User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Danke

Thanks for cleaning this mess up. I opened a discussion on the talk page about the vapor projects. The Owings Mills, Maryland IP who keeps submitting Mighty Mouse and misspelling "adaptation" as "adoption" is clearly a vandal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

EVINE Live Wikipedia page

Hi, I'm writing on behalf of EVINE Live and I've noticed you have been making updates to the EVINE Live Wikipedia page. We are concerned with how you're referring to our company - specifically the main page. It lists us as "EVine Live" when we are "EVINE Live". I know it's a minor change, but it matters a lot in securing and maintaining the identity of our new brand (which was made official as of 2/11/15). To show proof of this, please visit this link: [1]

Thank you.

Totisevine (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

References

Continuing to post things inaccurately

Removing my alleged bias, if you look at all recent news announcements, it states us as EVINE Live, not EVine Live.

Totisevine (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for your vigilance in sniffing out the IP socks of Hypocritepedia. Your efforts are much appreciated. MarnetteD|Talk 05:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

FYI

Hello again. I wanted to let you know that Hypocritepedia is back as 69.178.194.106‎ (talk · contribs). I filed an AIV but I don't know if they will ask for a SPI as well. I just wanted to keep you up to date on this. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 04:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Update: Looks like a range block has been applied so we may get a week or so of rest.MarnetteD|Talk 05:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Is it possible to get a better version of the LLS logo, ie one where the letters don't extend beyond the background? The current one is difficult to read. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.194.16.123 (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

The Cube

What do you think of Wikipedia having hundreds or thousands of articles about individual TV episodes? If that is the case, how about The Cube? It just doesn't make sense to not have 1 article about a pilot yet have many TV episode articles. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I am not arguing with you. I am merely perplexed!

The Storyteller (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine)

Burn Out (CSI)

What They Become — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowee Zowee public (talkcontribs) 17:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to weigh in

I invite you to give your two cents on an AfD discussion – Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sugar Pop Show. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

TheREALCableGuy had nothing to do with removing PTC content from Our Idiot Brian. Now stop accusing him of making that edit. He's no longer on this site. 66.87.133.233 (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Live Well Network status update

Thanks for the status update of LWN and WBAY-DT3. ABC has been pretty bad on when they finally will put this network to rest. Msw1002 (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

[1] Logo's background transparency

Hello Mrschrimpf, Thank you for uploading Olympiacos logo with background transparency, but you made the whole background transparent, even the middle. It should be transparent only in its edges like these logos: [2], [3], [4]. If it isn't such a great deal for you, I would be grateful if you uploaded a new version of the file. Thank you so much for your help and your attention, Gtrbolivar (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

It's OK man, I managed to pull it off by myself. Thanks anyway. Gtrbolivar (talk) 01:53, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to the noticeboard

You are invited to noticeboard here about vandalism on 2014–15 United States network television schedule about IP users adding Marlton School on that article, along with other TV show related articles. BattleshipMan (talk) 05:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Declining America This Morning

WSB is not the only ABC to decline America This Morning, but WJCL in Savannah and WBND in South Bend as well. --24.175.181.151 (talk) 02:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Biased Mizzou Arena page guarded by bullies

You are welcome to you libelous Mizzou Arena page. I took back all the other work I did on it. I do not give anyone permission to my work on it. If you want it to be up to date, do the work yourself. DO NOT use any of the previous edits I contributed. Eodcarl (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

you're right, I'll leave it to you fascists who run this self-licking ice cream cone. Stay off my talk page. Eodcarl (talk) 03:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I just wanted to drop you a note about some of your comments. I don't have an issue with MaranoFan, per se. I've actually defended him in the past against other editors. But, as you can tell from his signature, he is clearly a fan of Meghan Trainor, and I believe that he has (perhaps unknowingly) engaged with WP:FANCRUFT and been editing and nominating articles which are clearly forked content. MaranoFan does have an immature and volatile nature, posting retirement messages on his talk every time something doesn't go his way, then comes back again. I stand by the reasons in my AFD nomination. You don't agree with me, I don't agree with you. That's okay, but the wider picture does have to be looked at. Thought I'd post here as the nomination was archived.  — ₳aron 07:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Block notices

Hey mang, re: this edit, from what I learned from Bishonen when I restored Barbaro's last sanction notice, there is apparently no rule about this, although there used to be. Discussion here. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Mrschimpf, I reverted your last edit to that talk page (I had it in my watchlist since I was the one that blocked them). A user is free to remove just about anything from their talk page, including block notices, but we as editors are certainly not allowed to edit, redact or remove other's comments from anywhere. If the user wants to clear their talk page completely then let them, otherwise just leave it alone. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Mizzou Arena

I started a new talk page discussion regarding how the Paige naming will be handled in the article. There has never been consensus as you claim. I waited two weeks with no responses. You will be free to make your case as to why "Paige Sports Arena" should be featured in bold and why the mention of the brief episode in the History section is not adequate. Eodcarl (talk) 22:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea who all might be interested parties. The correct answer is for you to leave my edits then start a discussion. There was never a consensus, not even close. I will give it more time, but I can't make people discuss it. You don't get to decide what will be reverted. Eodcarl (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

It would be on me if there was more than just you objecting. I made my case for why I believe the change in appropriate and you, and only you are staking a claim to what will or will not be in the article. I started a discussion, even though it would be on you. The current version was not the result of consensus, so I can change it without consensus. Eodcarl (talk) 00:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

This article has been re-created and is at AfD for the fourth time. Your comments will be welcome. I am notifying everyone who contributed to the previous AfDs. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Fourth AfD has been closed as speedy-delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Amber Alert SMS.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amber Alert SMS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fazbear7891 (talk) 22:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)