User:Excirial/Dashboard/Content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

4 Normal
2.72 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 10:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC) edit

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 145
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 13

Purge the cache of this page

WP:AIV[edit]

Reports[edit]

Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]


CSD / PRODs[edit]

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 6
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 5
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 27 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently


Old discussions (open)


WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Mike Terrana[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Air on White (talk) 02:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 188.29.33.129 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

List of United States presidential firsts[edit]

Reason: Request one week semi protection due to excessive IP vandalism pbp 03:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Obando, Bulacan[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target; see page history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Patrick Shyu[edit]

Temporary semi-protection, reason: edit-warring by IPs, violates WP:3RR. orangkalideres - talk - contribs 03:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Issa Twaimz[edit]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism several IPs. Adakiko (talk) 04:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Gainesville High School (Florida)[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism and Usage of Multiple ip's by 2600:8807:C143:9F00:DDCF:80BA:C447:6B9D and 24.170.195.23. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Charles Leclerc[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Squeakachu (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator 49TL. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Pokémon (TV series)[edit]

Semi-protection for a longer period: Inappropriate expansion of plot summaries by IP after page got unprotected. M S Hassan (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Jaan Se Pyara Juni[edit]

Reason: To avoid vandalism. Any unauthorized user or newly created account user could remove the redirect to create the page. So, it is better to enhance its protection and only the extended confirmed users are allowed to make edits in it. Thanks.StayCalmOnTress (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

List of streets in Cebu[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hi, I made this page to serve as an informative guide to the people of Cebu City and Cebu Province in general. It took me a very long time to compile all of this and publish it here in Wikipedia (I am a Local Historian by the way). However, as I check this page from time to time, I found out that some users has disruptively edited the entries in this page by changing my original template and format as well as editing names of historical personalities into a Spanish-style format (First Name, Last Name and Maiden Name) rather than the current Filipino Name Format (First Name, Middle Name (Maiden Name) and Surname or Last Name). Also, some streets which are Spanish in nature were "hispanized" like one time, when Juan Luna Street was converted to "Calle Juan Luna". Also, some of the users were deleting middle (maiden) name without any reasons. I don't know if they are too historically attached to the article but they start editing the page like its they are the ones who created it. I just want my page to be protected. I'm tired of editing this page which was marred by their inputs (I am editing this page while requesting this, 5/26/24). I hope you can grant me that peace of mind with regards to this page. Thank You!. AdmiralProudmore (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Alstom Movia R151[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

National identity cards in the European Economic Area and Switzerland[edit]

Reason: Too many changes to the title of the article without discussing on talk page. This topic also involved the use of the meaning of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and of the European Free Trade Association within the article. Kroby36 (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

South African Social Security Agency[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent external link spam target. Pahunkat (talk) 10:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Craig Considine (academic)[edit]

Reason: Recurrent and high levels of IP vandalism by a user attempting to bias article towards a promotional tone. Based on multiple contextual clues, user may be the page's subject. Attempts to engage in good faith improvements of this article are being undermined by this repeated vandalism. Boredintheevening (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Twitter Files[edit]

Semi-protection: Seems to be an ongoing edit war with no discussion. GMGtalk 11:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Vanished user 125[edit]

Indefinite full protection: Talk page of vanished user. BangJan1999 12:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Hardik Pandya[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing the history with article is consistently edited by IP’s changing the template parameters, adding unsourced information. EntrepreneurPedia (talk) 12:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2024-05-22 12:30 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
0 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM/R / WP:PERM/A[edit]

Requests for permission - rollback

WP:RFPERM (rollback)

Rollback[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:BerryForPerpetuity[edit]

I'm applying for rollback rights in order to help with my current recent changes patrolling. With rollback rights, I will gain access to more advanced counter-vandalism tools like AntiVandal and Huggle. I have been patrolling for about a month and made plenty of AIV reports (all of which were successful). BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

User:DANGA14[edit]

I patrol a lot at RC, have made 216 edits, constantly warns users of vandalism, does not edit war. I'm not part of the CVU, but i revert vandalism quite a lot. DANGA14talk 12:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 77 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 12:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't edit too much on mainspace. DANGA14talk 13:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
@DANGA14 FYI, successful applicants for Rollback rights will usually have at least 200 edits in the mainspace. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 Not done per above. I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism a little over a week ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

User:HirowoWiki[edit]

I've been active at recent changes for more than 3 months to help revert vandalism and report AIV, which is successful. Rollback rights need access to a counter-vandalism tool. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 01:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

A few concerns:
  1. A couple of days ago, you were warned about misleading edits summaries wrt this edit. Please explain, in your own words, why this edit was inappropriate.
  2. I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy?
-Fastily 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
I forgot to leave a warning message. Also, I made a misleading edit summary and not a typo. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 21:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Moving forward, what will you do ensure that you are always leaving a notification? Right after your last reply, I noticed that you failed to notify an editor after making a this revert. What exactly do you mean by "made a misleading edit summary and not a typo"? Like I said, both the contents of the edit and edit summary are inappropriate. Can you explain why? -Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
I've undid the last edit; they should leave a warning message. I changed the template with uppercase letters like {{pp|small=yes}} → {{Pp|small=yes}} and {{featured article}} → {{Featured article}}. The template shouldn't be changed in this article. Thank you for the explanation. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 07:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Why are you being so evasive with your answers? I'm not asking you trick questions or attempting to embarrass you. Please re-read my reply above and answer the questions please. -Fastily 05:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
I will ensure to leave a warning message after reverting your edit. The misleading edit summary referred to providing incorrect information in the summary, which did not accurately reflect the changes made in the edit. This can be misleading to other editors who check the edit history. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 08:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Sneezless[edit]

I've been patrolling recent changes for almost a year now, and the rollback right would mean I could start using Huggle for that, as I've been meaning to do for a while now. Sneezless (talk) (contribs) 21:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips. I'm already using Redwarn for warnings, but did you notice any particular times when I didn't properly warn users? I've been using the ProblemWelcome and WelcomeIP templates instead fairly often, since most editors I'd otherwise use a warning template on are new editors. Sneezless (talk) (contribs) 13:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Sure, here's a few from the past month: 1, 2, 3 -Fastily 05:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Clearfrienda[edit]

I'm requesting the rollback right so I can use Huggle when I'm patrolling recent changes. I was granted the right on trial about a year ago but I never got around to requesting it again. Clearfrienda 💬 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. Given that your rollback trial ended almost a year ago, I'd like to see you spend time actively participating in RecentChanges patrol before granting you this right. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Air on White[edit]

I have been active on RCP over the past month. I would like rollback for the particular case where a vandal persistently vandalizes the same page. It takes time to load via Twinkle and is frustrating when my attempt to revert fails because the vandal or someone else has made more edits. I believe rollback will save me time and make my efforts against vandalism more effective. Air on White (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 05:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
I do not warn users in what I assume to be legitimate content disputes, as warning would be patronizing and unconducive to discussion. The user who added the name of one of Pat Morita's grandchildren appeared to be acting in good faith; I reverted not because he was vandalizing or disruptive, but because the person did not have his own Wikipedia article. The argument here is not about vandalism, NPOV or BLP, but simply a content dispute about what is proper to include in the infobox. Meanwhile, in the case of Matthew Heineman, that was the third edit by a user who added BLP violations who was hopping to a different IP for every edit. It is useless to warn such a user, who I had already warned twice on two different IPs, just as it is useless to further warn a user who has received a level 4 warning and is still vandalizing. My failure to warn the vandal on The Chris Moyles Show was a mistake on my part, possibly because I forgot after I restored the page to remove vandalism by multiple IPs. I hope this helps you understand my editing process. Air on White (talk) 06:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
If you take a look at my contributions, it will be beyond obvious that I am aware of Twinkle and am regularly using it to warn users. Air on White (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

User:RodRabelo7[edit]

Hello,

Roughly a month ago, I requested to be granted rollback rights. The administrator who responded, Fastily, asked me to patrol recent changes for a month before requesting the permission again. Having done so, I believe I am now ready to become a rollbacker. As mentioned in my previous request, I've been a rollbacker on Commons for quite some time now – over a year –, understanding how the tool works and the risks associated with it, and committing myself not to misuse it, under the risk of losing it temporarily or permanently, and even being blocked.

Having patrolled recent changes for this month, with over 700 reversions in the main domain, I'm now more confident than ever in distinguishing between obvious vandalism, non-constructive changes, and good-faith edits, for example. I always make sure to notify editors after reverting their edits, so that these newcomers are not "bitten" (e.g. 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 5a, 5b). Sometimes I even notify and guide them without reverting their edits; that's why I currently have a bit more warnings on user pages than reversions in the main domain.

I also have a constant presence in Administrator intervention against vandalism, with a considerably high success rate (that is, the ratio between blocked accounts and reports). Of the more than 20 accounts I reported there (ignoring the IPs), only one was not blocked, for reasons I now understand well, so these will not be repeated. I have even opened a checkuser request as a result of my anti-vandalism activities (although this request was deleted in favor of one created later, I don't know precisely why).

Therefore, I would like to finally become a rollbacker. As mentioned before, I would like to have access to semi-automatic tools, namely Huggle, which would greatly facilitate my anti-vandalism work, making it more efficient. I enjoy patrolling recent changes, and rollback rights would certainly make my life easier.

Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 09:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests for permission - account creator

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Excirial/Dashboard/Content&oldid=492529976"