User talk:TheLongTone/Archive 3
Speedy deletion nomination of My Fantastic Failures ( Novel / Fiction Book ) _------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hi longnote
Regarding the yanmar marine page. I just started writing today. I will correct any promotional content. Monday 22 of june.
I just wanted to explain this manufacturer because volvo penta is also on it and I believe Yanmar marine should also be mentioned. Volvo penta is the marine side of volvo corporation like yanmar marine is for yanmar.
Is there any way you could cancel your delete request. And postpone it a week. Just give me some time.
Thanks
Steven036 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven036 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Thelongtone,
Its about an upcoming book nothing related to any promotion. Our reader are asking for a page so we created for it. See my name is already listed at Wikipedia for --- zero waste fashion designer . if we need any publicity we would have first rater created that page not this one, I hope you understand. I strongly believe it should not be deleted.
Regards Siddhartha Upadhyaya
Deletion of Young Lady (Song By Kid Cudi)[edit]
Hi there! Please explain to me why a collaboration by two notable artists makes for a non-notable song especially as the song fuses two wholly different genres and is backed up with a background story by one of the artists. As for now I see no reason not to undo your edit. Thank you. Orangetengo (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy blanking[edit]
It's not "silly", courtesy blanking is a thing we do when deletion debates and other internal workings cause upset to real people in the real world. Everything you want to see is still in the history. This is not controversial. Guy (Help!) 12:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, only I've never seen it done & I don't see anything offensive in the afd debate.TheLongTone (talk) 12:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. There's an OTRS ticket 2014012210016753 which refers. You can always ask me why I blank a debate page, I will share as much as I can without violating confidentiality. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 12:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- what does "OTRS ticket 2014012210016753" mean?TheLongTone (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I naturally assumed that an old hand like you would know, and didn't want to patronise you. See WP:OTRS. If you have a clean record and an interest, more volunteers are always welcome. It's sometimes tricky, sometimes frantic, sometimes dull, but usually interesting. Guy (Help!) 22:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I'm sensible enough for that, but I'll ponder. If I was truly a wise old hand I would have checked you out before reverting the edit!TheLongTone (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I naturally assumed that an old hand like you would know, and didn't want to patronise you. See WP:OTRS. If you have a clean record and an interest, more volunteers are always welcome. It's sometimes tricky, sometimes frantic, sometimes dull, but usually interesting. Guy (Help!) 22:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- what does "OTRS ticket 2014012210016753" mean?TheLongTone (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. There's an OTRS ticket 2014012210016753 which refers. You can always ask me why I blank a debate page, I will share as much as I can without violating confidentiality. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 12:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
AfD, SCP et all[edit]
You might want to edit the nominations, your sig is being spaced to a new line and I thought for a moment that you were nominating yourself for deletion. Which would not be a good thing. htom (talk) 05:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you marked Dirtbag Gaming for deletion and that the newcomer panicked and deleted the template. Newcomers is not my expertise of Wikipedia, so I was wondering if you could handle the situation and explain it to the newcomer. Thanks, --Bananasoldier (talk) 17:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, somebody else already deleted it. Thank you for your time. Bananasoldier (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, by the time I saw the notice it was gone.TheLongTone (talk) 17:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
An Astrologer's Day[edit]
Assuming nobody else has suggested that the article be deleted or merged before you read this, please consider withdrawing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Astrologer's Day. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: PlayGroundOnline[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of PlayGroundOnline, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi i just wounder why you consider human rights work as illegal promotion while its a must to promote human right around the world also it's a big experience and the world shall know about it. Jehad.jaghoub (talk) 15:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you![edit]
|
Thanks for the help and advice January 19, 2014 on my deleted wiki entry. Mark v1.0 (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
FROM Itsrandomtime (talk)[edit]
SPI[edit]
Hey, I wanted to let you know I opened up an SPI page for the Far Forest accounts. I don't know if this is socking or meating, but I thought that you could probably offer some additional insights into this since you had more exposure to the accounts in question. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShellyO773) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
The Village School (London)[edit]
Hi, I removed your speedy from The Village School (London), as educational institutions aren't eligible for A7 speedy: see WP:A7. Thanks, Ruby Murray 11:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- My mistake, I thought that this only applied to secondary schools.TheLongTone (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
speedy[edit]
As reviewing administrator, I removed your speedy from FirstCity Financial and changed it to prod-- tho the consensus seems to be that banks like this aren't notable, speedy requires only a rational claim to significance, and it is rational for someone to think that a bank of NASDAQ might be significant for an encyclopedia
I also remved the speedy on Ankita Makwana[ for the same reason. The combination of things is enough that someone might reasonably think it worth an article.
Please remember that passing a7 requires only an indication of significance , which is much less than notability. This is true even if it is very likely that the article will inevitably be deleted. DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Next Swiss federal election listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Swiss federal election. Since you had some involvement with the Next Swiss federal election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheLongTone (talk) 12:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
RAAF Museum Bristol Boxkite Photographs[edit]
Hi, I was hoping to get your advice on the RAAF Museum page where I had added some photographs of the replica Bristol Boxkite.
File:Bristol Boxkite Centenary Flight at Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 (1).jpg File:Bristol Boxkite Centenary Flight at Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 (2).jpg
and started a talk page to get a consensus following the removal by one editor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RAAF_Museum
Your advce would be appreciated
Hpeterswald (talk) 10:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- They are really nice photos but I'm afraid I agree that only one is necessary.TheLongTone (talk) 11:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hybrid airship[edit]
Thank you for helping out. The new editor is insisting on painting their criticisms as "Engineering considerations" and absolute fact. I am in danger of being drawn into a personal edit war. I don't know if you feel up to reviewing the ping-pong match over the associated section title and content, and let me know how you think this should be handled, I would much appreciate it if you could. Feel free to come down against me if you think I am going wrong. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'll do what I can. Many of the edits seem pretty sensible to me...the more I learn about airships the dafter they seem...but the editor clearly doesn't understand that views must be properly cited.TheLongTone (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- What more concerns me is the one-sidedness - the editor will brook no NPOV and demands that their criticisms be presented as the only valid engineering considerations. I have started a new discussion on that specific point. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agree, have commented to that effect on the talk page.TheLongTone (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Just seen the anti-LTA rant offered to you on their talk page. I am intrigued to see this from someone who, in this post, claims to have worked for a company that, according to this edit, was set up to sell Metal-clad airships but that subsequently collapsed. Love metal, hate LTA. The logical conclusion is that all that metal wasn't so LTA after all.
— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Just seen the anti-LTA rant offered to you on their talk page. I am intrigued to see this from someone who, in this post, claims to have worked for a company that, according to this edit, was set up to sell Metal-clad airships but that subsequently collapsed. Love metal, hate LTA. The logical conclusion is that all that metal wasn't so LTA after all.
- Whetever their level of knowledge, they have no ides how to go about editing. And for somebody who claims 30 years engineering experience, they are very much the drama queen. Funny, I encountered a similar editor a while back who had performed a huge number of edits on the airship article, basically completely restructuring the history in a very unhelpful way & not leaving edit summaries. I left a couple of polite notes on his talkpage but he carried on & when I got fed up & wholesale reverted he did a similar flouncing off in a huff act. Some people just don't get it.TheLongTone (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why does the word "sockpuppet" spring to mind? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Whetever their level of knowledge, they have no ides how to go about editing. And for somebody who claims 30 years engineering experience, they are very much the drama queen. Funny, I encountered a similar editor a while back who had performed a huge number of edits on the airship article, basically completely restructuring the history in a very unhelpful way & not leaving edit summaries. I left a couple of polite notes on his talkpage but he carried on & when I got fed up & wholesale reverted he did a similar flouncing off in a huff act. Some people just don't get it.TheLongTone (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I know what you mean, but a characteristic of this editor was that they left no edit summaries Over a seriies of c.150 edits. Claimed to be an airship pilot.TheLongTone (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Regarding article - Hammerhead USV-T[edit]
Why did you edit the page even after I posted an ''{{inuse}}'' already?? It's sole purpose is to avoid an edit conflict! You only did a very minor change while I was in it for a major copy-edit. In the mean time, I'd cleaned up and re-organized the article, divided in sections and also did manage to more-than-double the page content in addition to adding half a dozen references. And as I went up to save it, The page has undergone changes .. avoid edit-conflict. What? How? I posted...! It took me over half-an-hour to manage this, but was ruined because of a minor cleanup, so in vain. Starting from scratch for one more time now. Abhinav (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, just wanted to be able to read the text. FYI, if this happens again you can copy your edits & repaste them into the article.TheLongTone (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Can't do it. After you click the 'save page', the page is reloaded and renewed with the current content. No use in going back as all the changes have gone away. There has to be something to copy from.. :). Only way out is if you manage to write out the article again.Abhinav (talk) 19:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- You should get a message warning you of an edit conflict, at which point you can scroll down to the bottom where you'll find a window with your edits in it. And sorry again, it's happened to me & it's infuriating, the only excuse I can offer is that a lot of ediors put up th inuse tag and are in fact not editing.TheLongTone (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
White Shield[edit]
Funnily enough, saw it in a massive Tesco Extra the other day. I think Morrisons, Sainsbury's and Waitrose may stock it. Lovely and light beer. Nice hops. Farrtj (talk) 00:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Pedantic Whinge (continued)[edit]
Hey man, I'm quite new to being a member of Wikipedia, so just bear with me if this is inappropriate.
Disregarding my rant towards your abuse of language, (which was kind of unneeded, given that I am the one in the wrong, here,) I would really like you to remove the page about that book, if possible. I've read through the rules and guidelines of article deletion, and noticed that there is a mention of a seven-day interval between announcement of deletion and the actual deletion itself. Is it possible, if I ask you as the sole editor of the page, that you can wipe the page completely? (I have a compulsive need for closure, don't ask about it.)
If my behaviour seems somewhat ambivalent to you, don't take it personally. I like drama and giving people a hard time :)
PS. If you read through the plot summary, what did you think of it?BTirbaoqlis (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- I can't delete it (I'm not an admin)...if you really want it gone you, as page creator, can replace the prod template with the csd-u1 template (ie csd-u1 enclosed in double curly brackets {{. Cant simply write the code here , since it causes problems). Or you can simply blank the page & I (or sombody else) can speedy-delete tag it. altho I As to the plot...not really my cup of meat, but a) I'm no literary critic and b) even if I was, I very much doubt whether my taste is much in line with the reading publics'. Has the book actually been written, btw?TheLongTone (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- The book has been written, yes. It is just not so popular, to be honest. You can imagine why, I assume... but the page is deleted now, so I'm fine. Have a good one.BTirbaoqlis (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I declined the speedy - your tag was correct but the authors added enough assertions of importance to void the A7. Not sure if the subject meets WP:POLITICIAN or even GNG, so an AFD might be appropriate. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank You for the Insight[edit]
While adding tags I was thinking the same. Thank You for mentioning. Lets's keep the good work.--J Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 13:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- HSwMS Neptun (1980) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Baltic
- Siena synagogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Neoclassical
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Cronkurleigh[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification of deletion discussion[edit]
A deletion discussion which you took part in, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Williams (Character), has been reopened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Williams due to the article in question being recreated under a slightly different title. G S Palmer (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Cartozoology for deletion[edit]
Hello TheLongTone,
I came across the page Cartozoology today, and saw that you had previously proposed it for deletion and said "Probable copyvio, since most google (sic) hits have same text, but since the origin may have been on a non copyright (sic) site (I) am not going down that route."
I pasted the article in quotes into a search engine, and found that it was an exact match of the text at the top of this page. Per WP:COPYPASTE, if a website makes no mention of its copyright status, the material is assumed to be fully copyrighted. Even if the original source was under a workable license, since the content is also posted on a copyrighted site, I propose that it be speedily deleted. Your thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated on the the deletion discussion page. Passengerpigeon (talk) 03:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- DoneTheLongTone (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Message[edit]
The article regarding Karl Leidenroth has already been nominated for deletion, but was declined by an administrator. Why are you starting an edit-war? Jonas Vinther (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- See your talk page. You are very mistaken about what constitutes an edit war.TheLongTone (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- I left a new message for you on my talk page. Jonas Vinther (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, TheLongTone, I understand you may think my page about DHW is irrelevant, however it is more than just for my personal use. But, if you follow through with deleting the page, just know that another one will be back up, right away. PunkOfiFunny (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you[edit]
|
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| For extreme editing, above and beyond the call of duty on Holyland Case I award you this article rescue Barnstar. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks, much appreciated.TheLongTone (talk) 13:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
This deletion may be controversial; please go to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 15:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Lucy Lippard[edit]
Hi, I see you removed the list of selected publications I just added on the Lucy R. Lippard page. I see no reason for doing so. She is known as a famous art critic and writer and it is standard practice to list a bibliography of works or selected works. I hope to add this section back to the page asap. OR drohowa (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- I goofed, & have reverted the edits, I misread the diff as the list of works being removed. Sorry!TheLongTone (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi thanks for the clarification. My mistake. I must have looked at the edit history too fast! Thanks, OR drohowa (talk) 06:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
KEN Greenbook[edit]
With regards to your comment on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KEN_Greenbook#Page_moved ... amendments have been made. Kindly peruse and approve. Thank you.KEN Greenbook (talk) 08:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Stunnered[edit]
I re-tagged it as an attack page, should get deleted faster that way :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 22:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Why did u — Preceding unsigned comment added by 10liamsl (talk • contribs) 18:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
King C[edit]
I did convert it to redirect, because the term is actually in the article. Surprised me, but there it was. Peridon (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wonders will never cease.TheLongTone (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
The J.C. Klatch[edit]
Hello — About 45 minutes ago, you tagged The J.C. Klatch for speedy deletion, probably because it's a two-line stub with no references created by a new editor whose account name matches one of the names in the article. (Yeah, could there be any more red flags?) But it turns out that “The J.C. Klatch” may be a notable, uhm, individual, as there are references published on independent Websites. Is it possible for the nominator to reconsider a nomination for speedy deletion? 
Unician ∇ 11:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Can't say I can see enough to change my mind, but I suppose tehre is an outside chance that t belongs at AfD.TheLongTone (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
The Daniell Family/ Royal Daniell Family[edit]
Thank you for the notice. My contest has been stated on the articles talk page. I would appreciate if you took a look at the following articles in order to resolve any discrepancies: Royal Daniell Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) The Daniell Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Looking forward to hearing from you, Caoon (talk) 23:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- I've tagged another of the pages for deletion- two of the books don't seem to exist and the third doesn't mention the family at all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- You are so diligent & good at finding sources (I was very impressed by your sourcing up of Dave Hollins: Space Cadet). I must confess I only speedied these because they smelt wrong.TheLongTone (talk) 11:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
I reversed your speedy deletion tag on the article, prodded it instead, and speedied the user page. Do you want to report the usrn name to WP:UAA? Bearian (talk) 19:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done.23:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
I could use some help[edit]
I came across the stub Dragon Dream, a modern rigid airship, and I'm trying to work out its relationship to the manufacturers planned ML866 and ML868 designs, how much is of the work is down to the Walrus Hula, and then Project Pelican funding. And then how to fit that into the parent corporation and aeroscraft articles. Suspect you have enough of your own stuff to do, but if you know anything? GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I had a brief look at the articles having noted your revert on the Zeppelin article. I'll have a further look.TheLongTone (talk) 10:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- I certainly don't think separate articles on Aeroscraft , which seems to be a sort of trade name, and Worldwide Aeros Corp, are needed. The Dragon Dream seems to be a half-size demonstration vehicle, and may very well be what is elsewhere called the Pelican.TheLongTone (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Regarding Rahul Kumar & Joy Ghosh Page[edit]
Respected Sir, I noticed that you have nominated my pages for deletion / discussion for deletion: Rahul_Kumar_(businessman) & Joy_Ghosh_(businessman). If you refer to the history of page Rahul_Kumar_(businessman) the page was edited in requirements of Wikipedia. It is a short biography with links to all credible sources and was discussed with editor Ascii002 itself. I request you to please clear this article, as all sources are from leading newspapers and are 100% credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicontri1968 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- The articles are OK as far as tone goes (ie not promotional), but I fail to see that these men are notable: they are just businessmen doing their jobs.TheLongTone (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Respected Sir, there are notable references from leading newspapers like Economic Times, Business Standard, Reuters and Yahoo, which is quite notable and old (may be 2 years old or more). They are well written by independent journalists and denotes notability. We can say that these articles are biographies falling under Start category but does not go against the Wikipedia rules, these people are notable in some sense which is covered by independent sources (written by journalists and not self written). The reference points are being well proved and I will try my level best to make it better further. I request you to please withdraw the nomination for deletion for both the pages Rahul_Kumar_(businessman) and Joy_Ghosh_(businessman). I assure you further editing. Please acknowledge my request, I will be grateful to you.
Both the people have contributed to the industry, Rahul_Kumar_(businessman) valued WhatsApp at US$ 11 billion before it was sold to Facebook and Joy_Ghosh_(businessman) is the co-fund manager behind India's largest private equity fund which is notable in itself. Sir, I understand they are businessman doing there job, then why we don't impose the same on articles like [[1]] (having several deadlinks as references) and [[2]] which has only two references and both are dead, which does not prove notability at all. I request you to revisit your decision, and withdraw the nomination for deletion. Even I want to respect Wikipedia rules like you, and I want to become a contributor with ethics just same like you, and I assure you if I have not written a advertisement type article, I will further also not contribute anything absurd, this is my deep hearted request to withdraw the nomination for deletion(s). I thank you for your co-operation and support.
- This discussion belongs on the AfD discussion pages.TheLongTone (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Article is OK now. Thanks for reminding me as I had removed it from my watchlist. Yours, Quis separabit? 16:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks.TheLongTone (talk) 16:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Death of Theo Van Gogh[edit]
Hi Freishia speaking, sir, the article barely suggest Theo was assassinated. Sir do not delete the article instead , place the
in Theo's murder section. The article too meets Guidelines of Wikipedia. Sir its a main subject please try to understand FreshiaBomanberham (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know what you are talking about. The Van Gogh article states in the lead that he was assassinated. All you have done is copy that article, adding one trivial fact.TheLongTone (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Death of Theo van Gogh[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Death of Theo van Gogh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I don't think A10 applies, but I will tag it for a possible merge. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Did you read the talk page? The article is simply a cut & paste of the biography.TheLongTone (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- La Ville de Paris (airship)
- added links pointing to Chenu, Lagny and Coulommiers
- Zeppelin R Class
- added a link pointing to Baltic
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Stay Away[edit]
Sir, please mind your own business. Rksinghrules (talk) 17:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- It is my business. Wikipedia is not your private playpen.TheLongTone (talk) 17:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Allen Blakemore (Political Consultant)[edit]
Technically an "animal" I suppose, especially being involved politics, ;-) but I think you meant {{db-person}}, so I changed it to that. :-D --220 of Borg 16:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- yeah, there isn't a category for no-notable reptiles. Seriously, a slip of the finger. You did good.TheLongTone (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps Category:Animals in politics? O:-) --220 of Borg 16:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balloon mail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Paris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 16 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 14:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Clearly not a personal remark: I am commenting on your conduct. Coming from you, a request to interact is rich.TheLongTone (talk) 15:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Still it is a personal attack to accuse someone of conducting a holy war or jihad. That has nothing to do with the nominations. The Banner talk 15:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nonsense. You are slinging these accusations of incivility around with gay abandon. See WP:CIVIL. "Consider the possibility that something you said or did wrongly provoked a defensive, irritated or fed-up response. Be prepared to apologise for anything which you could / should have done better! (Note: if an awful lot of people seem to be getting ratty with you, the problem may be with you!).TheLongTone (talk) 15:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Still it is a personal attack to accuse someone of conducting a holy war or jihad. That has nothing to do with the nominations. The Banner talk 15:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Lil Drayne[edit]
I'll leave the salt to the next time. 'Lil Drayne'? What the hell made him choose that as a stage name? Or is he so concerned to merge Dre with Wayne that he hasn't noticed? Peridon (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- We'll have to wait until the page is recreated and hope there is a beautifully written explanation. Holding my breath I am not.TheLongTone (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Australian aviation firsts[edit]
Thanks for reviewing this. Can we remove the "does not cite" tag? If so, how? Can I do it myself? Do I just remove the first line - "unreferenced"? NingBing (talk) 02:28, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, you can take it off yourself.TheLongTone (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I didn't know the etquette.NingBing (talk) 10:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Oron Shaul[edit]
I have removed your CSD of Oron Shaul as I believe the article does not meet the speedy criteria. However, your point is well taken about a single soldier not necessarily needing an article. If you wish to pursue the matter further I suggest you take it to AFD so a bigger consensus can be developed. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Retro4Ever[edit]
The page was marked for deletion, and I posted a question there as to what had to be done to ensure compliance. No response was given and it was deleted. I am asking for clarification of what was wrong with it as I believe that I referenced, cited, and did everything properly according to Wikipedia's standards. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RetroNathan (talk • contribs) 18:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- What seemed to be wrong with it was essentially notability: in a case like this you need to come up with some reliable independant sources to establish that this blog has gained serious attention.TheLongTone (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Hedges Butler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lapland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samuel Franklin Cody may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |page=727}})</ref>) was a [[Wild West Shows|Wild West showman]] and early pioneer of manned flight. He is most famous
- 1912/1912%20-%200081.html Award of Medals] [[Flight International|''Flight]]'', 27 January 1912]</ref> The Cody V machine with a new 120 hp (90 kW) engine won the £5,000 prize
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Canoe and the Saddle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- author [[Theodore Winthrop]] (1828–1861). It vividly describes the beauty of [[Washington {State)|Washington]]’s landscape and natural resources as well as the tumultuous relationship between
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
I seconded the proposed deletion, but a permanent redirect would be cheap and easy too. Bearian (talk) 15:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Agree, I do redirect if the target is obvious, but wasn't quite sure what the best target was in this case..TheLongTone (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
"1st Picardy"[edit]
Thanks for helping to sort out my bungling but could you make it "First Battle of Picardy" rather than "1st" please?Keith-264 (talk) 18:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- No sooner said than done: for future reference, page moving is easy & can be done by anybody: use the little 'more' link next to the watchlist star.TheLongTone (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 6 I have added an explanation here for the mistakes I've made. Odd really, because the last time I tried to change a redirect (not a page move), I managed it. Thanks for all your help.Keith-264 (talk) 18:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Spoke too soon: there is a (circular) redirect at the desired page name, which I think you know about...would have been simpler to have dropped the new article into the redirect. I know you don't get the article on you count of articles created, but you still get the feeling of having done good!TheLongTone (talk) 18:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nominate it for deletion, or alternatively if there is an admin you are on good terms with you could try asking them nicely. Do you have Twinkle enabled? If you don't nominating things for deletion s a bit of a pain, I don't mind doing it.TheLongTone (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Never heard of it, my Wikimojo is weak. ;O) If you would it would be quicker. When I looked at the advice page it cautioned against deleting redirects which is why I meddled with it. PS what difference does an article count make; do I get a prize? Thanks againKeith-264 (talk) 19:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- The article count makes no difference unless you care about such things. I'll do the deed right now.TheLongTone (talk) 19:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 6 August[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Henry Tracey Coxwell page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014[edit]
I have now edited my article several times in order to meet your 'non-promotional' standards. Please can you read the article and tell me if you now think it is acceptable.
Thanks Scherer97 — Preceding undated comment added 13:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Henry Tracey Coxwell
- added a link pointing to Cremorne Gardens
- List of Vanity Fair (British magazine) caricatures (1895–99)
- added a link pointing to Joseph Wood
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Nulli Secundus[edit]
Hi,
Just for your interest, Capper and Cody did overfly Buck House on the way in, but had no intention of landing. After flying round St. Paul's,contrary winds prevented them from returning to Farnborough, so they first tried to land on Clapham Common but the throngs of spectators made it too dangerous. They then diverted to the grounds of the Crystal Palace, which Cody knew well from when his kiting workshop had been based there. Walker tells the whole story in his "Early Aviation At Farnborough", Vol. I. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I assume from the above that you have the Walker book, which I've skimmed but not read fully, good to know that I was right about Buck House...I was being bold removing the statement, from the (fair amount) I've read about Nulli Secundus & also a feeling that it was screamingly unlikely, even though it caried a reference: I was assuming that the statement had been dropped into a referenced sentence.TheLongTone (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- I seem to recall that at an early stage of planning the journey they toyed with the idea, more in jest than in earnest, of literally dropping in on the King's household but rejected it quickly as inadvisable. Certainly, royal friendship was a mark of Cody's Farnborough days; the idea was simply to pay a return visit, as something of a personal joke. It's not significant enough to try and chase down a reference, though. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Canoe and the Saddle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington State and Klickitat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
I see that you have PRODded this article. I agree it does not qualify for an article at this time, but what would you think about redirecting it to United States House of Representatives elections in Tennessee, 2014#District 7 instead of prodding it? I believe that is common practice for candidates for office who are otherwise not notable. I didn't want to do this on my own, but wanted to see if you agree. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, although another possibility would be to userfy it in case he does get elected. Since the ins & outs of US politics are not an area of expertise, I don't know how likely this is, altho I did note that i's Republican at the moment.TheLongTone (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- WP:NPOL says "In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion. Relevant material from the biographical article can be merged into the election or political office page if appropriate." This approach leaves a history which can be restored if they get elected. The relevant footnote adds "Deleting a biography in these cases instead of merely redirecting it makes recovering useful information from the page history difficult, and should be done only when there are relevant reasons other than lack of notability for removing the article from the mainspace." I will remove the PROD and go ahead and redirect this article. I'll also watchlist it in case somebody tries to restore it inappropriately. --MelanieN (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Right, I'll remember that guideline the next time I encounter a similar page.TheLongTone (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- WP:NPOL says "In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion. Relevant material from the biographical article can be merged into the election or political office page if appropriate." This approach leaves a history which can be restored if they get elected. The relevant footnote adds "Deleting a biography in these cases instead of merely redirecting it makes recovering useful information from the page history difficult, and should be done only when there are relevant reasons other than lack of notability for removing the article from the mainspace." I will remove the PROD and go ahead and redirect this article. I'll also watchlist it in case somebody tries to restore it inappropriately. --MelanieN (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Origins: Discovery[edit]
Greetings TheLongTone and thanks for your comment on the article on Origins: Discovery. You guys are faster than the speed of light! I was asked by fans to support the Wiki page as the author of the novel because the work is highly controversial. It deals with the Armenian Genocide that occurred nearly 100 years ago, and those that are aware of the work from the early releases have realized as we approach the centenary memorial that there was a need for some information to compliment your excellent article on the Armenian Genocide itself. I agree the article needs work and will promise to assist the submitter to improve it, but please understand that while I certainly concur with your blunt appraisal of the work as being 'non-notable' at present, that is not likely to remain so, especially with the interest from New Zealand/Australia (whose soldiers fought the Ottoman Army at the same time as the Genocide) and Armenia itself, let alone a certain nation's reaction that was at the centre of the Genocide. I will have no complaint if you do delete but humbly request that you allow the article in the circumstances please (even better if you would take action after reading the novel :-)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwiodysee (talk • contribs) 13:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Citycon Speedy Delete[edit]
Hi TheLongTone, It looks like we both proposed deletion on Citycon when we were curating at the same time, but yours was speedy and mine was AfD. Should we work something out so that only one of those processes is in effect? Upjav (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- I guess the speedy might as well be struck, since its at AfD.TheLongTone (talk) 16:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Paul Bassat[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Paul Bassat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of aviation – 19th century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Holmes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Ostrich?[edit]
Hi. It wasn't a threat, or an "inexplicable" comment, as you speak of in your talk page history. Don't take it the wrong way, but I only wanted to make it up to you for the way I acted in the past about having "The Little Things Give You Away" being redirected to its last album, like Minutes to Midnight for example. I want to make it up to you, as I am still confused about that "Ostrich" section you left on my talk page before it was removed because of me. The question is... what did you mean by the term "Ostrich" when I was blocked for 30 hours in the past? Thank you, and I apologize for any cause of trouble that I have done. Thank you. Skylar3214 9:14, 3 August 2014
- I'm sorry, but I simply can't remember why I left that comment on your talk page...TheLongTone (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- This was what you put on my talk page before it was removed later on, after my comment to your "Ostrich" section in June 2014 [3] Skylar3214 12:04, 4 September 2014
- The comment was clear: it was a reference to your ostrich-like behaviour in blanking comments on your talk page rather than modifying your behaviour to avoid others feeling the need to leave such comments. Since that one comment on your talk page I have had no interaction with you, so I do not see what point you are trying to make. I certainly hold no grudge agaist you. Life is too short.TheLongTone (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Now I see what you mean when you put "Ostrich" on my talk page. Next time, please do not put it on my talk page anymore. I would appreciate it if you don't do that again. It clearly bugged me for the first time. That's all I want you to know. Skylar3214 9:19, 4 September 2014
- Youwere acting like an idiot then, and you are continuing to do so. If you act like an idiot, people will tell you. The remedy is to stop acting like an idiot. You have a nerve copmplaining about what I posted on your talk page and then inflicting this gibberish on me.TheLongTone (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Then, you won't accept my apology? I understand if you don't. Skylar3214 6:34, 6 September 2014
- Well, I really dont't see that you have anything much to apologise about. But if you feel the need to apologise, I certainly accept it although I am asmidge mystified as to why you are digging up what is to me a dead issue.TheLongTone (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Then, you won't accept my apology? I understand if you don't. Skylar3214 6:34, 6 September 2014
- Youwere acting like an idiot then, and you are continuing to do so. If you act like an idiot, people will tell you. The remedy is to stop acting like an idiot. You have a nerve copmplaining about what I posted on your talk page and then inflicting this gibberish on me.TheLongTone (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Now I see what you mean when you put "Ostrich" on my talk page. Next time, please do not put it on my talk page anymore. I would appreciate it if you don't do that again. It clearly bugged me for the first time. That's all I want you to know. Skylar3214 9:19, 4 September 2014
- The comment was clear: it was a reference to your ostrich-like behaviour in blanking comments on your talk page rather than modifying your behaviour to avoid others feeling the need to leave such comments. Since that one comment on your talk page I have had no interaction with you, so I do not see what point you are trying to make. I certainly hold no grudge agaist you. Life is too short.TheLongTone (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- This was what you put on my talk page before it was removed later on, after my comment to your "Ostrich" section in June 2014 [3] Skylar3214 12:04, 4 September 2014
Reference Errors on 8 September[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Julie Kitchen page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
My Article[edit]
Hey as I am new to Wikipedia i try to publish an article about a trading platform You marked it as spam, and i dont understand why. I did my best to write a good article. If you have any suggestions for me let me know. Wish you a nice day Sincerely Achilles25 (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Problem is that the article reads like a brochure for the software: I do accept that you have not used any promtional language. It also looks as thoug many of the sources are the company who developed this: it seems to be new & independant sources are needed to establish that it is notable.TheLongTone (talk) 12:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick reply, well i have few more sources, but they are on german. But as you can see i posted one interview with the CEO provided by a Broker, and also a demonstration that this software is used in japanese TV I can also provide more sources which are provided by some brokers if this helps. Is here some kind of a PM system where i can send you the sources and you can maybe give me feedback on them? Sincerely Achilles25 (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Computer software sources are not something I know much about, so can't really help, but reviews in good technical publications or websites would help. I'll remove the spedy tag to give youtime to source it.TheLongTone (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much, i will try to do this by today evening or tmr. Have a nice day and thank you for your suggestions Achilles25 (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Accounting Professionalism[edit]
Thanks dear for your contribution through writing signal of Proposed deletion of Accounting Professionalism on the basis of WP:NODICTIONARY. I want to tell on this issue. Yes, I started it from definition of accounting professionalism. But I want to grow it with other wikipedians who are interested in accounting. Article on accounting professionalism will be notable for all those who are learning this profession. So, please remove your proposed deletion and send link to other wikipedian for my help. Thanks.
- I think not. The topic is in any case already covered in various articles on accounting.TheLongTone (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok, as your desire. In wikipedia, any one has right to delete other's contribution. But it should be good if you search such pages in accounting any absorb my new article on accounting professionalism in other. Otherwise, better is construction instead of destruction. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by एसवी ट्यूशन (talk • contribs) 07:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Mark Dinning (journalist)[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mark Dinning (journalist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
It's a plausible search term, so I was bold and redirected it instead of deleting it. Bearian (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Vegan spam[edit]
While I get your point, that might be somewhat harsh language to hit a new editor in a class project, don't you think?
Bigger question - how would you make vegan spam? Tempeh might give you the right consistency, but how would you make it taste bad enough? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Point taken but this is clearly a promotional article given al the inline links.TheLongTone (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, it was a bad article, no doubt, and it should never have been created in article space rather than a sandbox. The whole situation was bad and I appreciate your willingness to step in to clean up a problem article. And it's certainly helpful for the student to see, in stark terms, what's wrong with their writing. So no criticism there. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I moved Dr. Amara Enyia to Amara Enyia a few seconds before you left a speedy deletion notice there (that was inadvertently posted on my talk page). I was unsure whether to mark it for CSD or not so I moved the page. You might want to leave the notice on the new page. st170etalk 15:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ferdinand Porsche may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- of [[Hans Ledwinka]] of [[Tatra (car)|Tatra]], in particular the [[Tatra V570]] and [[Tatra 97]]). This resulted in a lawsuit against Porsche claiming infringement of Tatra's patents regarding
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Throw A Penny[edit]
Why are you so hell bent on deleting the page for the song "Throw A Penny"? This was an official US single by a major recording act. There are several thousand pages for songs out there that are of no real significance, were never hits or are from minor acts that never even had a hit on the charts. Lou72JG (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- See WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:SONG. The song is non-notable. That other non-notable songs &c have articles is an argument for deleting of redirecting the rather than keepimg one.TheLongTone (talk) 14:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Hinman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Merry Merry[edit]
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
The source is serious and you know it. Please return the edition to the article or introduce the content in other part of the article. In what part do you think can be the information? --Pediainsight (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- A religious magazine is not a reliable source for claims about engineering. The other elements were already present in the article.--Jeffro77 (talk) 02:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Need Help[edit]
I need random number (should be changed on each execution) in my article. How would i get such function; Please help. thanks in advance. Nirjal stha (talk) 16:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year![edit]
Dear TheLongTone,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
Speedy deletion declined: Richmond SPCA[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Richmond SPCA, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's only one line that is a distinct enough sentence to be considered copyvio in my mind. Certainly not enough for speedy deletion. Raise at copyvio if you want a more detailed look at it. . Thank you. GedUK 14:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Noyce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
why we not write our original or genuine website?[edit]
tell me why we not write article for our website. my website is www.e-worldz.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajmoney01 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Because it was incoherent and promotional.TheLongTone (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Simon Freakley article[edit]
Speedy deletion notice suggests that the subject of the article is a musical recording, whereas in fact he is noteworthy as a businessman with an international reputation in business reconstruction as shown in the online newspaper sources. Mirrortoamermaid (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
The reason for speedy deletion has now been changed, however it remains a fact that the subject has an international reputation for company restructuring as shown in the many online newspaper interviews attached as sources. He was also Birmingham University alumni of the year in 2007 Mirrortoamermaid (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Airplane[edit]
You forgot to remove "8".[4] OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- I sprinkle typos and small errors wherever I go...TheLongTone (talk) 13:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Forgiato Wheels[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Forgiato Wheels, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having notable singers referring to this in their songs is a clear assertion of importace. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 16:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
schools[edit]
Schools do not fall into A7. Not even primary schools. Primary school articles are not usually kept, need to be either merged to the location or go to prod. Please re-read WP:CSD DGG ( talk ) 20:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- To follow, do not re-add bogus, declined speedy deletion tags to pages. If a request is turned down, take it to PROD or the relevant XfD. WilyD 23:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have seemn many primary schools speedied.TheLongTone (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail![edit]
Message added 22:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hey TheLongTone,
I totally agree with the deletion of the Backwell School Radio article. Would you agree that it belongs as a section on the Backwell School article? That is where I believe it belongs however another [anonymous] user (whom has a dislike for me) disagrees...
Thanks :) Edward Callow (Ecallow)
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code. 22:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Merge or redirect would seem sensibleTheLongTone (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I've declined your speedy deletion request on this article because it says she is a journalist for the Guardian, a major British newspaper. This is a reasonable assertion of significance so CSD:A7 doesn't apply. Feel free to nominate at WP:PROD or WP:AFD if you still want the article deleted. Stifle (talk) 15:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Actually it is not a reasonable assertion of notability. A journo needs to be written about in addition to writing.TheLongTone (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
If you are interested in Sinan then I can recommend The Age of Sinan by Gülru Necipoğlu. The wiki articles on Turkish buildings are generally weak and would benefit from the addition of sourced content from this book. My interest is in tiles - but I noticed that there wasn't an article on the Haseki Mosque and having some suitable sources I created a stub. Aa77zz (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
smarTours deletion[edit]
smarTours is an international tour operator who contributes to many news sites and publications and is very important within the travel industry, does this not warrant importance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howardjacobsen123 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- No.TheLongTone (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Capricorns (band) deletion notice[edit]
Hello, i have just posted in the article's talk page the reasons i think this article meets the notability criteria, so please let me know if these aren't enough what else can i search for to prove it's notability. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henriettanuttal (talk • contribs) 17:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Did they get any seious critical acclaim or have any real influence? Sorry, but they look like just another rck band to me.TheLongTone (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)é
RILW180MMEF-BEK[edit]
Hiya TheLongTone, yeah that was just an accident, sorry MyTuppence (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- No worries!TheLongTone (talk) 14:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on this article. I admit my tendency was to do the same, but I decided to see if Google News would have anything, and it does. There's considerably material to work from there, and the article deserves a chance. I think the company passes WP:COMPANY. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Looks pretty small-scale to me, but can't be bothered to argue. At least its not blatant spam.TheLongTone (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of The London Session for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The London Session is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The London Session until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marchjuly (talk) 07:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
you are being discussed on the administrator's noticeboard/incidents[edit]
You are being discussed on the administrator's noticeboard/incidents as regards allegations of abusive posts at Trajan vuia, and the trajan vuia talk page.Ion G Nemes (talk) 02:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Physician, heal thyself.TheLongTone (talk) 13:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam tag[edit]
You tagged Detective Dixie and the Revenge of Wishteria as spam. I agree that there are promotional elements to the article, but it is not irreparably spammy. That's why I had PROD'ed it at first -- the game clearly isn't notable (at least not yet, as it's not yet even released). I would recommend an AFD route instead. Your thoughts? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- I guess not irreparable spam, but a clearly promotional article that is WP:TOOSOONTheLongTone (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Malik House[edit]
I am still interested for your opion on my article Malik House. I have now provided sources that show the company to be notable. If you still deem this company as not notable then please provide me with information that could help you change your mind. You seem to be going for the articles I write and I would like to start contributing more, however don't want this to be a problem! - Thanks Scherer97 (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing personal I assure you, I do new page patrolling & it's coincidence that I have encountered this article more than once. However, since this page has since been deleted I can only assume that whatever you added was not enough to establish notability. You would really need non-routine national press coverage.TheLongTone (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Resolution for Sebastian Deery[edit]
Sebastian Deery is a short film actor and musician based on Canada who is also going to direct a movie. He also got award from People's Music Awards for 'Best Rock/Indie/Metal/Punk Award'. It is not fair to delete a page of a recognized award winner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaji E.M (talk • contribs) 14:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ther are awards and awards: this one looked to thin for notability to me. In any case I have not deleted the article, only suggested the idea. Argue your case on the article's talk page.TheLongTone (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Boo Hoo[edit]
TheLongTone Please Kwahu Easter is a very notable celebrations in Ghana. I dont know why you nominated it for speedy deletion because a quick google search will give u more than enough references.
- I nominated it for deletion because the article makes no case for this celebration of Easter being in any way notable or interesting, and also because it was written by somebody defending The River Killer, as arrant a lump of dreck as I have ever seen. Try harder.TheLongTone (talk)
- Why do yo want to delete the Kwahu Easter article?I contested your deletion and a neutral person remove the tag and you still want to delete.--Rberchie (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- See above & article talk pageTheLongTone (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Why do yo want to delete the Kwahu Easter article?I contested your deletion and a neutral person remove the tag and you still want to delete.--Rberchie (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Kwahu Easter[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kwahu Easter, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: At least one of the links is a credible indication of importance. Notability will have to be tested at AfD if you think this needs to be deleted. . Thank you. GedUK 12:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC) Ok I will make it livelier but as you can see I have tagged it as a stub so I will get other people in my community to improve it. Regards.
Speedy deletion of golfers[edit]
These golfers I have created articles for are all top 10 finishers in The Open Championship, perhaps the most important golf tournament in the world. They have all been red linked by other editors for article creation. Consult with master golf editor Tewapack about this. He is the resident expert on Wiki golf. He will tell you these golfers' articles should remain.
I do contest deletion on all of the articles you have tagged.
Thanks, --EditorExtraordinaire (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Are top ten finishers in a field of ten or less notable? I would have thought that you really need more than the one result to establish notability: otherwise they cnn simply be part of the article on the competition. Also, WP:NOTINHERITED. It competing in this one event is their sole claim to fame. What is an amateur professional golfer, btw????TheLongTone (talk) 13:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Darker Than Blood[edit]
Hello, LongTone. I noticed that "Darker Than Blood" was redirected to Neon Future II. May I ask why that is? Skylar3214 10:14, 11 April 2015
- And I apologize if I didn't log in before putting this on a user's talk page. Next time, I'll do it correctly. Thanks. Skylar3214 10:19, 11 April 2015
- There will be more info about the song available after a while. Please be patient and don't redirect it. If you really want to help then improve the article. Mike:Golu · [ Confidential message ] 06:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- The second redirect was by another editor. I'm not anywhere near interested in this kind of music to work on the article, and in any case it's far too soon to tekk if this recording is notable. Most songs are not.TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- I understand. Thanks for the heads up. Skylar3214 (talk) 23:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- The second redirect was by another editor. I'm not anywhere near interested in this kind of music to work on the article, and in any case it's far too soon to tekk if this recording is notable. Most songs are not.TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Deb. I wanted to know why ‘meem م’ was taged for speedy deletion? it shares basic information about a bank which is approved in many of your Wikipedia pages. I made sure I add as many references as possible to meet the requirements of Wikipedia.
Notable[edit]
Well, Aunt Jemima is notable and so is How Can It Be (album), and guess what Aunt Jemima is even profiled in Uncloudy Days: The Gospel Music Encyclopedia, and Bil Carpenter wrote the encyclopedia, who writes for AllMusic. It is located on pages 28–9 if you want to go read about her, so my Auntie Jemima should be included in this encyclopedia.The Cross Bearer (talk) 01:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oh well, I'll not pursue this further, thanks to the link to Aunt Jemima.TheLongTone (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, for the misplaced comment above. Aunt Jemima was notable, but I went about it the wrong way with regards to the comment.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm. Not sur we're talking about the same Aunt Jemima. Actually I have no idea where I picked up this phrase, for which I do not know a suitable contemporary American equivalent. In British English I could say 'so and so, my left foot'...there are less polite options. I haver a strong weakness for obsolete slang.TheLongTone (talk) 10:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, for the misplaced comment above. Aunt Jemima was notable, but I went about it the wrong way with regards to the comment.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: CelebrityNetWorth[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of CelebrityNetWorth, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The range of articles that mention work that the site has done is enough of a credible indication of importance for A7. Take to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK 12:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Please see my contest of Speedy Deletion of the Alicat Scientific page. As I am a new Wikipedia editor, perhaps you could offer some feedback as to how the page could be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahatAlicat (talk • contribs) 23:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
ANI[edit]
Since I have named you as an affected party, I'm giving you the courtesy of letting you know there is a discussion at ANI regarding edits at Traian Vuia . Flat Out let's discuss it 06:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Cheers. Have commented there.TheLongTone (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I've declined your speedy deletion tag on this page. I don't find the reduced version that I had edited to be overtly promotional. The concept has been studied and published in academic journals. The conclusions need citations (or to be removed), but overall, not advertising or promotion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
There appears to be a collection of new users defending this article. I've declined the speedy tag for now as there is coverage in sources, but it needs closer investigation I think. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion Tag: Hamilton King Management Limited[edit]
You recently tagged this page with a no indication of importance tag. I understand that at the minute this page is not yet complete, but it is a work in progress. I will be adding more content to this page to meet all appropriate guidelines and requirements. WMartin74 (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Fine words butter no parsnips.TheLongTone (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Alicat Scientific[edit]
Hello TheLongTone,
I had previously left you a message and a contest to the speedy deletion of the Alicat Scientific page. I am still awaiting a response and feedback as to the issues you found with the page. I would very much appreciate feedback as this was my first Wikipedia page. Thank you!SarahatAlicat (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- I seem to have missed any previous message. I can't really help you I'm afraid: since the article is gone its lear that somebody else agreed that the article did not establish the notability of this company. Your username suggests a connection: there is possibly a conflict of onterest problem here.TheLongTone (talk) 14:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
AB AETERNO[edit]
Hello TheLongTone, I had previously left you a message regarding the speedy deletion of the AB AETERNO page. Can you explain me in more detail why you deleted the page? Many companies have a page on Wikipedia as well and they are still online, why? I just wrote about the story of the brand and what we sell, as all the other companies do on Wikipedia page without any slogan or advertising. What's the difference between us and the other companies? Waiting for your kind reply. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinaVitas (talk • contribs) 13:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I didn't delete it: I suggested that it should be deleted, firstly because there was no credible asserion of notability and secondly because the article was promotional in tone. Obviously the admin who did delete it agreed. Wikipedia is not a free advertising medium.11:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello TheLongTone, I saw a Wikipedia page of WeWOOD, one of our competitor and their page is still online. Why? The tone of the page is the same as the AB AETERNO's. Moreover we haven't find any other direct competitor....are you promoting We Wood? Waiting for your kind reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinaVitas (talk • contribs) 13:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
PROD of Nuzlocke (Challenge)[edit]
Hi, I removed the PROD tag because there are lots of reliable sources listed in the references. It's not Fancruft at all in my opinion, please tell me what's wrong with it and I can fix it. --☣Anarchyte☣ 12:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing you can do will change the eye-watering triviality of this article.TheLongTone (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- So all those valid references supporting the article and proving it's a real thing won't help in any way? --☣Anarchyte☣ 12:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Not in my opinion: I don't see why the rather limited content cannot be included elesewhere.TheLongTone (talk) 12:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Where else could it be included? --☣Anarchyte☣ 12:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sure you can find somewhere in the multitude of articles on this subject.TheLongTone (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Where else could it be included? --☣Anarchyte☣ 12:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Not in my opinion: I don't see why the rather limited content cannot be included elesewhere.TheLongTone (talk) 12:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- So all those valid references supporting the article and proving it's a real thing won't help in any way? --☣Anarchyte☣ 12:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015[edit]
Please don't speedy deletion of Jobert Austria. please read and search Kuya Jobert. RoiVladimir (talk,) 20:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC) (PST)
AfD process[edit]
Hi TheLongTone, I noticed a few of the AfD tags you've placed recently. If you are not going to use TWINKLE for nominating pages for deletion, please make sure you read WP:AFDHOWTO so that they are formatted and added to the log properly. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, me being lazy. For some reason I can't always use Twinkle.TheLongTone (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words! K-pop? Football? ;o) Nortonius (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 8 June[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Bristol Freighter page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Why Cool Automation's page should not be deleted[edit]
The reasons we think that Cool Automation has important encyclopedic value: Cool Automation's products are actually new unique products in the HVAC world, which allow the automation of VRF air conditioners. Prior to the first CoolMater's product launch - there was no way for VRF air conditioners to automate the units and control them online. Another point is that CoolAutomation's products allow the connection of many air conditioning units from many different manufacturers with a single gateway. As of today - there are no other products in the world which allow the connection of a variety of manufacturers HVAC units with one gateway solution, and there are no other solutions that allow the smart connection of VRFs. Also, many of our partners have active wikipedia pages, and we think we should have one as well... examples: control4 Lutron Electronics Company
Please let me know if that sounds like a good enough reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imoreno (talk • contribs) 12:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion declined: IQ imbalance[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I declined the deletion of IQ imbalance, a page you tagged for speedy deletion per CSD A1 because of the following concern:
This page has plenty of context. Although some of it is written in a "mathematical language", there is still enough English context to identify the subject of the article.
If you would like to discuss it, please post a message on my talk page. I will see it there. Thank you. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 15:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Cayley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the first flying model aeroplane and also diagrammed the elements of vertical flight.<ref>{{cite web
- Philosophy, Chemistry and the Arts''. The 2007 discovery of sketches in Cayley's school notebooks (held in the archive of the [[Royal Aeronautical Society]] Library revealed that even at school
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Cayley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- which act on any flying vehicle: [[weight]], [[Lift (force)|lift]], [[Drag (physics)|drag]], and [[thrust]. Modern aeroplane design is based on those discoveries, and also on the importance of [[
- Philosophy, Chemistry and the Arts''. The 2007 discovery of sketches in Cayley's school notebooks (held in the archive of the [[Royal Aeronautical Society]] Library revealed that even at school
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello TheLongTone,
Thanks for patrolling new pages, Wikipedia appreciates your help. However, I want to let you know that I recreated the above page you earlier tagged for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#A7. I was amazed that Smartse (talk · contribs) still went ahead to wrongly deleted the page per the same criterion after you took it to WP:AfD. I respectfully suggest that you should not rush to tag articles for speedy deletion when the article contain at least one reliable source in the future. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Sources[edit]
Paraphasing italian writer Umberto Eco, "In a world with 7 billion people, do you agree there are so many imbeciles? On internet, the imbecile can opinate about everything he doesn`t understand" (in Brazilian Veja magazine, ed 2432, July, 1st 2015 http://veja.abril.com.br/noticia/brasil/a-conspiracao-dos-imbecis/). Probably a little strident or prejudiced statement from the italian writer, but I could easily apply Eco`s phrase to the pre-internet era, in a better way. There was a huge profusion of apocryphal and spurious books written on a time journalism and public opinion wasn`t so efficient on verification and review. If we include in that collection of absudities the taboos and hoaxes before internet, something that lasted for centuries before being unmasked (the meaning of "Kangaroo", for instance was debunked in the 1970s by linguist John B. Haviland in his research with the Guugu Yimithirr people, but people all around the world insists in believe on the legend, not on the truth - more "romantic", probably), then we will start to doubt about the so called "books published by very reputable publishers". I can even notice much more legal challenges on books contents today than in 1966. What I SAW at Sir Wykenham book is ONLY his opinion and NOT a source of information. The lack of legal suits about Sir Wykenham book (and others)is due to lack of interest on that. Moreover, you said "incidentally I believe that Voisin also makes some claim...". OK! That one more opinion and I respect that but... prove it! Simple like that. I told I couldn`t find any reliable source - and I`m still stagnant at this point. I didn`t even mention internet, althoug this would be interesting and provide us with more easily verifiable data. By the way: I AM NOT MAKING VANDALISM (commonplace for wiki editors` contrarieties), just pointing my index finger to your opinions and Sir Wykenham`s... Change back the edition. RobertoRMola (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Nevertheless it is a sourced statement, whether or not you like it. TheLongTone (talk) 11:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Not a case for like or dislike - just a credibility issue. Your "sourced" statement is only that: a statement (opinion) from someone else. I could write a book with (my) different statement - will it be a sourced statement, also, just because a conventional printed book? Still looking (waiting) for real sources (official documents as agreements and contracts) on that subject. RobertoRMola (talk) 23:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Nonsense. It's a credible source...a proper biography of Santos Dumont. As I'm sure you know, he destroyed all his papers, so whining about there not being a contract or whatever is simply dumb. It's a credible source that you do not believe.11:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Be more specific: WHAT is nonsense? Research is like a chain: a credible source cite its sources, and so on. Wykenham book didn`t. It`s only his opinion. It's so clear in the text, but you couldn`t see it. So you decided that`s a "credible source", and - I laughed a lot about your next statement - a "proper" biography of Santos-Dumont. So you think I`m whining too much? Or you think I'm rocking the boat full of Wright lovers? TheLongTone, you are dealing a lot with wikipedia edition. This is not important; truth is, and deserves our attention and responsibility (that`s why I ALWAYS use my real name and not a fancy nickname). That book is biased and never could be used as a source for anything about SD. RobertoRMola (talk) 15:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
RFC/N discussion of the username "NotAnOmbudsman"[edit]
A request for comment has been filed concerning the username of NotAnOmbudsman (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion here. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Thelongtone[edit]
Tone , simeonoyeyemi is a pioneer from Dayton, Ohio. Born in the same neighborhood as The Wrightbrothers and Paul Lawrence Dunbar. He is Paul Lawrence of hiphop. The most known unknown. If you are interested contact via @theodoreunit on Instagram, take a trip to Dayton and visit the Wright brothers museum. He will schedule the meeting room there so that you may interview. This offer open to all who wish to have Simeon Oyeyemi removed but want to keep Bootylicious; which Simeon Oyeyemi dances in and did the graffiti for. Simeon Oyeyemi is the creator/pioneer behind the term (when he dated Beyoncé ) just because you don't know doesn't mean you haven't enjoyed. That's what an encyclopedia of this nature is mostly about. NOT A REQURGITATED NEWS FEED LIKE LONGTONE THAT IS MORE OF A BLOG. THAN NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA INPUT FRON THE PIONEERS. THE HORSES MOUTH. TONE SPEAKS ABOUT THE WRIGHT BROS BUT WASNT THERE. IF YOU ARE NOT A TOP AUTHORITARIAN WHY DOES THELONGTONE HAVE A PAGE. SUGGESTION FOR REMOVAL oR Flatline OF THE LONG TONE . Is he providing new content or is he just a LINK. Kaoszulu (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Simeon Oyeyemi 30years behind the scenes[edit]
@theodoreunit
Tone , simeonoyeyemi is a pioneer from Dayton, Ohio. Born in the same neighborhood as The Wrightbrothers and Paul Lawrence Dunbar. He is Paul Lawrence of hiphop. The most known unknown. If you are interested contact via @theodoreunit on Instagram, take a trip to Dayton and visit the Wright brothers museum. He will schedule the meeting room there so that you may interview. This offer open to all who wish to have Simeon Oyeyemi removed but want to keep Bootylicious; which Simeon Oyeyemi dances in and did the graffiti for. Kaoszulu (talk) 20:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Georges Favre-Jacot [edit]
Hello TheLongTone,
Just to tell you, I've added more information to this article. Really he is a notable individual, if a person would look to the Zenith article, anyway the additions probably cover the factor you identified which was a problem with the content, so I thought to suggest maybe you might remove the deletion notification, unless you have some other criticism, since you chose speedy deletion, and haven't posted a response to my contesting this yet, Thanks. Whalestate (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Jackie Saad Robinson[edit]
Hi, I just wrote you yesteday. I think my page should not be speedily deleted because I am Jackie Saad, and I'm trying to show what I have done in my whole life and career here in Colombia, where the people know me. I have worked in USA, Latin America, Europe, and so on. And so many people, who speak english, know who i am; and maybe they Google me and can find a page of me, but in english, not in spanish. My biography was written by Kevin Pedrozo, a person who works for me in my office, so i give him the whole rights to publish that information in Colarte and other websites he wants to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prmih (talk • contribs) 15:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello TheLongTone,
Thanks for patrolling new pages, Wikipedia appreciates your help. However, I want to let you know that I recreated the above page you earlier tagged for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#A7. I was amazed that Smartse (talk · contribs) still went ahead to wrongly deleted the page per the same criterion after you took it to WP:AfD. I respectfully suggest that you should not rush to tag articles for speedy deletion when the article contain at least one reliable source in the future. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:10, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- I see that the new article actually does make a credible claim of notability. The old one didn't.TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- it did made a claim of significance. I left a note for Smartse (talk · contribs). Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 15:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm SueDonem. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tower Club at lebua because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SueDonem (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- SueDonem, are you in anyway familiar with WP:DTR? You probably should not template an established editor like user:TheLongTone in the future. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Apologies to TheLongTone for sure! However, the edit was so egregiously the work of someone who doesn't understand Wikipedia policy that my instinct was to inform the editor that the edit was not constructive. I am sure this edit was uncharacteristic of TheLongTone's normal work. Again, apologies. SueDonem (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm disappointed to see such an unconstructive edit from established editor.WP:AGF. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, a moment of madness.TheLongTone (talk) 13:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm disappointed to see such an unconstructive edit from established editor.WP:AGF. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Apologies to TheLongTone for sure! However, the edit was so egregiously the work of someone who doesn't understand Wikipedia policy that my instinct was to inform the editor that the edit was not constructive. I am sure this edit was uncharacteristic of TheLongTone's normal work. Again, apologies. SueDonem (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
| Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with…
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 
|
Kite control systems (talk) | 
|
Cleanup | ||||
| 7 | 
|
Léon Serpollet (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Expand
| |
| 5 |
|
Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Expand | |
| 20 | 
|
Timeline of jet power (talk) |
|
|
Unencyclopaedic
| |||
| 503 |
|
Of Mice & Men (band) (talk) | Unencyclopaedic
| |||||
| 641 |
|
Mahindra & Mahindra (talk) | Merge
| |||||
| 2 |
|
Armand Deperdussin (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Wikify | |
| 24 |
|
SNCASO Trident (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Wikify | |
| 1 |
|
SevenGates (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Orphan
|
| 4 |
|
Carrier frequency offset (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Orphan | |
| 9 |
|
Tristesse Hivernale (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
| 48 |
|
Skazi (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
| 11 |
|
Fimbulwinter (band) (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
| 8 |
|
François Laurent d'Arlandes (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Stub | |
| 48 |
|
Draugiem.lv (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Stub | |
| 31 |
|
Sons of Texas (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Aren't the various articles discussing Speed of Light (and particularly it's video) enough for notability?[edit]
Asking naively, not rhetorically. Various of those articles don't appear to be just "huh, Maiden released a single, here's the infodump we posted back when the album was announced". 201.190.31.3 (talk) 00:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Not in my opinion given that the article has zero actual content: there's a single, it has a video. Yawn.TheLongTone (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
StudentCrowd Speedy Deletion[edit]
Hi TheLongTone, I feel the page does hold a valid case for an article. It is the first of its kind with regards to a student review platform as a complete package and its web presence is continuing to grow. I'm a bit new to this 'talk' section so I'm not sure whether you reply or not. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by JFar80 (talk • contribs) 12:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Exhit320[edit]
This is not a page of promotional. It is a gallery which exhibit arts. haw can it becomes a promotional page???
- It's a commercial organisation of very doubtful notability. If you're that bothered I'll replace the db-spam with db-corp. Either way, I don't see any reason for the article.TheLongTone (talk) 16:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- +Please recheak it
- Yeah, promotional guff.TheLongTone (talk) 16:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Why you have deleted this page (Akbeh Football Club) if you are professional in the wikipedia i'am not like you ok and i'am beginner ok so if you can help me, help me ok 🙊🙉🙈 Douaihy Michel (talk) 16:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
You removed an inline link to gigposters.com from my Todd Slater article. I included the link as there is no Wikipedia article on gigposters.com and I felt it was relevant and would be useful to some readers. Do Wikipedia guidelines recommend the avoidance of inline links to external sites or did you remove it for another reason?
You also made two other changes: "aged 24 " -> " when aged 24" and "Slater's" -> "His". These appear to be minor changes to writing style rather than corrections. If you believe them to be corrections please explain the basis for that belief, otherwise I will undo the changes; I believe the role of Wikipedians is to contribute to the richness and accuracy of information contained in Wikipedia, not to impose their personal writing styles on other contributors. Ukebloke (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Deutsch de la Meurthe Cup[edit]
I thought that, as early aviation competitions were your sort of thing, I'd just flag up Deutsch de la Meurthe Cup which has sprung up recently. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up...I think I started writing an article on this a while back, but got bogged down in uncertainties...TheLongTone (talk) 11:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Copyediting/Wikilinking[edit]
Hi. Could you please chime in here and see if you can offer some help. I'm rather worried that we are about to loose a new, prolific creator of serious articles. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
There was an issue brought to AN where I have mentioned one of your actions of A7 tagging as a step in the whole sequence of events. —SpacemanSpiff 13:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, the system already told me but thanks anyway....I don't think I've anything to contribute there!TheLongTone (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Princess Princep of Nepal[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Princess Princep of Nepal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Several credible assertions of importance (a lower standard than notability). This needs to go to AFD. Thank you. Courcelles (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
_------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi
thank you for your work.
I made a mistake with the title of the article Mamdouh adwan I should capitalized the the A in the sure name in the title
how can we fix it it?
thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marooon (talk • contribs) 14:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This page Mit'hat Mema should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]
This page should not be speedily deleted because Mit’hat Mema is an Rector of an public university in Albania, the University of Durrës. He is a famous researcher. For Mr. Mema exist 36,800 results (articles) in Google, mostly in Albanian language. --Bunker92 (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Gold Series[edit]
What sort of information do you need me to add to the article? I am searching through the internet as we speak. I need time to add to the article. Deltasim (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. You may have clicked the wrong thing or misread the article - A7 doesn't apply to software (more's the pity...). Peridon (talk) 17:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
RE : Speedy deletion nomination of IPG DentistEdu Technique[edit]
Hello
My article has been removed from wikipedia because it seemed to be promotional. Earlier this year the article was removed because it was inactive and that happened because i didn't know that i had to change/edit once in a while.But it wasn't reviewed as promotional. I surely respect your review.As it's for a medical purpose based on researches and official books recognized by dental community, i would like you to notice me the parts of the article need to be changed in order for my article to be approved and be on wikipedia once again.
Looking forward for your reply.
DEIpg (talk) 07:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy tag placed on Desolation Angels Rock Band[edit]
Hi, you just placed a tag on Desolation Angels Rock Band while at the same time I was moving the page to Draft which is Draft:Desolation Angels Rock Band because the author of the page mentioned it in the edit summary as "I'm creating a Wiki page for the rock band Desolation Angels . . . It may take some time!)".Since its a new user and is not aware of our Wikipedia guidelines to create an article but may want to contribute. So, I didn't want to discourage the editor by speedy and so put it in the Draft space. I have undid the speedy, if no substantial page improvement is done in some time. Anyone of us can speedy it as the page in its current is clearly unencyclopaedic. I have already put a speedy on Desolation Angels Rock Band. Thanks Peppy Paneer (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Entekrishi.com[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Entekrishi.com, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 17:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm NottNott. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:TDH9213 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 14:28, 27 September 2015 (U
=== 28 September 2015 == Request to revert deletion
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chrysaalis_i_math&action=edit&redlink=1
I would like to bring it in your notice that i am a contributor for education and school project of India . I strongly feel the requirement of such information on Wikipedia, it will help lots of parents in India. If you fell its written in promotional manners i will review it again.Please undelete it. Thanks boomboom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishwa 777 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC) boomboom
for clarify the purpose of your editting[edit]
Dear, Recently you have editted the page Hormizd, the Martyr. Thank you for the language corrections. I have seen that you have entirely deleted the following sentence: "The new regulations came into effect on the basis of the Session 2, Canon 10 and Session 3, Canon 14 of the Synod of Diamper. Session 3, Canon 14 severely condemned Rabban hormizd." Is there any reason behind your elimination of the entire sentence? Analyst2000 (talk) 14:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Too much detail, slowing up the flow. Topic is linked to.TheLongTone (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Edit summaries[edit]
Hi TheLongTone,
I notice you have made some very good copy edits to Architectus Science Faculty Building UTS which improve the article. Thanks for that. They also showed a very new editor how the collaborative process achieves such improvement. However, your edit summaries, while amusing to experienced editors, could be off-putting to the point of counter-productive for a newbie. So I just wanted to highlight that this article is the very first effort of a new editor who is trying to master everything at once, including the appropriate tone for an architecture article. The sources for architecture articles tend to use pretentious and jargon-ridden language so it takes extra effort to rewrite the facts plainly, and this newbie has just begun to learn. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 23:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Mea culpa. Writing plainly about most subjects is a great deal harder than stringing togrther a bunch of words in the hope that they will impress. Snippiness in this case is I guess fuelled by a feeling that nobody writes that sort of guff unless they are being paid money to do so...it smells like copyvio.TheLongTone (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
re Leadin (company) page[edit]
Hi
You have deleted this page with no real explanation or suggestion for improvement. Please can you give either an explanation why this page has been deleted or guidance as to how to improve the page. The page is based on numerous example company pages and so I see no clear reason why it has been deleted?
Thanks for your reply however I can not see which admin has deleted my page - any help is much appreciated to allow me to discuss the reasons why with them directly — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASarfas (talk • contribs) 15:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- User:Ritchie333 and User:Peridon. But read WP:CORP, wp's notability guidelines.TheLongTone (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- @ASarfas: I have restored the article as a draft submission at Draft:Leadin (company), where it can be worked on without a threat of deletion. The BBC source is a good source to use, but we need many more in order to prove the company has a major enough significance for a worldwide encyclopedia. Anyway, when you are happy that the draft is improved, you can click on the "Submit this draft" button for an experienced editor to review it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Credible claim of significance vs Notability[edit]
I think it'd be worth going over WP:A7, as you may be under the impression that it's a notability standard. Directly from the guideline, "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.[7] This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability."
The "lower standard than notability" is critical. No, the actor that we were referring to was likely not notable. But there was a credible claim of significance, and for notability cases speedy deletion is not an appropriate process. Speedy deletion should only be used in cases where nobody says why it's actually important. In this case, it's clearly important because she played a role in a notable film, and not as an extra. Appable (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Not what I would call a credible claim of notability. Which is why A7 is appropriate.TheLongTone (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Significance isn't notability. It means a claim that reveals that a person, object, etc may be notable after some searching, even if notability is not established. WP:A7 was never intended to be used for articles where something may not have notability established. It's for articles that don't say anything about why it's important, like "this person made a 3d printer. his favorite color is blue and he likes ice cream." That never says why anyone should care, whereas actors within films (not as extras) clearly play a role that may mean larger coverage in print or online sources. Even though notability isn't established in the latter, it's a lot more obvious why the media would cover an actor than a random person with no significance illustrated.
- That's why the guideline was added. It's probably the most misused criterion for speedy deletion, I agree with a user's essay on the topic. As you can tell from my position on the AfD, I don't care about the article being deleted (no, it really isn't significant). I just want the correct process to be used, because misusing speedy deletion is a slippery slope to censorship. The community-based AfD (and to a lesser extent PROD) is much better. Appable (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
About the PepperTap page[edit]
Hi, The Long Tone, I have noticed your tag on the page. What should be included more to improve the page? As the subject has news coverage available, I am confused about adding the necessary things. Please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Incredible Help Online (talk • contribs) 12:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello TheLongTone. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at PepperTap. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.
Not only was the page tagged far too quickly, but buried amongst the numerous other citations in the article as it existed at the time of creation were multiple citations to independent, third-party, reliable sources — in other words, it has been demonstrated that PepperTap not only meets the significance standard referred to in the speedy deletion criteria definitions, it also meets the higher notability standard. Please exercise more care with future tagging. Thank you, GrammarFascist contribstalk 21:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles S. Strong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lapland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Boyd & Jenerette deletion[edit]
I wish you would reconsider your deletion of Boyd & Jenerette. I've been editing for years and have never had a page removed so quickly. I contested the speedy deletion with no dialog following. There were plenty of creditable sources, and the firm is of some type of importance to the city of Jacksonville, being that it is the largest locally based firm in the city. If this age is worthy of deletion than so are a whole lot more that did not get swept up in such a stringent filter. Mathew105601 (talk) 23:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I also made a few additions to the page since the tag was put in place. I'm willing to work on making the page work. It is a business of significance in Jacksonville. Mathew105601 (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2015(UTC)
- As I'm sure you know I merely tagged this for deletion; I did so because it seemed like an entirely ordinary company. And the company may be of significance in Jacksonville, but that does not mean it is of global significance. The deleting admin, incidentally, was User:Just ChillingTheLongTone (talk) 15:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Somerset College Page[edit]
Hi There,
Thanks for the help! I was basically copy-pasting off their website (http://www.somersetcollege.org/), so quite a bit of the stuff was unedited. Thanks for the assistance.
Rhyswilliamsza (talk) 18:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Alright, will do.
Thank you.
Rhyswilliamsza (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
2 Headed Dog[edit]
This is a regularly performing comedy troupe comprised of four different celebrities, including one original cast member of MadTV. They recently opened the huge comedy festival "Festival Supreme", all of which I have noted. How is this contestable importance? Quirkinitup (talk) 15:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Courtney
- Of course you think they are important: they are paying you.TheLongTone (talk) 15:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
There's no need to be rude, I think they're important because they are. They were headliners at Festival Supreme 2015 (http://lineup.festivalsupreme.com/), all of their members have their own Wiki page and imdb and are celebrities in their own right.Quirkinitup (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Rude???? Get real. TheLongTone (talk) 15:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
There's no need to be flippant; you accused me of being biased because I am a social media liaison for the troupe when I'm providing evidence of their importance. I find that rude. You may look at the pages of Craig Anton, Mark Fite, Dave Allen, and Jim Turner. You can see they are all very clearly successful comedians in their own right already. This is their successful troupe that has already performed among the likes of Tenacious D.Quirkinitup (talk) 15:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- I was not being flippant. I merely stated that, as an employee, you were doing a job of work which I assume involves a degree of belief in the value of what you are doing. And read WP:NOTINHERITED.TheLongTone (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Incidentally, if I was being rude I might point out that "I think they're important because they are" is the most absurd argument for notability I have ever heard.TheLongTone (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Why is this an argument about notability? There was never an AfD or PROD discussion for this article. It was only tagged for speedy deletion, and yet WP:A7 never talks about notability at all, only a credible claim of significance. Of course notability is not inherited, but a credible claim of significance can be inherited. The meaning of credible claim of significance is to prove that it's possible for notability to be established, and having multiple notable members means that the organization may have some secondary reliable sources covering it. Appable (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Because the troupe requires a measure of notability to be worth a standalone article; otherwise it is only worth mentions in the articles on the individuals.TheLongTone (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- The problem that User:Quirkinitup expressed wasn't whether it should be deleted or not, but rather whether it should be speedy deleted or not. Speedy deletion A7/A9 are explicitly for articles without a credible claim of significance (and only specific categories). While it's likely not notable and I'd be surprised if it managed to survive a deletion discussion, it still met the lower standard of "credible claim of significance" and should never have been tagged for speedy deletion under the A7 criterion. Appable (talk) 18:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Ek Ladki Badnaam Si[edit]
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ek Ladki Badnaam Si, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to films. Consider AfD. From the talk page, it looks as though a PROD would be contested. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah...there are many times one knows a PROD will disappear. Incidentally, why no speedies for films. Not like songs which can generally be changed to redirects.TheLongTone (talk) 14:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of T-Hub[edit]
This page should not be speedily deleted because... this is a government non-profit entity useful for startups. it is similar to IHub. thanq. --Pranayraj1985 (talk) 16:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]
Hi, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Softberry, Inc., and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 06:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- It was not done to disrespect you. I un-reviewed it simply because the editor added a lot more information than at the original tagging.--Cahk (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- No offence taken!TheLongTone (talk) 15:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- It was not done to disrespect you. I un-reviewed it simply because the editor added a lot more information than at the original tagging.--Cahk (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
King Croc[edit]
Hi. Thanks for cleansweeping. Although, it seems you accidentally "killed" the word "nothing". I have put it back. ;) Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 17:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ha! nobody is perfect!TheLongTone (talk) 17:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mockplus, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I think that's editable. . Thank you. GedUK 13:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Alexis Ayaana[edit]
Hello TheLongTone, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alexis Ayaana, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The references listed are enough to indicate that they *may* be notable. CSD is a lower threshold. She may still fail at AfD, which is where you should take this next if you think it should be deleted. . You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GedUK 13:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but you can't use A7 on a house. A7 is only for people, groups of people, named animals, web content, and organised events. It's prod or AfD for anything else. Peridon (talk) 15:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- I thought that I could Prod this as a business....oh well.TheLongTone (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've sorted out your 'notinherited' link at the AfD. Hope you don't mind. Peridon (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Of course not. I'm an incompetent klutz & need all the help I can get!TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've sorted out your 'notinherited' link at the AfD. Hope you don't mind. Peridon (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Thank you for making very important small edits on pages. Matthewethanchowtoy (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |
User Boxes[edit]
Hey Long Tone. Thank you for your contributions. I am asking a favour. Could you help me get some User Boxes for my user page? Thanks Matthew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy (talk • contribs) 00:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well I just cut & paste the code from other users' pages. Creating your own is a bit more faff & to be honest I can't rememeber where on wikioedia the information on making them is to be found. Incidentally, there must be loads known about that ship, in terms of stuff like Lloyds register of shipping & so forth.TheLongTone (talk) 00:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
SM[edit]
hI, Why nominated for deletion? I have a few refrence and her resume.. so what you more needed?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Season's Greetings[edit]
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Season's greetings[edit]
All the best for the festive season and new year.
— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleting the article "Andrei Siderski"[edit]
Hi, could you please explain why article "Andrei Siderski" was deleted? There were added 4 references for third party resources, including municipal library and online magazines. Thank you.
- The deleting admin deleted it because they judged it to be unambiguous advertising. FYI I merely tagged it as referenceless, which I assume is an issue you dealt with.TheLongTone (talk) 14:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Zeppelin help[edit]
Can you add any context to this image from the Library of Congress, it is still at Flickr, if you can't view it, I will move it to Wikimedia Commons. [5] --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think that the identification as L33 at Little Wigborough is fairly convincing. However, if memory serves there are many superior photos of the wreck on the Imperial War Museum website.TheLongTone (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Hiral Shanti Mei[edit]
the articles fully satisfies the notability criteria, Its about a noted model, a noted Hindi film actress, television anchor, and the article is backed by national news paper publications as inline citations) --Luxpapa (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hiral Shanti Mei or Hiral Mei, the considered opinion of the Wikipedia is a resounding "meh". Which is why it has been deleted for the third time.TheLongTone (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited De Havilland DH.71 Tiger Moth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air raid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Origins: Discovery[edit]
You once prodded Origins: Discovery and then took it to AfD. I thought I'd let you know that the article has been recreated, and you might want to check whether it's any better this time. Schwede66 17:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for Speedy Deletion of My article Miyabi Japanese Steakhouse And Sushi Bar[edit]
Hi, I noticed that you tagged my article for speedy deletion. I'm relatively new to wikipedia, and I don't fully understand how everything works, so I'm a bit confused as to why you thought that it should be deleted. If you could help clarify so that I can improve in the future, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks, Schuddeboomw (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- I simply did not think it was notable...see WP:GNG.TheLongTone (talk)
non-words[edit]
it would have befitted both of us to better look left and right before we started typing. the difference however is: i tried to contribute, you tried to erase. -- Kku 07:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- mehTheLongTone (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk page length[edit]
Hi TheLongTone. This talk page is getting rather long - over half a million bytes of text content - and as a result it's rather difficult to load on slower internet connections and/or computers. Could the content of this be archived soon? I see there's already a few archives of this talk page, so I'm guessing it's not too hard to do. Thanks, Appable (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)