User:TFOWR/Dashboard
| TFOWR · talkpage · dashboard · sandbox · monobook.js · monobook.css · sub-pages | WP:AIV · WP:RFPP · WP:SPI · WP:AN · WP:ANI |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 156.47.145.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1307 (LTA 1307, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 95.214.210.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Not Mid Atlantic Baby. PhilKnight (talk) 04:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Odosunny (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Again, not Mid Atlantic Baby. PhilKnight (talk) 10:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- ReggieMens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 27.96.194.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 294 (Personal attacks, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 138.88.145.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism past final warning; persistent and disruptive removal of content in television show articles. User has been blocked twice already. snapsnap (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 120.29.88.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistently unreferenced edits after 4 usertalk page warnings. No communication. Hotwiki (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 90.241.143.101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Goyard (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 89.184.150.181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) See filter log. Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40D1:2028:C40:8000:0:0:0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Mazhabi Sikh: vandalism after final warning. Repeated vandalism and pov removal of content. R0paire-wiki (talk) 07:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2A00:5400:E050:1C4E:4D7C:1C6A:ED6A:84C0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) vandalism-only IP vandalising in spite of warnings ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 212.14.198.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA MAB. Knitsey (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 1 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 4 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 5 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 96 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 19 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- LizlFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Profagama (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "fag" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- InTheFamily3 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Zalika Consulting Africa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dirty Kong (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- SpaceMouseIndustries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WrittenInPublic (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Undisputed Ruined King (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "ruin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reellifestudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Regionalrelations (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Homogenics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "homo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reddituser12422442 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Ted.crap (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Knitsey (talk) 23:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm having second thoughts about this one. Crap isn't a swear word in the US? Knitsey (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Knitsey, "crap" is mildly vulgar, and its primary meaning is "low quality" although it also means "feces". I wouldn't call it a swear word. Cullen328 (talk) 01:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- My mum begs to differ lol. No, thats fair enough. Please delete this if appropriate. Knitsey (talk) 01:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- If only, Knitsey, your mum, who I am sure is a wonderful person, had pondered the borderline UAA cases as deeply as us Wikipedia nerds have. Tell her about the Teahouse and let her know that an old man in California says "hi". Cullen328 (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Worth reporting but agree that it's not a UAA. However thus us a good opportunity to point out the existence of our article on Thomas Crapper. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- My mum begs to differ lol. No, thats fair enough. Please delete this if appropriate. Knitsey (talk) 01:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Officeexam (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spammy sandbox. Wikishovel (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Contractuo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Company name, created promotional draft at Draft:Contractuo. bonadea contributions talk 10:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- CentreforArmyLeadership (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username implies promotional intent / shared use. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Rydot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 04:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: this is a Old Archived talk page. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 09:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: this is a Old Archived talk page. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 09:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion edit warring by User:Bigboss19923. Belbury (talk) 09:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: 3 different IPs since yesterday trying to change a page about a Hungarian surname into a page about a Jat tribe, despite the page not listing anyone from that tribe. Fram (talk) 10:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per WP:GSCASTE, disruptive editing and vandalism by socks and IPs. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:ARBPIA protection needed. Two reversions have already occurred and the only topics currently on the page relate to PIA. Standard EC protection is being requested, given reversions have occurred now. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 11:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP-vandalism Lklundin (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 23 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 09:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Hansmuller (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
A good editor and content creator, they have created a total of 133 articles. One was deleted via G14 in 2022, and another was deleted via A3 back in 2014. Since then, they have created many BLPs and other topic articles, none of which have been deleted. I think they are good to go. GrabUp - Talk 16:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done. I think it's been some ten years User:Hansmuller, since we interacted on nl:Lise Meitner. It's nice to see you here. I see you've been blocked indefinitely in the Dutch Wikipedia for various conflicts in Wikipedia space unrelated to article content, but this did not impact my decision.- I've checked ~10 creations and have noted & tagged one major issue (an uncited short para in a BLP), and a few minor ones (formatting, which I've corrected). You tend to WP:OVERCITE (having 4-5 citations after a paragraph, for instance in Sol de Carvalho), which makes it more difficult to connect sources to specific content. It might be better to put additional citations in a Further reading section if there is unused information in them. I'm also a bit concerned with the Car speed and energy consumption AfD, which resulted in a redirect. Created end of December, it shows essay and textbook tendencies which I don't expect in articles from autopatrolled editors.
- Overall, feel free to nominate yourself when you've created another 8-12 clean articles, as we're not far from the threshold. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- GnocchiFan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including 
seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- UndercoverClassicist (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
has created 36 articles, of which over 60 percent (!) are B-class or higher. This was requested and (rightfully) turned down last year, but they have created many more articles and there's no need to patrol. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 05:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Suslindisambiguator (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to introduce another editor with a strong history of editing and article creation. They have created 2,114 articles, including 2 GAs. Their creations include BLPs, which are essential for obtaining the AP flag. Only one of their articles was deleted in 2023 via AfD, and others are G6. Since then, no articles have been deleted. I believe it would be beneficial to grant them this right to help reduce the NPP backlog. GrabUp - Talk 13:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- I found out after nominating that they had previously been granted AP by MusikAnimal, but it was later revoked in 2022 by Primefac due to copyright violations. I am not withdrawing the nomination, as it was two years ago, and the issue may have been resolved, so let’s see if they can be trusted now. GrabUp - Talk 13:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-admin comment, but I'm bored) I spot checked their most recent creation,Anthony Michael Hillas, made after this request. Compared to the source [1]
Hillas returned to the University of Leeds in 1959 as a lecturer and made it understood that he refused to be assigned duties similar to those he performed at Harwell
He returned to Leeds in 1959 as a lecturer making it understood that he would not work on the embryonic air-shower experiment
His Monte Carlo computer program, MOCCA, for high-energy air shower studies, was used extensively in the design of the Pierre Auger Observatory.
His final Monte Carlo program for high-energy shower studies, known as MOCCA, was used extensively in the design of what became the Pierre Auger Observatory.
He collected rocks, pebbles, and fossils and keenly followed radio and television programs on geology.
He collected rocks, pebbles and fossils and avidly followed radio and TV programs dealing with geology.
- Spotchecking more, like Thomas Wallace (horticulturalist) to [2], reveals similar issues
After sufficient recovery from his wounds, Wallace was assigned to the Anti-Gas Department of the Royal Engineers
When he had recovered sufficiently from his wounds Wallace, was seconded to the Royal Engineers for service in the Anti-Gas Department.
When the land to be sloughed up had a soil type which might prove deficient in some minerals, Wallace recommended the use of indicator plots.
(Fun with thesauruses)When land was to be broken on a soil type which might prove deficient, he recommended the use of indicator plots.
- NPP can't deal with WP:CLOP (or anything but Earwig readable copyvio) and all these articles have been sailing through, however. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done Thank you for having been bored, GreenLipstickLesbian. That was a productive piece of work. There's no way that Suslindisambiguator should be autopatrolled. Schwede66 08:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Benmite (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- M7md AAAA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Editing semi-protected pages M7md AAAA (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- 98Tigerius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- GhostInTheMachine (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- KylieTastic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, as part of working at AfC I come across submissions on editors main userpage or sandbox that need to be cleanly moved to draft (i.e. without leaving a redirect). I stopped moving such submissions years ago as if the editor starts another article I was then the creator rather the actual creator which never seemed right to me. It would also be useful for when new editors create/move drafts to the Wikipedia or Template namespaces either in error or attempting to promote/spam. KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jlwoodwa (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I frequently make/request moves – usually either making titles WP:CONCISE, or draftifying/fixing typos in titles as part of WP:NPP. I would like to be able to handle more of these myself, including WP:R2 suppression, but especially WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA pageswaps. These usually require updating the categories afterward, which will be much easier if I'm doing the pageswap myself, rather than remembering to come back once my request at WP:RM/T is carried out. Speaking of which, I've really appreciated WP:RM/T, and if I'm granted the pagemover right I intend to "give back" by handling requests there. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mischellemougly (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: user blocked. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Rofraja (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been reviewing and fixing bare URLs for the past year and I would like to try something different. I'd like to get reviewer rights to be able to start reviewing from a different angle. Rofraja (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cremastra (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm an experienced user, and would like to help out at pending changes. I know the backlog is small, but I see no reason why I can't spend a bit of time to make it smaller. I have experience in anti-vandalism, and already some *limited* experience reviewing changes at Wikibooks, where I hold the reviewer right (although I am not super active there). Cremastra (talk) 16:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- LR.127 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
While I haven't been editing for very long (only a few months), I have rollback rights and frequently revert vandalism. I also review Redirects for Creation, which is under pending changes protection. I've read the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. LR.127 (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cysquatch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now and frequently revert vandalism. However, I often come across constructive edits that I can't do much about. For this reason, I would like to have the pending changes reviewer tool to mark these edits as reviewed and broadly acceptable for public view , allowing me to take on new tasks. Cysquatch (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Bunnypranav (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like access to rollback for more efficiently combating vandalism. I have gained experience in patrolling RecentChanges. I also make sure to always warn (and welcome new users) after reverting their edits on their talk page. I declare that I have read through all the policies regarding vandalism. Bunnypranav (talk) 11:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism a few days ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 07:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the positive advice. In all of my reverts till now I have always left a warning without fail. Bunnypranav (talk) 07:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- TyphoonAmpil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello i'm TyphoonAmpil. i Revert Vandalism on August. i Patrolling Recent Changes, Very High track record over 150 reverts. i use Anti-Vandal. too slow WP:UV and WP:TW too fast WP:AntiVandal. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 01:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Matrix (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made quite a few edit requests in the Template talk namespace, as well as edits directly in the template namespace. I always test my changes in the sandbox before making edits directly. I am also a Commons admin and have made lots of technical changes in templates there as well. I am currently focussing on turning templates to be dark mode compatible, and many templates and editnotices are template protected. Therefore I request template editor so it can be more easy to implement dark mode compatibility into templates. Thank you, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 2)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~4600)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 174)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
- (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: >3)
- (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: >5)
- Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Matrix, do you see this as a relatively short-term, get-all-dark-mode-sorted type of situation, or do you see yourself needing this for other applications? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, more of the former. I would be happy with having this right for 3 months or so. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 17:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, more of the former. I would be happy with having this right for 3 months or so. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
- Matrix, do you see this as a relatively short-term, get-all-dark-mode-sorted type of situation, or do you see yourself needing this for other applications? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
- Done for the rest of the year. Primefac (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links