User talk:Amaury/2021/February
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Here's a question to ponder – is this show actually notable enough for a standalone article? I'm starting to think it isn't – if you ignore the ratings sources, there are only two secondary sources: Animation Magazine and Common Sense Media (which I consider to be of marginal quality). I'm not sure this article would survive at WP:AfD. Really, this probably should just be a section at the Henry Danger article. And note that it was created by a Simulation12 sock. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Sorry I've been busy. We can ping Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968 as well for their thoughts. I mean, putting aside that it was created by a sock, it's still a television series. There are a plethora of articles that are like this—a few of them are in my sandbox—the only difference being that they're not spinoffs of anything, but I don't think that's really relevant. (Side Hustle is an example.) Amaury • 18:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- First, I don't intend to do anything myself. But if it's taken to AfD by somebody else, I'm a "merge to Henry Danger" vote. Second, WP:TVSHOW does not actually say every TV show deserves its own article. IOW, WP:GNG still applies. And for this short-lived animated series, I don't think GNG is met enough (i.e. this series is not notable enough) for an independent article – I think this particular show should be covered just in a section at the Henry Danger article: a few sentences of prose, and then cut the episode synopses from the episode table, and just present title, airdate, and ratings, etc. info in the table. (An alternate way to handle it would be to merge the episodes table to List of Henry Danger episodes and then transclude only the relevant portions of the table over to the Henry Danger article.) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- GNG is met in my opinion. Cleaner to have two article than a merged one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- First, I don't intend to do anything myself. But if it's taken to AfD by somebody else, I'm a "merge to Henry Danger" vote. Second, WP:TVSHOW does not actually say every TV show deserves its own article. IOW, WP:GNG still applies. And for this short-lived animated series, I don't think GNG is met enough (i.e. this series is not notable enough) for an independent article – I think this particular show should be covered just in a section at the Henry Danger article: a few sentences of prose, and then cut the episode synopses from the episode table, and just present title, airdate, and ratings, etc. info in the table. (An alternate way to handle it would be to merge the episodes table to List of Henry Danger episodes and then transclude only the relevant portions of the table over to the Henry Danger article.) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
User Starklinson
Unfortunately, they're back to editing. Based on the most recent edits, this editor will continue to bear watching – I doubt very much anything has been learned from the time off. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The running time varies from 21 to 24 minutes, as the episode "Sing it On" original broadcast of the episode aired from 8:00 to 8:21 p.m. (EDT). It is 22 minutes on Disney Plus since they add extra credits at the end. Since episode lengths should go off the original broadcast, that was correct, the only thing wrong was adding extra space in between. I knew what i was doing. I hope this did not come off as rude in any way! Anthony hello123 (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Clearly you didn't, as you couldn't even format it properly. Runtimes are based off of Amazon. Amaury • 03:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, i will make sure i work on my formatting. Also, it was unclear to me that you were sourcing runtimes from Amazon, Different platforms say different things, so i went with the other platform, not knowing that you were already sourcing runtimes from Amazon. My mistake. Anthony hello123 (talk) 04:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I am a founder and apart of the administrative team at the official Nickelodeon Side Hustle Wiki. We work and strive to find and fix any errors on our wiki and any other sites to help improve, support, and inform our viewers about the right content and the information to find it. I do intensive research 24/7 for confirmed, official, and constructive info for this series. If my edits are not approved then I will no longer edit on Wikipedia due to disrespect, your negligence, and failure to cooperate with me. Thanks for your time. Sincerely, Side Hustle Wiki Administrative Team Founder, Nicklas S. Webb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicklas347 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Good riddance, then. We don't need someone here who can't follow our guidelines and policies. For example, see WP:COPYVIO. And Wikias are not reliable sources for anything. Amaury • 20:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Nickelodeon picture format
And as a 15 year editor here, you clearly have WP:OWNership issues with all Nickelodeon show articles. Stop being so terse and awful to other editors; your attitude I see is already driving off others from even daring to edit Nick articles. Nate • (chatter) 06:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
And now stay off my talk page (and don't template me); I'm done. I have better things to do around here than fight over this. It's no wonder many others on the project avoid Nickelodeon and Disney Channel articles and projects like the plague. Nate • (chatter) 06:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)