User talk:Dante8

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Dante8, good luck, and have fun. --role^player 20:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pushing an agenda

Hi Dante8,

I notice that virtually all of your edits have consisted of removing images of male religious figures, adding images of female religious figures, and moving them to the most prominent locations, even in articles on topics like Imam and Rabbi where there are virtually no women at all who serve in the role. This is intended to be an encyclopedia, not a vehicle for advocacy. Articles should describe reality, and therefore should discuss but should not give undue prominence to particular points of view or historical counterexamples. Thanks for your attention to this. Glenfarclas (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Priest has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://paganwiccan.about.com/od/wiccantraditions/p/Gardnerian.htm.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dante8. You have new messages at Wikipedia:New_contributors'_help_page.
Message added 14:51, 1 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Schrandit (talk) 10:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Stewardesses for Women's Rights. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. In this edit you removed vary valid templates without doing anything to address the underlying problem. Drmies (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dante8 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schrandit (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Urmi Basu

A tag has been placed on Urmi Basu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kedster (talk / contribs) 15:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathalie Morin for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Nathalie Morin, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Morin until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Burpelson AFB (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

It is not allowed to edit while logged out to create the false illusion of support, or to evade a policy such as WP:3RR. Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dante8, I have blocked the IP you used for 1 week; you may continue to edit while logged in. However, if you continue to do so, you may find this account blocked as well. T. Canens (talk) 04:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I myself would also would request again that you reply here, Dante8, on the many issues surrounding your edits. This is a community project, and we are supposed to collaborate with each other. Part of collaboration includes discussing things with other editors. A recent case I was part of led to my realization that to ignore other editors is actually considered disruptive. Under this guideline: "Does not engage in consensus building: repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits." For you to continue to edit and not talk to anyone despite repeated requests, you are being "borderline" disruptive: it's a bad habit to keep. Please speak up... Doc9871 (talk) 08:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on Mugai (please log-in before posting Feedback requests, etc.)

Reply

Ok I will not edit or post requests while logged out anymore and I will only access wikipedia from this computer. Please excuse if this was not the place where I was supposed to reply to your complaints, as I could not find any other place.

It's totally fine to access Wikipedia from other computers, so long as you log in. What you cannot do is come in from different IPs on anonymous IP accounts, as this gives the illusion of your being multiple people. So long as you log-in, you can edit from any IP since your account will still be the listed editor. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback reply

Posted here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_April_8#Eleanor_.22Nellie.22_Zabel_Willhite. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Dubowe

review Done. it would be nice if you taught yourself how to make the reference-list look better; "raw links" are somewhat ugly. consider <ref>[http://www.website.com ''website's name/newsarticle's title'']</ref> instead of just <ref>http://www.website.com</ref> Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 18:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Dubowe ref list

I think I fixed the ref list; somebody should check to make sure it's right. Thanks!

Yes, almost. What was missing was [ ] around it, without '' — like this Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback reply

Posted here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_April_15#Laura_X. As mentioned a couple posts up, you need to clean up your links; it'll help people locate the evidence articles if the weblinks ever change, and it'll make your page look a lot smoother and more professional. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebecca Garfein

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rebecca Garfein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Garfein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Garfein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Garfein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback reply

Hello, Dante8. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_May_15#User:Dante8.2FDeaf_Women_United.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your page has been userified; if you receive a Speedy Deletion notice, be advised it applies to the space where you draft used to be on the articlespace. It is not a proposal to delete your draft, which is safe on your Userspace. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:09, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback reply

Hello, Dante8. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_May_16#Kate_Swift.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

You can find live help on Wikipedia's
help chat

Hello, Dante8. Lapatronne (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC) replied to your request for feedback.[reply]
Best regards, the Wikipedia requests for feedback team.

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Dante8. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you! Obsidi♠n^Soul 18:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	nice article Harmony Hammond -- Slowking4 (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dante8. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_July_4#Gwyneth_Bebb.
Message added SPhilbrick T 22:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Debbie Goddard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Debbie Goddard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Debbie Goddard

The article Debbie Goddard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I nominated for speedy, and it was contested claiming she is notable for some of her positions. I am unable to locate reliable sources to establish such notability, but am changing the CSD to PROD in case someone else can find such reliable secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dante8. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 August 6.
Message added 12:24, 7 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quasi human | Talk 12:24, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Dante8. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you!
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

Miguel AG ^(talk) Review me! 23:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Dante8. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you! Ma®©usBritish ^[^talk] 23:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

Speedy deletion nomination of Stacy Offner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stacy Offner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. aηsuмaη ^༽Ϟ 19:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Einat Ramon, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Jewish Theological Seminary and Sabra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Erica Lippitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Jewish Theological Seminary

Hazzan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Deborah Davis

Laura Geller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Hillel

Marla Rosenfeld Barugel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Jewish Theological Seminary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Felicity Aston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

France3470 (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rita Gross.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 18:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie Goddard Redirect

I could not find any reliable third party sources to establish notability. I made Debbie Goddard her article redirect to Council_for_Secular_Humanism#African_Americans_for_Humanism --Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zelda Kaplan.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 18:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zelda Kaplan

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zelda Kaplan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

author requests deletion of created page at Zelda Kaplan

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A412 (Talk * C) 18:17, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Joy Holtzman.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharlieEchoTango (contact) 00:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Chava Koster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

:- ) DCS 08:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Chava Koster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Academy for Jewish Religion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Betty Robbins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

:- ) DCS 03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Floriane Chinsky.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Elisa Klapheck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pol430 talk to me 10:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Stern Joseph.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 20:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Schechter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wheres T ristan 16:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ordination of women

I have mentioned this to you before when you were using one of your IP addresses, but please stop adding raw links as references. As someone said above "it would be nice if you taught yourself how to make the reference-list look better; "raw links" are somewhat ugly. consider ^[1] instead of just ^[2]" Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 20:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Margaret Wenig, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rcsprinter (chatter) 11:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Alina Treiger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rcsprinter (lecture) 11:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed...

that many of your articles or Articles for Creations have references that have to be re-written to then make them conform to Wikipedia standards. I know you're not a beginner, but please take a look at referencing for beginners - it's full of good helps, especially using the Reference Tool. You've been consistently using bare URLs as references, and bare URLs are prone to link rot, which can create ongoing issues for the verifiability of your editing work.

Shearonink (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 06:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Jalda Rebling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aaron Booth (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martha Neumark.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irma Lindheim.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maya Leibovich.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Valerie Stessin.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schwartz.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sivan Malkin Maas.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! tausif 09:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schonfeld.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! tausif 09:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bea Wyler.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Avitall Gerstetter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aaron Booth (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hazzan Deborah Davis.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sharon Hordes.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pamela Frydman.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ai-jen Poo.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jamietw (talk) 17:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Ai-jen Poo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Drmies (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Transgender in the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sarah (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Kitty Lambert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

:- ) Don 16:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

History of bisexuality in the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Tom Morris (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Helene Ferris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 14:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bernice Sandler

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bernice Sandler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rotorcowboy ^talk
_contribs 18:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Bernice Sandler

Hi Dante8, you recently removed a deletion tag from Bernice Sandler. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, SDPatrolBot, I got this. ;) Rotorcowboy ^talk
_contribs 18:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dante8, if you've cleared up the copyright issue, you might think about submitting this article to Did you know? to have it featured on the Main Page. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bea Wyler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Brunswick and Jewish Theological Seminary

Pamela Frydman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Academy for Jewish Religion

Tannoz Bahremand Foruzanfar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Academy for Jewish Religion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

Hello, Dante8! Just in case you are editing while logged out, let me remind you how grateful other users will be if you do us this little favor and log in on every device you edit Wikipedia from. Thank you. -- ElComandanteChe^ταλκ 20:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Joan Darrah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Lynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michal Rubin

The article Michal Rubin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

She wasn't the first. Is being non first with no other claims of notability an indication she passes WP:N?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 05:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cynthia Culpeper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Theological Seminary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susan Jane Cunningham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vassar and Wellesley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Andrea Bertozzi

Hi, I'm FreeRangeFrog. Dante8, thanks for creating Andrea Bertozzi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider cleaning up the Andrea Bertozzi page, specifically the references section. See WP:REF for more information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dianne Cohler-Esses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Theological Seminary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gay men in American history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilbert Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dianne Cohler-Esses

Hi, I'm Modern.Jewelry.Historian. Dante8, thanks for creating Dianne Cohler-Esses!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The references are very weak, not establishing WP:GNG. I hope there are more to add. The hiring announcements and temple bio are not editorial or substantial. Her own article is not supporting notability either. Please add editorial coverage.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Proposed deletion of Christmas Abbott

The article Christmas Abbott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable subject. Claim given for notability is utterly false - in 2003 a Truck Series team fielded an entirely female pit crew.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christmas Abbott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas Abbott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Abbott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genevieve Behrend, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Secret (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maud Wood Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nineteenth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jane Arthur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Temperance

Margaret Breckinridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Breckinridge

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chhurim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sherpa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy Morris

Hello Dante8,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daisy Morris for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alison Miller

Hello Dante8,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alison Miller for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 17:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nina Beth Cardin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Theological Seminary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alice Goldfinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sherith Israel

Daniella Kolodny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jewish Theological Seminary

Helen Bar-Yaacov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charleston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cecelia Crocker

The article Cecelia Crocker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesnt appear to be particularly notable, survivors rarely are

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 15:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why I made a little revert

Hello there and thanks for your contributions to wikipedia! Just wanted to let you know that I [1] reverted an edit of yours, but I believe that paragraph might be worth being read in the article Women in Judaism. Up to you for putting it there. Thanks for your understanding! Newchildrenofthealmighty (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out and/or WP:Sockpuppeting, and creating articles

Looking at your and this IP's edit histories, and the fact that this IP already knew about the Asexual American history article you'd created very soon after its creation, an article I redirected soon after its creation, it is clear that you are that IP. Unless it's to avoid scrutiny and/or to sockpuppet, I'm not sure why you are intermittently editing as an IP and as Dante8, but you should stop doing that. If it were a case of you being lazy and not wanting to sign in or not having the time to sign in, it would be different. But that is not what you are doing in some of the cases I have seen (from your contributions), like your editing of sexual orientation topics the previous hour. Furthermore, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dante8/Archive, you've been warned to edit only while logged in. Sure, that was three years ago, but I'm sure that you haven't forgotten about that. I'm also suspicious of this editor having suddenly popped up around the same time you did the previous hour, as I suspect that editor (whose Wikipedia contributions are very sporadic) is you as well. You need to read Wikipedia's sockpuppet policy and follow it. You may think that you've been doing nothing wrong by the aforementioned intermittent editing, but that type of editing will get you in trouble at this site.

And when you create a Wikipedia article, make sure that it doesn't have any of the problems that I named the Asexual American history article as having. If you or anyone else recreates that article, I will redirect it again...either because it still has those aforementioned issues and/or because any valid, reliable history about asexuality can be covered in the Asexuality article. There is no reason that such information cannot be covered there, considering that there is currently sparse research on asexuality and therefore the Asexuality article is not big; see WP:SIZE. Flyer22 (talk) 03:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ordination of women (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jewish Theological Seminary and Academy for Jewish Religion

Lia Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jewish Theological Seminary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Farrakhan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop removing the word "college" from the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Louis Farrakhan. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nicki Minaj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The changes to the link are unexplained and targeting the wrong items. Please stop. —C.Fred (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender firsts by year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Montgomery County and Karen Peterson

Little League Baseball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Run and Plate

Diana Nyad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lake Forest

Lesbian American history (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Karen Peterson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 4, 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Women in Judaism. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dante8. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 23:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of LGBT history (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Montgomery County and Allegheny County

Cerys Cooksammy-Parnell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mensa

List of lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender firsts by year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Allegheny County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Joy Holtzman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Joy Holtzman, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Stern Joseph concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Stern Joseph, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schonfeld concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schonfeld, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schwartz concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schwartz, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Schechter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Schechter, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sivan Malkin Maas concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sivan Malkin Maas, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender firsts by year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Darren Young

Timeline of LGBT history (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Darren Young

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ella Little-Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Adam Clayton Powell

March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daisy Bates

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bea Wyler concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bea Wyler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irma Lindheim concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irma Lindheim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hazzan Deborah Davis concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hazzan Deborah Davis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martha Neumark concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martha Neumark, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maya Leibovich concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maya Leibovich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pamela Frydman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pamela Frydman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Valerie Stessin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Valerie Stessin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sharon Hordes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sharon Hordes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of women's firsts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Britain

Lucy Gwynne Branham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lafayette Square

Timeline of women rabbis worldwide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Britain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cerys Cooksammy-Parnell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cerys Cooksammy-Parnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerys Cooksammy-Parnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 02:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mindy Budgor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maasai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Atheist feminism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to A+

History of atheism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to A+

Miss America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vanessa Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edna Fischel Gellhorn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nineteenth Amendment

Janet Annenberg Hooker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blue Room

Religion and sexuality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Welcoming Congregation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greta Christina

Would you happen to have a RS for your edits that is not self-published? Given history, they will probably be removed. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Linda Joy Holtzman

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Linda Joy Holtzman.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Joy Holtzman}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Women in warfare and the military (2000–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Julie Stern Joseph

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Julie Stern Joseph.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Stern Joseph}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 12:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Maya Leibovich

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Maya Leibovich.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maya Leibovich}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Pamela Frydman

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Pamela Frydman.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pamela Frydman}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Julie Schonfeld

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Julie Schonfeld.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schonfeld}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Julie Schwartz

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Julie Schwartz.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julie Schwartz}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Sarah Schechter

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Sarah Schechter.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Schechter}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 03:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Sivan Malkin Maas

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Sivan Malkin Maas.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sivan Malkin Maas}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Hazzan Deborah Davis

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Hazzan Deborah Davis.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hazzan Deborah Davis}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. anamedperson (talk) 10:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists!

Hello Dante8! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Sharon Hordes

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Sharon Hordes.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sharon Hordes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Valerie Stessin

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Valerie Stessin.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Valerie Stessin}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susan Brownmiller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meridian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of women suffrage in America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fourteenth Amendment, Progressive Party and Nineteenth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

Since you obviously know that bare urls shouldn't be used for references (people have asked you to stop doing this numerous times and you even tag your own creations with a bare url cleanup tag) please fix your references. It shouldn't be everyone else's job to clean up messes you willfully create. Helpsome (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of women in education worldwide may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of women in the history of America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Civil Rights Act and Nineteenth Amendment

Timeline of women in warfare from 1940 until 1944 worldwide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Women's Army Auxiliary Corps

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

America

Wikipedia tends to be careful about using America when we mean the United States. Other people in the Western Hemisphere prefer that one country not monopolize the term. Thus:

There are counter examples when a term is deeply rooted, like American literature, but that's more the exception. See American history. The fact that you've named many lists badly is no reason to continue.

Note as well that using the word "history" as you've done when creating a timeline doesn't make sense. All timelines are history by definition. Worst of all is using lingo like second-phase feminism. Only someone already well acquainted with feminism will have any idea what that means. That really isn't a way to help the a Wikipedia user. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide

And why worldwide? Why this:

Timeline of women in warfare from 1940 until 1944 worldwide

Why not this:

Timeline of women in warfare from 1940 until 1944

Aside from using the word "worldwide", which is completely unnecessary, this is not a subject worthy of a timeline. Not by any stretch of the imagination. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 12:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of women in sports in America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kathryn Johnson

Timeline of women in sports worldwide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kathryn Johnson

Timeline of women in warfare from 2000 until the present in America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fort Lee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of women in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mother Earth, Henry Blackwell and Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Your addition to Timeline of women in the United States has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please do not copy and paste text from other webpages. Binksternet (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Plko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Timeline of women in science in the United States has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please do not copy and paste text taken from websites, such as you did with http://web.mit.edu/~invent/iow/leavitt.html. Binksternet (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 28 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of American women's firsts page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Elsie Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lafayette Square

Verna Erikson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to White Guard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello Dante8, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Timeline of feminism in the United States has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Civil Rights Act of 1964 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 13:26, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Women in Israel into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gay men in American history may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

group=note>Andrews v. Vanduzer, [[Supreme Court of New York|N.Y.Sup.]] 1814 (January Term, 1814) (Vanduzer accused Andrews of having had connection with a cow and then a mare and the court
{{Category:LGBT history]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More copyvio at Rollins College

From [2] and [3]. Dougweller (talk) 13:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emily Aviva Kapor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Aviva Kapor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Aviva Kapor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 50.74.152.2 (talk) 23:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The IP never completed the nomination, so there is no discussion currently. However, there could easily be some discussion in the future. —C.Fred (talk) 00:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting citations

Hi,

Thanks for the addition to the Carolee Schneemann article. I thought I'd let you know about a couple of tricks for fomatting citations:

WP:ProveIt - makes creating a citation easy.

A couple of other tools are, specific to the type of citation are:

Refinks for web pages, run after the bare link was added to the article
reftag.appspot.com/ which is used for books found on Google, you just enter the url and press enter and it will create the citation template in a window that can be copied into the article.--20:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance templates

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Kate Millett. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. I've posted a comment on Talk:Kate Millett. CaroleHenson (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Women in warfare and the military (2000–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McHugh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ellis Meredith

Hi, I'm 123chess456. Dante8, thanks for creating Ellis Meredith!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Good start! Very interesting person, please stay on Wikipedia and expand the article in the future!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. 123chess456 (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for copyright violations and lack of communication

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 12:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given your near complete lack of communication, I need an assurance that you understand the copyright policy, will pay attention to this page and respond to the concerns of other editors before allowing you to continue editing. You can show this by following the unblocking instructions above. MER-C 12:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Near complete" lack of communication is right: over 4,000 edits, and a mere 1.2% devoted to communicating with others.[4] Throw in copyright violations, and that's much worse than an editor who merely lives in their own world. Dante8 has been on my watchlist for some time, and they steadfastly refuse to engage fellow editors. It's time not only to say goodbye, but probably to go back and scrutinize their contributions. Doc talk 12:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. MER-C 12:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MER-C and Doc9871, until looking in the edit history of the Gay pride article and spotting Dante8, I, until now, missed that he is now indefinitely blocked, despite the fact that this talk page is on my WP:Watchlist. Per the #Editing while logged out and/or WP:Sockpuppeting, and creating articles section above, I'm glad that he is now indefinitely blocked. Flyer22 (talk) 06:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But also per that aforementioned section above, I'm certain that he is still editing Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 06:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Helen Levinthal".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal

Hello Dante8. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Helen Levinthal".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helen Levinthal}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Felicity Aston has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Dante8. Felicity Aston, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Orapin Chaikarn

Hello Dante8,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Orapin Chaikarn for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Yashovardhan (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinneret Shiryon

The article Kinneret Shiryon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Timeline of women the in history of America" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Timeline of women the in history of America. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Timeline of women the in history of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 05:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dena Feingold

The article Dena Feingold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability per WP:GNG and WP:NOTINHERITED

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Debra Kolodny for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra Kolodny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Kolodny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hyperwave11 (talk) 09:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherry Gong

The article Sherry Gong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The person does not satisfy the Notability criteria for an academic. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)], specifically 2c.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherry Gong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Gong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Gong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] website's name/newsarticle's title

[2] ttp://www.website.com

[1]

[2]