User talk:Luk/Archives/14

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

	Archives
2006	Previous - October - November - December
2007	January - February - March - April - May - June - July
	August - September - October - November - December
2008	January - February - March - April - May - June - July
	August - September - October - November- December
2009	January - February - March - April - May - June - July
	August - September - October - November - December
2010	messages from 2010
2011	messages from 2011
2012	messages from 2012
2013	messages from 2013–2017
2018	messages from 2018
2019	messages from 2019
2020	messages from 2020
2021	messages from 2021
Conversations are archived manually

This Archive Page goes from 1/10/2007 to 31/10/2007 (dd/mm/yyyy)

Previous conversations prior to 1 October 2007 (UTC) are archived there.

tnx

Thanks for message (if it wasn't automated)

I have a specific question. on the history of a link it gives a number i.e. -1 or +54 etc.. is that how many times the page has been refreshed for me personally, since the last login?

i also made minor changes to a contribution, but find there is a backlog of previous versions. Is it impossible to remove a previous post? Regards HC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haudcivitas (talk • contribs) 06:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 08:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

please don't delete raskafarian

Hey buddy, please don't delete my article about raskafarian. please.. People don't write a lot about us filipinos, please, i guess it's reasonable that we write our own stories. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edzofcit (talk • contribs) 06:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Copying it to the talk page of the article. -- lucasbfr ^talk (using User:Lucasbfr2) 08:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your delete of User:ClueBot/Sandbox

Thanks for deleting it, but the reason should have quoted CSD U1, not CSD G10:

06:37, 1 October 2007 Lucasbfr (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:ClueBot/Sandbox" ‎ (CSD G10: Attack Page)

That IP who put that there was me testing ClueBot's rules. Thanks for deleting it though :) -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 07:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 08:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

You Opinion: Already something that shouldn't be here?

Hi, I was looking around and noticed that there are a few pages which can be deemed episode guides (Sexual Harassment Panda). Seeing as in WP:NOT it states that Wikipedia is not a directory, which is basically in essence what an episode guide is, do you think it meets criteria for prod? --Amaraiel 14:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 14:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Alizée Search

Hi Lucasbfr. I was just looking into Alizée Search. It had been prodded in May, and that had been contested by the article creator. I went to look at the history when you deleted it. The prod was overdue, so you were right to delete it. It looks like there is little reason for the article to remain, however I was curious to look into the history to see what had gone on in the past to see if there was anything that could be salvaged and maybe merged in to the Alizée article. Would you undelete it for half an hour to let me have a look. I'll let you know when I've finished. Regards SilkTork *SilkyTalk 14:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 14:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll take a look. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 14:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Done. Not much to save. I merged the key sentence into Alizée. Thanks for your help! Regards SilkTork *SilkyTalk 14:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Declining Unblocks

LOL! What do people expect when they cop that kind of attitude while they're asking for an accommodation? That's pretty much my standard response. See also User talk:70.113.75.26. And we could definitely use you back at WP:SCV. CSB is more sensitive than Wherebot ever was, and it barely reports any false positives, so there's a much higher volume. And it's pretty much just been me and User:Madman the past few days. See ya' around! -- But|seriously|folks 07:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous users

Pas merde, genius. I was giving him a heads up because, despite understanding that it is the only way you have to communicate with anonymous users, it's annoying to have warning and such pop up when one is innocently trying to do a project with one's kids, you condescending little French prick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.182.92.124 (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 14:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Tweety21

you blocked my account for "legal threat", this threat was not against wikipedia but user Precious Roy who I feel was defaming me by claiming I was a PR firm, this is completly false! how do I formally retract my "legal threat" and also dispite being block for legal threat, Precious Roy put on my page that it was due to "sock puppetry" this was false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.240.7.14 (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Our no legal threats policy also applies against other users. -- lucasbfr ^talk 18:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

MuggleNet.com's What Will Happen in Harry Potter 7

Thanks very much for pointing me in the direction of the "Conflict of Interest" information, but it isn't relevant in this case. I haven't got a conflict of interest, I'm just using the fact that I know more about the writing of this book than the writers of the article, in order to make the information on Wikipedia more accurate. The fact that I know more about the writing of the book because I wrote it isn't really the issue.

A conflict of interest only arises if I'm trying to suppress the truth or promote falsehood for my own gain. This isn't the case here: I'm simply correcting inaccuracies on a subject I know the most about.

Thanks for your time though. Bobby Skank 13:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

unblock

this page was supposed to be unblocked. as user tweety21 was unlblocked yesterday. Can you help with this-privacy issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

blocked...

I dont understand the page is blocked... cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

unblock

re:privacy issues can you advise how to get my personal info off of this screen. Sorry I have just had enough problems with weirdos! 142.205.212.203 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

thanks!

I just didnt wish to have this as an annoyance to those who did not do anything wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 15:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

:O)

cool, Im too wiki naive to be purposly disruptive, but boy was my first vote confusing! didnt know how to strike out "keep" to "strong keep" I have learned since then!

Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Bad report

Sorry about that, it was a mistake. I saw all the warning's from earlier months and forgot to check the date. When I realized my mistake I removed the report. -Icewedge 19:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Deleted - Travis Bradford

Thanks for deleting Travis Bradford, via the Afd (Oct 6) page. Please could you get rid of the linked article I nominated with it, too ? ie Prometheus Institute for Sustainable Development. Ta. thisisace 23:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

moves article Erwin Carlé

Thanks; Question Could you link it to the German page where it is under :

Erwin Rosen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeva3eo (talk • contribs) 23:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Done -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

User:Danadearmond

Hey Lucas, I just wanted to let you know that we've been contacted by User:Danadearmond who you username blocked. She sent me a copy of her drivers license and some other information which seems to check out, so I'm going to go ahead and unblock her. There seems to be some problems with her bio which she's been trying to correct, mainly she's concerned that the website which we have had listed is not really her website and is owned by some guy who took pictures of her when she was first starting out and I guess is now trying to make money selling pictures of her. Anyway, just wanted to let you know. Cheers, Sarah 04:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 06:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

because of your bitch ass....

there isn't an entry in WikiPedia for the term 'faceosphere'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.244.239.176 (talk) 08:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I am so sad that I fear I might not be able to sleep tonight. I see your digg group was a complete success]. -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

You are too dumb to realize what a loser you are, but here's the link to Google's search results for the term "faceosphere" (all 896 results are here!): http://www.google.com/search?q=faceosphere&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.244.50.238 (talk) 07:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

My, my... you've been a busy little spammer haven't you?--Isotope23 ^talk 14:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I turn around, and whoops, UrbanDictionary.com includes a definition for 'faceosphere': http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=faceosphere —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.244.28.217 (talk) 09:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that is a real achievement given their strenuous approval process. You should see some of the drek I've had published there.--Isotope23 ^talk 13:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

How strange. That must be Spontaneous Generation, busy little bee. -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

why was the Webopedia definition for faceosphere deleted? http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/f/faceosphere.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.244.80.96 (talk) 06:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

A loosely used slang term... Wow, I didn't think you'd hand me the bullets. This is the last time I am replying to you, please read Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms and Wikipedia:Notability. Seriously, you should perhaps find a new hobby, and stop trying to use Wikipedia as a vehicle for advertising. Jeez... -- lucasbfr ^talk 08:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

halo 3

somebody is vandalizing halo 3 and making it lead to elephants

Sound like it got reverted yet. :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 08:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32

Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/09/episode-32-trust-me/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 08:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Help please

This may be a mistake on my part, but back in what I believe was July I was blocked indefinitely for vandalism by you. I tried using another account to edit properly until I noticed that the IP address was blocked. From there that page was blocked for multiple accounts. Since the IP address was unblocked I have done the work that I know I enjoy to do and more. I was curious on if I could get one of the pages unblocked for use or will I get blocked for another account in use. I don't know, but I hope I can. When using my first account I did not know how serious people were for this site. Now I do and I'm actually hoping to one day become an administrator myself. Thanks. --Apologies2all 18:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 08:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I was blocked as A31lover by you and soon after by Stephen as Siolent323. Stephen reviewed a request to be unblocked by me as Siolent323 which was exactly the same as the one I used as A31lover. I don't care much for the Siolent323 account, but I have been known as a31lover for some great time and I hate not being able to use the name. To let you know ahead of the check; one user warned me not to misuse tags on images and I took it as a joke. (As if there weren't any consequences) Well, I replied with nothing but insults towards him and minutes later I was blocked. Again, I hope from my history on this account may change things. By the way.... that is why I named myself "Apologies2all"; to apologize to all that take Wikipedia seriously. --Apologies2all 01:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 12:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I hope this is good enough to confirmation. I'll be sure to redirect the pages as soon as possible.--A31lover 13:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Toothiness

My entry was not "humerous" per se. It is undenyable that the two words are partial homophones, at least in UK English. The methods of used-car salesmen and TV evangelists do appeal to unsubstantiated emotive appeal and not to verifiable evidence.

The term "truthiness" was reintroduced by a satirist, which is a form of comedian. So possibly this word is fair game anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.148.117 (talk) 10:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Mona Lisa twirls

The Mona Lisa image is a good addition I agree, but it was created by User:EditorInTheRye. Can't take credit for it. Cheers. Oblomow 17:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

User talk:89.243.222.7

Thanks for removing that. Next time though I think I might prefer having an admin deny the unblock (based on an obvious lack of remorse) and then maybe protect the page if the user continues to abuse unblock. That way, it's at least been thought about. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 08:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue

Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected User:Lucasbfr/Easy db because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs 00:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 08:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Roitr sockpuppet

Need some help dealing with a possible Roitr sockpuppet Skafult who continuously reverts redirects towards redundant and erroneous articles... Aldis90 22:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry you'll have to go to to WP:ANI, I can't deal with it at this time. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

The user is already blocked, but I've deleted the pages. Thanks. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

IP repeated blocks

I use software that does not broadcast my IP to any specific region. Nyms. Hope that helps lower eyebrows. Arcana imperii Ascendo tuum 21:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Review!

Dear Lucasbfr,
Thank you for your participation in providing me with a critique in my recent editor's review, archived here. I read and take each person's comments very seriously, whether or not the content is critical or praiseworthy. I look forward to working with you in future Wikipedia projects.
-- Miranda

Erm... np but I am not Dihydrogen Monoxide ^^ -- lucasbfr ^talk 01:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Hahahahaha...sorry, being ctrl+v lazy. It's changed now. Miranda 04:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Re:Talk:Web 4.0

That's fine with me. -- John Reaves 01:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

WTF is Going On

Has no place in a public encylopedia that my kids use. It is unnecessary garbage and yet another example of just how misguided some at Wikipedia are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.247.232.12 (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

LOL! E. Sn0 =31337= 05:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Father Vernard Poslusney

How is this article inappropriate? Are you a child? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Example555 (talk • contribs)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)