User talk:Mr. Smart LION/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Orphaned non-free image File:Dream Girl (TV series).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dream Girl (TV series).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The article Siddhi (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
See Talk:Siddhi (TV series). Doesn't seem to have aired or be due to air - not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Real Life Barnstar |
| for your work in Bollywood related articles. HINDWIKI • CHAT 01:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC) |
New Page Reviewing
 |
| Hello, Mr. Smart LION.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Mr. Smart LION. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Manmarziyan (film)
Hello, Mr. Smart LION,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Manmarziyan (film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manmarziyan (film) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Slatersteven (talk) 14:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:India's Next Top Model
Template:India's Next Top Model has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:58, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Zara Nachke Dikha
Template:Zara Nachke Dikha has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:03, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Hera Pheri series
Template:Hera Pheri series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Unexplained reversion
Re: this, it's really not helpful to revert people without providing an explanation. It just creates questions in their heads that you could prevent by being vocal up front. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Pirates 1.0 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable film, per WP:NF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 00:20, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Article about you
It appears someone tried to write an article about you (deletion log entry). If you know something about that, you may want to put a stop to it. Huon (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mr. Smart LION. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A question about another account
Can you tell me anything about the account Mr. Parmanand Vishwakarma? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @JamesBWatson: I don’t know anything about this account. Mr. Smart LION 04:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for answering. The account created a page (now deleted) which claimed to be written by you. It didn't look to me as though it really was by you, but I thought you possibly might have some idea who it might be. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Mr. Smart LION. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Neerja – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 25, 2019. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:BIG Synergy
Template:BIG Synergy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:A. R. Rahman
Portal:A. R. Rahman, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:A. R. Rahman and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:A. R. Rahman during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 11:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Pati, Patni Aur Woh (2019 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:TOOSOON, and undersourced.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sheldybett (talk) 09:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, Smart LION. I don't believe we have met. How are you and how's everything going with yourself? I've been working on my latest FLC btw. Please feel free to leave your comments there. Thank you and congratulations on your success with Padmaavat's FLC as well. 
— Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, this article failed three consecutive FACs. Before I go for the fourth time, I've decided to try with a PR first. Please do comment there if you have time. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:31, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Saanvi Talwar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DannyS712 (talk) 01:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Sooryavanshi has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A17NAN 14:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Smart LION, I was hoping you could post some comments at the PR of this 1978 Tamil film, Mullum Malarum. It is considered to be a breakthrough for Rajinikanth as an actor and protagonist as he was mainly into antagonist and supporting roles at the time. A fellow editor and friend of mine, Kailash29792, is planning to take this article to FA. Please do help him out as he is making a fourth attempt at FA for this film. Thank you. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also another thing. I've opened up a peer review for my next attempt at an FA. This article is about Kal Ho Naa Ho, a 2003 Indian Hindi film that has Shah Rukh Khan in the lead role. Please do have a look at the article and post your comments at the peer review, the link for which is right here. Do let me know when you post your comments at the peer reviews of both the articles. Thanks.
— Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Edit reverted
Hello User:Mr. Smart Lion Why are you reverting my edit. You should encourage editor who are creating article which are or would be important for Wikipedia as it will portray the actor's work in film or television. If you have problems with the article [WP:NFF] then do the page get reviewed or after getting review if it does not follow the WP:N then it should have been moved to draft or directly get deleted. Article : Bhoot Police & Rooh Afza (film). Then you should consider the article 83 (film) because the filming had not started yet and it should also be redirected. AR.Dmg (talk) 09:39, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- @AR.Dmg: Both the articles are meeting WP:GNG, which reads "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." But the problem with both the articles is WP:NFF, which reads "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date." Wait for shooting to begin. And as for the article 83 (film), pre-production shooting and training for the film had begun in January 2019. see this. And for Bhoot Police & Rooh Afza (film), there are no reliable sources confirming about actors' training or pre-production shooting for their respective films. Mr. Smart LION 09:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Mr. Smart LION: so thrn you could have move this 2 article to the draft space right or not?. Then why are you creating a redirect. So that in future it can moved to the main space by any editor. AR.Dmg (talk) 10:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Bhoot Police for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhoot Police is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhoot Police until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 16:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Rooh Afza (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rooh Afza (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rooh Afza (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 16:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Plagiarism?
In this edit from 13 April 2019 you added the phrasing, "The film is set in Uttar Pradesh and revolves around fairies, spirits, ghosts attacking grooms on their first nights of nuptials." Can you please explain why I find that same phrasing in this article dated 29 March 2019? Did you plagiarise this? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:07, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- I did not plagiarise it as I had given the source. If it is a problem, then I will take care of it. Mr. Smart LION 07:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Shreya Ghoshal
Portal:Shreya Ghoshal, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Shreya Ghoshal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Shreya Ghoshal during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Shine of India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shine of India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sid95Q (talk) 08:15, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
FLC request
Hi there, can you please leave your comments at my ongoing FLC? Thank you. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Andaz Apna Apna 2
Hello, Mr. Smart LION. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andaz Apna Apna 2".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
FAC
Hi, I hope you are doing fine. I have recently nominated an article for FAC. Please leave your comments if interested. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hindi Medium
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hindi Medium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CAPTAIN MEDUSA -- CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 06:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hindi Medium
The article Hindi Medium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hindi Medium for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CAPTAIN MEDUSA -- CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)