User talk:Pburka/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Houston Street (Dallas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for FTM cross-dressing

An article that you have been involved in editing, FTM cross-dressing, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Conspiracy against you

You nominated the article MUD trees for deletion, but the votes were rigged by MUD owners who listed their MUD on page, as you can see on their forum here: http://www.topmudsites.com/forums/tavern-blue-hand/5287-defense-all-muds-our-genres-noteworthiness-being-questioned-16.html

Thus, they violated the WP:MEAT policy. They also plan to delete your articles as revenge. You should let an administrator know about it.EternalFlare (talk) 11:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Pburka. You have new messages at Patchy1's talk page.
Message added 12:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Patchy1 12:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Poetical Son Nat Powers

Oh yes! Didn't put the reference for the Nat Powers article, I will locate that ASAP and re write it with a reference. Thanks for pointing out! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.210.45 (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Nat Powers

Thanks PBurka! I will do just that! 86.6.210.45 (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for helping me with my first article! :) Dannygeez (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

ATSE / FTSE

FYI. (I agree.) Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC) (Obviously, it's time to do something not involving a computer. Good night. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC))

Stitch

You are right[1], looks unsourced, wrote it a long time ago. Will find a source and then put it back. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Arin Hanson

The article was changed greatly from the time you commented. Please judge it as now. [2] Note the number of interviews he has done in reliable sources. Please join the undelete discussion. Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 March 25 Dream Focus 22:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Naftalan AfD

Hello,

It appears that you've missed steps 2 and 3 of the AfD process (creation of discussion subpage and its inclusion in the main AfD list)... GregorB (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Canadian diplomats

Hi. Thank you for your contribution to the discussion about the bot run. Below is a list of Canadian diplomats who probably don't meet WP:DIPLOMAT. Would you like to work on any of these articles? If so I'd be grateful if you could let me know.

Thanks very much. Regards. Klein zach 06:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I've already started. You're welcome to help. It's very easy to find references for most of these demonstrating that they meet WP:GNG, and they mostly meet WP:POLITICIAN already. Pburka (talk) 06:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll take them off my bot run list for now. Can you possibly let me know when you have finished? I'll be working on other nationalities in the meantime. --Klein zach 06:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

No, I won't let you know when I'm finished. Wikipedia has WP:NOTIMELIMIT. If the topics are notable today they'll be notable ten years from now. Pburka (talk) 13:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Photos as references

Hello, Pburka. You have new messages at Bejnar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bejnar (talk) 16:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Roy William Blake

I don't know how I managed to remove part of the lede when I took the AfD tag out, but thanks for fixing it. --Michig (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Pburka. You have new messages at Beyond My Ken's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Chariot (Australia)

The articles suggested as reliable sources provide very little material which can be used to expand the article. Has the subject really been addressed directly in detail? For businesses and within the telecommunications and technology sectors developments may occur rapidly so those old article may not be reliable now. Does it still have 100,000 subscribers in South Australia? Are acquisitions in 2003 or earlier really remarkable? Details of Chariots VoIP service provider aren't significant. Are the key people mentioned in those articles still in those positions? We need reliable sources that can verify current information about the company. Please note that significant coverage in reliable sources is not a guarantee. Lets try to imagine the lead for an expanded article. What would you write in it to explain why the topic is notable? - Shiftchange (talk) 01:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

You seem to be adamant that the subject of the article is notable yet I haven't seen anything notable about it. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wal Chisholm, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Olympian and Robert Chisholm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Thanks for being vigilant about potential COI issues at the Nils Olav article. Iselilja (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello

During my wiki stalking I noticed you put a post on Epicgenius's talk page about Red Links. Following a...disagreement with an IP editor who was removing Red Links on Orphan Black, I have posted a question over on WP:RED over the definition of a "personal name". If you would like to come and contribute that would be great. -- MisterShiney ✉ 19:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Patience of a saint

You has it! JesseRafe (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

De-PRODs

Hi there, when you de-PROD article, it would be an idea to actually deal with the issue that has been raised. You seem to have simply blitzed through articles like Dan Maddicott and Anne Ripley Smith in quick succession without actually improving them, or stating claim to notability. Giant Snowman 10:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

It's a false economy though - and so by de-PRODding article but not actually dealing with the issues raised, notability still remains questionable and it is inevitable that the articles will shortly wind up at AFD, which means more work for everybody involved. Giant Snowman 11:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks. (I'm trying to think of some witty comment about my left hand not knowing what my right hand is doing ... ) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice

As an editor with an interest in New York City articles, you are invited to participate in an RfC at The Dakota. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.

Presumably this is in relation to Scared Famous, which is a WP:PROD, not WP:AfD. Pburka (talk) 02:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Pburka. You don't know me but I just wanted to say thank you for this comment you made at AN/EW regarding 155blue's edit warring report against me (for edits on my own talk page). Believe it or not, she also reported my supposed edit warring at the vandalism noticeboard, which of course was quickly dumped. She has apparently been educated several times about what vandalism is, but she continues to falsely accuse (and report) other editors of it. And she ignored me when I educated her about WP:3RR and WP:NOT3RR. I see that she also issued you a bogus warning just above this thread (without a signature, yet again). She doesn't know the difference between WP:PROD and WP:AFD, which doesn't surprise me because she warned me about moving a "warning" - on my own talk page, no less - that was actually a template. The most concerning issue, though, is that she only has 300 or so edits - most of them in the past four months - and has shown a pattern of of rashly issuing warnings to, and filing reports at various noticeboards about, editors. Even very experienced ones, like yourself. This pattern of hers seems to indicate that she prefers to go straight to noticeboards instead of having proper discussions with editors first, even though some of the editors are vastly more experienced than her and the allegations are flawed. Anyway, just wanted to say thanks for the very on-point comment you made. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 07:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Amy Linden

Most nationally-published journalists are notable, and this was editied since you prodded the article, so I removed your prod. You can always to go WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 22:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Online predation

WIki is supporting an online predator. You are complicit in online predation. Criminal activity. How stupid are you????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.141.253 (talk) 21:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

I have no idea what you're talking about. Perhaps you could elaborate? Pburka (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Hater

Idk why u want to delete the Mayday album off Wiki, but your lazy but needs to quit it. The album dropped Tuesday. Take ur low IQ but back to ask.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangstaaaron7 (talk • contribs) 05:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ziadie family may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

half a dozen [[Maronite Catholic]] brothers who emigrated from [[Lebanon]] in the early 1900s. {cn}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion review for Suphot Dhirakaosal

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Suphot Dhirakaosal. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Ritz-Carlton New York Central Park

hello there, thank you for your message. The reason why I redirected the NY Ritz to the St. Moritz is because they are one and the same building. Since there is no separate article for the NY Ritz, I think it makes more sense to direct to the actual building where the hotel is located, as opposed to the group article in general. Anyone wanting to find out more information about the hotel group can follow the link from the building article. Gryffindor (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Request

I would like to ask that you review and comment on this proposal on the Talk:Captain_Phillips_(film) page. Thanks - thewolfchild 19:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

You might want to comment...

...on this. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I note that you reverted one of his edits, I did the same to 38 more, which he reverted back. I have no intention of letting this person draw me into an edit war, but if you agree that his edits are mistaken, you might want to undo his action on those edits. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

This wasn't a revert. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 21:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Source Tagging

I do not understand why you just source-tagged the Fiasco (role-playing game) page. In particular I don't understand why you think the best source to demonstrate that something won a given award is something other than the website of the award itself, and I do not understand how linking to the specific episode of tabletop is anything other than the single most reliable source possible on what was done on tabletop. Neonchameleon (talk) 11:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia requires WP:secondary sources in order to demonstrate notability, and discourages the use of WP:primary sources. This article has no secondary sources; it relies entirely on primary sources. While they may be sufficient to demonstrate that something is true, they don't demonstrate that something is notable. For example, is it important that the game was mentioned in a YouTube video? If we had a secondary source talking about it we would know that it is, but all we have is the video itself. Pburka (talk) 12:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

This is a misunderstanding of primary and secondary sources on a par with saying that linking to an article in the New York Times automatically makes the New York Times article about someone into a primary source. Tabletop (web series) is a secondary source when talking about Fiasco although it would not be a secondary source when talking about itself. (It is also a notable source, although a generic youtube video would not be). The Diane Jones Awards are a secondary source on the subject of Fiasco and as such can be used to establish its notability. Neonchameleon (talk) 00:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Tabletop (web series) in a primary source when it's used to support the claim that the game was discussed on Tabletop (and it's not a reliable source, since there's no evidence of editorial oversight). The Diane Jones Awards are a primary source when used to support the claim that the game was nominated for such an award. Those sources are ok on their own, but the problem is that the article relies entirely on primary sources. If the game is notable, it should have been covered in reliable secondary sources. Pburka (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

As I say, the article is not about whether Fiasco won an award or was discussed on Tabletop. That something won almost certainly the most prestigious award in its field is itself commentary; it means that the most notable award committee thought it deserved the prize - the very reason Wikipedia prizes secondary sources. It was about Fiasco and as such to not link the Diana Jones Award directly would be using not secondary, but WP:Tertiary sources. Using another site to establish Fiasco was the winner of the Diana Jones Award would be exactly as far removed from what happened if the site was Wikipedia as if it was any other site that mentioned the game won the award. And Wikipedia is specifically cited as a tertiary source because that is what it does, with every other site at the same remove being a tertiary source by the same token (as well as by definition). As such the Diane Jones Award and Tabletop are secondary sources with respect to Fiasco itself, independent of Fiasco but providing commentary - the textbook definition of secondary sources on wikipedia. Neonchameleon (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

James A Bayard the younger

As I told the other two users, please cease undoing my edits. I am one of the cited sources ( Brion McClanahan) and know more about Bayard than 100 percent of the American population. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.134.185 (talk) 03:46, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Then I'm sure that you have access to reliable sources, and won't mind footnoting your work. An argument from authority is rarely convincing. Pburka (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. My reliable source is my dissertation, which is already cited on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.134.185 (talk) 04:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm sure that has sources you can also cite for various parts of the article. Neonchameleon (talk) 03:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited River House (New York City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Koch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Las Vegas Boneyard (Silver Slipper).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Las Vegas Boneyard (Silver Slipper).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

So what sort of list is it?

Because the editing of currencies out isnt honest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.48.62 (talk) 21:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

It's a list of major cryptocurrencies, not every cryptocurrency anyone's ever thought about implementing. If you want to add more currencies, start a discussion on the article's talk page. Pburka (talk) 21:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

To you it is. It wasnt always. Seems like this thread is being hijacked. The title of the wiki is "List of Cryptocurrencies" not "list of major cryptocurrencies" seems like you are editing something that you know nothing about. For a start, most of those details are wrong. Coinmarketcap dot com.. check it out and you will see the market cap for them all are not truthful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NataliWinehouse (talk • contribs) 21:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Ontario Mental Health Act

^[1]^[2]

This is the legal concept for a "reasonable man", a citizen not conversant in law. If you interpret the legislation differently, please share your plain meaning view.

A physician filling out a Form 1 is making a formal declaration of their belief that they have a Duty to Disclose, breaching doctor-patient confidentiality.

This is as close to sacrosanct in Canadian jurisprudence as Solicitor-Client privilege. Ask a first year law or med student. When a physician speaks of a patient to a non-medical professional not involved in the patient's care, it is a textbook example of Breach of Confidence. Form 1 is a public document.

The legality of this assessment, ostensibly performed because of a priori knowledge of parens patriae state power in the specific case of a non compos mentis individual, has not been tested in a court of competent jurisdiction.

There is no case law on this subject. This is a basic statement of the common law authority on which the examination is based. See the Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes, 4th Edition. How do you cite an entire Legal reference...that shows no guidance but for the common law before 1982 and the Constitution?

This provincial statute requirement is an attempt to satisfy Section Ten of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

This is fundamental law, re Section 52 of the Charter. I can't find the Wikipedia page I read before making the edits at the moment, I'll look, but the gist of it was 1+1=2. If you see 1+1, it's ok to say it equals 2. If you'd like to say otherwise, bring on the secondary sources. All of the edits you removed are stating 1+1=2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.40.143 (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

As for - "restore one paragraph, as it is referenced (albeit to a primary source))"

This is how the law works. Legislators write it, the courts apply and interpret. This is a published Judgement - it is law until a court of competent jurisdiction changes it. It is a current legal reference to precedence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.40.143 (talk) 03:19, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Kona Lanes

This article is "finished" from my standpoint, so I've listed it for peer review, hoping to get feedback from others who may find the subject of interest. Feel free to add your opinions if you're so inclined, with my thanks. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Need for proof reading

Your edit to Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient completely messed up the formatting of the part that you edited. It is really important when making this kind of change to proof-read the effect, and make sure that you are actually achieving what you mean to achieve. Preferably you should do this on a preview, rather than only checking after saving, so that you never post a wrong version, but one way or another it is essential to check. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Can you elaborate on what the problem is? It looked correct to me. Did it not render correctly for you? Pburka (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Going back to the state of the page after you edited it, here, what I see immediately after "The Pearson correlation can be expressed in terms of uncentered moments. Since" is a big red notice saying "Failed to parse(lexing error): μ_X=E(X), σ_X^2=E[(X-E(X))^2]=E(X^2)-E^2(X)". I can't understand how it was that you didn't see that, since this is certainly a message generated by the Wikipedia server, not by the local browser. The only possibility I can think of is that maybe you were looking at a copy of the old version of the page saved in your browser's cache, but that would be somwewhat surprising. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

It looks like my code only renders correctly with MathJax enabled (in preferences, under 'Appearance'). I'll take a look at it later to figure out why it doesn't render correctly on the server side. Thanks for pointing out the problem. By the way, do you know if the math is supposed to be rendered as σ_X² or as σ_X²? i.e. is σ squared, or X? My encoding was consistent with the former interpretation (which matches the current rendering), but I'm not sure that's correct. Pburka (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I have now enabled MathJax, and it's fine. Sorry to have suggested that it was a failure on your part to check properly, but, as you can no doubt imagine, that was the way it looked to me. (I did think it surprising, as you seem to be enough of a sensible and careful editor that I wouldn't expect you to make changes without making sure you knew what the effect was.) As for the other point, the way you did it was right; that is to say that it's σ that is squared, not x. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Arthur Edward Blanchette

Thank you for pointing me in the direction of WP:PBY.

I am developing software that analyses data in Wikipedia articles. My edits to Arthur Edward Blanchette were as a result of that software highlighting the page as containing conflicting information. ie born 1921 or 1922 but solely in the 1921 category.

At the top of WP:PBY it says that it is a guideline, best treated with common sense, occasional exceptions may apply. The section in question is regarded as ambiguous, see the talk page. The category you insist on keeping could be wrong ie why choose 1921 not 1922?

I am still of the opinion that the Arthur Edward Blanchette article is incorrectly categorised and I am saying this as someone who has spent the last six weeks studying the formats of biographical articles. However, I have a huge list of articles to correct so I will decline from engaging into any further edits on Mr Blanchette. Periglio (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Bill de Blasio

My apologies, I was going to include links to several pre-election polls, but had to step away from the puter. If I include links to the polls, can I restore that bit? HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 16:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Of course, but I suggest adding the references at the same time as the content. Pburka (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Pburka. You have new messages at Template talk:Transportation in New York City.
Message added 13:35, 24 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Epicgenius (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ray Emery.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ray Emery.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Annie Gardner Barr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Homesteader

Sibella Annie Barrington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cape Breton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Companies based in Gatineau

Hi and sorry for ignoring you. I have reinstated Category:Companies based in Gatineau by cancel the speedy deletion. I would like to apologize for ignoring you. There are three articles but now there are five articles. The five companies are based in Gatineau goes into five articles fit in the category for it's growth. I would like to say "I'm sorry" and it would never happen like this again. So if any user ask me you just talk back. So, once again the companies category is reinstated into it's eponymous Gatineau category and everything is solved. Cheers. :) Steam5 (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Steam5. No need to apologize. You don't need to monitor Wikipedia obsessively! I Pburka (talk) 23:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For looking after and improving List of lists of lists All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 21:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC).

List of lists of lists

It actually is essentially true, but that's no reason for you not to have reverted.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 12:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Admittedly, the empty list is a list of lists, but it's not true that the empty set is a member of all sets, which is, I believe, what the anon editor appeared to claim. Counterexamples: the set of non-empty sets doesn't include the empty set, nor does the set of things which are not sets. Pburka (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill de Blasio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Success Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Case McCoy

Sir,

I saw you removed the section of Case McCoy's tweets regarding the Michael Sam kissing incident.

You asked for more citations regarding the tweet.

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/2014/05/case-mccoy-tweets-displeasure-with-espns-coverage-of-michael-sam.html/

http://fansided.com/2014/05/12/dale-hansen-weighs-michael-sam-takes-great-shot-case-mccoy-texas-longhorns-video/#!MMzAE The above article has Dallas sports anchors addressing the situation.

http://www.wfaa.com/sports/Hansen-Unplugged--258847821.html

http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2014/05/foaming-over-michael-sams-draft-day-kiss-and-espn-as-deep-throat/

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/life_and_entertainment/2014/05/12/all-abuzz-athletes-tweet-mixed-reactions-to-michael-sam-kiss.html

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/10913755/2014-nfl-draft-michael-sam-drafted-st-louis-rams-seventh-round

Your statement that this is not a story is belied by the numerous reports on it. I could find more links if you would like. You say the tweet was ambiguous but these numerous respectable sports news sites respectfully disagree. Matching his tweet to the timing of the "kiss" leaves no other conclusion. Also, every person who responded to Mr. McCoy's tweet knew exactly to what he was addressing.

Can we add this to the biography?

Controversy Case McCoy issued a tweet following the draft of Michael Sam that many journalists considered a negative reaction to televising Michael Sam kissing his boyfriend on live television. At the moment of the televised kissing McCoy tweeted "ESPN...You serious right now?". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.141 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

That looks better. The ESPN and Columbus Dispatch references seems to be reliable, and the proposed wording provides good context. (As far as 'leaving no other conclusion', I think that's a stretch. IMO it was likely homophobic, but could permit alternate explanations. Some of the other athletes quoted were much less oblique in their homophobia. But that's all irrelevant as Wikipedia's role isn't to interpret.) Pburka (talk) 20:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Scops owls

Hi. Just a heads-up that Flammulated owl, Seychelles scops owl, African scops owl still need downcasing. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Looks like the flammulated wasn't in Category:Otus. The other two I just missed. Pburka (talk) 22:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asian barred owlet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It ranges across north central and northeast [[India]], [[Nepal]] [[Bhutan]], north [[Bangladesh]]) and southeast Asia ([[Myanmar]], [[Thailand]], [[Cambodia]], [[Laos]], [[Vietnam]]). Its natural [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Our Lady of Ransom School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our Lady of Ransom School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Ransom School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 16:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

PR Nightjar

I noticed that you added an NPOV tag to the article. Could you please outline your concerns on the article's talk page. Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 12:15, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that Guettarda -- I've added an explanation: Talk:Puerto Rican nightjar#NPOV. Pburka (talk) 23:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Cleanup Barnstar

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		For massive quantities of capitalization fixes in bird articles. You deserve some appreciation. SchreiberBike talk 02:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Izquierdo

Hi. :) Had no idea the reference I prv. added failed any kind of reliability criterion. The two additional references I've just added to the Elisa Izquierdo article should not fail any criteria? Regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 00:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

PS Hope I was not abrupt in reverting your edit: that info has been on the page for at least 15-18 months (from memory) until someone, rather than requesting a citation, chose to remove it as it was unreferenced.--Kieronoldham (talk) 00:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm quite cautious about original research in biographies of living people. While it is permitted to use primary sources in certain cases, I think it's best to be conservative about doing so when the information could be harmful to the person. Information about a prison term could easily be misinterpreted by an editor, so I believe it's best not to include it unless a reliable secondary source reports it. Obviously, if we are going to include such information, any source is better than no source. Pburka (talk) 01:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Real property may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Fee simple]: An estate of indefinite duration, that can be freely transferred. The most common

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi regarding the 5 Dots. I only have personal experience of it. I don't think I have ever read of it but I know quite a few ppl with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrSmithYoung (talk • contribs) 21:42, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi regarding the 5 Dots. I only have personal experience of it. I don't think I have ever read of it but I know quite a few ppl with it. MrSmithYoung (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

CD Howe

Trying to understand the rationale for not listing speakers -- why remove the examples? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmathewm (talk • contribs) 15:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

I suggest we continue this conversation on the article's talk page, where I attempted to start a discussion earlier but received no responses. Generally, Wikipedia discourages long lists within articles, and encourages WP:PROSE instead. If the list is intended to express something about the institute, then it's better to do that explicitly, and support it with secondary sources. If the list is simply intended as a directory or catalog, then it's not encyclopedic. Pburka (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Breast Binding

Thanks for your recent edit of the Breast binding article. It has been noted that sources subject to editorial oversight need to be used in future citations, even when the original material is untrue. The edit made where the use of WP:WEASEL and WP:CLAIM has been removed was reverted. (ShonaMcc (talk) 05:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC))

Request for comment on using secondary RSs at "List of scientists opposing maintream assessment of global warming"

In the most recent AFD of a particular article, you made a comment that referenced "original research" or "WP:OR". I am sending this same message to every non-IP editor who metioned either character string in that AFD. Please consider participating in a poll discussion about adding secondary RSs to the listing criteria at that talk page. Thanks for your attention. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Content for artist Ercy Mirage

Dannygeez (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC) Hello, im new to this wikipedia and im trying to figure it all out You had an issue with notability.. I have provided a substantial amount of back links and references for the subject. The accomplishments are noteable and is definitely a reputable musician, music producer, etc etc

For my own sake of learning,

How can i imporve the article or exactly what additonal information would require?

Thank you Dannygeez (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Ellen Burka

Dear Pburka, Thanks for your remarks about the PD-tagging of the image of your great-aunt Ellen Burka. I do however think that the image is PD. Dutch copyright rules apply (the photo was made in the Netherlands in or before 1943), and as this is a photo by an anonymous photographer and made >70 years ago, this photo is clearly PD (see also Wikisource Auteurswet art. 38.1). I will give more information about the case (also about the copyright of the period of WWII in NL) on the Discussion page on Commons. A related question: there are many pictures (and a Polygoon filmreel) of the IJsrevue 1948, and Ellen Burka might be in. If you are interested: http://gahetna.nl (search term: ijsrevue) Vysotsky (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Pburka, I can understand your (and your family's) motives and I am of course willing to retract the image from the Dutch Wikipedia as soon as there is another image (perhaps from the late 40s or 50s?) available. I used this early image because it was also used in a former and in a recent Dutch documentary. My apologies if I caused any harm. Vysotsky (talk) 10:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015

How to pick up more women...

Hello to the members of WikiProject Women writers! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. The proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you're interested in the talk (it does not signify you'll be attending the event). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

re: Ellen Burka photo

Hi. Please see c:User talk:Pburka#File:EllenBurka1943.JPG and User talk:Pburka/Archive 2#Ellen Burka. Can you please, please, please take a look at that & answer? Thanks! Much appreciated. With regards, Trijnstel_talk 00:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pommes Frites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backpacking. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Bond

That didn't go very well, sorry about that. I'll have to pick my questions more carefully next time. - Dank (push to talk) 14:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Not your fault. Just way more dramatic than I care for. Pburka (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Italics for series titles

Given your recent contribution to the discussion regarding James Bond, I'm letting you know about a new discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Titles § Italics for series titles seeking clarification of the MOS to avoid further confusion. Please feel free to comment there. —sroc 💬 19:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Citations in lede

As a general rule, because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Where the ref is in the body of the text, I don't see a need -- especially where the subject is not a living person. I don't think the NW article required citations in the lede, as they were clearly in the body, and agree with the editor who removed your c-needed tag. --Epeefleche (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Minimate

How an article can be merged int a redirect? I'm sorry I didn't understand the idea so I removed your template. If you are sure, please return it, but maybe with an explanation?Xx236 (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Oops. I meant merge to Minimates. That article itself is misnamed, and should be Minimate. Pburka (talk) 13:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Help with Wednesday Martin

Hello! I'm reaching out to see if you might have time to review edits I'm proposing to the entry on the writer Wednesday Martin. I'm suggesting the changes on behalf of Martin, so I don't want to make any edits myself. I noticed you're a member of WP:WMNWRITE, so I thought you might be interested in helping. Another editor and I have spent the last several months improving the body of the article, and now the focus is on cleaning up the introduction and infobox. The editor who was previously reviewing my drafts is a bit busy at the moment--would you be able to look over my latest Talk page message and let me know what you think? I also welcome any feedback you have on the rest of the article. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jessica Sweet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Sweet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Sweet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Translations of Official Names

Perhaps my text was too deterministic, there is no hard a fast rule, but it is in generally bad form to translate an official name if you can avoid it, if you do translate, translation should be in parenthesis, or you might translate and the give original name in parenthesis, I can agree to both styles. However translation of official names can often render a name unrecognizable, or simply odd. Albert Einstein is never rendered in Spanish as Alberto Einstein, the record label Deutsche Grammophon would not be recognizable if refereed to as German Records. Before editing the style entry I came across an entry on an article on Health Information Technology referring to the "German Hospital and the Hospital Italiano" in the same sentence, why not the "German Hospital and the Italian Hospital", best in this case was "Hospital Aleman and Hospital Italiano". If you search for Hospital Aleman you will go straight to the right page, if you search German Hospital, you will get a list of a multitude of hospitals. There are cases where translated names take on their own standing, such as the People's National Congress, this is particularly true of names which are officially written in another script. Yet as a general rule, avoiding translation is a good policy. The Argentine newspaper La Nacion, would never be translated to The Nation, nor would you ever list The New York Times as El Tiempo de Nueva York, or even El Times de Nueva York in Spanish Wikipedia. In an extreme case some people think that the country Colombia should be translated as Columbia, though most people see this a a spelling mistake. On the other hand we name Deutschland as Germany all the time and think nothing of it.

Would you accept then an edit that was more open? I do think this issue of name translation is important, and its a often a problem for me when I am reading both English and Spanish

this was may original edit:

Official names (of companies, organizations, or places) should not be altered. (St Thomas' Hospital should therefore not be rendered as St Thomas's Hospital, even for consistency.) Official names should not be translated (Hospital Aleman, of Buenos Aires, Argentina, should therefore not be rendered as German Hospital.) Maboitiz (talk) 17:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Maboitiz: I suggest opening a discussion on the WT:MOS page, but I think it's going to be controversial. Historically, many terms have been translated when used in English (e.g. Germany, as you pointed out or, more controversially, Myanmar). We also don't use official names in many cases (e.g. IBM vs. International Business Machines Corporation). In fact, the advice on official names may even be seen to contradict MOS:TM, which tells us to "choose the style that most closely resembles standard English, regardless of the preference of the trademark owner." Pburka (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Also, review MOS:FOREIGN, as it covers some of these cases already. Pburka (talk) 18:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

The Standard Highline

Hello, thanks for the feedback on my edit to The Standard Highline. I was not attempting to be promotional in mentioning DeSimone. They were the structural engineer on the project and it has won many awards. I have also found an outside source to attest to this: http://www.aia.org/practicing/awards/2012/architecture/thestandard/index.htm

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSheaNY (talk • contribs) 19:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I work for a PR Firm that works with DeSimone. They did not have a Wikipedia presence (as most other large engineering firms do) despite working on some of the most significant new structures in the world so I wanted to create a page for them. DeSimone is mentioned in numerous wikipedia pages, however there was no link to their won page as one had not been created. I purposely tried to not be promotional, only stating facts that could be sourced to independent sources. I am confused how adding the fact that DeSimone served as structural engineer on a project is promotional as it is extremely relevant to the structures discussed. Can you please provide some clarity on this? The DeSimone draft page i worked on is all sourced to outside sources and is purposefully not promotional. It also appears to be inline with other structual engineering firms Wikipedia pages. Can you provide some clarity on this...it is my first time editing or creating a wikipedia page!?! Thanks for your help! GSheaNY (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Broad street

the information comes from the Castello plan/map --- and index--- New Netherlands history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimmabee (talk • contribs) 03:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

maiden lane

references would be the court and land records of new Amsterdam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimmabee (talk • contribs) 03:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

@Kimmabee: You need to be more specific than that. Can you cite the specific records, preferably with a link to an on-line copy of the records? The citation needs to be specific enough that someone else can look it up and verify it. Please see WP:CITE for more information about this policy. Pburka (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

[1] Literal rule

[2] Golden rule

[1]

[2]