User talk:Alhitmi123

Welcome!

Hello, Alhitmi123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 16:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Alhitmi123, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Al Bin Ali have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Abu Tahir al-Jannabi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that Abu Tahr was Persian, he was born in Bahrain, he spoke Arabic all his life and didn’t speak Farsi. In fact he even ranked Persians as a second class in Qarmatia. Even the city their family name is named after which is Jannaba is southern Persia was mainly Arab ethnically. Alhitmi123 (talk) 20:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The two WP:RS that you removed says otherwise. Your claims are also unsourced. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you are correct, It didn’t make sense at first an original arab would do a genocide against defenseless civilians, his honor wouldn’t allow it. Thanks for clarifying 🙏. Alhitmi123 (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More unsourced claims. Please read WP:RS when you have time, thanks. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why it says WP:RS, do you have the name of the book or the full source? Thanks Alhitmi123 (talk) 22:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why it says WP:RS

This is why you should read WP:RS.

do you have the name of the book or the full source?

This shows you have not even bothered to check the citations. You just merely removed them because you disagreed with them. I am outta here. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked them and they don’t state that they were of a Persian origin, infact iranicaonline.org the website you cited clearly states in the first paragraph that his origin is uncertain. It seems that you want him to be Persian so hard for some reason or the other. Alhitmi123 (talk) 23:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"A native of Jannābā on the coast of Fārs and of Persian origin, whether he himself claimed royal Persian descent or the claim was put forward later on his behalf is uncertain." - Iranica The royal origin is uncertain, not the Persian origin itself.

Not to mention you are being hypocritical, you removed "Persian" because it was "unsourced", yet you added the unsourced "Arab". Attack me or remove sourced information again and you will be reported. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report me if you like, your source is not peer-reviewed, if you are a person of knowledge you would care about learning and not pushing an agenda. The source you mentioned clearly says that his origin is uncertain and the source is not peer-reviewed and doesn’t have any citation of any historian claiming he was of a Persian origin. Jannaba is home to many ethnicities including Persian. There is no evidence they spoke Persian nor been to Persia nor said they were. Alhitmi123 (talk) 01:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 03:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand, he is quoting the source wrong. And the source is not peer-reviewed. His source says something different than what it’s written. The source says uncertain! Alhitmi123 (talk) 04:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]