User talk:Abhishek shannu

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Abhishek shannu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jack Frost (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Abhishek shannu[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Abhishek shannu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jack Frost (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Mahabodhi temple is the holiest place in bodh religion government of Bihar is building a convention centre is there .here millions people around the global visit here every year these information will be helpful to them ) --Abhishek shannu (talk) 11:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Abhishek shannu, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Navlakha Palace have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ruins of Rajnagar Palace.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ruins of Rajnagar Palace.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Abhishek shannu[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Abhishek shannu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paper N Parcel[edit]

A tag has been placed on Paper N Parcel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Puzzledvegetable|💬|📧|📜 20:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Deep Ocean mission[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu,

Thanks for creating Deep Ocean mission! I edit here too, under the username Path slopu and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 15:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paper N Parcel[edit]

A tag has been placed on Paper N Parcel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hugsyrup (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

T[edit]

This shouldn't be delete .I have mentioned proper reference this not a promotion of personal company or anything Abhishek shannu (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Paper N Parcel has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition of promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at OYO Rooms. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Create a separate article for Ritesh Agarwal. Wikilink redirects to the OYO Rooms article. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ritesh Agarwal[edit]

Hi Abhishek, many thanks for the new article about Ritesh Agarwal. There actually have been a discussion about an article for this person recently and the consensus was not to retain the article. Pls see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritesh Agarwal. I have therefore redirected the article to OYO Rooms. I am also concerned about the promotional nature of this new article and the misrepresentation of the business model of OYO which goes contrary to the main article. If that has changed, this will need a holistic approach and consensus about the articles. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1mg[edit]

A tag has been placed on 1mg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Nahal^(T) 10:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improving Rajgir Zoo Safari[edit]

Hi. I worked a bit on your article Rajgir Zoo Safari. Please note that references should be used for inline citations (WP:IC). Check how I reworked reference 1 and rework all the others turning them into inline citations. Good luck with your edits! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Jagat Ram moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Dr.Jagat Ram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phanindra Sama for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phanindra Sama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phanindra Sama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.I have added some more references.That are from credible sources most of the are from reputed newspapers.please check it and remove this from deletion list Abhishek shannu (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rashmi Singh (author)[edit]

Hello Abhishek shannu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rashmi Singh (author) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Anup ranjan pandey[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu,

Thanks for creating Anup ranjan pandey! I edit here too, under the username Domdeparis and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Domdeparis}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris (talk) 16:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maulana Mazharul Hacque[edit]

A tag has been placed on Maulana Mazharul Hacque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://twocircles.net/2009nov20/maulana_mazharul_haque_forgotten_leader_bihar.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jagat Ram[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jagat Ram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/padma-shri-for-pgi-head/719313.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.This page about an Ophthalmologist.I have taken his personal information like education, achievements, awards From Tribuneindia.com which are not included in copyright.These information can be use for education purpose this is not violating any copyright.so I am kindly requesting you that please review and upload it and message me for further discussion Abhishek shannu (talk) 06:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tribuneindia.com carries a copyright notice. Moreover, even if it wouldn't, it is a violation to take someone's work (text) and publish it without attribution. You have been warned several times about copyright rules on Wikipedia and you still decided to ignore the advice. — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Maulana Mazharul Hacque[edit]

Hi. I've moved your article to draft because it comes nowhere near the required standard for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please read the guidelines and work on the article in draft space until you think it is ready, then submit it for review by more experienced editors. Deb (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Phanindra Sama.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Phanindra Sama.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Anup ranjan pandey.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Anup ranjan pandey.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anup ranjan pandey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vivek Bindra[edit]

The article Vivek Bindra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roundmaster (talk) 12:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dr.Vivek Bindra.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Dr.Vivek Bindra.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Your addition to Draft:Dr.Jagat Ram has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Competence - repeated copyright violations despite warnings, problems with article creation.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't full aware that the reference that I was using it was copyrighted.please forgive me and unblocked. it wouldn't happen again

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please bear in mind before requesting any unblock that you were blocked also for "problems with article creation". Your talk page is a litany of templates and warnings. Please read or read again about Wikipedia by following the links in the #Welcome! message; and then follow the instructions above if you want to re-request unblocking. Also please indicate whether WP:COI or WP:PAID apply to you. --kingboyk (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was not fully aware of the reference that. I was using it was copyright .That's why I was blocked.After that I red the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia.Now I am fully aware about the polices and guidelines of the Wikipedia. please unblock me I want to continue contribute usefully to Wikipedia. Abhishek shannu (talk) 04:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, you were also blocked for "problems with article creation". Additionally you've not answered my question about whether WP:COI or WP:PAID apply to you.

If you still wish to make a new request for an unblock, please use the template again - {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} - but you're going to need to address the above issues and make a stronger case next time. -- [please ping me if you need a reply] kingboyk (talk) 05:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The word "Copyright" occurs on this page 56 times combined in at least half a dozen warnings and notices left to you, all of which encouraged you to read Copyright policies of Wikipedia. You have not complied, you keep posting copyrighted text, thus potentially putting Wikipedia in legal trouble and wasting other editors' time on going through and reverting your edits. You have been warned several times and as you have refused to learn, so time has come to put a stop to your editing. In your unblock request you will need to try hard to convince admins that you have learned how Wikipedia operates. I am not sure it is doable before 6 months - see WP:STANDARDOFFER. — kashmīrī ^TALK 06:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't full aware of the reference that I was using it was copyright.That's why I was blocked.After that I red the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia.Now I am fully aware of the polices and guidelines of the Wikipedia.i am neither WP:COl nor WP:PAID.Writing is my hubby whenever I have free time that I try to contribute to Wikipedia.I have created many new pages.I have nothing to do with them for example I created pages about startup they were deleted and reason was they were promotional .But similar pages already exist on Wikipedia. Please unblock me I want to continue contribute usefully to Wikipedia. If you won't unblock me.I don't have any problem but you should also delete pages that I have created

Decline reason:

Your claim "But similar pages already exist on Wikipedia" is offensive in how inappropriate it is. WP:OTHERSTUFF applies and you will need to come up with a far, far, far more compelling reason there. As to copyright... In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And why did you ignore the clear warning by User: Diannaa on June 24th? Doug Weller talk 12:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not fully aware of the reference that I was using it was copyright That's why I was blocked. After that I red the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia. Now I am fully aware about the polices and guidelines of the Wikipedia.I am neither WP:COI nor WP:PAID. Writing is my hubby.I have created many new pages I have nothing to do them .like I created pages about very successful startup they were deleted and I was accused of promoting them but similar pages already exist on Wikipedia since many years. I could not understand why this was happening. Please unblock me I want to continue contribute usefully to Wikipedia@Kingboyk:

Decline reason:

You have been asked specific questions that need to be answered. It is not enough to state that you are aware of policies, you must demonstrate your awareness by answering the questions posed by Yamla above., writing answers in your own words. If you do not wish to or cannot do that, please say so, but it's going to be hard to consider unblocking you if you don't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abhishek shannu (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you to answer some specific questions about copyright. If you are unwilling to answer them, please state so explicitly. --Yamla (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abhishek shannu Thanks for your answer abt COI/PAID, which is noted. You need to answer Yamla's questions. --kingboyk (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your understanding[edit]

Hi Abhishek, As you can see, other editors keep asking you stuff and telling you stuff, but you still seem entirely unable to comprehend even a simple question or follow a simple advice. See, Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and communication between editors is essential. If you are incapable of communicating effectively even in basic matters, maybe you will try to gain this competence elsewhere and then come back to edit Wikipedia in a couple of months?

When you repeatedly copy and paste unblock requests without heeding the responses you receive, it is only a waste of everyone's time. If you will continue to do so, you will get yourself blocked even from posting on this page. — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Answers[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. Copyright is the legal right of the owner of intellectual property. 2. Wikipedia licenced its editor to recreate,redistribute and reuse its text. 3. Copyrighted contents are not allow on Wikipedia because it harm the Wikipedia resdistributability and create legal issues for Wikipedia. 4. Copyrighted content can be use on Wikipedia by using brief quotation or by donating materials to Wikipedia. 5. I will not use any material which are not in public domain and if I will use them then I will use brief quotation. @Yamla:

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. This sounds good, but see below. Huon (talk) 10:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abhishek shannu (talk) 08:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Answer[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ignore the warning of Diannaa on 24 June because I used source material which was in public domain and I felt like it was a false allegation and please Check that page still exist on Wikipedia @Doug wellar:

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. This one unfortunately confirms that you cannot be unblocked. Diannaa removed text based on two sources. Neither of them was in the public domain, despite your explicit claim in this unblock request. Since you state above that you intend to continue adding content "in the public domain" but apparently are unable to recognize what is and what isn't public domain, unblocking you would be almost guaranteed to lead to further copyright issues. Huon (talk) 10:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Abhishek shannu (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Answer[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah I got many time notices. I felt that some of them were false allegation and some of them were edited by other editor those pages are still exist on Wikipedia. So I ignore the notices @Kashmiri:

Decline reason:

See above. Also, I'm not impressed by this stance of "ignoring notices that you feel are false". If you don't even ask for clarification and explain to the other editor why you think what you did is correct but merely ignore such notices, you are making sure that you cannot learn from your mistakes even if they are pointed out to you. Huon (talk) 10:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Abhishek shannu (talk) 10:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Answer[edit]

It was my mistake I should take that seriously . I accepted that it was my mistake now I am aware of the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia. So unblock me I want to continue contribute usefully to Wikipedia @Huon: Abhishek shannu (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Answer[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhishek shannu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah Diannaa removed text based on two sources.so I felt that it is a normal process anyone can edit any page on Wikipedia.if I used again copyright material then anyone will again remove from my page.That's why I ignore those notices.At that time I was a new editor on Wikipedia.I was not fully aware of the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia and I keep doing something again and again.It was my mistake I am accepting it.Now I am fully aware of the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia.it would not happen in future again.So unblock me I want to continue contribute usefully to Wikipedia. @Huon:

Decline reason:

It is far from clear from your responses to questions and your unblock requests that you really do understand the issues involved: it seems at least equally plausible that you are just parroting the answers you think are wanted, without understanding. As has already been explained to you, simply saying "Now I am fully aware of the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia" without indicating what you now understand that you didn't before is not enough. Far more often than not editors who say general things of that kind when asking to be unblocked, rather than explaining the specific points that they now understand, turn out actually not to understand the issues at all, so that unblocking simply leads to further problems and then another block. However, even if we ignore that and assume that you really do understand the issues, I'm afraid almost every post you make confirms that you very simply do not have the competence in English to contribute. Articles you have created are full of garbled attempts to write English sentences that simply aren't English sentences, and your posts to this page confirm the same problem. You may like to contribute to Wikipedia in a language over which you have more command. If so hi::सदस्य वार्ता:Abhishek shannu may possibly be a good place to start; if not you may like to look at meta::List of Wikipedias. You have now made seven unblock requests without making any progress, and there is no conceivable chance that you will be unblocked, so posting more unblock requests will simply waste both your time and that of the administrators who review the requests. To prevent such waste of your time and ours I shall now remove talk page access. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abhishek shannu (talk) 02:20, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anup ranjan pandey.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Anup ranjan pandey.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anup Ranjan Pandey moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Anup Ranjan Pandey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

This user has engaged in block evasion in October, 2019 as Shannu Prashar. They have continued to demonstrate a profound lack of competence in their incoherent edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anup Ranjan Pandey concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anup Ranjan Pandey, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dr.Jagat Ram concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dr.Jagat Ram, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr.Jagat Ram[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dr.Jagat Ram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anup Ranjan Pandey[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anup Ranjan Pandey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Budha samyak darshan meseum and Memorial Stupa[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Budha samyak darshan meseum and Memorial Stupa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 13:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Budha samyak darshan meseum and Memorial Stupa[edit]

Hello, Abhishek shannu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Budha samyak darshan meseum and Memorial Stupa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]