which is at AfD. This one also seems to have sufficient news sources in Korean to write a much better article: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Can you put it in my userspace so I can work on it until it clearly demonstrates notability? Thanks. -cab (call) 03:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Eh, never mind, he recreated it himself at Ji Chang-wook. If there's anything useful can someone undelete the history? Cheers, cab (call) 04:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
You must have looked at it for the split second it was there before I moved it to your userspace. --B (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:CaliforniaAliBaba/Ji Chang-wook. --B (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

File:WellsBelloc1.jpg and File:WellsBelloc2.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History". -Zundark (talk) 09:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History". -Zundark (talk) 09:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Note: I merged these two requests. My inclination is to not restore these images because I do not see how they meet WP:NFCC#8. Are these images essential to the user's understanding of the topic? They don't seem to be mentioned in the text of the article. --B (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I've never seen the images, and I don't know what the FURs say, so I'm not in much of a position to judge. If you don't think they should be restored, I'll just remove the links from the article. --Zundark (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Image 1 Image 2. The contents of the image description pages are in the collapse box:
Image description pages inside
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. 
{{di-orphaned fair use|date=12 March 2011}}
{{Non-free use rationale
 |Article           = Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History"
 |Description       = Caricature of [[H. G. Wells]].
 |Source            = Derived from a digital capture (photo/scan) of the internal illustration. Copyright held by the publisher or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless.
 |Portion           = Internal page illustration
 |Low resolution    = Yes
 |Purpose           = The image serves as the primary means of visual identification of the author (Mr. Wells). 
 |Replaceability    = There is no free equivalent of this image, so the image cannot be replaced by a free image.
 |Other information = The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book.  Originally printed in the [[New Statesman]].
}}
{{di-orphaned fair use|date=12 March 2011}}
{{Non-free use rationale
 |Article           = Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History"
 |Description       = Caricature of Hilaire Belloc
 |Source            = Derived from a digital capture (photo/scan) of the internal illustration. Copyright held by the publisher or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless.
 |Portion           = Internal page illustration
 |Low resolution    = Yes
 |Purpose           = The image serves as the primary means of visual identification of the subject (Mr. Belloc). 
 |Replaceability    = There is no free equivalent of this book cover, so the image cannot be replaced by a free image.
 |Other information = The use of this image will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book.  Originally published in the [[New Statesman]].
}}

--B (talk) 13:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree that they shouldn't be restored, and I've removed the links from the article. Thanks for handling these requests. --Zundark (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome. --B (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done --B (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

File:WWF The Music Volume 3.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in WWF The Music, Vol. 3. -Zundark (talk) 09:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Done --B (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Buckcherry next 2 you.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Next 2 You (Buckcherry song). -Zundark (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Done --B (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Scott Harrington (ice hockey)

Please restore the edit history of this recently re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Done --B (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nexus_%28film%29

was listed too soon, now Comcast release was Apr 2011, upcoming North America DVD/VOD Aug 9, 2011 -76.67.11.232 (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexus (film), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Wizardman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Anyway, the deleted article was all of 3 lines long, plus a listing a cast members. If you are sure that it is notable, and meets the film notability guideline, it may be easier simply to recreate it. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 20:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I went ahead and restored it, since the deletion reason no longer applies and the film is now out/about to be out. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Adryan Oliveira Tavares

Adryan Oliveira Tavares is a well know professional footballer who has played for the national football team of Brazil in the 2011 Under 17 FIFA World Cup , coming fourth place and winning the bronze shoe for the 3rd most goals in the competition . The original article was deleted on grounds of Adryan Oliveira Tavaeres not being a known footballer -Romanempire295 (talk) 03:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adryan Oliveira Tavares, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user BigDom (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 03:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Destroy All Humans box art for the PlayStation 2.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Destroy All Humans!. -Zundark (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:ScratchYourName.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Scratch Your Name. -Zundark (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:AcornArthur110desktopsmall.png

Should be used in History of the graphical user interface and History of RISC OS. -Trevj (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Apparently originally included with this edit.

 Done Restored & FuR's added - leaving it up to the requester to put in the articles as he deems appropriate. 02:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Now included in articles. --Trevj (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

William Douglas (Bill) King

required revisions regarding significance of subject to be made and references to be supplied -WmDKing (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:St. Joseph's College, Geelong Logo.svg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in St Joseph's College, Geelong. -Zundark (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Souryam.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Souryam. -Zundark (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Spotonised

it is not a name of a company. This name was invented by me to describe a brand new advertising trend of the 21 century that involves more than just becoming a member of any business network. I have only started to write this article and I am in the process of learning how to write the Wikipedia article properly. This term "Spotonised" has been of a great interest of many PR and media companies in the UK already and I would like to educate people about it by writing some basic formation what it means, what it does, etc. Please, can you reconsider the undulation of my only just started article and let me complete it. Kind regards, Zaneta Vaughan-Spruce -THEWITCHEZ (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Mobile17

Page was not maintained but there are multiple sources referencing it that could be included, including hard publications. Suggest a restore and update? -140.247.10.201 (talk) 00:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

ie. Mention in Popular Science magazine. http://books.google.com/books?id=m3ZUE6GJZekC&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=geek+blog+mobile17&source=bl&ots=CZMVzHVAWn&sig=Jg4E_-D_HDm9OdQDqI92AhrUcRk&hl=en&ei=4eAcTqHNNaL00gG-tLG4Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAg

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile17, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 02:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Chris Eskola

I'm not sure why this doesn't meet the standards of being "noteworthy" Chris Eskola is an active bassist who has worked with, most notably, Mike Keneally and Chris Opperman on the album Oppy Music, Vol. I: Purple, Crayon, and Brian Viglione on the album Face of the Sun. -Pivotbass (talk) 01:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Brett Ritchie

Uncontested PROD; I came looking to see if an article was written about this player, drafted by the Dallas Stars, but find it deleted and the deleting admin. referring me here when I objected within the last hour. Want to see the existing article and see if I can determine the concerns and address them, as I am quite familiar with Ritchie's OHL team: the Sarnia Sting. -CycloneGU (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Kirk M Kelly

The Reason I wish to have this page undeleted is that if you look here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2329292/ it shows that Kirk is in fact an actor for film and tv. -Kktalent (talk) 03:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done While I disagree with the deleting admin that this was an A7 candidate, it was an unsourced BLP. However, you or any other editor is free to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Request to userify

Could the following deleted page be placed in my userspace please?

Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Some of them that I looked at randomly were deleted per AFD. For what purpose do you want them restored? --B (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
They are all AFDs. I want to work on them to try to improve them. Mathewignash (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The concerns don't seem to be quality of the articles - they seem to be that minor characters are definitely not notable. Though another admin may feel differently, my inclination is that this should go to DRV - the consensus seems to be that these are not going to be notable regardless of the level of effort you put into them. --B (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
My plan was merge some of the less-notable characters down to their team pages, and move the plot summary to episode listings, but I wanted access to the orignals to help write. If it's to much work, I'm sorry. Whatever you can do is fine. It would just help me having to re-research the characters.Mathewignash (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This might contribute to the notability discussion. CycloneGU (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Listen, I wrote the majority of the content of those pages, and I don't have copies of my work. I request you make it available to me please. You can userify, or email it to me. Mathewignash (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Varuninds

Please restore my last page

The article is a basic information and achievement of the person and the intention is not for advertisement any how... I will make the requirement changes as per the guidelines and help from wikipedia.

Thank you -Varuninds (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done There's a whole whack of issues here. First, conflict of interest - you cannot write an article about your organization or people within your organization. Second, this business itself does not appear to meet notability requirements, and the person in charge of it certainly does not, and was therefore highly WP:PROMO. There's more...however, even though you wrote this on your userpage, it still must meet certain limits to remain. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hart_%28artist%29

Expired PROD, concern was: Non notable writer with no independent sources to prove notability. -74.113.216.69 (talk) 07:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

File:AcornComunicator.jpg

Source to be confirmed if/when restored. If source impossible to ascertain, image will be replaced with a new upload from one of the links below. Source can be requested from uploader User:TreveX. A free image will be difficult to obtain because this is now a rare piece of hardware. FUR difficult to compose without seeing image - this will be done. -Trevj (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Source is likely to be [2] or [3].

Not done. I'm sympathetic, but even if restored this will end up being deleted on NFCC grounds. This image is simply a picture of the computer and part of the cord sitting on what looks to be a dark brown faux wood grain table. I'd suggest contacting the owner of the first website you linked to and see if he's willing to release his pictures under an acceptable free license. Feel free to follow up on my talk page. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
  1. ^ HH Ajamieh et Al, Role of Protein Synthesis in the Protection Conferred by Ozone-Oxidative-Preconditioning in Hepatic Ischaemia/Reperfusion, Transplant International, 18, 604-612, 2005
  2. ^ Opera Omnia, op. cit., p. 254
  3. ^ Calabrese E.J., Baldwin L.A., 2000, Tales of two similar hypotheses: the rise and fall of chemical and radiation hormesis, Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 19(1), 85–97
  4. ^ http://www.ordinemedici.ancona.it/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=576&Itemid=87
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_43&oldid=1138664626"