User talk:Anarchyte/Archive 7

A year ago ...
video games and cleanup
	... you were recipient; no. 1680 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Template:Y

Just a note that your edit broke the redirect, which caused DYK nominations to break. Redirects with {{Redirect category shell}} do not need protection templates, as the protection level is automatically detected. RexxS was kind enough to lend a hand and it's all fixed now. :) TheDragonFire (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

...oops. Sorry for any disruption it caused. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:45, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!

Hello Anarchyte: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you. Have a great holiday too! Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays

From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol

Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.

So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 03:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Cheers MarnetteD! Have a great holiday too! Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello Anarchyte: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

Muboshgu

Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned

None

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey results have been posted. The Community Tech team will investigate and address the top ten results.
The Anti-Harassment Tools team is inviting comments on new blocking tools and improvements to existing blocking tools for development in early 2018. Feedback can be left on the discussion page or by email.

Arbitration

Following the results of the 2017 election, the following editors have been (re)appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Alex Shih, BU Rob13, Callanecc, KrakatoaKatie, Opabinia regalis, Premeditated Chaos, RickinBaltimore, Worm That Turned.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Tooth and Tail

Good day! Have you completed a Tooth and Tail article, and do you have any big plans regarding it? I'm planning to translate this article to russian later this month. Cheers! --Lone Guardian (talk) 02:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Lone Guardian. The bulk of it is done. Just waiting on a few replies from the devs (for clarity: making sure everything's correct and that I haven't missed anything vital) and a WP:GOCE copyedit. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Info about copyvio problems at Vanessa Marie?

Besides what happened here, not to my knowledge. It got G12'd but because there was a version without copyright issues, I reverted to that and revdel'd the issue instead. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for yout !vote at TAFI. If you find time for it please review my other nominations as well. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

About the for honor edit I did.

Would like me to put that under development insted. Danny231 (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Danny231. If you're planning on adding information about post-release updates, it should go in an article's Development or Post-release section (if it has one). In your case, I'd recommend adding a sentence to development with a reliable source to back it up. You can find a list of many video-game related reliable sources here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

So what do you mean by finding a source sorry I’m kind of new with the editing etc. Danny231 (talk) 05:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Danny231: All good! Basically, everything on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable and sourced. If you wanted to add something to an article that said "Season two of For Honor was [...]" you'd need a source for it. This, for example, would be a good one. Take a look at WP:REFB, if you're interested in how referencing works. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

So if I re-add what I type in development would I have to put that reference in the reference part of the article? Is that what you are saying. Danny231 (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Danny231: Sort of. It's a little bit more complicated than that. This page describes how to reference using in-line citations. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Is there some easy I could star with, so I can used to it? Before doing something difficult. Thanks. Danny231 (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Start* Danny231 (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Danny231: To open use the reference generator, all you've gotta do is this: Click "cite" (far right), choose "cite web", enter all the fields, and click "insert". Make sure your cursor is at the end of the sentence you wish to add the reference to. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay thanks for the help :). Danny231 (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

I added some into the Elder scrolls online talk page.

But what I posted never showed up. And it was to do with Clockwork City. Danny231 (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Danny231: Odd. Are you sure you clicked "save" or just "preview"? Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

I don’t what happened Danny231 (talk) 07:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

But I found a link that would help but it’s not letting me share it. Danny231 (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Is it giving you a warning, Danny231? Is it saying it's blacklisted? Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

It’s from the IGN website. Danny231 (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Is that why it may be, blacklisted? Danny231 (talk) 10:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Danny231: No, IGN isn't blacklisted. Try asking here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

We’re would you like me to add it onto the ESO Wikipedia page :) or would like like me try it in the talk section again? Danny231 (talk) 13:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@Danny231: I'm not sure what you want to add, so just add it yourself. If people disagree, they can always undo your edit and then you can discuss it on the talk. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay will do thanks so much for the help these past few days! Danny231 (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Tooth and Tail

Hello, Anarchyte. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Tooth and Tail at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Monaco FA nom

I'm not sure I should participate as I'm very unfamiliar with the process. After one or two noms or more work at PR maybe… but we'll see if comments get going on Monaco and I feel like jumping in. If anything, it will be fun to watch its development and see what I missed! Rhinopias (talk) 22:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

That's fine, Rhinopias. Thanks for the help in the PR

Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Reply

You are correct about the talk page since I do that too. You might want to tell that to the other admins who were reverting it. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 11:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokemon Go screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pokemon Go screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Erlan Azahra

User:Erlan Azahra ,Hello,Why you deleted my posted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nusantara_Turbin_Dan_Propulsi, can you tell me which parts are wrong from my article? please. Erlan Azahra (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Erlan Azahra. The page was quite promotional in tone and didn't abide by Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view policies. Even though it was in draft-space, we do not allow pages that verge on being advertisements. If you're interested in working on the article in the future, might I suggest using WP:AFC to get the opinions of experienced editors before publishing? I also suggest looking at WP:GNG and WP:V. Hope this helps, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Amy Adams

Hi there, I'm wondering on what basis Amy Adams was semi-protected. Thanks, 142.161.81.20 (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Some of your (and other IPs') edits were disrupting the article: tagging live URLs as dead ([1] (SS)), continuously adding incorrect tags (where are the quotes that aren't needed? Tags at the top of pages should be for serious issues that wouldn't be able to be fixed by just tagging one section), and adding unnecessary verbiage (though this is pretty much a non-issue). WP:BRD states that if you add something boldly and it gets reverted/undone, you should then discuss it, not continue to re-add it (ambiguity could have been avoided by leaving an edit summary on the first edit, rather than explaining after being reverted). Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Under which provision of WP:SEMI does that fall? The only provisions that could come close to applying are:

"Subject to edit-warring where all parties involved are unregistered or new editors (i.e. in cases in which full protection would otherwise be applied). This does not apply when autoconfirmed users are involved." – Not all involved are unautoconfirmed.
"Subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to media attention) when blocking individual users is not a feasible option." – I don't see why blocking individual users is not an option given that I am one of two unregistered users to edit the article in the past month.

WP:BRD states that if you add something boldly and it gets reverted/undone, you should then discuss it, not continue to re-add it (ambiguity could have been avoided by leaving an edit summary on the first edit, rather than explaining after being reverted). I'm not sure what I could have discussed (or could discuss) given that I still haven't the faintest idea why the edit was reverted. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

An article can be semi protected if PC isn't successfully preventing what could be considered disruptive editing. Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate, even if they meet the aforementioned criteria. Instead semi-protection should be considered. Bursts of editing can take the article from being PC-able to semi-able because of the now-high edit rate.

I'm not sure what I could have discussed (or could discuss) given that I still haven't the faintest idea why the edit was reverted. That's why BRD exists. If you don't understand why you were reverted, ask the user who reverted you (the D is discuss).

I'll ping a few other admins that regular RFPP, and if they consider it to be unnecessary, I'll remove the semi. @Samsara, Courcelles, and SoWhy:. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

How is six edits in five days a "high edit rate"? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 07:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Having had another look and with the requesting user actually redoing some of the edits they undid of yours, I've restored Amy Adams back to PC until Dec 23, 2018. Please note, however, that the link isn't dead and the tag at the top of the page has been disputed, so it should either be discussed on the talk, or placed in a more specific area where the issue is obvious. Have a great day, Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

(pinged) Have to agree with 142... here, the amount of editing after PC was set seems to be low enough for people to handle, especially considering that the page has 350+ watchers. Regards So Why 08:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

All Ok Babu.

Hi i have submitted my article for review and review is pending for long time.Could you please review it and do the needful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alok_R_Babu

Thanks and kind regards... Kirapz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiranpz (talk • contribs) 04:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Thank You
		Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

BestVPN listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BestVPN. Since you had some involvement with the BestVPN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ringbang (talk) 21:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Blurpeace • Dana boomer • Deltabeignet • Denelson83 • Grandiose • Salvidrim! • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee has enacted a change to the discretionary sanctions procedure which requires administrators to add a standardized editnotice when placing page restrictions. Editors cannot be sanctioned for violations of page restrictions if this editnotice was not in place at the time of the violation.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Xbox onne listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xbox onne. Since you had some involvement with the Xbox onne redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Draft:Elly Gold

Hello Anarchyte. I am just letting you know that I deleted Draft:Elly Gold, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Ged UK 10:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ged UK: Thanks for letting me know, but I disagree. A7 is for articles only, and the page you deleted was a draft, meaning it didn't apply. It was a draft that hadn't been edited for six months (May 2017), meaning G13 applied. It was also written proportionally in my opinion given the use of words like "phenominal" [sic] and "amazing". Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

I didn't actually mean to tag you. You're right. I wouldn't worry too much about it, the page has gone :) Ged UK 11:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

All good. I've never seen that tag before so I was a tad puzzled. Have a fantastic day/night, Ged UK

. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

It's a tag off a CSD script I use. I can't remember the exact article (I'm ploughing through the backlog!), but it's probably because I thought it would be better as a A7, forgetting that it was a draft! I find A7 is a 'stronger' CSD category as the spam one is a bit more open to interpretation. But like you said, it was a draft! Ged UK 11:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Anarchyte. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
Message added 07:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cyrfaw (talk) 07:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tooth and Tail

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tooth and Tail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 05:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tooth and Tail

The article Tooth and Tail you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tooth and Tail for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tooth and Tail

The article Tooth and Tail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tooth and Tail for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Controversial move by a page mover

Hello, Anarchyte.

Could you review this page move done while a discussion was ongoing? It was recommended to them that an admin should handle it yet they ignored it and went ahead with their own judgement to controversially 'undo' a move. This is by an editor whom you've granted the page mover rights. — Za wl 10:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Anarchyte, I believe giving you "1" diff is not fair and paints skewed picture of the situation. So you can read the entire discussion for context (Permalink). Also pinging @Primefac: per this. Because the nature of the move and title/article grabbing is germane to that discussion. –Ammarpad (talk) 11:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Zawl and Ammarpad. I think the page title should have been left as it was (with the song by The Chainsmokers being created separately) and then moved as a result of a discussion because the Nas song had a longstanding title and because moving it immediately might break internal and external links. Ammarpad did not act inappropriately here because they were revering a bold move (WP:BRD) but with that said, it probably wasn't the best idea to do it while a discussion was taking place. Just to clarify, Zawl used no suppression when moving the page to the new title. Also, Ss112 referred to some relevant pages, specifically WP:CRYSTAL and WP:RECENTISM, and as this is obviously a contentious move, I suggest a discussion be created on Talk:You Owe Me (The Chainsmokers song). Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, thanks Anarchyte. It is over from me and the discussion has been started. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

I know I'm a bit late to the party but I pretty much agree with the above - first move was contested, a discussion was made, and it's a contested technical move so the RM process needs to be started. Primefac (talk) 17:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC) (please ping on reply)

DYK nomination of Tooth and Tail

Hello! Your submission of Tooth and Tail at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tempo Storm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearthstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

Lourdes†

AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V

† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Following the 2018 Steward elections, the following users are our new stewards: -revi, Green Giant, Rxy, There'sNoTime, علاء.

Obituaries

Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine

Hello, Anarchyte. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TunnelBear Connected USA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TunnelBear Connected USA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Daylen (talk) 03:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hearthstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Card deck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tooth and Tail

Hello! Your submission of Tooth and Tail at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Naliboki massacre

I don't quite get why you accepted K.e.coffman's request to ECP Naliboki massacre instead of semi-protecting it. The EE arbcom decision does not allow for mandatory ECP in that topic area so we need to try semi-protection first. If you want to semi-protect for a length of time because of disruption then that's a normal admin action. If you want it to become an arbcom enforcement action then you need to log it at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2018 (create a new section for Eastern Europe). I would probably do a three month semi-protection against sockpuppetry (I blocked the person using that range a couple days ago but they keep hopping) as a normal admin action to start with. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:48, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

@NeilN: Thanks for the message. I'll try out semi for now, if that's what you think is necessary. Anarchyte (work | talk) 22:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks. The policy is at WP:ECP if you're interested. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG

Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando

Guideline and policy news

Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous

A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Tooth and Tail

On 3 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tooth and Tail, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tooth and Tail's art style was described as a modernized version of 1990s pixel art? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tooth and Tail. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tooth and Tail), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Why

Hello! I ask you explain me: why situation on this page is vandalism? Main website of the Russian government says lie? Official partner of UNESCO (RIA) says lie? Or ..? Sorry for grammatical mistakes. - 95.29.152.219 (talk) 13:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC).

It's factually inaccurate and your edit warring became disruptive. If you look at the edit history, the information was removed with a link here. This PDF reads:

A noteworthy incident occurred on January 15. On social media and the internet in the Spanish-speaking world, rumors were wildly circulating that it was the International Day of the Beatles, and that this Day had been officially launched by UNESCO. #DiaMundialDeTheBeatles was even a trending topic on Twitter in Mexico and Guatemala. UNESCO’s social media team took Twitter to set the record straight, with good humor. Tweet-by-tweet coverage of UNESCO’s clarifications was provided in several leading Latin American media

Continuing to this info fell under a combination of vandalism and disruptive editing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Correction: "main newspaper of the Russian government". I know about info from Twitter. This info has the same nature like the List of UNESCO does not contain this holiday (Paul and Ringo are living people and UNESCO can not say about holiday personally, if only research statistics on this issue). UNESCO uses its partners to say about holiday. Example of known holiday with living man: Nelson Mandela day was "rumors" till 2013 (real date is 2009). I think you understand this. Beatles day is reality! - 95.29.132.215 (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC).

Andy Schatz

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Andy Schatz has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GA process.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, from the Portals WikiProject...

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted 9 days ago, and is going strong. Fifty-two editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

We are working on creating tools to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished one so far, with more to come.

Discussions are underway about how to upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too) on the WikiProject page.

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 02:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news

The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee is seeking additional clerks to help with the arbitration process.

Obituaries

Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

User:SunMouse

SunMouse (talk · contribs) This account has also been vandalizing Clyde Lewis. Thanks. 176.205.8.108 (talk) 04:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Recreating Free Lives

I was so disappointed Free Lives was deleted per consensus, that I decided to recreate it as a draft. I believe the draft I created is suitable to be moved to the mainspace. However, seeing as this article was deleted per AfD consensus yesterday, I figured it would be proper to run it past the deleting admin rather than boldly moving it. Do you believe the subject fails WP:GNG after seeing this draft? ~Mable (chat) 13:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

@Maplestrip: It's looking a lot better and I'd be willing to say it meets WP:NCORP now. However, I'm not too familiar with the procedures surrounding having an article deleted at AfD and then remade only a few days later (obviously G4 doesn't apply). @Ritchie333: Would you happen to know what to do in these sort of situations? Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Seems like this conversation has fallen still. ~Mable (chat) 08:10, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Maplestrip: Yeah, seems Ritchie is away for the time being. @SoWhy: Would you be able to tell us what to do in these situations? Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Interestingly enough, Wikipedia has, afaik, no established policy or guideline (Wikipedia:Recreation of previously deleted pages is an essay and a failed proposal). Per WP:DRVPURPOSE, DRV can be used to request recreation of a deleted article when significant new information has come to light. Considering that you offered sources already and they were rejected, this is not necessarily true but imho the spirit still fits (personally, I probably would have relisted the AFD to allow discussion of those sources but that's irrelevant). Realistically, if you just recreate the article without going through DRV and G4 does not fit, the worst that can happen is another AFD. Regards So Why 09:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, if this seems like an intrusion but I admire Sandstein's workflow in these cases.Ping all the AfD participants for their views on the new version and if a majority agrees that they need to reconsider their stand from that in the original AfD, that's a green-flag to re-create the article.And, at any case, a deleted article, which does not meet G4 can be recreated anytime....... ~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Winged Blades of Godric: Not at all! I think that might be a bit overkill in this situation, so I suggest Maplestrip just remake the article as suggested by SoWhy. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks you all very much! I have recreated the article and it is on my watchlist. I very much appreciate the responses ^_^ ~Mable (chat) 13:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Could you possibly restore the page's history for attribution? Lordtobi (✉) 13:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

I see no reason not to (and I've seen it done before), so I've restored it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Fallout 4: Far Harbor. Chetsford (talk) 01:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Chetsford! Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 23:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Al Ameer son • AliveFreeHappy • Cenarium • Lupo • MichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

Following a successful request for comment, administrators are now able to add and remove editors to the "event coordinator" group. Users in the event coordinator group have the ability to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit. Users will no longer need to be in the "account creator" group if they are in the event coordinator group.
Following an AN discussion, all pages with content related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are now under indefinite general sanctions.

Technical news

IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous

In early May, an unusually high level of failed login attempts was observed. The WMF has stated that this was an "external effort to gain unauthorized access to random accounts". Under Wikipedia policy, administrators are required to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Vivek chourasia

hello anarchyte myself vivek chourasia i know it my mistake that i violate the wikipedia rules and regulations and im sorry about my misdeed. and i assure you it won't happen again. please unblock my page and let me allow to create and article with vivek chourasia and i will follow every rules for the creation of the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:641C:EEE6:AC6A:1F20:711F:9939 (talk) 10:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Note to Anarchyte: Also on my user talk. —DoRD (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, the articles that have been deleted look like they're autobiographies. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not Facebook or a site along those lines. Take a look at WP:NBIO to see what we look for in a biography. At the moment I don't see any good reasons to undelete or unprotect the page. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Request for deletion

I just need to request you that please delete three pages - User talk:Ram The Editor, User talk:Misser Boss and User talk:Yisrael Kristal as the reason of criteria G6. We don't need those pages any more. Thank you. 122.161.224.89 (talk) 09:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Those pages have been protected by other admins to prevent deletion tags. You'll have to talk to them directly. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

The deleted page of Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation

Hi there, as the deleted page of Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation I created was very promotional, and I am curious about whether there are some sentences or paragraphs promotional, and please help me point them out.

If you think the page was not compliance with the regulations, can you provide me with some exemplary articles for reference?

And I don't think that is the problem of the whole article, what should I do next? Drafting a new article or revising the previous one?

Looking forward to your early reply! Thank you! Constance wu (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Constance wu. The entire article read like a sort of advertisement. Additionally, it failed to give any evidence of notability. There's not much worth salvaging, so I'd suggest starting anew. Might I also suggest having a look at WP:AFC? It will allow you to gather the opinions of experienced editors before the article goes live. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

The new created page of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)

Hi Anarchyte. I have created a new article of CAPSE (Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation) [[2]] in my sandbox and published it. Please help me to check whether the new one is in compliance with the policy of wikipedia or not. If there are any problems, please help me point out, and I will revise it. Anyway, if you think that the article is qualified, what should I do next? Thank you!

Constance wu (talk) 05:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Constance wu: It's still promotional. Have a read of already existing articles on similar topics to see how they are written. I've also added an AfC tag to it so that you can submit it for review when you think it is done. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

The new created page of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)

Hi Anarchyte. I really don't understand why my new page of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)[[3]] is still promotional as you said. Because I translated it according to the article in Baidu baike https://baike.baidu.com/item/CAPSE/22662918?fr=aladdin , and I didn't add any other contents and just described the whole facts about CAPSE. Also,I have read of already existing articles on similar topics to see how they are written, like Skytrax[[4]], VariFlight[[5]]. Even I have already revised my page again. So I am confused now which sentences or words are not qualified exactly, please help me point out and tell me how to revise the article. Thank you.

Constance wu (talk) 07:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Constance wu: That encyclopedia has different guidelines to Wikipedia. Just because that website accepts the information doesn't mean we do. Additionally, do you know if the site releases the content under a copyright-free license? If not, we're going to need to delete the sandbox. Either way, please reword the content so that it's in your own words. At the moment, the article is written in broken English and the content in the "products and services" section is still promotional. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

The new created page of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)

Hi Anarchyte. Thank you for your reply. I should explain first that the new page I created is absolutely released under a copyright-free license, both the CAPSE logo and contents. I uploaded the logo on Wikipedia Commons before, and added some usage restrictions in case anyone else will use it freely. Because of my mistake, now I became the one who use the logo without the copyright-free license. So I don't think that you need to delete the sandbox, and I will upload the logo to English Wikipedia (not Wikimedia Commons) again. As for the article, I will revise it later and still hope that you will give a help for my request. Thanks!

Constance wu (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rust (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DayZ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor

Gogo Dodo

Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes

Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news

An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

The revised page of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)

Hi Anarchyte. I'm sorry for disturbing you again. I have revised my draft of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)[[6]],and I am not sure about whether the new one is qualified to be published. Could you do me a favor to have a check? If there are any problems, please let me know. Thank you for your attention.

Constance wu (talk) 08:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Constance wu: I don't have the time right now to look over it and translate the sources. Click the submit button and another experienced editor will be able to leave comments. From a quick glance, I noticed you've cut down the promotional tone, which is good. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

The revised page of CAPSE(Civil Aviation Service Passenger Evaluation)

Hi Anarchyte. Thank you for your early reply. It's very kind of you! I appreciate your help and your patience. And I will submit it right now. Thanks again.

Constance wu (talk) 09:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fool in the Rain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cavanaugh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Happy Adminship

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, Kpgj hpjm 02:32, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Zep stuff

After you mentioned you were working on Fool in the Rain I looked through a bunch of Led Zeppelin articles, grimaced at the quality (and rather too much fan's point of view on them) and started cleaning them up. As a result, I've (possibly temporarily) re-activated Wikipedia:WikiProject Led Zeppelin just to keep track of any good content. I wouldn't have done this had the project not existed as a "dead" state - I'd have just put it on a userpage - but it's there so I might as well make use of it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: Fantastic! I've added my name to the list of participants. Do you reckon posting something on WT:WPMU would help the WikiProject grow? As for Fool in the Rain, I'm waiting on a response from the Wikipedia Library for Newspaper.com access before I begin the overview section. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Apparently we can give out goats now? Anyway, I saw you at the Commons AN mess, followed all of your links, and was reminded why I always like you and was sad we hadn't crossed paths on here of late. Anyway, just saying hi :)

TonyBallioni (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Nice of you to drop by! I haven't been as active as of late due being caught up in real life, but I hope I can contribute more often soon. And yeah, that Commons thread really is a mess, it's as though no one wants to receive any criticism (even if they're not the one with the desysop request). Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Endless waiting for review of Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation

Hi Anarchyte. I'm sorry for disturbing you again. My draft of Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation[[7]] has been waiting for review more than two weeks, I saw the volume of submissions for review is always increasing, and there is still no change for my draft. So, I am afraid of endless waiting.

Do you know any AfC reviewers who can review Chinese references? Or, are there any ways to make it reviewed as soon as possible?

By the way, if there is nothing I can do just wait, how long does it take at most？

Looking forward to your early reply. Thank you!

Constance wu (talk) 03:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@Constance wu: Unfortunately, the AfC process is quite backlogged, so you could be waiting up to a month or so. I don't know of any Chinese editors, but you could ask for help at WP:TEAHOUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

An apology (I'm not sure if I added this correctly, sorry)

Hi Anarchyte, I'd like to offer up my sincerest apologies. I came back from summer camp a couple days ago. I guess I was missing being at camp because I, along with a couple other friends, found my camp's page on Wikipedia and started to edit in a bunch of inside jokes into the page. At the time, I didn't fully realize that what I was doing was wrong, but I realize it now, and I'm very, very sorry. Wikipedia is a great site with a great mission, and by vandalizing one of its pages, I put Wikipedia's integrity at risk. I also wasted your time and caused the page to be shut down for a couple days, leaving it locked to other people who might have legitimate edits they want to add. Again, I'm very sorry for intentionally spreading false information on Wikipedia. I hope you can forgive me. ~~~~

Hey, thanks for apologising, I appreciate it. I'm going to unprotect the article now as it seems you've learned your lesson. You were never blocked, but that might not be the case in the future, so try to prevent the urge next time, and instead try editing constructively and helping out the site. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Rust (video game)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Rust (video game) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding the VanossGaming Page Protections

I agree. It was necessary, especially when considered how often people messed with the page.

Just one thing to note: one of the quotes is still incorrect, where a small list of games he plays started out as a quote, but then was frequently edited to include games anachronistic and simply not in the original quote. Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto were in the original quote. Fortnite, Garry’s Mod, and Uno were not.

This annoyed me so much, especially when one considers proper quoting is part of middle school cirriculum.

If this one edit could me made to fix the quote, then reinstate protection, I personally would at least feel better.

Sorry. New to the whole Wikipedia editing side. Also on mobile. And tired. Sheesh. MDGLee (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

@MDGLee: Hi, thanks for letting me know. I've removed those three games from the quote. One more thing, semi protection only prevents really new users from editing. If you're able to get to ten article edits, you'll be able to edit semi protected pages. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

question/problem

Dear Anarchyte, I have created a draft for Islamic revolution and holy defence museum, the largest museum of Iran and one of the largests in Asia. this museum has a page in Persian, but the problem is lack of English sources for this very prominent museum. in my draft I have used 4 different sources and there is no more. would you please help me how can I solve this problem? thank you Sepehr e (talk) 05:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Persian page: https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%BA_%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%87_%D8%AF%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B9_%D9%85%D9%82%D8%AF%D8%B3_(%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86)

English draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Islamic_revolution_and_holy_defence_musuem

Hi Sepehr e. While this is the English Wikipedia, sources don't need to be in English. Feel free to add reliable sources in other languages. However, make sure the currently existing English source are reliable. Lonely Planet has an "edit" button so it might be unusable as it's user-generated. "toursiniran" also looks like it's not the most reliable. I did a bit of digging and found a few English sources for you: [8] [9] [10]. Hope these help. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

File:RockPaperShotgunWebsite.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

May you help me?

My created page Lavi Hoss got a proposed deletion proposal. If I remove this will I got blocked or any warning like that? Or, is it possible to remove by you? regards. Sbshuvo (talk) 03:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@Sbshuvo: You won't get in trouble for removing a PROD from your own article (you can't remove CSD or AFD tags, though). As I said on SoWhy's talk page, if you think the article is fine, remove the tag yourself. However, be aware of the fact that it may be taken to AfD afterwards where other people will be able to leave comments. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:01, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Hebrew Bible

Thanks for closing the discussion and moving the page. In regards to the (very minor) question as to where to park the talk page of the old article, the former Hebrew Bible article was mostly about terminology, so perhaps Talk:Hebrew Bible (term) would be the most suitable. St Anselm (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

No, it's pointless to define the "Hebrew Bible" in a new article as a term when the article Hebrew Bible already explains that. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@JudeccaXIII: I believe StAnselm is referring to moving Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) (which only exists to keep the history) to Hebrew Bible (term). Hebrew Bible is staying put. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@StAnselm: I'm going to move it to (term). Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Danish overseas colonies

When you moved this page, the talk page was not moved. TompaDompa (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Odd. I've moved it now. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Re:Monaco

Hey! Great to see that so much work has been done on this article—it's an interesting one. That said, I'm unfortunately not as much of a reviewer as I used to be. I can give the article a quick source/citation-quality review, though, if that will help. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@JimmyBlackwing: Sure! I believe FA noms require an analysis of the sources before it can pass, so I'll ping you when I create the nomination if that's okay with you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

OTD July 27

Re: this edit, neither Battle of Bouvines nor Korean Armistice Agreement have maintenance tags that would disqualify them from appearing. The rule is the article may not have yellow-level or higher tags on it, so I don't understand why you pulled them out. A few CN tags (relative to article length) are permissible, and the armistice one doesn't even have a single one. The State Department one was my bad; I tagged the article myself and I forgot to take it out. So I'm going to put those two back in. Regards, —howcheng {chat} 16:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@Howcheng: I pulled the armistice one because of Korean Demilitarized Zone, which has an orange-level maintenance tag on it. As for Battle of Bouvines, almost the whole of aftermath is lacking sourcing, so it's basically got an orange-level refimprove section on it with all those {{cns}}. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

We only care about the quality of the bold (featured) article, so the fact that the DMZ article is tagged is of no consequence. As for the battle, I'm the one who added the CNs, so I did consider if that was worth a refimprove on that section, and I decided against it. —howcheng {chat} 08:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

@Howcheng: But it is bold? An armistice was signed (pictured) to end hostilities in the Korean War, officially making the division of Korea indefinite by creating an approximately 4 km (2.5 mi) wide demilitarized zone across the Korean Peninsula. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh, how did I miss that? OK, well the easy solution is to remove the bold from it. Sorry about that! —howcheng {chat} 15:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Move protection

Hi there. Can you protect my talk page from moves also; it was hit in this last go-round. Home Lander (talk) 02:18, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Revoke user tp

Hi Anarchyte, I think Debtrena needs a break from editing their user talk page - see their edit summaries. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 21:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@Bonadea: Thanks for letting me know. I've revoked their access. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Hoary's block on one of my IP's

Anarchyte, I think what happened was that I had reverted this edit made by a WP:GOODHAND sock on Hoary's talkpage. Since User:Lamesiam was obviously a good-hand User:Nsmutte sock (see also Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nsmutte), Hoary perceived my revert on their talkpage as unconstructive since the sock account's edit to their talkpage seemed constructive. Also note that my IPv6 address changes every 10 or so minutes with my terrible wi-fi connection, so I'm not intentionally changing my IP address to evade blocks. :-) 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:C9F7:7C9C:ECAB:5A0 (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Also, Hoary just responded on their talkpage and unblocked the IP address. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:C9F7:7C9C:ECAB:5A0 (talk) 05:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

I thought something like that must've happened. Good to have it cleared up now

Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Anarchyte, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your comments at my page mover request

Hello, and thanks for your quick response. First of all, apologises for seeming like a hat collector, as this is not my intention. I came to ask if in a move discussion: Is 4 for move and 2 for not move enough for consensus? Your help will be appreciated. Thanks. The Duke of Nonsense^{What is necessary for thee?}. 07:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

@The Duke of Nonsense: There needs to be more context than "4 support, 2 oppose". Consensus isn't a strawpoll, it's an analysis of the utilisation of our policies and guidelines. If four people say "yeah sure let's move it" and the two say "no, and here are reasons why", then there it shouldn't be closed as move. Same the other way. If four people are in support with accurate rationales and there are two people with nothing, then I'd be more inclined to move it than to relist or close as anything else. If all six have good reasoning, it's certainly on its way to being closed as move, but I'd relist in an attempt to make it clearer. Decision-making involves an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Is there a specific request that this is referring to, or is it a hypothetical?

In the discussion I mentioned in my declining of your request, you closed it a day early, at at the time, all of the !votes had some sort of rationale, besides one supporter. Additionally, both sides were still refuting one another, which is usually a sign that a consensus hasn't formed yet. A head count shows 9 supports to 7 opposes. WP:BADNAC says these sorts of discussions shouldn't be closed by non-admins anyway. The outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial. Such closes are better left to an administrator.

If you're able to spend a month or so working at WP:RM, closing non-controversial moves and showing a need for the page mover permission, I'll gladly reconsider. At the moment, you don't have enough experience in the area for me to feel right granting it. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Steel Division 2

On 5 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Steel Division 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the announcement of Steel Division 2 came after half the team at Eugen Systems, the video game's developers, went on strike? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Steel Division 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Steel Division 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

Sro23

KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news

The WMF Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input on the second set of wireframes for the Special:Block redesign that will introduce partial blocks. The new functionality will allow you to block a user from editing a specific set of pages, pages in a category, a namespace, and for specific actions such as moving pages and uploading files.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Prep 3

Hi, I just noticed the promotions you made to Prep 3, thanks. A heads-up: We try to alternate bio/non-bio hooks. We also don't promote two hooks by the same nominator, or two of the same kind of hooks. I moved the nature image to a later prep set. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi again. I'm just wondering why you didn't copy the entire DYK credit line, including the subpage, for each hook that you promoted. I restored the whole credit lines here. Best, Yoninah (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Hi, I thought I did copy all the credits. I forgot to give Cwmhiraeth a credit line for each of the four articles, but did I miss anyone else? I'll keep your advice in mind. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you did include the DYKmake credit, but for some reason didn't copy the "subpage" part at the end. The whole line, including the squiggly brackets on each side, should be copied. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 11:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your helping maintain the integrity of the Main Page!

		The Outlaw Halo Award
		In the last 17 days alone, we've identified and fixed more than 100 errors at the ALL NEW TRM ERRORS page!! Thanks so much for your diligence and your dedication to ensuring our readers get the best possible experience from Wikipedia! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: No problem, and thank you for finding the errors! It's nice to know that we're keeping the most viewed page of the fifth most viewed website clean

. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andy Schatz

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andy Schatz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andy Schatz

The article Andy Schatz you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andy Schatz for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 16:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rust (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rust (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SoWhy -- SoWhy (talk) 09:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

How am I doing, and should I request for page mover now?

Hello. Nearly a month ago, I requested the page mover permission. And you declined it. Citing that I should work at WP:RM for a "month or so", before reapplying. Since then, I have closed countless requests at WP:RM, and have also made countless successful requests at WP:RMT. So, I was wondering if I should reapply for the right. Thank you, and apologies if I am seen as a hat collector, as this is not my intention. The Duke of Nonsense^{What is necessary for thee?} 11:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi The Duke of Nonsense. I'll take a look at it sometime tonight. I've been a bit busy recently. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi again. I've had another look over your logs, and for the most part, I think you're ready so I'm going to grant you the right. I have one concern, though. This one would have benefited from being relisted, especially when the previous one ended as no consensus. I don't think it's right to close a new one with only one comment, even if it might look like WP:SILENCE. Besides that, all of your moves have been uncontroversial. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:29, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

I cannot thank you enough for giving me the permission. One more question though, how was my maturity during this situation? I am talking about when I was talking to you both a month ago and now. Your comments in order to improve my conduct will be greatly appreciated. Again, thank you. The Duke of Nonsense^{What is necessary for thee?} 18:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@The Duke of Nonsense: Nothing really stood out, but I thought it was good of you to ask for additional help. It showed a willingness to learn, which is appreciated. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK inaccuracies (Friends album)

With all due respect, the original text before this edit was NOT inaccurate. Brian Wilson was certainly the leader and principal songwriter of the Beach Boys. There's a big quote box under "Background" that explains this.

... it is here that the "Brian-is-the-Beach-Boys" era comes to a close. ... After Wild Honey, the Beach Boys were no longer Brian's creative vehicle, in spite of what the band might have preferred that their fans, the press, or their successive record companies, to believe.

I realize that this means, technically, that he was not the "leader" in 1968, but that's a matter of splitting hairs -- in the first place, he was never the official bandleader, moreso a "de facto leader", but he's still commonly referred to as the group's main creative force, or at worst, the band's "erstwhile leader" after 1968. And the second paragraph under "Legacy" explains that Friends was the last album that he was involved with before mental illness took him away from most of the group's subsequent recordings.

I'm really surprised that this hook rewrite was done without consulting another editor, especially since it makes it much more uninteresting. If this can't be cleared up ASAP then I'm requesting that the hook be withdrawn so that another one can be written. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ilovetopaint: The issue was brought up at The Rambling Man's error page, so it was seen by multiple people before being changed. If you want to call him the bandleader, have a source that calls him that. Otherwise we're stuck with something on the main page that only vaguely mentioned in the article (which is contradictory to the purpose of DYK). Reduce is different to cease. You can start reducing your involvement with albums before ceasing, but you can't say that you began reducing after having already reduced your involvement. Hence, saying "one of" is undeniably the correct terminology. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Which is why the original text said "last to involve ...", not "first to reduce his involvement". "The last" is more notable than "one of the last". And Brian Wilson being the Beach Boys' leader is not hard to cite. If hairs must be split, then other alternatives could have been "former leader", "longtime leader", "principal songwriter" ...--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

I realize now that it was actually @Cwmhiraeth: who messed with the wording.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

I promoted this hook. The approved hook was

... that the Beach Boys' TM-inspired Friends (1968) was their last album to involve bandleader Brian Wilson before his descent into addiction and mental illness?

but that has BLP issues, brings in facts not included in the article and was never going to be acceptable on the main page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

People need to stop making words and phrases up that don't appear in the target article. People also need to spend more time checking the veracity of hooks rather than just tinkering with them and destroying them. All of these things should be addressed before articles are promoted to a prep set, not when they're in a queue or on the main page. Inexcusable. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz

Optimist on the run → Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux

Guideline and policy news

Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rust (video game)

The article Rust (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rust (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SoWhy -- SoWhy (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Zep stuff

Hi, I seem to recall you were improving a few Led Zeppelin articles. I've done work on all of the studio albums up to Presence but I left the last two as I think you were going to look at them. What's up? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ritchie333. I've been quite busy recently, so I haven't had that many opportunities to work on any articles. In regards to Fool in the Rain, I added a brief reception section which I plan to work on sometime in the future, but I'm not sure where to start with the overview. Feel free to work on it if you want. I'll try to drop by and help out. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)