User:LuK3/dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- Ioh'etwnj (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Loraine Blanda (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2A02:6B6F:FBF1:BB00:82C:7E32:79E5:B0EE (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Repeated deletion of whole section of referenced content - see /64 range for the other edits. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Which hadn't been done. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 136.34.40.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Nothere, disruptive POV pushing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. And frankly there is not enough there for a block. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Haala Humayun Qureshi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Gotitbro (talk) 21:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Level I. This is rather dated. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Stale report. User has not edited in 2 weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 39.45.99.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. Gotitbro (talk) 21:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 159.196.169.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Everything this user has done has been reverted - looks like a vandalism-only account. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Problem
[edit]Help me! SleepyHollowGuy1999 and Chelsea, Alison, Candy, and Veronica why is it not allowed at all Fozzie Bear?
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 2 |
| Other candidates | 10 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 20 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Ausernamea (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Gary4rfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Wkubetcom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. They haven't been able to do anything quite yet, but watch out: They HARD triggered the edit filters for self-promotion. Just a heads up. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 23:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 2406:3400:60D:B1E0:6C36:336A:BFD6:40F6/64 persistently edit warring to change the text to be contrary to what the sources say. This IP has already been blocked under this IP but continues to edit on the rest of their /64 (all the same person). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- ETA: I see that their block was, in fact, temporary and expired. But it remains the same disruptive user. Note, for instance, this previous attempt to insert this with deceptive edsum [1]. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2406:3400:60D:B1E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by IPs ongoing for months (ever since 1 year semi protection expired). Since the page is just a list of capitals, no regular edits are foreseen here. Requesting indefinite/ long term semi protection against such IP edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequently targetted page subject to sanctioned WP:CASTE disruption; as the page history would denote, unlikely to subside. Gotitbro (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: His page is already protected but may need another protection. Allan Lichtman has contined to push for updates to his own page, including on YouTube interviews last night, in contravention of Wikipedia conflict of interest rules and the consensus of the page's editors regarding his predictive record. Caraturane (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to add: this is a request for an extension of the protection or whatever you feel is best given the situation. Ever since protection went up, the talk page has been consistent in its view as to his predictive record, as has the related The Keys to the White House talk page. There has not been widespread disagreement about what the pages should say, but he has continued to agitate for the edits on the side for most of the last month (including on his YouTube channel) and there is concern the pages will get edit spammed with edits, against the talk page consensus, once again. Caraturane (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet IP of Blaxstocatamazon is back and making similar legal threats see Blaxstocatamazon's contributions[2]. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 49.36.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: User:Qalandar303 was banned indefinitely less than two years ago (ANI link). Several IPs have been making similar edits to the same page over the last five days, with the same tone of voice on the talk page (e.g. You have been reverted, and will continue to be so indefinitely. If you continue to misbehave, brow-beat and bully, rights are reserved to take furthermore action.
).
Please semi-protect for a month. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of personal attacks on my talk-page by different IPs in the last 10 days. Jingiby (talk) 16:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 185.96.163.21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. for two weeks Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Has been a target before, and with my most recent edits (thoroughly researched, and publicly posted before I made them), I'm anticipating a very high probability of further shenanigans. ShinyAlbatross (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. But I will put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous IP vandalism Sparkbean (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 129.205.240.79 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: addition of poor quality content that conflicts with information that is already in this article. D4R1U5 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really seeing anything the editors aren't handling, and also I am hesitant to casually protect an article at AfD as either a) it will deleted and not be an issue, or b) it might keep editors who could add material that saves it from deletion from doing so. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This article has been vandalized on several occasions over the last couple of weeks, as a result it has been nominated for protection. Steve.A.Dore.4 (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism luckymustard (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High frequency of IP vandalism within the past week. Mellamelina (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – continuous WP:BLP violations by IP users. NitinMlk (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP targeting Maleschreiber (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive (and tiresome and unimaginative) editing, mostly to the short description. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive (and tiresome and unimaginative) editing, mostly to the short description. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talk • edits) 22:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talk • edits) 22:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article already has "Consensus Required" restriction on it, and multiple XC editors are reverting in violation of established consensus on the talk page (see Talk:Zionism#Revert for a previous round where, at the bottom of the thread, the established consensus about one line was re-affirmed), likely in response to recent high-profile posts on X (e.g., this post by Brianna Wu, this post by Hen Mazzig). (There is also non-XC disruption on the talk page.) Suggest short-term (few days or a week) full protection of the article, and ECP of the talk page, to force XC editors to go to the talk page to suggest changes in accordance with the Consensus Required restriction. Note the article is already ECP'd and the talk page is not protected; I'm suggesting boosting the article to full and the talk page to ECP. TIA, Levivich (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced additions by IP editors. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: This redirect is fully protected because of an argument about whether it should be its own article. This dispute was settled over nine years ago, so this page's current level of protection is unnecessary. Cyrobyte (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Spartaz: Protecting admin, back in the day. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The imposition of a redirect was endorsed at DRV and the advice was to allow a discussion before considering any changes to the level of protection. I guess my question is why do you want to remove the protection? Spartaz Humbug! 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Reason: Arbitrarian editions by IP users.
I think semi-protection (for only auto-user cofirmed) could work. Thank you all. Rey1996ss (talk) 18:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done because there is nothing to do. The page is not protected, and this is not an edit request. If this is a request to protect, you put it on the wrong subpage, and also we don't protect to block one side of a content dispute. Furthermore, you have failed to engage in any talk page discussion whatsoever. You have received this answer on User talk:Anachronist already. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 19 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 13 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Account creator
[edit]- TMorata (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
On Sept 21st I will be offering a training to beginner editors during the World Congress of Audiology in Paris We will introduce participants to Global Audiology. I anticipate I will need to allow the creation of some new accounts at the same time, so I ask for this user right from Sept 21 to 23rd. I already hold this permission with both Portuguese and testwiki. Thank you TMorata (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Done until September 25th. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done, revoked, and replaced with +eventcoordinator.@Elli, this right shouldn't be granted to those running events. The eventcoordinator group is much better suited as it excludes some more sensitive rights like override-antispoof and tboverride-account, but also grants the ability to mark users as confirmed if necessary. stwalkerster (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Stwalkerster: my apologies; you're totally right. I don't know how I missed that here; I'd granted eventcoordinator before. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a problem, I've swapped everything over now so no harm done! :) stwalkerster (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Stwalkerster: my apologies; you're totally right. I don't know how I missed that here; I'd granted eventcoordinator before. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission account creator. — MusikBot talk 21:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any problems with your creations but as the rate is relatively low (last 25 takes us back to 2018), there will be minimal benefit to NPP in autopatrolling them. Not done for now, but thank you for thinking of the backlog. – Joe (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. SerChevalerie (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jebiguess (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Roastedbeanz1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Has created 380 articles, of which only 4 have been deleted. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done A decent chunk of page creations are disambiguation pages but there are enough article creations to grant this. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Intruder007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to introduce an exceptional editor and author with a amazing track record in editing and article creation. Created 182 articles, none of which have been deleted, with the majority focusing on BLPs. Nice editor, and it’s clear that he is one of the editors for whom this user right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- 98Tigerius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mischellemougly (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- TryAgainSooner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I recently applied for rollback and withdrew my request after realizing that I was below the required 200 main space edit count. Now, I have 206 main space edits (mostly anti-vandalism work) as well as a month of experience. I would like access to rollback in order to use tools like Huggle and Anti-Vandal to revert vandalism more quickly. During my very first efforts to revert vandalism, I did fail to warn some users as I did not have access to RedWarn or Twinkle and had not yet read the related policies. Shortly after that, I read WP:VANDAL. Now, I believe I have since built a strong track record of warning the user every time I revert their edits and reverting only when appropriate. Thanks! TryAgainSooner (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 15:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done -Fastily 22:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a strongly active and, I believe, positive contributor to Wikipedia for over 4 months now, and have throughly enjoyed my time editing and undoing vandalism/unconstructive edits whenever I see them. I have not reverted a *ton* of vandalism, but I do believe that I have at least demonstrated by ability to discern and do so, as well as doing my best as of recently to notify users when I revert their edits. Moreover, I commit to using this right fairly, constructively, and honestly if given it. Thanks Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 02:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Understood Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also I’m sure you noticed but I am also requesting the Pending Changes Reviewer permission, I think that would significantly help me in patrolling / doing anti vandalism as well. Since you are an admin, could you look into that request of mine? I would appreciate it Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- ClaudineChionh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been cleaning up vandalism mostly with the help of Twinkle. I was granted temporary rollback rights in 2021 but then life got busy and I didn't seek an extension. I now have more time to dedicate to counter-vandalism efforts again. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 13:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- MP1999 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I'm requesting for permissions because I know it will save a lot of time my time to undo problematic edits. I have read the guidelines for how and when to use rollback so yes am ready. Cheers
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for the exact same reason I declined your previous request -Fastily 19:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tesleemah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello!
I have been guiding new users against Vandalism for a while now and this is done mostly offline.however,recently my passion for more onwiki contribution grew and I signed up as a host on Wikipedia Teahouse where I have been guiding new editors, I will like to request the right to roll back edit in order to do more of onwiki tasks and ease the work of admins. Tesleemah (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 19:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links