Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Requested move at Talk:Ministry of Foreign Affairs#Requested move 16 February 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ministry of Foreign Affairs#Requested move 16 February 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:China-US Cold War has been nominated for discussion
Category:China-US Cold War has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for First World
First World has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for European Council
European Council has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Requested moves of six country–NATO relations articles at centralized discussion
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Croatia–NATO relations#Requested move 4 April 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. While they are all listed on the project page under requested moves, and it might be more relevant for WikiProject NATO, I thought it was worth a mention as it covers multiple articles. BucketOfSquirrels (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Please see the new draft, Draft:International relations of Wales
Please see this new draft which I have made. There has been some discussion about the scope of the article and the experience of this WikiProject could be utilised.
On a second note, I would like to suggest more clearly defined article naming precedence for non-sovereign countries like Wales, Scotland, Greenland etc. They all have difference of course, but perhaps a precedence of International relations of... would suit? Could we add this to the WikiProject project page?
Thanks for your time. Titus Gold (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like there is a bit of a naming precedent for non-sovereign countries: the articles for Jersey, Guernsey, and Isle of Mann all use External relations of... exceptionally; but Faroe Islands, Hong Kong, Macau, Greenland, Niue, Rojava, etc, etc uses Foreign relations of.... I prefer the name Foreign relations of Wales, matching the mostly followed precedent for non-sovereign countries, unless there is a reason not to. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 13:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Would you mind adding to the discussion at Draft talk:International relations of Wales? Thanks again Titus Gold (talk) 00:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- At risk of forking discussion elsewhere, I would point out that terms like "country" are easily equivocated on, or at east the term does not completely capture the rich range of difference in arrangements between each. Denmark administers Faroe and Greenland in a different manner from the UK, and significantly allows them to conduct foreign relations to make international treaties on areas that lie within the powers of their governments. They thus have treaties and FTAs and some diplomatic representation. Hong Kong and Macau are separate customs territories that again require treaties and play a role in the WTO etc. Niue acts as an independent state in foreign policy despite having a shared head of State with New Zealand and being New Zealand citizens etc. Titus Gold wants to write about the Foreign relations of Wales, but the UK is a unitary state that has devolved government with reserved powers. It is quasi federal but not federal. Wales cannot make international treaties, nor create diplomatic missions. What it does have is an international strategy, which is primarily about trade, tourism and raising the profile of Wales on the world stage. This is not foreign policy.
- It would be an error to attempt to create a one size fits all title policy here. Moreover this is now the third place this question has been raised as it has already been discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales#Notification of a draft which has since been published Foreign relations of Wales, and now also on the article talk page. My suggestion is that this WikiProject should decline to assert a new precedent to attempt to resolve a content dispute on a different page. You are, of course, all welcome to discuss the issue on the draft article talk page. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Would you mind adding to the discussion at Draft talk:International relations of Wales? Thanks again Titus Gold (talk) 00:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
For quality reviews in Transnational authoritarianism
Sorry for leaving the messages for discuss issues on Transnational authoritarianism about orginal reaserch problem,as the local memmber suggest it should geting WIKIPROJECT involved
The party in the case is well known in zhwiki communities for long of violatimg rules and acting like Wolf warrior,that keep on ideological battles and conflicts for no end with anyone against it. Those matters could be comfirmed by other memmbers in zhwiki communities if they could well defend the complicated annoying and unwanted contacts, attacks, intimidation from this user.
I would be ok for local professional memmbers to assist the topics,but as I have reported locally,the pattern of the user could make anyone involing the processes suffer,I suggest the parties of communties should holding enough strong mental powers for the matters. Longway22 (talk) 10:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Preparatory Committee for an Arms Trade Treaty#Requested move 6 May 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. EggRoll97 (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback and Review requried: UK-Pakistan Judicial Protocol on Children Matters (2003)
Hi there - an article that I created UK-Pakistan Judicial Protocol on Children Matters (2003) is in need of a feedback and review. If anyone is interested in this topic area I would greatly appreciate some more eyes on this. 147.188.245.156 (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
When is international migration defining
when is international migration defining? I have some theories here. My starting po8nts are I think that unless it is a clear move from x to y, it is better to call someone say a British emigrant and an immigrant to Greece, if they lived a year or more in Switzerland and Romania in the interim, than to try to put them in a British emigrant to Greece Category when the middle is fuzzy. I am not sure exactly how to determine when the middle becomes defining and when they are an expat and when an immigrant. If they lived in Switzerland 20 years and wrote 3 or their 7 published books during that time clearly, but most cases are less clear.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:International sanctions during the Venezuelan crisis#Requested move 29 June 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:International sanctions during the Venezuelan crisis#Requested move 29 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for NATO
NATO has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Rfc on Country Comparison charts/tables
- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Should we remove or keep country comparison charts/tables on bilateral relations articles?
An example being Russia–United States relations, which is the first section of the article after the lead. I am rather neutral on this issue, but I can see arguments for keeping and removing. While there is information that compares and contrasts information between both nations, it seems like it belongs more in like a world fact book and much of the information on there doesn't really seem to fit the overall topic of bilateral relations. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging LibStar and Lollipoplollipoplollipop who commented from a previous short discussion last year. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't support country comparisons because I don't see how they are meaningful in terms of bilateral relations. One country being bigger in area than the other doesn't add value, or other aspects such as currency used or who the leader is. I support Wikicleanerman's statement
seems like it belongs more in like a world fact book and much of the information on there doesn't really seem to fit the overall topic of bilateral relations.
. LibStar (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC) - I support removing them. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 14:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't support country comparisons because I don't see how they are meaningful in terms of bilateral relations. One country being bigger in area than the other doesn't add value, or other aspects such as currency used or who the leader is. I support Wikicleanerman's statement
- In general, these should be removed. They're a collection of randomly accrued stats. There are cases where country comparisons are useful, and these are when some comparison is commented upon by a few reliable sources that note its impact on some aspect of bilateral relations. However, these cases should produce information that is limited and specific, as well as in context. (Looking at the specific example of Russia–United States relations, they also clearly promote WP:OR. The "Economic alliance" and "Military alliance" rows are nonsense.) CMD (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It should be an article-by-article decision. Summoned by bot. In some cases, the information is fascinating. While I wouldn't put the table as high in the article as it is, the table in Russia–United States relations is very interesting because the relative military might of these two powers is a major focus of international relations in the last year. If you had the same table with the same rows in, say, an article on U.S.-Haiti relations, well, that would be weird. At a minimum, it is very hard to support an RfC saying we should delete {thing} from {set of articles} without seeing more than one example in support of the assertion that these are bad and without knowing how many things are we talking about here. Chris vLS (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here's three from France related articles, France–Germany relations, France–Spain relations, France–Russia relations. You have pretty much the same thing as the Russia-U.S. article. Are you saying that it should be kept on more important bilateral relations articles? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Remove. I see little relevance to include comparisons. Without additional context and explanation, it's violating WP:NOTSTATS. SWinxy (talk) 23:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Kill it. Kill it with fire.
- Rationale: WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:REDUNDANTFORK (usually from country infoboxes, prone to going out of date), usually random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps (WP:NOTSTATS).
- Precedents / background discussions include:
- 29 October 2018: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 6#Country comparison sections – Common source for all / most of these cruft sections: User:128.117.10.25.
An anonymous user, 128.117.10.25 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has gone on a spree adding large "Country comparison" tables to articles about bilateral relations. In my opinion, those are redundant, visually distracting and certainly not helpful to readers. I don't think such layout is endorsed by the wikiproject, but bringing the matter here for a broader input. No such user (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I agree that this should cease. The IP user doesn't engage in discussion and merely reverts anybody trying to remove their cruft. Sandstein 22:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- 6 October 2020: Many country comparison sections have already been removed by User:Drmies. Example:
- 6 October 2020: removed from Azerbaijan–Pakistan relations: rm trivia
- 6 October 2020: User talk:Zeex.rice#"Country comparison" in international relations articles: Xeed.rice, I appreciate your work, but I need you to stop adding those comparisons. These statistics and comparisons are not inherently relevant to the subject matter, and those details like capitals and flags and whatnot are really irrelevant. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- 8 October 2020: Talk:Singapore–United States relations#October 2020: Telsho agreed with Drmies to remove "country comparison" sections.
(...) Removing them here would suggest that it's justified to remove them on other articles as well for similar reasons, which obviously would end up in a lot of useful information being removed. Telsho (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I see you removed them as well, I guess there's that. Telsho (talk) 01:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Yep, Telsho, there's that. At least some of those were added by a longterm disruptive editor, they never came with any explanation or argument, and why would we do that in the first place? I mean, the coats of arms and flags, who cares and what is the relevance of it? I've seen comparisons between a country and the EU, where lists of "important cities" are given--for what? I appreciate the idea that we should be consistent--but in this case, the better consistency is to remove that information. BTW I worked on a whole bunch of these articles a decade ago, and that stuff wasn't there at the time. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- 20 October 2020: removed from Russia–United Kingdom relations: not relevant to the article as agreed (removed by Telsho)
- 4 May 2022: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 6#Country comparison tables/charts
(...) Should we start removing these altogether in your view? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
absolutely LibStar (talk) 04:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
I figure we can, but I think we need a wider consensus. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- 10 June 2023: The 7 to 1 Deletion of Comparison of the Turkic states at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Turkic dynasties and countries.
- 19 June 2013: The 12 to 1 Deletion of Comparison of the Baltic states, Comparison of the Benelux countries, Comparison of the Nordic countries at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of the Baltic states. Exchange there:
In many instances these tables are an affront to "summary style", and the duplication of basic country statistics to such articles virtually guarantee they'll be out of date. Draken Bowser (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Agreed. If they mention dates at all, the basic country statistics will be outdated eventually. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Disagree. Most of WP content is going to be outdated. This is a reason for updating pages (and yes, providing dates and references), not deletion. My very best wishes (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
(Note: This user is the only 1 opposing deletion against 12 in favour of deletion at the "Comparison of the Baltic states" AfD)Infoboxes are regularly updated, demographics articles are regularly updated, but those comparison articles/sections? Why bother? Unless we're making some sort of Template:Excerpt construction, so that the contents of comparison tables will always synchronised and up to date, I really don't think it's worth the trouble. And even if we do, we are admitting we are duplicating contents anyway. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- 15 June 2023: User talk:Nederlandse Leeuw/Archive 3#"Comparison".
- Examples to Delete/Remove:
- Arab–Pakistan relations#Comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Sino-Arab relations#Comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Arab League–European Union relations#Organization comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Arab League–Iran relations#Comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Arab League–Russia relations the whole article is another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Lists of the Arab League more random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps, although at least with a non-arbitrary scope.
- Australia–Canada relations#Country comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Canada–United Kingdom relations#Country comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- China–Russia relations#Country comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- China–United States relations#Country comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Germany–Japan relations#Country comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Iran–Israel relations#Country comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Poland–Ukraine relations#Comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Russia–United States relations#Country comparison another random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Russia–Ukraine relations#Country comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Spain–United Kingdom relations#Country comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Switzerland–European Union relations#Comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Turkey–United States relations#Country comparison another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Austria–Germany relations#Country comparison another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Soviet Union–United States relations#Country comparison another random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Anglosphere#Comparing core Anglosphere and Anglosphere#Core Anglosphere table: two more random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps.
- Let's get rid of it, once and for all. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- PS: Germanic-speaking world, Romance-speaking world, Iberophone and Finno-Ugric countries are four other random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps. These four are so egregious that I am going to nominate them for deletion right now, because language family has been repeatedly found to be WP:NONDEFINING for countries, and Comparison of the Turkic states serves as a compelling precedent.
- Ibero-America need not be deleted immediately, but Ibero-America#Countries and population in the Americas is yet another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
- Hispanic America shouldn't be deleted, but it has no fewer than 4 arguably random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps, not all of which may have added value.
- Latin America obviously shouldn't be deleted, but we may well question the added value of the tables in Latin America#Subregions and countries, Latin America#Standard of living, Latin America#Largest cities, Latin America#Religion, Latin America#Size, Latin America#Tourism. Some of these seem excessively detailed and large for a general article, and may simply be moved to a thematic subpage (like, Latin America#Size to Latin American economy). Latin America#World Heritage Sites seems some kind of weird top-10 "competition" between who has the most heritage sites by comparison (through WP:SYNTH). Why should readers care? They are probably wondering which ones there are in Latin America as a whole. This section should probably be replaced by just links to List of World Heritage Sites in South America, List of World Heritage Sites in the Caribbean, List of World Heritage Sites in Central America, and List of World Heritage Sites in Mexico. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 09:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- FYI Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germanic-speaking world. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Update Germanic-speaking world, Romance-speaking world, Romance-speaking Africa, Iberophone and Finno-Ugric countries have now indeed been Deleted. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- FYI Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germanic-speaking world. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Keep with improved guidelines – assuming there are 195 countries, that means a potential ~18,000 articles (195*194)/2) which is presently beyond our capacity to rigorously maintain and keep cruft/OR free. That said, the structured naming would also make it easier to monitor such articles (okay along with tracking categories), as well as for readers interested in this very notable/reasonable topic to expect in a Wikipedia and this amount of articles don't exist either. What we should NOT standardize, is the presumed type of content covered. Sometimes military is covered in secondary sources, sometimes trade/diplomatic relations etc... and just because US/Russia are two super powers, doesn't make two smaller countries non-notable. Instead of debating whether to delete/rescue articles, let's focus on improving the content, whether it's more rigorous sourcing, guidelines on what makes bad cruft (the military comparisons seems to be a common offender) etc..- I misunderstood the RfC. Am neutral/leaning remove about comparison charts. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 13:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- It should be an article-by-article decision. In some cases (see at the bottom of page Anglosphere), such comparisons seem to be just fine. In other cases (like Russia–Ukraine relations), the comparison is interesting and useful, but I would rather keep them as separate standalone list pages, with linking from other pages like "relations" and Russo-Ukrainian war. In other cases they better be removed. And so on. My very best wishes (talk) 22:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Remove as a general rule. The reader is just one click away from finding this info in country articles or two clicks away from lists of countries by any conceivable attribute. The data are often not updated regularly thus misleading the reader. Alaexis¿question? 08:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- It is possible that in individual cases this information can be useful, but as a general rule, no--and I say this because I would like for us to have it as a general rule. Too many articles suffer from this typically overlinked and overfetishized material which often accretes--material with emblems and flags and overlinking, with randomly picked data, and often in the most disruptive and conspicuous of places, such as in this article. I'll add that in many of the articles, it was the work of an LTA operating a variety of IPs from Turkey. Drmies (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Remove as a general rule; this is not inconsistent with article-by-article decisions so long as the justification for inclusion is pressing and valid, which is what article-by-article aims to do in the first place. Making a general rule would head off most of this WP:OR WP:NOTSTATS clutter. Iseult Δx parlez moi 15:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think we can close this RfC as it has run for several weeks and consensus seems clear. LibStar (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think I'll nominate Arab League–Russia relations for Deletion once this RfC is completed, because it consists entirely of another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump. In all other cases, we just need to remove the random entirely/mostly/partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump sections in existing articles, which can otherwise be Kept. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. I'd welcome anyone to remove it despite the automatic removal date by the bot account. It's been almost a month since I started this and the consensus is clear. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Will someone please assess my draft article?
Draft:Vigilant Isles 22 is the link to clink on. StrongALPHA (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Another discussion at Talk:Second Cold War
The matter of the {{globalize}}
tag in the Second Cold War article is discussed. More inputs are welcome there. Link: Talk:Second Cold War#Remove "globalize" tag? George Ho (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Credibility bot
As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to Credibility bot. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at Wikipedia:Vaccine safety and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at WP:CREDBOT. Thanks! Harej (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russian invasion of Ukraine/Archive 1#Requested move 4 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russian invasion of Ukraine/Archive 1#Requested move 4 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge#Requested move 7 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge#Requested move 7 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:National identity#Requested move 12 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:National identity#Requested move 12 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Cold war (term)#Requested move 31 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Cold war (term)#Requested move 31 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Embassy of Country
I've been creating missing disambiguation pages, where several articles share a common prefix with different qualifiers but there's no dab. I've found several embassy prefixes such as Embassy of Afghanistan which has Embassy of Afghanistan, Berlin; Embassy of Afghanistan, Cairo; etc. However, rather than create a dab, it should probably be a redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan. That would match existing redirects such as Embassy of Albania which redirects to List of diplomatic missions of Albania, Embassy of Bolivia which redirects to List of diplomatic missions of Bolivia, etc.
Would these redirects be helpful? If not, should we create something else at these titles?
We do have one dab, Embassy of Nigeria, but it is incomplete and should probably be replaced by a redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Nigeria. Certes (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think the redirects you suggest would be helpful. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done; thanks for the advice. Certes (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Created a draft outline page for the Iran hostage crisis
The page is currently over at Draft:Outline of Iran hostage crisis, for anyone else interested in contributing to this. Parham wiki (talk) 11:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present)#Requested move 7 September 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present)#Requested move 7 September 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Afc submission about the United Nations
Draft:Liechtenstein and the United Nations A.FLOCK (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-10/21. Your contributions would be appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
United States involvement in regime change in Latin America has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. WMrapids (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Deportation of undocumented Afghans from Pakistan#Requested move 5 November 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Deportation of undocumented Afghans from Pakistan#Requested move 5 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —Alalch E. 23:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Global warming controversy
An article that you have been involved in editing—Global warming controversy—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Re: United States cultural diplomacy in Iran
United States cultural diplomacy in Iran requires cleanup of sources (majority of which is not in English) and potentially a rewrite. W9793 (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Request for input on post-Yugoslav-breakup election article naming
We had a discussion relisted at Talk:May 1992 Yugoslavian parliamentary election#Requested move 3 November 2023 that could benefit from the input of people who have knowledge of this topic area, please check it out. --Joy (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Move discussion at Guayana Esequiba
An editor has requested that Guayana Esequiba be moved to Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. --WMrapids (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Move discussion for 2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis
An editor has requested that 2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis be moved to 2023 Guyana–Venezuela crisis, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion.--WMrapids (talk) 03:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
I just created New Pact on Migration and Asylum of the European Union. Any help with expansion would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 21:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Killing of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka#Requested move 18 December 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Killing of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka#Requested move 18 December 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — mw (talk) (contribs) 20:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Bombardment of Yeonpyeong#Requested move 6 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bombardment of Yeonpyeong#Requested move 6 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Houthi involvement in the Israel–Hamas war#Requested move 12 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United States border security concerns#Requested move 23 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Potential enlargement of the European Union#Requested move 30 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Unverified quotes in the "Debates and Discussions" section of "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273"
Suggested change in the relevant page Zlmark (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Request for comments at Spanish West Africa
I'm requesting for comments about the ongoing discussion at Talk:Spanish West Africa#Symbols of Spanish West Africa. I haven't posted at Wikiproject Colonialism because it looks quite inactive. Thanks, Jotamar (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Jewish exodus from the Muslim world#Requested move 26 February 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jewish exodus from the Muslim world#Requested move 26 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute#Requested move 12 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Italian soft power#Requested move 14 March 2024
An editor has requested that Italian soft power be moved to Soft power of Italy, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:United Nations Conciliation Commission#Requested move 7 March 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United Nations Conciliation Commission#Requested move 7 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Killarnee (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Liancourt Rocks#Requested move 7 April 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Liancourt Rocks#Requested move 7 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Remsense诉 13:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:2024 Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus#Requested move 2 April 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus#Requested move 2 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attack on the Azerbaijani Embassy in Tehran#Requested move 7 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:2024 Iranian Strikes in Israel#Requested move 13 April 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Iranian Strikes in Israel#Requested move 13 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:2024 Iranian strikes in Israel#Requested move 14 April 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Iranian strikes in Israel#Requested move 14 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk: List of diplomatic missions in Haiti.
Why are the embassies of Japan and The Bahamas listed as former embassies when they're only temporarily closed due the ongoing crisis in the country? Also, China should be shaded light blue. Port-au-princien (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Postmodernism (international relations)
I believe this should be renamed Poststructuralism (international relations) per the one source supporting the article. Any input, however, would be welcome. (This is not my field, I just noticed the article while working on postmodernism.)
Cheers, Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 15:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 raid on the Mexican embassy in Ecuador#Requested move 17 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2023 Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip#Requested move 11 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The Colourful Discrimination
Hi,No matter what the real colours of Miss Dress mini skirt and her eyebrows I would rather loved her they way she's lovely looking with her smell of her perfume with different mixture of different flowers immediately and she became flower to me since than and never discriminate such a Girl and she'll respect you for your kindness. I'll Vote on general elections to avoid to loss .Amooketsi Global Institutional Black and White Blackout to Knockout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.158.82 (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Postmodernism (international relations)#Requested move 13 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:War in Sudan (2023–present)#Requested move 18 May 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:War in Sudan (2023–present)#Requested move 18 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Input requested for Draft:Taiwan and the United Nations
Hi. You are invited to review and provide feedback for Draft:Taiwan and the United Nations. Hoping to get this draft published soon. Butterdiplomat (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Map of NATO discussed at Talk:Second Cold War
Link: Talk:Second Cold War#Map of NATO. George Ho (talk) 19:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
2023 Canada-India diplomatic row
Please go through the 2023 Canada-India diplomatic row article and review it. Many thanks. 2401:BA80:A383:2A81:8939:A2A6:F86D:94E8 (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Discussion on List of states with limited recognition talk page
There is a discussion regarding the status of removing Armenia, China, Cyprus, Israel, Palestine, and North Korea from Talk:List of states with limited recognition which members of this project would be interested in. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Superpower#Requested move 7 June 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Superpower#Requested move 7 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I've created a draft at Draft:Economic imperialism as this seems to be a big omission in wikipedia's coverage, and was wondering whether anyone would be interested in collaborating to write and structure it, including defining scope and gathering sources. Economic imperialism currently links to Theory of imperialism. Alexanderkowal (talk) 11:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:BRICS#Requested move 23 June 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:BRICS#Requested move 23 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I just started Draft:1945 meeting of Franklin Roosevelt and King Abdul-Aziz. The meeting is seen as the foundation of the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia. Thriley (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Colonization
There is a two-person discussion of the lead sentence at Talk:Colonization. It could use some additional eyes (and fingers). Zerotalk 04:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Unequal treaty#Requested move 6 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Unequal treaty#Requested move 6 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Remsense诉 18:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova#Requested move 26 June 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova#Requested move 26 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
An RFC of interest
Please see Talk:List of genocides#RFC - Inclusion of Gaza genocide. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:United States and the Russian invasion of Ukraine#Requested move 12 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United States and the Russian invasion of Ukraine#Requested move 12 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. JDiala (talk) 21:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Kaspersky bans and allegations of Russian government ties#Requested move 23 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kaspersky bans and allegations of Russian government ties#Requested move 23 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:United States complicity in Israeli war crimes in the Israel–Hamas war#Requested move 24 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United States complicity in Israeli war crimes in the Israel–Hamas war#Requested move 24 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Calls for the destruction of Israel#Requested move 31 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Calls for the destruction of Israel#Requested move 31 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:2024 Haret Hreik airstrike#Requested move 30 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Haret Hreik airstrike#Requested move 30 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Woodrow Wilson has an RfC
Woodrow Wilson has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Martin Van Buren has an RfC
Martin Van Buren has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:List of treaties of China (1689-1949)#Requested move 30 August 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of treaties of China (1689-1949)#Requested move 30 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Gaza genocide/Archive 5#Requested move 7 September 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Gaza genocide/Archive 5#Requested move 7 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 04:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Institutions of the European Union
Institutions of the European Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
There's a discussion at Talk:1948_Palestinian_expulsion_and_flight#RfC_–_In_the_article_section_about_"Haifa",_should_the_following_paragraph_be_added? about whether specific prose attributed to Benny Morris should be added to 1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight. Editors are invited to participate. TarnishedPathtalk 07:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)