Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:LOCKPAGE)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Awareness and its first-link loop

    (Potentially)

    Reason: High levels of IP disruption to Awareness, reordering links to "save" the philosophy effect despite consensus (see talk page) for the current link order. I recommend one-month temporary semi-protection to Awareness until IP editors realize such efforts are futile.
    Saving the philosophy effect could disrupt Mind, Thought, and Consciousness, because editing those articles could save the philosophy effect. There already has been one such edit to Mind, although protecting the chain is not warranted right now. However, if such edits become pervasive, I would suggest one month temporary semi-protection. Closetside (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Vijayta Films

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Anil Sharma (director)

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Unbound Gravel

    Reason: An editor who appears to be too close to the subject of the article is reverting relevant contributions and abusing the anti-vandalism system Userhxj8v0o12a (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    April 2024 Chernihiv missile strike

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:RUSUKR Wiiformii (talk) 02:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Dream Island

    Reason: Many people (mostly IP editors) have vandalized the article to add information about BFDI, but have not seen WP:BFDI. As a result, the page should be protected. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Splinters from an Ever-Changing Face

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term disruption from Colombia IPs. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/CaMI!oWave2015. Binksternet (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of teams that have overcome 3–0 series deficits

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Likely to continue to be a magnet for non-constructive edits through Game 7 of the Stanley Cup. Walsh90210 (talk) 03:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian (talk) 08:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    United States Disciplinary Barracks

    Reason: Recent edit war 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Vandalise

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 03:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    NOTE: That page redirects to an already semi-protected page. The redirect, not the target, is the page in which semi-protection is requested. Yes, I know any admin seeing this is probably competent enough to know, but non-admins seeing this might not be competent enough to know. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Glorious Purpose (Loki season 2)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Dr Disrespect

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is currently under controversy, getting many unsubstantiated page edits. DrawWikiped(talk) 03:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Support - New, serious allegations have emerged regarding subject's ban from Twitch, leading to a wave of IP/new user vandalism today.
     "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  12:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2024 NRL season

    Reason: Persistent IP sockpuppetry PhinsUp23 (talk) 04:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Tiyyar

    Reason: Request Extended Page Protection due to constant addition of unsourced original research (already tagged as "WP:OR" by another editor) and removal of sourced content by unregistered IPs. Many vandalization attempts by newly made IPs is also a problem. Piyush Chekavar (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Valkyrie Anatomia

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hapoel Tel Aviv F.C.

    Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 07:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Tadhana

    Reason: Persistent addition of insignificant information from IP users, which breaks Wikipedia:DIRECTORY. Hotwiki (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Umro Ayyar - A New Beginning

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Jeon Yeo-been

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Also reporting to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meandhowl. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The Greatest of All Time

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals have returned now as the film promotions are underway. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 10:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Graeme Wood (journalist)

    Reason: Vandalism (in violation of BLP policies) of this page has continued, mostly from unregistered users, following a previous 10-day protection. Requesting extension by an additional month. See talk page for more information. Domeditrix (talk) 10:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Škorpion

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion/socking from dynamic IP. Loafiewa (talk) 10:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Awareness

    Semi-protection: Edit-warring focused on the first sentence because of a recent YouTube video. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Idi Othman Guda

    Reason: Fear of page vandalism. Saif idi othman (talk) 12:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: @Saif idi othman: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Turkmeneli

    Block: User Semsûrî keeps on reverting edits and claiming that the map and Anthem should be sourced (they're very clear and don't need to be sourced)....... . Kirkukturk3 (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    See editor's talk page. 20:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

    Mir-Hossein Mousavi

    Reason: The protection was put up to stop a sockpuppet account from edit and it's been 15 years and i haven't seen any of that happening. User1432532758 (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    San Francisco

    Unprotection: Whitelock was added 7 years ago for disruptive editing, and there no longer is as much disruptive editing. For the article of an important American city, it's probably better not to whitelock. Josethewikier (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Brianna Wu

    Temporary full protection: I'm not against a goldlock protection and I can understand arbcom's decision, however it would be ideal if the protection is temporary (even if it's 4 years or something like that); if that fails immediately, then should we consider a definitive indefinite goldlock protection. Josethewikier (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It already is Indefinately Fully protected. 74.14.6.233 (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Israel–Hamas war

    Under "Long term goals of Hamas", please replace "with founding Hamas members[who?] saying that" by " with founding Hamas member Mahmoud al-Zahar saying that" FcMeOH (talk) 12:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.