User:Relyimah/Dashboard
Menu: User Page | Talk Page (+) | Sandbox | Reference | Subpages | Contributions (alt) | Dashboard
This page is optimised for Mozilla Firefox and a screen resolution of 1280x1024 (minimum: 1024x768)
CAVEAT: all the |show=
parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]
Administrative backlog[edit]
WP:AIV[edit]
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- 83.137.7.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 71.202.49.194 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 186.28.29.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 103.82.121.113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 198.150.25.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 132 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of all categories, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses from educational institutions. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:100d:a120:c822:bd8c:3721:d873:eb6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Lettffedredd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported[edit]
- 86.43.64.151 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism only account. Nswix (talk) 19:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- vandalism - only account. Cassiopeia talk 01:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- 204.9.25.211 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Hatchet (novel) (diff): vandalism after final warning. Note: On Hatchet (novel), 204.9.25.210 also edited the article. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 82.5.77.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On ITV plc: vandalism after final warning. Waylon (was) (here) 20:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2A01:CB00:8A42:AE00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) - Persistent unexplained removal of content, continued after block expired, see edit history of The Princess Switch. Waxworker (talk) 22:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:14D:4182:6830:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) - Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 22:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- 105.191.93.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent addition of unsourced WP:OR and ignoring warnings. Likely a block-evading sock of Zeblade12. Skitash (talk) 22:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Surčinski monstrum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Kolega2357/Velimir Ivanivic sock, see contribs on srwiki and hrwiki. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 00:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- CringeVirgin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) All edits vandalism, strongly suggests another nascent vandalism-only account--Mr Fink (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- 124.104.137.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – IP sock. Long-term abuse (shouting: tarmac, bobbit, rock, etc.). Block evasion of 112.202.98.189, 124.217.39.33, 112.202.100.145, and about a hundred more IPs. Editor changes IPs frequently. Usually targets Atelier articles, but branches out into other usual suspects too. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- 99.169.162.16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning TheXug (talk) 02:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Obesefurry (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Also see filter log. Panian513 02:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- 59.154.62.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Survivor: Samoa: ScottishFinnishRadish, I believe this is the same Australian IP you blocked just a few hours ago. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs[edit]
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 0 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 5 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 2 |
Other candidates | 3 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 22 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 12 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
Bot-reported[edit]
- ETSG Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported[edit]
- Andriatupola (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Real name, represents Andria Tupola. Pahunkat (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 22:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- PMC-Mehrdad.Kia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) - advertising 2003 LN6 21:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Amethi Lok Sabha constituency[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Aranmanai 4[edit]
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. The article is being targeted as the film is to be released tomorrow. See version history. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protected through the opening weekend. BusterD (talk) 22:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh[edit]
Permanent semi - protection: Persistent vandalism because subject of this article is very controversial. Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Prajwal Revanna[edit]
Permanent semi - protection: vandalism and subject is now alleged is a very controversial sex scandal. Pachu Kannan (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I will, however, leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
H. D. Revanna[edit]
Permanent semi - protection: This subject is also alleged in the same sex scandal. Pachu Kannan (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Will, again, put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Author[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since mid-March, this talk page has been subjected to a flood of irrelevant contributions, mostly in Arabic. Unfortunately, there's no single IP range to focus on. Largoplazo (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
List of highest-grossing Bangladeshi films[edit]
Reason: This article is the victim of low quality ip edits and edit wars for several weeks. Recently I have seen the act of the distortion of changing reliable source based information from a ip and I believe like previous weeks new edit wars are going to happen. The same thing happened in previous years where I had to request for page protection and the page was protected several times from lowest a week to maximum a month. Now there is a need to be protect the page for more period. Mehedi Abedin 17:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: Better to lock down this BLP due to recurring IP appearances which causing edit wars. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor[edit]
Reason: Persistent IP reverting to unsourced dubious claim Mangoe (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
X-Men '97[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping anonymous editor that keeps removing a bit about a character being non-binary. Warnings to one of the addresses haven't worked. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pardon me, I was think of another article. This has been the same address so far. Not that warnings did work. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- It was requested over a month ago as well, due to the same type of vandalism. [1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- It was requested over a month ago as well, due to the same type of vandalism. [1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Dane Baptiste[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – subject was recently cancelled. Launchballer 20:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Tom & Jerry (2021 film)[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stupid edit warring that's devolved into ad hominem. CRBoyer 23:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
List of the largest municipalities in Canada by population[edit]
- List of the largest municipalities in Canada by population (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper is engaging in an edit war. Page should be protected to avoid further disruption. CycloneYoris talk! 23:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP editor. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:E126:3101:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Superman (2025 film)[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from various IPs after prior protection lapsed. Same unsourced/unreliable additions as before. Longer protection would be preferred. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Bridget Marquardt[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: IPs adding unsourced personal info. Trivialist (talk) 00:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Bgsu98[edit]
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing despite repeated warnings to stay off my talk page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:E126:3101:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Watermelon (Palestinian symbol)[edit]
Reason: ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 00:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Atelier Resleriana[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Mitch Love[edit]
Reason: Consistent campaign of IP vandalism. Has been protected previously on more than one occasion. The first edit after unprotection has been the same vandalism. IceBergYYC (talk) 01:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Japan–United States relations[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP editor. Would like to encourage Talk page discussion. Rotary Engine talk 02:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Min Hee-jin[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of non-constructive edits due to recent events. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khymani James[edit]
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Article this is about is protected per WP:ARBPIA and this discussion/article is quite closely tied to that conflict. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
David Leeson[edit]
Reason: page was protected indefinitely 2+ years ago for BLP violations; the page's subject was recently deceased at that time. the (sole?) offender was permanently blocked from editing. 173.175.200.238 (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Unprotected Please notify me if we need to raise the protection level once again. BusterD (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
4 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA[edit]
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
WP:RFP[edit]
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled[edit]
User:B3251[edit]
- B3251 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am making a request on behalf of myself, as I sometimes create new articles pretty often (mostly New Brunswick-related). As of right now I have 66 live articles, and I have expanded plenty more. I have had a few deletions: two articles when I was brand new to editing & one list I created in mid-2023 (due to not completely understanding WP:BLPCRIME at the time). Otherwise, my articles have been pretty straightforward and vary in quality, with most being Start/C-class by the time I publish them. I had a little bit of a rough start when it came to "notability knowledge", as many do, but overtime I have grown to have an understanding of WP:GNG and WP:MOS when writing articles. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
User:TheGreatestLuvofAll[edit]
- TheGreatestLuvofAll (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created at least 25 articles that follow WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG about singers and albums. I am familiar with WP:C, WP:V, and WP:BURDEN in my articles, without copying content without permission, and I make sure my info is sourced in any articles I created. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Princess of Ara[edit]
- Princess of Ara (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Prince of Erebor[edit]
- Prince of Erebor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 75 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor(The Book of Mazarbul) 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed[edit]
User:Vinayviniyl[edit]
- Vinayviniyl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
To edit article about authentic information. <!To edit article about authentic information. > Vinay viniyl (talk) 07:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! — xaosflux Talk 10:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
User:Cleo Cooper[edit]
- Cleo Cooper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have experience in patrolling recent changes for vandalism and other forms of nonconstructive editing, and other places for content policies, using various gadgets. It would be nice to have the ability to properly review edits on pages with pending changes protection. Cleo Cooper (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Morris80315436[edit]
- Morris80315436 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have experience reverting problematic edits before, and I believe that I can do more with this new role. I have read WP:PCCRITERIA and the related guidelines. Thanks for taking the time of reading this application! Morris80315436 (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Sunnyboi18[edit]
- Sunnyboi18 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.
I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Allan Nonymous[edit]
- Allan Nonymous (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have a history of cleaning up grammar, removing and refactoring uncited content and fixing citations. I'm hoping to maybe expand my editing scope a bit. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rollback[edit]
User:Cleo Cooper[edit]
- Cleo Cooper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Aloha! I've spent a while going through recent changes and I consistently warn editors with RedWarn. My understanding is that the rollbacker permission can help with this by allowing access to special tools like AntiVandal and speed things up, especially when I need to mass-revert all the edits of a user. Coop (talk) 22:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Cleo Cooper: Looks good overall, however please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Done -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:RainGuest[edit]
- RainGuest (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I monitor Recent Changes, used to do it very frequently and getting back into it recently. RainGuest (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months/years at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Lynch44[edit]
- Lynch44 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been reverting vandalism as an account for about a month now, and have familiarized myself with Twinkle as well. Also note the 20,000 edits, mostly anti-vandal, that I made as an IP. Lynch44 (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:CanonNi[edit]
- CanonNi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I'm re-applying for Rollback rights a month after my previous was declined. During the past month, I've actively patrolled RecentChanges, reverting bad-faith edits and warning editors with Ultraviolet, and increasing my edit count to over 6500. I've also gained a thorough understanding of relevant policies, such as WP:VAN. In addition, I was granted AfC reviewer and NPP rights.
The main reason I would like Rollback rights is to revert vandalism and disruptive editing quicker and easier, as well as the usage of more advanced tools such as AntiVandal and Huggle.
Thanks for considering my request! '''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 14:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 14:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- The user addressed that above. Not helpful. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TheTechie: Please don't tell the bot which auto comments about past declines that it's not helpful. Additionally, please try to avoid commenting on other's applications unless you believe there's something relevant a reviewing admin should know that they're unlikely to find when evaluating a user. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hey man im josh thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TheTechie: Please don't tell the bot which auto comments about past declines that it's not helpful. Additionally, please try to avoid commenting on other's applications unless you believe there's something relevant a reviewing admin should know that they're unlikely to find when evaluating a user. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- The user addressed that above. Not helpful. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily Thank you for asking. The first edit in question was in good faith, so I thought there was no need for a warning. However, the second and third edits are indeed my mistake. However, most of my reverts come with a warning (e.g. 1, 2, 3) but I'll still make sure to warn editors whenever needed in the future.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 23:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I promise to always warn or notify editors when reverting their edits, no matter if it is good-faith or not. Thank you for the heads-up.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 01:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I promise to always warn or notify editors when reverting their edits, no matter if it is good-faith or not. Thank you for the heads-up.
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily Thank you for asking. The first edit in question was in good faith, so I thought there was no need for a warning. However, the second and third edits are indeed my mistake. However, most of my reverts come with a warning (e.g. 1, 2, 3) but I'll still make sure to warn editors whenever needed in the future.
[edit]
Policies and links