User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Teech/Phill Lewis

Thank you for your good edits. I had found the sources cited in these articles and thought I'd handled the BLP concerns appropriately. You handled them better. Cheers. David in DC (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Rollback granted

I have granted rollback to your account. Please be sure to read WP:ROLLBACK thoroughly and be sure to use to tool to revert no more than simple vandalism, or the function will be removed accordingly. Happy editing to you. Keegan^talk 06:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Agim Dalipi

Hello There!!!!

You reverted my edit to the vandal edition. May I know the reason..Why?

Its Ok...

Hitrohit2001 (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001

I'm taking a break...

Because you have been one of the editors with whom I have a good working relationship, I've decided to write this to you directly.

I'm taking a break from editing for a while. There's too much going on with me in this place that I need to regroup, enjoy the summer, and refocus. I feel that there is a lack of cohesiveness and willingness to share opinions and work together the way we should here, at least in certain areas. Right now, all of this is coming to a head for me, and I've decided to take a step back. I'm not sure when I'll return, but I will. Keep up the good work, and hold the fort until I return. ( :) ) Rollosmokes (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

K36HS

Hi Mrschimpf,

What was the problem with this article? It doesn't appear to have been vandalism, per [1], [2], etc. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Please take another look at

Macaroni soup. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demi Lovato (album)

"...a regular Dethklok..." Hahaha! Cliff smith ^talk 17:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demi Lovato (album)

You voted in this AFD that I started. It is only fair to mention that there has been a substantial change to the article since I nominated it for deletion, in that it now has a release date and a title. You may or may not wish to rethink your vote.
Kww (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Airport notability discussion

You have shown interest in an airport AfD in the past at [[Chadwick Airport] You may wish to visit Stoney Point Airfield and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoney Point Airfield to participate as well. This message is being sent to editors who participated at Chadwick but have not participated at Stoney Point, regardless of the editor's opinion. Thank you!--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyland Software

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyland Software
Hi, I started this article and would like to discuss your reasons for deletion. I understand that I am the primary editor with few exceptions, but can that be an argument since I can't exactly seek out other users to edit it? I am an advocate for NPOV as well; please let me know if I can improve the article. Thanks for your dedication to improving Wikipedia! Kaitlin510 (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Notable deletion users

You have been listed as a notable deletion user on my user subpage User:Mythdon/Notable deletion users. How do you feel?. Mythdon (talk) 10:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing (Film) - A question about what you said

You said that I think wrongly about it being notable I believe you are the wrong one, this fan movie has received massive attention on both the books official site and the official JP Forum and it is excpected to be watched by thousands of people across the internet so I ask you what you see as a reliable source, anyone can edit an internet site. Crazyla112 (talk) 06:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Signature

Why is it that your signature says "Nate"?. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 18:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Troopergate (Bill Clinton)

Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troopergate (Bill Clinton), I thought you might be interested in the further actions going on. The nom sent it to deletion review, has started a topic to try to rename the article something other than Troopergate and is participating in a request to merge the article with another article. Seems like a lot to be going on all at one time and informing you solely because of your previous participation in similar debates. PHARMBOY (TALK) 01:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Pranges.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Pranges.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Where did you hear about the launch date of This TV? And would you please include an article of that launch date?

Where did you hear about the launch date of This TV? And would you please include an article of that launch date via a website? Thank you very much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2008

Thank you for your contributions. In the future, please make sure that your edits match what the sources say, such as the number of votes a candidate has received. The final tallies are not complete, but I'm keeping an eye on them and updating when the sources do. Regards. FangedFaerie (Talk | Edits) 03:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Adrienne Bailon

I am not adding my own personal viewpoint as you put it. I have provided multiple and verifiable sources that have stated (and had proof) that the semi-nude photos were a publicity stunt capitalized on once Bailon's laptop was legitimately stolen. The best you can do is continue blocking my contribution calling it "hearsay" when you thought I didn't have proof to back up what I said. Then when I do, you call it an ex-publicist with an axe to grind. Maybe we should just axe all the negative parts of articles from Wikipedia seeing those would be people or persons with an axe to grind too, right?

Out of respect to the website, I haven't even tried to load it to the main article, yet you feel the need to delete this from the discussion section and for what? It's relevant to the article and if various sites are reporting this it deserves to be looked into..something you obviously haven't done or refuse to do.

If you're talking about a neutral point of view, then why don't you practice what you preach instead of trying to delete something, from a DISCUSSION thread that merits DISCUSSION. 75.89.239.16 (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

75.89.239.16 (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Go ahead, report me....I dare ya! You think I really care if you go "tattle" on me like a little school girl in class? The fact is that I'm providing information on something that has been reported on several sites (not just the 3 I listed) and you continue to constantly erase it from the discussion thread. Not once have I tried to add it to the actual article so your actions up to the point have been egotistical and arrogant of someone who thinks they own the site. If you want to go tell, then go tell. You "threatening" me on the Internet is laughable at best.

What do you think?

Is this our good buddy, or no? I'm seriously considering a checkuser...GJC 04:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

SBTB

The issue is the fact that it's nonsensical to include it. I mean honestly, I wouldn't mind it being there, if all the other shows were saying they had it too..and the point being that no one finds that measly bit of info important. Ok they have E/I in the corner, it's almost like saying there is a NBC symbol..pointless, because everyone knows a kid show will have some kind of symbol like that at some point in the show.--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 02:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Trisha16

Done--I blanked and protected the talk page and redirected it to the user page. Probably should have been done a lot sooner with this guy's socks. Blueboy96 13:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)