User:Ocaasi/dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 184.16.206.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Level II. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wyatt James Bailey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Level I. This might be a good faith newbie mistake. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- 49.205.241.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Level II. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Page deleted. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- 190.66.254.120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1178 twice in the last 5 minutes (Harassment pattern (TNT), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Lxma404 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:8f8:1735:bcb6:f129:3248:6a0d:2ef1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 51.191.166.94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block evasion by User:Brettandelle. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2405:201:3D:2B:6D86:BCE7:E356:D452 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – WP:NOTHERE, including: 1 AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 14:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thumbsucker100 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Thestalin69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "stalin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Mark-theblogger (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Gokudera ElPsyCongroo.reading.mobile (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Iliketechnicalblogs (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Chrisnyxofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Branuso78 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- NoExecutivesFunctioning (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: noecksecutivesfunctioning" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- DarthAdolf (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Not a clear violation. I think I see where you are going with this, but unless you can show some evidence, it is a stretch to call it disruptive. You need more than this. -- Alexf(talk) 00:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. I would tend to agree with Alexf; while more uncommon since a certain historical figure had that name, Adolf is still a given name for people. I would suggest discussing your concerns with the editor first, then bringing it for discussion if your concerns are unresolved. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Rconsulting (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Also implies shared usage, paid editing. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 07:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. "R" could indicate a person who in "consulting" and is not necessarily the name of an organization. They may be a paid editor, but that is not a username issue. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Casino Crest2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Casino Crest2/sandbox. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: CTOPS. Borgenland (talk) 08:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please delete and protect the creation of this page. Protection has already been set at both Real Malabar FC and Real Malabar F.C.. Jonteemil (talk) 10:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: 2001:4C4D:1D83:4100:8C0E:C340:AC32:4DF5 keeps changing the colours on the timeline with out seeking consensus and against the norm of other pages Mewhen123 (talk) 10:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A non logged in user changes the colours on the timeline without consensus and against the norm of other pages Mewhen123 (talk) 10:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A non logged in user keeps changing the colours on the timeline without consensus and against the norm of other pages Mewhen123 (talk) 11:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – The move war continues after the protection expires. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anonymous editor has repeatedly removed dozens of films from the list in the article. It's not really clear what the reason is (the editor has described the sources as "vague" and "ambiguous"). Whether a particular film is an exponent of "New Hollywood" is open to challenge, but the correct approach would be to start a discussion on the talk page and state why you disagree with the film's inclusion, along with sources backing up your position (or alternatively an explanation as to why you don't think the sources used by the article are reliable. Some of the films removed (such as "Serpico", "Who's Afraid of Virgina Woolf" and "Last Tango in Paris") are so ingrained in the New Hollywood moement that it is hard to envisage a valid sourceable position that considers them otherwise. The editor should take the issue to the talk page and hopefully semi-protection would encourage them to do that. Betty Logan (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again asking for this page to receive pending changes protection until sometime in November. Persistent low-level vandalism regarding the entry list, which by that time should be finalised. 5225C (talk • contributions) 12:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP whitewashing and removing of well sourced information - trying to hide ties with Russia. Paid SPAs interested only in removing sourced not pleasant material only. 80.98.145.168 (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/04/owner-uk-national-lottery-operator-to-sever-gazprom-ties good sources like this which demonstrate the person's ties with Russia are being persistently removed with false accusations. 80.98.145.168 (talk) 13:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The subject has recently been removed from his group as a result of sexual abuse allegations, the article already has significant activity and I expect more users/IPs to chime in so I think protection would be worthwhile as facts are being straightened. Some vandalism too. Orangesclub (talk) 13:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Crisrod 9124 from Costa Rica. Binksternet (talk) 13:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs adding incorrect information (changing lead to "former cricketer" when he is still an active player). Joseph2302 (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of example bloat from IP range over the last week. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Hotspot for socks of WP:LTA/Andrew5. Numerous reverted non-constructive edits by socks over the past few days. Also, they've vowed "ultimate sockpippetry" (sic), so no reason to expect the block evasion to slow down. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: See above: constant socking by WP:LTA/Andrew5. On this specific page, this involves reinstating personal attacks. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Redirect from Unicode character yet again incorrectly retargeted even after explanation at IP's user talk (Special:Permalink/1242420448#Quotation mark, which IP has partially removed). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Page should redirect to Preston Arsement. Sahaib (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add the movie Stree 2 to the list, in the wikitable in the section List of highest-grossing Indian films#Highest-grossing films. The movie has earned a Box office Worldwide collection gross of est. ₹367.86 crore by August 21, 2024. As of 20 August 2024, the film grossed ₹317.83 crore in India and ₹50.03 crore internationally, for a total worldwide gross of ₹367.86 crore.[1][2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.128.53 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment – You can request specific edits on the article's talk page using this template. TheWikiToby (talk) 00:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)- @TheWikiToby: Actually, they can't. Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films is semi-protected. Favonian (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Stree 2 Box Office". Bollywood Hungama.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Stree 2#Box office
- Declined Procedurally; I have dropped this at the appropriate talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 7 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
| 25 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Fairly regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who appears to be familiar with the policies and guidelines surrounding notability and encyclopedic suitability. I don't believe it's a good use of NPP's time to be checking their creations. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Over many months has been creating appropriately concise articles of a consistent and appropriate format; I've reviewed several of them as part of NPP, and now think that the right is appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2012 and have created about 220 articles. Only three of those (that I recall) have ever had to be revised before they were accepted. Though many of my articles have not been rated particularly high on the assessment scale, I think that I am experienced & familiar enough with Wikipedia's policies that articles I create need not clog up the new pages feed. Best, JPRiley (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I have been an editor since 2020, but only really started ramping up my edits in February of this year. I have made 254+ pages (at least 4 of them are from redirects), 103 of which have been in the last 3 days. Another user (Ryan shell) suggested that I should apply. The only major issue that my articles have had in the past was me using AI, which I have acknowledged was wrong and promised not to do it again to an administrator, who worked with me on how to properly find info for articles without using AI. Most of my articles are stubs, and I feel like they can clog up the New Pages Feed a bit. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Experienced and frequent editor. Knowledgeable in article creation and assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Commons for over 10 years, especially on transportation-related topics. Since 2015, I have been serving as a Patroller on Turkish Wikipedia, which I believe has given me sufficient experience. Although I have some shortcomings, I believe I have a good understanding of the policies, which is why I would like to apply for this access level. Thanks for considering this request. bluetime93 💬 14:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I would like to request use to see if it will be beneficial in helping fix banner shells on various pages. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Username change from JalenFolf. JalenBarks (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I am good at reviewing (outside Wikipedia, as part of my work). Cltr (talk) 04:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
At the start of this year, I received an automated message inviting me to join New pages patrol, which I noticed again today, so here I am. I have written several new pages lately, and have nominated articles for deletion in the past, so I am aware of the procedures of AfD, PROD, and CSD. I also have experience with similar topics from my time as admin on the Dutch Wikipedia. I try to be friendly, in particular towards new users. Finally, I might not know every guideline and will probably make mistakes, but I'm always open to feedback and will try to improve. Thanks for considering this request. Dajasj (talk) 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission to participate in the New Pages Patrol backlog drive. I have considerable knowledge in the AfD, PROD, and CSD deletion processes, as I have deleted pages in all three of them and have been involved in many deletion discussions. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I participated in the May 2024 backlog drive, had fun and learned a lot. I had time-limited permissions last time, and would like to contribute again this time around. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm interested in participating in the September backlog drive! I have experience with deletion procedures and discussions, as well as with creating new pages. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help with the current New Pages Patrol backlog drive. I have learned through experience and reviewing the official policies about the relevant guidelines and systems; I have always acted, and will always act, in a civil and good-intentioned manner. Mason7512 (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I previously received patroller rights in November of last year ([2]) to help diminish the backlog that existed then, and has grown/still exists now. Much of the same I said last time still stands, while I have little experience in AfD (some with PROD and CSD), I have spent a lot of time at RfD and with RMs, and I do have some limited experience with page creation. I also am very familiar with WP:COPYVIO and other general content policies and guidelines. estar8806 (talk) ★ 21:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I am interested in doing the September backlog challenge (my break will be over by then). I am typically active in AfD (usually participating, but sometimes nominating for deletion) and added in five articles via AfC as well the past year. Conyo14 (talk) 04:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I had planned to gain more experience with AfC before applying for this right, but I would be interested in taking part in next month's backlog drive. I have some experience with AfD (a couple of nominations and about 40 !votes), and I have been using the AfC tool since June. Mgp28 (talk) 09:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I am familiar with Wikipedia policies and want to help with the backlogs. Although this is my first time, I have experience reviewing new articles in WP:Tambayan Philippines. I would like to contribute to reducing the backlog. Royiswariii (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Zendrago X (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) I am requesting permission to become a New Page Reviewer as I have considerable experience contributing to Wikipedia and possess a solid understanding of its guidelines and standards. I am aware of AfD (Articles for Deletion), PROD (Proposed Deletion), and CSD (Criteria for Speedy Deletion) processes. Additionally, I have also created and improved numerous pages, I am committed to maintaining high editorial standards and ensuring that new content meets Wikipedia's notability, verifiability, and neutrality criteria. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 11:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
From time to time, I make the occasional page move, these are pretty much always uncontroversial moves. After seeing a move of mine from 6 months ago reviewed just today, I have decided, in the interest of reducing the backlog of editors who have to review my pages, to ask for this permission. Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I want to help with the renaming of various LGBTQ child pages as a result follow-up to the main article LGBTQ now being LGBTQ as a result of the concluded Talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 14 August 2024 discussion that I initiated. Most of the child pages all have existing redirects that need to be page swapped and many are not just 1-iteration, so need to WP:ROUNDROBIN swapped, for which Page Mover permissions are required. I am aware of the policies around page moving and will respect the permissions as such. Raladic (talk) 16:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
General moves. Recently I've wanted to move some voting theory articles (e.g. participation criterion) to rephrase them in terms of their associated paradoxes (e.g. the no show paradox). I've typically found this makes them more intuitive to most people. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements.
I am always looking for new ways to contribute to Wikipedia, and I have an extensive understanding of vandalism (I have rollback privileges, and have been fighting vandalism through almost all of my time here). I also have the Page Reviewer rights. OnlyNanotalk 16:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I've been around for a couple years now, and have significant understanding of vandalism, npov, etc policies. NeoJade Talk/Contribs 20:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I would like to help you by checking pending edits, I know Wikipedia rules very well. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I affirm that I have read the related guideline, the related section on Wikipedia's Protection Policy, the tips for pending changes reviewers essay, the policies on vandalism, BLPs and such. I hope my editing track record shows that I am capable of reviewing edits. TheWikiToby (talk) 23:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I've been around for a couple years now, and believe rollback would significantly assist me in patrolling. I believe I pass all requirements and have sufficient experience with patrolling and dealing with vandalism. NeoJade Talk/Contribs 20:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Previously had rollbacker rights, back from a break. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hello, I would like to obtain rollback rights to fight against vandalism, spam and any other non-constructive modifications, I know very well how to differentiate between a beginner user who simply makes a mistake, and a person who makes bad modifications voluntarily. Also I know how to use the Twinkle tool to leave warnings of cancellation of modifications on the discussion page of the users concerned. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I actively patrol Recent Changes reverting vandalism and incorrect good faith edits using Twinkle. For every revert, I leave a notice to inform the editors why their edit is reverted. I would like to use a more advanced tool to make this easier. Ednabrenze (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
I believe that I'm a responsible editor with a lot of experience, and that I would make for a great template editor, especially in my areas of interest such as Eurovision, Geography and Vexillology — IмSтevan talk 13:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
|
