Jump to content

User talk:Scorpion0422/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging unqualified FLCs into parent lists

[edit]

For lists that do not qualify for FLC status because they have less than ten items, I guess their items should be merged into their parent article? I don't think this has ever been done before, at least not to a parent article who passes FLC itself. For instance, since you're familiar with my university lists, I'll use those as an example. Some of the provinces don't have enough universities to qualify for FLC, so I will merge those into the parent article of List of universities in Canada. If you look at it now, it's just a list of universities with no statistics or anything. How should the page be formatted to reach FL status, especially if some of those provinces will branch off into their own List of universities in Province articles? Gary King (talk) 16:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this guy supported their own article. Gary King (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll probably have separate articles for all of the provinces, then merge back the provinces that have less than 10 universities into the main list. Gary King (talk) 16:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks a lot for the barnstar. I'm glad to know my edits are appreciated. =) TheLeftorium 18:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons Episode list

[edit]

Your edit says "experimenting", but I think the page was better the way it was. The links were more clear, and that table is not really necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.72.228 (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my reasoning. The season links were much easier to click on and read using the standard wiki table of contents. As a temporary solution, I've added the word "Season" to each number to make it easier to click on. Hopefully we can work something better out, though, because I really think the old way was easier to understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.72.228 (talk) 05:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: image

[edit]

Yes, it depicts the character (in addition to having merchandise as the subject of the work) so it wouldn't fly. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLC reviews

[edit]

I noticed that a few recently promoted FLs had some prose issues that weren't brought up during FLC. I guess I'm going to go back to reviewing as much as I can, and I'm going to start kicking ass and taking names. We'll need more prose reviewers as TRM slowly fades away (I hope he doesn't, though) so feel free to form an open invitation for that. Gary King (talk) 06:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page for centralised discussion Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 15:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see if current revisions have addressed your concern and improved the list enough to ochange your mind. The intro section was considerably revamped. Thank you very much for your time and assistance.--2008Olympian chitchatseemywork 07:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear it failed so soon! I have been extremely busy the last few days and was waiting till I had an extended period of time to read it thoroughly (I have some tomorrow). That was very fast to fail an FAC! The article improved dramatically during the FAC process and I was not expecting this outcome, certainly not so soon. I will go through it tomorrow and give as thorough a review as I can and hopefully iron out any remaining problems. Assuming all is sorted tomorrow, I will be happy to support next time. Regards and commiserations. --Jackyd101 (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When does the contest start? When can we nominate the articles for FLC? -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 03:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about if I just delete the section on Province and territories of Canada and put {{main|List of Canadian provinces and territories in order of entering Confederation}} to replace it. -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 01:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for giving me a suggestion which can make my odds of winning the contest higher. -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 02:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for bothering you so much about the FLC contest, but I was wondering if I could co-nominate a FLC for the contest. I know it could be a little advantage on the other entrants, but I hope you are willing to let me co-nominate. The reason I am asking you this question is because Arctic.gnome is still active on Wikipedia and he did more than 50 edits on the article, List of premiers of British Columbia, and it would be unfair if he doesn't get credit for his work. -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 04:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is done. Gary King (talk) 15:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FL contest

[edit]

Can I count "List of W. S. Gilbert's dramatic works" as Literature? Because we do rather need both lists, and I've been meaning to do both for a while. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.

[edit]

One problem I kind of foresee is that some lists are easier to do than others - List of transitional species, for instance, will be closer to a featured article, with lots of reasearch, whereas simpler lists might be relatively easier. How about a judges' choice award for best featured list(s) created in the contest? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 22:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, but do any of my categories now count as underrepresented? By which I mean, I don't think there are very many, if any, FLs in any of those topics, but none are on the official list, and I'm not sure if that list is prescriptive, or just examples. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, by the way, I did work on some biological topics years ago, under an old nick, but haven't in at least a year. There were some somewhat related to transitional species, but nothing very close - I was one of about 20 working on Evolution and one of two on Ediacaran biota. Is that a problem? Sorry, I just want to make sure I'm rigidly fair about this =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just remember I am, of course, one of the leading members of the Gilbert and Sullivan project, with FAs such as Thespis (opera), Creatures of Impulse and Trial by Jury. I haven't nominated any biological FLs, certainly, but... you see why I'm a little cautious here. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 23:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering who you invited to the contest. -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 22:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by regulars? -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 22:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could I switch from List of Bleach video games to List of Soul Eater chapters? Despite how the list looks, the lead needs a big rewrite (too much in-universe detail), the table needs refs and plot summaries (see List of D.Gray-man chapters, List of Claymore chapters). As such, it's needs quite a bit of work to get to FL. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr (converse) 23:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Simpsons character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Mythdon (talk) 09:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks, also. I respectfully submit that, I will retain this List of Philippines Chief Justices by time in office and I deleted the other 2 (but if the retained is not approved, then one of the other 2 articles created by me, may be instead be entered). List of Philippines Chief Justices by time in office may be patterned after List of United States Chief Justices by time in office; however, there is an existing-related Philippine article on this:Chief Justice of the Philippine Supreme Court, and maybe, before I create it, I will notify our Philippine Tambayan. And in the meantime, I will delete my submitted 2 articles in view of the rules. Cheers.--Florentino floro (talk) 06:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello!

I was wondering what is the exact time we can begin work on the articles for the contest? Is it 20:00 UTC or 00:00 UTC on the October 10th? - C4v3m4n (talk) 13:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't enough awards for an FLC. Gary King (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it up for DYK though so it should be on the main page within a week. Gary King (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that someone suggested that you used Leaving Springfield as a source. I can help you with that and have something ready by thursday or friday. --Maitch (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I just read the Leaving Springfield chapter and I can't find anything that would be useable for the article. Basically, it is an analysis, which I think goes to far to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. --Maitch (talk) 09:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laureates

[edit]

Hey Scorp. Nice work, but if had to go any particular route, I'd look at just creating a "Portrait" column and keeping the images in that? I've seen that a few times. I'd also make the country col thinner and break between multiple winners' nationalities... Hope that helps a little? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the way you have it is fine right now, although like I say, a separate column for the portrait would work too. As for the break, I mean force a linebreak between the country names of multiple winners using <br>? Let me know if I can help out... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the break thing, bingo. The flag thing, probably not. Check your potential usage with WP:MOSFLAG - I seem to recall nationality flags ought to have the country next to them too, which you could do... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons episode

[edit]

My apologies. Yes we have a bot that tags articles based on having categories at WP:CHIBOTCATS. I think there is some sort of nobots command that you can use to keep bots from tagging the talk page. Talk with User:Stepshep who runs our bot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Question

[edit]

I do not unfortunately. I would recommend User:Nihonjoe or User:Dekimasu. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FLCon Awards

[edit]

I think there should be an award for the most Supports for a list or for a trio of lists. -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 05:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be frank, that's a silly award. How many "support" !votes an article gets is irrelevant, and it varies depending on the number of reviewers available. The nominator has zero control over such a thing and it would be purely luck-based. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 06:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homer redirects

[edit]

LMFAO!! I just had to point this page out to you. The redirects people come up with for Homer. CTJF83Talk 05:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if I could have the pleasure of nominating you for adminship, and if you would accept. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 21:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never!! I shall be the one to nominate Scorpion! ;) iMatthew (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome for the offer. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 22:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scorpion would make a terrible admin! :D Gary King (talk) 00:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not the best thing to tell the man responsible for the fate of your numerous FLCs! User:Juliancolton/FacesJuliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Matthew and I will execute a coup to dispose of Scorpion once and for all! Gary King (talk) 01:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The NHL Awards FT

[edit]

Take a look at the peer review archive. It never really had a complete peer review done, so it still needs one. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It has been corrected. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Featured Article

[edit]

A few weeks ago you added a simpsons article to the request page, but I removed it to get my article up. I have readded your article to the TFA/R page since there was a spot available, and wanted to make you aware of this fact. Good luck with your request. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could use some help with production info on this one when you get a chance. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: artist award page names

[edit]
  • Sorry, i didn't think it would be a controversial or laborious issue since only a few were one way as opposed to the other. But, as you say, i will talk to the user in question. tomasz. 21:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 18:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)


Removed

[edit]

I removed you from the WikiProject Rock list of members since you clearly didn't want to be a member. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 22:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats okay, i'm not forcing you to join. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black ice

[edit]

You removed some content that I added to that article claiming that it was unsourced. If you would have looked closer you would have noticed that I have provided a reference that you should have checked. I have re added this content with more info and references-_|_- Adam (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With your edits to the artcle, I have simply added back the reference that you removed and added one sentence about black ice trucks. I hope you don't mind, and also I do not work for walmart, I don't even live in that country. I am just over enthusiastic about the band. -_|_- Adam (talk) 02:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left a couple of comments on the above peer review. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more comment. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit request

[edit]

Done. Thanks for reminding me to clear my cache...I was wondering why it didn't work. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it does the same for me now. I suspect it'll be fine if we give it several minutes, to let it catch to up to itself. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

S,P,I...

[edit]

Hmm, in this case I think we should use the source and just change it if a more reliable one comes up, as this paper seems fairly reliable in this instance. When the episode airs here, I'm sure more sources will report it, but I think we should use this for now. Gran2 18:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, hopefully we'll be able to back it up with some more sources some enough. Gran2 19:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gotta love Bill. Great job getting a seal of approval from easily one the best showrunners of all. It's nice to see that someone from the show understands and appreciates our work, unlike some other moronic jerks. It's a fantastic article, and you've done an amazing job, so well done! Gran2 16:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I think we should just leave. As you say, anti-fair use crusaders don't really listen to any argument you present, so we may as well let them go. By the way, what do you think of Phil's page so far? The death sections are a mess, but I think the career sections are taking shape. Gran2 23:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

[edit]

for that. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking about that too after I read the comment Matthew made in the Signpost about doing a sweep. I think its a great idea. I think it may be best to wait until the contest is over though. But we could definitely work on ironing out the details. Any ideas on how to implement such a task? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll think it over a bit, I have a few ideas. I'll get back to you tomorrow. And I do apologize for my decreased activity as of late. A combination of a lot of things has made it difficult to devote time to Wikipedia. Hopefully, I'll pick things up. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 04:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, I have to admit I felt a little bad delisting "popes," but then I thought "I'm not Catholic", so no biggie for me :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 04:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha, if we did that, we would just be asking for it ;) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 04:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:FLRs

[edit]

I am surprised I didn't get to reply. Anyways, the referencing issues are valid, but I still oppose the unlisting based on merging. Nergaal (talk) 00:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contest reviews?

[edit]

Are there more FLC's for the contest? I don't quite understand the table and structure on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Contest. If there are more that I can review, let me know? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 22:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that this nomination has pass ten days already. So I am wondering you could give me a little more time before closing it. This might not be fair, since you are the FL director and have to treat every nom equally by not giving special treatment to someone. But I almost address every concerns, and I just need some more time. Thanks.—Chris! ct 06:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gif

[edit]

I have done some simple gifs in Photoshop and ImageReady before so I'll probably be able to do it. I'm not sure I'll be able to finish it today though, is it OK if I send it to you tomorrow? --TheLeftorium 13:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it might look like shit, but here it is. =P If you want to, I can remove the background and/or make it slower/faster (or anything else you may want me to fix). --TheLeftorium 15:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How's this? --TheLeftorium 18:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, is this better? --TheLeftorium 20:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I'll clean it up tomorrow. I have to get some sleep now. ;) --TheLeftorium 21:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How's this? --TheLeftorium 14:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better? --TheLeftorium 15:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I'll see what I can do. ;) --TheLeftorium 15:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is (refresh your cache if needed). I didn't move the circle all the way up to the points though, that looked kind of weird (plus I like this version better). --TheLeftorium 15:49, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, thanks I guess. ;) By the way, good work on the Bart and Lisa articles! I'll probably finish Lisa's First Word today or tomorrow. --TheLeftorium 10:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update on FAC/FAR/FL closings

[edit]

See User talk:Marskell#Update on FAC/FAR/FL closings. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I notice you removed the images I added with an edit summary of "rv. Those were all removed because they have no source and/or old depreciated license tags". If you are concerned about the sources, I think that alot of the oldest pictures there are not properly sourced, and may fail fair use. This is because they claim the 70 years rule stating that the subject died >70 years ago. However this isn't the rule, I believe that it is 70 years after the "last surviving author died". The reason I added the ones I did (pre-1922) is that they appear to be rather official pictures, and would qualify under "The work was created and first published before January 1, 1923." I am no expert in this field, but just thought i'd mention it as it is a FLC, and will need considering. Sorry, to burden you with this. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 11:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

President's FLC

[edit]

You're not gonna close the FLC with the polltop/bottom templates?--SRX 17:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you did that with the FLC's too, since I see that they have the "Do not edit the contents of this page" (the FLCs that were closed). Nice new sig btw. :)--SRX 17:37, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lisa's Head.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lisa's Head.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homer Simpson

[edit]
The Simpsons (Annoyed Grunt)-star
Congratulations on getting Homer Simpson to FA! ("My Homer is not a featured article. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a featured article, but he is not a porn star!") TheLeftorium 09:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations for passing the article. It sure is good to see that one of the most popular fictional characters is FA. Regards .Tintor2 (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for that. It did take ages. I'm not worried if someone does revert, because there is always the version in the history to refer back to. I'm considering an expanded "science behind the Nobels" kind of list/articles if I can ever get my head around how to do that based on sources (the presentation speeches and Nobel Lectures may be a good source to confirm this sort of thing, and in reality, it is usually fairly easy to find other sources that say "the award was for this work". More generally, I've asked here for opinions on the three options: no links, piped links, separate column. Carcharoth (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 21:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Simpsons season 8

[edit]

Sorry - I'd missed the subsequent edits. Well reverted. Much better now in the appropriate place down-article. And entirely justified per WP:NFC. Jheald (talk) 02:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Busy for 10 to 14 days

[edit]

Hey Scorpion, starting tomorrow I will be very busy and will not be able to review nearly as many FLCs as usual. I may not be able to resume my normal reviewing pace for at least 10 days. Hopefully, I'll be able to pop in and out regularly. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzo

[edit]

Please see my last post to my talkpage. Happy with any solution you and Matthew cook up. My editing time here is for trivialities only at the moment. --Dweller (talk) 13:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The discussion at WT:PW, link.--SRX 20:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hello

[edit]

Replied to your email. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 22:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

[edit]

IRC? CTJF83Talk 17:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New color, huh :). Oh, and you're confused, I am the overlord not the other person you were talking about ;) CTJF83Talk 17:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering Julian is on an "long Wikibreak" and has already withdrawn his FAC at here, perhaps this FLC should be withdrawn at the next run, too. Gary King (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it's unfortunate. Gary King (talk) 15:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I wanted to change my entrants for the FLC Contest, you said it is disallowed. But how come Mr.crabby and Sephiroth BCR are changing their's? -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 02:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bart

[edit]

I'll try to take a look soon. Zagalejo^^^ 00:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind at all. I love The Simpsons, so it'll be refreshing to actually review an article that I know something about. I've tagged it as under review, and I'll begin tomorrow. Nikki311 04:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Snowball II Funeral.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phil

[edit]

Yeah, I sort of just stuck it there for now. I'll probably give it its own section later, once I've listened to a few commentaries. On a related note, do you think that most of the Response section (the what happened to NewsRadio and The Simpsons etc.) would be better off in the show sections? Long quote short.. "you might even say we just ate Uter and he's in our stomachs right now! [laughs] Wait...scratch that one." Gran2 15:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bart's page looks fantastic, I'd stick another free-use image in though, maybe Jim Brooks for a change? Or MJ? As for Marge, I think including the Bush letter is fine. I'm sure I read somewhere that Groening wanted Marge to have concealed rabbit eyes under her hair, or was that vandilism? "Urge to kill rising!" Gran2 16:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - Can you also update the stats for this on the talk page, Portal talk:The Simpsons/Character quote? Cirt (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Cirt (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

I humbly apologize for making any implication that you were the untrusted editor I was talking about. I was imprecise in my edit summary and should have been specific. I was in the process of cleaning up the damage made by an IP editor and it looks like I got one of the few edits he made that was correct. Again, I apologize. --NrDg 21:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw, Poland bid

[edit]

Hi there, any reason why you just summarily dismissed and deleted the whole section I research and wrote? If you wish to edit or add things please go ahead but please don't just delete it . . . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.131.187 (talk) 01:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next FLC for Contest

[edit]

So I guess I have to wait two more days before submitting my next list for the Contest? My last one was just promoted. Gary King (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For your awareness

[edit]

I've rearranged the list of D'oh participants so it is more alphabetical. Considering your a user I see prominently featured in this topic, I ask if your comfortable with this format. A talk 23:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Dispatches and Treehouse of Horror

[edit]

Hi Scorpion0422. As disucssed at this thread, SandyGeorgia thinks that the story behind how Treehouse of Horror (series) became FA'ed its presentation on the Main Page on October 31st along with other Halloween content would make a good story for the Dispatches. Since you received the FA button for Treehouse of Horror, I thought that you might be interested in writing the story for the Dispatches. -- Suntag 14:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Scorpion, User:Road Wizard has done a great job of cleaning up the List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom article and I think it may meet WP:WIAFL criteria now. You may want to revise your declaration of delist. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to know if this article is below featured list criteria, since I can't really tell. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 23:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of _____ cricketers

[edit]

I've given 4 days for WP:CRIC and others to revive 7 featured list to featured list criteria, just so you know. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 23:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This might be of your concern :)

[edit]

Talk:List of members of the WWE Hall of Fame#Tables need to be updated--SRX 03:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I responded once more to get your input on something else.--SRX 03:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since my name change and my accepted nomination of List of Vancouver SkyTrain stations, Rick Bot has kept on reverting my edit of merging K. Annoyomous24 and SRE.K.A.L.24. So I was wondering, if I can go to all of my nomination archives and change all of the K. Annoyomous24s, to SRE.K.A.L.24s. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 01:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC procedure

[edit]

Just to ensure I get this right when I archive stuff tomorrow for FLRC, I simply add the nomination to the FLRC log and GimmeBot will do the rest? — sephiroth bcr (converse) 09:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FLCon section 2

[edit]

I was wondering since my FL nomination for List of San Diego Padres Opening Day starting pitchers already has 4 Supports, and it has been over 10 days, that maybe I could also submit my third entry for the FLC contest. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 20:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O, never mind then. I thought it has been already ten days. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 00:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now, this time is for real. I was wondering since my FL nomination for List of San Diego Padres Opening Day starting pitchers already has 4 Supports, and it has been over 10 days, that maybe I could also submit my third entry for the FLC contest. (copied) -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 00:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relief!!

[edit]

Not sure if you had to deal with any of these users, but they are now all blocked as socks!! I'm happy!! lol CTJF83Talk 04:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Championship lists

[edit]

Remember how I proposed at WT:PW the new table for the lists, well I did the first one, List of World Heavyweight Champions (WWE), but then I thought about adding the venue, or is that not needed?--SRX 18:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay and your welcome! I'm just trying to help out backlogs and make sure that FLC's meet the FL criteria.--SRX 18:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am expressing my doubts of your abilities of editing and judgement

[edit]

Then ignorance is your bigger flaw. Consider this as a critisizm rather than outright attack. And be a man and respond to my talk page. Reverting is just plain stupid, but it is your call and your page, not mine. Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am finishing each post with regards. Is this not telling you that I am still respectful? Are you so self centred?

Finishing a post with "regards" does not by any means make it civil. Even if you don't consider your posts to be an attack, criticism of a particular editor is not allowed, and may result in a block. In your previous post, you called Scorpion "ignorant" and "stupid", which is clearly uncivil. Please stop. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sucking up to the FLC director, are we? ;) iMatthew 21:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More so defending our principles. If you can't act civilly to other editors, then don't bother interacting with them or contributing. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 21:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that makes you unexperienced user, not bad user. I am not attacking you. You threatened me with blocking, remember? How did you expect me to react when you are threatening me with block. And then you just reverted your talk page and deleted my answer. Do you regard your behaviour as honourable? I am not attacking you, I am critisizing your behaviour. There is sheer difference between attack and critique. I am not attacking anybody, I am expressing my doubts of your abilities of editing and judgement. I am and will remain respectful. My behaviour is unchanged. Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk) 21:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone "extremely childish" hardly speaks well of your so-called constructive criticism. Your comments aren't constructive criticism; if anything, your comments veer more towards the "childish" comments you are accusing Scorpion of. Being on Wikipedia longer than Scorpion means nothing. Your perceptions that he is "inexperienced" because he had an opposite view in a merge discussion is baseless, and speaks more to your lack of understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You are not being respectful, and this is what other users have been calling you out on. If your behavior does not change, then blocks for incivility may be appropriate. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 22:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ok, I am backing off. I will not appologize, because I don't regard myself as wrong. The issue isn't worth it. People are keener on attacking me rather than constructively present their view and keener on threatening me with block rather than explain their behaviour. I am backing off. If you can think of it as a battle - you win. Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I already presented my view on the differences and the bureaucratic stuff behind the Wikipedia. And what did I get - block threat. Glamourous. The Mad Hatter (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you got a warning because you were posting personal attacks, not because of your views. -- Scorpion0422 00:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?snrub rM tohs ohw

[edit]

I am indeed a massive fan of Twin Peaks, and that section is 100% accurate. Darrenhusted (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amusing

[edit]

[2] How did I miss the Neo-Rhino party? Risker (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 15:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

that was fast! I was going through some of my todo list and I noticed that the page is quite ready for GAN, but that nobody seems to have edited it lately. My opinion is that it is ready for GAN, but you might be planning to go directly for FAC or something like that. Regardless, since I did not actually work on the article, feel free to do whatever you prefer. Nergaal (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Simpson men.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Simpson men.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Simpson women.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Simpson women.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bart

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Mos#Italics (Words as words) or Use–mention distinction. Zagalejo^^^ 22:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of cricketers

[edit]

I was wondering if you can look through these lists and tell me whether or not these should be nominated for WP:FLRC. Thanks. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 01:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did leave a message (well 8 messages) for WT:CRIC, but they so far only improved the one with the FLRC, List of Namibian ODI cricketers. I'm going to tell them about the 3 lists you suggested are way below the WP:FL?. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 01:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe List of Asian XI ODI cricketers currently satisfies the criteria, and List of Australian Twenty20 International cricketers and List of Scottish ODI cricketers have significantly improved and are now up to date and have more developed leads. However, I do agree that the others are not in a state that satisfies WP:FL?. Nev1 (talk) 02:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sortability

[edit]

The FLC I'm referring to is #4: Structure. It is easy to navigate, and includes—where helpful—section headings and table sort facilities. As I mentioned in my comments, I recognize that I'm outside consensus, but it truly is my belief that the lists should be sortable. It didn't stop the promotion :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLCon

[edit]

Thanks. =) I look forward to the third featured list contest (or whatever else you and Matthew dream up). Or perhaps in my new position as the FLRC director, I can host a contest to get former featured lists to FL status. Thoughts? — sephiroth bcr (converse) 20:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's the discretion of the contestants. If they pick a hard list, then it's their fault for picking the list. To this end, I could include awards for difficult lists. It would be nice to turn this into a "FFL cleanup drive" in that sense. I'll work up something. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to notify you on one of the rules, rule 2 states, "you must wait 12 days until you can nominate the next list (even if the first one is promoted after 10)", though most of the entrants (including me) nominated their second nomination right after the first one ended, without waiting 12 days. How should we resolve this? -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 21:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this okay to be a list in order to nominate at FLC, or is the main article doing the same job?--TRUCO 02:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just wanted to make sure, so should I redirect it to the main article, as well should List of Royal Rumble winners be redirected?--TRUCO 02:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Maggie Makes Three

[edit]

You can do "And Maggie Makes Three", I don't mind. =) TheLeftorium 15:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I just nominated Bart's Girlfriend. Season seven sounds good too me, although there's not that much Flanders in it. ;) Also, nice work on Mona Simpson! --TheLeftorium 19:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Glenn_Close.jpg. 'Twas already uploaded. Gran2 19:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either one is fine with me. I will bring this discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Simpsons. --TheLeftorium 19:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:C-skiner.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:C-skiner.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picking on me

[edit]

Im tryin too be a cool wikiwriter & yor being a bad writer & cuz yor canceled my work on the simpsons movie.Pleese no picking on me.Eddie Wood (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Twila Tanner

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Twila Tanner, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twila Tanner (2nd nomination). Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 01:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing the Oppose will be discounted? :) Gary King (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Nobel Laureates FT

[edit]

Yeah, I've been looking at a featured topic like that for a while. My main issue has been how to format List of Nobel Laureates, and I think your format looks pretty desirable. I've been swamped by work for college for a while, but I should be free around Wednesday-Thursday and beyond next week, so I'll start working on the lists then. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 20:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I intend to revert your redirect of Morris Trophy and to create the Coulter Award articles. I see no reason why these articles cannot co-exist with the Vanier Cup article and permits expansion and explanation of the award, its history, and the person for whom they are named. The awards are noted in news coverage of the game and on rosters of players who go on to the CFL and there also several websites who keep lists of the winners, so meeting the WP:N guidelines to meet WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR is not an issue. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't see any reason to remove the info from Vanier Cup. It is good context. There's just more that can be added to the individual articles in time. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd really like to have the histories of the awards and background I've already added and add photos, details of the trophies themselves, and any notable stories about the selections. I really treasure the featured status of the Vanier Cup article and fear radical changes to it. I wonder how much can be added before it's no longer a list but rather an article and then if it would still be featured quality so I hesitated to add the information there. Do you think merging the facts I added to the Vanier Cup article could be added to a new section about "Individual awards" and not endanger the featured status? DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would definitely like to continue to add info but I agree that it can fit at Vanier for now if you're confident it doesn't affect the FL status. I'm glad that someone like you, who I believe is familiar with FL requirements, is watching the article and hope you'll let me know if I do anything that risks its status. Cheers, DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 23:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AfD nomination of List of bands whose members are all deceased

[edit]

No need to take offense, I was just commenting on your statement that, "Why not "List of films where all cast members are deceased" or "List of congress' where all members are deceased"?" We can agree that it should be deleted because its nonnotable, and that's all that matters. Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend? 18:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Snowball I.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Snowball I.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 11:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Bling Bling

[edit]
King of Pop Award — For getting an article within the scope of the Michael Jackson WikiProject to GA
A little overdue, the Jackson Wikiproject thanks you for getting Stark Raving Dad to GA class. Well done. — Realist2 00:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can certainly try and find some info yes, I have connections outside of Wikipedia that could potentially locate reliable sources on Jackson's input. I'm very busy in the Wikiworld at the moment, but give me another reminder closer to your FAC and I will get researching. Cheers :-) — Realist2 00:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:List of countries

[edit]

Yeah, I'll probably close it in a week. The speedy closing criteria looks good. A nice line would be:

Nominations may be closed earlier than the allotted two weeks if in the judgment of the FLRC directors, the list in the nomination:

  • has a clear consensus to merge or redirect to another article or list;[Note] or
  • has a clear copyright violation and removal of the copyrighted material would severely decrease the quality of the list; or
  • has a clear consensus to be delisted and no significant efforts have been made to improve the list.

Note for the first item would say that: "This consensus may be shown in Articles for deletion, a discussion on the article's talk page, a discussion on the relevant WikiProject(s), or other community venues that present a tangible consensus to merge or redirect the article." Cases in which the merge/redirect are brought up during the FLRC would ideally fall under criteria #3 if it was clearcut.

Thoughts? — sephiroth bcr (converse) 10:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Funeral for a fiend.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Funeral for a fiend.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Season 6

[edit]

Oh, I didn't know you wanted to do that one. I just picked one from the bunch so you should do it. In fact, I have already given it to you. ;) TheLeftorium 16:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done And yes, I will search in environmentalist organization websites. --TheLeftorium 17:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that sounds cool. The Itchy & Scratchy Show would be fun to get to GA status. I'll add it to my to-do list. --TheLeftorium 21:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure that would be great. Cirt (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Simpsons production info for a few articles

[edit]

If you've got time could you help me beef up the Production section for a few Simpsons articles I'm working on, because I don't have access to the DVDs? Specifically, Two Dozen and One Greyhounds, The Day the Violence Died, and Bart the Mother. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 18:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finding Reception is hard enough as it is. Strangely enough, most of what I found was from the Toronto Star. Gary King (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bart the Mother needs a screenshot. Which part of the episode do you think should the screenshot show? Gary King (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article has an image now. What are you working on recently? Simpsons family GT? Gary King (talk) 19:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hm User:Arctic.gnome is probably a better bet for that kind of stuff. Gary King (talk) 20:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

[edit]
The RfA Barnstar
Scorpion0422, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to Stwalkerster and Pedro for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ANI and AN to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the non-free content criteria and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply ask at my talk page and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) The Helpful One 22:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

Re:WP:PW

[edit]

It's okay, I understand where you are coming from, in the past, I was against you archiving those discussions, but now I'm with you. I will archive the second one if nothing comes out of it, lets try a restart.--TRUCO 02:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of current Canadian senators

[edit]

I've put some recommendations on the talk page, but overall it's quite good. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 03:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried out adding a column for images. Do you know how to adjust it so that in instances with more than one recipient, the images are aligned side-by-side instead of one after the other vertically? Cirt (talk) 07:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will just pick one picture per line. Cirt (talk) 12:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I'm really sorry. I will make my best efforts to get to it tonight but if for some reason I still haven't managed it by friday then by all means go ahead and nominate it and I'll leave any further comments here during the FAC process so they don't disrupt proceedings. Again, very sorry to have taken so long.--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bart

[edit]

I like the second paragraph of "Role". I have some concerns about the first, though. I'm not crazy about including Bart's backstory at all, because of the show's inconsistent continuity. However, the Homer article passed with a similar section, so I'm not sure if it's worth worrying about.

One thing you might want to check is the tense in the article. When you're writing about fiction, you're supposed to use the present tense. However, the article sometimes slips into the past when describing events on the show.

Is Jackyd101 going to offer more comments at the article's talk page? It seems like s/he was planning to add something. You might want to hold off on the FAC until all that is settled. Zagalejo^^^ 08:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, there's a comment about that above. :)

Friends

[edit]

Thanks for your hard work finding the articles, they'll improve the page to no end (it's amazing what passed for a Good episode article 18 months ago). It doesn't matter that they're all quite negative; it makes for more interesting reading to see how critics originally reacted to what became one of the most successful US sitcoms ever. Bradley0110 (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I nominated this list to AFD, but this is a wrong solution, then, go to the Matthewedwards talk page, and if possible close this AFD because he is having problems, and I prefer not bother him. I hope that you has understood all. Cannibaloki 17:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought you were an administrator. I think that best is leave the time pass... Anyway, thanks for your attention. Cannibaloki 18:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:IIHF World Championship Gold Medal.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 18:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Scorpion0422/Archive 12's Day!

[edit]

User:Scorpion0422/Archive 12 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Scorpion0422/Archive 12's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Scorpion0422/Archive 12!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:EVula/Userboxes/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.RlevseTalk 01:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AC/DC

[edit]

Thanks! Unfortunately I wasn't able to get a good shot of Phil Rudd from where I was at, the stage was too high up for me to angle my camera correctly. I did get a few pictures but it seems like he didn't have enough light shining on him.

I was hoping for the band to take a bow at the end for a shot of all 5 but no such luck. I may be going to another show in January so we'll see what happens there. Weatherman90 (talk) 01:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did get a picture of the Rosie balloon - do you think I should upload it? I don't have any shots of those pairings you mentioned, in fact I can't remember Angus standing next to Malcolm or Cliff for very long at all, it seemed like he was always running around. A 3 guitar jam would have made a great picture but the way the show seems to focus almost all of the attention on Angus and Brian. I suppose they are the stars of the band but it would have been cool to see Malcolm & Cliff up closer to the crowd. Weatherman90 (talk) 01:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the barnstar! I just uploaded the Rosie picture and I also managed to find a decent picture of Phil Rudd as well. Go ahead and make any changes as to the placement of the Rosie image, you might have a better idea as to where it should go since you're a long time contributor to AC/DC articles. Weatherman90 (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know the poem and the episode are different things, but the latter is a fairly close retelling of the former, and it ought to be linked somehow. How about a link to The Raven in popular culture#Television? — sjorford++ 17:16, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fair point - in fact the first column links to the episode page itself, which in turn links to The Raven - I'd barely even registered that because the I link is so squiddly. i'm trying to think of a way to make that more visible, since that column contains the most important links in the list. — sjorford++ 17:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our old friend

[edit]

Dammit. I'll keep my eye out. What really annoys me is that he's British! Ah well, good luck with Bart's FAC. I read through it at lunch today, at it looks really good. Gran2 17:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Day the Violence Died

[edit]

Nice; now, finding Reception for that particular episode is more difficult than the other two episodes I'm working on. Got some good starting points? Gary King (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have access to LexisNexis, which I searched and didn't come up with anything useful, but regarding Newsbank, did you get access to that through school? I don't think I can get to that. I also already looked through EW and IGN. The rest I'll check out. Gary King (talk) 19:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What "FAC" means? Anyways, I DID ask to release it under CC and in reply they send the photo. You can see the quote fromy the permission email (after my question about CC). Hope this helps. --Zureks (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've added a lead and other cleanup. Any objection to nominating it now (mentioning both of us as co-noms naturally)? As for List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates (should it be "Nobel Peace Prize Laureates"?), I don't know what to do. In the university laureate lists, I put their occupation/what they did that's in their profile. Thoughts? — sephiroth bcr (converse) 23:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good solution. I'll leave it to you to do the Peace Prize list. As long as the rationale column gives why they received the award, it should be fine. In any case, I've nominated List of Nobel Laureates here. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 00:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[3] Gary King (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Scorpion, I remember that you stated that you wanted to nominate the above FL for FLRC, but I just revamped it completely to meet WP:WIAFL. I hope it meets it in your eyes to remain as an FL. Thanks.--TruCo 21:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Keeler

[edit]

(Responding to your entry on my talk page) My argument for notability goes as follows: Keeler has (apparently) mentioned the "theory" on multiple DVD commentaries; it seems clearly to have some bearing on the large number of "underpants" references in Futurama; and -- most significantly -- it's mentioned as an example at inherently funny word. Unless you think I'm not making my case well, I'll restore. But I'm still puzzled why the admin felt it had to be reverted.76.94.45.139 (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Schultz

[edit]

Dear Scorpion (name?) Not sure the basis for your edits. I do understand about Wiki policy on promotion etc. But I feel that my article was well within the boundaries. I was in the process of adding sources - but everything that was written was created by my staff over the years as a way of informing the press and others about my experience. It is all well documented in journals and other sources. I get email from folks asking about these things and thought that Wikipedia would be a good place to collate and memorialize the information. I think you went to far - but I am interested in your point of view on better formats and further use of Wiki - your input as to appropriateness would be great. Pictures of me? Yes I have them -- holding emmys with all the other folks at the award show etc... Bill —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.149.129.225 (talkcontribs) 18:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was a good start, but I felt some of the wording was the kind of stuff that should be avoided. You can readd what you like, but a lot of the article focused completely on the positives, which should also be avoided. If some of the statements can be backed in reliable third party sources, then by all means, please add citations. As for images, any you could add would be most welcome. -- Scorpion0422 19:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. I'm afraid that sources written by your staff probably do not fall into the category of reliable, independent and verifiable sources. It should be specifically independent sources that verify your contribution and notability. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and a collection of neutral content that may benefit the wider public, and is not necessarily a place to collate information for your clients or patrons. I think Scorpion0422's actions were correct in this instance. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE TO PeterSymonds

As a producer of the Simpsons and many years in the animation industry - I am constantly being asked how I got where I am - and the details of my various associations and interactions within the animation business. Why is that information not appropriate to Wiki pedia -- At what point must a statement be supported by additional specific sitings? There is nothing in the article that has not been printed in other magazines, interviews and books. How can this information be made available to Wikipedias wide audience?

Is it appropriate for wikipedia? Yes. But, it should be written by an uninvolved party. Per WP:COI#How to avoid COI edits, you should avoid "Editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved." Perhaps you should consider starting your own website. -- Scorpion0422 20:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the article missing besides an expanded lead? Gary King (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I search for reviews I normally search for the exact episode name; that should bring up DVD reviews that mention the episode, too, I believe? Gary King (talk) 22:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homer and Lisa Exchange Cross Words

[edit]

Cool, thanks! :) I'll nominate it now. --TheLeftorium 15:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say no too. It's probably just a one-time joke that won't be mentioned anymore. --TheLeftorium 15:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary King (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLC needs to be moved

[edit]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1995 to Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1993, 1994 and 1995. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for FL, about 8 days ago. Four users reviewed it, and all of them decided to suport it. Does it need to saty as a candidate for a little more time, or it can be passed already? Just curious.  Rockk3r Spit it Out! 04:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. Don't worry I understand, I was just curious you know. Well, have a nice day.  Rockk3r Spit it Out! 04:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bart - Macys.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bart - Macys.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:I'm Bart Simpson, who the hell are you?.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:I'm Bart Simpson, who the hell are you?.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

[edit]

Please check your email inbox. Thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Interview

[edit]

Yea! I'd love to do the interview. I'll be really busy for the next two weeks at school, but after then I'm wide open to do it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of current Canadian senators

[edit]

I don't think that there is a stability issue. If a bunch of senators are added in a few weeks, it will be big news and someone will add it to the article, and since it's pretty clear who has been appointed to the Senate, I doubt there would be any conflict over the edits. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 01:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Review: Marge Simpson

[edit]

Hi! I'm currently reviewing the article you nominated for GAN, Marge Simpson. I don't have a lot on the review page right now, but I thought you'd like to know that the review is in progress. My remarks can be found here. Happy editing! ~SunDragon34 (talk) 02:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Itchy & Scratchy.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Itchy & Scratchy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FL barnstar

[edit]

There is still some interest in this FL icon? I created one in grayscale, with the images X & Y. Would you like to see? Cannibaloki 05:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my sandbox. =) Cannibaloki 13:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Interview

[edit]

Sure. Do you just want me to do the questionnaire? If so, I'll do it when I have some time. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 05:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to, same questions as above? Do you want me to fill them out? Regards. Woody (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay sure Gary King (talk) 19:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Well I have no idea how long you've been apart or associated with the pro wrestling project, but that does not matter. I've come to say hi and nice to meet you, so that we can become acquainted with one another. Maybe even become good online friends. My name is William and I've seen you around every once in a while and noticed that you were apart of the pro wrestling project and thought it was about time to introduce myself. So, how have you been today? Also for future reference I can become an asshole so if I am being one then just call me out on it and I'll quit, most of the time I do not know I'm being one. :)--WillC 08:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Why is that? Do you watch TNA much?--WillC 21:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quickie suggestion regarding Wikipedia:FCDW/WBFLN

[edit]

Instead of "How does the FLC process differ from the FAC process?" which sounds like you're asking for a technical description of the differences, you might get a better reply if you personalise it slightly by asking "How do you feel the FLC process differs from the FAC process?" I think this comes closer to asking the question you originally intended (how is it better/worse). All the best, Steve TC 22:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, dude

[edit]

This is not a joke. What is going on? J.delanoygabsadds 02:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TNA

[edit]

Okay, do you watch TNA much?--WillC 02:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When was the last time you watched them? It has gotten pretty interesting lately. Have you seen any of their ppvs?--WillC 02:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lockdown was also my first TNA ppv. I deeply enjoyed the event. That is why I expanded it and now have it at FAC. I can give you a link to few other ppvs by TNA you will probably like. I've seen all their events since Destination X 08. I still think Lockdown 08 is their best one but I've probably seen it too many times to count.--WillC 03:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Left my responses to the questions there. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr (converse) 09:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the reference to a somewhat similiar 1975 Australian dispute. There are only a handful of incidents in the Commonwealth in the last century, and this is perhaps the most important. It has nothing to do with the Australian situation being a coalition, and everything to do with it being a similiar impasse, where the Governor General had to make a decision. Nfitz (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure here about some things here, and I have a few questions:

Whadda you think? ayematthew 00:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you know, I've blocked this user, in hope that they'll actually reply to me. I don't think this sort of clear-cutting is justified, I've yet to find anything saying this is a process to follow. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on my proposed structure here? This would use the countries given in the Nobel Laureates pages as the basis for the list and use the same disclaimer you have for List of Nobel Laureates in Chemistry. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sortability wasn't really worth it. The category sort basically makes the list the equivalent of List of Nobel Laureates, making it redundant. And yeah, I know this is going to be ridiculously long. No real way around it. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Park "Trapped in the Closet" credits are John Smith

[edit]

If you watch the episode, all credits are listed as John Smith and Jane Smith. That is how it is listed. Not vandalism, that is correct.

Also, fun fact, pseudonym are listed on wikipedia. Check out the entry for any movie directed by Alan Smithee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.187.154.49 (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 17:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Friends' Ambulance Unit‎

[edit]

Thanks for your correction to the FAU article. Vernon White . . . Talk 19:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nobel prize pics

[edit]

The images i was adding, for example this one, Image:Ducommun.jpg, have public domain tags on them because their copyright has expired therefore are allowed to be added to the article. ----GreatestrowereverTalk Page 20:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bart peer review

[edit]

Sorry I didn't follow up on my feedback back I'm a bit too busy now. Good luck with the FAC anyway. BUC (talk) 22:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:FL barnstar

[edit]

Looks good. You will show to the other users? Cannibaloki 23:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, an approved work. =D Cannibaloki 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ignatieff

[edit]

Just so you know, I've page-protected the article for three days so that our anon friend can't jump the gun on this. Bearcat (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Interview

[edit]

Greetings! I've been writing for the Signpost lately, and I recently interviewed Ruslik0 of Wikiproject Solar System. Would you like to be interviewed regarding Wikiproject The Simpsons? You appear to be the best person to interview - you've made the most edits to the project page, the most edits to the talk page, and you've written dozens of episode GAs.

If you're interested, just let me know either here or on my talk page. I'll walk you through the whole process from there. Thanks! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 18:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grr, I searched the Signpost archives for "simpson" and all that came up was one passing reference to the project and lots of hits for Ashlee Simpson-related discussions. I assumed that an interview on this wikiproject hadn't been done before. Thanks for the heads up. I'll try to find another wikiproject. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 20:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolute seems very well qualified to represent the project, and it would definitely be nice to hear from the sports world for a change. If he doesn't want to do it, I'll try the others that you suggested. Thanks again! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you speedy close this when GimmeBot's next work day rolls around? I can't since it's a COI, and Dweller is apparently still on break. Argument presented is obviously complete nonsense, so this should be pretty uncontroversial. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 09:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Nominator withdrew the nomination, so I archived it, as it was uncontroversial at that point. Thanks in any case, — sephiroth bcr (converse) 09:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Cage

[edit]

It has been a known fact from Kurt Angle that Christian Cage might be jumping ships from what he has been hearing from someone in WWE on "LIVE" edition of "Impact!". But yet you keep on removing it from the site, Why? Also, he hasn't been seen from on "LIVE" Impact! or in an Impact! ring ever since that attack, and on top of that his contract is up sometime in December of '08. So if all of this is true why remove anything that I have been contributing?

Hey, could you take a look at "Summer of 4 Ft. 2" before I nominate it? Also, let me know when you have some time over to see if there's anything useful in the Mickey Rooney chapter in Nancy's book, as the DVD commentary barely mentioned him. Cheers, TheLeftorium 15:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources, verifications of what I am saying

[edit]

Listen to me I have watched November 13, 2008's edition of Impact stating once Christian Cage's contract expires sometime next month according to Kurt Angle that he has heard that he might be jumping ship from the locker room of TNA from what they have heard by someone in WWE or Kurt has heard that news directly from someone in the WWE. So news flash I am stating something that was on Live Telivision that should be a reliable source now shouldn't it? If not what is classified as a reliable source a newspaper article or what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexystudd2010 (talkcontribs) 16:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reverting by vandalism now. He has appeared to be ignoring guidelines and warnings. I'm considering it vandalism now.WillC 00:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I was just considering it vandalism because you've warned him, I've warned him, and others have. I've talked to him over e-mail and he still continues.WillC 00:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I manually archived and promoted the list late last night. Sorry for not doing it sooner, but I still haven't been around much. :/ Hope all is well with you. Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 07:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was no big deal. Best, Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 16:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Simpsons Hit & Run

[edit]

Doesn't really look relevant? Looks like mostly Hulk-related stuff. Hit & Run is mentioned only once at the very bottom. Gary King (talk) 21:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the CTV reference could be useful if it claimed those things, but from what I can see, it says that Hulk was won through a bidding process. No mention of Simpsons through the same process. Gary King (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not reliable, but "Simpsons XXII" could be useful to search for a reliable source. And ah, that quote is so hidden away, didn't see it. Gotcha. Gary King (talk) 21:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think that quote refers to the rights of Road Rage, as that is mentioned earlier. Gary King (talk) 21:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, if I put my edits back into the article, it's considered reverting, but when you delete my changes over and over again, it's not?

[edit]

So, if I put my edits back into the article, it's considered reverting, but when you delete my changes over and over again, it's not?Tj terrorible1 (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Signpost interview

[edit]

I answered the questions on Wikipedia:FCDW/WBFLN, just to let you know. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I answered most of them. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I did them. Thanks for choosing me for the interview! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying "boo" or "booerns"? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed it. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explosions

[edit]

Why are you removing the info about explosion in the Simpsons ? Gnevin (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it's happened at least twice a season .Riots and Prank calls are hardly unique to the Simpsons Gnevin (talk) 00:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prehaps you could add them to the article Gnevin (talk) 00:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IDK if you know this

[edit]

But Rollbacking edits are for vandalism only! You've used your rollback rights for good faith edits recently on these occasions

Now, I'm not listing them all, because that would take forever. I'm just bringing this to your attention. Now please don't take this the wrong way, I'm just bringing this to your attention like I'm sure you'd want me to so you can be your full potential here on Wikipedia. Have a great day. SteelersFan-94 06:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't, I saw one of your edits on my watchlist and I looked at your recent edits. SteelersFan-94 20:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 10:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

You're Correct

[edit]

Yeah it was me, Cool-Dude Tim. But I don't vandalize anymore. If you do something for me (reply) then I'll talk to you about all this. I'd like it if you made a page for only us two to talk on, and not this page.Sharp Kid (talk) 20:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Scorpio, that's very kind of you. If possible please can you ask Gran2 to talk to me. Thanks.Sharp Kid (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See what I have recently written to Gran2 on his talk page.Sharp Kid (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Describe More

[edit]

I couldn't see an option "E-Mail this user" on the left hand side. Please describe in smaller pieces. Sharp Kid (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Sorry, Scorpio, when I clicked on the link, it said the following: You must be logged in and have a valid authenticated e-mail address in your preferences to send e-mail to other users. If it will take a long time Scorpion, then I'll just talk to you and Gran2 on both your user pages. Thanks for trying to help me though.Sharp Kid (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup notice

[edit]

The 2009 WikiCup will begin on January 1, 2009. The first round will run through March 31, 2009. For more information on this tournament, read the "about" section on the main WikiCup page.

This year, we have a different system in calculating points. At User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions, you will find information about submitting your article (and other) work to earn points. Each contestant will have their own individual subpage for submitting completed work to us.

This year, User:ST47 will also be running one of his bots to calculate mainspace edits and read your submission subpages to calculate the point values you receive based on our scoring chart.

Questions or comment? Ask at the talk page or go directly to Garden or IMatthew's talk page. Good luck and Happy Holidays! -- ayematthew and Garden. 13:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why haven't you archive the FLC nominations which have consensus to be or not to be promoted? -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 spell my name backwards on 01:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been out all day doing last-minute Xmas shopping and just got home. Are you taking care of this or would you like me to do it? Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 02:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NP. I'll get on it. Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 02:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have A...

[edit]

Have a Merry Christmas, Scorpion--Sharp Kid (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons season 20.

[edit]

My apologizes, I hadn't realized the "'" after Burns to make it "Burns'". --HELLØ ŦHERE 00:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

[edit]

Hey, I know that season 11 isn't part of any ongoing topic drive, but when you get a chance do you think you could work up some Production info for this article? Thank you, Cirt (talk) 08:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you I will look into that. As for the Production stuff - no rush - anything you can do will be appreciated. Cirt (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to crack open Nancy Cartwright's book for this episode? It's season 10, but, it only needs you for a brief moment! Lefty suggested I ping you. Gary King (talk) 16:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Format References

[edit]

Would much appreciate it if you could show me how to cite the references properly and automatically. GoldDragon (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CM Punk atheism

[edit]

Talk:CM Punk/Archive 1#Nice Try is the last time it came up I think, I haven't done any work lately but I could go around looking for more if I have time. –– Lid(Talk) 00:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question for FL nomination

[edit]

Hi there,

My self with a group of other editors have been working hardly in a set of articles that we would like to promote to FL (and potentially the whole thing to a featured topic). We managed to promote one, Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium); but when we started to work on the nomination of the others (specifically Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Austria)), somebody claimed that there are too many non-free images on them. We have since then prepared for nomination the countries Austria, Finland, Malta, Cyprus, Greece, Slovenia and Monaco; while we continue to work on the other countries.

The question is, what is your opinion, as director of the FL committee, about lists that have different non-free but properly fair-use images intrinsic in the character of the list? The images are not there to make the article look good, they are the core existence of the article and without the images the article itself makes no sense. Can you please take a quick look at Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Austria) for example and tell me if it is worth to send it for nomination?

If you agree I would love to start nominating the ones that are ready.

Many thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 10:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify one of your comments?

[edit]

Can you clarify a comment you made here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 59#Okay, new proposal for the tables on championship lists. Were you talking about all referees or just the normal referees? Special guest referees are not common (obviously) and are relevant since they often factor into the match result and thus the title change. At SummerSlam (1997) for example, Shawn Michaels was the guest referee for the WWF Championship match between The Undertaker and Bret Hart. Michaels and Hart were in a feud at the time, Hart vowed to never wrestle in the United States again if he lost and Michaels would never be allowed to wrestle again in the US if he didn't call the match down the middle. At the end of the match Hart spit in Michaels face, Michaels grabbed a chair (that Hart had brought in) and swung it trying to hit Hart. Hart ducked and Michaels hit the Undertaker. Hart covered Undertake and Michaels had no choice but to count the fall and award the title to Hart. This would lead to Michaels turning heel and forming D-Generation X. So the referee in this match was very relevant and should obviously be noted in the title history page.

So while I agree that who the normal ref is isn't important, aren't guess referees notable enough to include in the title list pages? TJ Spyke 01:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! You "reviewed" this Olympics page for GA status over a year ago (see this archive), but the main issue was that the games had not even occurred yet. So that I don't have to go through the formal GAC process of listing the article on the GAC page, I'm asking you if you'd like to review it again, given the changed circumstances. If not, I'd list it like all other GACs. I just thought I'd give you the opportunity. Jared (t)16:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]