User talk:Gingeksace

This is Gingeksace's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Menotti Lerro (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Menotti Lerro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Menotti Lerro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 08:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gingeksace! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tame (talk) 08:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Menotti Lerro (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Menotti Lerro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Menotti Lerro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 15:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Menotti Lerro (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tamingimpala were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

resubmitting again and again without fixing the problems ain't gonna get this draft accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Menotti Lerro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Menotti Lerro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 06:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Menotti Lerro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Menotti Lerro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tame (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 09:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have not direct link with the author. I just read and wish to support his work because I consider him one of the main one. Have a lovely dayGingeksace (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Menotti Lerro has been accepted

Menotti Lerro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tame (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tame, Thank you a lot for this and for everything!! I wish you a lovely evening. With my best wishes, Gingeksace (talk) 22:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gingeksace, I hope you would not vanish away from contributing more to Wikipedia. Have a wonderful day. -- Tame (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tame, I would be very glad to start new projects soon... Have a wonderful day too.Gingeksace (talk) 15:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Giampiero Neri

The article Giampiero Neri has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Helen(💬📖) 15:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, maybe I did some mistake on creating this article... It was just few minutes I started to create it... Giampiero Neri is a very historical italian poet. Therefore, I would be glad to create his page... Alle the bestGingeksace (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drat is preferred

@Gingeksace, I would recommend you not to create a direct article on the main space, but a draft first and then submit it for AFC like the one before. You can ping me when a draft is done, and I will be happy to check it out and accept it or improve it if needed.-- Tame (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can simply create a draft by putting "Draft:" before the title. For more help, see: WP:DRAFT. Tame (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I will do like that... All the bestGingeksace (talk) 05:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Menotti Lerro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Menotti Lerro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menotti Lerro. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Libero Bigiaretti has been accepted

Libero Bigiaretti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tame (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU!! :) All the best!!Gingeksace (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Corrado Govoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Corrado Govoni. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gingeksace! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot! Have a lovely night!! :) Gingeksace (talk) 23:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC) :[reply]

Draft:Alessandro Serpieri

Hi the draft you created at "Draft:"Alessandro Serpieri has been moved to Draft:Alessandro Serpieri per naming conventions. Thank you for your contributions JW 1961^Talk 12:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you! All the bestGingeksace (talk) 12:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft: Alessandro Serpieri

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft: Alessandro Serpieri a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into "Draft:"Alessandro Serpieri. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Mccapra (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see... Thank you a lot for your indication... Regars, Gingeksace (talk) 13:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your message. Maybe I am doing something wrong... I am not sure. I am using sources and reworking them as recomanded but maybe in my draft it was no yet reworked enough... In addition I took all "selected work" from italian wikipedia and maybe it has generated the report... Anyway, let me know if I can continue. All the best.Gingeksace (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corrado Govoni has been accepted

Corrado Govoni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valerio Magrelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feltrinelli. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alessandro Serpieri

Hello, Gingeksace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alessandro Serpieri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Menotti Lerro into Augusto Orrel: memorie d'orrore e poesia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, thanks for the message... I am not sure about what I copied and paste. (Maybe the ISBN codes?) Please could you help this time with it? I will pay attention to not copy and paste anymore in the future. Best wishes, Gingeksace (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cilento, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prignano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. Maybe it was a mistake, I am not sure... Gingeksace (talk) 10:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it. It is ok now. Thanks! Gingeksace (talk) 10:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Contemporary Center of Arts

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Contemporary Center of Arts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, Gingeksace. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Contemporary Center of Arts has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Menotti Lerro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Menotti Lerro, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menotti Lerro. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Gingeksace. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Menotti Lerro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

While we are appreciative of your efforts and interest in the encyclopedia, it seems clear that you have a conflict of interest WP:COI with Menotti Lerro and his various productions such as these article creations: Ritagli, Il Dottor Faust, Augusto Orrel: memorie d'orrore e poesia, 2084: Il potere dell'immortalità nelle città del dolore, I Battiti della Notte, New Manifesto of Arts, Cultural Pyramid of Cilento, Empathism, Donna Giovanna, l'ingannatrice di Salerno, Cilento Poetry Prize. Wikipedia should never be used for promotion or advertising.

There are also issues with the photos you have added to these articles, How is it that you have taken so many photographs of him, his work and his events going back to at least 2015 if you are an unconnected editor as you state on my talk page? The photos are uploaded as your "own work". How did you get licensing permission to upload his copyrighted artworks? You have also uploaded numerous newspaper articles as your own work which is a copyright violation. Could you please explain? Many thanks! Netherzone (talk) 16:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand what you say... Indeed I asked the author by e-mail to use his pictures as my own work and he agreed.

I think, indeed, the opera of this author earned to be on wikipedia: so many books apprecited critically (there are monographs about him in both Italy and in UK), prizes, relevant critics writing of him on relevant magazines. International successs too.

I think we should concentrate on that and help an author that seems making a honest and strong carrier earning a position. There are two degrees, a Master of Arts and a PHD too all in literature. And teaching for years at university. Please, if I may ask, do not focus so much attention on this aspect of "own work pictures..." tHis author has so many things to say...

With very best wishes. 16:40, 8 August 2022 Gingeksace (talk) 16:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About all creations you metions: I just inserted one by one thinking it was nice to give a complete work of an author. As always I thought that if there were not enough reference and reasons to be there, someone would have been contested and deleted that.

I Think I worked in good faith trying just to focus my attention on this author more than others (by the way I written many articles on old or death poets too... Gingeksace (talk) 16:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...about newspaper violetion: I am sorry: I thought that scannering an article made it automatically become the same article as "my own work". I had not interest to violate copyright... I am not just enough expert of all these things... I am sincerely sorry for it... It is so bad to be accused to violate copyright.... Anyway, I am learning so many things... Thanks!

Best wishes Gingeksace (talk) 17:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not disputing that you acted in good faith, and realize that Italian WP may have different rules and guidelines, and you may not have known that. If you are unsure about something, ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:HELPDESK. Regarding the photos on Commons, you can ask at their Helpdesk, since they are a separate entity from WP. In the meantime, please do follow the English Wikipedia guidelines regarding declaring your Conflict of Interest. Thank you, Netherzone (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Thank you!

Regards Gingeksace (talk) 17:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to add that maybe through my enthusiasm, but lack of knowledge of the rules, I've made something of a mess. Sorry!! Gingeksace (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since 2015, you have had a conflict of interest with Menotti Lerro and all of his associated pages listed above. Do not remove COI tags on articles with which you have a conflict of interest. You must declare your COI on your user page. You need to stop directly editing pages with which you have a COI and start using the Edit Request Feature. It seems you have not bothered to read our guidelines on conflict of interest - read them at this link WP:COI, and if there is anything you do not understand see this link on Plain and Simple Conflict of Interest Guide WP:PSCOI. Editors who do not comply with our policies and guidelines risk losing their editing privileges. I will be replacing the COI tags, as these articles are very promotional which is against one of our key policies WP:PROMO. Netherzone (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, if a ask, but I really do not understand what is promotional in this article...

It is an italian excellence for literature who wrote 40 books and they are just listed. What is promotional? indeed I do not understand it... Gingeksace (talk) 17:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition I did not removed tag for Menotti LErro article, it was removed from someone else... declining the request of speedy deletion. I think all this is a bit rude to me... Gingeksace (talk) 17:43, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Menotti Lerro article was created as a draft and it was accepted. After it has been improved with help of some experts of wikipedia. I do not see what is promotional here...

SOrry if I am frank... but It is not nice to talk of promotional in this case I think... Gingeksace (talk) 17:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not write anything promotional therefore I do not accept you talk and put tags like this to me.

Menotti Lerro is one of the most relevant italian author from years and there are monographs sayoing this. So, I do not understand why you look so strongly convinced he dosn't earn the right to be on wikipedia. I see very week profiles in the fild of literature on wikipedia but you did not notice those. The worst one for you is Menotti LErro (both as author and as article?) Gingeksace (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

However, ok, I do not write anything else... because I ereally do not understand...

Thank you and sorry if I am unable to understand where the real problem is... but it is my foulf of course. Gingeksace (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, we all know that very very often behind an article of a living author there are some conflict, some direct influence... It is often evident that article are written from the same authors (and it can be good in some way, because they know the rreal biography). I think the real important thing should be is there are not the requirements to be enciclopedic or not.

Lets try to be a bit more flexible if possible... Gingeksace (talk) 18:05, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please address the COI issues.

Have you read and do you understand WP:COI?
Did you remove COI tags on articles related to Menotti Lerro and his projects?
Have you disclosed your COI on your user page?

Netherzone (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The poit is I am not promoting anything. I am creating honest beautiful pages of good literature. I see you write of arts and poetry too. You should understand these things.

As I have explained I just asked the author to use as mu own work some pictures and he agreed. Can you prove I have a COI? Gingeksace (talk) 18:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you to remove yourself all these tags you put and help to polish the pages. Menotti Lerro creeated the most important movement in contemporary age Empathism give an hand to improve it, not try to delete it. Thanks a lot. All the best Gingeksace (talk) 18:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to underline I just made a section to explain I have contacted my subject Menotti Lerro to ask to use his pictures. Gingeksace (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ritagli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ritagli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The sourcing on this article consists of non-independent sources, calendar listings, press releases. Does not support notability.Netherzone (talk) 21:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Battiti della notte I am afraid... :-) Gingeksace (talk) 02:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Battiti della Notte moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, I Battiti della Notte, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The sources are not independent, they consist of press releases, calendar listings, blog or do not mention him at all. Netherzone (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand...I thought that sources were more important... but they actually are not...

I am now understanding more of what can be important for an article to be relevant...

Thanks to give me the opportunity to improve it. BUt I don't see around other better sources for it...

Non è tutto oro quello che luce! (did you know this Italian saying?) ;-) Gingeksace (talk) 02:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gingeksace, it is the quality of the sources, not the quantity that is important. And also the sources must demonstrate in-depth significant coverage, not just a mention or a listing. Lastly sources should be independent of the subject, not connected to the subject or sponsoring the subject.

I think I get the saying! Fool's gold may sparkle and attract the eye, but is not real gold....and therefore does not have the same value.

To my way of thinking, a good approach to these two articles would be to merge the content into the Menotti Lerro article, and then have these two deleted. But that is just my opinion, it would involve a discussion with other editors. What do you think about that? Netherzone (talk) 04:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot! Indeed you got the saying and I like the English version you gave too... :)) I think I agree with your opinion about the possibility to merge the content into the Menotti Lerro article and delete these two... Gingeksace (talk) 04:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gingeksace, I'm glad that you think you agree with this plan, since the two shorter articles duplicate content and are mainly sourced to primary, connected sources. For example, the Draft:Ritagli article has the same content as the Menotti Lerro article except for the mention of the permanent aspect of the series of visual poems. So what I can do is add the permanent display information, and an independent reliable source to Lerro. Then the draft can be deleted or left to expire in draft space. This will improve the Lerro article and will start to resolve the WP:WALLEDGARDEN. We can go thru the other articles one by one as we find the time, and we can discuss the changes as we go.

I want you to know that I've never disputed Lerro's notability, only the promotional tone of that article (which can be fixed in the future, and I will explain in detail at that time why certain things are promo.)

The other related articles (the WP:WALLEDGARDEN of associated articles) are content forks and are unnecessary. See more info here WP:CONTENTFORK. For example, Cultural Pyramid of Cilento, Empathism and New Manifesto of Arts are very closely related, repeat the same content and don't need to be separate articles. They can all be folded into the Lerro article, or into the Empathism article. Again, the primary, non-independent sources and trivial mentions like event listings and press releases should be removed so that the sourcing consists of independent reliable sources only - the type that belongs in an encyclopedia. "Consolidate and improve" can guide the way.

Does this make sense to you? If not please respond so we can continue to discuss and clarify. Best wishes, Netherzone (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Netherzone,

Thank you a lot for your explanations and suggestions: I think you are perfectly right about the way to follow and I will glad to assist at this process.

Maybe I would leave, as you also suggest, as main articles of reference the Menotti Lerro's one and the Empathism one and merge into them the Pyramid and Manifesto articles (maybe better using the method of the draft leaving them expire...).

Thank you a lot for all this.

With my best regards. Gingeksace (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those two articles Menotti Lerro and Empathism seem like the two most important and notable ones of the group. Thank you for working together with me. I'll continue to work on cleaning things up as I find the time. If there are any questions I will reach out, and please do not hesitate to reach out to me as well. Netherzone (talk) 00:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It will give also more compactness at the main articles. It is nice to work together and to learn so many things, thanks!

I will be ready, in case, to ask or make observations... Gingeksace (talk) 00:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Former accounts and/or other user names

Have you ever edited Wikipedia, English or Italian version, using another user name or had a former account(s)? Netherzone (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about New Manifesto of Arts

Hello, Gingeksace, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sideswipe9th, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, New Manifesto of Arts, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Manifesto of Arts.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sideswipe9th}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know. In my opinion this article is about an important, innovative and niche topic. I think it worth to keep it and wait for possible relevant developments. But of course I will accept your decision. Best wishes. Gingeksace (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ritagli

Hello, Gingeksace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ritagli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:I Battiti della Notte

Hello, Gingeksace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I Battiti della Notte, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ritagli

Hello, Gingeksace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ritagli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:I Battiti della Notte

Hello, Gingeksace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "I Battiti della Notte".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giampiero Neri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Domenico Giordano

Hello, Gingeksace,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Wolverine XI, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Domenico Giordano, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wolverine XI}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 10:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wolverine, thank you a lot for your kindness. Please, if possible, give me a bit of time to work on that. In did not remeber I left it so short...

With all my best wishes Gingeksace (talk) 13:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from it:Alberto_Bertoni to Alberto Bertoni. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot. Maybe I just did not think I should edite the list of books... But looking now at that I understand I had too...

I will do it... Thank you!! Gingeksace (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marius Chelaru (writer)

The article Marius Chelaru (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks independent sources attesting notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for this. I wanted to let you know I have been working on the article and I think it has got a good level now. Please, if possible, help it to improve more... Best wishes. Gingeksace (talk) 15:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marius Chelaru (writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marius Chelaru (writer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marius Chelaru (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tomasz Krezymon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomasz Krezymon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomasz Krezymon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Gingeksace. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gingeksace. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gingeksace|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. You admittedly have a Conflict of Interest with Menotti Lerro, his Empathism "movement", his so-called prize award, publications, plays and his many works. You have been warned several times already, yet you have continued to create new articles on Empathism, most recently a flood of new articles on his non-notable colleagues who have "declared" their allegiance to Lerro's Empathism. This is over-the top promotion, which is ironic since Lerro's article was deleted, according to an administrator, due to lack of notability. I am wondering if you are being truthful in stating that the only COI you have with Lerro and his arena was asking him for photos. Are you also being paid to produce this promotional content? Netherzone (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Netherzone, thank you for your message. I will answer to you in all frankness and honesty. I read you wrote the Cilento International Poetry Prize is given from Lerro to people of his movement. Sorry, but it is not correct! First thing the adherents to the Movement are around 200... (see the volume The Empathic Movement (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2023); Moreover, if you look better at this you will notice that "Cilento Prize" was founded in 2017, therefore 3 years before the Movement arose... It means that authors (very relevant authors since the begininnig of a prize made in a little village of south of Italy...) just chose later to adher to his movemet... after they already got the prize... In addition, that prize is financed by Italian Ministry of Culture for 140.000 Euro (I do not think they gave so much money at a not serious, just for friends and not very professional Prize...). Second thing: Lerro created a pretty relevant Movement (it does not happen every year, therefore, after so much work in years working honestly for literature and for culture (in particular of his poor land) I liked to put his work on the wikipedia because I thought and think he earned to be here as many critics have written and as all adherents demostrate...). I have studies this author (there are monographies about him...) and he spent all his life and intelligence and talent to create literature. Other people in the World became maybe rich to work all their lives to make money when they have a talent to use, he just choose to spend his talent on writing... I know he is still very poor and it is probably also because his wish to be in the field of poetry that is not really giving money or great popolarity (and I heard he is also very sick) and his richness is just in all literature he created since he was young cominig for a little village and very poor family... So please, with my heart, do not go too far with your thouths, be kind and consider I am not cheating anyone... and, no, I am not getting payied by any one. This author has been unlucky all his life. Never helped (in Italy there is so much corruption and for talented authors without recomandetion life is often too hard...), but still he was able to do well even in very difficul conditions... I hope you can one day get a bit involved with him and apreciate a bit his work and maybe him as a good, honest writer and scholar and person... With all my best wishes for you. Gingeksace (talk) 22:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, but I am no longer able to believe what you say or give you the benefit of the doubt that you do not have a conflict of interest with Menotti Lerro, Empathism and the other associated articles promoting these. Netherzone (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angelo Casciello for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angelo Casciello is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Casciello until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elvio Annese for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elvio Annese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvio Annese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 01:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giancarlo Turaccio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giancarlo Turaccio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giancarlo Turaccio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 00:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for letting me know. Frankly, I am a bit surprised about your vision (even after I tried to explain a bit myself...). However, I will try to explain it better than I did in the past. I start from the Cilento International Poetry Prize: I read that many times you wrote that it is a Prize that Lerro gives to people to make them to adher to the Movement. As I have already told you, the Prize was born 2017 while the Movement was born 2020, therefore it means two things: first, that important authors accepted the prize before of the movement existence, and second that they have chose to adher to the Movement in a next moment (did you consider for a moment that maybe great authors, included a Nobel Prize for literature, are trusting this movement and wanted to be part of it? I do not think Menotti Lerro was so able to corrupt even all of them to promote himself and his movement...). Still, the Prize has been financed by Italian Ministry of Culture for 140.000 Euro (it happened in the last two years because they liked and trusted this Prize and the same Movement, which is part of the artistical project). Moreover, I wish to tell you I was creating these profiles starting from the list included in the ACCADEMIC VOLUME "The Empathic Movement, Cambridge Scholars 2023 and paperback 2024" published in UK of adherents to the Movement: I DID NOT do it to promote people and the movement in a malicious way, but I was thinking, in good faith, they were encyclopedic profiles, therefore I thought it would have been nice to create the lovely ferment which is involving so many important people both in Italy and abroud... (please look things from another point of view: a beautiful, new Movement is born and 200 and more good artist and scholars and people of culture wanted to be part of it... and now, after all this is already "living" in volumes and articals, I thought It was nice to put it also on Wikipedia! The thing that you say that "someone adhering a Movement cannot talk of the same Movement or of his founder", is a bit unconfortable to answer for me: high literary cultured world is connected (thanks to God) therefore it is normal in this field they talk to each other and adher to a Movement of one of them if they respect him. But it is not a limit, or a cheating thing, it is just genuine relations and collaborations among artists, critics, poets, scholars, academics, ecc... they like the work of someone else in the same field or related field and want to talk, write criticism and sometimes adhere to a new movement... Critics such Alessandro Serpieri (writer), Francesco D'Episcopo, Roberto Carifi, Maurizio Cucchi, Giorgio Barberi Squarotti and many others have not been teachers of Menotti Lerro but just in the years they appreciated him, wrote of him and finally wanted to be in his Movement (what is wrong with this?) (and what is wrong if also his own old academic professors trust him so much to adher to his movement?) all this is just a merit, I think, not a bad thing. IN ADDITION: Please, do not quote only local articals: Lerro has been mentioned on many national and international articles such as Corriere della Sera, Il Mattino, Il Sole 24 Ore, The New Arab, "Gradiva" Magazine, "Poesia" Magazine, Nuovi Argomenti Magazine. I understand that something as this movement does not happen often... But can you just for a moment consider that a pretty interesting new Movement arose in 2020, from Italy, going on in a more or less fast way towards the World (it happened after so many decades that something like this did not happen... and never in the past something similar happened starting from the South of Italy...). Lerro is not a powerful, rich person who could be so able to influence so many important authors just to "cheat" academic publishers and now Wikipedia... It seems just a relevant, new, beautiful situation spreading good feelings and literature and art in the World... (therefore i thought that also, and in particular, it should have be on Wikipedia as the amazing expression of "free encyclopedia" to welcome new pretty important, and maybe very relevant things.) In the Movement there are also young artists and cultured, passionate people and maybe ONE, TWO or THREE OF THEM WANTED TO MAKE THIS EFFORT to tell to the world also through Wikipedia the beauty that all of them, starting from the founder - which has 4 academic titles (included MA in Uk and Phd) and studied and taught or was visiting around ten different universities, and wrote 40 creative fiction and no fiction volumes - are creating! You, maybe, should help all of it and be pleased to help to put it on Wikipedia... Do you think that good authors could exist just in the past? Maybe Lerro is one that is working pretty well nowadays... cannot be? (would you so surprised for instance if a Nobel Prize was creating this Movement?). Well, Lerro is not a Nobel Prize but it does not mean he cannot create a notable movement or being a good author the same... I think. In conclusion, dear Netherzone, I ask you to not go too far with your thoughts and ideas about what is going on. All of this is extremely clean, and fruit of deep work and passion. Please look things from another point of view and, if you can, I ask you even to help to improve some of the profiles have been created. Maybe not all of them are encyclopedic (sorry if I thought so) but many are at 100%, starting with the Nobel adhered to the movement who DID NOT receive the "Cilento Prize", while the Nobel Prize for literature 2023 got this year the "Cilento Prize" and I see he did not adhere to the Movement... (so as you can see, maybe things are not really as you are thinking. I hope you can change your mind and, as I said, even help a bit if you like...). Thank you a lot to give me the opportunity to explain a bit better everything. With very best wishes. Gingeksace (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dear, but the problem is not that I don't have an open mind or heart, I do. The problem is that you have a conflict of interest and are using WP as a venue for promotion. Netherzone (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point and how it could seems, but really It was not the propose in my mind, but only thought It was nice to put it here in this way... (no promotional intended. It would be promotional for me if for instance it was done 4 years ago... but now I think it is just telling what is going on...). Of course nor been expert in the rouls I can do mistakes. But in totally good faith. Have a nice day. Cheers. Gingeksace (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna Bianchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Bianchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Bianchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Menotti Lerro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Menotti Lerro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menotti Lerro (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cilento International Poetry Prize for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cilento International Poetry Prize is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cilento International Poetry Prize until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gingeksace. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 16:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carmelo Strano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carmelo Strano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmelo Strano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 03:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vincenzo Missanelli moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vincenzo Missanelli. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aldo Castellano moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aldo Castellano. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ezio Guaitamacchi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ezio Guaitamacchi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luigi Rossi (scholar) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Luigi Rossi (scholar). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edoardo Landi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Edoardo Landi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giancarlo Pontiggia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Giancarlo Pontiggia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lino Vairetti moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lino Vairetti. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vincenzo Guarracino moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vincenzo Guarracino. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Quasimodo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alessandro Quasimodo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Baudinelli (artist) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Marco Baudinelli (artist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tomaso Kemeny moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tomaso Kemeny. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antonello Pelliccia

The article Antonello Pelliccia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure promotion for “Empathism”.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 18:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You keep risking legal actions against yourself (and one day you will get it) to use your brain in this silly way... You should learn to respect people and do not lie to get deletions and to not use wikipedia as a game to get some satisfactions that probably you do not have in real life... Try to grow up, man! You are ridiculous! Gingeksace (talk) 19:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) Gingeksace (talk) 20:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Star Mississippi 20:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]