User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 → Archive 15

20:09:02, 7 February 2018 review of submission by ZenaDC-Logal

Your review of this article makes clear that Opt IN USA is being required to be a notable initiative per Wikipedia standards as opposed to an initiative of a notable organization, i.e., National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. (NJCDLP). Flexibility for our draft is evident from Wikipedia's guidance at Wikipedia article at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). Moreover, every advocate specifically identified by our draft and credited with helping NJCDLP advance to Opt IN USA has an article or is footnoted in an article on Wikipedia or has not been subjected to markedly disparaging, public reviews by Wikipedia editors as has NJCDLP.** Yet Wikipedia has shown itself unwilling to be a forum for NJCDLP and its Opt IN USA initiative despite NJCDLP being a member of the Global Net 21 Network, the U.S. Human Rights Network, MAHB (The Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere), and the United Nations Association of the United States of America Council of Organizations. This unfortunate situation only helps underscore the vulnerability of average Americans to institutionalized oppression under color of law. ** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesselyn_Radack; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Project; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Whistleblowers_Center; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsha_Coleman-Adebayo; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marshals_Service#Racial_discrimination at footnote 40.

ZenaDC-Logal (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

ZenaDC-Logal I have literally no idea what you're on about with disparaging reviews but yes, we do require notability for all subjects. See WP:NOTABILITY. Given all the "we" in this comment, I'd also recommend you review WP:COI and WP:PAID and disclose appropriately. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

21:41:42, 7 February 2018 review of submission by ZenaDC-Logal

 Since consideration of whether Wikipedia's public reviews of the Opt IN USA draft are markedly disparaging does not hinge on your understanding of the matter, feel free to let me know if anyone else with your organization would like me to elaborate on the subject.  Also, I could not locate a reference to "we" in any of my responses to the Wikipedia reviews of my Opt IN USA draft, contrary to your last message.  In contrast, you note that "we do require notability for all subjects", and I presume that by "we" you mean Wikipedia.  So are the requirements you reference different from those set out at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) because I edited the Opt IN USA draft in accord with those guidelines.

ZenaDC-Logal (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

The "we" I was referring to in your response were the several times you said "our" draft. I was mistaken to say "we" as I am not the whole of Wikipedia but a member of the Wikipedia community which sets these guidelines and policies (ie. notability.) I have no idea what disparaging remarks you're referring to however if you are affiliated with this organization that you are writing about, please review the policies I previously linked. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @ZenaDC-Logal: Please also see the messages I left for you on your Talk page. General Ization Talk 21:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

09:33:34, 8 February 2018 review of submission by OliveTree


OliveTree (talk) 09:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


Hi Chrissymad

It's been a while, but I suddenly remembered I hadn't asked you what I could do to try and improve the sources? I thought they were pretty extensive.

Many thanks OliveTree

OliveTree (talk) 09:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For your work on the IRC #wikipedia-en-help channel, where you are seemingly always online, helping new users and defending the wiki from vandals, trolls, and the like. Know that your efforts are greatly appreciated. :)

Vermont | reply here 19:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:22:16, 9 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Tomgiebel


Greetings! Thanks for your feedback, revisions are underway. Question though, can you explain how the citations under Notable Publications are copyvios? They were just citations, no actual content copied. Tomgiebel (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Tomgiebel

Tomgiebel (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Tomgiebel, the citations are not copyvios, it was all of the other text that Chrissymad removed that had been copied from elsewhere. Publication lists aren't usually copyrightable. Primefac (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Monica Valentinelli

Might you reconsider your !vote on Monica Valentinelli, now that the article has been sourced? Newimpartial (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Notability criteria seem to be clearly met now; could you take a look? Newimpartial (talk) 23:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Newimpartial This is bordering on canvassing. I do check the articles I vote on at AfD or nominate periodically (and they're both on my watchlist) so if I feel my vote needs to be reevaluated, I will. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I would not think that asking a nom to look at the current sourcing of an article they nominated for AfD for notability reasons - an article for which thd NOM did not apparently look for inproved sources, but lo and behold there are now sources - would be considered canvassing. More a reminder of WP:BEFORE, which may not have been sufficiently thorough in this case. Newimpartial (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I did plenty of WP:BEFORE. The sources now are still insufficient.
I'd still consider repeatedly asking someone to reconsider their vote canvassing at this point. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most experienced editors will look at changes and follow the discussion and change their vote if they desire.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

You may "consider" it as you like, but iif I believe an INVOLVED editor has made a mmistake, it is within my rights to point iit out on TALK. Newimpartial (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

seeking resolution

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

I have closed Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Alexei Navalny#Link to his official YouTube site as negotiation on the talk page will now continue. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Francisco Lopez de Villalobos has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Francisco Lopez de Villalobos. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Updated draft

Hi Chrissymad. Please take a new look at the updated version of my draft (with third party sources added) about the documentary Shocking Exposures. Thanks In my solitude (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC) In my solitude (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Reviewing drafts

Hi I wonder if you might consider reviewing two drafts that I've created and optimised:

Draft:Laponia (documentary) Draft:Shocking Exposures: Images That Changed Science

The references are checked and the stills are currently being released through OTRS. They should therefore both be ready for publication now. Could you please consider reviewing and if ok moving them from Drafts? Much obliged:) In my solitude (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC) In my solitude (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

In my solitude One of the drafts I've removed a copyvio however I agree with the other reviewer that in order for them to be accepted you need to have independent reliable sources which cover both subjects in depth. Currently all of your sources are primary or non-rs. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chrissymad. Please take a new look at the updated version of my draft (with third party sources added) about the documentary Shocking Exposures. Thanks In my solitude (talk) 09:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:CBAN for My Royal Young. Iggy (Swan) 00:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rashad Nabiyev

Dear friend, This is second time I am writing to you. You ignored me 1st time, but I ask you not to do this. I will try to explain you again. The person about whom I am creating the page is the CEO of the satellite operator Azercosmos. There is no reason to promote him. Other CEOs, for ex. CEO of Arianespace Stéphane Israël, CEO of Telenor Sigve Brekke have their wiki pages, so I just want to create the wiki page for the CEO of the only national satellite operator of my country - Azerbaijan. If it is promotion then why you do not delete the wiki pages of other CEOs as well? See?, "promotion argument" becomes invalid. Talking about the second argument - "copyright". After the 1st time You deleted the article, I started all from the scratch. I re-writed everything, paraphrased all what could be paraphrased, only facts were left. I put links/references to almost all sentences one by one. Be honest, If I mind to plagiarize, I would not put the references. So, please, instead of deleting the article without considering how many hours the one spent to create it, how much effort the one put to make it wikipedian, how many times the one revised it before publishing, just show the way to paraphrase the fact (if it possible). I do really appreciate your care about copyright issues, but, please, try to understand and see the differences before simply deleting the article. So, I kindly ask you to return the page back and show what and how to change. Thank you for your time. ZahraGasim (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-duplicate post, see User_talk:Primefac#Speedy_deletion_of_Rashad_Nabiyev. Primefac (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

20:04:34, 12 February 2018 review of submission by Fieldsde


Hello -- First, thanks for your reviews and suggestions re "Tennessee Valley Interstellar Workshops". I perhaps should have requested clarification from the previous editor, since I may be missing something.

Since last submitting, I've added additional (more) notable citations but before I resubmit, I wonder if I should remove many of the self-referencing citations (to the tviw.us website). For example, 5 of these point to each set of videos for each Symposium. Perhaps a robot is calculating a ratio and indeed, there really are a lot of tviw.us citations.

Best regards and again, thanks for your patient efforts. David

Fieldsde (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sena Ehrhardt

Hi Im the administrator of the Sena Ehrhardt Page that was denied. Thanks for the quick review, I really appreciate it. This was my first attempt at submitting anything on Wikipedia and I would like to get this right, so I have some questions if you don't mind... You said that I have Violations of Copyright in my page but I thought if I cited all my sources then its ok? You also said that my article acts as an advertisement instead of an entry into an Encyclopedia, could you give me an example from my article why its an advertisement? I don't know, Maybe you meant that it has a lot of adjectives in there when it should be just pure facts.

Please let me know what Im doing wrong more in depth. Thank you for your time. SPorganica (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPorganica (talk • contribs) 18:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

SPorganica What do you mean by administrator of the page? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
I suspect they mean "creator". Primefac (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker – please do not ping on reply)

Yes I meant creator... SPorganica (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPorganica (talk • contribs) 18:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy declined

Re : this tag. In doing triage (and subsequently declining) with a news search, I came across this picture. As punishment for a bad speedy, you are hereby sentenced to come up with a humorous and witty caption for that photograph. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I’ve got some good ones but for that but the tag wasn’t intentional. I thought I tagged something else. :’) let’s blame it on 4 days of no sleep. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hey - I think Mrs May used that excuse for this. :-P Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Restore deleted draft please

hi CHRISSYMAD, could you please restore the draft of the page on the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, so that I can further work on it and visualize the comment from Robert McClenon that I did not have a chance to see before the draft was deleted? I did not save the draft elsewhere and had spent some time researching references, so would be grateful if that work did not go wasted. Thanks Ewa hermanowicz (talk) 10:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Ewa hermanowicz, Chrissymad did not delete the draft; you'll have to discuss the issue with the deleting administrator RHaworth. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)


Response to sourcing question

Just confused about your response to my question about citing Frank Rogers's page. It's not promotional, it's all facts about him and the current page that is up about him is 100% incorrect. Am I citing my sources incorrectly? Please tell me how to fix this. I need to get it updated as soon as possible. need to get it updated as soon as possible.

JessicaHoneycutt I explained on your talk page. Please respond there and I will also respond there. Before you continue to edit you should review the policy I linked you to. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Praxidicae. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Request on 04:50:43, 14 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Rick Rampton


Hi Chrissymad,

I would like to have your assistance in making the Wikipedia page up for QASource according to the guidelines (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rick_Rampton). I have made the changes as per your first recommendation that the content should not be a promotion or looks like an ad. I would also like to share that I have taken an example from the live Wikipedia page i.e. A1QA to construct this company page. Please assist me in this process.

Thank you and have a great day, Rick

Rick Rampton (talk) 04:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

12:33:23, 14 February 2018 review of submission by OliveTree


Dear Chrissymad

Thank you for reviewing it, I've now added some sources about the showrooms and removed a couple of references to awards. Could you kindly advise if this should now be deemed acceptable? Thanks!

OliveTree (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

OliveTree (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

NYC Architecture

Thank you for your message. I rewrote the page with the purpose of providing only objective, verifiable information. I included references for every piece of information using high quality sources as references. Could you please clarify for me what your last message means? My answer to your message as it stands now is that I have an interest in New York City architecture and if someone was to tell me that I have a conflict of interest, my response would be that my interest in architecture involves a subjective element which is based on what I like and dislike in architecture. In order to counter that subjective component, in any article I contribute to I make sure to reference everything that I write. I would appreciate any helpful feedback you could give me to further clarify the question you are asking and how to improve my edits of pages going forward. Thank you. DoegePotter (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)DoegePotter

CIM Group

I believe you deleted the page created for the real estate investment firm CIM Group, which developed several building's with their own Wikipedia pages, including 432 Park Avenue in New York City, the tallest residential building in the Western Hemisphere. Could you please provide additional information regarding the reason you do not believe this company warrants its own page given the number of existing pages that reference it? Thank you DoegePotter (talk) 17:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

DoegePotter, it's likely because CIM Group seems to only be notable for building 432 Park Avenue. If you think it should have it's own page, you're welcome to start a Draft using the Article Wizard, which will be reviewed by experienced editors after submission. Primefac (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)


Primefac, Thank you for your reply. Going forward I will do what you suggest. Is this the correct forum to follow up with editors regarding comments or changes? Can I expect a reply from Chrissymad? DoegePotter (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)DoegePotter
Sure, if you have questions for Chrissymad this is definitely the place to ask. I just happen to be watching her page and can (sometimes) respond more quickly than her. Primefac (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


Primefac Thanks again for the advice. If you have the time, I would also appreciate help with the topic listed above this one regarding architecture and conflicts of interest. My conflict of interest, simply put, is that I have an interest in New York City architecture and therefore anything I write could potentially be impacted by my subjectivity. However, in order to counter that I always include high-quality references including induatry books and widely read induatry publications to backup whatever I write. With regard to the page on 15 William, every statement is supported by a citation from at least one high quality research source. So I don't know how else to answer this editor's question other than saying that anyone who writes or edits anything on Wikipedia will have a subjective bias to some extent. The best way to counter that bias however is to include solid references for everything. In addition, some of the changes the editor made to the article did not reflect what was explicitly stated in the referenced source. I suppose one thing I can do going forward is to include more direct quotations from the sources I use so that there is no question that what I am writing is explicitly what was said and intended by the referenced source. DoegePotter (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)DoegePotter
DoegePotter I haven't responded as we keep ecing so please use the preview button instead of posting 5+ times in a row. I still do not see anything that indicates that the subject matter warrants a standalone article as all the sources were WP:PRIMARY. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Chrissymad Thank you for your reply. I apologize for the difficulty in communicating, I am new to this part of Wikipedia. When you have the time, I would also like to clarify your question regarding COI for the topic listed above this one. I briefly described my response in this section and in the section above and would appreciate any further guidance. DoegePotter (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)DoegePotter

Matsui Nursery

Hey, I fixed the copyright infringement. I hadn't edit it when I was forced to publish prematurely. Now it is, and does not infringe. Youngnoah (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Youngnoah

Youngnoah The copyright still remains in the text *and* in the history. It has to be deleted by an admin to be removed.CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Good job! Tikollozo (talk) 20:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Brigade (company) spam?

Hello,

In regards to your revert of the change I made (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brigade_(disambiguation)&action=history), would the link having been internal been better (I'm slowly working on a very basic page for the company), or do you consider it spam to have the listing there at all?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herbstmb (talk • contribs) 22:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Doubt clarification regarding my edits.

Hi,Can you tell me why you have removed my editings in the "list of magazines in India" even though I have cited reliable sources. Rishi Muni (talk) 06:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Rishi Muni Because entries that do not have Wikipedia articles do not belong on that list, they were all primary sources (ie. their own website) and see also WP:WTAF. Pinging NeilN who removed the edits as well. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


Mila Jam and Britney Houston Merger

Hi Chrissymad,

I checked out the merger page you sent me. I included numerous sources as for the reason I was merging the two pages. Britney Houston and Mila Jam are the same person. During transition, Mila Jam performed under the stage name 'Britney Houston', but now goes only by Mila Jam. This is the reason for the merger. It's simply a duplicate page. Could you please reinstate the merge? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolarsson (talk • contribs) 20:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Nicolarsson It has to be merged via the history because of attribution. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chrissy, I posted the merge request on Mila Jam's page. From what I understand, only an administrator can merge the two pages? Please let me know if there is anything I can do! Also, someone proposed deletion of 'Mila Jam' but I do not think it is warranted with all of the external references and citations that she has. Please let me know if I am misunderstanding. Thank you. All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolarsson (talk • contribs) 21:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

your username

Hi.
All this time I used to think you are a guy. But few hours ago when I thanked you for your edit, it said, you thanked chrissy for her edit , and I was like:
See you around :) —usernamekiran(talk) 22:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Chrissy u mad at me?
See what I did there? —usernamekiran(talk) 00:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
@Usernamekiran: Is there a reason you needed to point out this user's gender in your work to improve this site? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 23:49, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
@Coffee: Hi. erm... Well, not exactly. I was under under impression that Crissy was a male (like chris or christopher). I am not sure when or where exactly, but in the distant past, I have interacted with Chrissy. I just wanted to let her know that I didnt know she was a lady, and wanted to apologise if I had said something inappropriate.
But she didnt reply to my message, and then I sort of forgot the original reason :-/ —usernamekiran(talk) 02:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name

You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified! You personify an administrator without tools, and have gained my support; already!

To go with the section above, and to expand on my support, I suggest you consider approaching some experienced editors about possible nominations - TNT❤ 14:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

I wouldn't nominate Chrissymad and I can furnish several diffs with what I consider personal attacks that I would use in a well-documented oppose !vote. Sorry, but I don't want you to bring up false hope. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
You've made your point already. Stop WP:HOUNDING this user. You're entitled to your opinion, and thankfully so is the rest of our editorial community. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: WP:HUSH. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: diffs please, just dump them below. Nick (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: again, diffs please. Unfounded accusations won't pass muster - TNT❤ 13:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: it has been 24 hours since the last request for a diff. !dave 13:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
I already linked the conversation I felt was problematic above. Now, I notice Chrissymad has ignored this discussion and moved onto other things, so why can't you all do the same. If she wants to contact me by email and discuss adminship in more depth, I'm quite happy to do so. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:RFA

You have established an excellent track record in administrative areas. I’m always seeing CSD nominations and UAA reports from you that are on point and accurate. Have you considered running for adminship yourself? I think you have a very good chance and would be good at it. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Do it! Do it! --NeilN talk to me 21:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
+1 TonyBallioni (talk) 21:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
+2 GMGtalk 21:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, thank you and thank you. Can this count as RfA? ;)i'm kidding, of course CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
+3 - TNT❤ 22:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I dunno. Chrissy's only made 2 File_talk edits. Also, we know about that time in 3rd grade that you kicked the other kid for taking all the blue legos. Oppose Clearly not cut out to be an admin. SQLQuery me! 23:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
+5 !dave 14:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Looks like I’m not the only one who has noticed. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
I concur with this edit summary. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but in my view Chrissymad has a reputation of biting newbies and being trigger-happy on the templates - as a starter for ten, see the above thread on this talk page from me marked "Speedy declined", and on User talk:Ritchie333/Archive 61#Greater Noida FC where I said "You need to stop getting angry at people who disagree with you or who have other priorities in life. If you can't do that, I'd suggest a short wikibreak.", and this user appears to be a regular at User:SoWhy/List of declined speedies. If I thought Chrissymad could do the job, I would have nominated already. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

So, what you're saying is that you have some sort of a grudge? Cool man. SQLQuery me! 00:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm quite amused that this editor is bringing up biting newbies and civility issues. --NeilN talk to me 00:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
This entire statement is just rich. But, "If I thought Chrissymad could do the job, I would have nominated already." Has to be the most egotistical comment I've seen from an administrator yet. I guess it's a good thing RFAs aren't determined by one vote... — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I nominated nine successful candidates for RfA last year, and regularly seek out new ones, so I would like to think my research works. Somebody with minimal content creation skills and a poor CSD record is not going to pass, based on the hundreds of RfAs I’ve looked at. I'm not saying any of this to be mean or vindicative, but these are just the plan statistics I see and the odds are not good. If Chrissymad wants to try some content writing (your work on Fannie Lou Hamer for example, Coffee, was an excellent example of that), then great, let's do some of that and maybe we can look at an RfA later in the year. But I think BU Rob13 said it best here to be honest. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I'd support an RFA. Vermont | reply here 17:39, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Outrageous Deletion

MAD..re Philo. of sc. and Islam...You put it for discussion....No one discussed it..10 minutes later you put it for deletion...Edgar came after one hour and deleted it....Are you one and the same administrator? ..or you guys done it on the phone or emailed each other...This is outrageous and tyrannical ...You should have waited for a proper discussion...You are administrators not owners of WP--Haywi (talk) 21:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Haywi: It was discussed here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sciences in the Qur'an --NeilN talk to me 18:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
NeilN ..First ,it is odd that you answer for MAD on his/her page,not on mine or yours ..or are you one and the same (I note that it is a common practice on WP to have more than one account, prohibited though)...or are you his/her attorney or spokesman ? Secondly, had you read the discussion on the previously rejected "Sciences in the Quran" carefully you would've noted that its size and style which was in question, but the content was praised...it was about 200 pages long.Thirdly, they are different cattle of fish . Fourthly ,You cannot and should not incriminate Darren for what his brother also called Darren had committed, and delete an extensive work in a whim with a click..THE DELETED PAGE SHOULD GO INTO DISCUSSION FIRST...I don't mind if you ask the help of other administrators, again another known malpractice on WP...as long as it is done as per regulations. Contributors have rights as you have.--Haywi (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The recreated version was substatially similar to the already deleted version, meaning no discussion was needed. Wikipedia is not a place for essays about philosophy, it is an encyclopedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
As the deleting admin from the first AfD, I concur with my colleagues above. It contained content that was essentially forked from the deleted article. It had already been discussed. G4 applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@Haywi: You asked the question here, so I answered here. Editors watch other editors' talk pages and there's nothing odd about joining discussions there - it's standard community practice. As to content, please realize that Wikipedia will not host your essays about a subject, recreated from past deleted articles or otherwise. --NeilN talk to me 20:50, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

YGM

Check your mail, please:)~ Winged BladesGodric 06:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

On a side-note, nothing much to do except my advice at the corresponding t/p.~ Winged BladesGodric 11:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Edits Removed

Hi chrissymad,

I was wondering if you could clarify why my edits for the National Pollutant Release Inventory was rejected and if you could explain what I could do in order to make edits as the page is old and an update is needed.

Thanks, TBot2018 (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)TBot2018 [1]

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TBot2018#February_2018

Rebecca Soler edits

I've tagged her alias as currently being disputed and commented out the related entries. Right now it is not clear whether the editor that said "I am Rebecca Soler" is verified to be her. Your statement of "there is no evidence to support this being the same person" is incorrect, as references have been provided to indicate that her roles in Yu-Gi-Oh refer to the same person and those have stayed there for years. The evidence is now also posted to the talk page in case the infobox wasn't clear. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments on her talk page and the OTRS. I think her request overrides any contention over whether the sources provided were reliable as even if there were ones found, the request means it can go away. They weren't that strong anyway, even if I were to go through the show's credits and confirm Paquet's name consistently on the closing credits on the shows in question. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:59, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Rethink your life

Upon seeing your overzealous edits, deletions, reference removals and now your talk page, it seems you have a habit of being a Wikinazi leopheard (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Now that's not very nice. GMGtalk 17:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Indeed, it isn't. I expect it will not happen again. Primefac (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Leopheard! I appreciate your concerns, could you please let me know which edits you're talking about? Cheers! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

  • United States Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
  • Germany FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
  • India Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
  • United States Ceranthor, India Numerounovedant, Minnesota Carbrera, Netherlands Farang Rak Tham and Romania Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

19:47:28, 2 March 2018 review of submission by Sbraiden


Sbraiden (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


Hi, Chrissy. Thanks so much for reviewing the article that I submitted on Karolyn Hart yesterday. I have cleaned it up, removing external links to references by the person the article was about, and also removing body copy that was perhaps causing issues with neutrality. As I am a new Wikipedia contributor I am wondering if you might help me identify other potential problem areas I may have missed? I am very grateful for your time and assistance. Thanks in advance for anything you might offer to help me ensure I am keeping within guidelines and contributing in a useful manner.

Sbraiden (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

13:39:47, 5 March 2018 review of submission by Rajeshsingri


Updated the content and the citations as instructed requesting you to kindly relook. awaiting your approval

Rajeshsingri (talk) 13:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Zingle edits

Hi there

thanks for your comments about my article on Dr Zoe Svendsen. I know Zoe and was creating the page for her as a surprise, her work on World Factory is becoming famous. Anyway, I basically wanted to put up her factual CV which I took from her website. This is what is cited as copyright violation. However I have just read that if I get her written permission I could use the content from her website. Can you confirm that is correct, also now the article is deleted, can i retrieve it in any way do you know please.. thanks for your help. Columbian Winedot (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Columbian Winedot The content from her website is not appropriate whether there is permission or not as the notability of a subject needs to be established by independent reliable sources. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
I would add that posting a CV is something that is explicitly outside the scope of Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello

I have diligently worked my way through all the tutorials going and do think that what I posted is factual and correct, I have looked at the page you directed me to and think that World Factory comes under the banner creative work and should be mentioned. Maybe my use of wording was misleading, it is not a CV that 'sells' Zoe Svendsen it is more of a biog listing her areas of work, which I can provide citations to. Columbian Winedot (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Blogs, resume, it's all the same. What Beeblebrox and I said still applies. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Rahul Singh (actor, born 1985)

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

This article is already reviewed. There is no need for any discussion Xenon One (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Xenon One I beg to differ and an article having been reviewed does not mean it's exempt from AfD. Especially considering it was not reviewed and you moved it to main space yourself. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Chrissymad can you please tell me the reason for deletion notice? Xenon One (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Xenon One I made it very clear in the linked discussion. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Chrissymad why you removed the two websites? Xenon One (talk) 18:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

They were not even remotely reliable. Please read what I wrote in the discussion as I've outlined it very clearly there. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Chrissymad you wrote that those two websites were spam, right? Ok then but there are three reliable sources present there. Also, why did you removed instagram from the external link section? Xenon One (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

My article was reviewed by Atlantic306. I can send you the screenshot if you want. Xenon One (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

For the last time, I explained in my edit summary and in detail in the AfD. Being reviewed does not make an article exempt from AfD.CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Here is the link→https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 He has already reviewed my article and there is no need for discussion. Xenon One (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

When this discussion will finish? Xenon One (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Xenon One I dunno if this is a serous cause of WP:IDHT or what, but it's literally detailed on the top of the very article you've linked. And for the final time, a page being reviewed does not mean it is exempt from AfD. Ever. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

But why you dunno? I mean you've placed my article for deletion so you must know when this discussion will finish? Xenon One (talk) 18:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


A big thanks!

Mam as you have closed the discussion (once again, thanks) can i remove the notice of deletion? Xenon One (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Xenon One Stop. I did not close the AfD. I closed the discussion on my talk because you're either ignoring what I've said or you are spectacularly misunderstanding what Wikipedia is. If you want to discuss the article further, do it in the AfD and not here on my talk page. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


Why you have labeled these websites as spam?

1 http://www.bollywoodpopular.com/2017/09/actor-rahul-singh.html?m=1

2 http://www.starbhaarat.com/kya-haal-mr-paanchal-shows-jijaji-rahul-singh-l-biography/

These websites are not blogs and not any social media website. Then please, please tell me why you have marked these websites as "spam" ? Xenon One (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Any questions you have please take them to the AfD as I am not going to continue discussing this here. As far as starbhhaarat, well for starters, you should read this as it explains very clearly it is not reliable and it's fan run. The other one is literally a blog. But as I said, I have given you every explanation and I will not discuss it any further outside of the Afd. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Zingle Edits

Hello Chrissymad, Can you please clarify which sourcing is incorrect or against BPs? I've read through the sourcing guidelines and it's still unclear to me why these sources are not adequate or what needs to be done differently. Appreciate your additional guidance in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnice111 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for reverting Emirates of the United Arab Emirates before we'd have to do it manually. Have a kitten! Kittens make everything better! 🐱

Se'taan (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

22:31:24, 8 March 2018 review of submission by 216.113.160.81


Hello, I would like to request a re-review of Draft:Ottamuri Velicham. The movie has won 4 awards at the Kerala State Film Awards 2017, including Best Feature Film. I've added this bit to the article. Request you to please approve. Thanks! --216.113.160.81 (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

216.113.160.81 (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Honey, Inc.

Hi Chrissymad - this draft's had a Review in progress tag on it since 5/3. To me, it looks like an advert and I keep meaning to propose for SD. Are you planning to close it up anytime soon? Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Feel free to tag, that's what I meant to do but forgot! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks. I'll get on to it. KJP1 (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

boing

Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Draft:Peter_W_Weber.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

11:27:09, 12 March 2018 review of submission by Brapacc


Hello thanks to review my article. Could you explain more about "reliable sources"? May I retrieve information directly from an editor? Thank you for your patience, I am quite new. Brapacc (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)brapacc Brapacc (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

SPI additions

When adding new suspected socks to an investigation, please be sure to also add a comment explaining that's what you're doing if clerical work on the investigation has already started. Not doing this can make it look like the clerk has evaluated an account they've never even seen, like happened here. There was no harm done here, but please bear this in mind in future. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

If you notice the timing, it was an edit conflict (and it didn't show.) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Raymond Neutra Draft

Thanks for the feedback on my article draft. I reworded the content, sliced and diced some sections, and added additional sources. This is my first article, and so any suggestions or additional feedback would be greatly appreciated. Jsbmhca 717 (talk) 01:28, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

17:14:37, 13 March 2018 review of submission by Mdeeny94


Mdeeny94 (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


Hi there,

it says you have declined my article because it reads too much like an ad.

Have you any suggested tips for me to fix this?

All feedback appreciated!

Mdeeny94 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdeeny94 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Thomas Mor Alexandrios

Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Thomas Mor Alexandrios, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not clear what this page is blocking? G6 is invalid for redirects left behind as a result of a routine page move, and community consensus is for retaining Draft->Mainspace redirects. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:04, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi

I noticed you doing an AfD on a bitcoin-esque article, there is a discussion on Talk:Cryptocurrency which may be of interest. Prince of Thieves (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Fucah Technologies Limited

There's been articles under different names? --NeilN talk to me 19:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Fucah Technologies and some other variations. In the middle of a sock hunt right now but I'll put together a list in a bit. ;) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:FOSSASIA

I have tried to clean up the DRAFT:FOSSASIA. Now, the article has fewer but important references, and the content is a bit organized. But, the current references in the article, that's all I could gather. It looks like there aren't many reliable resources about the organization that could increase its notability further. The article looks good to me and I have added more information about the organization's projects and initiatives. It would be great if you could help review the article. Srishti Sethi (talk) 05:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Oceana Rain Stuart page

I just noticed that you reverted changes that I made to remove two issue tags listed for the Oceana Rain Stuart page. I believe I've satisfactorily addressed two of three issues listed (notability, subjectivity) via a number of improvements to the article, and have provided reply messages to the users who originally applied the tags, but with no response. I'm new to Wikipedia, and cannot seem to find any description of the process to appeal issues that have been fixed. If this article sits unresolved for weeks/months, in the absence of input from the original reviewers, and the author cannot remove the tags him/herself, it seems there is a hole in the process that potentially leaves materials stuck and unpublished. Pdtompkins (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

@Pdtompkins: the issue is not that author cannot remove the tags him/herself, but the fact you have not satisfactorily addressed the issues with the article. The article is lacking in reliable sources, and there are still issues with the way it is written. Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Warnings

I appreciate your efforts to keep wikipedia accurate but your claims seem unsubstantiated. Lets focus on the discussion at hand, which is improving the notability of a newly established company (Verizon Connect). Rather than removing citations and scolding users, why not try to help by locating some secondary references? Jasonleedodd (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Or maybe stop copying and pasting copyrighted content and promotional material. We can't manufacture notability. The sources simply don't exist. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

I'm not familiar with reporting sock puppets, but Vivyx and this IP[1] are admitted socks of WelcometoJurassicPark‎, and keep disrupting articles with spurious size estimates. FunkMonk (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

@FunkMonk: If you want to report sock puppet, you can go to WP:SPI. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Oh, thanks, that wasn't nearly as hard as I thought. FunkMonk (talk) 09:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

12:55:03, 20 March 2018 review of submission by Amc2908


Hello,

Thank you for reviewing the article. I am uncertain what do you mean by "reliable sources", as all the sources I have used are published articles in Norwegian newspapers. Could you please explain me more about this, or give me some suggestions regarding this matter?

Looking forward to your answer!

Best regards, Amc2908Amc2908 (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Amc2908 (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Sock

Hi Chrissymad, can you please check if there has been significant overlap between User:KarthikSKS and Pakistanpedia or Ptcloof khan. This user has been creating BLPs, very similar behaviour to those of blocked socks. --Saqib (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Please post content to draft/my user space

Can you userfy my contributed material at Joseph Bishop for me? I did a lot of work on it. Thanks!--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Hodgdon's secret garden I am not an administrator and even if I were, copyrighted content cannot be restored. But if you'd like to double check this, you should ask @Ritchie333:. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Text was written an original phrase here, this being reworked multiple times, then another original phrase there, with appended sourcing (of course from the AP, DesNews/other Utah news sites). I can understand that the nature of the content might be problematic in a blp but where would be massive/any copyvio (resulting of course with the article's history in its entirety blanked too)?--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hodgdon's secret garden I am not an administrator, it wasn't written in "original phrasing", it was word for word taken from the source I posted on the talk page. Revision deletion deletes all the impacted text. Please ask the deleting administrator for further clarification as I'm not sure what else was removed. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I've viewed the deleted copy - and as Chrissymad mentions - a lot of it is copied directly from here. SQLQuery me! 18:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I never went there. My material related to the 1984 incident at the MTC.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
You can see in article history dozens of my contributions are blanked. None of them came from Weber State at all. They were sourced to very current news pieces in the MSM.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
  • This article is drawn from Weber State archived material, I see. (I sent somebody on facebbok this link, along with [2], direct transcript of this oral history by the faculty member there....) But I'm just getting paranoid.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Ritchie333 hooked it up diff. Anyway, thanks!--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Props for your efficient reporting of spambots at AIV today. Working my way through 'em... Yunshui 雲水 14:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Yunshui Thanks! I didn't get to do my normal spambot patrol yesterday so I'm catching up today. There will be some more coming your way. ;) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
...yay? Yunshui 雲水 15:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Good af

Hello About the page Israel Luca Gois, is seeing a mistake, he has high notoriety for us financial market, you are confusing with another person with the similar name, please help us to solve this.

It's a violation of WMF's terms of use, so it doesn't matter. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

How to Report Spam/Vandalism In Nomination of Deletion

Thanks for your message at my talk page. If I believe certain specific nomination of deletion has not followed the policy process required, and shall be considered as vandalism (e.g. do due diligence for WP:N concern before flag it for deletion, what's the right channel to file complaint? Xinbenlv (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Xinbenlv You need to discuss it on the AfD. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Chrissymad: it's not about providing an opinion in the AfD debate itself, it's about how the nomination AfD was conducted. Shouldn't it be a separate place? Xinbenlv (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Xinbenlv Then take it to WP:ANI, I guess. Regardless of what you choose, you can't remove AfD tags for a discussion that is ongoing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Chrissymad, sounds good, thank you for pointing out. I will discuss there. Xinbenlv (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

ACC

Are you sure about your handling of Request #225604 at ACC?! I think a more precise/optimum outcome would be Too similar coupled with an inquiry about whether she, herself ever created the other account! ~ Winged BladesGodric 09:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello there,

Hello Chrissymad, I found a similar care of vandalism which you reverted earlier on simplewiki. Like this one you revert and mine revert. I think those two ips have relation. I am not familiar with this kind of vandalism so I am asking you to review once. Thanks and regards.-BRP ever 16:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

SJS

Look who's back. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Bishop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Bishop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Bishop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hodgdon's secret garden (talk • contribs) 06:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

11:07:19, 26 March 2018 review of submission by Nickjames1984


Hi Chrissymad,

I just wanted to ask which sources you'd still classify as unreliable on the article? I had made changes to address your previous comments and I'm unsure about what needs to be changed now.

Many thanks,

Nick

Nickjames1984 (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Uma Neha S (Singer)

Hi, Please have a look at Uma Neha S (Singer), I think you declined this at AFC under this title Draft:Uma Neha. FITINDIA 13:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

There is, I'm filing the SPI now. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Murz97 (appears to be related) uploaded this image as own work which later used by Proudpurian in his article. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Have you filled the SPI? Raj081238 repeatedly moving their article to mainspace and I just droped a COI notice on his talk page. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 16:52:01, 26 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Atszostek


Hi Chrissymad -

I have a question about reliable sources for this draft article for Endorfin Foods I submitted a few months ago. The company recently received coverage on Good Day Sacramento (CBS): http://gooddaysacramento.cbslocal.com/video/3812771-check-this-out/ and CBS SF Bay Area: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwH3FkM3vH0

Would these sources qualify as reliable sources if I incorporate them as references into the draft?

Thank you for your help, Atszostek (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Atszostek (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Atszostek, local sources such as these are fine for verification purposes. The issue you might find is that using local sources don't do much for notability purposes (local news outlets frequently feature local businesses, so it's not "note-worthy" news). However, if you have a mix of local and national sources that should be covered. Primefac (talk) 12:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Page for deletion

Hello! The page I created is in no way a promotional page for a company or an individual. It's a page for a a rap/pop singer, just like any other page for a musician. Yes, the sources may not be that good but that's all available in English language. I have some links but they're in different languages. Can they be used as references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoveAndArt (talk • contribs) 20:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Well considering the links you've currently used are not at all appropriate, yes, you need to add some actual reliable sources, it doesn't matter what language. And as far as the tone, yes it is still incredibly promotional. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Page for deletion.. again.

I don't know how to response to your reply to earlier section so I had to add a new one. I edited the page, removed some parts which may seem promotional and added a few links. Hope that works. Is the page still up for deletion after all that? LoveAndArt (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Unmarked Draft:Frans Plooij as under review.

Hey! It had been 9 days since you marked it as under review. I unmarked it so that it can get broader attention. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Dial911: After looking at the placement of the sources I have declined the AfC request and tagged it for speedy deletion because the entire article was copied from this link (94.5% violation suspected). GSS (talk|c|em) 06:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks GSS-1987! Dial911 (talk) 08:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Rachel K Collier,

Hi Chrissymad -you've reverted all of the changes I made to the page Rachel K Collier! if there was a bad reference or a problem, is it not possible to keep what is acceptable and remove what isn't, as opposed to just removing all of it? The page is out of date again now, so if you can help make it up to date, accepting which of my amendments are ok (and I'll amend those that aren't) that would be very useful.

Thanks Tigerpunsh (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Tigerpunsh You added copyrighted content and promotional content. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chrissymad -I have just read your comment on my own page and will now suggest amendements via the talk page and otherwise proceed in line with the contents of your post.

Please note however, when reinstating the amendements I made initially, I did revise them, removing the references made from the SXSW article that you deemed promotional. With all due respect, I dont believe you could have read and assessed the changes that I made to consider if they were accceptable or not in the time it took you to undo the revisions! When you pointed out that quotes from the SXSW article could be deemed promotional, I removed all of them, as in hindsight, they were. All remaining amendments however are solely objective and factual and cited correctly -and without these amendments, the article remains four years out of date, so if you can please review them each from an objective basis and reinstate them, that would be appreciated.

With regard copyright infringement, when reinstating the amendments I kept the current accepted image and did not attempt to replace it, so citing copyright infringement again is not valid.

With regard the image uploaded previously, I own this image, and the basis given for it infringing copyright (a post by Beatz by Girls) is also not valid. I will therefore go through the process of having this image reinstated as instructed in accordance with the violation and repost the image in due course.

Many thanks, Tigerpunsh (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Nope

Could you at least improve Nala Smith page, then, DUDDDDDDDDDDEEEEEEE? You are the best, please help improve the page.62.31.81.163 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

No because I'm not going to help you proliferate your 2 year long hoax proliferating garbage. How many personalities is this now? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Ip hopping still constitutes 3rr.

You recently added this to my talk page regarding my actions on the British Isles Naming Dispute page. I've no idea what it means. I'm on my office computer, I presume that's where you're getting "ip hopping" from. I don't know what 3rr is supposed to mean. For the record I've already begun discussing this issue on the article's talk page.198.103.223.51 (talk) 18:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

You've violated the three revert policy. Take it to the talk page and don't remove it again until a consensus has been reached. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Dear Read it carefully

kindly read Wikipedia guidelines and check references and do not put page deletes tag again and again i am hoping you would not make a distributive edit again Nutflatro (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Nutflatro Was the sockpuppetry policy not explained clearly enough to you yesterday? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Praxidicae, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Eliya Cioccolato

At Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kindmind I have tagged two more suspect users onto your report for User:Asji. If you object, please feel free to revert. Dorsetonian (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Reserved ACC requests

Please review your reserved requests and unreserve any you are not currently working. I have already broke 3 or 4. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Please acknowledge this message. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
I can't login right now to acc but will as soon as I get home. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
  • The same goes with OTRS tickets. I have seen too many a ticket which is locked in your name, only to find that the lock timeout expires and the customer is left with no response for four days. If you do not wish to answer a ticket, make sure you unlock them. I've already answered one which only required a simple boilerplate response. Thanks talk to !dave 14:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

02:12:08, 2 April 2018 review of submission by Gilad54321


please help me understand better how this page should look like to be able to publish it. if you can give me some suggestions I will appreciate it very much. thank you Gilad54321 (talk) 02:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae/Archive_8&oldid=1141434641"