User talk:HealthKnight1993
HealthKnight1993, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi HealthKnight1993! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Californios
- added a link pointing to European
- Hispanos of New Mexico
- added a link pointing to European
- Tejanos
- added a link pointing to Tejas
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shopping center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Pseudoscience and numerology
[edit]Hello and thanks for your additions to number articles. Do you have sources you can cite to help readers learn more about these? For pseudoscience, it's usually better to add references from mainstream media rather than from the numerologists themselves. Certes (talk) 08:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tory, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican Party and Nativism.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japanese honorifics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Japanese honorifics, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 1950 FIFA World Cup
- added a link pointing to Paraná
- 1978 FIFA World Cup
- added a link pointing to Córdoba Province
- 2014 FIFA World Cup
- added a link pointing to Paraná
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Toronto FC, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of religious titles and styles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patriarch of Jerusalem.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polo Grounds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Soccer League.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you recently removed content from Normandy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TylerBurden (talk) 00:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Sanskrit/Prakrit
[edit]I have reverted your edits on Sylheti language, Bengali language and Assamese language. Please note that these languages did not come from Sanskrit but Prakrit, though their standard forms have Sanskrit influences. Chaipau (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not revert these, as you have done. You have cited no reference to show that the Middle-Indo-Aryan (Prakrits etc.) are derived from Vedic Sanskrit. Also, please look at Oberlies (2003)
.MIA languages are not younger than (‘Classical’) Sanskrit. And a number of their morpho-phonological and lexical features betray the fact that they are not direct continuations of Rgvedic Sanskrit, the main base of ‘Classical’ Sanskrit; rather they descend from dialects which, despite many similarities, were different from and in some regards even more archaic.
- So you have linguists claiming just the opposite of what you are claiming. Pinging Fylindfotberserk for visibility.
- Chaipau (talk) 00:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Chaipau. HealthKnight1993 needs to support their changes with WP:RS sources. Since these pertain to WP:LANG, I'd suggest HealthKnight1993 to visit that project as well as go through its policies and if necessary discuss there since we are talking about multiple languages. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Euro English
- added a link pointing to Independent
- Languages of the European Union
- added a link pointing to Independent
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of predecessors of sovereign states in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knez.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Lists of monarchs
[edit]I undid your changes at three "Lists of <CountryName> monarchs" articles, because they were not an improvement, they added unhelpful material into table cells about European monarchs through history, resulting in making the whole table longer, without any benefit to the reader, and because they were unsourced. If you disagree, please open a discussion at the Talk page of one of the articles. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
The edit summary field
[edit] Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 08:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced edits
[edit]I've removed your unsourced edits at List of predecessors of sovereign states in Asia and List of predecessors of sovereign states in Europe. In the latter case, you added 3 kb of unsourced content in these 7 edits, none of which included a citation to a reliable source. Please have another look at Wikipedia's Verifiability policy, and please add citations as you add new content to articles. Beyond that, none of them contained an edit summary; please see the previous section.
In a much more minor issue, in these three edits you introduced disambiguation links into the article, where you probably didn't intend to. Please see WP:Disambiguation. More serious, is the sourcing issue, and it's important that you understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines about verifiability, and adhere to them. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me at my Talk page, or feel free to ask questions at the Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- I just reverted three more edits of yours at List of predecessors of sovereign states in Europe, so you just carried right on making edits after that? Are you reading these messages on your Talk page? The problem at that article was more serious than I thought, and I have rolled it back to the last good edit of 28 July, reversing several dozen of your edits, with 15kb of unsourced content. Please do not add any more unsourced content to this article, or to any other article at Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy, and follow its recommendations on the use of citations. See Help:Footnotes for more details. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 07:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Undiscussed page move undone
[edit]Your move of Royal families of the United Arab Emirates has been undone by another editor, restoring it to its original title. Please do not perform any other page moves (other than fixing misspellings or obvious title errors) without discussing the move first on the talk page of the article. See WP:RM#CM about how to nominate a single article for a new name, and follow the procedure there. (In this case, your proposed new name was almost guaranteed to fail in a move discussion for reasons of WP:COMMONNAME, as there are only two occurrences of it to be found on the internet (in non-wiki sources) compared to around 14,000 of the current name.) If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at my Talk page, or you can ask any question about editing Wikipedia at the WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please self-revert. The list is based on scholary consensus. Russian tsars aren't included in such lists in scientific literature. Marcelus (talk) 21:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Formation date of England
[edit]Your recent edits to the List of sovereign states by date of formation caught mt eye. I'm USian, and my knowledge of English history is scant, but your edits look like original research to me, and see WP:NOR.
I took a look at England § Middle Ages and at the England in the Middle Ages article, looking for confirming content and supporting cites, and found neither. It seems to me that those recent edits ought to be removed for now and possibly reintroduced, citing support, into one or both of those other articles before being mentioned in Summary Style in the article where you've been inserting them. Please respond, either here or on the article talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I was tired when I was editing and ended up writing wrong information when I was done. Thanks to you I went to check what was written wrong and... I noticed that I wrote that Wessex conquered the other kingdoms with wars, when in fact the English kings had sworn an oath of loyalty to the first English king of a unified England. I would have checked later. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- You seem to have added that info to the article (like your other edits, without an explanatory edit summary) in this edit I still feel that most of this info ought to bi in appropriate detail articles, per the WP:SS guideline, and ought to cite supporting sources (per WP:V) there. Without consensus to the contrary on the article talk page, I'll probably revert your edits as WP:OR after announcing intention to do so there. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monarch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Israel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
"Turkey" vs. "Türkiye"
[edit]Hi! I saw you used the name "Türkiye" as the name of the country generally known in English as "Turkey" in your recent edit.
Q: Why don't you use the name Türkiye, the correct name for this country?
A: Because the English-language Wikipedia has a WP:COMMONNAME policy. We use names for countries and places that are the names commonly used for them in English, regardless of what official organizations use. Technically, this kind of name is known as an exonym. For example, we use the name Germany, instead of the native endonym Deutschland.
If or when that general English-language usage changes (as has happened in the past with place names such as Mumbai and Beijing), the same WP:COMMONNAME policy implies that the English-language Wikipedia will necessarily also follow suit. So far, that hasn't happened.
This has been discussed many times, with the same result every time because of the common name policy. If you'd like to discuss this further, please take it up at Talk:Turkey. However, for the reasons given above, there is currently a moratorium on further requests for name changes to the Turkey article until 1 December 2023. — The Anome (talk) 13:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
"The Spanish Renunciation"
[edit]Hi,
In an edit you made in July to "List of French monarchs", you added the phrase "because of the Spanish renunciation", with a link to "Philip V of Spain". I was about to delete the same phrase from the article on Louis Philippe I (added here in 2022), but I did a bit of searching first to see whether I could make sense of it, and found your edit. Could you explain what it means? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- It means that the descendants of Philip V of Spain renounced the right to one day assume the throne of France in the Peace of Utrecht HealthKnight1993 (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. So to put it another way, Louis Philippe succeeded Charles X after the July Revolution because Philip V's descendants were ineligible as a result of the Peace of Utrecht. The way the sentence is constructed made me think that Charles X was forced to abdicate because of the July Revolution and the Peace of Utrecht, which made no sense. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of characters in the Family Guy franchise, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit] Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 15:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the warning HealthKnight1993 (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of dynasties, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Mediawiki-button-preview.png/760px-Mediawiki-button-preview.png)
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Douglas Santana (talk • contribs) 21:52, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Valeu pela dica compatriota. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please don't add anymore surnames to articles on nobles unless you can provide reliable sources confirming the surname. This can be a contentious topic, e.g. Talk:Charles III/Archive 11#Surname and has been so for a long time, e.g. Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf/Archive 1#Bernadotte. DrKay (talk) 07:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok... I admit that I was not aware of this debate here on English Wikipedia. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm having to waste a lot of time reverting your spurious addition of "surnames" to various royal articles. It's completely unsourced and disruptive. Maria Theresa's surname was not "von Österreich". That forms no partof her name. She was a member of the House of Habsburg so if anything that would be her name but these people don't have "surnames" in the way that you seem to think. "von Österreich" is never a surname. this applies to numerous other territorial designations that you have misunderstood as part of their name. Can you revert what you've been doing please. You've made this mistake in dozens of articles - you need to clean up this mess. DeCausa (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Explain to me why the nobility in Europe don't have surnames... and it's something that I (who grew up in a republic) don't understand. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 22:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, first you provide a source for Maria Theresa's surname being "von Österreich". You can't just insert nonsense, garbage in hundreds of articles and say "prove me wrong". See WP:V. This is basic Wikipedia policy. DeCausa (talk) 23:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not angry... it was a genuine question. I'm reversing the edits. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 23:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Maria Theresa, as an example, was a member of the House of Habsburg. If she had a surname it would be von Habsburg if anything. Her modern descendants, who live in Republics, have adopted that (or a version of it) as a surname. "Of Austria" is a territorial designation i.e. signifying she was of the ruling house that came from there. No one has ever called it a surname. Most royal families are treated, traditionally, as not having a surname. It's a convention. But there's debate over that on a case by case basis. It's a complicated topic. DeCausa (talk) 23:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok... I think I understand now ... HealthKnight1993 (talk) 23:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Maria Theresa, as an example, was a member of the House of Habsburg. If she had a surname it would be von Habsburg if anything. Her modern descendants, who live in Republics, have adopted that (or a version of it) as a surname. "Of Austria" is a territorial designation i.e. signifying she was of the ruling house that came from there. No one has ever called it a surname. Most royal families are treated, traditionally, as not having a surname. It's a convention. But there's debate over that on a case by case basis. It's a complicated topic. DeCausa (talk) 23:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not angry... it was a genuine question. I'm reversing the edits. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 23:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, first you provide a source for Maria Theresa's surname being "von Österreich". You can't just insert nonsense, garbage in hundreds of articles and say "prove me wrong". See WP:V. This is basic Wikipedia policy. DeCausa (talk) 23:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Explain to me why the nobility in Europe don't have surnames... and it's something that I (who grew up in a republic) don't understand. HealthKnight1993 (talk) 22:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm having to waste a lot of time reverting your spurious addition of "surnames" to various royal articles. It's completely unsourced and disruptive. Maria Theresa's surname was not "von Österreich". That forms no partof her name. She was a member of the House of Habsburg so if anything that would be her name but these people don't have "surnames" in the way that you seem to think. "von Österreich" is never a surname. this applies to numerous other territorial designations that you have misunderstood as part of their name. Can you revert what you've been doing please. You've made this mistake in dozens of articles - you need to clean up this mess. DeCausa (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)