User talk:Jim1138/Archive 50

Archive 45

←

Archive 48

Archive 49

Archive 50

Archive 51

Archive 52

→

Archive 55

Corrections

Hello admin. I only correcting the dxag article. Take a look at its callsign meaning it says in the article is RR, but its callsign is dxAG. Its ag not RR. My point is, some parts of the dxAG page is copied only from dwrr-fm. Hope you understand. I don't vandalized. Im only correcting the incorrect parts of the dxag page. THANKS ADMIN.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.190.55.164 (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Seth Riggs wrong info in his bio.

Hi Jim, I just left information explaining why the above mentioned summary of my dads info is incorrect. Can you please call me at the number i left you in the last message? This is truly embarassing.

Kathleen Riggs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.72.76 (talk) 06:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

You do realize I have no way of verifying your identity. For all I know, the reverse could be true. A phone call won't resolve this. I did a photo search and that appears to be a photo of a Seth Riggs. Your best bet might be to first get an wp:account (which helps greatly with communication) and then find wp:reliable sources (not wp:selfpublished sources) that support your points. You can start a wp:RfC on talk:Seth Riggs or a wp:BLPN to get this cleared up. See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Hope this helps Jim1138 (talk) 06:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

whats the problem with you/...

I am restoring it to previous version and you keep reverting changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahildalal (talk • contribs) 08:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

28 May 2017

Hello, I'm enTerbury. I noticed that you removed a change I made to an article, Think Think and Ah Tsai, because I didn't provide a source. I’ve conveniently added one for now, but if you’d like to do it more wikipedia-professionally, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! EnTerbury (talk) 08:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Young Stunna (musician)

Thanks for the info Jim The article has been elected for speedy deletion due to similarities between it and a previous article But the article was published with respect to the bio of an artist There has to be similarities mainly because the artist wouldn't want any detail about himself to be left out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexchuqs (talk • contribs) 08:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Rexchuqs: The only obligation we have to the artist is covered at WP:BLP, which doesn't say anything about what the article subject wants. If you are working with or for him (given that you seem to know what he supposedly wants), you need to read WP:Paid-contribution disclosure and WP:Conflict of interest. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138 what can i do to avoid deletion of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexchuqs (talk • contribs) 09:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Rexchuqs: I would suggest you ask at the wp:help desk I'm not really sure. You could run it through the wp:article for creation process. Also, you could move it to your sandbox or perhaps user:Rexchugs/Young Stunna (musician) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138 Has the article Young Stunna (musician) been deleted? I can't find it.!!!!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexchuqs (talk • contribs) 15:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Wrong Edits

Mohun Bagan Ac Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohun_Bagan_A.C. and Kolkata Derby Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolkata_Derby

is going through wrong edits. The page is frequently been updated with incorrect records of Kolkata Derby and Also Mohun Bagan is being referred as National Club of India which is totally Incorrect following are the National Elements of India there is no other national elements

and the correct derby statistics and the result of first derby between East Bengal and Mohun Bagan is stated clearly in the following sites including the Fifa website and i-league org website, the official football site of India

Dasgupta.rony (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

References

Royal Guernsey Light Infantry

Hi Jim. Just to let you know that I've filed a dispute re the Royal Guernsey Light Infantry edit war. Your input would be welcome. Please check out the noticeboard.

Borgia

Please read the section of Lucrezia's early life. I only edited the entry this way to draw the attention of an admin. Dave McDave?

The Wanderer

Hi, Jim1138, My name is 71.166.103.152 and thanks for notice I made a mistake on the article, The Wanderer today. I also appreciated that you didn't mind I can re-edit the article. Sorry if this message is very short. Thanks again for reading and have a good day.

as after long work and research

plz restore the page ali khel orakzai agency page as i have research a lots and made that data collect and you have remove it please restor back

@Jim1138:

hi Jim I am really sorry I am no good at this level of technical stuff. My Old agent put this stuff about me up here but I dont want it.

The agent is dead now - Ihow do I send Dianaa a message from her page

Thanks so much for you help!

Vanilla57

Honda in Formula One

Hi,

I removed a line from the end of this paragraph (as an engine supplier) which you have subsequently cancelled out claiming it was not constructive. There is no relevance about Indy car racing in a Formula 1 article. It is blatant brand tarnishing. Please accept the revision.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.46.195 (talk) 06:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Hypocrisy

On my talk page, you wrote : "Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me."

but you delete what I write here. Clap clap

@Mepis123: Stop wasting peoples' time. Jim1138 (talk) 07:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

About removal of content in God saraswat brahmn page

Hi jim ,I have read that source yesteraday.The user had copied line to line ditto from the authors book without any self editing.Hope you know the violation of rule in this case. Panjikar (talk) 07:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Panjikar (talk) 07:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

@Panjikar: I noted that you again removed it with an wp:edit summary explaining why. The policy would be wp:copyright violations! Thank you for using an ES! Thanks for the note and my apology for undoing your edit. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

No problem Jim I am really concerned with edits that these people are doing don't know how can they void the rules.Sad to see wiki in this stage after 4 year.:(.My original account is also not getting opened...huh...By the don't forget to remove that content. Regards, Panjikar (talk) 07:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

@Panjikar: I wish that Wikimedia would require everyone to register. That would solve a lot of problems. All I pretty much do is wp:RCP... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Ya Jim you are right,Jim I forgot by the way I don't have reverting power now.lol.please if u don't mind can you revert by yourself(Don't forget to give explaination )...I should start from scratch now ...:(. Panjikar (talk) 07:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Servus

Hey. Can you speak german? I changed some false information (Martin Sellner). --Benqo (talk) 22:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

I attached explanation in 'Megalia'

Sorry for my inexperienced in wikipedia rules. the picture that I attached is the first sexism writing in DC-Mers Gallery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.132.5.148 (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

In Re: Malcolm Kirk

I'm surprised you don't think the edit was constructive, Jim1138.

Previously, and now once again, the name Greg Valentine in the lede is wikilinked to the article about the American wrestler who uses that ring name, real name Jonathan Anthony Wisniski. However, the "Greg Valentine" partnered with Big Daddy (Shirley Crabtree) for the bout in which Malcolm Kirk died was not Wisniski, but Shirley's nephew Steve who wrestled under the name "Greg Valentine" in tribute to Wisniski, and who does not have his own article. This is all made clear in Shirley Crabtree's article.

The wikilink is clearly erroneous, but merely delinking it would likely lead to someone ignorant of the above restoring the link, hence my added explanation.

Incidentally, I have been a regular editor for over 10 years, most often on the Ref Desks, but also in articles when I happen to spot errors or poor wording etc. (I am an ex-professional copy editor). I consciously choose not to open a Wikipedia account, and have a dynamic IP because the ISP (Sky.com) that took over my previous static-IP ISP several years ago only provides dynamic IPs. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.9.8.213 (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Merger of Lake Mykee Town, Missouri into Holts Summit, Missouri

On the claim of not making a constructive edit, you reverted a good faith edit about Lake Mykee who has merged into Holts Summit and is no longer known as Lake Mykee. Thus, I posted a redirect from Lake Mykee Town into Holts Summit. I had also sourced my information. Please change it back or tell me how my edit can be more constructive? Thank you. 184.6.88.18 (talk) 09:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Brookfield Asset Management/Birch Mountain class action

Hi Jim1138, I was surprised to see that within perhaps one or two minutes of my edits on the Brookfield Asset Management page they had already been reverted, leading me to believe that perhaps it was done with some automatic tool, without proper examination, because I believe my edits were valid and constructive. Since the lawsuit has been dismissed without merit, it appears to me that any extra information with unnecessary details should be excluded, and that is what I did. I also added two sources to support the contentions. I hold that my edits were indeed constructive, and I would appreciate if you could re-instate them. Thanks, 104.224.55.68 (talk) 08:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your edit summary of "removing extraneous information" didn't fit with your edit. Jim1138 (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

What I meant was that I took out unneeded details, which is exactly what I did. I dont think I added anything, I just shortened the section and added two citations. I also was responding to a request by another editor, Harkennen, I believe, to shorten the section. I would like to re-instate my changes, if I may. Do you agree? Thanks. 104.224.55.68 (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

No problem. Please be a bit more specific with your wp:edit summaries. I run into much effacement. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll get right on it. 104.224.55.68 (talk) 09:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

why'd my page get deleted exactly??

what's your reason.. all that information is genuine.. and i've seen some ridiculous pages that are still up.. so why?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starboyforlyfe (talk • contribs) 09:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Starboyforlyfe: The deletion was not in regards to it's accuracy. It did not establish wp:notability. BTW: I only tagged it, an wp:administrator reviewed the tag, made the decision, and deleted it. You might try creating the page through wp:article for creation. When you consider the article ready, you can submit it for review. Jim1138 (talk) 20:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Plus one, minus one

Hi Jim. Thanks for reporting this odd IP editor who adds a character and then reverts themselves. I see it's a long-term issue, which I wasn't aware of. This film pops up on my watchlist from time to time with the same pattern. I'll make a mental note about this. Thanks again. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: Such interesting behaviors pop up on Wikipedia. I would think there are many, many potential PhD thesis here. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Arabic Numerals Revert

Hi Jim, I did explain why I removed that part in an older revision : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arabic_numerals&oldid=783646387 : The part you reverted was reverted from someone else without giving a good reason why. I'm still waiting for his response here: Talk:Arabic numerals#Hindu numerals.3F. Regards. -- HAAAHEEE (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

removede no!art

Hello, I am a user and a member of the group no! Art. I think it is possible to change the name from enzo mastrangelo to vincenzo mastrangelo

http://enzo.no-art.info/+memo-de.html

Greatinghs http://enzo.no-art.info/+memo-de.htmlincenzo Mastrangelo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enzoemme2017 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Hi Jim1138, Could you please explain how I "blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia" on the Constitutional Union Party page? Ezhao02 (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

@Ezhao02: My apology. I misunderstood your rearrangement. I restored your edit. Thanks for the note! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Apology accepted. By the way, you can revert my edit if you think it is unhelpful. Ezhao02 (talk) 01:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

List of wars involving Serbia in the Middle Ages

Person is back on List of wars involving Serbia in the Middle Ages adding over 7,000 characters of unsourced and unexplained information. What steps do I take in this situation? Thanks. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Person just added back the unsourced information. Undoing your edit. Same thing now happening on List of wars involving Serbia. Look at Peacemaker67's last edit there. That was the last appropriate edit. These people are relentless. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 13:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

I didn't remove content, I replaced it. I made an edit, but someone made an edit too, resulting in an edit conflict. So I made Ctrl C + Ctrl V and replaced content.176.36.57.234 (talk) 02:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Bianca Ryan page

Hi.

I accidentally removed the material about Bianca Ryan's Filmography. Thank you for the feedback and for fixing it.

But I'd like you to consider the changes I made on the discography page. I added more detailed information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.45.75.23 (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Extreme Rules 2017

I brought back the reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.36.57.234 (talk) 02:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Jim118

Hi Jim. You recently sent me a message where you said I had edited The Kapil Sharma Show. I had not edited these, so I went to my Contributions page where it showed that I had edited certain articles which I had not. 47.15.13.223 (talk) 03:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

IP addresses for internet access can change, especially for mobile web editors. Ignore the message if it does not apply to you. You may wish to get an wp:account which would reduce the problem. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Portsmouth Ohio

Hi Jim1138, I was trying to improve the organization of the Portsmouth, Ohio Page. Its history is currently organized as 'Foundation', 'Growth', and 'Decline'. It should be like other cities, where historical periods are organized under "Foundation", "20th Century", and "21st Century". The overemphasis on a 'prescription drug epidemic' would be improved if a new section on Healthcare was added. A historical period should not be categorized as a 'Prescription Drug Epidemic'. How can we organize to change that? Thanks, Shawneesoc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawneesoc (talk • contribs) 20:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Is there a specific reason that articles about cities absolutely must have History sections organized into 'Foundation' and then individual centuries? Surely there are plenty of cities where that would be impractical or not ideal -- I am not only thinking of Athens and Rome. If a particular city's history is best described in three subsections Foundation, Growth, then Decline, then it seems sensible to do so.

I do agree that 'Prescription Drug Epidemic' is not a sensible section of any city article. The events would need to be of a scale and significance clearly different to things happening elsewhere in the same country, as for example some of the sub-sections of the article about the British town of Rotherham. MPS1992 (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

@Shawneesoc: If the problem is extreme, Prescription Drug Epidemic would be wp:DUE. There are rules and there is wp:ignore all rules and wp:BOLD. See wp:Manual of Style for suggested formatting. I would suggest modeling after other articles of similarly-sized American cities with similar problems. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the links, Jim1148. You asked if there is a specific reason that articles about cities absolutely must have History sections organized into Foundation and then individual centuries. While I think the better question to ask is if there is a specific reason that Portsmouth's page absolutely must be organized differently than other cities, my answer to your question is that the page should strive to be objective. When authors enter judgments on historical periods, such as 'growth' and 'decline', we are then forced into defining the terms of growth and decline. Population Growth? Sustainability Growth? Spiritual Growth? Growth of Economic Activity? Growth of civil liberties? And so on. The emphasis on the criteria used to determine growth and decline varies across readers and authors. The page currently deters additional information from recent years, unless it is about prescription drugs. I haven't found any city in the region that has a wikipedia page organized this way. Can you please confirm the edit, and then we can add more information about the 21st Century. Thanks. (Shawneesoc (talk) 16:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC))

Libellous, Blasphemous sex with Jesus

The James Kirkup poem, The Love That Dares to Speak Its Name, describes fictional sexual relationships between Jesus, his dead body, and a Roman centurion, among others. On the poet's page it states that the poem described the "lust" that the centurion felt towards Jesus. It seem to me that this is unduly euphemistic since the poem in fact details, repeatedly, fictional sex. Since it was the last, or one of the last, instances of the use of the law against blasphemy it seems important to me to note the extreme nature of the poem. I am not sure why you consider my edit (I am sorry I was not logged in) "unconstructive." Your revision seems to me to be ongoing censorship of even the content of the poem. I am not suggesting that wikipedia offend people by quoting from the poem, but to hide the nature of the poem seems unwikipedian. The judge in his summation described the poem as libelous, and therefore blasphemous, precisely because it puroprts sex acts and not merely feelings such as lust please see this book.--Timtak (talk) 03:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

@Timtak: My apology. Something strange happened here. I left a message here and then the archive bot removed it here. Here it is again!

I made the assumption given the edit and the content that you were somehow testing Wikipedia. Something along the lines of "Can I add anything and get away with it?" I just discovered that an IP changed The Drowned Sailor to hi and removed it. Please restore, perhaps with an ES that is less up to misinterpretation. ;o) Jim1138 (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Adding references

I don't understand the directions to adding references. It is so long and there are so many words and it looks so confusing! It looks like whoever typed that was just typing words. My head almost exploded! I can't process all this info through my brain! Please help! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jim1138&action=edit&section=new# — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.20.56.155 (talk) 18:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

My bad

Sorry hombre, I over reacted. My bad. I'm mad but i shoudldn't have taken it out on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddsucc (talk • contribs) 03:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

WRC

Removed the points list because I think it is not needed anymore. The pointsystem has changed and it doesnt show right stats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.157.69.90 (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Transcritical cycle

@Jim1138: I did add a source. All the stuff I added was from that source. I rewrote (rather than rephrased) the facts in my own words from the source to completely prevent any copyright complaint. I already know i cannot quote, but banning rewriting? I guess that was just you flattering me. Perhaps the only issue with it was it was centred over the processing of CO2 with the cycle rather than the cycle itself. Charlieb000 (talk) 06:00, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Charlieb000: Your edit here. A bit did have a reference, most did not. Also, it is off-topic. It's not about CO2 in refrigeration and its pros-and-cons. Jim1138 (talk) 06:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: That was why I said there may have been an issue was over the processing of the gas. The aim was to familiarise the reader with how it was implimented in that circumstance, their application of the cycle. If we cannot supply examples this site will be boring. Charlieb000 (talk) 06:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

You don't need to ping me to my talk page. It also becomes a matter of wp:DUE. The example should not be the major portion of the article. Jim1138 (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

gallbladder

hi jim, i think we should remove all that chinese content. As i stated in my edit, chinese superstion, opinions, traditions and civilization are largely irrelevant, especially when speaking about topics motivated and justified by western science. Please respect my edit; it was not an act of vandalism on my side. thanks, bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.211.170.119 (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Lgbt in algeria

the deleted parts include:

• accusations based on NOT exciting arguments
• absence of neutrality of the editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just a good boy (talk • contribs) 10:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Just a good boy: What is a "exciting argument"? Please see wp:KDL. I suggest you read wp:neutral point of view. I don't think it is what you think it is. Jim1138 (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Lipstick Under My Burkha

Hi! You just deleted a whole bunch of edits I have made on the page i.e. all the awards the film has won/screenings it was at etc. I am making this changes from the director of the film Alankrita Shrivastavas office. It will take me forever to dig up articles to support film festival screenings. Do I need to do this?

182.70.72.72 (talk) 10:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Yusuf al-Qaradawi

Please revert back to my edits. Citations will be added soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.180.21 (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

LGBT rights in Algeria

i meant unexisting arguments cuz there are no found references for those accusations .the removed parts describe algerians people as they often and randomly commit hate crimes against homosexuals including tortures and murders .in other word algerians live in a jungle and they don't respect their own laws .if you believe these accusations without need for arguments to prove them. while u need always proofs when someone criticizes something u like it . u should know that the internal honesty is the key of the wisdom . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just a good boy (talk • contribs) 11:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Just a good boy: Again, see wp:KDL. Jim1138 (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello I need help

I am trying to fix my fathers Wikipedia page it is full of false information and information that is private about living people I just rewrote it with the right information and it got reverted the sources are wrong but I don't have sources to disprove them ((Michael Recanati)) Flamingoflorida (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2017 (UUt

My father was not notable the only reason he has a page is that the Washington free beacon published a false articles about political donations the writer of the article about the chickens did not even speak to my father or was authorized and the Wall Street journal was not accurate Flamingoflorida (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete away unnecessary nonsense by user

Sorry Jim, I'm trying to do away an unnecessary nonsense written by that user, the word "dog defecate" very disgusted upon seeing it, it should be deleted. AhmadFauzi (talk) 05:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@AhmadFauzi: Tide rolls archived that off his talk page. I would suggest asking about it on that person's talk page rather then futzing with their archive. If a vandal adds something like that to someone's archive, then by all means remove it. Add an wp:edit summary explaining why. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Dan Evins Cracker Barrel page edit.

I noticed an irrelevant comment about Brad's wife, so I deleted it. I didn't mean to delete anything else.MightyOracle (talk) 09:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@MightyOracle: You also removed all of the article's citations which followed. I removed the two sentences about Donna Evins here Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Bison

Okay, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrkin (talk • contribs) 17:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Perceptual Load Theory

Hello Jim, My apologies for not leaving an edit summary, this is my first time making an edit as it was for an assignment for my masters degree. The reason for my edits was due to the high number of mistakes and lack of clarity in explaining the theory. I aimed with my article to simplify and clarify the core principles of the theory using the knowledge gained from my 'visual attention and neuropsychology' masters class. Furthermore, the article was blatantly incorrect about the critiques of perceptual load theory that span several decades and are well supported. I felt that by ignoring that part of the literature a reader would have been misguided as to the complex history of the validity and reliability of the Perceptual Load Theory.

I will attempt to change back my article soon to the state that I put it up in. If you feel that my article is inadequate in any way please let me know via my talk page.

Kind Regards,

Aviragus (talk) 10:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Warning

I understand your warning and I will not do it again Colored (talk) 04:54, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Afshar house

Dear Jim,

I am writing a dissertation on Afshars and unfortunately exact information does not exist on none of Nader Mirza sons. However 4 of them were left alive while 3 of them were blinded and sent to the North (which Akhundov was also from Northern part) and one to India. The surname Akhundov is a very rare surname, which means - Akhund (the ruler, the royal member). So that kind of makes a sense. I will publish and make a citation on my studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Afshar (talk • contribs) 09:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Governor of Machakos

Why delete a creation of an article Governor of Machakos and redirect redirect it to Machakos County a governor and a county are two distinct offices and entities — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisiblered (talk • contribs) 09:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Just let me do that.. But I now understand why many pages of African setups end up as stunts.. You guys vandalize by redirects to many unrelated.. Machakos count is a geographical place.. Governor of Machakos is a constitutional office in that area.. And that is where you are loosing it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisiblered (talk • contribs) 09:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@Invisiblered: If you don't add a source, people won't trust the content. May I suggest you start by reading the welcome and help section. Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes "~~~~" Jim1138 (talk) 09:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Undid revision 786053590 by CommonsDelinker (talk)

Can you just stop deleting content lest you fill Wikipedia with stuff that only you know — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisiblered (talk • contribs) 11:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Devendranath Sharma Edit

Hello Jim

I have added the content after verification from his son Dr. Vinaysheel Gautam. Dr. Vinayshil Gautam, M.A., Ph.D., FRAS serves as Professor of Department of Management Studies of Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi. Also information about Devendranath Sharma is available on http://dkifoundation.org/index.php/events-a-activities/acharya-devendra-nath-sharma .

Also you can have a look at below references:

An Ode to Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma (edited by Dr. Vidya Niwas Mishra, the noted Hindi Scholar) containing a description of the contributions and times of Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=_D2YJU3Fhb8C&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=ek+samashtimaya&source=bl&ots=BfFtgxc-yZ&sig=FA770TQEGGQGqO_WYIj_rXSvl74&hl=en&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwj1y76urMfUAhVErY8KHbNmDsYQ6AEIJTAA#v=onepage&q=ek%20samashtimaya&f=false

Regards BrianPaes — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianPaes (talk • contribs) 12:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Wavinya Ndeti

You want help me.. Just upload an image of wavinya Ndeti on Wikipedia... http://www.google.com/search?q=wavinya+Ndeti&hl=en-US&source=android-browser&prmd=nisv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij2_Sq6snUAhXGBcAKHV0jBt0Q_AUICigC&biw=600&bih=847#imgrc=IGbAnHkVIq66QM:coz you have frustrated me... Some content is free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisiblered (talk • contribs) 12:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@Invisiblered: Can you give me a specific link for a free image? There must be something on the image that states it is free. I don't want to go through dozens of images. I checked several on flickr, but most seem to have been deleted. this image has "All rights reserved" in the lower right corner, so it can not be used. this is tagged "public domain". The majority on Flickr appear to be "All rights reserved" Jim1138 (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Dayanidhi Maran

Hi Jim, you have removed the changes which I have made on Dayanidhi Maran. you seem to have mechanically removed the changes which I have made without apply your mind.You should realise that the information on this page relates to a living person and the earlier edits were of poor sourcing, and hinted to defame this person in this page. Parpann (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)www.dmaran.in

@Parpann: You should realize that the article is a biography and not a hagiography. Your definition of "tabloid journalism" seems to be all-encompassing. I suggest you read wp:NPA Jim1138 (talk) 11:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

81.128.186.50

I removed the warnings from their talk page as a courtesy, in order to try to deal as sympathetically as possibly with someone expressing the concerns that they were doing. Hope you don't mind me doing so (I'm aware that yours were recently added). As I made clear in the edit summary, this is not a licence for them to repeat the article edits. I hope this approach works. Regards, --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 11:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Money money tickle parsnip: Thanks for taking that on. Best of luck. Wikipedia needs more people like you! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 11:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Devendranath Sharma Edit

Hi Jim

Regarding your comment on Devendranath Sharma edit. This is a summing up of major commentaries on writing of Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma available in the book: Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma: Ek Samashtimaya Vyaktitva - (translated into English the title would be :An Inclusive Personality) edited by Dr Vidya Niwas Mishra, who was the editor of Navbharat Times and a very respected commentator in Hindi. The book was published by Vaani Prakashan. The book was released in Rashtrapati Bhawan in 1993 and Dr. Shankar Dayal Sharma, the then President of India received the first copy. All comments made on Acharya Sharma are based on this book which is cited under reference.

@ What is this all about: Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma cleaning the walls of Patna University. It seems rather silly to me.

This is to show how he was for Swachhta, cleanliness decades before it became a movement in India. However if according to your policy it needs to be deleted, please delete it.

--BrianPaes (talk) 13:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Replying on BrianPaes' talk page Jim1138 (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Do not delete my edition in the article "... And Then There Were Three ... Tour"

Maybe erase my article because it is in another language? If you want, I'll explain to you better if your head is late. What I did was add data, remove incorrect data and clarify some. I removed the box from "canceled" because it was too much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisandrolabbe7 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Arsenio Hall Show

Hello. I recently updated a page with accurate information concerning an infamous moment in the Arsenio Hall Show. As verified with IMDb, the right date of the taping is December 1990, where Paul Hogan was also a guest. May 1991 doesn't include any appearance by Hogan. Here's the link with information about the show and incident. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1344456/?ref_=rvi_tt Feel free to include it on the page. Thank you so much. (Rodrigo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.140.61.113 (talk) 23:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Power Rangers

Hey, I removed it because it's just a dodgy website trying to get page views. As far as I'm aware a box office bomb has never been given a sequel based on toy sales and there's no evidence that this film will be an exception. 2.102.184.54 (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Good point. I restored your removal. Jim1138 (talk) 09:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Estavayer-le-Lac

Hi, Since you seemed to care about the afformentionned page, I thought I could ask the question directly to you, as I couldn't find a talk page about it. I wanted to correct the Mayor, since it has changed quiet a while ago already : [official website showing the members of the "town council" (I guess it can be called like that): https://www.estavayer.ch/autorites-administration/conseil-communal the Mayor is now André Losey] However, since Estavayer-le-Lac merged with other into Estavayer at the beginning of the year... it doesn't really make sense: Estavayer-le-Lac being a former municipality, it doesn't have a Mayor anymore. Should I simply remove the government section and create a new one on the Estavayer page? Same for the link to the website. It is now a redirection to the site of Estavayer. I would change it, since estavayer-le-lac.ch doesn't exist anymore, but should I really put a link to a bigger entity's website or simply remove it (and simply add it to the Estavayer page)?

Oh and on the page Estavayer, the municipalities which have merged with Estavayer-le-Lac into Estavayer are listed in neighboring_municipalities ... which doesn't make much sense (since they're not municipalities anymore ... and they're Part of Estavayer ...) should we list the real neighboring municipalities instead?

Thank you very much

128.179.254.234 (talk) 09:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please feel free to change it, but per wp:verifiability, please wp:cite a wp:reliable source (RS) to support your information. help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes, and wp:RefToolbar. If you have an RS, and wish for me to do so, please leave the links here and I would be glad to assist. Hopefully, Google translate will be sufficient. Please tell me what needs to be removed and what needs to be changed. Preferably something on the lines of "Change X to Y" With X being what is removed and Y being what is added to replace it. You could also add it to the article's talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Swachhta is a hindi word which means cleanliness . You can not find meaning of that word in any English dictionary. There is also many article related to swachhta on Wikipedia. Please go through one of them: Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. However if according to your policy you do not find it suitable you can remove it.--BrianPaes (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Please help to sort this out at an early convenience. This will be much appreciated. If you want the write up re-formatted in any manner, please advise. I draw the model from various write ups that I saw.--BrianPaes (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

A NolifePlays fur yu

surry fhur edit wikipeeda artickl hav a kittlen

LolFins (talk) 07:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Greek Super Cup Sources

• Hello.Article "Greek super cup" is wrong.
• Here the sources:* Σούπερ Καπ: Ένας… ξεχασμένος θεσμός sport-fm.gr
• RSSSF
• http://www.worldfootball.net/winner/gre-supercup/

• Please correct it.--188.4.49.97 (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

My processing is correct. You can restore it. It's just like the source information.

• And this [[1]],is the Greek wikipedia edition.--188.4.49.97 (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Copied info to talk:Greek Super Cup#Article would seem to need cleanup Please discuss there. Jim1138 (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Anthony bailey

Many Thanks for the message. I pressed the complete button before I could add my comments. Sorry! It's seems to me that the proposed changes made are reasonable and in line with Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and much of the information supplied by user Hunc does not seem relevant to an article. It is either based on information secured from an unreliable source namely Mail online. The constantinian order dispute is well documented and therefore should be covered under those pages rather than on dispute referenced in detail on a personal bio page of a living person. It's not the style for a Wikipedia entry. I base by views by looking at other articles written about other senior members of this disputed order for reference. Additionally Bailey is the special envoy of Antigua and Barbuda, according to many sources , holds a diplomatic passport of that country, and has been knighted by that country. Therefore the removal of this references to his Antiguan role seem odd and inappropriate and there is no doubt that a large part of the controversy stirred up in the gossip pages of the mail and mail on Sunday revolve around this role . Would welcome Your thoughts. 2001:8A0:7BDD:FA01:8C46:2350:86D4:123E (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Just doing wp:RCP and noted the major content removal w/o comment. Going to bed. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017, Abdominal Obesity

Hi, I added F.U.P.A to the 'synonyms'(nicknames) for Abdominal obesity and I find it inappropriate that you removed my edit because I cited a proper source, and added a valid name. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.194.212 (talk) 15:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

FUPA is fat under the skin the article is about fat in the abdominal cavity. Jim1138 (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Ok, however it's just another casual/unformal form of saying fat in the Abdominal cavity (for example; beer belly). I was just trying to contribute to the community, but thank you for doing your job, sir. Also, it's F.U.P.A. Not FUPA. Thanks, Good night. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.194.212 (talk) 04:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

According to your source, It is used to describe excessive adipose (fatty) tissue or loose skin in the mons pubis area of the pelvic region. That is not in the abdominal cavity, it is the skin. They are two different areas. Abdominal obesity the fat is around the intestine and associated organs. The other is between the abdominal muscle and outer skin. They look different and have different health effects. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

changes to Bruce Haigh page

HI Jim

I am not used to Wikipedia, but you reverted my changes on the basis that I did not adequately explain - I did say that the chnges were revised text from Bruce Haigh himself, as I am his web designer and he asks me to do these things for him. He sent me the revised text in a word document and instructed me to replace the wikipedia article with his new revised text. I did not realise that my explanation was not adequate. As a result, Bruce Haigh has said that you have revereted the info back into containing incorrect information. For example, he no longer grows olives etc etc, but the reverted text now says he does again. If Bruce gives me his entire revised information to replace the wikipedia article, am I not allowed to do that if I say it is revised text from Bruce Haigh in my comment? For now, I will talk to Bruce again and discuss more granular corrections to ensure it does not get reverted again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Millsweb (talk • contribs) 00:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Your mistake

Wikipedia was made to allow anonymous editors to add/or correct mistakes on articles. You falsely accused me of "disrupted editing" because a previous editor made mistakes to an article I tried to correct. If you blocked me then what is the point of Wikipedia? Why are you bullying me for correcting an article Stormzy is British! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.39.183 (talk • contribs) 20:51 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Read the "hints" on your talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep On

We need to keep old version Sunwar people, thank you Jim1138 🙏 Dskoich (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The Fiscal Times editing earlier today.

Hi Jim. I deleted the two items for accuracy and updated staff names. Happy to discuss. Jackie Leo. Best if you email me directly, if possible at jleo@thefiscaltimes.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:EE81:6E00:94F:50A2:A101:9863 (talk) 05:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

I would prefer to keep the discussion on your talk page: user talk:Jackie Leo The problem with your edit was one of unexplained removal of cited content and addition of unsourced content. I left information on your talk page. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The Chatbots Edit Today

Hi Jim1138. Can you please specify how my content and link was not appropriate? I've gone through that link few weeks ago and found out that it's informative. I've also refer few people to read that. I'll happy if you can recheck the things. Scarlettod (talk) 08:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Scarlettod

Stacy Francis

this information is about me! I don't want people knowing my age. and anything else that I removed was because it was disparaging to my name and my career. I am making changes that I don't want the public to see. Why did you put it back????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stacyfrancis1 (talk • contribs) 10:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

hi

im sorry that i removed content without adequately explaining why, but your not my mommy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.86.55.70 (talk) 09:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I am giving you a kitten because I have to admit: You are very good at editing pages and having them make more sense! Plus, you are kind to everyone on Wikipedia! You always know the right thing to do! Thanks! (By the way, I am that user with the IP 184.20.56.155. I have joined Wikipedia!)

Pancakes654 14:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Extended confirm user

Am I a extended confirm user if not how do I become one on Wikipedia Colored (talk) 00:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

NLP AFD

Hi, as somebody who has contributed occasionally to articles on neuro-linguistic programming I wondered if you could have a look at this AfD, which is not getting much attention. Famous_dog (c) 07:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

question about interlanguage link

@Jim1138: Can you help me to add an interlanguage link to this page:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savage_Sun?

This is the interlanguage link: http://epo.wikitrans.net/Savage_Sun 8wolves (talk) 10:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)8Wolves

Proposal for a Category:Wikipedia stub templates by topic

Hi Jim1138. I have just proposed a new category for organizing stub templates, what do you say? Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

2016 Statistics of Munich Airport

Dear Team,

I mainly removed the statistical route record from Munich Airport because it is of 2015 and it is incorrect. I would also suggest you to update the 2016 statistical data for Munich, Frankfurt, Paris CDG Airport, Zurich airport too.

Thanking you; Your's sincerely, Sidharth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.121.3 (talk) 07:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

2016 Statistics of Dubai Airport

Dear Team,

Please update the 2016 statistical data records of Dubai International Airport. The 2015 statistical data of Dubai airport is wrong and I don't have the correct 2016 data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.121.3 (talk) 07:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

BYU talk page

I wrote up a discussion for you and others on BYU's talk page, james.

174.23.183.180 (talk) 08:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Affleck

I am not vandalizing Ben affleck's awards page. Please compare my version to the current one. I'm just trying to make it better that's it, nothing more.

Long term abuse. Jim1138 (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Yeah taking almost 3 hours working on that and finding references for those awards is vandalizing. I'm sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:F:0:0:0:58 (talk) 08:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Managed to type in 80k of data w/o error. Copy/paste from previous LTA version. Nope Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

And that version is wrong regardless. Again 6 references the page currently has, I've helped a lot by adding 173 references. I've done my homework. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:F:0:0:0:58 (talk) 08:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Kamma (caste)

Why are you adding all irrelevant material? Rajal naikil (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rajal naikil: It's quite relevant. Don't remove it. Jim1138 (talk) 08:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

But there are no sources.....check the source it says naidu not Chowdary..... Remove the ancient history it is completely irrelevant and not related Rajal naikil (talk) 09:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Chowdary and Rao already added in caste titles section Rajal naikil (talk) 09:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Instead u can add Kammanadu and Kakatiya and Musunuri dynasty in the place of kurmi story Rajal naikil (talk) 09:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rajal naikil: First "But there are no sources" and then "check the source"? What? The ancient history section definitely stays. Jim1138 (talk) 09:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Ancient History section must be deleted.....there is no proof to say Kammas came from kurmis.....this is not wikipedia reliable source.......Kammanadu article check Rajal naikil (talk) 09:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

On Bankura Government Polytechnic

You're absolutely right. What you said is logical and reasonable. I'll comply when I next try to edit anything. Warm regards. Master Kripa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kripamoy Mondal (talk • contribs) 13:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

'An Unearthly Child'

So long since I logged in to Wikipedia, I've both forgotten and lost not just the password I last used, but also the user name. Regardless, I'm Stef Anthony Coburn. My father wrote the work in question (a month or so after my ninth birthday, as I only too well recall). As the present lawful owner of all my late father's 'Doctor Who' related intellectual properties, inclusive of a number of earlier, in certain aspects substantially different drafts of the story subsequently televised in November of 63. I can authoritatively state with categorical absolute certainty that there IS a difference, and your article is factually in error in failing to acknowledge it. Whether you like it or not, the collective title of the first story in four episodes was consistently, 'Doctor Who and The Tribe of Gum' throughout the development of the story up to the penultimate draft which he renamed 'Doctor Who and The Gift of Fire' before reverting (for unknown reasons) to 'The Tribe of Gum' for the final transmitted version. 'The Tribe of Gum' as you are clearly well aware, was rendered in four episodes, each with it's own individual title: in order: episode one: 'An Unearthly Child'; episode two' 'The Cave of Skulls'; episode three: 'The Forest of Fear'; and episode four: 'The Firemaker'. Given this well recorded fact, it made no sense at the time, and makes no sense now to ignore the three succeeding episodes, in favour of the lazy recourse (which is all this common error ever was) merely to the title of the first. Whilst it's certainly true that the story became widely known as '100,000 BC' and that this is in fact a far better title, with the eponymous 'Gum' having been more or less excised from the plot, a draft or two before the final one, the fact remains, as I have stated. See: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/The_Tribe_of_Gum_(script) in case you're considering the patently fatuously ridiculous notion of dismissing (once again) the verifiable and many times verified clear recollections of personally involved witnesses to and/or participants in the actual event under discussion, as 'original research', in which case my contempt for this same misapplied process, which has so presumed in the past, knows no bounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.27.154 (talk) 14:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Responded on their talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Kamma (caste)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		for your thankless defence of several pages incl. Kamma (caste) AltruismT a l k - Contris. 12:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

vivian lee

Jim I indeed included a source, why didn't you see the citation?

http://www.sltrib.com/news/education/2017/08/15/head-of-neurology-at-university-of-utah-reinstated-after-he-was-axed-by-vivian-leebr/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gashing (talk • contribs) 22:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

It looks like Jim has not reverted any of your edits, and actually the last time Jim left a message for you was back in May 2017? MPS1992 (talk) 23:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

University of Newcastle (Australia)

I think you might have dropped into this without being aware of the talk page discussion. There have been a number of IPs involved, all Telstra IPs by the look of it, wanting some disputed content in the article. We were having a discussion on the talk page (a pointless one, but a discussion nonetheless). Today an IP arbitrarily decided that disputed content should go in the article when there was no consensus. I reverted that and then Cjhard decided to pop in and do the same, working off votes rather than consensus. He doesn't seem interested in continuing the discussion, just bulldozing the content into the article to test consensus, which is not the right thing to do. Now another IP (also from Telstra) has popped in to disagree. His was actually a valid edit, since it just restores the WP:STATUSQUO. Despite being poorly stated, it's actually more appropriate than the other edits. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

...hi!

Thank you for helping! I will look into everything more tomorrow (making a real account...). I have a question about linking articles to those in other languages, also, though. In English there is an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_shock

and in German: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriegszitterer

The English is for the concept, the German is for the people affected by it - but they're fundamentally equivalent as e.g. the English wiki doesn't have ones on shell shock... victims. The German one however does link to the English article, but not the other way around. How would one fix that? I tried a while back when I noticed it, but it seemed extremely complex/confusing at the time. Thank you in advance!

2604:6000:B706:7200:6C79:97B5:26CF:94D9 (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

We are the official company representative from the corporate communication team at Arabtec Holding PJSC.

Dear Jim,

Kindly note we are from the Arabtec Holding Corporate Communications Team and are updating our Wikipage given that a lot of the data is out dated and in-accurate. We are now restoring the data with the latest content.

Kindly advise if you will require more information as we shall continue updating the page. For more information please feel free to contact us at social.media@arabtecholding.com

Regards,

Sara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arabtec Holding (talk • contribs) 10:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)