User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 27
|
#01 · (May 2005—December 2007) |
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Deletion discussion about List of programs broadcast by JCTV & JUCE TV
Hello, Mrschimpf, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of programs broadcast by JCTV & JUCE TV, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by JCTV & JUCE TV.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 03:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Disruptive editing by IP hoppers
Think we should semi-protect all TV station articles? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:36, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Mvcg66b3r: In all likelihood, it would probably be easier and more effective to ask for an appropriate block of the IP rather than ask to have all of the TV station articles protected. -- Dolotta (talk) 22:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television § Changes to Infobox television channel?. Raymie (t • c) 03:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Zeeworld
You've deleted my edits from Zeeworld, I've put accurate information there but now you rather delete the whole page because it's of no use. JudahPrerna (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
File:KIAH 2018 Logo.png
Hi Mrschrimpf. I'm just curious as to why you added {{Orphaned non-free revisions}} to this file's page with this edit. The file is licensed as {{PD-logo}} which means it's not covered by WP:NFCC or WP:F5. Was it your intention to convert the file back to a non-free license? Is the version you uploaded quite different from the one it replaced? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Removing the list of stations that aired What a Country! (1986-87)
Your rational for removing the list of stations that originally aired the sitcom What a Country back in the '80s doesn't make sense. You said and I quote "show was in syndication; list of stations not needed". Syndication isn't like a network like ABC, NBC, or CBS, where at least in regards to Wikipedia, you can find a readily made list of all of the affiliates to the dedicated cities and markets. And why do you say that a list of stations is not needed when it was in syndication. If anything, you're thinking from a backwards perspective. Again, the whole point of syndication is that a station will purchase the show and then air it essentially at any time of their choosing. They don't have a uniform like schedule like you see on a network. BornonJune8 (talk) 07:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's extremely and incredibly presumptuous and subjective on your part to say that the "vast majority of people don't care where it aired in Cheyenne, Wyoming". I live in Northern California, and I for one am always curious for which local station of mine aired a first-run syndicated program. You can't just take the position of "just because I personally don't care, why should others". And I didn't even bother with the timeslots like you mentioned. I wanted to keep things as simple as possible by merely listing the city and the station. And as for Star Trek: The Next Generation, if you're worried about 70% of the main article being covered by more than 200 sources, then I don't see any problem in merely creating a brand new article devoted to its syndication coverage. Star Trek: TNG unlike any other syndicated show of its era, has much more than a singular, "main" article, given what franchise it belongs to. Comparing Star Trek to an obscure, single season '80s sitcom like What a Country is apples and oranges anyway. And saying that all we need to know is that it's a syndicated show would be like saying that we don't need an article that list the CBS network affiliates because all that we need to know is that the show aired on CBS. Again, it goes back to my prior point concerning you being presumptuous and subjective. If it's a syndicated show, then wouldn't it make sense to at the very least specific, where in the major markets like New York, LA, and Chicago aired it? It's also impossible to literally find 180-215 defined television markets that may have aired said syndicated show in the pre-internet era. Again, you can't just use Star Trek: The Next Generation as a direct reason for why there shouldn't be a standard list of affiliates, because this isn't about that show, it's about What a Country, which naturally has less coverage. BornonJune8 (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- The link that you sent me concerns the television or radio station's article and how it would best for editors to not post a comprehensive listing of the station's entire broadcast schedule. It isn't about the shows themselves on said schedule. To put it in another way, we're are discouraged to post a daily schedule for WPIX in New York on that station's individual Wikipedia article. Also, what "other websites" can go into the intricacies of a show's scheduling? And what's not to say that explain which key stations aired a syndicated program isn't remotely important? BornonJune8 (talk) 09:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oh by the way, why do you need to communicate with me in a highly patronizing tone? You twisted what is in those links to the proper polices. Might I reiterate that the link that you initially showed me, doesn't talk specifically about the list of stations that aired an individual program. It was about not making a lengthy section concerning a daily schedule for specific TV or radio station. Why are you twisting what is factually said in there just to make your point> And when I try to reason with you, instead of hearing what I have to say, you become extremely haughty and condescending. And you also deliberately overlook the fact that I provided reliable sources like newspaper articles. You simply focus on YouTube links and try to spin it by saying that Broadcasting magazine (which is as reliable as an industry source that you could find from that era), which is available to the free public (just Google it) doesn't fit as source. You continue to present your point of view from a decidedly subjective area with by saying "This is information the layman in no way cares about." Who is this "layman" that you are referring too besides yourself? BornonJune8 (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The link that you sent me concerns the television or radio station's article and how it would best for editors to not post a comprehensive listing of the station's entire broadcast schedule. It isn't about the shows themselves on said schedule. To put it in another way, we're are discouraged to post a daily schedule for WPIX in New York on that station's individual Wikipedia article. Also, what "other websites" can go into the intricacies of a show's scheduling? And what's not to say that explain which key stations aired a syndicated program isn't remotely important? BornonJune8 (talk) 09:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's extremely and incredibly presumptuous and subjective on your part to say that the "vast majority of people don't care where it aired in Cheyenne, Wyoming". I live in Northern California, and I for one am always curious for which local station of mine aired a first-run syndicated program. You can't just take the position of "just because I personally don't care, why should others". And I didn't even bother with the timeslots like you mentioned. I wanted to keep things as simple as possible by merely listing the city and the station. And as for Star Trek: The Next Generation, if you're worried about 70% of the main article being covered by more than 200 sources, then I don't see any problem in merely creating a brand new article devoted to its syndication coverage. Star Trek: TNG unlike any other syndicated show of its era, has much more than a singular, "main" article, given what franchise it belongs to. Comparing Star Trek to an obscure, single season '80s sitcom like What a Country is apples and oranges anyway. And saying that all we need to know is that it's a syndicated show would be like saying that we don't need an article that list the CBS network affiliates because all that we need to know is that the show aired on CBS. Again, it goes back to my prior point concerning you being presumptuous and subjective. If it's a syndicated show, then wouldn't it make sense to at the very least specific, where in the major markets like New York, LA, and Chicago aired it? It's also impossible to literally find 180-215 defined television markets that may have aired said syndicated show in the pre-internet era. Again, you can't just use Star Trek: The Next Generation as a direct reason for why there shouldn't be a standard list of affiliates, because this isn't about that show, it's about What a Country, which naturally has less coverage. BornonJune8 (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
--Orange Mike | Talk 23:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
List of original programming notability
Hey... There is a there is an ongoing discussion regarding the notability of List of programs broadcast by Asianet. I have checked the article and it has already been stated at the discussion that most of the shows on the list are Original programming but the nom argues that it doesn't make them notable as there is no evidence that the shows are produced by them but there is no evidence that they aren't either, atleast in part and they still are the channel's originals. I pointed that out but they just ended up twisting my words. You have been on Wiki for quite a few years now and specialise in TV so would you be kind enough as to state your opinion there...to get some clarity. Cheers, TheRedDomitor (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Big Ten Network logo
I have added the Big Ten Network 2020 logo liked you asked. If you have any issue with the logo currently, I will be open to pointers as to what to do. David Matoushek (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
RD requests
Howdy hello! A quick note: in the future, when requesting RD via IRC, please stay in the chat until an admin answers your request if you can, that way we can talk to you if need be and you can confirm an admin saw it. An admin isn't always on duty or may have missed it. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Cluebot
This edit was made via Twinkle. I didn't purposely place the notice. Just letting you know. Firestar464 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |