User talk:Vanjagenije/Archive 19

This is an archive of past discussions with Vanjagenije. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20 >

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - ... (up to 100)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law. Legobot (talk) 04:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User page help

Your user page says This editor is a Grandmaster Editor. (verify) but I do not see how I would get that to happen on my talk page. I am a mere Master Editor IV. Please tell me how, right here on your talk page.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:FlightTime/Tpw @Dthomsen8: You can find service award badges here Wikipedia:Service awards, find yours and post it on your page. If you need more help, you can ask on talk page. Hope this helps. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an idiot

On this SPI, I didn't check that the text I pasted was above that mandatory line or not... thanks for fixing that for me. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hallwang Clinic

I opened this yesterday morning UK time and you referred it to checkuser, although I'm not quite sure why because the behavioural evidence was obvious. It is now well over 24 hours since the checkuser reply came back but there has still been no action taken, although the sock-/meat-puppets have continued to make promotional edits to the article in question. Please could you take some action to stop them? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I find it very difficult to understand your close. It's not a matter of the other editors editing the same article, but they did so as their very first edits on Wikipedia, and, in the first case to whitewash the article by removing any mention in the article or in the sources of a qualified person who has criticised this clinic, and in the second case by adding promotional edits sourced to the clinic's own web site. And both of these happened soon after an editor had been blocked for promotion. Where should I go to appeal against a decision made at WP:SPI, because this was one of the most obvious cases of sock- or meat-puppetry that I've seen? Phil Bridger (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And now another obvious sock-/meat-puppet has turned up. Please either reconsider your decision or tell me how I can appeal against it. I've spent all week trying to cope with your lack of support in this matter. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to complain at WP:ANI. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

accusations against me

Hello I am being accused by several users of being a soc or another user. Much of these claims date back years. Now the reaso nwhy this is a problem is because I did not move to Canada until June of 2018, prior to that I was in th eUK. While I was in th eUK, I had been accused of being another user as well, hence why I am rathe rupset that I have to go through this all over again. Please see my talkpage and can you give me advice on what to do about these accusations? How can I go forward from here knowing that these accusations exist? I don't know where some of them come from, maybe soe explanations are in order. I'm reaching out to you and a couple others fo rhelp, I understand you are a socpuppet investigation as seen on a SPI linked in a discussion I was in on the village pump. thanks. 199.101.61.34 (talk) 11:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also you may want to do something about 2600:8800:1880:fc:5604:a6ff:fe38:4b26, this guy who not only accuses me of being a troll, but also is reverting edits (some of which are not mine) 199.101.61.34 (talk) 12:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template help

Hi Vanja,

I just tried to fix roughly in the Kneževi Vinogradi article that the Hungarian name today is Hercegszöllős, but but older forms were as well Herczegszöllős and Herczeg-Szöllős (since the article only used one of the older forms), but incidentally also after finishing the edit the following message became visible (although not anymore I was in preview naturally):

Warning: Page using Template:Infobox settlement with unknown parameter "pushpin_map_caption1" (this message is shown only in preview).

Warning: Page using Template:Infobox settlement with unknown parameter "pushpin_map1" (this message is shown only in preview).

A tried to revert myself to trace the problem, but sometimes it worked and the message disappeared, other times without any wise reason came back..I gave up...could you please help to make it diasappear? Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2019 (UTC))[reply]

@KIENGIR: That message has no connection to your edit. Simply, the {{Infobox settlement}} uses two depreciated parameters ("pushpin_map_caption1" and "pushpin_map1") and those two should be removed from the template. Vanjagenije (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Users on Other Wikis

Hi Vanjagenije,

Back in 2010, you blocked the user WikiLubber (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AWikiLubber). This user is active on Wikiquote. Do you have any idea how to get the block extended to Wikiquote? I realize you're not an admin for Wikiquote, but I was wondering if you happened to know if there is any sort of policy/procedure for blocking a user across Wikis.

Thanks! OCNative (talk) 06:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have to find a Wikiquote admin. I don't know anything about Wikiquote policies. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Undo of the List of linguistic example sentences#Japanese

Did you know what Manyogana (萬葉假名) is? All manyogana is that a japanese sentence WRITE IN HAN CHARACTERS just because there were no HIRAGANAs and KATAKANAs then, so the Japanese people then borrowed HAN CHARACTERs with their PRONOUNCIATION to write their native words and that's what KANAs come from. I may be grammarly wrong but I think you should not undo one's action especially if you are unfamiliar with their culture and you didn't even read through my edition. All of the explanation above is in the articles Man'yōgana and Kana. Regardless of all of these, thank you for undoing my edition for telling me that most people don't understand the meaning that I want to express if they are not accounted to the Han-Japanese culture.TNTErick (talk) 04:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak
Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tony on semi-Wikibreak

Hi there, left this for Tony a few hours ago [1] and then saw he's away on semi-Wikibreak. Might you be able to answer the question for me, about whether I should raise the query about an existing case on his Talk page or in the case page itself? I'm not sure if the case page is restricted to Administrators or if it's not the place for queries. My time is scarce, which is why I ask. Many thanks, Bob. -- Roberthall7 (talk) 05:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. [2] -Roberthall7 (talk) 20:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:2018 Strasbourg attack

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2018 Strasbourg attack. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zikica Jovanović Spanac.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zikica Jovanović Spanac.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Hi Vanjagenije. Just notifying you of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Bring back Daz Simpson: NPA and ASPERSIONS as a courtesy since I mentioned you by name in the thread. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Rojava

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rojava. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Vanja,

before I would turn here, I ask you maybe I miss something...my watchlist is default set to list prior changes back to 3 days...in case I select 7, or 30 (though I'd need 7 right now), only the last 250 changes are listed, regardless of the setting (though the change is visible by the date and the days parameters, but in fact the pages listed (and their number) pages remain identical (and also such tabs like "previous/next" are missing...I do something wrong or it's a technical issue? (i'd need to go back until 24 June, but it won't go before 27 June....) Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 08:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]

I have no idea how to fix that issue. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2020

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ziggy 2milli

Hey Vanja, if you have a moment, could you please do the requested move at the above case? It's been sitting a fairly long time with the clerk request. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Can you tell me what exactly do you need me to do? I read the case, but I'm still not sure I understand. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Ziggy case should be merged into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Woshiyiweizhongguoren.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Bbb23 (talk) 15:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterix and Obelix All at Sea cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterix and Obelix All at Sea cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-07.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-12.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-15.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-15.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-16.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-16.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-17.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-17.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-19.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-19.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-21.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-21.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-22.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-23.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-23.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-25.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-25.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-26.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-26.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-27.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-27.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asterixcover-28.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asterixcover-28.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunce na prozoru Album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunce na prozoru Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Magyarization article

Hi Vanja,

however slowly, but in the referred article persistent IP disruptivity is ongoing...what do you think, is pp-semi for a period viable? Thank You (KIENGIR (talk) 18:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Kingdom of Hungary

I kindly ask your attention also here, a newbie fresh account just commited the 6th (!) revert, just telling you and not reporting because we don't byte newcomers...Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 18:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Mick Mulvaney

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mick Mulvaney. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LEN & FINA

Nikako ne mogadoh da te nadjem na srpskoj wikipediji, ni ja ni ovi sa diskonta. Vanja, imam problem sa Pelmeerom i njegovim editovanjem koji se kose sa oficijalnim dokumentima FINA i LEN. Od kako si mu dao upozorenje, pre tri dana, nije editovao makar Svetski sampionat u vaterpolu, ali se sada bavi Evropskim prvenstvima, a tu ja uporno prilazem dokument koji on brise, a to je ovo^[1]. Sve je receno. Molim te, samo oko tih stvari skreni mu paznju jer, ocigledno, ja zaludno pricam.DusanSilniVujovic (talk) 13:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DusanSilniVujovic: Was that you that made anonymous edits using the 178.220.212.82 IP? Vanjagenije (talk) 13:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my fall. I see now. Sorry about that. DusanSilniVujovic (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If is that for European men's water polo championships DusanSilniVujovic (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www2.len.eu/?p=12675

Infobox Inhumans IMAX

It was never a redirect. It was mergerd per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_17#Template:Infobox_Inhumans_IMAX and was only ever used on one page. It was never agreed to be changed to a redirect after merge. Also, it was not actually merged, but just replaced with additional manual code, so even less reason for it to be a redirect. --Gonnym (talk) 15:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: I understand. What WP:Speedy deletion criteria do you want to use to delete the redirect? Vanjagenije (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes you need to WP:IAR if this specific use-case "Was created as a fork out of consensus for one article, which was later brought to TfD and by consensus changed to a merge, which wasn't really a merge, but more of 'a just use the normal template and add manually the missing fields you need', then changed to redirect but not part of the TfD result" is not present. It should really have just been moved to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell#Ready for deletion and be dealt with there, but whatever. --Gonnym (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Article

Hello Vanjagenije I just noticed you deleted my first wiki article. Its really discouraging and for you to say there wasn't a single independent reliable source with significant coverage presented is so not true. If you had taken your time to read the references provided, I noticed most of you don't considered our African news sources as reliable which is very bad. I am really disappoint and discourage from creating or editing on wiki. Kofipedia (talk) 02:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kofipedia: Yes, actually I did check every single link in the article, and there was nothing that satisfies WP:GNG. African sources are expected to meet the very same criteria as any other sources, there can't be special criteria for Africa. I am sorry for your disappointment. I am disappointed too that you have been WP:Votestacking at the deletion discussion. Such behavior is not allowed here. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Please review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Seong Il Moon. I was in the middle of composing the message outlining the evidence that connected the IP I added per your request when you closed the SPI. Do I need to file a separate investigation request? Nardog (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Humayun's Tomb

Moved to Talk:Humayun's Tomb

– Vanjagenije (talk) 07:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reversion on Double-headed eagle page

Moved to Talk:Double-headed eagle

– Vanjagenije (talk) 13:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baba Anujka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bela Crkva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Baba Anujka at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bumps & Bruises (Ugly God album)

Just to let you know that this article, which you deleted on July 23, seems to have been recreated immediately... I've no idea if it's any different to the deleted version, but it only has one source so far. Richard3120 (talk) 01:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard3120: I deleted the redirect, so that the article can be moved to the correct title. That is clearly stated in the deletion log (see here). It was then moved by Pichpich [3]. Everything is OK. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pogona species

I noticed you deleted a page, Pogona minima, as "a different species". Is there some discussion somewhere on this? cygnis insignis 01:27, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cygnis insignis: No, but the Pogona article says that Pogona minima and Pogona minor are two different species. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Free Palestine Movement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Free Palestine Movement. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Baba Anujka

Hello! Your submission of Baba Anujka at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:2019 El Paso shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 El Paso shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Rus

Hi Vanja,

an IP is making tendentious reverts, disregarding the talk page any other warnings (already done 4 reverts). Could you handle it please? Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks, unfortunately the IP reverted you again...([4])(KIENGIR (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Baba Anujka

Hello! Your submission of Baba Anujka at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please return when you get the chance; there has been a reply to your most recent comment that needs addressing. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky

This has been completely fucked up by a non-SPI editor requesting a histmerge that was in the wrong direction. Anthony Appleyard complied and did the merge. I believe the history of the case is now in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHickey. Can you please fix it? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: I was just looking at that case as you wrote this, and wondering what happened. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije: Thanks for telling me. I see that you have moved the history-merged page to the right place Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI mention

Hi Vanja,

I mentioned you in the ANI in a case, where a user continously accused of some misconduct, it went so far of a basic interpretation of a WP rule have not been succeeded at least five times if not more, I felt no choice to ping you in....but meanhwile an other admin already informed the user that I had right. I just notify you because if anyone is mentioned in the ANI, it is an obligation. Thank You for your time.(KIENGIR (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Vanjagenije/Archive 19,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of protected natural resources in Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tutin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Baba Anujka

On 19 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baba Anujka, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Serbian poisoner Baba Anujka (pictured), aged over 90 at the time of her trial, was sentenced to 15 years' hard labor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baba Anujka. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Baba Anujka), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Right-wing politics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Right-wing politics. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NEED SUPPORT: Draft Josip Zovko

Hello Vanjagenije, the German administrator de:benutzer:Aspiriniks gave me the hint to contact you. I wrote the article Josip Zovko in German and Croatian. I have translated these in English. I uploaded this to Wikipedia EN.

The problem is probably that the English Wikipedia has no administrator who speaks the Serbo-Croat language. I have translated all references to English as requested. For the article I have taken reputable Croatian reports from HRT (Hrvatska Radiotelevizija), Slobodna Dalmatia, Vecernji List, Novi List, etc. In addition, I have named the author by name. These are therefore reputable third pages that report objectively about the artist. I do not want to profile myself personally in this report. This would not be possible with such a report. This is about the artist Josip Zovko who died on April 03, 2019 by a traffic accident in Bosnia. The attached and uploaded images are all licensed and uploaded and shared with Wikipedia Commons. Can you confirm that the article is objective and authentic? The German administrator de:benutzer:Aspiriniks can confirm this, because he had checked the pages on the German Wikipedia page and released. You are welcome to contact the German administrator. I hope you can help me! Moj Galeb (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Moj Galeb: As I can see, you forgot to re-submit the draft for new review. Anyway, I accepted the draft since the subject is obviously notable. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Vanjagenije/Archive 19,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Ivanovic and International relations

Hi Vanjagenije

I was adding a link to Portal:International relations to articles on ambassadors, and had forgotten that it included Category:Goodwill ambassador programmes and its subcats, including Category:UNICEF Goodwill Ambassadors. So they got included in my AWB run, including Ana Ivanovic, who is in Category:UNICEF Goodwill Ambassadors, during which I was concentrating onscrutinising the styntactical accuracy rather than reviewing the nature of each article.

Reviewing that example, it seems to me to be a bit of a tossup as to whether that portal link was appropriate. I can see good arguments both ways, and in the case of a marginal categorisation I would default toward a "no", but with links I default a little toward a yes. I don't object to your revert[5] since you evidently come down on the "no" side of a marginal choice, which is fair enough. But I think here is merit in it, so I don't feel inclined to go and revert any of the others.

Hope that clarifies what happened. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Please take a look - Ivan Gundulić and Vlaho Bukovac. Am I the one who is wrong here / not understanding MOS: Lead all too well? Sadko (talk) 00:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are the one who is wrong, Gundulic is a Croatian poet and Bukovac is a Croatian painter, a reliable source has been put . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.251.158.212 (talk) 07:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Vanjagenije/Archive 19,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Freedom and Direct Democracy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Freedom and Direct Democracy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much

Thank you so much for un blocking me . I promise i will read everything and Ask questions n use my sandbox and do everything in my power to get it right next time. I was literally so sad about being blocked that i havent signed in since i was blocked. I will definately be awesome next time. Thank you again. :) Jamie.discala (talk) 19:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Submitra

See Special:Diff/921731618 -- RoySmith (talk) 15:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Self-coup

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Self-coup. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed

Admin's attention needed at Serbs of Croatia. ty, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 20:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hi,

Will you please be so kind to help to resolve dispute at Talk:June 1941 uprising in eastern Herzegovina about possible POV issue (link).

I am concerned that the text of article presents Ustaše genocidal actions against Serbs as Ustaše retaliation against attempts of the Serbs of eastern Herzegovina to defend themselves,... puting a blame on Serbs for ...poor choice that gave the Ustaše an excuse to take radical action.... The text of the article justifies Ustaše genocidal activities against Serbs with Serb ...links to the inter-war Chetnik Association,...... and their ...idea of Greater Serbia,.......

I already asked help from admin who is most active on WP Croatia, so I ask you as admin who is most active admin in articles within the scope of WP Serbia to help. Thank you--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Antal

Hi, would you mind removing or reducing the protection of the redirect Antal? I was thinking of creating a dab page at this title, as none of the incoming links appear to be meant for the current target. Pinging also Yamaguchi先生, who had applied protection earlier. – Uanfala (talk) 01:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Constitution of Japan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constitution of Japan. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for page protection

I saw that you blocked Obsuser for a week for edit warring on the article on Zdravko Čolić, and changed the protection level on it. Well the same thing is happening over the article on Maya Berović, only in that case Obsuser's opponents are IP editors who have exactly the same POV as Obsuser's opponent on Zdravko Čolić. Please could you consider applying partial protection to the article on Maya Berović, so that they have to log in as auto-confirmed users. Toddy1 (talk) 19:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping. Toddy1 (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SPI merges

It looks like I've screwed up on SPI merges (mixing them up with moves). Bbb23 has volunteered you to help out. This search is my first cut at locating those which may need your admin tools to fix. Sorry for the trouble. Cabayi (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not as bad as the 40 results in that query implied. I think there's just 3 cases where the mop may be needed:

Again, sorry for the trouble. Cabayi (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Vanjagenije, it's my moves as well as my merges that were wrong. With a slightly different search and scraping my browser's edit summary suggestions starting with "case moved from/to", I think this is a full and complete list of my bad moves, with each move's evidence grouped together.

Surjeetsing -> Davidfarly

Case moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Davidfarly Special:Permalink/916173639