Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Perm)

    Requests for permissions

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 12:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add requestview requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add requestview requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add requestview requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add requestview requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add requestview requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add requestview requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add requestview requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add requestview requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add requestview requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add requestview requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add requestview requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add requestview requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add requestview requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Removal of permissions

    If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

    This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight flags are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Any editor may comment on requests for permission.

    Administrators

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator


    Autopatrolled

    User:Xegma

    Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:C1K98V

    Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Roastedbeanz1

    I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)

     Not done, sorry. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wacotron looks like it's heading for deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtaxation of the United States was not that long ago. – Joe (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Horse Eye's Back

    Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle (talkcontribs) 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You don't see an issue with the NPP is a paramilitary organization comment then? – Joe (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser


    User:Swiss512

    Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights :

    I would like to have the AutoWikiBrowser/JavaScript Wiki Browser to make edits faster to fix redirects for the correct names of railway stations and also to make faster edits for updating adjacent stations due to the renaming of some railway services in Switzerland. Swiss512 (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Per WP:NOTBROKEN this is not a good use of AWB. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I want to cancel my request. Thanks Swiss512 (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Marking  Request withdrawn for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SimplyLouis27

    I would like to have autowikibrowser permissions to improve Wikipedia by fixing spelling mistakes and other similar miscellaneous edits. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Primefac (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Zhing'za zï Ïnin‬

    I want to use AWB to replace raster graphics with vector graphics. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 19:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Wiiformii

    Hello, I am requesting AWB rights to fix spelling mistakes, more specifically names without accents, such as Raul Castro (Supposed to be spelt Raúl Castro) as seen in these pages Raul Castro and I often copy edit random pages and AWB would make these accent fixes and copy editing small grammar mistakes easier and more efficient, Wiiformii (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Majash2020

    I've previously had rights to AWB, however I had them removed due to being inactive on Wikipedia. I'd like to have these rights applied again to complete edits on album articles.--Majash2020 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) Majash2020 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([1]). MusikBot talk 01:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done. Primefac (talk) 12:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Path slopu

    Greetings. I previously had AWB permission, but it was revoked due to inactivity. I would like to request access to it again to continue my works. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 17:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([2]). MusikBot talk 17:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Garsh2

    Hello! I am requesting access to the AWB to make typo correction, categorization, and other readability improvements a much quicker and easier process. I meet the 500 mainspace edits requirement, and my recent work with AfC and Ultraviolet demonstrates that I can use powerful tools responsibly. Garsh (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



    Confirmed

    User:Rmesrmes

    Dear Wikipedians: I'm a Brazilian user with a good grasp in Inkscape who is looking forward to help converting some raster images from the following page to SVG: Images that should be in SVG format

    My main interested in that is both to contribute to Wikipedia and to get more experience with vectorial illustrations. However, I cannot upload SVG versions in those images file history because my account is not autoconfirmed (it has less than 10 edits in EN Wikipedia, even though I have more than that in PT Wikipedia).

    I'm asking for the "confirmed" flag because I'll probably never do 10 or more edits in EN Wikipedia articles, mainly because I have good reading skills in English, but I'm at "base level" writing in that language. Rmesrmes (talk) 01:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Rmesrmes: you should be able to upload these images to Commons in most cases as most of the source images appear to have acceptable licensing. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Category:Convert to SVG and copy to Wikimedia Commons is the best place to start, you will be able to both get the experience you want, improve the images, and make them widely available to hundreds of other projects! — xaosflux Talk 14:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the input, Elli and xaosflux! I'll work through those images! I've also found another similar list at Wikimedia Commons here [3]. I believe both of those links solve my problem. Thanks! Rmesrmes (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done per above not needed. — xaosflux Talk 17:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Event coordinator


    Extended confirmed

    User:Jellyfish (mobile)

    Requesting extended-confirmed for my mobile account to match my main one. Rollback & pending changes not really necessary, but would like to be able to fix errors I spot on the go. Thanks! jellyfish  03:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Confirming from mobile that this is me. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 03:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Scoria.

    Met all criteria Scoria. (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Already done (automated response) by Scoria.. MusikBot talk 12:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    File mover


    Mass message sender

    User:Path slopu

    It's been a long time! I'm reaching out to request access to MMS permissions again, which were revoked due to inactivity. I'd like to continue working on my previous projects. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Elli (talk | contribs) 12:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


    New page reviewer

    User:MikutoH

    I believe I'm capable of reviewing new articles and drafts. Check my global contributions and user rights. Though this specific user group doesn't exist on ptwiki, my first-language/native Wikipedia, I believe I have potential in helping others creating articles and filtering enwiki. I have the draftify script installed and knowledge with policies. I've been working and have created some articles, such as Sapphism, Asexual flag, Plurisexuality, and Lists of LGBT politicians, as it shows, I have interest in sexuality area, as well as lists, categories, and redirects, as shown in my edits. --MikutoH talk! 00:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, thank you for volunteering. signed, Rosguill talk 13:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Extorc

    I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SafariScribe

    I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work in reviewing new pages. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 20:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:48JCL

    I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cowboygilbert

    I am requesting NPP rights to be able to help out with reviewing new pages and to potentially help fix new pages. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:HRShami

    I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CanonNi

    Hi. I would like to request an extension of my temporary NPP rights. Though I haven't been as active as I expected, I still reviewed some articles and participated in the May drive (thanks for the barnstar). I enjoyed the experience and would like to continue helping out whenever I can. Thanks for considering my request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 08:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Evilfreethinker

    I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Suntooooth

    I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\[reply]

    User:Anwegmann

    I was given a two-moth extension about two months ago, and I wanted to apply now for full-time approval to be a new page reviewer. I have been active in AfDs, and, as suggested in my temporary approval last time, I have reviewed many more pages than the first two months of my reviewership. All of the AfDs I have created have spawned genuine discussion, and I have also approved several new pages that pass the standards of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. I feel as though I have done enough to earn full-time approval, but I would appreciate any approval the admins are willing to give. I enjoy this work, and I enjoy helping clean up Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Anwegmann (talk) 00:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 00:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dr.AyushBhardwaj

    I want to contribute to Wikipedia in good sense and review new pages which provides good information regarding to the topic Dr.AyushBhardwaj (talk) 09:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Youknowwhoistheman

    I have made more than 8,500 edits as an editor over a time period of around 8 months. As per my request, I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work reviewing new pages. In addition to currently serving AFC Services, I am aware of Wikipedia policies such as WP:GNG, WP:BEFORE, WP:TOOSOON, WP:SIGCOV etc. I spend a lot of time understanding Wikipedia, and overall, I have learned a lot about Wikipedia policies. Thank you with warm Regards! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    In reviewing your editing history and considering concerns brought to my attention by other editors, I see several indications of problematic editing that at best suggest an inability to identify unreliable sources, and at worst covert UPE.  Not done. signed, Rosguill talk 13:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Page mover


    User:PadFoot2008

    Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and the five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Saqib

    So I plan on using it to address page move vandalism and for other non-controversial tasks such as WP:RM.— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Primefac (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Wowlastic10

    I am enough experienced for this role (as per the terms and conditions) and I will actively contribute to the community. Arigato! Wowlastic10 (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done for now; just because one meets the numerical requirements for a PERM does not mean they need to have that PERM. I see almost no RM participation, very few moves (especially ones that would require suppression of a redirect) and no RM/TR requests. If you actually find yourself needing this permission by all means feel free to request again in the future, but your request (and your experience from what I can see) does not indicate you do at this point in time. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


    Pending changes reviewer

    User:48JCL

    I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:HypeBoy

    I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Skitash

    I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Harpick

    I help with reverting vandalism, and have also read up on Wikipedia's policies on what content would be generally allowed here. -- Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 12 days. MusikBot talk 00:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    User:JoBoGamer

    Reason for requesting rollback rights: i have some experience reverting changes via Special:RecentChanges and i always warn users of reverts i make to their changes where possible, wether this be via RedWarn or via Twinkle.

    I think this could benefit me with reverting changes and have much less hassle with it all. JoBo Gamer (contribs) 11:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 79 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 13:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done Please see the notice at the top of this page; with only 79 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have the necessary editing experience for advanced permissions. Take a moment to check out CVUA, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Thanks, Fastily 00:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ok, cheers JoBo Gamer (contribs) 09:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Queen of Hearts

    Hello; I had rollback until I resigned in March because of lack of need. That said, I have recently ran into situations where this right would be helpful and I would like to get back into the flow of using Huggle and related tools again. Cheers, Queen of Heartstalk 23:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done DanCherek (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor