Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 15 February 17 >

February 16[edit]

Template:European Youth Olympic Festival/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 23. ✗plicit 00:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian first ministers by time in office[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only sort of navbox of its kind. Remains unused and don't think the creator has finished this template. Normally, I think a template for its subject isn't necessary as we normally just have politicians by time in office mainly be a list article than have a corresponding template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oh yes, I was going to do something with this but abandoned it. Please delete. Superegz (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baseball5[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first template is unused and only has three links of relevance to the subject. Two outside of the main article within the sidebar. Baseball5 concepts just duplicates Template:Baseball. And International Baseball5 only has four links of relevance. Not a single one passes the basic navbox or sidebar requirements for navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Currently we have hardly any content on Baseball5, not enough to warrant any navboxes, let alone three. Nigej (talk) 08:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cartoon Network creators[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 23. ✗plicit 00:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Central Malayo–Polynesian languages[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicates Template:Central Malayo-Polynesian languages. Both created by the same user and yet the one that is being used has been around since 2015 while the template nominated was created in December 2021 for some reason. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Clearly we don't need two. Alternative would be a redirect from one to the other. Nigej (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • REdirect, perhaps this is a cut-and-paste move? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean cut-and-paste? Do you mean the dash in the title? If so, then the template that's used should reflect the em dash for the mainspace article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 AFC Women's Asian Cup – Repechage[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Content is now at 2022 AFC Women's Asian Cup#Play-offs Nigej (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Africa PR-instructions[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old version of the instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Peer review. Nigej (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cabinet of Juha Sipilä[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. This is only one of this style covering Finnish cabinets and is surplus to Sipilä Cabinet and succession boxes in individual articles. Nigej (talk) 07:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Basketball Classic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for an event that hasn't even been played once yet. Lets have a handful of articles first before considering a navbox. Nigej (talk) 07:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Safari version table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates no longer used at Safari version history. Nigej (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I created these templates in hopes of improving the Safari version history page and never got to completing them. I likely won't have the time to complete them for the foreseeable future. I'm okay with the templates being deleted. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shape-note hymnody[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar from 2014. Not as many articles as shown since a few are redirects to Sacred Harp. Nigej (talk) 07:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shariati family tree[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused family tree with one blue link and otherwise non-notable people. Nigej (talk) 07:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sharif family tree[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused family tree covered more concisely by the {{Sharif family}} navbox. Nigej (talk) 07:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shenzhen administrative divisions[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content exists at List of administrative divisions of Shenzhen#County-level divisions. Nigej (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SignWriting family tree[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused diagram covered better by the {{Sign language writing systems}} navbox. Nigej (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Slovak polls: Development of individual parties[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date unused graphs related to Opinion polling for the next Slovak parliamentary election. Single use so need substituting there (if required) and deleting. Nigej (talk) 08:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Smallcaps all/doc/Smallcaps and sc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of {{Smallcaps}} and {{Smallcaps all}} (aka sc). Already covered at Template:Smallcaps all/doc#Comparison of the case transformation templates. Mentioned in a couple of talk pages, eg Template talk:Smallcaps2 Nigej (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Korean rank[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table of South Korean military ranks, covered at Comparative military ranks of Korea and Republic of Korea Armed Forces#Ranks Nigej (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southern Ontario Nav[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused clickable map of Southern Ontario from 2009. Seems unlikely it ever worked. Nigej (talk) 08:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sports film[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{Sports films}}, created by the same editor on the same day. Nigej (talk) 08:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sri Lanka record in Test Matches[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused list of Sri Lanka record in Test Matches by opponent. Not updated since 2010. {{Sri Lanka Test cricket records by opponent}} is a more compact version. Nigej (talk) 09:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:St. Xavier's School, Patna[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox for St. Xavier's High School, Patna. Really only the one article padded out with vaguely related articles. Nigej (talk) 09:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:St Dominic Heritage Trail Routemap[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused routemap for St Dominic Heritage Trail in Cornwall but we don't seem to have any content. Nigej (talk) 09:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Start U.S. presidential ticket box 2016[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{Start U.S. presidential ticket box}}. Others in the set were deleted here Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 3#Template:U.S. presidential ticket box row 2016 Nigej (talk) 10:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Steroid hormones (endogenous)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox competing with {{Steroid hormones}} (Corticosteroids/Sex steroids). Probably overly detailed for a navbox. Nigej (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sticky text[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and perhaps not needed. Nigej (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Central Pulse team nav[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 23. ✗plicit 12:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PortalWindow[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template with questionable application, used only on the creator's userpage. Subst and delete. Stifle (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The creator has now been indefinitely blocked as a sock. Stifle (talk) 11:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - useless template -- Whpq (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northern Ireland squad at the 2019 Netball World Cup[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Squad templates for non-medaling Netball teams. Previous consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 6#Template:Angola Squad 2002 FIBA World Championship, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 29#Template:Slovenia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship (and at other TfDs noted in these articles) was that these sort of templates should be restricted to medal-winning teams. Squads are already listed in articles like 2019 Netball World Cup squads. Nigej (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of editors/readers find these type of templates useful for navigation. Otherwise there would no navigation boxes on Wiki at all. Do I really need to explain how they work ? Plus judging by the amount you have nominated for deletion you clearly have nothing better to do. Working from home ? User:Djln Djln (talk) 16:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per pervious TfD consensus. Teams that haven't won a medal in a major competition don't need a navbox. Any team composition for any tournament, league or match, should be added to that specific article in a relevant section. Gonnym (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable teams. Didn't win tournament/championship. Clearly no need for navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Summer Olympics Squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to {{New Zealand women's rugby sevens squad 2020 Summer Olympics}} created a few minutes earlier by the same user. Nigej (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Mughal-Rajput War[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar from 2011 relating to a part of the Mughal-Rajput Wars. The {{Mughal Empire}} navbox is used in the three articles. Nigej (talk) 13:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canadian Parliament legend[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused legend from 2011 relating to the parties in the Canadian Parliament. Difficult to imagine there's any benefit in keeping it. Nigej (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Daihatsu Europe timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline for Daihatsu Europe. Not updated since 2013. {{Daihatsu timeline}} is being used. Nigej (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Descendants of George, Duke of Clarence[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to Alternative successions of the English and British crown#Descendants of George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence but the textual description there is much easier to understand. Nigej (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: broken and unused in article space. DrKay (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USC Trojans men's ice hockey navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no parent article USC Trojans men's ice hockey, and only one link, making it useless for navigation. Nigej (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. The link isn't a core page of USC Trojans men. Gonnym (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sedimentary basins of Ecuador[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with nothing like enough links to be useful for navigation. Nigej (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and only one link. Gonnym (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments. FWIW, there is a series of Template Navs for Sedimentary basins of South American Countries by the same OP in Category:Geology navigational boxes. I checked a few famous NA basins to see if they have similar Navs (they don't).
IDK what Andrybak's activities portend.
IveGoneAway (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@IveGoneAway, if there is something unclear with Special:Diff/1070877009 – it is just a categorization edit per WP:CATSPECIFIC from genetic "X templates" to more specific "X navigational boxes" since Template:Sedimentary basins of Ecuador is a navigational box. The edit also includes semi-automatic wikitext cleanup. —⁠andrybak (talk) 12:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing wrong with a navboxes for sedimentary basins in a country. However, this specific one has only 1 link (and other issues, but that is besides the point). Gonnym (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISRCOTW article[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Liz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per comment at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 15#Template:ISRCOTW. Nigej (talk) 14:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unneeded. You could have just added it to the previous nom :) Gonnym (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom cases day of report chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chart of the number of Covid cases in the UK. Not updated since July 2021. Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom is maintained. Nigej (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom cumulative cases day of report chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charts of the number of Covid cumulative cases and deaths in the UK. Not updated since July 2021. Superseded by {{COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom cases and deaths chart}} which are not maintained either but that's not the issue here. Nigej (talk) 17:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Trinidad and Tobago Cases by date from 1 January[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused charts of the number of cases/deaths/recoveries in Trinidad and Tobago mostly 2020 and nothing past February 2021. COVID-19 pandemic in Trinidad and Tobago has more up-to-date information. Nigej (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unneeded. We use other charts in the article now. Joshua Shah (talk) 04:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/London - England, United Kingdom medical cases chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 pandemic data/London medical cases chart not updated since 2020/May 2021 respectively. Nigej (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Saint Vincent and Grenadines new cases chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused charts of the number of new cases/recoveries/active cases in Saint Vincent and Grenadines to 2021. COVID-19 pandemic in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has more up-to-date information. Nigej (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The grumpy award/preload[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. ✗plicit 23:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm missing something but it doesn't seem to serve a useful purpose. Unused. Nigej (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Christian denominations in Finland[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Religion in Finland. I added links that were not on the main religion template from Christian denominations. The religion in Finland template serves a broader and wider purpose than having one for a specific religion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No longer required. Nigej (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_16&oldid=1073675269"