User talk:Sahaib/Archive 2

Hello

Lifevault — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.196.190.22 (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Sahaib3005 (talk) 10:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Darling: New & Selected Poems moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Darling: New & Selected Poems, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more substantial reviews in third-party published independent reliable sources. I've returned your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. do not move the draft yourslef , it defeats the purposeof AfC DGG ( talk ) 09:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zerkaa has been accepted

Zerkaa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I don’t think Zerkaa meets GNG

None of the sources are significant coverage of Zerkaa himself. Some of the sources are unreliable and should be removed (Metro and Dexerto for examples), so I’d advise you to check out WP:RSP before adding any more. SK2242 (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Riedy

The article Matt Riedy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page completeley fails WP:BLP, uses two sources which are not reliable, and these sources don't even show most of the information in the article, showing possible original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clearfrienda ^💬 09:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Do not re-add the tables at Matt Riedy, as they are un-sourced and don't follow WP:BLP

Please stop re-adding the tables, while the article's subject may seem somewhat notable, if there aren't any sources, then it isn't. You can't re-add the tables without citations anyway, and, this is a biography of a living person. It can be harmful to add un-soruced material which is possibly original research, and can get Wikipedia into some serious legal trouble. I'll hold off on an AFD request if you can get some more references added. Thanks, Clearfrienda ^💬 14:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

The new table you've added is fine, I've checked the source, he is mentioned. However, this does not mean the subject is notable, nor the other information is verified, as this is a mere trivial mention. You will need to add more citations to get me to hold off on AFD. Clearfrienda ^💬 14:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2021 Oxford Circus stabbing

The article 2021 Oxford Circus stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. Unless it can be shown that this incident has lasting significance, it's not clear why there should be an article on a crime incident that appears to be one-off and not linked to anything wider.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 12:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darling: New & Selected Poems has been accepted

Darling: New & Selected Poems, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clearfrienda ^💬 15:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Janet Murphy

Hi - I assume that Darft:Janet Murphy was a typo, I've moved it to Draft:Janet Murphy. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 13:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Summer Days (film)

The article Summer Days (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass. Note that it could be expanded by the German article is irrelevant as there are no usable citations in that article either. They are all just film database sites. No reviews found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

"Palau National Museum" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Palau National Museum. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 17#Palau National Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 14:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, Sahaib3005,

Before tagging any more pages for speedy deletion, please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion. There are not random reasons you can provide for deletion, there are established criteria and you need to state which criteria you are citing.

If you have questions about CSD or the Wikipedia deletion processes, take your concerns to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Red Fox and His Canoe

Hello, Sahaib3005,

Thank you for creating Red Fox and His Canoe.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references are directory entries and are not useful for establishing notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whpq}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whpq (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leopold (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luitpold.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oscar Otter.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oscar Otter.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Fox and His Canoe.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red Fox and His Canoe.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Works by Nathaniel Benchley

A tag has been placed on Category:Works by Nathaniel Benchley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:The Garden of Forking Paths (Once Upon a Time).jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Garden of Forking Paths (Once Upon a Time).jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Zerkaa

Hello! Your submission of Zerkaa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 22:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA reviews

You recently made the following GA reviews, seemingly very quickly:

• Talk:Darren Murphy/GA1
• Talk:Creighton Preparatory School/GA1
• Talk:Tom Wilson (ice hockey)/GA1
• Talk:Leonardo III Tocco/GA1
• Talk:Paul Goodman/GA1

None of these reviews properly check all of the good article criteria. They also do not provide any constructive feedback to the author (every article can always be improved).

A more typical GA review looks like this: Talk:Shashi Tharoor's Oxford Union speech/GA1. Please do not participate in the GA review process unless you are willing to check and comment on every section of the articles you are reading and to explain why or why not it matches the criteria. This takes a while (it can easily take a week). See WP:GAN/I#R1 and the rest of that page for the instructions. —Kusma (talk) 09:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

I've opened a formal discussion on this editor's GA process at Wikipedia talk:Good articles. DMacks (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)