User talk:Steven a91

Welcome!

Hello, Steven a91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

West Indies

Hi Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advance changes to GBBO and Extra Slice

I have reverted all your changes to GBBO and Extra Slice. We make changes once the new version begins, but do not remove the history with the BBC. Please avoid making edits that are factually inaccurate: Prue Leith has never appeared on Extra Slice, and we have no idea whether she will. Regardless, Mary and Paul appeared on the BBC version, and that remains in the article. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 18:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts

Hi. Are you related to Steven a68?—Bagumba (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba: yes. Think I created two accounts accidentally

You are using both of them to edit, which is sometimes allowed in the cases outlined at WP:VALIDALT. If so, you generally should identify that the accounts are related. Otherwise, I'd suggest picking one of the accounts to use going forward, and retiring the other one.—Bagumba (talk) 08:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not have a need for an alternate account, could you place Template:Alternative user on the account you will no longer be using? Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 08:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know how to do this. Sorry Thanks.—Steven a91 (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC

Looks like you figured it out. Thanks!—Bagumba (talk) 06:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts

Please remember to sign your posts using four tildes e.g. ~~~~. You've forgotten a couple of times at Talk:NFL International Series. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Steven a91. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm TheMightyPeanut. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Bulls squad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Observer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World cup competition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vitality Blast

Please see Talk:Twenty20 Cup and the Cricket WikiProject talk page for a discussion regarding the naming of English cricket competitions and a proposed merger of the Vitality Blast page which you recently boldly moved. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

100 ball cricket

Hi,

I have created a page on 100 ball cricket. This should entail all the details around the 100 ball cricket, which ECB is planning to introduce in 2020. As you are a huge cricket fan, I request you to review this page and keep updating it as and when you find it necessary.

Thanks and Regards, Vikram Maingi (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol Bears

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Template:Bristol Rugby squad a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Template:Bristol Bears squad. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 14:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Royal London One-Day Cup

Hi,

I see that you have done a lot of updates on 2018 Royal London One-Day Cup page. Appreciate your efforts. Request you to please continue to do the same.

Thanks and Regards, Vikram Maingi (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steven,

Just another request to update a few scores, stats etc on this page.

Thanks,

Vikram Maingi (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 English Premiership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Humphreys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Women's Cricket Super League

Hi,

I have just created a new page, 2018 Women's Cricket Super League. Can I request you to keep following the page and make necessary updates whenever required.

Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Tamil Nadu Premier League

Hi,

I have created another page, 2018 Tamil Nadu Premier League. Can I request you to keep following the page and make necessary updates whenever required. As of now updates in the Fixtures and Results section is on delayed path.

Thanks,

Vikram Maingi (talk) 17:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, English cricket team in West Indies in 2018–19

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, English cricket team in West Indies in 2018–19. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – English cricket team in the West Indies in 2018–19. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at English cricket team in the West Indies in 2018–19. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JTtheOG (talk) 19:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Wembley Stadium, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Waitrose, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Waitrose. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding unsourced detail now. David J Johnson (talk) 15:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how I can source uniform updates? The current section is completely unsourced....

Firstly sign any "contribution" you may make in the usual way. What you have written needs confirmed sources and not your own thoughts/views. You are correct the whole section needs references, but that is no excuse for adding further unsourced changes. David J Johnson (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uniform guidelines have been updated. This is not my personal thoughts/views its fact. Steven a91 (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then source it..... David J Johnson (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Waitrose shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. David J Johnson (talk) 16:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Please stop moving articles without wp:consensus otherwise I will have you blocked. –Davey2010^Talk 23:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wembley Stadium, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Steven a91. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steven a91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 10.102.65.26

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. That IP address is not blocked. If you still cannot edit, please copy and paste the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2019

Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Super Bowl LVI, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do you have a citation for that alleged date change? ViperSnake151 Talk 17:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Bills roster

I reverted your changes, they broke pages which transcluded that roster. Tarl N. (discuss) 15:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Premiership Rugby Sevens Series moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Premiership Rugby Sevens Series, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2023 NFL Draft moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 NFL Draft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied text from 2019 Rugby World Cup to 2023 Rugby World Cup (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 Premiership Rugby Sevens Series has been accepted

2019 Premiership Rugby Sevens Series, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2023 NFL Draft concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2023 NFL Draft, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Eagles247. Your recent edit to the page Tom Brady appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Call of the Wild (2020 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 NFL Draft

Hello, Steven a91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 NFL Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your recent editing history at The Falcon and the Winter Soldier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XFL

There is a difference between "suspending operations" and "ceasing operations". At the moment, it appears the XFL has only "suspended" operations, meaning there is still a chance they will resume at some point. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rock 'n' Roller Coaster Starring Aerosmith, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tigers players

Please do not remove players from the squad listing until they are confirmed. Currently there is press speculation but no confirmation. noq (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still unsourced - remember WP:verifiable W:reliable sources. Not speculation. noq (talk) 20:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St Andrew's and Cov

Hello. Your wording implies that Coventry's use of St Andrew's is continuing. Do you have any reliable, i.e. official club, source for that? because if not, we'd do better just recording the facts as they've happened so far rather than guessing what's going to happen next season. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

West Indian cricket team in England in 2020

Hi. Please note that the scorecard is only updated at the end of each session and/or innings, and not for each rain delay. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redskins name

Please stop removing the name "Redskins" from articles associated with them. As of now, they are still the Redskins. only (talk) 15:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 European Rugby Champions Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blair Cowan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands (Regional) League

I reverted your edit to this article. You changed the opening sentence of the section to indicate that it now reflected the 2020-21 divisional line-ups, but then only changed the name of one team's home stadium. As there will clearly be teams moving between divisions, this rendered the opening sentence inaccurate. Please update the entire divisional constitution if it is now available, otherwise please wait until it is. Thanks! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maks van Dyk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2020–21 Premiership Rugby transfers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brendan Macken.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm CurtNeiMeng. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, V Festival, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curt ^内蒙 21:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Obi2canibe. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Value-added tax in the United Kingdom, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2020–21 European Rugby Champions Cup has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Bmf 051 (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 NFL Draft

Hello, Steven a91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 NFL Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your posts

You use four twiddles on the end, ~~~~ that will add your nickname, date, time. It's very helpful really! Cheers. Govvy (talk) 09:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. Also please remember to include a supporting citation with all content that you add. Thank you,— Diannaa (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Europa League attendance

Hi. We do not report a limited number for attendance. We report the whole source after matches are played.--Island92 (talk) 23:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Child (Star Wars). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leijurv (talk) 23:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers) (England) Regulations 2020, you may be blocked from editing. MichaelMaggs (talk) 00:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers) (England) Regulations 2020. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers) (England) Regulations 2020

Where are you getting the tier 4 rules from? The regulations haven't been published yet, so far as I can tell. And it can't be assumed that the guidelines will be the same as the legally-enforceable regs. There are usually significant differences. I'm concerned that you are making sweeping changes to the text thereby invalidating many of the existing citations which you seem to be leaving untouched. I would recommend that you stop until the new regs are published and can be cited correctly. MichaelMaggs (talk) 00:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP! You are making large numbers of unsourced edits, and where you have included sources they are cut and pasted from earlier regulations, and are simply wrong. I need to get some sleep now, but have to say that most of your edits will most likely need to be reverted in the morning. MichaelMaggs (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Can I also iterate the same comments. Please don't update the tables on this article until the regulations have been published and please stop uploading unsourced information. Where an announcement has been made but the law has not yet been published a sentence in the 'Current local authority areas within each tier' to state the proposed changes is all that should be included until the regulations have actually been published and the information can be properly sourced.Tracland (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

How many times and in how many ways do you have to be told that Gibraltar has not acceded to the Schengen Agreement. It is not a member yet. It has not even applied yet. There is not even a draft treaty yet. There is not even de-facto provisional operation, as per the cite in the article, passports are required at the border. Please stop this wp:disruptive editing, you are on the limit of WP:3RR. If you don't understand, please use the article talk page. You have evidently been an editor long enough to know all this. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steven, please stop reverting here. Feel free to start a discussion on the talk page of the article to see where we can find consensus. But this is not the way forward. L.tak (talk) 15:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.,

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Just stop. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Maynard Friedman, Oh dear, not again. I gave this editor a final warning two days ago for exactly the same reason in connection with repeated unsourced edits to The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers) (England) Regulations 2020. The editor has been around for a long time, and this behaviour appears deliberate, and not due to inexperience. A report to ANI or similar seems called for. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. All my edits have since been cited. I will be more careful in the future about posting before a citation is available as that is what has caused a large number of these reversions Steven a91 (talk) 19:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the sources you cited didn't actually say what you claimed they said. When three different editors tell you you've gotten it wrong, it is past time to stop and think about what is being said.

Please read WP:BRD and WP: NOTNEWS.

If you get into another scrape like this, you are not likely to be given three warnings before you get a minimum 24 hour block that will redouble on each offence. So when you feel the blood rising, go away and make a cup of tea. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers) (England) Regulations 2020. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_edits_by_User:Steven_a91 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles, templates or other publicly visible pages, to draft articles, as you did to Template:2021–22 Premiership Rugby Table. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lions (rugby union), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emirates.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021–22 European Rugby Champions Cup

Hello, Steven a91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021–22 European Rugby Champions Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021–22 European Rugby Champions Cup

Hello, Steven a91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021–22 European Rugby Champions Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2021–22 Premiership Rugby Cup Table

Template:2021–22 Premiership Rugby Cup Table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Thanks for contributing to the article John Lewis Partnership. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the London Bridge Task Force

Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent death of Elizabeth II, so I wanted to invite to the WikiProject of Current Events new task force The London Bridge Task Force, which will be working on improving all the articles around the death of Elizabeth II. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, which is where you can communicate with other editors who all have the same goal, which is improving all the articles around a specific topic. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 18:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth II. Sundayclose (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Swan upping, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. In 2006 & 2010 we had a queen, not a king. - David Biddulph (talk) 11:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2020–21 European Rugby Challenge Cup last 16 table

Template:2020–21 European Rugby Challenge Cup last 16 table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"101 Dalmatians (upcoming musical)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 101 Dalmatians (upcoming musical) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 5 § 101 Dalmatians (upcoming musical) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros. Discovery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TNT Sports.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2018 Vitality Blast North Division

Template:2018 Vitality Blast North Division has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Danners430 (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]