Jump to content

User talk:Bcritical

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!


Hello, Carrolquadrio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Archive
Archives

Useful places to look

[edit]


Holy crap. I've never seen that page before....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:39, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The idea is to have information that might help others ask questions to write with e.g. knowing about bulldogs, native english speaker.. etc. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: User:Antandrus has/is a nice simple userpage - also see User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior for a chuckle Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hope your day is going well --Bidgee (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey carrol! Sorry for wasting your time with this message, but I gotta get these modules done somehow! Have a good day! x (GraceGoodTin (talk) 01:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Hotel Hollywood, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not submit multiple drafts as it clogs up the review process and will wind up taking longer to get reviewed. Reviewers will look at Draft:Hotel Hollywood which was previously submitted and waiting in queue.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 02:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, disregard. There was a redirect to the same name to another draft you submitted. I put the draft back in queue for review. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I realised I made a bit of a mess, which I tried to fix by putting a delete tag on the Hollywood Hotel. I did create the new draft: Hotel Hollywood which is the correct name but which I have now renamed to Doris Goddard (I used the move option rather than create a new draft - so I have learned this process now). Doris is notable in her own right, recognised as an iconic women in May this year. I put the information pertaining to Hotel Hollywood at the bottom of that article. Does this work now?--Carrolquadrio (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doris Goddard (October 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This article needs to be rewritten according to Wikipedia's guidelines on tone. Also need to remove facebook and youtube links as sources as these are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 08:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft on Doris Goddard

[edit]

Hi there, thanks for editing and re-submitting the draft on Goddard; I'm just doing some editing and then will publish it into mainspace. However, I think you should remove the section on Hotel Hollywood and start a new article about the hotel, as it doesn't really belong in Goddard's article - she was one owner of many. MurielMary (talk) 04:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Doris Goddard has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Doris Goddard. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 04:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doris Goddard has been accepted

[edit]
Doris Goddard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Carrolquadrio! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:40, Saturday, February 15, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Carrolquadrio! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:40, Saturday, February 15, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Okay...another page to look at...

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Awards. If you look at many user's pages, they collect them like stickers/decals on a car....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Carrolquadrio! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:33, Sunday, February 23, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Carrolquadrio! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:35, Sunday, February 23, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your awesome work. Bidgee (events) (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Doing well with all the tech issues Bidgee (demonstration) (talk) 23:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Here is a cookie for helping me while I had audio issues. Bidgee (demonstration) (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
For helping my confidence in contributing in class :) Copheetalk (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hotel Hollywood

[edit]

Hello, Carrolquadrio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hotel Hollywood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JMHamo The article was originally a section of Doris Goddard article. It was suggested that it should be a seperate article. I have now submitted it for review. Thanks.

AfC notification: Draft:Hotel Hollywood has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hotel Hollywood. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Robert McClenon I have added a sentence on the hotel's notable architecture. There is more to be found in the heritage records, it is just not my area of research. I did appreciate the link you included, always keen to learn more.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Hollywood (building) has been accepted

[edit]
Hotel Hollywood (building), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tools

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Prosesize and Wikipedia:HotCat as things that make editing easier. The first is good at getting a handle on article size - WRT Stubs - see Wikipedia:Stub Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber I was thinking more about changing the stub assessment rating and then categorising the article with a new assessment rating (since I am going through and marking them anyway). Draft papers will be assessed prior to upload to the stub and the final article will be around 2000 words. --Carrolquadrio (talk) 02:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, okay look at Wikipedia:Content_assessment#Grades, especially the "Reader's experience" column. I use this column when rating articles. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cas Liber I am very familiar with this section, this is one of the first tools I give students. So it is okay for me to assess as an editor and not an administrator? --Carrolquadrio (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely! For the most part, admins are just ordinary editors who've been vetted and allowed some extra tools. Anyone can rate up to B class. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cas Liber You aint ordinary! Good to know thanks. user:Fransplace see this thread, for your info.
Cas Liber Whilst I consider myself to be ethical, can i confirm there would be no conflict of interest?
Okay - current wiki-etiquette is roughly as follows - it's perfectly fine for an editor to rate their own article as stub, start or C-class. B-class is in a bit of a grey area these days but you could argue the case if you think it is pretty comprehensive and just about every fact is cited with an inline reference. Best to let someone else rate it to be safe in most cases. GA status has a process (WP:GAN), as do A-class and FA class (WP:FAC). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from CR4ZE

[edit]
Hello, Bcritical. You have new messages at Alink10273's talk page.
Message added 10:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I would love to see the Neel Kolhatkar page submitted at WP:DYK and have a left a message to your student regarding this. — CR4ZE (T • C) 10:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
Thanks for the help this semester Carrol :) AnnabelW98 (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks AnnabelW98 that is so sweet - literally and actually! It always feels good to be appreciated. Good luck with the rest of your studies.

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Thank you for being a great Wikipedia Educator and role model! Fransplace 23:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

@Fransplace: Squee and thanks! I love the innovative work you are doing and it's great to be a part of it. --Carrolquadrio (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thank you for all your help this semester and for always replying quickly to my emails :) BigGussy (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BigGussy: Determination is key. You persisted and it paid off, well done to you.--Carrolquadrio (talk) 01:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK - Isle of the Dead (Tasmania)

[edit]

Hi Carrol, just letting you know that my article is featured on the main page today in the DYK section!! Super happy :) --Southpaw20 (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fantastic @Southpaw20: this is a terrific piece of work, you should be very proud. How great is this acknowledgement of your work? Well done and thanks for taking the time to share this news with me. I think you can take off the Newbie template now--Carrolquadrio (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
Thanks so much for all of your help throughout the semester! Southpaw20 (talk) 01:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed for DYK nomination by Emilyhawthorne

[edit]

User:Emilyhawthorne nominated Template:Did you know nominations/chocoholic as part of a student project, and the process is now stalled. Are you able to assist at the nomination page? Also, there is a general conversation about student editors on Wikipedia in progress at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Student_editors if you want to participate. Thanks. Flibirigit (talk) 01:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Flibirigit: Thank you for alerting me to this page and the discussion. Are you asking me to make edits on the student page in line with the comments left or something else? I understand that students not making the changes can be a burden on reviewers (despite best efforts to encourage ongoing participation). User:Fransplace You might also like to join the general discussion and submit some suggestions.--Carrolquadrio (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you or anyone wants to adopt the Chocoholic nomination it would be great. Please do join the conversation list above. The more the merrier! Flibirigit (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fligirigit What would 'adopting the nomination' involve?

A kitten for you!

[edit]

To brighten up your day! Thanks for all your help throughout this course

Lawrys16 (talk) 23:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

A cute kitten for you. Enjoy your day!

Holleydolly (talk) 23:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
:) Kkk11GGG (talk) 23:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
After a hard day's work! Bidgee (talk) 04:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

very happy to join your class! thank you so much

Mewgulfszd (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU

[edit]

Thank you for always making class fun Carrol

Rubypp (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

[edit]
Thank you! Have a good day! Mavis67 (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the G.O.A.T.

[edit]

Thank you for all your ongoing support through the semester !

A1707323 (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
Thanks for the bubble tea. Knock off with a beer! Tdevonald (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bodybuilder

[edit]
[[Juan Ferrero - Inside Wrestling|100px]] Bodybuilder
Thanks for being such a strong leader! Hansoloburger (talk) 00:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thanks for being a great tutor Carrol!! Tjwriter101 (talk) 00:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

[edit]

Thanks for being THE G.O.A.T., you're a legendary tutor!

Theboeksplein (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thank you for sending us joy and love in the tutorials! ^^ Chubbylilrabbit (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Thank you for always being so paw-sitive and helpful Carrol!

CC123T (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

[edit]
Thanks for your help. Xmx iii (talk) 03:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Thank you for your teaching :)

Smile2805 (talk) 03:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
Thankyou so much for tutoring us this semester Carrol! And thankyou for the burger. Bs4234 (talk) 04:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Thanks for being so helpful! :) Aoujwt (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

[edit]
Thanks for your dedication for us. always! H020652 (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A toast sandwich for you!

[edit]
Thank you for being a great Wikipedia guide! You have been very helpful. Here is a toast sandwich to accompany your tea time :) AnggotheManggo (talk) 04:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Template:Educational assignment

[edit]

Hi Carrolquadrio. Since you, Fransplace and R stasey all appear to be involved with class projects for the University of Sydney, I thought the three of you might be able to help sort this out (perhaps even off-Wikipedia). It appears that some your students are adding {{Educational assignment}} to the talk pages of articles they're trying to improve (which might've been something they were advised to do), but they're just adding the bare-bones template (e.g. here) without specifying any parameters. It might be more helpful to others editing the same articles if more information was added to the templates like a link to the course's page or the dates of the course. I'm not very familiar with the workings of these types of templates, but I have also seen {{Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment}} used in the past by other students and this template does seem to allow for more information to be provided. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly thank you for taking an interest in our work. I am familiar with the kinds of templates you are suggesting, as is Fransplace, who is actually the best person to discuss this with. My personal opinion, FWIW is that there is not a real point to placing them on articles and in some cases they cause more problems by being there. There is always a way forward and collaboration is key to making things work, thanks again.--Carrolquadrio (talk) 05:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Hi Carrol, I really enjoyed chatting with you throughout these 12 weeks of tutorial classes! Here's some WikiLove for you! Thank you so much!! :)

Chubbylilrabbit (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carrol The Legend

[edit]

Hi Carrol!

This is the end of a journey! Thank you, for being such a great mentor! I hope you enjoy my Wikipedia article. :D Theboeksplein (talk) 01:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Great work! Fransplace (talk) 00:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Hope all is well, will have to try and catch up. Bidgee (talk) 00:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

morning

Georgia.gunnis (talk) 22:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Good Morning Carrol. Georgia.gunnis (talk) 22:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

[edit]
here's a pie 4 u Olliep2002 (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

[edit]
In honour of a brilliant falafel kebab I had at work the other day, enjoy! Lachlad (talk) 00:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

[edit]

Thank you for your help!

BeaClaire (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Thanks for all your help this semester Carrol, you made the class a lot of fun :)

Ddra5202 (talk) 10:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Carrolquadrio! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 09:41, Friday, June 4, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

DYK for Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students

[edit]

On 11 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that it is compulsory for educational providers of international students to register with CRICOS in Australia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broken DYK nom

[edit]

Hey, just letting you know that your DYK nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Greenlandic people in Denmark had broken syntax and is also incomplete. You might want to correct it, or otherwise WP:G7 it (if you don't want to bother with fixing it). Feel free to ask me if you have any further questions! Elli (talk | contribs) 21:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elli Oh dear, I see that. I now use the bot. What do I need to do to correct this? --Carrolquadrio (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think you could copy the rest of the template in from the instruction section of Template:NewDYKnomination, and note in your comment the date that you meant to make the nomination. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Elli I've tried that, do you mind checking on this for me?--Carrolquadrio (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the syntax on the updated nomination. Would you like me to transclude it in the log, or do you want to? Elli (talk | contribs) 22:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for fixing this, awesome Elli. --Carrolquadrio (talk) 23:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Glad I could help, and thanks for the coffee! Elli (talk | contribs) 10:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Greenlandic people in Denmark

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Greenlandic people in Denmark at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article revision please: The road to Kokoda

[edit]

Good evening. Could you ask Lawrence Wirenkyi to review his edits and my revisions to The Road to Kokoda, as it almost seems his additions were meant for Kokoda Front Line!. Also there are URLs that are not revolving. Added feedback to his Talk page. Thank you, Q8682 (talk) 11:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Justin Clarke

[edit]

On 1 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Justin Clarke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following a career-ending injury while playing Australian rules football, Justin Clarke became a Rhodes scholar in 2021? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Justin Clarke. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Justin Clarke), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jack White (music producer)

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Jack White (music producer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nominations

[edit]

Carrolquadrio, both of your remaining DYK nominations—Template:Did you know nominations/Jack White (music producer) and Template:Did you know nominations/Greenlandic people in Denmark—currently have significant issues that have not been addressed for over three weeks, among them being that neither article has been expanded fivefold as required. If nothing has been done to address these issues within the next seven days, or perhaps sooner, the nomination will be marked for closure. I hope we hear from you before then. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset Thank you for taking the time. I cannot expand them fivefold at this time personally so I accept the nomination will be closed. I will try a new approach to submitting in the future, with the aim of a better outcome Carrolquadrio Carrolquadrio (talk) 02:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Here, have a kitten, everyone loves kittens.

Philip1789 (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bcritical! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, adding a map to the info box, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Moshe Lang. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Carolyn Quadrio has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carolyn Quadrio. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Quadrio (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Too much of the content is unsupported by referencing. Please ensure that every material point is backed up by reference to a reliable source. (This includes every paragraph finishing with a citation, because otherwise by definition they finish unsupported.) Thank you. --
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bcritical! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal notice

[edit]

Hello,

Just an FYI that you were listed as the relevant tutor in the appeal linked to this issue. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear thanks for the ping. I am looking into it. I am not personally familiar with this student ,but they seem to have flipped the 'do not's' from the course material. Bcritical (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Quadrio (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:NPROF says that "The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area." but the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy impact factor and ranking doesn't appear to show that it satisfies it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 08:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Quadrio (January 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"Appointments" and "Teaching" sections mostly unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia assignments

[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you've been running student editing assignments for the past couple years, but I'm not sure if you're aware of the Education noticeboard. It's a good idea to let the community know you'll be running classes if you aren't working with one of the established Education programs, and it's a good place to connect with support from the existing program in Australia. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian (Wiki Ed) this course was being run with consultation from Wikipedia Australia. I am not included in those details but I assure you we were working with established programs and the community was aware of the course. Thank you for the concern. @Fransplace Bcritical (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carolyn Quadrio

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bcritical. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carolyn Quadrio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Quadrio (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Quadrio (September 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Quadrio has been accepted

[edit]
Carolyn Quadrio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Somej (talk) 02:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thank you, Bcritical (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bcritical&oldid=1250594811"