Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback/archive 3
- What I liked
How easy the videos were to understand and relate to.
- What I didn't like
There were a fair few pages for each topic, it could've been improved with multiple steps on each page.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
The amount of pages we had to click though
--Tlov (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I like how it explains every detail so you can be a pro at wiki.
- What I didn't like
I did not like how there was not many pictures as there should of been
- What was missing
I do not think anything was missing
- What was unnecessary
everything was necessary
--Meltedpudding (talk) 11:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...it is a good method to collect information from others
- What I didn't like
...the editing is a little complex, such as bold
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Invisible cake (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
... N/A
- What was missing
... Didn't think anything was missing
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing. --Chelseatheademan (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
Was not concise
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jajava (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jeremy.stojakovich (talk) 22:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I really liked that you could click on the video's to watch an editing tool be used.
- What I didn't like
...Since I am completely new to this, the orientation was A LOT of information all at once to take in - but obviously it had to be done that way.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Marikaeb (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the fact you had video with your training.
- What I didn't like
...It feeling like a huge amount of information to take in all at once.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jodplink (talk) 02:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Extremely helpful and succinct. I am now looking forward to editing an article.
- What was missing
I think more scenarios of editors starting the process to the finish.
- What I liked
- I really liked the screencast format, it makes it easy to follow along and see exactly what to do. Great job!
...
- What I didn't like
- It may be good to have a tutorial that you walk through with certain goals spelled out, like make certain words bold and add 3 links before moving on to the next page.
...
- What was missing
- more detail on how to create different sections and the proper way to space out paragraphs.
...
- What was unnecessary
- All of it was good!
...
--Loured36 (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...lengthy discussion on how to edit and the helpful videos
- What I didn't like
...not much interactive
- What was missing
... interactive material
- What was unnecessary
...
--Paullittle1979 (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Meganjeanne1 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...It was very informative of how to do edits and maneuver while in sandbox.
- What I didn't like
... The orientation was kind of long, but still helpful. --
- What was missing
... There could have been more videos.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Meganjeanne1 (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The guide was easy to follow and understand.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
The walkthrough could be more interactive.
- What was unnecessary
...
--IndigoDeberry (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very informative! I really got to know how Wikipedia works and how to navigate around. Was also helpful in discussing what and how to post.
- What I didn't like
...Too much information too quickly! I'll have to review it later when I'm thinking of posting an article :).
- What was missing
...Nothing I can think of now, but I'll be sure to let you know if I think of anything later!
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the supplementary videos.
--BenDobler (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos
...
- What I didn't like
- Nothing stands out
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing
...
--ToothFairyJenny (talk) 02:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Theseus001 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... it was short and easy to follow
- What I didn't like
... the skit about plagiarism
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... the skit about plagiarism everyone knows not to do it just say it --Theseus001 (talk) 03:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Editurregui (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...basic and straight forward
- What I didn't like
...nothing
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
--Editurregui (talk) 05:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very informative.
- What I didn't like
... There was nothing I did not like.
- What was missing
... I did not see that there was anything missing.
- What was unnecessary
... Nor, did I see anything that was unnecessary.
--Tahammond (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
BKeehan001 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...Videos were helpful. Instructions regarding Sandbox are going to be helpful. And the emphasis that making mistakes is part of getting to know the program.
- What I didn't like
...Long and wordy.
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
--BKeehan001 (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Jen Johnson (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... I liked the organization and layout of the material.Jen Johnson (talk) 19:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jen Johnson (talk) 19:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--192.149.13.20 (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
LSanford26 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... Broke down the instructions into easy to understand steps. The videos were helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--LSanford26 (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Newallis (talk) 20:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
EHerman2015 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... Each slide was not overwhelming to read and stayed on topic.
- What I didn't like
... The links seemed either very useful or completely unuseful
- What was missing
... Nothing!
- What was unnecessary
... Some of the links --EHerman2015 (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
DTrucksess (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... It was very informative.
- What I didn't like
... I wish it was more interactive, where I could walk through the actual steps to working with wiki, like it was explaining.
- What was missing
... The experience of actually using Wikipedia.
- What was unnecessary
... The repetition of what you are supposed to learn. --DTrucksess (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jboone21 (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Mtierney01 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...It gave ideas for how to find topics of interest or topics that could be expanded by our project.
- What I didn't like
...The directions for changing font and adding pictures etc. could be more detailed without having to watch the videos
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mtierney01 (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
CBriones001 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
It was very detailed and I liked how there were videos.
- What I didn't like
There was a lot of information to take in. Will definitely need a refresher.
- What was missing
I think they have it all covered.
- What was unnecessary
The extra external links within the modules were overwhelming.
--CBriones001 (talk) 01:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked all the videos and different links that gave me a more in depth look at wiki.
- What I didn't like
...the bullets had a lot of words and information on each page which made it hard for me to gather all the information.
- What was missing
...I wish ther would have been more photos of the pages instead of the videos that briefed by the images.
- What was unnecessary
...the additional wording and sentences on the pages that just reiterated the informaion that was bolded or highlighted to led to another link
--BMcInerney8792 (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- How clear cut everything was
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ndaher7 (talk) 18:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Awilliams001 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
I liked how the orientation gave details about and how they addressed the five pillars and how they explained. How they breakdown the information.
- What I didn't like
it was not that much I did not like it was just a lot of information
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
honestly I think that all of this stuff was necessary --Awilliams001 (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...how it explained how to create a good article
- What I didn't like
...everything seemed necessary to learn how to make a good Wiki page
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Fholder (talk) 19:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I that wikipedia had vedio aslo written word.
- What I didn't like
... some part could have more space between the phagraphs.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mmosier3 (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The training was straight forward and covered the basics. It had links to other places that had relevant information.
...
- What I didn't like
- N/A
...
- What was missing
- N/A
...
- What was unnecessary
- The information about the barnstars seemed unnecessary since we're just getting started.
...
--Khatchell (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Each topic was covered in a very short, simple style...
- What I didn't like
NA...
- What was missing
NA...
- What was unnecessary
NA...
--Elizabeth.Hurd423 (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Baileybrash (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- This training was very informative and covered a wide range of topics for beginners to Wikipedia such as myself.
...
- What I didn't like
- I feel as though some topics could have been covered a little more in depth.
...
- What was missing
- Depth on a few sections, mostly in terms of what can and can't be cited and how citations function technically.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I felt that all the current information in the training was good and nothing felt particularly unnecessary.
...
--Baileybrash (talk) 16:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked how all topics were covered
- What I didn't like
... I felt like some information was repetitive
- What was missing
... Perhaps how the wikipedia community works
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing --Dmbonsu (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jpoles1 (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bsmihali (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I enjoyed the helpful videos. ...
- What I didn't like
It was all great! ...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Saira (talk) 20:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I feel like the orientation answers all four corners of Wikipedia and how it works. I love the simplicity and shortness of each page.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--ZH92 (talk) 23:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Kevinzehnder (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kevinzehnder (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was clear, to the point, and engaging. I appreciated the use of other media displays rather than just mere text.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
- What should my user page look like? How do I set that up?
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Hihappy21 (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Deniselee26 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- Very clear of expectations
...
- What I didn't like
- I feel like I have to go back to be reminded of simple formatting tips.
...
- What was missing
- All pretty good!
...
- What was unnecessary
- n/a
...
--Deniselee26 (talk) 04:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
GavinCross (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- I thought that the training was fairly comprehensive and covered all of the essential information for contributing to wikipedia, which I liked.
...
- What I didn't like
- It was a little bit bland, and required a lot of clicking past small pages. It might be more easily digestible as a longer page to scroll through - going through the training felt a little bit tedious, like clicking through a slideshow. A longer-form type of presentation might have been better.
...
- What was missing
- I would be interested in seeing more information on the process of developing an article beyond a stub perhaps? Honestly not much was missing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Some parts of the training seemed relatively inessential, like the portion on barnstars at the end. They don't seem entirely crucial to the process of editing itself. That being said, I think it's still somewhat valuable information.
...
--GavinCross (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos made processes visually clear.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
Some of the videos were too repetitive with what was written in the text.
--Hannahrichter (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Amolutrankar (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
It was concise, and the additional videos gave extra instruction where needed.
- What I didn't like
The wikicode editing system seems complex at first, but I'm optimistic that the added 'beta' editor will make this process easier.
- What was missing
An overview page of wikicode would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
None; I thought it was all useful without additional fluff or non-substantive content.
--Amolutrankar (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was all short and to the point.
- What I didn't like
...Clicking through the pages was a little monotonous.
- What was missing
...I thought it was good and informative, so nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the videos were unnecessary for me to watch.
--Shelby thomas15 (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Everything was simple, to the point, and conveniently enhanced with short videos. I feel that I have enough of an understanding of Wikipedia to start contributing on my own.
...
- What I didn't like
- On a technical note, I had to open many of the videos in different tabs to properly view them. Otherwise I felt that some points were a little too simplistic and needed more elaboration.
...
- What was missing
- Perhaps examples from existing pages within the explanation text would help to clarify the use of coding in Wikipedia. For those without any computer science experience, some of the coding language can seem daunting at first.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The dialogue about plagiarism (with the pictures) was unnecessary. The question asked was something that could have been answered in the previous section. If this section were to be kept, it should probably reflect a "FAQ" orientation.
...
--DerekHolliday (talk) 22:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The information was concise and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...The videos did not play on my computer for some reason.
- What was missing
...Nothing, that I am aware of.
- What was unnecessary
...Everything was necessary.
--CarolineABrigham (talk) 03:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- good general information
...
- What I didn't like
- not very much editing coverage
...
- What was missing
- editing, such as how to make a new line
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--AlecLH (talk) 05:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very useful video links for the basics
- What I didn't like
All the extra garbage about liking other pages and such
- What was missing
Links to the Wikiprojects
- What was unnecessary
once again the praise for other pages
--Lbockhorn (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Information was straightforward and easy to understand
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kiarasanchez12 (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How short and to the point it was.
- What I didn't like
... I wish it would of given step by step for some processes.
- What was missing
... I think it should test on if you understood or give you exercises to practice.
- What was unnecessary
... I believe it was all necessary.
--Lwebb02 (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I found the detailed information on each step for editing a wiki page rather helpful;
- What I didn't like
...There was nothing that I didn't like about the information provided.
- What was missing
...I don't feel anything was missing from this tutorial and i look forward to utilizing what I learned in future projects.
- What was unnecessary
...Everything that was explained, i believe it to be rather necessary.
--ACaccamo (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the orientation is well written, easy to understand
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--RobertCKOjackson (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I like the format of the training, and the fact that it goes into details on how to choose a good article to edit.
- What I didn't like
...NA
- What was missing
...NA
- What was unnecessary
...NA
--Elizabeth.Hurd423 (talk) 01:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The training was helpful; and went through all the information that seemed necessary.
- What I didn't like
It was often repetitive/slow-moving.
- What was missing
At the moment, I can't think of anything that was missing.
- What was unnecessary
I thought the comics were kind of unnecessary, but interesting, and they will probably help me remember the subject better.
--Kimmyfromtexas (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The information was presented in a clear and simple way so that it is very user friendly.
- What I didn't like
Too much information at once, making it hard to retain everything.
Juliannadrew (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
short paragraphs ...
- What I didn't like
somewhat boring ...
- What was missing
i don't know yet ...
- What was unnecessary
I don't know yet ...
--Juliannadrew (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The ease of navigation.
- What I didn't like
...The quick editing overview.
- What was missing
...Videos with coding examples.
- What was unnecessary
...Everything seemed necessary.
--MJoe17 (talk) 03:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The display was laid out very well. Very organized.
- What I didn't like
A lot of little intricacies in here.
- What was missing
Nothing that I can think of.
- What was unnecessary
Too much content. Get to the point.
--Af918 (talk) 03:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bwl5 (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The information was very thorough.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... N/A
- What was unnecessary
...
--Missjenga (talk) 04:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Cebrown721 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- Down to earth, thorough explanations
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cebrown721 (talk) 14:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...There were multiple videos that actually gave me a visual on how things should be done.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Thankyouforbeauty (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... each of the videos was super helpful!
- What I didn't like
... sometimes the terminology was a little disorienting to follow for someone who was told NOT to use Wikipedia in secondary education.
- What was missing
... perhaps a word bank of sorts for quick definitions of some words, not necessarily a whole link to another page in needed
- What was unnecessary
... nothing that immediately comes to mind, thank you for all the help!
--CrysanthemumLogan (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Aharres4 (talk) 16:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mswofford (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jmsaint (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Alardenoit (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Alardenoit (talk) 21:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the information on where to find help from this point forward.
- What I didn't like
There was a small amount of frivolous information.
- What was missing
I did not feel that the training modules were missing anything.
--Brookeethleen (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Alardenoit (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
It contained a lot of helpful information that will be useful in this class. I really liked the editing cheat sheet and I think I will use it often.
- What I didn't like
I agree with Gavin that too much clicking was involved and one longer page would have been better.
- What was missing
N/a
- What was unnecessary
N/a
--Alardenoit (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how concise the information was.
- What I didn't like
How unintentionally confusing Wikicode was presented.
- What was missing
Further references to Wikicode, perhaps a video going through the basics would have been sufficient.
- What was unnecessary
I think it was all useful.
--Regina Leslie (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Allyscully (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...very easy to follow along tutorial readings and videos
- What I didn't like
...nothing
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
--Allyscully (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jpoles1 (talk) 22:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Khatchell (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The new edition version.
- What I didn't like
... No.
- What was missing
... It's good.
- What was unnecessary
... All is useful and helpful.
--Feihuamengxue (talk) 23:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
MichaelSamJr (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- The videos were very helpful.
...
- What I didn't like
- The written syntax was confusing.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Some slides were repetitive.
...
--MichaelSamJr (talk) 23:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Santatijay (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
I would like the training to consolidate pages: sometimes separating pages seemed unnecessary when topics were very related. Also, I didn't think the section on references was very clear.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
The mass amount of separate pages was not necessary.
--Santatijay (talk) 23:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bwl5 (talk) 00:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Danieldu8 (talk) 00:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Cchantre12 (talk)Feedback[edit]
- What I liked
...Very informative. Did a great job explaining process.
- What I didn't like
...A bit dry.
- What was missing
...Nothing in particular.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing in particular
--Cchantre12 (talk) 00:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Saira (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
CarolineABrigham (talk)Feedback for Wikipedia[edit]
- What I liked
...The depth and detail-orientation of the information.
- What I didn't like
...The videos were difficult to view.
- What was missing
...Nothing as far as I can tell.
- What was unnecessary
...I believe that each step/slide was necessary in order to understand how to properly use Wikipedia.
--CarolineABrigham (talk) 00:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very clear and simple! Not too many details that we don't need at this point, so that was nice.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
a link to a page of how to code (although maybe there was one and I didnt see it)
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ktpost68 (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very thorough
- What I didn't like
A little long
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jakejohnston1 (talk) 01:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sessama7 (talk) 01:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Brodgers15 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
I liked that the orientation was simple and easy to understand and gave good information on how to go about writing articles that I can consult later.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
More examples could have been provided.
- What was unnecessary
I found all the information useful.
--Brodgers15 (talk) 01:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the videos showing the editing process. They were helpful.
- What I didn't like
Some of the material was a little hard to follow.
- What was missing
A clear visual representation of the edits.
- What was unnecessary
It was all necessary.
--Susan2016 (talk) 02:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Momo137 (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bwnabors (talk) 03:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sallyhc42 (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very clear and concise, and it didn't have overwhelming amounts of information at each step.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Deyee (talk) 08:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The videos that demonstrated how to make edits, upload pictures, were helpful for those who are better visual leaners.
- What I didn't like
... Having to go to a different page to practice edits.
- What was missing
... Perhaps a space on the orientation page to practice edits rather than having to open another tab/window to practice might be more beneficial.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kapplet (talk) 14:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Great use of videos mixed in with the material. Being a visual learner I found that helpful.
- What I didn't like
...I can't really think of anything. The information was appropriate for a beginner editor.
- What was missing
...I know you covered it briefly in the advanced section and have other places to find more information about it but going a bit more in depth with adding different types of media could possibly be a little more helpful.
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
--Tapbh (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Very helpful in the areas of editing and etiquette. The how to videos were also a great addition.
...
- What I didn't like
- More info could fit on one slide rather than having so many slides.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- NOthing was unnecessary
...
--Darexo (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was accessible language and didn't make me worry too much about not being formerly acquainted with Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--NSully83 (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Different sections provided and explained for they were for. Different pillars about Wikipedia. Easy to read
- What I didn't like
- Too much information to take in.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ekarajic (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
i liked the step by step explanation.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Emariemag (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was detailed and included videos.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Tatej (talk) 18:42, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Cristell24 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cristell24 (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--DSKireai (talk) 23:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...This gave me a better idea of how to use Wikipedia, edit Wikipedia, and what is appropriate beginner topics.
- What I didn't like
...When I went to my sandbox to do the bold thing as in the directions, nothing bolded. I am a bit confused by that. Am I doing something wrong? I know working with it more will help me understand, though.
- What was missing
...I won't really know for sure what's missing until I have been using Wikipedia for awhile and then go back to review this. I'll probably find something along the way I wish was in this introduction. Perhaps, send me an e-mail after I have been using Wikipedia for a month or so to see how things are going.
- What was unnecessary
...I didn't think anything was unnecessary. I will definitely be reviewing these pages as I use Wikipedia more.
--Lhegtvedt (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Learning the special codes used by Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...The pace of the instructional videos. It was very slow.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the welcome information.
--Cornellwx (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the simple pages and bullet points. It made it extremely easy to follow and to understand the expectations of being a contributor.
...
- What I didn't like
- There wasn't really anything I didn't like. It was very straightforward.
...
- What was missing
- Maybe some quotes or anecdotes about users' first time experiences because I'm sure people get nervous with their first post.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
--AlyssaG92 (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very helpful
- What I didn't like
...too long
- What was missing
...interactive training
- What was unnecessary
...amount of pages
--Mariannegrigoli (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The fact that the content was segmented and not presented in one giant chunk of text. This made it easier to peruse and absorb. I also liked the clearly organized table of contents!
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
It would have been interesting to get more of the backstory on Wikipedia, how it was created, and how it has evolved to become what it is today.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--Ckc63 (talk) 04:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Lindsey2194 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lindsey2194 (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was easy to read and understand. Also, it didn't take a lot of time.
- What I didn't like
- Nothing! I thought it was fine!
- What was missing
- I don't know enough about Wikipedia to give an answer.
- What was unnecessary
- It all seemed good!
--ShannonClare06 (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--AnnCod3 (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
the videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--AnahiSantiago (talk) 19:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- the five pillars
...
- What I didn't like
- the youtube instruction videos
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- the youtube videos
...
--Erinirene (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Pjmn811 (talk) 21:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Peyk123 (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Onlinecommedits (talk) Feedback[edit]
- What I liked
...I liked how there were videos and everything was organized.
- What I didn't like
...A lot of content to cover in just one session.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Onlinecommedits (talk) 04:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Bhalloran10 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bhalloran10 (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the way it was paced out from beginning to end. Also The way it explained all the features you have available was nice.
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--Kpol1298 (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Learning the Wikipedian syntax for coding the pages.
- What I didn't like
How complex the process is.
- What was missing
I don't know.
- What was unnecessary
I don't know.
--Nicole.cooprider (talk) 19:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was straightforward, firm, and friendly!
- What I didn't like
It was redundant on ocassion.
- What was missing
A sort of compendium of tags for wiki-work would be awesome! There are a lot and it's hard to remember them all.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing!
--Caitlin (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The scope, and the information provided were incredibly helpful. I plan on investigating the Teahouse later today!
- What I didn't like
I would have preferred a general video for the entire orientation process. I personally find videos, specifically with audio, more engaging. Just my personal preference.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--CBCompton (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)CBCompton
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Deshemp (talk) 02:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Seemed to cover all information needed to use Wikipedia
...
- What I didn't like
- A lot of information seemed basic and common sense, although may-be not for everyone.
...
- What was missing
- Seemed thorough.
...
- What was unnecessary
- All seemed necessary for the most basic user.
...
--Sara8s001 (talk) 14:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
66.90.232.64 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--66.90.232.64 (talk) 15:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
66.90.232.64 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Clear easy to understand
- What I didn't like
nothing
- What was missing
nothing that I noticed
- What was unnecessary
the length --66.90.232.64 (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Everything was well detail and that help me understand how to use Wikipedia better.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Fapage (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--BertramHarney (talk) 20:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
AchillesTX (talk)[edit]
- What I Liked
I liked that there was visual aides with videos.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--AchillesTX (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
To the point.
- What I didn't like
Accompanying videos were dull, but that tends to happen with such straight-forward content.
- What was missing
Everything seemed to be covered.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Eas295 (talk) 22:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Andrew.prafder (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The article was very informative. It was easy to understand and the video aids helped me understand the more technical things.
- What I didn't like
... nothing
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... everything was self explanatory. --Neftalivilchis (talk) 23:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Lllauderda (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... I understand more about the Talk in the top corner of the page
- What I didn't like
... So much information that I know I'll have to come back to figure things out for when I actually use it.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lllauderda (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Allielew00 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- very in-depth and easy to understand
...
- What I didn't like
- a lot of information in a short orientation
...
- What was missing
- n/a
...
- What was unnecessary
- the videos were helpful but not necessary
...
--Allielew00 (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The ease of going through the training.
- What I didn't like
...The fact that every section began with what we should learn by the end of the lesson, instead of jumping into the subject.
- What was missing
...A few real examples for certain aspects such as setting font to bold. Instead of just showing what the "command" looks like, it would be much easier to see it in a real example.
- What was unnecessary
...
--ChristianLugar (talk) 01:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Amlamastra (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- The Detailed step by step process of how to work the site.
...
- What I didn't like
... The orientation was a little overwhelming especially with all the codes needed to edit and create sites.
- What was missing
... I'm not sure if I noticed anything that should be added .
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing was unnecessary but all the codeing was a lot. --Amlamastra (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The explanations are very detailed.
- What I didn't like
...Some tutorial videos don't have written explanations.
- What was missing
...I don't see any.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Db9023 (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that the wiki training offered videos and media clips with clear instruction on how to carry out the tasks on the site.
- What I didn't like
... There really wasn't anything I did not like or disagreed with.
- What was missing
... Nothing that I have noticed so far but I am new to wiki, so there's a chance this opinion could change when I become more familiar with the site.
- What was unnecessary
... The amount of time spent on upsetting other editors, I feel that this is an established site, and people should act appropriately on their own, however, we are dealing with the human race here, and I suppose no one is perfect, so perhaps the seemingly larger amount of time spent on this topic was necessary. --Niccox20 (talk) 02:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- how simple it was made
...
- What I didn't like
- how anyone can edit
...
- What was missing
- nothing made everything clear
...
- What was unnecessary
- the grade of articles
...
--Jatpyle (talk) 03:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very informative ...
- What I didn't like
Nothing really ...
- What was missing
Nothing really ...
- What was unnecessary
All was relevant ...
--Hbrowncuellar (talk) 04:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Simple and informative.
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--Chasebill (talk) 05:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
juntilla87[edit]
- What I liked
...most of the information provided focused on how to edit which is very important
- What I didn't like
...very lengthy, a lot of reading but necessary
- What was missing
...the "creating an account basics"
- What was unnecessary
...
- What I liked
...Very informative.
- What I didn't like
...Bland and lacked visuals.
- What was missing
...Visual presentation and guidance.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Paythepiper85 (talk) 05:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.211 (talk) 05:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was detailed and engaging.
- What I didn't like
I felt it was too informal.
- What was missing
Nothing, so to speak.
- What was unnecessary
Some of the images.
--Vanessagalactica (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Victory of the Burgh (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The tutorial videos were extremely helpful.
...
- What I didn't like
- The weird formatting of the page.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing I can think of.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Having it set up as separate pages rather than in the Wikipedia article style.
...
--Josemags (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos were helpful, and the "slides" were short enough that my attention was kept.
- What I didn't like
Nothing, it was great!
- What was missing
I'll have to get back to you after I play around on Wikipedia for a bit...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing that I know of!
--Stack0711 (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Eddie.oneill1213 (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
... The format of my wiki page did not match the format used in the youtube videos.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--G p34 (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very to the point and clear
- What I didn't like
... Kind of drug on, to long and monotone!
- What was missing
... More pop, attention getting to boring
- What was unnecessary
... nothing just needs to be revamped.
--Reyes1092 (talk) 20:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Response[edit]
- What I liked
- Easy Setup and very easy to understand.
...
- What I didn't like
- A little dry and boring to read.
...
- What was missing
- More video examples.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing. Everything was generally good.
...
--Nighttime8181 (talk) 20:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Nebelmeister (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Good easy intro.
- What I didn't like
Videos weren't loading well.
- What was missing
It would be really cool if there was a way to have an interactive learning process for learning the Wikipedia markup language. It would probably Jquery to do it in real time instantly, and show the code and it's appearance side-by-side in a little demo. Much like the online resources for learning regex or SQL.
Maybe more clarification of what a sandbox is.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing I can think of. It would be cool if the whole thing were just a video or just more interactive.
--Nebelmeister (talk) 21:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Lnestar500 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lnestar500 (talk) 23:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Cornellax16 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cornellax16 (talk) 23:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
147.26.87.16 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- all
...
- What I didn't like
- none
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
--147.26.87.16 (talk) 23:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
How to pick an article to write about, and the specific guidelines
- What I didn't like
The redundant information that is featured in some sections
- What was missing
More information about to do research for an article, such as sources etc
- What was unnecessary
The redundant information again
--Ksb93 (talk) 00:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Laurenjlloyd (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...I liked the examples when describing how to edit.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Laurenjlloyd (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
JLieberman31 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... Informative
- What I didn't like
... Long
- What was missing
... Realistic examples
- What was unnecessary
... nothing --JLieberman31 (talk) 00:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos
...
- What I didn't like
- There was a lot of reading and the instructions to the code was hard to follow
...
- What was missing
- Nothing really!
...
- What was unnecessary
- Everything was acceptable
...
--Victr1297 (talk) 00:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
J grider65 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--J grider65 (talk) 01:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Emilyn Teh (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Emilyn Teh (talk) 01:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
IchiniSanti (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Pages weren't too bloated with info.
- What I didn't like
Having to click through each page was kind of a pain.
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--IchiniSanti (talk) 01:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was short and to the point.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--FingersInFood (talk) 01:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--D(QQ)b (talk) 01:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
not too long
- What I didn't like
nothing
- What was missing
an area for practicing the editing techniques that were described. i just opened a new tab to try some things out, so no big deal..
- What was unnecessary
nothing
--Bkilli1 (talk) 01:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
How quick and and easy the information was.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Zk43 (talk) 02:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Brittany Berliner (talk) 02:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Slk249 (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.211 (talk) 02:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Brian.angelle (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Boomwhackers (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... That you could go at your own pace
- What I didn't like
... It was all one color and one font. The whole module seemed a bit unorganized and thrown together.
- What was missing
... How to navigate Wikipedia better. The history of the site. What it does in the non-English world.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Boomwhackers (talk) 04:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the barnstar idea.
- What I didn't like
... Should have some of the vids combined.
- What was missing
... Covers everything that I can see.
- What was unnecessary
... I don't have an opinion on this.
--Mer17171 (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Mer17171 (talk)Training again[edit]
- What I liked
...It was informative.
- What I didn't like
...Doing it again under student...
- What was missing
...Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing.
--Mer17171 (talk) 04:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the editing section
- What I didn't like
...the unnecessary information
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...n/a
--Jyp25 (talk) 05:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Loudcitysong (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Brief and highly readable.
- What I didn't like
Glosses over technical aspects a little bit, but I'm sure it won't be that big of an issue.
- What was missing
See previous answer.
- What was unnecessary
Everthing looked necessary.
--Loudcitysong (talk) 06:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The simple and straightforward nature of the training.
- What I didn't like
...Lack of substantial explanation for coding (syntax) aspects of working with Wikipedia.
- What was missing
...Everything seemed to have been covered.
- What was unnecessary
...A few of the pages regarding common courtesy for participating seemed slightly redundant, but not unnecessary.
--Ric.chi (talk) 13:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Antoinette011 (talk)Antoinette011[edit]
- What I liked
- Very detailed explanations.
...
- What I didn't like
- Having to use codes to do something instead of having a button to do it.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Antoinette011 (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very informative
- What I didn't like
...Long and slightly misguided at times
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sjl272 (talk) 16:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very informative on all process that Wikipedia goes through.
- What I didn't like
... The length was questionable, but it is needed to fully describe the process.
- What was missing
... Not much, I have a very clear grasp on how to use Wikipedia now.
- What was unnecessary
... Not much, like I said, I enjoyed learning all the different processes.
--Johnmccarthyyy (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Amholton12 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Amholton12 (talk) 00:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jessicamartin174 (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very easy to follow, well organized.
- What I didn't like
... Nothing to mention.
- What was missing
... Not sure I can answer that now as a beginner to all this. Maybe after working on editing I could say what was missing from the module.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing to mention.
--Slj758 (talk) 02:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked how the training was simplified for beginners like me but advanced as my understanding became more clear. I also liked the idea to start editing less controversial and large articles as a beginner.
- What I didn't like
...Not Applicable.
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--KevinBrownJHU (talk) 07:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 07:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Clear and showed me the steps seperately so it was easier to understand. Videos were helpful/
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Qwertyp23 (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...Too much reading.
- What was missing
...Not enough videos
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kimberly.Ling300 (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It clearly outlined expectations
- What I didn't like
...It was a little long, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I will have to review all the content again before moving forward in creating a page.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cortnaynicole89 (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ryoung04 (talk) 21:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos. Short condensed text.
- What I didn't like
Words..
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
--2450jk996 (talk) 22:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Structure, clarity, understandable, formal
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Saadams3 (talk) 22:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Laujoanna (talk) 23:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
DylanRHaynes (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
-Streamlined -Modulated -Helpful Media
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
-The use of more uncommon editing features
- What was unnecessary
-How to give Barnstars
--DylanRHaynes (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Eliachow (talk) 02:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Modules were very easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
Pages a little slow to load. Videos should work in Safari.
- What was missing
The coding info is a bit confusing, even when someone has a background in HTML or the like.
- What was unnecessary
All info seemed relevant.
--Jeffbn (talk) 02:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Heykei1 (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very informative and I definitely learned some things about wikipedia that I didn't know. Blairwal (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I didn't like
... There was a lot of info about how to edit and format, it was very useful but very difficult to remember all of that for future reference. Might be more helpful to skip most of that at first and have a separate page with all the info about how to make certain editing/formatting changes. Blairwal (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Blairwal (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Emmalee2814 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Emmalee2814 (talk) 03:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The information about the topic is passed effectivelly.
- What I didn't like
...The videos that did not work.
- What was missing
Nothing. Overall, it was great. ...
- What was unnecessary
Everything is relevant. ...
--129.78.233.210 (talk) 03:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Videos explained things in simple terms, visual aid helped me learn
...
- What I didn't like
- Nothing that I particularly disliked
...
- What was missing
- Perhaps an explanation on how to determine whether or not photos have a Wikipedia-compatable copywriter
...
- What was unnecessary
- Didn't find anything unnecessary
...
--Nia2993 (talk) 04:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
KARDuVarney (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- Clear and Simple.
...
- What I didn't like
- Repetitive Format.
...
- What was missing
- Multiple Examples.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
--KARDuVarney (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...All information was presently efficiently, short and clear.
- What I didn't like
...Strange font choices at times.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...I liked the pictures that included the wiki-founders, however it seemed out of place compared to the rest of the modules.
--Zipzer0h (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Each section of the training site was clear and it held useful reference to commonly asked questions. I also thought the videos included in some sections were quite useful.
--Dtcoa (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Rossana-Edwards * Questions/Answers*[edit]
- What I liked
... I like how Wikipedia shows a lot of information about almost if not everything there is about anything.
- What I didn't like
... I didn't like how long the training prossess was but there is a lot of information that needs to be learned.
- What was missing
... Maybe during the training, there could be sections where the student would pratic what to do like working in the sandbox and it shows what the student is doing right or wrong.
- What was unnecessary
... There was a lot of information to learn so I wouldn't be sure what would be considered unnecessary.
--Rossana-Edwards (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cbue1836 (talk) 00:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...short, specific and provided all the necessary links to more detailed information.
- What I didn't like
...not much, but it will require a revisit from time to time while getting used to it all
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Aleksmar (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Nsodhi (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very clear and concise
- What I didn't like
...It was slightly longer than was necessary for a beginner
- What was missing
...Nothing that i notices
- What was unnecessary
...I thought everything but the fourth module was fairly relevant for a beginner
--Sccrawford444 (talk) 01:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--JayTdash (talk) 01:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--G0nrs (talk) 02:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was simple and straightforward
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lchan519 (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was easy to understand and well structured.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...Nothing was missing
- What was unnecessary
...
--West1888 (talk) 02:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Was very informative.
- What I didn't like
Took a while.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--WRIT1001Bella (talk) 02:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Taylalouise (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... Interesting to learn how Wikipedia works.
- What I didn't like
... Wont remember all the editing tips.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Taylalouise (talk) 02:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Kfurano1129 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
I loved the video content; very helpful!
- What I didn't like
Everything was great!
- What was missing
Nothing - I felt like this was a comprehensive introduction, which I will continue to reference.
- What was unnecessary
As a newcomer to Wikipedia, I found all of the information very helpful
--Kfurano1129 (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...How everything was simple and well explained.
- What I didn't like
...There was nothing I didn't like.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I could see
- What was unnecessary
...Can't recall anything as being unnecessary.
--Lhil9582 (talk) 03:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ocro (talk) 03:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
helpful[edit]
- What I liked
... visual explainning
youtube, pictures
- What I didn't like
... in editing section, there was too many words on slides.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kyungjunkim (talk) 04:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Elsherlb (talk) 04:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mliv3394 (talk) 04:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Ixchelmybell (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...I tended to get a little boring
- What was missing
...There wasn't much interaction
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ixchelmybell (talk) 04:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Johnathan jones (talk) 04:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jenny129 (talk) 04:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Pettercool (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...The Sandbox idea
- What I didn't like
...The citing style
- What was missing
...Who edited the resource first? who edited second? The order of people who edited the resources
- What was unnecessary
...Some decription for the resource
--Pettercool (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Youtube videos on how-to's
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Checkerblocks (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Andreametry (talk)Training[edit]
- What I liked
...everything was explained with videos and pictures
- What I didn't like
...was a little bit long
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...everything was good
--Andreametry (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Skitit (talk) 05:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I really liked the way I got to learn more about which article is a good article.
- What I didn't like
...I didn't really get how the citing was done even though it was explanined. I think it was explanined not clearly.
- What was missing
...I think there should be more examples in each section so that without having backgrounds, the reader could know more about.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Loveksy88 (talk) 06:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Sienna55555 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
I never knew what it really took to make it to Wikipedia. I have always taken it for granted. I thought the scale of the whole site was amazing and I think the fact that the orientation even exists is a good way to regulate the site.
- What I didn't like
Sometimes tedious. I have to say the coding parts put me off, it makes it difficult to be drawn to contribute when it's hard to do so. However, the way it was approached, with video instructions for further detail, was very useful.
- What was missing
Nothing, I think it covered everything. And if I was to have any questions, the orientation made it seem like they would be easy enough to find answers to
- What was unnecessary
All the clicking to next pages. I feel everything covered was necessary. Perhaps it wouldn't be to everyone, but I think it's a good base of information to get started.
--Sienna55555 (talk) 06:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Taynasouza (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Taynasouza (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Charlotte1722 (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Taforest (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Byung do jung (talk) 07:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[edit]
- What I liked
... By clicking some pages, i got a useful information such as how to i use edit tool
- What I didn't like
... But it is sort of long :(
- What was missing
... Nothing i think? Am i omit something?
- What was unnecessary
... Absolutely nothing
--Byung do jung (talk) 07:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that it included a lot of important information, including information on some of the more basic areas.
- What I didn't like
... I found some of it difficult to follow at times.
- What was missing
... I think some parts needed a video tutorial that didn't already have one.
- What was unnecessary
... I think that not everything that was covered needed to be covered all in one go. --Samantha 1012 (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was easy to follow, i particularly liked the videos with captions
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--124.168.30.248 (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was certainly comprehensive and covered everything I needed to know.
- What I didn't like
It was quite long, but perhaps it needed to be.
- What was missing
I'm new, I can't really say yet
- What was unnecessary
For me some of the basics of coding were unnecessary, but for anyone inexperienced I imagine it would be useful
Gemini437 (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... evreything
- What I didn't like
...some things
- What was missing
...not much
- What was unnecessary
...not much
--Rdav2361 (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Eveything
- What I didn't like
Nothing
- What was missing
Nothing
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
--Idc2987 (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...There are very useful informations in this orientation. I learned about how to edit Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Donghwan Seong (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Amdimaggio (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Amdimaggio (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Rpacheco0013 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...It was all boring
- What was missing
...more interaction
- What was unnecessary
...
--Rpacheco0013 (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
69.231.203.6 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--69.231.203.6 (talk) 17:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Quinnlambert (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
The informative wikicodes.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Quinnlambert (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
♥ detailed and informative with links for additional reference ♥ neutral point of view ♥ easy to understand
- What I didn't like
♥ it was great, nothing in particular I didn't like
- What was missing
♥ more images (eg. screenshots) to illustrate what is going on
- What was unnecessary
♥ the "dialogue" comic for plagerism... plain text is fine too
--Saulina.w (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Wildcator (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jhar4933 (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... each page was brief and to the point of main ideas to understand, and the links were helpful.
- What I didn't like
... some of the sections had a lot of pages and the referencing was quite complicated to remember
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--H-la1477 (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very good coverage.
- What I didn't like
A little high and mighty maybe.
- What was missing
Nothing really.
- What was unnecessary
--Wuni321 (talk) 00:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia training feedback[edit]
- What I liked
The Five Pillar Structure
- What I didn't like
It was rather boring but I suppose it'd be pretty difficult to make a how-to for Wikipedia all that interesting
- What was missing
Nothing I could specifically point out, it was quite a good general overview
- What was unnecessary
The editing section, I've always viewed that as rather straightforward
--58.173.72.71 (talk) 01:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was informative and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
... No interactive pages. Had to open another tab to practice.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--EchoAC (talk) 01:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Very useful for newcomers.
...
- What I didn't like
- Not much, but it may seem hard to manage.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing really for me.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
--E9P2 (talk) 02:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was comprehensive and gave a great amount of detail in the major topics
- What I didn't like
... At times there was too much information
- What was missing
... Not enough videos
- What was unnecessary
...
--Asefski (talk) 03:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The easy step by step instructions
- What I didn't like
... Nothing
- What was missing
... Everything needed to know was shown
- What was unnecessary
... The quotes
--Mariahmoujalli (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The tutorial very clear and concise.
- What I didn't like
...The videos were dull. More examples from other wikipedia pages would be helpful.
- What was missing
...More detail on the copyright and plagiarism aspects of Wikipedia.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mchan15 (talk) 03:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very clear and concise
- What I didn't like
...Videos weren't super helpful
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ecramos1 (talk) 04:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Milena.Vaz (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
All of the helpful links and information that covered lots of the main technical and background Wikipedia information that I was not aware of. I liked learning more about the site that I find myself accessing fairly frequently.
- What I didn't like
I didn't like that the video's didn't play in my browser, but I was able to access them after switching.
- What was missing
Nothing I can think of at the moment was missing.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--Milena.Vaz (talk) 04:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lucygold (talk) 04:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Lilrodgers (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
How well organised and clear everything was.
- What I didn't like
There wasn't much of an explanation expressing where everything was located, e.g. sandbox "in the top right corner of the page".
- What was missing
Images of exactly where all the links etc are located.
- What was unnecessary
The video clips.
--Lilrodgers (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... dkw --Zoetombs (talk) 08:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the way it showed us the HTML codes for making new links on a page. I also liked the pictures and the detailed explanations. Everything was really easy to understand, and there was just the right amount of information.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... It should include more examples of different 'grades' of the pages (eg. stubs)
- What was unnecessary
...
--ANingToRemember (talk) 14:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
wiki training for WRIT1001[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--The One True Asian (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Caseyafoster (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...The links to the video tutorials were extremely helpful, thank you!
- What I didn't like
...Some of the steps were a bit repetitive.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Caseyafoster (talk) 18:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It used very friendly language and was easy to follow, step by step. And that it gave links for references in future editing.
- What I didn't like
...It assumes that the reader knows more about formatting/coding than they might actually know.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Quigend (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The links and instructional videos were quite helpful.
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
Practice exercises might have been helpful.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing, I would have liked even more information.
--Gdirado (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos were very helpful. I used the youtube link because the imbedded video would not load very quickly.
- What I didn't like
I didn't like that the training did not keep track of the pages I had already completed. It kept track within a day. But after 1 day, it appeared as though I had not gone through any of the training slides.
- What was missing
A slide that is specific about the education program may have been useful, to help orient me in how/if it is different from becoming a wiki contributor outside a classroom project.
- What was unnecessary
I found all the slides to be helpful.
--Mallorytonner (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--58.104.20.139 (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Shirleykim (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- informative - conventional for future use - shifted previous misconceptions i had about Wikipedia
- What I didn't like
- it was too long - the editing (technical) aspect of it was a bit difficult
- What was missing
- n/a
- What was unnecessary
- nothing. it was all relevant and useful information.
--Shirleykim (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Lisalazuli (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lisalazuli (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the interactiveness and the simplicity of the explanations
- What I didn't like
... nothing
- What was missing
... a bit more colour.
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
--Itsvkee (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC) itsvkee
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mooy1 (talk) 04:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Orientation[edit]
- What I liked
... the fact that it went through in enough detail to inform us how Wikipedia works
- What I didn't like
... the links don't open in another tab which means that you might forget the page you were on
- What was missing
... tutorial audio
- What was unnecessary
... nothing I can think of
--Eshna2305 (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... easy to read,
- What I didn't like
... the videos didnt work
- What was missing
...more colors
- What was unnecessary
...seperating editing and advanced editing
--Alannaht (talk) 04:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Writing and Rhetoric[edit]
- What I liked
It was informative and well presented.
- What I didn't like
I didn't not like anything.
- What was missing
I thought it was good
- What was unnecessary
I didn't find anything unnecessary.
--Briwrit1001 (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--60.225.222.143 (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... can know all the reference and can edit easily
- What I didn't like
... everyone can edit it , so sometime doesn't if is authentic or not
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Hcha8804 (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Sparklemily (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... I liked that there was both writing and video tutorial information
- What I didn't like
... that it was slightly dry in providing the information
- What was missing
... A link to how to get back to this tutorial after you start editing on wikipedia as some of the information gathered may have been forgotten
- What was unnecessary
... I thought all the information provided was relevant --Sparklemily (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Clear presentation of information
- What I didn't like
It was quite long.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
Having such short segments so that the page has to be reloaded so often to progress.
--David.andrews94 (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
jessica464 - WRIT1001[edit]
Informative presentation
A bit lengthy though
- jessica464
Jessica Nedene Barakat
- What I liked
I liked how the information were clear and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
Well, I was fine with everything I read.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
It was all good.
--Chandhinipandey (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Jirwin1097 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jirwin1097 (talk) 20:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hailey M D (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- broken down into easy-to-wrap-the-head-around chunks
- learn at your own pace model
- videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Hailey M D (talk) 21:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--BASEDbio (talk) 22:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The way the orientation was organized into modules.
- What I didn't like
...Videos did not play correctly.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Stephanie lepage (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was organized in a very easy-to-understand, step-by-step fashion that guided through all the important things we need to know before we start editing on Wikipedia. ...
- What I didn't like
There was maybe too much information as a starters introduction... and it would have been better if the youtube videos played successfully on the page... ...
- What was missing
It would have been better if we could practice each of the editing and citing points, for example, on the site page right after they are explained. ...
- What was unnecessary
The youtube videos were long, most of the time. ...
--Chinadianalmonds (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Covers everything from policies to editing syntax, so I learn about all the essentials.
- What I didn't like
... Some modules didn't go into enough detail, especially the editing syntax areas.
- What was missing
... More examples of editing how-to, such as italicizing, spelling and grammar checking, and organizing of other articles.
- What was unnecessary
... Comics about copyright policy, instead of illustrations for editing processes. --Vi.gomez (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Lauragentles (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
sandbox
- What I didn't like
nothing
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
nothing
- What I liked
...it went in good detail, explaining everything thoroughly.
- What I didn't like
...it was a bit tedious and boring.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--122.106.184.129 (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
That although in most part the information was rather basic, each section contained hyper links for further familiarity and readings on the subject.
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing was really unnecessary though at times perhaps a bit longer than required. --Klun7242 (talk) 02:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Pessimarilia (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
The topics were introduced in a simple and concise way; everything was really easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
The section on text editing was a bit sparse.
- What was missing
More on basic text editing besides how to bold text and add links...
- What was unnecessary
The dialogue on Copyright and plagiarism.
--Pessimarilia (talk) 02:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Katedumbrell (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Videos for most sections
- What I didn't like
some confusing vocab. used,that was not really clarified for the most part
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Katedumbrell (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I thought it was easy to follow and gave the information in an informative manner.
...
- What I didn't like
- I would have preferred to not have to shuffle through multiple slides for each section.
...
- What was missing
- I don't think anything was missing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I thought it was all necessary.
...
--T1d7 (talk) 03:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The content was explained very clearly.
- What I didn't like
... I think that it would have been better to require interaction at each step.
- What was missing
... Required interaction.
- What was unnecessary
... All parts were useful. --Becksreed (talk) 05:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
short and to the point information
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dgod6150 (talk) 05:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How excruciatingly detailed it was.
- What I didn't like
... Some of the articles were long-winded.
- What was missing
... I didn't notice anything missing that I would need.
- What was unnecessary
... Quite a lot of the videos that was attached seemed a little unnecessary.
--Fredkim91 (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The guide was easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
... It seemed like a bit too much information at once.
- What was missing
... There could have been more interactive exercises in terms of editing.
- What was unnecessary
... The YouTube videos.
--Mbeez (talk) 06:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The orientation was clear and concise. The videos were helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lucgir (talk) 07:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was clear, and doesn't drag on.
- What I didn't like
No comment
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
A long introduction
--Luna oul (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.210 (talk) 12:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Chelseanne (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...The tutorial provided a comprehensive guide on how to navigate the site by providing useful YouTube videos. I thought they provided the clarity that I needed to get through the different modules. They are also good for future reference. As a new Wikipedian, the training was useful in that it was a step by step guide thoroughly explaining what I was about to go through. The breaking up of the training through modules was helpful and I liked how we would receive a completion check mark after.
- What I didn't like
...Although it is in the nature of Wikipedia for links to be integrated everywhere, I found it distracting to keep clicking on the links throughout training. I was not sure if I should have read all the links or not. I did bookmark some I thought would be useful later. Also, the videos were very helpful, but the quality of them made it a bit difficult to view.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Chelseanne (talk) 15:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that it was a simple and precise, yet it offered links to areas that would offer more information.
- What I didn't like
... There wasn't anything that I didn't really like.
- What was missing
... Nothing that I can think of at the moment.
- What was unnecessary
... Everything present was essential it seemed. I am a new Wikipedia user and so I did not know what would be necessary, however it seems that any questions that arose were quickly answered.
--Corrina Tapia (talk) 18:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Ashleykedra (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
It answered all my questions. I also liked the videos. ...
- What I didn't like
Nothing I can think of. ...
- What was missing
Nothing I can think of. ...
- What was unnecessary
I think everything there was necessary. ...
--Ashleykedra (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The vidoes made concepts easier to understand than they were when they were just written out
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
Nothing
- What was unnecessary
Everything worked fine
--Amandaxrasmussen (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Elibreitman (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Elibreitman (talk) 21:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Tanyamcamper (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- the videos
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Tanyamcamper (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
A lot of links for additional help
- What I didn't like
Introduction pages were too wordy. Just get to the content.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sefacci (talk) 23:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Elisa lara (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- I enjoyed the videos. They were helpful to see examples than t just read.
...
- What I didn't like
- I really didn't like all the technical talk. It's hard to keep up with and is a turn off when you're just trying to learn and want things to be extremely simple.
...
- What was missing
- I don't feel anything was missing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I don't feel anything was unnecessary.
...
--Elisa lara (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... info on starting an article from scratch, such as how to make sub-headings
- What was unnecessary
...
--Paola0329 (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Videos
- What I didn't like
... Length, repetitiveness
- What was missing
... Questions to make sure there was understanding
- What was unnecessary
...
--Becca.a.sanders (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- i liked that it explained everything in detail, and the video allowed for further understanding
...
- What I didn't like
- at times it was tedious and boring, needed to be more concise
- What was missing
- interactive questions/multiple choice
...
- What was unnecessary
- clicking all the arrows, got every irritating towards the end.
...
--Jared.palmer94 (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The training included a lot of video, so I can understand easily.
- What I didn't like
...It is difficult to post an article on Wikipedia, I need to remember a lot of computer language.
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Computer language.
--NMinhDuy (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Informative videos.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Pozmi (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sim1rae (talk) 20:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Clippers21 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Clippers21 (talk) 22:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... very informative and instructional.
- What I didn't like
... nothing to complain about.
- What was missing
... nothing, everything was helpful.
- What was unnecessary
... all information was pertinent and useful.
--Kmkammer (talk) 22:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC)kmkammer
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Hgri7297 (talk) 00:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Good basic description
- What I didn't like
Not much info per page
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mblick (talk) 00:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia TrainingHaley thil (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- I liked how everything was thoroughly explained and videos showed the steps necessary for tasks.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't like how it wanted us to open up another page and do step-by-step tasks on our own. I would rather do the steps as part of the training process.
...
- What was missing
- I cannot think of anything that was missing because it seemed to cover the general basics of Wiki editing and article submitting that I would need to know for my level of experience.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I cannot think of any unnecessary parts of the training.
...
--Haley thil (talk) 01:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Chooseychunk (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Chooseychunk (talk) 02:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I loved how well the way to use wikipedia was explained. Definitely made me excited to use it
- What I didn't like
... I liked everything- orientation answered all my questions
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... N/A
--Moiselle4dreaa (talk) 02:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The tutorial videos helped by visually showing the steps you need to take to do certain editing techniques.
- What I didn't like
...There was nothing I didn't like about the training.
- What was missing
...There should be some more editing techniques explained.
- What was unnecessary
...There was multiple slides on help options, but I think a simple list is all that is needed to get the options across.
--Lihini 2 (talk) 03:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dxiao12 (talk) 03:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked how easy and straightforward the training process was.
- What I didn't like
... I didn't find anything that I didn't like.
- What was missing
... Possibly interactive examples.
- What was unnecessary
... N/A
--Emilridesbikes (talk) 04:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Megan marks (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Megan marks (talk) 06:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The variety of available lengths
- What I disliked
...Not much
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
--Melmunro (talk) 07:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hsinying12 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...I like how it has videos going through how Wikipedia works especially on the things that we may need to watch out for. I also like how editors can give each other barnstars, to me I think it's a great way to encourage people to keep on going and make Wikipedia better.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Hsinying12 (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
... Not that I didn't like it, but remembering how to bold words and such will take a bit of practicing and getting use to -the coding functions in general.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Omnisays (talk) 12:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Arjayintia (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Arjayintia (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Emilyspierer (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Emilyspierer (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
how to edit, more techniques on how to edit and where to find articles to edit ...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ag715 (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Feedback[edit]
- What I liked
- The details.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Christy ashworth (talk) 17:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--110.33.212.70 (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Acho5057[edit]
- What I liked
N/A
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N?A
--110.33.212.70 (talk) 18:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jboudr6 (talk) 19:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...User friendly, lots of links for help.
- What I didn't like
...It didn't have any ways to try-as-you-go, very basic.
- What was missing
...Maybe active tutorials along the way? As in, a practice edit, a practice run at making a stub, etc. It's hard to remember all the info that was presented in such a condensed intro.
- What was unnecessary
...
--ClaireLA (talk) 22:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Jazzydee c (talk)feedback[edit]
- What I liked
...it was short and to the point
- What I didn't like
...the videos kept screwing up
- What was missing
...not much
- What was unnecessary
...the videos
--Jazzydee c (talk) 23:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Mayrapm128 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
I felt that the orientation was very useful. Also well organized in modules which made it user friendly.
- What I didn't like
Felt like it was a bit repetitive, but maybe some people need these guidelines explicitly.
- What was missing
n/a
- What was unnecessary
n/a
--Mayrapm128 (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Dhuha.Yasmin (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Instructions were easy to follow, and the training covered everything.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dhuha.Yasmin (talk) 00:45, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
GlennHanson (talk)Very Insightful[edit]
- What I liked
... This introduction was very insightful into the workings of wikipedia, it has reassured me that it is just not any person can change a Wikipedia article for any reason without viable backing.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... Maybe an outline to the invention and development of how to write a Wikipedia entry. Also, examples of how an article changes over a period time.
- What was unnecessary
...
--GlennHanson (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Blaketheridge (talk) 04:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Renatofrart (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Renatofrart (talk) 12:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- it taught me a lot about Wikipedia I did not know already. I also learned that it helped me to learn about how to use Wikipedia and the functions and areas I need to become familiar with for this class project.
...
- What I didn't like
- I found it to be educational towards helping me learn about how to navigate around this website.
...
- What was missing
- I do not think it was missing anything because I am just learning about Wikipedia so I do not know much about this website.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I think everything was necessary to go with learning about how to use this website and everything was listed or shown for me to know what to do.
...
--Dlaneader (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the information I learned from the orientation will help better my search for articles or materials necessary for research.
- What I didn't like
...It was a bit time consuming reading the modules.
- What was missing
...Nothing was missing what so ever.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing was unnecessary.
--Josh13tx (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that it was concise. I also liked the video tutorials on editing
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mmanuba (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very easy to follow along. I liked that it didn't provide direct instructions like "You must bold the word Apple Pie and link it to the wikipage on 'Pies'", but rather, left it up to me to play around on my sandbox after finding out how to do each step.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--MinnieVW (talk) 02:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Clear information with supportive videos.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... Basic try-outs as you go along.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Gbolduc88 (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Thorough.
- What I didn't like
...Repetitive.
- What was missing
...Nothing comes to mind.
- What was unnecessary
...The background module. But it's optional, so that's a moot point.
--ARoble12 (talk) 04:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
WRIT 1001 Mengchan Bao[edit]
- What I liked
All four of these modules are easy to read and understand.
- What I didn't like
NO
- What was missing
NO
- What was unnecessary
NO
--Mbao6208 (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...how it teaches you methods of editing on Wikipedia. Most of this I wouldn't have known before this training session
- What I didn't like
... Adding the references was a little bit difficult to understand because the instructions weren't clear enough, especially when there was an error.
- What was missing
... more information on how the sandbox works
- What was unnecessary
...the instructions on using the forwards and backwards button. I thought it was obvious that people would click the button for the next page and if they wanted to go back, click the back arrow.
--Icha2663 (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Writweek8 (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The fact that they show you how to edit within other articles cleanly.
...
- What I didn't like
- Some of the information was cluttered.
...
- What was missing
- N/A
...
- What was unnecessary
- A little too much information was given, and a bit redundant.
...
--BenjaminSzalma (talk) 19:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Pknopka (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Text was concise and easy to follow.Liked the links to the cheatsheet and other shortcuts.
...
- What I didn't like
- Not crazy about the vids.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Castabile (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Easily understand information (not a chunk of information on the page)
- What I didn't like
some of the videos doesn't work
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ophfifi (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Sidneydgreat (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Very informative
- What I didn't like
Very long
- What was missing
Nothing
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
--Sidneydgreat (talk) 08:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
feedback[edit]
- What I liked
Easy to read and understand
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dariabarraza (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mmb524 (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The videos were amazing and helped the most!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Ret41 georgetown (talk) 01:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Comprehensive
...
- What I didn't like
- The layout out of the page and having to click next page as opposed to having all the info on fewer more detailed pages. A little too detailed.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jbey8276 (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Wafa Al-Ali (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... The fact that is comprehensive. I liked the idea of the tea house and Wikilove tools
- What I didn't like
... It is too much instructions that might be difficult to remember
- What was missing
on spot exercises for us to test our understanding of instructions given
- What was unnecessary
nothing was unnecessary --Wafa Al-Ali (talk) 19:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Awil236 (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.211 (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
TimothyJB.me (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--TimothyJB.me (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very detailed steps that anyone can follow straight after the explanation.
- What I didn't like
Too much information or steps made me bored and gradually lose interest.
- What was missing
Examples of how other students or people posted their article
- What was unnecessary
Too much of basic knowledge
--220.239.252.49 (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--SamanthaGroth (talk) 08:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
What I liked: Point form was easy to breeze through
What I didn't like: It was a touch long and a bit not to the point
What was missing: nothing really, well covered.
What was unnecessary: Effective responses? really? no honey no.
- What I liked
...informative
- What I didn't like
... too long
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.211 (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jolley1 (talk) 08:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Sallen5413 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Fantastic introduction to getting started in Wikipedia!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sallen5413 (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--As0395 (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I really like the how the orientation take us go through everything about Wikipedia. ...
- What I didn't like
However, I would like to know if there is a full version of video about the entire orientation. ...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Oak0b19 (talk) 23:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.211 (talk) 23:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very interesting to know how wikipedia works
- What I didn't like
...too long to read
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... everything mentioned was useful --129.78.233.212 (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very interesting to know how wikipedia works
- What I didn't like
...too long to read
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... everything mentioned was useful --129.78.233.212 (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... informative
- What I didn't like
... lengthy
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jrmac2013 (talk) 02:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
I thought it was very helpful. It gave me a basic overview of how to get started.
--Brittyc (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How understandable all the information was
- What I didn't like
... Most of the videos did not work
- What was missing
... More fun and interactive information
- What was unnecessary
...the extra information
--Ufan7921 (talk) 04:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Turnj (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Barker4767 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...Very informative, thoroughly covered requirements
- What I didn't like
...Orientation length, could possibly condense a few things
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the advanced methods, these could be in a separate, more advanced orientation for interested Wikipedians
--Barker4767 (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Training[edit]
- What I liked
- It was interesting to learn how to edit wikipedia
- What I didn't like
- I think it should have been more interactive rather than just copious amounts of words. perhaps a few questions here and there
- What was missing
I dont think anything critical was missing it covered all the basics (i.e plagiarism, how to add on, edit)
- What was unnecessary
I think it was all vital to understand
Henrychim888 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- Concise, comprehensive
- What I didn't like
- Some parts are self explanitory
- What was missing
- An easy to watch video that goes through everything (in one video)
- What was unnecessary
- Most of the UI explainations
--Henrychim888 (talk) 13:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Wikipedia training use very easy vocabulary. Therefore, understanding it is very simple. Videos and additional summaries are very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Gjd31 (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very informative
- What I didn't like
... A lot of videos
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... The first page of each module --Dontkillkennny (talk) 19:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
short, good starting point
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
I guess I'll find that out when editing
- What was unnecessary
...
--CaroEhr (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The video tutorials were very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kelia081 (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the dot points made it very clear
- What I didn't like
... too much information to take in, should be less long
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... too much info
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 23:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Response to Training[edit]
- What I liked
... Simply step-by-step structure
- What I didn't like
... Overload of information, too much reading
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... Amount of information
--Harukasp21 (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Clear and easy to understand structure.
...
- What I didn't like
- Less text heavy
...
- What was missing
- Pictures
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The useful and detailed information given in some steps
- What I didn't like
...The unnecessary detail on some of the steps
- What was missing
...Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Some information or demonstrations that would not make much difference to whether it was there or not.
--Adat8822 (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Sierrasuen (talk)response to training[edit]
- What I liked
...it was clear, set out in dot points, very detailed
- What I didn't like
...it was too long
- What was missing
...not much
- What was unnecessary
...not sure
--Sierrasuen (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was in very detail and concise languages
- What I didn't like
...there are few repeated steps
- What was missing
...what responsibility for composer and editor about the task ?
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
--129.78.233.210 (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Julius2525 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Julius2525 (talk) 00:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Every description that allowed me to understand more of creating a descriptive article here on Wikipedia. Delivering every aspects of being a Wikipedian.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Screen4writers13 (talk) 01:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos are very helpful in clarifying many concepts! The training is well organized and is very easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
...Just too much information...I need time to digest them all...
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
--Ciel0525 (talk) 02:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kpervaiz (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--KJ (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Provided easy, straight forward information and instructions
- What I didn't like
Not interactive enough
- What was missing
More interactions
- What was unnecessary
Too many pages in each module
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 04:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.210 (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.211 (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Stephen Alford (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Gsswann (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very detail
- What I didn't like
...too long
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
--In629 (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 06:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was pretty short, and very easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
It was a little bit repetitive.
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--129.78.233.210 (talk) 06:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--We Were Promised Jetpacks (talk) 06:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 07:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Bakemono123 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bakemono123 (talk) 09:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The topic on editing and advanced editing
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Carizza4 (talk) 10:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC) carizza4
- What I liked
... The simplicity of the layout. It was easy to read and understand.
- What I didn't like
... The instructions were a little difficult to follow.
- What was missing
... More than one example.
- What was unnecessary
... The videos. --Sye93 (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Adproximumconkate (talk)Orientation[edit]
- What I liked
...The information was presented in a readable way
- What I didn't like
...Too much information, and this editing process is just hostile. No me gusta. If this thing is really intended for everyone to use, why is it so time consuming and non-intuitive to edit a page?
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...If this is for students, you don't have to bear down so heavily on the "neutrality" points. If it's for the general public though, I totally understand why you went the way you did.
--Adproximumconkate (talk) 12:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Sam van der Swaagh (talk)The orientation was very helpful.[edit]
- What I liked
...The modules were concise and clear. I had a sense of the big picture while reading the modules.
- What I didn't like
...I did not like that I had to have two windows open in order to simultaneously read and practice in the sandbox. Perhaps in the future Wikipedia could incorporate a more integrated experience between the sandbox and the training modules.
- What was missing
...excises within the training, perhaps.
- What was unnecessary
...I cannot think of it.
--Sam van der Swaagh (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Sam van der Swaagh
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jaygu21 (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--FtPA11 (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The small sections under each module. Reading page by page was easy to follow. The videos attached, and extra resources are also helpful.
- What I didn't like
... Having the page numbers of each module on the top right.. it is helpful to keep track, but it also makes me aware of how long more I have to go.. If someone is doing this training for the sake of it, then they will probably absorb more content in the first few pages than the last.
- What was missing
... Maybe relevant screenshots should be included instead. Some people might not have the time to watch the helpful videos, hence including some screenshots from it will be good.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing that I am aware of.
--On9joy (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dtol6207 (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was fast and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
Nothing as far as I'm concerned.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
--Rm1587 (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--JoKondos (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
the easy to understand slides
- What I didn't like
maybe to many slides, could have just had automatic videos
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
all was relative --Roshmer (talk) 03:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Naomiwright (talk)[edit]
(For UOregon HC224: Feminist Science Fiction)
- What I liked
Very user friendly; showed me how to edit manually with code, but also gave "easy" versions with the new beta tools. Videos were very helpful. Will be a good resource for future to use as articles are created.
- What I didn't like
Some images weren't really illustrative/helpful, but that's ok. (Columns in the five pillar section)
- What was missing
Perhaps some info-graphics in addition to videos.
- What was unnecessary
n/a
--Naomiwright (talk) 06:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I have no problems with training. It covered virtually all that was needed to know before practical activities. All the videos were very explicit a and enhanced the learning process.
- What I didn't like
...The training was too long, and I wounder if one is expected to know everything that was covered in the topics, or if proficiency was to acquired with both training and practice.
- What was missing
...There was nothing missing in the overall training.
- What was unnecessary
...I believe students may profit more if the modular instructions go hand in hand with practice! --Wenwatata (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The clear instructions and language in each of the sections. The instructional videos were very helpful for me to understanding the context.
- What I didn't like
Most pages were well done, there was not anything I didn't like although the pictures I felt were not needed and could be replaced with better informative images or removed.
- What was missing
A variety of style and useful images to make to the information more engaging.
- What was unnecessary
Most of the pictures were unnecessary as they provide nothing informative. The pictures were just there for a 'colour' effect to make the pages less dull.
--Hongus1 (talk) 01:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Eranniko (talk) 03:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Damien132435 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
alot
- What I didn't like
It was very long
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
most of it
--Damien132435 (talk) 03:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I learn alot of new things about wikipedia!
...
- What I didn't like
- there were so much to remember..
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Schhuoy (talk) 04:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The briefness of each point- made it easy to understand. ...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--RJasmina (talk) 06:53, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
Navigation worked well. My time was respected.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Davegert (talk) 10:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was a great introduction toWikipedia :)Ria99 (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I didn't like
... Nothing :)Ria99 (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What was missing
... Nothing :)Ria99 (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing :)Ria99 (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC) --Ria99 (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
99.232.47.2 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--99.232.47.2 (talk) 01:04, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Wangyue1405 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...very clearly stated
- What I didn't like
...some video doesn't work
- What was missing
...more practical exercises
- What was unnecessary
...picture with conversation
--Wangyue1405 (talk) 01:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Tanha Mahmud (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
The video tutorials.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Tanha Mahmud (talk) 03:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--175.39.12.241 (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--KerzNeuroscience (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The orientation was very informative. I found it very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kycarp20 (talk) 03:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Binsanity21 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Binsanity21 (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lauren Taylor 455 (talk) 04:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
JTRobinson (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- How extensive the training was in explaining how to navigate the webpage.
...
- What I didn't like
- There wasn't anything in particular I didn't like.
...
- What was missing
- Everything was covered.
...
- What was unnecessary
- It was all necessary to learning about Wikipedia.
...
--JTRobinson (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The embedded videos were quite useful in further explanations. Each section was covered in a brief, yet in an utmost informative manner. Of which, I found to be very helpful in the orientation process.
- What I didn't like
There is little to nothing that I disliked about the orientation.
- What was missing
I do not recall any specific information about technical editing that i may have missed. Everything seemed pristine and clear.
- What was unnecessary
Sometimes I found the pictures just slightly unnecessary, but that follows on personal opinion and as such should not be a reason to take the pictures out. After all, what may not be necessary to me, might be of great use to others. --RiffMusicPony (talk) 17:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Was informative, and helped me understand better
- What I didn't like
- Nothing
- What was missing
- More content
- What was unnecessary
...
--Igenes (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Jirwin1097 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jirwin1097 (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Editing module and videos
- What I didn't like
...none
- What was missing
...none
- What was unnecessary
...none
--Kchung325 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
[edit]
- What I liked
...The videos
- What I didn't like
...The length, Shorter than an hour would have been nice
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...The text, I think the whole training could have been a video
--Navitad (talk) 23:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... brief
- What I didn't like
... few screenshots
- What was missing
... example of article being created from scratch--maybe in form of a video
- What was unnecessary
... long videos --DMTDVP (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Languyen94 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- I liked all the video tutorials that showed step-by-step instructions on how to code and whatnot. It was a lot more useful than the actual description written about the certain tools in Wikipedia.
...
- What I didn't like
- I can't really think of anything I didn't like. I think there should be more videos on all the codes just so people can get a feel for all the things that can be done in a Wiki article starting with the things that are most used down to the things that a lot of people don't really need in editing or making an article of their own.
...
- What was missing
- Video on other basic codes like italicizing words. Although there are buttons that will insert the code that you need in there for you, I think that showing how to manually insert the code could be less time consuming in some cases. Like making something bolded, I don't want to stop what I'm writing to go in and click the bolding tool. I'd rather just enter the myself.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I can't think of anything that is unnecessary. Everything in the tutorial is useful.
...
--Languyen94 (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... great speed, informative but not overwhelming
- What I didn't like
... lot's of pages
- What was missing
... don't know yet :)
- What was unnecessary
... n/a
--AjoneWiki (talk) 02:49, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
74.100.64.57 (talk)orientation[edit]
- What I liked
... how it showed the vairety of help and support it has
- What I didn't like
...didnt give me alot of examples to really understand by myself to start an article
- What was missing
... a full page example showin step by step
- What was unnecessary
...the videos that show a computer screen but not close enough to understand little by little. went to fast to read it
--74.100.64.57 (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Olivialewis94 (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was very informative and the videos were helpful
- What I didn't like
...Not much of anything
- What was missing
...Not sure
- What was unnecessary
...I think it was all helpful, so necessary
--Enejill (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dclow87 (talk) 06:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
orientation eval[edit]
- What I liked
- I liked how informative it was. Very good instruction and explanations on how to do things on Wiki.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't like how long it was. The explanations could have been summed up a bit.
...
- What was missing
- I felt it was missing more videos. I am more of a visual and experimental learner.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I thought it was all very informative information, I just didn't like how in-depth it got there in a few parts. It lost my interest very fast and I don't feel I got much out of it in the long sections of instruction.
...
--Lacyk4 (talk) 07:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I enjoyed the step-to-step process that allowed me to learn about the format. The description of sandbox was also helpful
- What I didn't like
...The formatting process seems difficult to master and I may need to go back a couple times to memorize these specific aspects.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...The constant reminder to not attack others on this site.
--Cmeagher (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...understanding what it's like to edit on Wiki
- What I didn't like
...a little to long
- What was missing
...everything was there to teach the audience what was necessary
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kimta1009 (talk) 21:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Concise and informative tutorial.
- What I didn't like
...Too much to click on and high potential to close the pop-up window. I would consider one long video as opposed to text.
- What was missing
...More information on the wiki code and how to use shortcuts.
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
--CPBoyer (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Neurobuddy1 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... Dense
- What I didn't like
... Video was more informative than written notes
- What was missing
... Concise summary
- What was unnecessary
... Almost everything was good
--Neurobuddy1 (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)neurobuddy1
- What I liked
...The training was straightforward, and succinct.
- What I didn't like
...n/a
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...n/a
--Kmcveety (talk) 05:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It gave a basic understanding of how to get started and gave links to other resources that expand on these basic concepts.
- What I didn't like
...It was all fine.
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...The videos
--Eowen2 (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the citation aspect
- What I didn't like
... it was not detailed
- What was missing
... how to create paragraphs
- What was unnecessary
...
--Teehuns (talk) 22:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--QuintinK (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Mkhalifa503 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... Very streamlined, goals/learning objectives were outlined at the beginning.
- What I didn't like
... None
- What was missing
... None
- What was unnecessary
... None --Mkhalifa503 (talk) 03:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was very informative. Detailed and simple instructions
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing.
--Ccha5390 (talk) 03:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was in sections and makes it easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
You have to go through all of it if you forget something
- What was missing
Nothing really, I don't remember seeing how to make hyperlinks.
- What was unnecessary
All of it was good to know.
--Lauren Taylor 455 (talk) 01:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
14.200.17.98 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--14.200.17.98 (talk) 03:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
A.Kate_Fritsch: Good Intro[edit]
- What I liked
It gave a basic introduction of how to edit on Wikipedia, why, and what the community norms are.
- What was missing
It would have been nice to have more about wikicoding earlier on, so when I was playing around with my sandbox, I could try that out.
A.Kate Fritsch (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... brevity
- What I didn't like
... not enough details on coding
- What was missing
... formatting instructions
- What was unnecessary
... how to make my page a featured page
--Aturn4000 (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked how the training was organized into four different sections with various subsections.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't like that some of the subsections had videos that didn't run.
...
- What was missing
- I think there could be a more thorough, basic introduction to formatting the work we put in the sandbox, and a more detailed explanation of how we format when we do edits.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I thought all of the information was useful.
...
--Haileychamberlain (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...simple and well laid out information very helpful for a new editor.
- What I didn't like
...Some formatting issues on my machine though I have no idea how to fix that myself and I imagine it would be near impossible for it to appear correct on everyones different machines globally. Did not affect readability.
--Richardccramer (talk) 07:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The video tutorials were very helpful
- What I didn't like
... The whole editing process is very complicated
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Gshum24 (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
AustinP.503 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
Concise, lots of examples.
- What I didn't like
The videos were a bit long.
- What was missing
A little more info about how to avoid edit wars.
- What was unnecessary
...
--AustinP.503 (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I really appreciated being told the basics of how to edit a Wiki page. Whenever I've edited before, I've had to look things up or try to imitate what the rest of the article's edit page did.
- What I didn't like
... It seemed a little long for how little content there seems to be.
- What was missing
... I would have appreciated more video and visual descriptions. I think that it would have added to my general attitude on completing the training.
- What was unnecessary
...
--Gmanfive (talk) 19:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I enjoyed thinking about some of the politics of Wikipedia editing. It is reassuring to know that there is an effort to make Wikipedia fair.
- What I didn't like
...I wish the tutorial could have been interactive somehow, like by having users answer multiple choice questions about what they learned.
- What was missing
- How can Wikipedia be used for real research? How can it be cited? How can we find the sources that articles cite?
...
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing!
--Gabeechka (talk) 20:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Eliza Pearce (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...The videos were helpful.
- What I didn't like
...Too much use of wiki___ terms/titles.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Eliza Pearce (talk) 00:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
jmwisebird (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--jmwisebird (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Amy.E.Jones (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...Clear and easy to follow instructions that provided me with a starting point to start editing wikipedia pages for my class project.
- What I didn't like
...too many links to different pages. It would be great to just have the nutshell for that page in parenthesis instead of the link!
- What was missing
...Interactive editing in the tutorial would be helpful so that the user does not have to open up another page.
- What was unnecessary
...I found all of the content in the tutorial helpful!
--Amy.E.Jones (talk) 07:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
The amount of content per page was perfect.
- What I didn't like
The outlining was a bit extensive.
- What was missing
More advanced editing functions. Also, I would be interested to learn Wikipedia's content guidelines for mathematical concepts. These pages generally befuddle me despite my substantial, relative to the general public, mathematical background.
- What was unnecessary
The outlining was a bit extensive.
--Mahkahw (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos made the training easier to follow and understand
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mccull44 (talk) 02:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Justinthojar (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
it showed me that wiiki can actually be used as a resource
- What I didn't like
it was generally pretty good. more videos
- What was missing
maybe something a bit more interactive
- What was unnecessary
i wouldnt say anything was uneccesary
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Drea23 31 (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--169.235.165.195 (talk) 22:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Bmarz436 (talk) 01:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Rptseng (talk) 04:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sadem91 (talk) 18:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very easy to use, made me interested in participating in Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Hennings.iheid (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- the videos are a helpful tool
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
- examples would be wirthwhile, especially on good/bad articles
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lauracur (talk) 13:14, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...efficient and helpful videos, organized structure of the modules
- What I didn't like
...redundant text when videos are available
- What was missing
...can't think of anything at the moment
- What was unnecessary
...same as previous answer
--Peabunny (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos were thorough and clear
...
- What I didn't like
- I'd like to learn more about talk pages
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Florenceandree (talk) 10:13, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Tahnidwyer (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- Interesting seeing how Wikipedia works.
...
- What I didn't like
- Layout was not ideal.
...
- What was missing
- A longer video describing everything in detail.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Tahnidwyer (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The easiness of following along with the overwhelming material
...
- What I didn't like
...n/a
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
... n/a --AndreeaColvin (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The easiness of following along with the overwhelming material
...
- What I didn't like
...n/a
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
... n/a --AndreeaColvin (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...brief, concise, useful
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Nelipeuch (talk) 11:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Zach Blount (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... The videos were very helpful and provided necessary variation to the teaching methods.
- What I didn't like
... It was unclear at first if I should have created an account before or after the training. In the end though, it did not matter, as all of my questions were answered.
- What was missing
... N/A
- What was unnecessary
... N/A
--Zach Blount (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Bucillag234 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- The visuals/videos.
...
- What I didn't like
- Longer than I expected, but still direct.
...
- What was missing
- More information on editing heading/sub-heading
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
--Bucillag234 (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It provided the quick and dirty in text form and a more elaborate video. There were links in case we wanted more information It suggested we create things along the way like a sandbox
- What I didn't like
... Some parts were redundant, like when suggesting how to deal with other authors and being civil. A lot of it is also common sense.
- What was missing
... I won't know what information was missing until I start working on creating a wikipedia page and realize I don't know how to do something. It was pretty comprehensive.
- What was unnecessary
... I think the training could be more specialized, for example if we are only looking to create an article (for class purposes) and not edit others articles then that was unnecessary information. --Paula Marques-Pinheiro (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Algillespy (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...fairly straightforward and easy to follow
- What I didn't like
...The videos didn't load
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Algillespy (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos were particularly helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Spgill42 (talk) 00:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...it was clear and concise and very understandable
- What I didn't like
...nothing really. I feel like I'm able to start editing now and have a good sense of what I need to do
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cmcape (talk) 02:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the videos
- What I didn't like
It was long
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
nothing
--Yeem52 (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... everything
- What I didn't like
... nothing
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
--58.109.81.116 (talk) 23:33, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The video tutorials made the information easier to comprehend.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Oliver92 (talk) 15:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I enjoyed the videos, it made the orientation very easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
...Everything was pretty good, other than the "Happy Editing" at the end of the majority of each of the videos started to get a little much for me.
- What was missing
...I am still a little confused on how watchlists and talk pages work, so more examples within the videos of people communicating with each other would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
...Everything was pretty necessary. Thanks!
--ChristinaYlee (talk) 15:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Jenniisaac (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... How informative the process was.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...Some of the videos didn't run correctly.
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the material was a little redundant.
--Jenniisaac (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--KBPsych (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Jabrumbaugh (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jabrumbaugh (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Sfurie101 (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Albertb123 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
The amount of information seemed just about right. Like a scandalous dress, enough material not to spoil the surprise, but short enough to keep things interesting.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... --Albertb123 (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Allong22 (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Dadukes23 (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked that the information was informative and in-depth, it wasn't rushed or hurried.
- What I didn't like
- If possible, you might consider adding an example page where new editors must actually try doing those edits themselves on a practice article.
- What was missing
- Really nothing I can see.
- What was unnecessary
- Not very much.
--Joe Kearns8507 (talk) 12:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked understanding the pillars of wikipedia and what they stand for. I also thought the videos were very relatable.
...
- What I didn't like
- I enjoyed learning about the editing techniques but I was overwhelmed with all of the information.
...
- What was missing
- a possible overview page of all the editing techniques.
- What was unnecessary
- I feel that the training section gave a great overview of how to be a successful wikipedia editor!
...
--Kaseymoo1 (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was comprehensive.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Telacks (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Succinct, easy to follow
- What I didn't like
... Nothing!
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cazee16 (talk) 14:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kakemp (talk) 16:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--WJschmidt (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
started from the bare minimum basics
- What I didn't like
I wish there was more multimedia, not just links to YouTube
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Maschone (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Coello (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Laurenhan (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos were very helpful and descriptive.
- What I didn't like
...I did not like the fact that some articles needed clarification.
- What was missing
...Nothing was missing from this training.
- What was unnecessary
...there was not anything that was unnecessary.
--Anonymous52813 (talk) 15:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Anonymous52813
Neurobuddy1 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Neurobuddy1 (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- How the videos went in depth and made editing easier to understand.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Lance.leonard.ksu (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Micahdwksu (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
It covered all the necessary topics. ...
- What I didn't like
It was a lot of reading. ...
- What was missing
more video explanations. ...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing was. ...
--Micahdwksu (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Atp725 (talk) 22:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Lindsgatesm (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
... I enjoyed the video tutorials
- What I didn't like
... N/A
- What was missing
... N/A
- What was unnecessary
... N/A
--Lindsgatesm (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the step by step editing info, and I also liked the links that showed me what topics still need to be added to.
...
- What I didn't like
- A few of the terms/lingo used was a bit confusing and was a bit lost on me. I am still unsure how to do everything fully.
...
- What was missing
- I think more tutorial videos would have helped greatly.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I think for the most part everything in this training session was useful and necessary.
...
--Ajon164 (talk) 05:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Jamzone123 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
nothing
- What I didn't like
everything
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
everything
--Jamzone123 (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Mcrosson33 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
I thought that the material covered was pretty much all inclusive, and answered all my questions. ...
- What I didn't like
It took me a while to understand how to use all of the features, but I am not very tech-savvy, so that may have just been a personal hurdle. ...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mcrosson33 (talk) 19:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
LaurenSMS4 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...videos were very helpful LaurenSMS4 (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--LaurenSMS4 (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
It's very well organized, and gives the basic groundrules for editing wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
Videos were difficult to watch.
- What was missing
Nothing that I can see at this point. :)
- What was unnecessary
...
--Iieeeric (talk) 16:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Eaamed (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very simplistic and helpful, thank you! Being able to bookmark links and go back to them is tremendously helpful.
- What I didn't like
... There were a few typos that I wanted to point out- the word "be" was left out a couple of times, for instance "can helpful". Just wanted to make someone aware of the typos!
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Frackley (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Tsealy92 (talk) 01:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the videos, it helped me.
- What I didn't like
...There is way too much to remember!
- What was missing
...Maybe a video of someone starting from the beginning to end, idea to actually posting something on wikipedia.
- What was unnecessary
...It was all good, just too much for my old brain to grasp quickly!!
--Napoleon & Jennas Grammy (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very informative. The videos helped.
- What I didn't like
...More interaction.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Meadamo (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the videos which explained the editing process.
- What I didn't like
...There wasn't much, just that the structure was a little confusing at times
- What was missing
...It would have been nice for more of the topics to be covered with videos, or the entire sections to each have a single, longer video
- What was unnecessary
...A little more time was spent on the concepts of good people doing good things to make Wikipedia better. It's a rather simple idea so stating it multiple times felt unnecessary, but I suppose some people need to hear it several times
--Thomas Schwemberger (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Tpkrupa (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked how easy the directions were to follow to becoming a reliable contributor to Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...I didn't like how the videos and multimedia were set up because they did not load correctly.
- What was missing
...All content needed for contributing to Wikipedia was show and is easily accessible whenever needed.
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the information was restated over and over again within each module.
--Dlhousea (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Cmcheer2012 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Cmcheer2012 (talk) 03:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Msnicole90 (talk)Wikipedia Training[edit]
- What I liked
it was very helpful, answered most of my questions. ...
- What I didn't like
... n/a
- What was missing
...Perfect.
- What was unnecessary
...I feel that the training was absolutely perfect.
--Msnicole90 (talk) 04:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to follow guidelines
- What I didn't like
...N/A
- What was missing
...How to add content box question
- What was unnecessary
...N/A --Nmchinch (talk) 06:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Gets me started
- Gives me the rules
- What I didn't like
- Having to remember to right click a link to open a new tab.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
--Joe (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Feedback on the trainingBarahona003 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
...videos were very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...A bit long
- What was missing
...tutorials on how to edit complete articles and add subsections.
- What was unnecessary
...the help section is self explanatory I believe
--Barahona003 (talk) 04:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)