User talk:Calvin999/Archive 20

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

→

Archive 25

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Outta My Head (Leona Lewis song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs written by Emeli Sandé may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lotus Intro may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Skyfall

There is a Featured Article and a GA on Bond themes, and I worked on both. SchroCat has seen no problems, and said he will clean up the article. And after all, the backlog is so big that you never know when a review will be done. But if you see errors, correct them instead of complaining! At least I am working on improvements. igordebraga ≠ 23:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

First, that FA was promoted six years ago, which means it has probably deteriorated a bit, and the GA is pretty bad and doesn't meet basic MOS. Second, Schrocat said he has no problems with you nominating it, not no problems with the article. He knows the article isn't up to scratch, that's why he took my advice of withdrawing it and he asked me to help with it as I am experienced in writing song articles, whereas he is more familiar with film articles. If he didn't think it had problems, he wouldn't have said he would clean up, no? As there would be nothing to clean up. Just because a backlog is big, doesn't mean you should be taking "risks" with half done articles. I will help on "Skyfall", but it needs a lot of time spent on it, which is why it shouldn't be nominated. If I was uninvolved with this and saw it nominated in its current condition, honestly, I would quick fail it.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Outta My Head (Leona Lewis song)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your reverts of my edits

I'm trying to work out why you object to my edits, and exactly what "This wrongs the references" means. I presume you objected to me removing the '|publisher=' fields, this is actually done in line with the practice laid down in Template:Citation/doc#Publisher, which states "publisher: Name of publisher; may be wikilinked if relevant. Not normally included for periodicals." Other facets of the edits is the italic rendering of the publications. You will find that the italicisation or otherwise are in line with WP:ITALICS, as well as the styles adopted for each of the publication per their Wikipedia articles. I'd like to understand from your viewpoint how this makes the references "wrong". Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 08:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

You was removing publisher and making work parameters italics when they shouldn't be. The references are perfectly formatted anyway, and you changed them so that they had missing and incorrect parameters. That is why I undid them, and it was partial on two of them.  — AARON • ^TALK 10:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

What Now (Rihanna song)

I randomly started it lol. Here's the information about it that I found. Feel free to add it to the article. I will add smthg tomorrow. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 23:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll try but I have an exam on Shakespeare for Thursday that I need to spent the next few days revising then Friday morning I go to Germany until Monday night. But after that I will be very free as I would have finished university then.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Alright. Good luck with everything! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 23:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll try to add some stuff over the next couple of nights so it can be DYK'd.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

I expanded the CR, it would be nice if you can add something in Composition so we can DYK it :) ! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 20:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I will try tomorrow.  — AARON • ^TALK 21:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Skyfall review

I've begun the GA review for Skyfall (song) and have noted a few initial concerns. Could you comment there when you have a chance? Thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Calvin999. You have new messages at Talk:House of Plantagenet/GA1.
Message added Norfolkbigfish (talk) 06:45, 6 June 2013 (UTC);. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Aaron, Finished the last lot, can I have some more notes on this?

Thanks

Rihanna's Grammys

Hello,

An editor on the List of awards and nominations received by Rihanna page found that she wasn't the recipient of the 2012 Best Rap Song award (as she wasn't a contributing songwriter) so has changed the page to reflect that. I've changed the main page to show six for coherency, providing an explanatory note; but I was wondering, considering a lot of the press asserted it was 7, whether she was credited for another award or there has been a mistake along the line. (I thought I'd contact you because you've done a lot of work on related articles). Thanks! —JennKR | ☎ 15:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

What song was this for?  — AARON • ^TALK 09:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

All of the Lights - as the performing artist she won the Grammy Award for Best Rap/Sung Collaboration but not the Grammy Award for Best Rap Song as you are required to write/co-write. —JennKR | ☎ 18:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Well if that's the case then that win can't be included in her tally.  — AARON • ^TALK 18:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree, it's just that Rihanna's official website (I think it's rihannanow.com ?) reported she had 7, but I guess they must have just went along with what the media reports said. —JennKR | ☎ 19:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I disagree. How come we go again highly reliable music sources such as MTV News and Billboard? I also posted on my talk, prior her performance of "Stay" at the Grammys the host himself (organizer of the Grammys too LL Cool J) said that she has won 7 Grammys! I still think that there is an issue with the Grammy database or whatever.— Tomíca^(T2ME) 19:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Mariah

Even if your vote does count, it is still not enough to delete it, you are only one person....anyway, if you want to get technical, both articles are wrong...because it really is her eleventh studio album......her holidays albums, Merry Christmas and Merry Christmas II You as well as her soundtrack album glitter should not be counted as studio albums..Hashtag beautiful (talk) 21:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

My vote does count, it's me who has proposed it be deleted. My vote counts just as much as anyones. That's not a technical point, at all. Critics refer to this as her 14th album, so we do too. Fact is, it is her 14th studio album. Holiday and soundtrack albums are still studio albums. Your opinion of how it should be does not matter.  — AARON • ^TALK 21:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

But Holiday albums consist mostly of holiday cover songs from other artists......it is not a complete work of original songs....the majority of a studio album should consist of original songs....not covers...so, no, holiday albums should not count..........Hashtag beautiful (talk) 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

So? Original or traditional has nothing to do with it. They are still studio albums. Listen to yourself, you have no idea what you are talking about. By your reasoning, albums can be part studio part holiday/soundtrack. Again, that is your opinion. We don't use your opinion, we use sourced and critical facts. I'm finished with this conversation.  — AARON • ^TALK 22:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

S&M

Just having a play around with this now and come across the following "two remixes by Audé and Samson.[18] On February 28, 2011, a compilation was released worldwide as a digital package consisting of remixes by Audé, Sampson and Bermudez.[19]" Is Samson and Sampson the same person, or two different people? If the former, which is the correct spelling? Ta - SchroCat (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

• ps. I presume Sidney Samson is one (if not both) of those mentioned? I'm working on a copy here, just to avoid screwing too much up on the main article. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 12:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

• Yeah same guy but it's a typo lol  — AARON • ^TALK 15:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Renomination with problems remaining

I've started a thread about your renomination of Lovebird (song) at GAC. J Milburn (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: A favour

I would rather comment on the FLC but I don't know ANYTHING about lists. I have never edited, or read one. My love is love (talk) 07:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Calvin999. You have new messages at Talk:House of Plantagenet/GA1.
Message added Norfolkbigfish (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Aaron, Finished the last lot, anything else?

Thanks

Hi Aaron, thanks for the time and effort you took in reviewing this. It has been a pleasure and as it is my first GA quite an experience for me. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for What Now (Rihanna song)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

My GAN

Can you please start with the review of Revel Presents: Beyoncé Live and The Beyoncé Experience Live either today or from next Monday? I'm going to Turkey in Saturday so I won't be on Wiki more than one week. My love is love (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Today or from next Monday?  — AARON • ^TALK 13:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes. You choose what is better for you. Actually it can be any day after next Monday. :D My love is love (talk) 13:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Ah okay. I will do them Monday then.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

WP:TFL

Hi Calvin999, a list you recently nominated at WP:FLC has been promoted! I was wondering if you'd consider nominating it for inclusion on the main page some time, at Today's Featured List? Either way, it'd be great if you could participate there. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I haven't had an FL be promoted for three months. I have one pending, but it hasn't been promoted.  — AARON • ^TALK 13:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, have you checked lately? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by Cheryl Cole was promoted three months ago on 13 March 2013 and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs written by Emeli Sandé/archive1 has been at FLC for 2 and a half months with 5 supports and all comments addressed. I'm definitely aware of what nominations of mine have been passed lol.  — AARON • ^TALK 13:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hmmm, have you checked lately? The Rambling Man (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Well now it is, but it wasn't before. It didn't say anywhere nor did anyone tell me. Usually the review gets archived, it says who promoted it at the top and then the bot adds the star. But thanks. So I can nominate this for Today's featured list?  — AARON • ^TALK 14:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I had promoted it before I left the first message. You can nominate it at TFL, yes, otherwise I wouldn't have left you this message in the first place! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Lol well it didn't show up anywhere! Not on the article, article talk, review etc.  — AARON • ^TALK 14:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

No, that's because it's a transclusion and I simply move the whole nomination from one page to another. You could, however, always check the FLC closure log, Goings-on, or New featured content, WP:FLC, WP:FL and the Featured List log for June, all of which were updated before I sent you the first message! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of songs written and recorded by Alicia Keys

Hello! Your submission of List of songs written and recorded by Alicia Keys at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar · · 04:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs written and recorded by Katy Perry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All I Ever Wanted (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Just a Fool

Seems like you're busy with Leona Lewis project, so I decided to do "Just a Fool" alone. I can't wait for Lotus to be GT. Maybe the next time we can do together on "Your Body" instead! HĐ (talk) 10:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I haven't done anything with the Leona Lewis Wikicup project for weeks...  — AARON • ^TALK 10:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

4

I have replied. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Lists of songs written/recorded by artists

Hi, I saw you've moved a lot of these pages so they say "written and recorded". I moved some of them back, because all the songs on those particular pages (Leona Lewis, Rihanna, Nicki Minaj and Katy Perry) are recorded by those artists, regardless of who wrote the songs. The titles imply something about the articles that isn't there - either that all the songs were both written and recorded by them, or it's all the songs they've recorded (regardless of writer), plus all the songs they've written (regardless of recording artist). However, when I came to Alicia Keys, I couldn't move the page back because you'd added the songs she wrote but didn't record. But I still think the "written and recorded" part of the title implies she both wrote and recorded all the songs, which isn't what the list is about. I also looked at Emeli Sandé and Adele, and I think the same applies there as to Keys (though in Sandé's case, I think she wrote all the songs she recorded, so maybe the old "written by" title was ok). I didn't see if there were any other lists that you'd moved. Sorry to be a pain, and I hope you understand why I moved the pages back. Of course, if you were planning to include songs written, but not recorded by, Lewis, Rihanna, Minaj and Perry (assuming they exist), the pages should be moved back - though I think you moved one to "written and/or recorded" before moving it on again, which might have actually been more clear! –anemoneprojectors– 17:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, I changed the Katy, Rihanna, Leona and Nicki ones to written and recorded because there are songs which they have written for others, plus also songs which are listed on BMI, which are songs they wrote but perhaps didn't record. Katy did have some for Kelly Clarkson on her list though.  — AARON • ^TALK 22:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

If there were songs written for others on all those lists then I apologise, but we know of at least two that Leona Lewis has written for others and I didn't see them on the list. Maybe you've added them since. I still think the title "List of songs written and recorded by X" is confusing though. Perhaps "List of songs written or recorded by X" is better, because then it includes all songs recorded by, all songs written by, and all songs both recorded and written by, and looks better than putting "written and/or recorded". –anemoneprojectors– 11:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I now see you've moved some to the "and/or" title. I think that's fine :-) –anemoneprojectors– 11:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

There's another discussion about this on my talk page under the section "List of songs recorded by Rihanna" that you should probably read. –anemoneprojectors– 19:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs written and recorded by Alicia Keys may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• article3403940.ece|title=Alicia Keys the girl who made Bob Dylan weep|work=[[The Times]]|publisher=[[News Corporation|date=February 24, 2008|accessdate=February 25, 2012|archiveurl=http://www.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs written and recorded by Alicia Keys may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]|publisher=[[Prometheus Global Media]]|accessdate=June 15, 2013}}</ref> "[[A Woman's Worth]]", written by Keys and [[Erika Rose]], is a "[[Jazz music|jazz]]-tinged"
• [[#O|O]]{{·}}[[#P|P]]{{·}}[[#R|R]]{{·}}[[#S|S]]{{·}}[[#T|T]]{{·}}[[#U|U]]{{·}}[[#W|W]]{{·}}[[#Y|Y]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs recorded by Nicki Minaj may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | {{sort|Minaj Nicki featuring Beenie Man|Nicki Minaj}} <br/> featuring [[Beenie Man]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Mariah Carey

How are you dear, just gotta ask can I put TOTAL SHIPMENTS AVAILABLE instead of total sales would this be more accurate? :) thanks Fidel 13:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Not because they aren't all shipments. Adding a "total available XXX" into the table is completely redundant. If something is removed, then it stays out.  — AARON • ^TALK 14:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

GA reviews for "Express" and "Show Me How You Burlesque"

Thanks a bunch for passing them ! HĐ (talk) 14:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

List of songs written and recorded by Adele

Sorry, buddy, this has to be one of the silliest article moves I have seen at WP. Oh and the others you have also moved. I trust you are now going to remove the songs that she recorded and did not write, perhaps for clarity, the article title should be "List of songs recorded and co-written by Adele" as she doesn't actually write songs, she co-writes!!! I note some articles have already been moved back, please be on notice that any not reverted will be subject to an RM in due course. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm just trying to work out which title for the lists applies best. Using Adele as an example, "List of songs written by" would mean including only the 10 she solely wrote. "List of songs recorded and co-written by" would exclude those 10 songs, thus that would be exclusion of content and would not be broad in coverage, just as it would be the other round that I said before. Only using ""List of songs recorded by" would mean that I'd have to remove all the BMI database songs for all the songs that each artist wrote but never it to an album. Do you see my points here? Unless you want me to create two separates lists for each artist? For example, "List of songs recorded by Emeli Sande", including only the songs from her album as well as songs which she has been featured on on other artists albums, and then a "List of songs written by Emeli Sande" which would include all her songs from her album, featured songs she co-wrote/wrote and then the other 70 or so entries she has on BMI? Another alternative, which I think would make some lists extremely long, would be to simply have for example "List of songs by Cheryl Cole", having one table for recorded, and another underneath for co-written/written.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Co-writing is still writing, so "List of songs written by Adele" would still be accurate. The list makes it clear that there are co-writers as it names them. As I said on my talk page, I don't think it's worth including songs on BMI that have never seen the light of day, because they're not notably written by the writer, because nobody has ever heard them (other than the writers). I say we should keep songs by writer and songs by performer in separate lists. –anemoneprojectors– 20:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

So Emeli's and Alicia's are okay so stay as "written and recorded" then? So you agree that songs written by X and songs recorded by X should be different lists? Same article, two tables or two completely different articles with different titles?  — AARON • ^TALK 20:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Emeli seems to be sorted per my talk page. Alicia is more complicated - see my comments there. –anemoneprojectors– 20:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The function of performer and songwriter are two totally and distinct functions (even if done by the same person(s) - what Aaron is trying to do is merge the two functions and it doesn't work. List of songs written and/or recorded by the Beatles? Doesn't work. Many of the song article lists have been moved from "List of XXX songs" to "List of songs recorded by XXX" to standardise the format, we really don't need the creation of different varieties just because one artist sings, another writes, another produces and yet another actually plays guitar. The merging of two distinct functions doesn't work for songs or any other items. I think the present format is clear and concise and cannot see any reason to vary from the Category:Lists of songs by recording artists standard wording. "Songs written by XXX" do not belong in "by recording artist." If Aaron wants to create "List of songs written by XXX" I won't be objecting (actually I'll be cheering), but there is a reason that Category:Songs by songwriter and Category:Songs by artist are separate, absolutely silly to try and merge them.--Richhoncho (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, there's no need to be so personal! Well I literally just changed Adele's back to how it was. She has covered a few songs so I guess 'recorded' is best for her. So you would welcome a "List of songs written by Alicia Keys" and a "List of songs recorded by Alicia Keys" then? At the moment and out of the lists I am editing, this only applies to Keys. Sande can stay as 'written by', her 'recorded by' list would be quite short as she has only released one album. It's at FLC at the moment as "List of songs written and recorded by Alicia Keys" so I don't really know what to do about it.  — AARON • ^TALK 21:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

So I guess the best thing to do is go back to the list of songs recorded by Alicia Keys, and then create a new list for songs written by her? What happens to the FLC? –anemoneprojectors– 21:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't know, I don't want to withdraw it. But I guess that is what I'm gunna have to do.  — AARON • ^TALK 21:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Response to Aaron. Bearing in mind your support of my RMs to standardise "List of songs by recording artist", I am confused and upset you would now wish to tear the whole bloody thing down. I daresay I will get over it :). But let's get back to what it should be as agreed by all three of us and over a period of time. --Richhoncho (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

When did I say I didn't want to make two separate lists? I do, but you're not bearing in mind that it is currently at FLC. So what do you prose happens? I'm guessing I've got to withdraw the FLC, make the changes and create a separate list, the nominate them as two FLCs, right?  — AARON • ^TALK 22:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

On a quick look, I think you will find there are songs on the list which were NOT recorded and written by Alicia. Some were recorded by, but not written and some vice versa. Don't think you have a choice. BTW. What about Katy Perry. She needs moving back too. --Richhoncho (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't interpret "written and recorded by" as being songs which are both written and recorded though. Well looks like I've gotta withdraw the nomination then, and work on two separate lists. I don't think Katy's was moved back because it has songs written for other artists in it. Maybe hers should be "written by" and not the original "recorded by" ? Thoughts?  — AARON • ^TALK 22:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The FLC review has already started. I don't know what to do about it, but I do think "songs written and recorded by Alicia Keys" means songs she both wrote and recorded. Katy Perry's list has two songs she didn't record, so it wouldn't be hard to remove those and move the page back. –anemoneprojectors– 07:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

(←) . OK I will RM both of them - if I have time I might even separate them into the two component parts. Merging the two different functions doesn't work. End of. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in this matter. I appreciate it wasn't easy for you, especially with the FL pending, but if it had passed it would have created more problems again. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

It's okay. Thanks for your help too.  — AARON • ^TALK 18:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Calvin999. You have new messages at Talk:Country Grammar/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Et3rnal 18:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Calvin999. You have new messages at Talk:Scream (Usher song)/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Et3rnal 18:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful (Mariah Carey song)

The song isn't called "hashtag beautiful", in the chorus Mariah Carey sings "you're beautiful" not "you're hashtag beautiful". The inclusion of # is so to encourage the song to be mentioned on twitter and therefore trend. As its not a spoken part of the title its purely stylistic. No one, vocally refers to the song as "hashtag beautiful", the only place this is relevant is in written form. its quite different to say the Kelly Rowland song which is actually called number one and written/expressed as "#1", where the # is actually spoken as "number". — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 11:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Collide (Leona Lewis and Avicii song)

Could you please comment at the discussion at Talk:Collide_(Leona_Lewis_and_Avicii_song)#Sampling seen that you have been involved in the article in the past? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 12:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Army of Me

See Talk:Army of Me (Christina Aguilera song)/GA1 review. Robin (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

A generic barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring "Army of Me" to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! Robin (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

• • Thanks.  — AARON • ^TALK 21:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Request

I was wondering if you could possibly vote at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs in Glee (season 1)/archive1. Robin (talk) 22:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Yep  — AARON • ^TALK 22:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of songs written by Alicia Keys

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Blank Page

I've passed it. Congrats. HĐ (talk) 04:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.  — AARON • ^TALK 10:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Masterpiece

Addressed your concerns for the above article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your Body

I think it's time for us to do Your Body (Christina Aguilera song) — HĐ (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

OKay.  — AARON • ^TALK 13:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Fidelove

Keep an eye on him/her? Goes on adding personal charts and radio charts and unsourced certifications and all. Getting annoying tbh. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

I Am... World Tour

I nominated I Am... World Tour for a GA yesterday but there seems to be a problem. Do you remember almost a year ago when you reviewed the article for [[I Am... World Tour (album)}]]? Then its name was I Am... World Tour and the name of the article for the tour was I Am... Tour. But later a user changed its name, so now when I nominated the tour article for GA, it appears that you are reviewing the article and it shows the review you wrote of the album article a year ago. Do you know what can I do about this? My love is love (talk) 07:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm lost lol  — AARON • ^TALK 13:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Ah okay. I see what you mean. I don't know what to do about it tbh.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Poison

I have done all of the corrections. :DMy love is love (talk) 07:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

GAN for "Ain't No Other Man"

Thanks for reviewing so quickly. HĐ (talk) 10:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

FLC: List of songs written by Alicia Keys

I generally anticipate supporting this article's promotion, it is well written and presented. I do have an issue with WP:CONTENTFORK (the redundancy of "songs written" and "songs recorded" lists) which I think needs to be examined.--ColonelHenry (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

I Am Your Leader

Thank you, I finished all the changes that you listed.--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 21:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Calvin999

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, Casliber (submissions) and Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Re

I understand. Thanks for your advice! HĐ (talk) 06:45, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Poison Gan

I have done everything here. My love is love (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Your Body

I think it's time, now. HĐ (talk) 03:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

By the way, could you please comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ain't No Other Man/archive1? Thanks! HĐ (talk) 03:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Glassheart Tour/GA1

 — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Glassheart

Hey Aaron, I was thinking about this too... we should start it soon, perhaps this week? But I'd like to discuss how we're going to do it cause the article is so big and there's so much information. Also since we've sometimes disagreed in the past about how best to do it I'd recommend that we discuss and perhaps do it section by section or we dragt the bits on a separate page before changing the article itself? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah that's fine. There is a lot of info, some bits will have to be cut tbh. Btw, I think that "Come Alive" should indeed come alive again, lots of articles have a lot of info with charts now.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

I agree. the "come alive" article was really detailed, however it was ultimately merged as users felt a lack of direct coverage from sources independent of the album and a lack of charting didnt make it notable :( Of the article's current sections, the track listing, credits, charts and release history are all good (don't you think?) I think the commercial performance section is good also, but you may wish to give it a once over for grammar etc, same for Critical Reception. Then the rest needs examining more closely. What do you think? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah but the person who instigated it hasn't been online for over a month, if you wanted I think you could create again. Yeah, it's the background and development sections which need shortening.  — AARON • ^TALK 17:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

GA promotion (What Now (song))

Congratulations! Review follows. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:What Now (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 20:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

While it's a relatively small subject, it's well-written and well-covered. A 30-second sample might be helpful for (for example) showing the transition from verse to chorus, but those are rather annoying, and perhaps I shouldn't encourage fair use.

"CD reviews: Rihanna, Ellie Goulding, Said the Whale". New Jersey On-Line. November 23, 2012. Retrieved May 29, 2013. sounded questionable, but when I checked, I discovered it's actually The Star-Ledger. I've updated accordingly.

On the whole, a pretty good article. These articles on very limited subjects always confuse me a little, as part of me wants to ask for more, but, of course, the subject's a small one that doesn't have substantially more to be said.

So, on the whole, I think this should be a GA. Congratulations. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

• Oh wow, thanks!  — AARON • ^TALK 21:01, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Did It Again GA review

Hi Calvin999!

I noticed you took up the GA review for Did It Again (Shakira song). I really don't want to come off as an impatient nominator but the review page is blank as of now. I was just wondering whether you will post the entire review there all at once or will you do it section by section....

Thank you, --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I thought I would have time to do this before I went on holiday. If you don't mind waiting I will review it on the 8th July, if not, then feel free to get someone else to take over or ask for the review to be deleted by an admin.  — AARON • ^TALK 22:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

No it's perfectly fine, take your time, I can wait :) Thanks for telling this to me! Enjoy your holiday/ wikibreak! :D --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 01:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay I am back now. Thanks, I had a great time.  — AARON • ^TALK 18:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, then I hope you'll carry out the review soon? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes I will do it tomorrow  — AARON • ^TALK 20:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for passing! Will you add the GA icon on the article page or should I? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bot will automatically do it when it updates the GA process with the old ID of which it was promoted.  — AARON • ^TALK 13:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Bionic (song)

Yeah, I think so too. — HĐ (talk) 14:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

It's one of only a few songs from the album that I actually like lol.  — AARON • ^TALK 14:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I've cleaned-up the "Background", "Live performances" and "Credits" sections. — HĐ (talk) 03:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review

Hi Calvin,

Thanks for agreeing to review Music of Sesame Street. It's been a week since you called dibs on it, though, and I was wondering if you were going to get to it. If not, please put it back in the queue. I'm only asking because GAs tend to languish for a long time. Thanks, and good luck in the Wikicup. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes I will do it today. Thanks.  — AARON • ^TALK 10:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I've addressed all your comments there. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/List of songs recorded by Nicki Minaj

Hey. Can you find an alt hook for Template:Did you know nominations/List of songs recorded by Nicki Minaj, and correct the statement in the list as well? If you can find an appropriate hook then ping me on my talk page and I'll check the nomination page as soon as I can. Thanks. - Shudde ^talk 10:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lovebird (song)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Lovebird (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rockstar 101, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Lovebird (song)

I have just promoted this to GA. The review follows. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lovebird (song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 19:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Right. Well. First of all, this article is fairly nearly there, but it has some issues.

First, though, the good. This article handles the reviews and analysis sections a lot better than most pop song articles, and they flow really well. Sources are a little sparse, but - correct me if I'm wrong - I believe the singer is still primarily known in the UK, so gets less coverage abroad? So we can let that pass.

However, there are a few issues with the opening few sections (the Lead through Production and composition). In general, this could use a copyedit, and... well, honestly, that's pretty much it, but I can be a bit more specific.

Lead:

• "The subject matter of the lyrics focus on how Lewis informers her lover that enough time has passed since their relationship ended for her to have developed as a person." - ignoring the glaring typo (should be informs), that's awkward phrasing, and has a lot of superfluous words, as well as a lack of clarity. I think what's meant is something like "The lyrics consist of Lewis informing her ex-lover that enough time has passed since their relationship for her to have moved on and to have developed as a person."
• "To promote "Lovebird", Lewis performed the song on Daybreak and Loose Women in the United Kingdom, in addition to La Voz in Spain." - Perhaps it's me not owning a television, but I have no idea what Daybreak, Loose Women, or La Voz are, and I'm certain people not from Britain won't either. Add a few descriptive words for each programme.
  • You don't need to own a TV to know what they are. I've added a description for each, but to be honest, if you don't know what they are, then click on them, that's the whole point of wiki-linking.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I know, but it's better if it's not necessary, if it's likely a significant proportion of the audience won't know what they are. After all, pop music is international, and it's not that unlikely a lot of Americans will be reading this as well. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
      • Like I said, that's the reason why they are linked. But I've given a description of what they are anyway. So this point is done.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
• Structure: The structure is kind of a mess. By the second paragraph, very fewconsecutive sentences have at all similar themes. The lead needs reconstructed into a basic narrative.
  • It is in a basic narrative. This is how all (well-written) music articles are written. It's certainly is for the 68 GA's of mine that have passed.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I apologise: let me clarify. The structure of the lead is a bit of a mess. I think a little reorganising to put related ideas together will help. It's not a huge mess, but it feels a little disjointed, and I'm not quite sure the paragraph divisions are in the right places. This is, however, one of the more difficult things to get "perfect" in an article. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
      • I think it's personal preference to be honest. Not all leads are the same, and this one is cohesive.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
        • Looking at it again, I've made a small rearrangement, and added a linking word. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Background

• The end of the first paragraph should read: "...had worked on a track with Scottish DJ Calvin Harris, and that Fraser T Smith would be producing for the album." Done.

Production

• "...produced by Josh Abrahams, Oligee and Coleman, under his production name Ammo" - who has the production name Ammo?
  • Coleman...  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Think we can fix that by putting parentheses around "under his production name, Ammo". I have done so. Also added an Oxford comma to help keep Coleman distinct from Oligee. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Live performances

• "Lewis leaves wearing an ivory sleeved dress and long skirt while she is trapped in the cage along with "jewelled eye decorations" in the video" - that makes no sense. She leaves the cage while being trapped in it?
  • She same dress that she wore while trapped in the cage. I have reworded.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I've rearranged it a little bit more. I think it's better to mention her costume in the setup, not at the end. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

A decent start. As I said, mostly copyediting. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, though I disagree with some points.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

One additional point: Besides the typo of "where", what, exactly, is wrong with this reverted edit? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lovebird_%28song%29&diff=566326524&oldid=566324840 I was trying to simplify the explanation by making it apply more specifically to this video. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

I think Lil-Unique reverted it because he might have felt that the addition of "the occasionally used" but might have been unnecessary and a bit pointless to include.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Looked everything over, and made a minor edit to deal with the last thing holding me back from full support. I am now happy to ✓ Pass. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks  — AARON • ^TALK 18:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lovebird (song)

The article Lovebird (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lovebird (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

...What? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

...Okay, seriously, what the hell is the bot doing? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Anyway, thread about the weird bot behaviour is here. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Anyway, as I was going to say before the bot went crazy, if you'd like me to review your other GAN, please ask. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your amazing work on You Don't Love Me (No, No, No), I award you this barnstar! Great job! — Status (talk · contribs) 21:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

• Ah thanks :-)  — AARON • ^TALK 23:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Piotrus (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of You Don't Love Me (No, No, No)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article You Don't Love Me (No, No, No) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Holiday56 -- Holiday56 (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of You Don't Love Me (No, No, No)

The article You Don't Love Me (No, No, No) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:You Don't Love Me (No, No, No) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Holiday56 -- Holiday56 (talk) 06:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of You Don't Love Me (No, No, No)

The article You Don't Love Me (No, No, No) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:You Don't Love Me (No, No, No) for comments about the article. Well done! Holiday56 (talk) 14:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Whitney Houston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sparkle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Glassheart

Hey Aaron,

I hope you're well. Sorry I've been a bit ill so I wasn't on here much. I've copy edited Glassheart from the singles section downwards. Do you want to take a look and tell me what you think? I think the critical reception could do with a read-over. Once we're happy with that we could look at the earlier sections of the album? → Lil – ℧niquԐ 1 ^{-{ Talk }-} 21:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey, hope you're okay now. Yeah I will have a look.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Finally, at the tenth attempt, S&M (song)‎ has the cherished gold star it thoroughly deserves. Well done for keeping plugging away at it until it now represents the very best we have to offer. - SchroCat (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you :-). I couldn't have done it without you!  — ₳aron 21:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

		The Music Barnstar
		We have had our differences but your commitment is exemplary – well done Graham Colm (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks :-)  — ₳aron 21:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs recorded by Whitney Houston may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• !scope=row| "[[Joy to the World]"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs recorded by Whitney Houston may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• !scope=row style="background-color:#D8BFD8"| "[[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs recorded by Whitney Houston may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Billboard]]|publisher=[[Prometheus Global Media]]|date=August 9, 2013|accessdate=August 14, 2013}}</ref> "[[Hold Me (Teddy Pendergrass & Whitney Houston song)|Hold Me]]" was released as the lead

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Nicki Minaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbadian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Owl City

Hi Aaron! There's a discussion regarding Owl City on the article's talk page. I was wondering if you could possibly comment on it? Thanks! Chihciboy (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

A Simple Gratitude

Hi Calvin999. I just want to thank you for reviewing the Fearless article that i had just included on the GA nomination. Right now, I am still hoping that this article will be considering as a good article.

Thank you so much. :) Nofoolz (talk) 12:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Elmo's World GAC

Hi Calvin, since you reviewed the last Sesame Street article I had up at GAC, would you mind taking at look at my latest, Elmo's World? I usually don't make a request to bypass the queue, but I need the points if I'm going to move on the finals of the Wikicup, which is something I'd really like to accomplish. By that token, I would greatly appreciate it if you also looked at my most recent FAC (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Format of Sesame Street/archive1), which happens to be about The Show as well. Thanks so much. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Belated congratulations

I've been away quite a bit recently, and so I missed the promotion of S&M (song)‎ a couple of weeks ago. Top marks for your perseverence with this article, and I am very pleased that your efforts have finally been rewarded. Brianboulton (talk) 12:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks :-)

Gary Barlow - genre

Hey Calvin. Can you revert the genre for Gary Barlow page? Yids2010 was not allow other users to revert any genre. But according to AllMusic, genre says pop/rock and classical. As for soft rock was not supported by citation and hasn't cited from AllMusic at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.177.235 (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

1. Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
2. Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
3. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
4. Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
5. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
6. Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
7. Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
8. Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Re:Hey

That's quite alright- I was very happy for you when I saw it had finally been promoted! I just wanted to highlight that it wasn't only the likes of Ealdgyth and Cwmhiraeth who were producing good work. I know we've not always agreed on certain editorial issues, but I certainly appreciate the work you've done for Wikipedia. Hope to see you in next year's Cup! J Milburn (talk) 14:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

:-)  — ₳aron 16:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Let There Be Love

This was unexpected.... See -HERE → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 18:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm surprised but not shocked. I've been hearing rumours that this is a single for weeks on end now. It is an outstanding song, one of her best for sure, and definitely the best on Lotus. I could have done with a bit more of her in the video singing to the lyrics instead of so many people making L's with their finger and thumb lol. Nice concept though. The lyrics sound more sexual than the message in the video lol.  — ₳aron 16:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Exactly. I loved this song when I heard it, so much more appeal than YB. Very surprised its not been properly released and to me its a sexual dancefloor filler not an empowering uplifting anthem. But hey its Xtina and she's obviously going for the "same love" effect. I won't complain. I just pray that she now releases the song fully with an uber hot EP (remixes and an acoustic version/piano/ballad version) and redeems Lotus cause genuinely Lotus was MILES better than Bionic. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 18:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, the remixes of Your Body are so much better than the original. I agree with everything you said. I'm not the biggest Christina fan or her now flawed voice, but this is a killer song.  — ₳aron 20:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

if you get chance can you please have a look at "When Love Takes Over"? I think its almost FA-ready. I compared it to your "S&M" article and it doesn't look far off. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 20:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure that I'm the best person to ask for FAC advice (promoted on the tenth nomination and all) but I don't mind going through it for you?  — ₳aron 20:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Erm I haven't nominated it yet but I'm sure with all your experience you'll pick up things I've missed. Its been through to FA once before but got declined because of the timing. At that time Legolas was helping me ... but we all know what happened there. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 22:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

To be honest I don't really know what happened there. Something to do with faking Billboard refs?  — ₳aron 22:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

He faked a whole load of Madonna book references amongst other "inflations". → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 15:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh okay.  — ₳aron 16:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Gypsy and Aphrodite

Hi Aaron, I noticed you had taken up the reviews for "Aphrodite" and "Gypsy (Shakira song)". First of all, I want to thank you for reviewing so many of my ga nominations and I'm really grateful for that. Secondly, I wanted to know if you're planning to review them soon. I have exams coming up so hopefully you could review them soon before I get caught up. If you can't, well no problem I can wait, but please don't fail them if I don't respond quickly. Thanks again! :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes I will do all of them tonight.  — ₳aron 17:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Wow thanks! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Dive

Hello Aaron, any chance you'll be reviewing Dive soon. Cheers. Et3rnal 11:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Yep  — ₳aron 12:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Wow, an insta-pass. Cheers! Et3rnal 15:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of songs recorded by Whitney Houston

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)