Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Daddy Yankee

Assessment

@Brankestein: An article about a list on Wikipedia can only be assessed as a list-classed article. The only way you can get a higher assessment is by nominating this list for featured list. Please read the criteria before nominating if you intend to nominate this article for FL. Erick (talk) 02:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Importance

@Magiciandude: Hey, I was wondering if this list's importance could be promoted from low to at least mid. WikiProject Latin music states that subjects from low-importance articles (and I suppose lists too) are "not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study". Daddy Yankee was cited many times as one of the most relevant figures in reggaeton music, so he is actually notable or relevant within its field.

I think this should be a mid-importance list, because the project states that its subjects are "only notable within a particular field or topic and has achieved notability in a particular place or area" and "Examples include artists who have received honors in recognition of their work, such as a lifetime achievement award". Daddy Yankee has won at least two awards for his career (Billboard and People en Español Festival) and more recently he became the first urban act to receive a Puerto Rican Walk of Fame Star. I don't think he is "only notable within a particular field" but at the sime time maybe he doesn't fit in the high-importance rate ("essential to understanding Latin music", "well-known and influential in Latin music"). He would fit there for being "well-known internationally" or being well-known "even to those who may not be familiar with the genre" but I think a mid-importance rate should be the better option. What do you think? Brankestein (talk) 22:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of awards and nominations received by Daddy Yankee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131013095024/http://corporate.univision.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Premio-Lo-Nuestro-2013-List-of-Nominations-by-Category.pdf to http://corporate.univision.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Premio-Lo-Nuestro-2013-List-of-Nominations-by-Category.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212110728/http://corporate.univision.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Premio-Lo-Nuestro-2014-List-of-Nominations1.pdf to http://corporate.univision.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Premio-Lo-Nuestro-2014-List-of-Nominations1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)