User talk:Mukilteoedits/Archive 1

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mukilteoedits. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jax 0677 (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diana Huey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Diana Huey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlie Barnett (actor)

The article Charlie Barnett (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yuri Sardarov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Yuri Sardarov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NHCLS (talk) 22:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Ford (soccer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josh Ford (soccer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damion Lowe

The article Damion Lowe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fabio Pereira

The article Fabio Pereira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aaron Kovar

The article Aaron Kovar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Josh Ford (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Ford (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Ford (soccer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 03:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Good Food Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Good Food Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for deletion and listifying. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mukilteoedits. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Owl Time) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Owl Time, Mukilteoedits!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this article - it's appreciated. It's just been reviewed. Could you please look it over and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mukilteoedits. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mukilteoedits. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Springs Eternal (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hope Springs Eternal (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COPYVIO at Comments by Celebs

Hi Mukilteoedits. I've removed the episode summaries and requested that they be revdelled due to them being copied from the standard episode summaries without evidence that they've been released under a suitable licence. That said even if they were or if you'd created them yourself, the tone is all wrong for an encyclopedia -- WP:TONE applies. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I had noticed on another podcast page that the summaries were copied directly from the episode summaries, so I thought that was the standard (this was one of my first podcast articles). Thank you for the feedback, I'll be sure to look into this.

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Mukilteoedits/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Mukilteoedits/Archive 1,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Mukilteoedits/Archive 1,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Evans Behling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Evans Behling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Evans Behling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Disick (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

There have already been five deletion discussions concerning the notability of Scott Disick. See in particular Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Disick (4th nomination). Before that see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Disick, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Disick (2nd nomination), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Disick (3rd nomination). After that, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_2#Scott_Disick . There was also a deletion review; see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 June 25. This draft does not show any reason why we should ignore four AFDs, an RFD, and a DRV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott Disick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scott Disick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Thank you for the feedback. One question I have regarding your feedback is that you stated the sources were only passing mentions. This simply is not true. I cited more than 100 sources in this article, and while some of them do contain passing mentions, many do not. For example, Chicago Tribune, E! News, Architectural Digest, People, and this one HuffPost, among others. Additionally, notability is not temporary WP:NTEMP, and the most recent community consensus was to allow new draft, and you can find at least two other editors (alongside myself) who have commented on the main page talk page requesting that an article be made for this subject. I believe he meets WP:ENT parts one and two. He has been a main cast member in more than 140 episodes of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, has his own show on E!Network (new since last discussion of his notability), and has guest starred on a number of other shows. In reference to point two of WP:ENT, he has a large fan base (23.5 million Instagram followers; 6.8 million Twitter followers). Finally, the current redirect does not make sense, because he is no longer dating Kourtney Kardashian. He also meets WP:GNG, because he has significant coverage (which a quick Google search will show).

Hello, Mukilteoedits! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lia Epperson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lia Epperson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://collegium.universite-lyon.fr/mme-lia-epperson--39488.kjsp and http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=facpubs. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Puddleglum ^2.0_{(How's my driving?)} 19:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was a false positive, as the material was not copied, but the deletion was triggered by the references section and the lengthy names of institutions at which Epperson worked. Another user has confirmed and removed the tag. Mukedits (talk) 21:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trey Kennedy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trey Kennedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Kennedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ezra Rosser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ezra Rosser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezra Rosser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Early 21st-century civil rights movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early 21st-century civil rights movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early 21st-century civil rights movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 22:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Cargle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rachel Cargle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 21:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Deeper with the Dolan Twins

Hello, Mukilteoedits. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deeper with the Dolan Twins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Burt Jenner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burt Jenner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burt Jenner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PK650 (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burt Jenner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belle Isle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jordyn Woods has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jordyn Woods. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordyn Woods has been accepted

Jordyn Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your additions to Francie Swift

Thank you for adding the references you found to the article on Francie Swift. Because of your contributions the article was quite possibly saved from being deleted. At the very least the nomination was withdrawn. Very nice work. --ARose Wolf 16:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drew Ray Tanner has been accepted

Drew Ray Tanner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olympia Provisions Public House

Thanks again for your work on Olympia Provisions Public House! I've been working a lot on Portland restaurants lately, so was nice to see someone else take a stab at expanding a related entry. Holler if you expand other PDX restaurant entries! Either way, keep up the great work. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, thank you for all of your work! I just took a look at the list of Portland restaurants and I am now feeling very nostalgic about Montage, Tasty n Alder, and Alexis. I'll try to work on expanding some of the stubs on the list over the next couple of weeks. Mukedits (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mukilteoedits, Wonderful! I've promoted ~25 PDX restaurant articles to Good status recently. I guess I was a bit inspired to document the local food scene, watching the pandemic devastate businesses. Felt like one way to help. Looking forward to your future edits! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see Fifty Licks was not deleted. Hope you'll continue working on entries about PDX's restaurant industry. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, I took a little break from editing, but glad to see the page is still there. Will definitely try to contribute more to the PDX restaurant entries Mukedits (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kachka (restaurant), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belarusian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fifty Licks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fifty Licks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifty Licks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 17:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of REFORM Alliance

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on REFORM Alliance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chief advocacy officer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chief advocacy officer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fran's Chocolates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fran's Chocolates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fran's Chocolates moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fran's Chocolates, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs removal of the more promotional content. It was deleted for promotionalism, but at your request I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I shall then let someone else decide. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordyn Woods

The article Jordyn Woods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Written from fan point of view.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordyn Woods for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordyn Woods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordyn Woods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create a page

Hello,

My name is Franck. I’m founder of the hair are brand IGK HAIR and a celebrity hairstylist in US. I saw that you created for Jen atkin her page. Are you still editing pages ? Franckizquierdo (talk) 17:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Franckizquierdo: I am still creating and editing pages. If you would like to create a page for your company you should do two things.

1) you should create a page at Draft:IGK Hair and edit that page. When it's ready, you can submit it for review, and if it is approved, you it will be accepted by an article reviewer. In order to be approved there must be significant coverage of the company. 2) In creating the page, you MUST declare on the talk page that you are a founder and have a bias in creating the article. Hope this helps Mukedits (talk) 22:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chief advocacy officer

Hello, Mukilteoedits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chief advocacy officer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Jones

Thank you for creating the Julius Jones page. It was much needed on Wikipedia due to the amount of attention the case has been receiving, I was hoping someone was going to write it for ages. I've decided to start a requested move page on the current Julius Jones page because he is clearly not the primary topic. Maybe in the future your page can be renamed to just Julius Jones because I feel he is the most notable person with that name. Inexpiable (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Inexpiable: Happy to work on any similar pages that need to be created in the future - just reach out. Mukedits (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Running club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HSI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DOB's

Be sure to always add a DOB for an offender in prison. They can usually be found on the relevant correction site for each state the offender is incarcerated in. Cheers. Inexpiable (talk) 21:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lawyers from Maryland

A tag has been placed on Category:Lawyers from Maryland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Your edit to Juvenile Restoration Act has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: The "copyright" violation was the text of the law the page is covering explaining the legal requirements. U.S. federal and state laws are not protected by copyright. Can you please restore? The text is necessary for people to understand the law. If you cannot restore, can you advise on next steps? Mukedits (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but no. Wikipedia cannot be considered as a reliable source for copyright information. Under current copyright law, all literary works are subject to copyright whether they are tagged as such or not, unless specifically released under license or into the public domain. The only states that currently mark their documents as public domain are Florida and California. Please feel free to ask at Talk:CP or ask one of the people on this list for a second opinion.— Diannaa (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: In Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that laws are not copyrightable because "Under the government edicts doctrine, judges — and we now confirm, legislators — may not be considered the ‘authors’ of the works they produce in the course of their official duties as judges and legislators..." Even before this case, it is well settled that US laws and cases are public domain. I'm also not sure laws are literary works...

I'm not sure how the copyright law you are citing can apply to laws. I'm in law school and would never want to violate copyright law, so I am genuinely just trying to understand. If it's a simply a Wikipedia policy, then that's fine. That being said, some of the material you removed I had summarized myself and was not directly quoted from the law, which is frustrating for me. Am I able to rewrite the edits to the page and include the text of the law as a quote, or is that going to cause an issue. Mukedits (talk) 23:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add the text of the law here. Regardlessa of the copyright isasue, such large quotations are not suitable here, as Wikipedia is written in a summary style, avoiding the use of quotations unless there's no alternative. If you believe the text is public domain, consider adding it to Wikisource. Otherwise you could link to it in the external links and summarize the law in your own words in the body of the article.— Diannaa (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Reeves

The article Matthew Reeves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Quoting from WP:CRIME:
For perpetrators,

The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities;^[1] or

The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role.^[2]
Note: A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until the contrary is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured.

This was a run of the mill murder case that does not come close to satisfying the above criteria. Safiel (talk) 01:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 01:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death Row (Thomas Rhett song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death Row (Thomas Rhett song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Row (Thomas Rhett song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Misceditor1000 (talk) 21:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Courtney Parchman

Hello, Mukilteoedits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Courtney Parchman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Courtney Parchman

Hello, Mukilteoedits. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Courtney Parchman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coy M. Kiser, Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Coy M. Kiser, Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently only the News & Advance article qualifies. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Coy M. Kiser, Jr.

Hello, Mukilteoedits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coy M. Kiser, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Paris (Taylor Swift song)"

Letting you know that I redirected the article back to Midnights. Based on the latest condition of the article, it seems the song itself does not meet WP:NSONG. You can make a draft and submit it at Articles for Creation while searching for additional, sufficient external references to make sure it meets notability guidelines. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 06:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Example: John Hinckley Jr.
^ Example: Seung-Hui Cho.

[1] Example: John Hinckley Jr.

[2] Example: Seung-Hui Cho.

[1]

[2]