User talk:Padavalamkuttanpilla/archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Ambika jk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ambika jk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of J.K. Ambika

Hello, Padavalamkuttanpilla,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Akhiljaxxn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, J.K. Ambika for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a [decision] to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Akhiljaxxn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with East Coast Vijayan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Outspoken Kerala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outspoken Kerala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outspoken Kerala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of K.P. Sasikala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K.P. Sasikala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.P. Sasikala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Prakash Babu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakash Babu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Babu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 20:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Marunadan Malayali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marunadan Malayali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marunadan Malayali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Kutyava. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to East Coast Vijayan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Don't remove the tag, Self-published, before removing the self published sources. Kutyava (talk) 11:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at T. G. Mohandas, you may be blocked from editing. Kutyava (talk) 12:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Padavalamkuttanpilla reported by User:Kutyava (Result: ). Thank you. Kutyava (talk) 12:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at T. G. Mohandas. Kutyava (talk) 12:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at T. G. Mohandas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 12:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Padavalamkuttanpilla and Kutyava". Thank you. — Newslinger talk 13:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Your email

I received your email with a complaint about Kutyava (talk · contribs). Since this matter doesn't seem to involve privacy issues, I am responding here.

I am unable to take administrative action against a user who you happen to disagree with for that reason alone.

Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Padavalamkuttanpilla reported by User:Authordom (Result: ). Thank you. Authordom (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism on T. G. Mohandas

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at T. G. Mohandas, you may be blocked from editing. Why reverted my latest edit please explain. Authordom (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

My all of major edits was explained in summary please check that before revert. Authordom (talk) 10:51, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercy (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercy Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Relationship to other accounts

Hi, could you explain your relationship to Sanalkumarsidhu? TonyBallioni (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

TonyBallioni,Sanal kumar is my best friend and my roommate. He is brought me to Wikipedia..He taught more about Wikipedia..!!-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  06:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Amar Singh (Punjab politician)

Hello, Padavalamkuttanpilla,

Thanks for creating Amar Singh (Punjab politician)! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Amar Singh (Punjab politician). I recommend adding more text, if sources are available, on any media notice he may have received for his political positions, debates in the Congress, etc.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


Nomination of Shajan Skariah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shajan Skariah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shajan Skariah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Authordom (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Padavalamkuttanpilla reported by User:Riyastir (Result: ). Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riyastir (talk • contribs) 06:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

AfD nomination statements

Hello. I saw your few AfD nominations. You should work on your statements. You should explain why an article should be deleted, which policy/guidelines it doesnt follow, or violate. Otherwise the nomination might get labelled as spurious or thoughtless. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padavalamkuttanpilla, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Authordom (talk) 02:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sriram Venkitaraman, you may be blocked from editing. Authordom (talk) 08:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Deepa Nisanth

Is this article notable. 2409:4073:498:D9C8:19EF:E420:9902:36B0 (talk) 08:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:T. G. Mohandas

There has been a technical problem with the refund of Draft:T. G. Mohandas being done by cut and paste and I am currently sorting out a work around. There is a new version at Draft:T. G. Mohandas 2 and I would be grateful if you could confirm I have copied your contributions of 30 January 2020 their and you are comfortable with the attributions. If you are I will organise for deletion of the bad Draft:T. G. Mohandas fork. If this is unclear please ping me here. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Djm-leighpark:i admit you have copied my contributions properly to Draft:T. G. Mohandas 2 ,I suppose the Draft:T. G. Mohandas is no longer necessary..?? and I need your inner help to start editing the new version.Thanks-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  08:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for that .... hope to be sorted within 30 minutes from this post. ...Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Restore previous image

Hi, can you please restore the previous image in the bio infobox of Shamsheer Vayalil article? The previous image contained media related to common category in spite of that an editor Kcmazin has removed the previous image with new one. This user was also warned once by editor DGG for not adding promotional materials on wikipedia. I'm not giving baseless complains. You can check his user talk page User Talk:Kcmazin for confirmation.I have also warned him to restore the old image but he hasn't responded.So,I came to an experienced like you. I could have done this myself but I don't have enough knowledge in formatting bio infobox. Please look into this matter. Thanks. Angel white spell. (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  16:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padavalamkuttanpilla, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 19:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at T. G. Mohandas, you may be blocked from editing. Don't cheat Wikipedia admins by providing unrelated Malayalam articles and self-published articles as source. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 22:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Please note I find this WP:WPA as unwarranted and would anticipate an apology from Authordom. There may be issues issues with content but this particular attack is not appropriate in my opinion. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Sir, can you translate the Malayalam articles before you writing here. Please. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 22:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I would tend to agree in citations for all non English article I would like to see trans-title as a minimum and as many of author, date, publisher, access-date as possible; and use of quote in the citation is possible. I'd also strongly recommend use of the quote parameter in the cite if possible. This is especially important if used to support an important claim in the article. This is my preference and is not Wikipedia guideline or policy to my knowledge. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Djm-leighpark: ,I strongly believe it is a clear case of Political rivalry.-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh members

Why are you adding Category:Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh members when the article is already listed in RSS pracharaks ? Take Parrikar for example. please do a mass self revert. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

removedDBigXrayᗙ 10:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Why removed

Hi, few days ago you removed the profile picture of Shamsheer Vayalil from the bio infobox and placed a new one. You didn't give proper reason for the removal of previous image. I hope you must have gone through the External links section of the article. In that it is clearly stated that the previous image belonged to common category. Was that a mistake? or you intentionally did that. Pardaehnndsvver (talk) 04:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Canvassing over emails

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:46, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi@DBigXray:I Just asked my doubts and advice to an experienced editor.I don't know if it's a crime.because I don't know all the rules of Wikipedia. I've been studying this one by one.-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk 
Please follow WP:INDENT correctly. Also, If you are anyway related to a political party then you need to disclose this on your user page. --DBigXrayᗙ 17:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I am interested in indian political related articles but I am not affiliated with any particular political party.-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk 
Thanks for the reply. Please WP:SIGN with 4 ~ symbols. you appear to be using only 3.DBigXrayᗙ 17:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aswathy Jwala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aswathy Jwala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aswathy Jwala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aswathy Jwala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ GB fan 13:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Benoît Coquart

Hello Padavalamkuttanpilla. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Benoît Coquart, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being CEO or other major figure of a notable company indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#BIZBIO). Thank you. SoWhy 16:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi SoWhy, I Apologize for the negligence on my part.-- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  16:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Asianet News has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa, Sorry, you misunderstood,I didn't add any kind of copyright material there.I just only added this content and a few reference links.Perhaps it was done by an IP user.I have also reversed two disrepute edits..Is that you mean? -- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  05:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
In this edit you unknowingly restored copyright content that had been added by someone else. Please check carefully when restoring someone else's edit. — Diannaa (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. Surendran (politician) (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 10:53, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Padavalamkuttanpilla! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 10:53, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Refrain from re-submitting the article again and again, if the already declined version is re-submitted it will be declined again, with persistent submissions it may even be deleted. You want it to be accepted ? then re-write the article completely and then submit. If that fails too, then submit the AFD for deletion review, he easily passes the WP:GNG, a politician need not to be elected to create an article if he already satisfy the general notability guideline. Ciaos!. 2409:4073:21E:524F:6DF4:A374:B488:68CD (talk) 14:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Request on 21:04:51, 29 August 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by VGSangar


I've added some more references/links in the article - so will be resubmitting. I hope this referencing can be sufficient to meet the criteria of notability.

VGSangar (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

On Article on MK Kaw

Hi thanks for approving the page! I tried searching for Mr. Kaw but I didnt find the wikipedia page. Does the page automatically become public or will i need to do something else for the same? Thanks very much! Sm2804 (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Sm2804: Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia..! The article will be public .You can expand the article by adding more independent and reliable source if needed.Thanks-- Padavalam  ►  17:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of Ashu Gaur

Respected Sir/Ma'am, I wanted to talk to you regarding the speedy deletion of Ashu Gaur raised by you. I have submitted the reason why the page should be retained on Wikipedia. Do check it once and let me know what can be done from my side. Warm Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

This is the link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashu_Gaur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Your comment on Draft:Adeeb Ahamed (businessman)

You left an AfC comment on Draft:Adeeb Ahamed (businessman), I believe in connection with an AfC review. That comment was: Doesn't meet WP:CCSI#BIZBIO. I think you may have misunderstood the purpose of [[WP:CCSI. It is a list of circumstances that are Claims of significance. That is, an article meeting any of these should not be tagged for A7. That does not mean that an article not meeting one of these should be so tagged, and these are in no way guides to or conditions for notability. An article that meets one of these might still fail to establish notability, and many articles are about notable topics that do not meet any of these criteria. This list should not in my view be used at all in evaluating AfC drafts. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

@DESiegel:I understand that was a wrong addition on my part and I owe you for pointing it out me.-- Padavalam  ►  14:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Use of tools

Please use tools with care. You made an improper revert here. Further - you did not leave an edit summary, as you should have. --2604:2000:E010:1100:C44B:B2F0:71E2:B05F (talk) 07:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Relevance of Draft:Kerala Snakebite Murder Case

Do you think the article Draft:Kerala Snakebite Murder Case is relevant to continue.

What is meant by copyright content in this article. Are they sentence in the article or citations have to modify. Rahul Somantalk - contribs 10:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Give a suggestion about Draft:Kerala_Snakebite_Murder_Case

Hi please give some feedback about Draft:Kerala_Snakebite_Murder_Case the draft if possible. You have done the revision for this article.

 Done

Speedy deletion nomination of File:APAbdullakutty.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:APAbdullakutty.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://keralakaumudi.com/en/news/news.php?id=264082&u=fuel-price-hike-will-be-beneficial-for-the-nation--ap-abdullakutty-defends-fuel-price-hike. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kesari.png

A tag has been placed on File:Kesari.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Snak gurd.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Snak gurd.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kesari.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kesari.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Request on 14:51:27, 20 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by 68.192.216.144


Hello! I saw that you considered the page I created for John Fanning is not approved for publishing to Wikipedia. What can I do to fix that? Is the issue the sources I've used? Thanks in advance for your feedback!

68.192.216.144 (talk) 14:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 14:53:17, 20 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Greenwell23


Hello! I don't know if my last message disappeared but I saw you did not approve of my wiki page for John Fanning (businessman). What can I do to improve it and make it suitable for approval? Thanks in advance for your feedback and I would appreciate any help!

Greenwell23 (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

AFD

Rehana Fathima is non-notable person who does not deserve an article. She catches spotlight only through controversies, no productive contributions done to the society. Media reports it because of WP:SENSATIONAL, not because she has any notability. 157.46.160.17 (talk) 14:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aswathy Jwala

Hello, Padavalamkuttanpilla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aswathy Jwala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Do not accuse others just because you dont like their opinions

Please refrain from removing the Wikipedia content according to your political interests. I assume this was your comment about me removing the poorly sourced content from the article ;List of Youngest mayors of India. Can you define what you meant by political interest here. I just followed some guidelines here. If you dont like it, you can revert it. No problem. But dont accuse others blindly just beacuse you dont agree with them. Happy editing! Cheers. Shahoodu (talk) 07:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Request on 14:41:49, 17 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Midnight713


First, thanks Padavalamkuttanpilla for the quick review. I am surprised that the references were deemed as not significant coverage. I can include more references if necessary. I imagined that the National Ballet company of a sovereign country would be worthy of a Wiki entry but am open to correction and can delete if references are not sufficient. Any help with the specific of why the references are deemed insignificant would be appreciated Midnight713 (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Midnight713 (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Review request for Draft:Ballet Ireland

Hello, Padavalamkuttanpilla.
You reviewed my article Draft:Ballet Ireland yesterday and it was declined.
Since then I have added some further information and other editors have also made edits and added citations to the article.

Would you mind taking another look at it please? It would be much appreciated. Many thanks.
Sincerely, Midnight713 (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Padavalamkuttanpilla. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Help

May you please check the draft:Sheikh_Asif and remove the part which is advertising or promoting thus person Imtiyazrasoool (talk) 06:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi@Imtiyazrasoool:, glad to see here ..I checked that and I could not find any significant change.however other reviewers are paying close attention to that draft.-- Padavalam🌂  ►  14:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Should i add more references and add more information about this person Imtiyazrasoool (talk) 06:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

hi @Padavalamkuttanpilla:,thanku for your help, please recheck the draft now and review , now if it is stable for wiki then please move this to main place or else i want to stop working on this page Imtiyazrasoool(talk)

What type of sources are needed to approvet v director page ?

I applied for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Atif_Khan_(Director), but is declined unfortunately . I have added news sources (Republic India) , Verified IMDb links , daily soaps related shows etc. Every link proves that Atif Khan is the director of these shows Khan Ahsan 1 (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Mz7 (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Padavalamkuttanpilla. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2021-03-17. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 02:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Looks like you haven't been alerted before. Best, SUN EYE 1 18:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you!

Christi123321 (talk) 09:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Surendran (politician) (3rd nomination), you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shobha Surendran has been accepted

Shobha Surendran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Padavalam🌂  ►  11:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Prashanth Nair (IAS)

Hello Padavalamkuttanpilla. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Prashanth Nair (IAS), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not substantially identical to the previous version and so not eligible for G4. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Padavalamkuttanpilla/archive_1&oldid=1048412519"