User talk:TJMSmith/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Invitation to participate in study
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 20:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I've nominated this article that you accepted for deletion. It is a blatant piece of advertising that deserved to be deleted for G11 rather than being accepted. -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- User:Primefac deleted the unsourced text and the puff pieces, and I don't think there is a need for deletion anymore, so I speedy closed it as keep. -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
use refill instead of linkrot
If you look at the documentation for the template Linkrot, you'll find in the section "How to use"
Before adding this template, please head over to toollabs:refill, paste into the text box the name of the page with bare references, then click the "Fix page" button.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/ fixes all the problems automatically, so better to do that than post a pointless tag. Dream Focus 12:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello TJMSmith, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
- As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
- Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar:
. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 
, 
, 
, 
. - Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Spinning Bees has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Morey has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Barbara Ruszczyc edit
Hi Ths,
I understand what you are saying about the flag. Some senior editors have removed it when I have included a flag, some have said its ok. I got the idea from other biographies, and I enjoy a bit of color in the infobox. Not the best reason for having it!
The nationality issue, I am a bit confused. Most senior editors I know use Nationality in their infoboxes, even when they can determine place of birth. That is why I started including it. It is redundant information in my biographies, as I list nationality in the first sentence. It makes sense to not include it in future infoboxes. thanks for the input. MauraWen (talk) 21:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Request on 10:05:37, 24 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Trivenishankar
Trivenishankar 10:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, My article on Anasuya Shankar keeps getting reverted back to its original, when actually we've included much more information. She passed away in 1963 so we have used everything there is now. We have her late husband's original documents detailing her life, as well as some books that we have referred to that are not on the internet. We have included comprehensive information and original photos, which were in his documents. Could you please let us know what else to fix so that it stops getting reverted back to it's older form?
Thank you.
Trivenishankar 10:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)TrivenishankarTrivenishankar 10:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Ways to improve List of people from the Northern Mariana Islands
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Thsmi002, thanks for creating List of people from the Northern Mariana Islands!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources per WP:SourceList.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Trevor Engelson
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Trevor Engelson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Natureium (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Ashani Weeraratna) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ashani Weeraratna, Thsmi002!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting and worthwhile article.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you!
I love that you come around and help with categories. I find them frustrating and never named what I would look for, i.e. Naturalized American citizens of Cuban descent, Naturalized Cuban-Americans...throws hands up and hopes someone comes along to fix it ;). I really do appreciate the help and think that sometimes these gnoming tasks go unnoticed. I recognize them and am grateful. SusunW (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- SusunW, Thank you :) I appreciate the message! I love reading the articles you write and enjoy doing anything I can to help. They are always so well written and thorough. Thsmi002 (talk) 22:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! I don't start writing until I have figured out if I can find enough sources to write a fairly good comprehensive biography. In the case of Cosme, there was an Oxford Bio on her, so I started out thinking it would be easy. Unfortunately, it had a bunch of gaps in the data. Imagine my surprise at learning of her archive and then being so lucky to have had a scholar or three actually go through them. She was pretty amazing! I really do enjoy learning about the people I write about ;) SusunW (talk) 22:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello TJMSmith, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Please Create Pages for Goucher Alumni Paula Stern & Bradford Shellhammer
Hi Thsmi002,
Fellow Goucher alumnus here. I noticed that you've done a really excellent job creating comprehensive Wiki pages for numerous individuals associated with Goucher. I hope you will consider applying your talents to create pages for notable Goucher alumni Paula Stern (former chair of the U.S. International Trade Commission) and Bradford Shellhammer (founder of a well-known venture called Fab.com which was once valued at several hundred million). Neither of these deserving (I believe both satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines) individuals have their own Wiki pages as of yet.
Thank you, and if you are willing to take this on, please let me know if there's anything I can do to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor19920 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Wikieditor19920: Hi there. Thanks for the message, it's nice to see another Goucher person on here. I wrote an article on Bradford Shellhammer! He has had a very interesting career! Thsmi002 (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 | Hello, TJMSmith. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Nancy Marcus at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk (talk) 05:17, 3 August 2018 (UTC) |
- I'm moving the discussion to your page, so that if/when you need to find this discussion, it will be in your archives. (I have searched for the discussion on my first GA and cannot find it, so I am guessing it was on someone else's page--frustrating ;) )
I have looked the article over and think that it could be expanded for GA if you can find sourcing. I will be honest, scientists are very difficult to do. Most of the articles one finds in free space are by them, not about them. Typically, I find the best sourcing is in an obit for their discipline. I'm going to advise you as I was advised and trust me, I needed a lot of encouragement and handholding, so if there is something you are confused about or seems overwhelming just let me know and I'll try to help. It may also help to read this review Ferrari as many of the points made here are relevant.
Dr. Blofeld and Montanabw were my mentors in GA. They said the article should be at about 15,000 bytes of text before final editing. That seemed really daunting to me. But the goal is to make the article as comprehensive as possible. In this case, there are a lot of places to expand.
- 1) Lede is too short, should be a summary of all material in the body. No more than 3-4 paragraphs.
- 2) Combine Early life and education into one section.
- 3) She was at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution for 9 years. You have two sentences here. What did she research, who did she work with? Where was her fieldwork conducted? What was the significance of her work? [1], [2], [3]
- 4) She was president of ASLO, what did she accomplish during her term? This can be used as a potential expansion point to give you ideas but since it is by her, it is not a RS.[4] Did ASLO or Oceanography publish an obit for her? As professional orgs/journals, they might have more detail on her career accomplishments.
- 5) Much of her career has been in administration, i.e. director of Florida State University Marine Laboratory, coordinator of the University's National Sea Grant, Council of Graduate Schools Board of Directors, Dean of the Graduate School, what policies did she implement? What were her areas of focus? There are a lot of little tid-bits I find, but you'd need to find better sourcing for some of them.[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]
- 6) If you can get it in the neighborhood of 15,000 bytes, ping someone you trust to edit it. GOCE prose is often choppy and not smooth flowing, IMO. I used to have Dr. Blofeld do the edits, now I mostly ask Ian.
- 7) Be sure that all of your citations are as complete as possible and that you have confirmed that they are RS. You can use a few primary sources but the bulk should be from independent, curated/edited sources.
- 8) They will want photos. Be sure they are properly licensed. I am a failure at visuals and often have to ask for help. You can also ask for help or collaborators at Women in Green.
I hope I have not overwhelmed you (that is definitely the feeling I had when Dr. B and Montanabw suggested I take an article to GA status the first time). SusunW (talk) 18:07, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- @SusunW:Thank you so much for your thoughtful and detailed response. I apologize for the delay in replying. I finally got around to working on the article! I'm still not sure if it quite reaches GA but I think it may be close. I know everyone is busy but I am wondering if you or maybe @Megalibrarygirl: and @Ipigott: could give it a look over/ce. Thank you! Thsmi002 (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Michael Hendricks
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Michael Hendricks has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:38, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Review Comment
Hi the Draft:Susan_Mikula has been in the review stage for almost two weeks. Is that normal??? How long until the review is over?? Thank you.JC7V-constructive zone 20:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to Chrissymad, who marked it as under review. Primefac (talk) 22:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you!
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your edits on the Goucher College page and putting together Bradford Shellhammer. Keep it coming! Wikieditor19920 (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lily Mabura has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thsmi002 (talk) 22:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello TJMSmith, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
- Project news
- The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
- As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
- There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.
- Other
- A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
- Moving to Draft and Page Mover
- Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
- If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
- Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
- The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
- The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
|---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I just created a page for Otto Kraushaar, Goucher's 7th president. He's also a doctorate-holder: would you be able to provide sourced information about his thesis and/or doctoral advisor, as you did on Marvin Banks Perry Jr.? Thanks! Wikieditor19920 (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Wikieditor19920: Hello! I added the title of his dissertation, but the record is not online, so I couldn't see who his advisor was. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Otto Kraushaar (disambiguation)
Hey there! I noticed you had created Otto Kraushaar (disambiguation). I just thought I would let you know that the disambiguation is likely unnecessary, per WP:Disambiguation#Deciding to disambiguate; in particular, the line The page at Michael Dobbs is about the primary topic, and there is only one other use. The other use is linked directly using a hatnote; no disambiguation page is needed., which is the case here. There is currently only one other use for Otto Kraushaar, which is the musician. Therefore, there's no reason to have a disambiguation page - all you would have to do is replace {{Other people}} with {{for|the musician|Otto Kraushaar (musician)}} on the Otto Kraushaar page and {{for|the academic|Otto Kraushaar}} on the musician's page. I just thought I would send you a personal message, rather than go straight to the PROD. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, --SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 14:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- @SkyGazer 512: Thank you for the explanation! I switched over to the {{for}} template. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Mint (album)
Hi, earlier I tagged you in an edit summary on Mint (album) when I retargeted it to Mint as I felt it was too generic a title as there have been other albums titled Mint in music history. To paraphrase, I said "please make sure the information is listed in the article you're pointing the redirect to". Afterwards, I saw you actually did add information relating to the album on Alice Merton's article, but pointed the redirect specifically to the Discography section, where the only mention was next to the single "Why So Serious". I just felt it would have been more helpful to list it at the top of the discography section (as all albums take precedence before all other types of releases). Ss112 08:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
| For starting the page on Helena Chmura Kraemer. Sagecandor (talk) 19:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC) |
@Sagecandor: Thank you! :) Thsmi002 (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
{WIR-91} template
Thank you for today restoring the {WIR-91} template to Talk:Christine Blasey Ford, with your edit summary, "I have been editing this page." On Sept. 17, you first added that template with the edit summary, "rate, {WIR-91}"—which I found inscrutable. I then deleted it with the edit summary, "Remove {WIR-91} template, which creates false impression this article was created or improved as part of edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red project, and by inexperienced editors. Correlation ≠ causation."
I am relieved to find that you are not one of the new editors about whom the template cautions, having been editing Wikipedia since Oct. 2017. I commend your contributions, and in particular your 16 edits (4.35% of the total) on Christine Blasey Ford.
Please permit me, however, to offer a suggestion. When first adding the {WIR-91} template to an article's talk page, it might reassure other editors to know (via your edit summary) that you are not claiming the article for Women in Red as if it were a group effort by project members, and that you are not a new editor.
Thanks for this opportunity to express my opinion. KalHolmann (talk) 04:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for you assistance in the approval of the Anna Wong (artist) page!
Jaggitha (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Turley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the category creation of Category:Books by Mark Judge
Thank you very much for the category creation of Category:Books by Mark Judge.
Great initiative and thank you for creating the category !!!
Sagecandor (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Rawlings has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Gpkp (u • t • c) 13:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Elaine Mason listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Elaine Mason. Since you had some involvement with the Elaine Mason redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 19:03, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
|
Hello TJMSmith, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Sin Querer Queriendo) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sin Querer Queriendo, Thsmi002!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your new article on the song "Sin Querer Queriendo".
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Deletion sorting
Thank you again. For deletion sorting there is the clever script User:Enterprisey/delsort, which I warmly recommend. Any questions, just WP:PING me. Best, Sam Sailor 16:57, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Sam Sailor: Hi! Thanks for the message. I've never used a script before and am a little unsure how to paste it correctly. I got the message "Warning: Unrecoverable syntax error. (NaN% scanned)." Not sure what that means. Any thoughts? Thank you! Thsmi002 (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- YW. I can't recall why MediaWiki (the software) returns that warning, just say "Ignore" and save. Sam Sailor 17:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ah! Remove the colon in :importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); // Backlink: User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js .... ah, sorted already! :-) No : in front of
importScript. Sam Sailor 17:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)- @Sam Sailor: Ok! This is what I see: importScript( 'User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort.js' ); // Backlink: [[User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort.js]] Can't tell how to use it though. Thsmi002 (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- As with anything procedural on Wikipedia, it seems very confusing at first. User:Enterprisey/delsort really gives you the overview. We sort AFD discussions in (a) broad categories, see Category:AfD debates and (b) more specific lists, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Flat. Sam Sailor 17:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- But do not feel obliged to sort, it was only because I saw you delsorted a discussion manually. :-) Sam Sailor 17:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Sam Sailor: Ok! This is what I see: importScript( 'User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort.js' ); // Backlink: [[User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort.js]] Can't tell how to use it though. Thsmi002 (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
@Sam Sailor: fantastic! I just used it once and it worked great :) this will make it much easier! Thsmi002 (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- (If you find that indentation gets too deep, use
{{outdent}}. Have a look in edit mode. I just substituted{{od|::::}}for your single colon.) On topic: TBO, I didn't even know we had a list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions that you sorted into in Special:Diff/865392684. There's always something to learn here! :-) Sam Sailor 18:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Bullar has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thsmi002 (talk) 19:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)A cup of coffee for you!
|
It was nice to meet you at meta:WikiConference North America/2018.
We have several overlapping interests but among them, I and some others are looking ahead to 2021 to write a history of LGBT+ engagement in Wikipedia. Some related projects which we do regularly are some World AIDS Day events around this time of year (for 1 December) and a summer Wiki Loves Pride push. Unrelated to that - you said that you had some familiarity with a database of grants or sponsorship related to research. If you have a small sample dataset then I would like to see it. I and some others are building out wiki-integration for connecting Wikipedia to research institutes, to their researchers, to their publications, to the research projects in those publications, to the sponsors. The base of this project is in meta:WikiCite but matching research to biographies is an entirely Wikipedia thing to do. If you have a lead on data then I would appreciate whatever you can share. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you for creating F(l)ag Football!Zigzig20s (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC) |
- +1 ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Copying licensed material requires attribution
In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for James M. Anderson (scientist). Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Kailee Morgue listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kailee Morgue. Since you had some involvement with the Kailee Morgue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 TT me 21:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello TJMSmith,
- Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
- Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
- If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
- We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
- With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Categories relating to religion
You might now be aware of WP:BLPCAT: "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources." Doug Weller talk 11:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Thsmi002. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nancy Marcus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nancy Marcus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nancy Marcus
The article Nancy Marcus you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Nancy Marcus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
|
The Good Article Barnstar | |
| Hey, congrats on your first GA: Nancy Marcus! I hope you have more articles to nominate in the future. Enjoy the barnstar, you deserve it. MX (✉ • ✎) 04:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC) |
- +1 -- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)