User talk:Mr anonymousMr

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tigalari script have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why you deleting my edits. Even my mother tongue tulu I know the history of my language. You unilaterally changing my edits which are real history of language Mr anonymousMr (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mr anonymousMr[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Mr anonymousMr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CptViraj (talk) 10:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Mr anonymousMr (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page is neutral. And does not contain any unwanted content and main reason of creation of this page is to give the knowledge about the topic based on latest research . If wikipedia considers this as violation we cannot do anything. And This page is created by referring some article on this topic.

Iam contest against deletion of my page Mr anonymousMr (talk) 10:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I declined to delete you page. However, your content there looks like it should be in your sandbox User:Mr anonymousMr/sandbox. So I suggest that you move the content there. User:Mr anonymousMr should have a little about you. You can say that you are a Tulu script user if you like for example. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kanara—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karnataka, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Prolix 💬 14:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 14:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed move[edit]

Please do not move Tigalari script again without a discussion, as there is no support for such a move. If you want to convince otherwise, please show good quality sources on the talk page. Glennznl (talk) 10:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tigalari script. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Glennznl (talk) 10:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming article ti Tulu Script Reasons :Tulu alphabet is a southern Brahmic alphabet derived from Grantha. The Wikipedia says this script under the name Tigalari script. As I’m a user of this script, the correct name of the script is Tulu not Tigalari. According to the scholar, manuscriptolist and Historian Dr. Keladi Gunda Jois the correct name of the script is Tulu. The main language of the script is Tulu &Sanskrit.Out of thousands of Manuscripts, very few works are in Tulu language. A script need not have the same name of the language(s) used. All academic institutions like National Manuscript Mission , French institute of Pondicherry , Oriental research Institute, Mysore etc refer the script as Tulu .Even Tulu academy, official organization for promoting Tulu language gives clarification saying- ತುಳುವಿಗೆ ‘ತುಳು’ ಲಿಪಿಯನ್ನು ಬಳಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿತ್ತು. ಈ ಲಿಪಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬರೆದ ಸಾವಿರಾರು ತಾಳೆಗರಿಯ ಗ್ರಂಥಗಳು ದೊರೆತಿವೆ ತುಳುನಾಡಿನ ಹಲವಾರು ವೈದಿಕ ಮನೆಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಈಗಲೂ ಪೂಜಿಸಲ್ಪಡುತ್ತಿವೆ( Tulu script was used to write Tulu language.) Devarakonda Reddy in his article Development and origin of script says ಅನೇಕ ಹಸ್ತಪ್ರತಿಗಳು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದ ಮಲೆನಾಡು ಪ್ರದೇಶದಲ್ಲಿ ದೊರೆತಿದ್ದು ಆ ಲಿಪಿಯನ್ನು ‘ತುಳು ಲಿಪಿ’ ಎಂದು ಕರೆಯುತ್ತಾರೆ. (Many manuscripts have been found in Malnad region of Karnataka where the script is called Tulu script. http://kanaja.in/archives/9027) Tigalari is a recent name given by scholars based on the Region after few manuscripts were discovered few decades ago. According to the native users and scholars and manuscriptologists ,the name of script is Tulu,not Tigalari. Even I have contacted native users and Scholars personally and clarified on the nomenclature of the script. Details can be given ,if needed. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you copy pasting this comment here but just replacing Tigalari with Tulu? Am I supposed to reply seriously to that? --Glennznl (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That what i supposed to tell you . It is origianlly known as tulu script not tigalari. Some people made changed the name to tigalari ro mislead people who are reviving this script even iam one of them.dont argue simply if you dont have knowledge about this. Why you not objected when this article name changed from tulu to tigalri. How can you sure that it is tigalari. When this page started that time this article named as tulu script not tigalari. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 16:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not comment he made. He just copy pasted that article replacing tulu with tigalari. What I commented it is the original article. Thats why I want to rename this article to original name the ie Tulu script. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 17:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode seems to be using the name Tigalari script, which seems to be an older and more neutral name than Tulu script. I see no reason to change it right now without any more sources. I also advise you not to move the page name again, because you might be banned from Wikipedia for WP:DE. Glennznl (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ladakh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Prolix 💬 14:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Jammu and Kashmir (union territory), you may be blocked from editing. Claiming that you are fixing a typographical error when you are changing the meaning is dishonest.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iam not done it by intention. I just referred pakistan administered kashmir article on wikipedia and In that article it is written as "country" not "administered by" so i did it by referring this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azad_Kashmir
Mr anonymousMr (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit had the edit summary Fixed typo. A typographical error is something like putting an extra "y" in the middle of your name because I pressed the wrong key by mistake.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Thank you marla Mr anonymousMr (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

I have reverted the map you added to the article on Ladakh. Please read Talk:Ladakh#Regarding the India Pakistan consensus of August 2019 about what map can be in the infobox. You will see that User:Fowler&fowler provided a link there to a consensus decision about what maps should be in the infobox.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:26, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, changing Tigalari script to Tulu script. We have discussed this before, so please stop until a new concensus has been reached on the talk page of Tigalari script. If you continue with disruptive editing, you may be reported. --Glennznl (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iam the user of this script. And it is called tulu script. There is another variant called tigalari which different than tulu script. I don't know why you acting like a expert if you don't anything. Even you are reverted my contribution in Tulu language page citing unsourced. Even I putted proper source link. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

create separate page for tulu script. Because it solve the conflict in the articles. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode does not agree. Please provide academic sources to back up your claims. --Glennznl (talk) 21:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See the latest unicode proposal it state the Tulu ,tigalari and Malayalam are different script from the same source which is grantha. Tulu script is used in Tulunad or undivided south Canara and tigalari is is used in North Canara but its usage is limited. There is less difference in these script ie.tulu script and tigalari script. Even unicode not agreed the term tigalari as a common name for this script. So it is recommended Tulu-Tigalari script as the common name for this combined script. I think at least the title should be renamed to Tulu-Tigalari script. It will good solution for this. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Tulu Nadu. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 16:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing, incl. page moves. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jammu and Kashmir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 12:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jammu and Kashmir (union territory). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 13:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ladakh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 13:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important information[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 12:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mr anonymousMr[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Mr anonymousMr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:FAKEARTICLE of Tigalari script

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — DaxServer (talk to me) 15:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karavali, you may be blocked from editing. Please refrain from adding inaccurate maintenance templates to Wikipedia articles. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tulu script for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tulu script is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulu script until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tulu , malayalam and tigalari are the different Script from the same source which is grantha Mr anonymousMr (talk) 08:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tigalari script into Tulu script. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for info. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 15:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Mr anonymousMr! Your additions to Tulu script have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]