Jump to content

User talk:Amaury/2015/March

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2015 Archive Index: March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

Yeah thanks for catching the over-simplified somewhat aggressive edit on Deus. I did that because on a very simple level my original edit read as such and was tacked on to the end of the first paragraph.

"It continues this relationship explicitly with the words for day in English, Spanish, Italian, and French. The feminine in Spanish being dia and the masculine Dios repeats the relationship. In French, diurnal, the experience of the day, is also related and becomes jour, which is in turn the root of the word journey. In Italian, giorno is also related to diurnal and phonetically to Dio. Without a masculine or feminine concept in English we are left with the gender neutral day. The metaphor of an existential observational truth gains traction in the naming of Lucifer, Shining One, related to lucent, as the contrast of the light of a fire and the light of the Sun." maybe some edits could be *The feminine in Spanish is Dia while the masculine is Dios. Maybe Day could be capitalized all the way through as a nod to the idea of the proper name of God? Because basically the nod to the Latin languages in the first paragraph is incomplete and disconnected in my estimation. I think it all falls short of a true etymology and comes nowhere near common usage.

Maybe that can be tightened up a bit? but it certainly isn't inaccurate. and it was removed. Maybe I should add, "In the scripture Lucifer is a false light that burns man, while Jesus/God is the true light that gives us life. And that English, as a whole, is completely indebted to these concepts as they inform our current use of Day"

So I went back to the page and went supernova on it, because that connection is very deep and useful. One day at a time brother. thanks for noticing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierremariejeanahlstrom (talkcontribs) 20:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

@Pierremariejeanahlstrom: If you have any issues with the article, please bring it up on the article's talk page so you and others can discuss your concerns. - Amaury (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm a bit confused as to why you're removing messages left on my talk page? Sometimes before I see them? Azealia911 (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

@Azealia911: Apologies. They looked like vandalism to me. :) - Amaury (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
No need for apologies, although I am dealing with a pretty disruptive user, can you help me in reporting them? I haven't the faintest idea how to do so, they keep changing the sales information for Pink Friday, Nicki Minaj's debut album, on her [discography page]. [[1]] they have repeated this action numerous times against numerous editors reverts, and I have no idea how to stop them. Any help would be appreciated :) Azealia911 (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
@Azealia911: You can file a report by following the instructions at WP:AIAV; if that doesn't work, file a report by following the instructions at WP:ANI. Hope this helps. - Amaury (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Greetings, Amaury. Wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism to Now You See Me. I was just about to do the same thing. Typhoon966 (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Userspace protection

There's no doubt that the IP user 108 with different numbers is obviously the same vandal who's been causing nothing but trouble to my userpage and my talkpage, so I ask if you can lock them for protection (for only registered users and admins can edit). There's no doubt that he'll continue to evade the ban by changing his IP address constantly and create further problems with constant vandalism. Thanks. Jon the VGN3rd (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jon the VGN3rd: I'm not an admin, but I can request a page protection for ya. :) - Amaury (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Please do so. I can't constantly revert edits from my userpage as long as he's still around and waiting to cause further vandalism. Jon the VGN3rd (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
@Jon the VGN3rd: Done! - Amaury (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

I feel that I posted something to clarify what pay it forward ment. I understand that I have previously made some distruptive comments but I believe that my recent edit was necessary. Thank you for your time. User5457 (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

@User5457: I have reverted my revert on the Pay It Forward page and retracted my warning for that. The other revert and warning I feel is accurate, however. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Haven

I was wondering why, there was an part 2 for Haven season 5, because it is just one season. And i am new on wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.185.138.108 (talkcontribs)

@130.185.138.108: If you'd like that added, please provide a reliable source per the message on your talk page. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hey there can you please fix my change on the UK christmas Number 1 as I don't know how to fix it properly, The changes I have made are about spice girls and there songs as they where never Xmas number 1 I have put the link to verify what I am saying here this shows you that they were never and as they are the regulators of the charts, I am sure you can see that they are right in this case. I don't know how to edit that well so would be really appreciated if you could do it for me. I have put the same message on another users talk message. I hope you can help me make these changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.36.88 (talk) 16:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

@92.29.36.88: It certainly needs to be formatted better (that's why I misread the edit), but I don't think your intentions were ill. I have reverted my edit and retracted my message on your talk page. I'll let a more experienced editor in this department answer your question, though. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the page-blanking anons. I was lurking in the Recent Changes, and every time I caught a page blank or a vandal, you made the change just before I could. Thanks! Keep it up! :) NekoKatsun (talk) 17:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

So your subjective view that it's not helpful authorizes you to delete material from Wiki. Are you sure you are completely dispassionately objective in this matter? 204.38.4.80 (talk) 00:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Shandell Green

Hi this is new to me..and I don't think I am high tech enough to enter the discography I need to add. lol please helpMsToussaint (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Check out the your first article page. It should help you in creating a successful first article. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 07:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The edit I made was to add Bill Hicks to the list of notable chain smokers. I actually got the info from his Wikipedia page. Can I use that as a source? Dfdemt (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure you can't use Wikipedia as a source (Apparition11?). Do check out WP:CITE per the message on your talk page as well as WP:RELIABLE and WP:VERIFY, however. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. However, if the content in his Wikipedia article is sourced as it should be, you can use those same sources! Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 10:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I see you also reverted edits Special:Contributions/41.190.2.39 made, with a warning against vandalism. Clearly spam, and clearly not encyclopedic, but their choice of spam targets is interesting. The first article seemingly has nothing to do with the product being flogged, while the second one does. Someone selling dogy materials targeted at the Nigerian Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board might well be advised to spam it. But Doorjamb? Seems more like a bot's error than a human's.--Robin Thayler (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I only reverted them on Join Admissions and Matriculation Board, so I had a look, and I can definitely see what you mean. I'm wondering if we should report them for the potential of being a bot. - Amaury (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

User Adamjr2

See also the contribs. I would have assumed vandalism, but it's unclear, and I have to go now. —George8211 / T 21:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I can't access the talk page on mobile. Could you post my message on my behalf? Thanks Can someone please change then title to 2014-2015 Ferguson unrest? The sniper ambush has opened up a new chapter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowHawk555 (talkcontribs)

This is Knudknud

Fine, if this is the only way to connect, let it be. I don't believe I deleted the rapid delete notice, this must have happened as a result of a process. Second, I'd like an explanation what on earth is wrong with my wikipedia lemma, as it is public and neutral information about a person with significance. I will not accept bullshit reasons that the man is a nut because he obviously isn't, despite that he has some weird opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knudknud (talkcontribs) 23:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

If you'd like to have a discussion, please do so in a civil manner. Your uncivil behavior is unnecessary and unappreciated. - Amaury (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Will you explain to me why they were reverted? (Thank you!) 108.47.207.75 (talk) 06:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your uncivil behavior and repeated personal attacks toward other users. - Amaury (talk) 06:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
N-no, just that some little vandal (I won't reveal who did it) kept on reverting my edits on Adult animation. He (er, she) doesn't give a crap regarding cartoons. 108.47.207.75 (talk) 06:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Your behavior is still uncalled for. If you have an issue with someone, rude and uncivil comments won't get you far. Raise your concerns on the talk page of the article or user in a civil manner. Thanks. - Amaury (talk) 06:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm currently dealing with User:Bryce Carmony. They've breached 3RR on their talk page (I think), been harassing and making personal attacks, and I am tired and can't deal with it anymore. At minimum, could you look at his talk page and history? Thanks, Origamite 03:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@Origamite: You can file a report and discuss it at WP:ANEW. Hope this helps. - Amaury (talk) 03:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Armenian bone marrow donor registry

I am new to Wikipedia. I am not sure I am writing in the right place. I deleted the content of the Armenian bone marrow donor registry because there were several articles linking to the Armenian Bone Marrow Donor Registry instead. I did not know the page names were cap-sensative and I did not know how to change the name of the page to reflect that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KristinaForbes (talkcontribs) 03:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@KristinaForbes: I have no knowledge on this particular subject. I only reverted you for the unexplained page blanking. If you post your questions on the article's talk page, though, I'm sure someone will be more than happy to help! Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 03:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. Origamite 03:57, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I've also retracted my warning. I didn't realize you were the creator of the article, KF. Sorry about that. - Amaury (talk) 04:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. I have followed the instructions. Yes, I created the pages in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KristinaForbes (talkcontribs) 04:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Trapped In Static

Hey there I was creating an archive on the Trapped In Static was about to add the {{ talk archive }} tag in the contect of the page but you removed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.38.176.90 (talk) 05:58, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@100.38.176.90: I misread your edit. I've undone myself now. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 06:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Question, can I delete the contents of that talk page instead of archiving them? The part that says "There should be...." up to the answer from "Rhododendrites"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.38.176.90 (talk) 06:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure, actually. I would ask another user or an admin to clarify. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 06:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.38.176.90 (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Amaury, I checked the external link guideline page and my link have nothing to violate your guideline with, My links proved information from experts in the field of mental health "Therapists, Doctors and coaches". It will be so kind of you if you reconsider posting my link again. Thanks so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhmedHassantoday (talkcontribs) 10:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Dearest Amaury, thanks a lot for your help! I want to open this new page but I'm not able to take-off the redirect, sorry. How can I do? Are you able to help me? Please... Rei Momo (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Apparition11 may be able to answer this, so I've tagged him. (For reference, Apparition, see this.) - Amaury (talk) 23:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand: so I can't open the page as Vața de Sus only and I must write Vața de Sus (Romania)? Why? Rei Momo (talk) 23:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
@Rei Momo: You should be able to just edit Vața de Sus. This link will bypass the redirect. It doesn't appear to be protected or anything. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 00:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm very sorry to say that I have made a big mistake, I asked my students to do some contribution to robotics fields of the Wikipedia, and finally they have made many wrong changes to that page. Is it possible to simply revert to revision 650183430 edit by 24.73.169.18? Sorry about that again. I have also ask the write some sentences in User_talk:McGeddon#sorry_about_the_change_in_robotics_page to seek help. Thanks. Ollydbg (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Done! - Amaury (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refer to a dictionary. When used in a passive form, the verb "to consult" means that the subject is giving counsel/advice to the agent following "by". Contrast this with "to counsel", which refers to the same practice but for inverted roles. 93.51.172.34 (talk) 23:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Light bulb (disambiguation)

With regard to your message: I did not create the page or remove the speedy tag, but I did change the reason for the tag. You are welcome to revert it. 69.195.52.97 (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I do not dispute that it needs to be deleted. 69.195.52.97 (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

You recently reverted some careful and thoughtful changes that I made to DCV and Wikibullys. Please read the articles (the Wikibully section about Flippant edits may apply some of your recent efforts on Wikipedia) I suspect that you will find the Demand Controlled Ventilation article much clearer than the previous article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IsoFocus (talkcontribs) 00:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Cubish

Why do I have to be blocked for vandalizing a page, even if it's my page? It says if I don't edit my page, it'll delete it. I don't understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loser3572003 (talkcontribs) 05:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Explained WP:OWN, CITE, and (roughly) GNG. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Whats ur problem. Have u read the articles Infibeam and Buildabazaar fully? Buildabaaar is a dvision of Infibeam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.83.18.179 (talk) 08:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your reversions of my edits

Hi Amaury, I edited pages to share information among community about relevant link, I think link is relevant for any digital currency community/forum/blog etc, for your reference [2] (it's a marketplace for creative, talented and above all crypto lovers, who are willing to work for bitcoin.). We all know mining isn't profitable anymore and not everybody can afford costly miners. Website also share content and news about crypto-currency world at [3]. I think it would appropriate link among community. It is not violation of any Terms of Use. Please consider checking it out once before taking any decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pharoah237 (talkcontribs) 09:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

I made those additions, scant as they were, because they were in reference to the subject and were missing from it. Please put them back. In fact there is a lot missing from that particular page and it could do with a lot more of the myths from around the world where two women fall in love. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.168.206.237 (talk) 10:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on User talk:North Shoreman

Looks like I really stirred up an "excitable" IP. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 00:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome! - Amaury (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

I Was correcting mis information on the page that you undid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Destructor rph (talkcontribs) 01:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Amaury, if you are not a robot, you could tell that Barek (robot?) that on the same page he/it has a hidden external link that looks like this: AF Audrey Flack Website like real organic spam. Did he/it miss that? Also, there was no need to revert my edit. He/it could have just removed the external link. I have removed my very open external link, although it was educational or fact-proofing, very obviously not spam. The interface here is G-dAweful. One could hardly find where to reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sto500 (talkcontribs) 03:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Actually, this looks like I still can not find a reply form. Help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sto500 (talkcontribs) 03:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay. Looks better now. So, anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sto500 (talkcontribs) 03:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Fixed formatting, will explain the bot bit. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Just four lines up there is this AF Audrey Flack Website if it's a spam robot, it should have caught that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sto500 (talkcontribs) 03:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Will attempt further explanation. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Im trying to delete all content including text and images on this account in order to shut it down. Please assist if theres a mistake. Imransiddiqui (talk) 20:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, i am new to Wikipedia but the reason why i got an account is because there was an article which only about seven people knew about before it got banned, and the article was about my friends who overheard a secret meeting about a secret society which so happens to go by the name of paradox. scene this website was banned i do not have any proof of this unless you believe me. this is modern history being formed. part of the website i mannaged to copy and it was a speech that one of the members said. the speech was: "We are a group of people who believe that there is more to life that what it seems. We are individuals who try to become better people at anything we do. Why do we do it? We do it because we can. The human race can accomplish incredible things. Ever since the first wars, the human race started to separate itself. We believe that the human race can be reunited again. That the world can become a place were the human race is in peace. We work on advancing technology, science, math, politics, music, and anything possible to the one challenge that good people haven’t been able to accomplish, yet. World peace. There is more depth to everything around us. Water, fire, light, music, and everything that exists. Every single one of these things can become better. Our work can be destroyed by the greediness that lies within us all. We need to fight our self’s to do the right thing and not fight others. What is the point of war? We all know that war is wrong, yet we constantly do it. We are the product of about four and a half billion years of evolution, it’s about time we start acting like it." this is new history but i have no proof except for my word, if you trust me well then i hope that you will help me spread word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinkingcenter (talkcontribs) 17:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

A core policy is verifiability, so no, we can't take you on your word. If you find a reliable source mentioning them, we can include them. Origamite 17:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

King Tatie

Hello Amaury. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of King Tatie, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's plenty of articles listed that indicate importance. Take to AfD if required, though I think it'll fail. . Thank you. GedUK  13:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ged UK: You got the wrong guy. :) This user is the one who added the speedy deletion tag. I only reverted the author of the article for removing the speedy deletion template. Best regards. - Amaury (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Ahh, thanks. The script does it automatically, it doesn't cope with people putting the template back on. GedUK  13:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Another user keeps attempting to destroy this article by erasing most of it. The article is not contentious and has been developed over many years by many editors. The article may need better references, but adding them is impossible if someone keeps erasing the entire thing. Please review the history of the article. 83.136.123.72 (talk) 20:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Instead of edit-warring and falsely accusing others of vandalism, please take any issues you have with the article to the article's talk page and reach a consensus. - Amaury (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
So anyone can erase the bulk of an article, and if someone else tries to undo the damage that is edit warring? This makes no sense. The other user didn't post anything on the talk page, just erased about 75% of the entire article for no obvious reason. I have not "introduced" anything new, just tried to restore the article to its previous state (although minus the bit about flexi-discs, which probably shouldn't be there). 83.136.123.72 (talk) 20:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
As the old version is readily accessible via history, content can easily be restored when references are found. --NeilN talk to me 20:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on User:Drm310

Thanks for removing that speedy tag off [4] of my userpage. Seems like that other guy placed it there purely out of spite. --Drm310 (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on User:I dream of horses

Thank you for reverting vandalism repeatedly on my userpage. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. @ 01:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

You're very welcome! - Amaury (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Im Do Not Think I Made any mistakes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjuan101 (talkcontribs) 01:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia generally frowns upon shouting; plus, you changed a valid link to an invalid link. - Amaury (talk) 01:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'd like to follow up regarding the edit made recently to Disqus. As I noted in my earlier report, Disqus is commonly mispronounced as "discus" when in fact it is pronounced "discuss" as in discussions. If you visit the official Disqus blog, there's a blurb in the sidebar that confirms the proper pronunciation. Placeboaffect (talk) 17:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Amaury, that was not vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, man. Just an experiment to show the kids in my English class that people watch pages and correct vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.78.22 (talkcontribs)

My change to Giovanni was to remove Giovanni Capriglione, a redundant entry since Giovanni (name) already covers that person. If you still think that makes me a vandal or if you simply think my change was a bad idea, please elaborate on my talk page.

Thanks in advance.—67.101.5.38 (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

@67.101.5.38: You are a vandal, and you will now be blocked by an admin... Just kidding! April Fools! Well, it's March 31 for me still, but it's April 1 somewhere, right? Anyway, sorry about that. I will retract my warning. - Amaury (talk) 02:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)