User talk:Tonywalton/Dec-2006

[1] Sorry for taking off your legit edit. There's an alert on Template:Wdefcon to watch recent changes, and I just acted too quickly. =( --Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 02:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buffy layer redir Buffy coat[edit]

Damn, damn, damndamndamn :-) Tonywalton | Talk 18:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or, as the philosopher Homer put it; "D'oh!" - Simpson, that is! (aeropagitica) 18:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this[edit]

I understand what you are saying, but I'm not sure how the warning helps you. The main point of being able to see the deletion history (when a page is deleted, the number of previous deletions comes up automatically) is to determine the length of any block, and if, presumably from choice, you're not an admin, I can't see how knowing it's the 4th deletion helps you. User contributions are available anyway, so you can see the track record of a malefactor. Forgive me if I'm being a bit dim, and I've misunderstood your comment thanks, jimfbleak 19:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put you up for admin if you like (will be later though). The problem with warnings it that they take time. At peak vandalism times, I can be deleting/protecting/blocking non-stop, and still barely stemming the tide. Pop-ups are invaluable in saving time viewing pages without opening, but that time would be lost if warnings were put on clear vandalism (I do warn in borderline/pest cases) jimfbleak 06:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for permanently banning the user Irfanhasmit[edit]

this user is a friend of mines but he keeps vandalizing my pages and other pages. He even did a personal attack 2 times! I do not know how to prevent other people from editing my user page so please tell me if you can help protect my page.

Requesting:

Permanent Ban for Irfanhasmit
Protection on my userpage.

--• Storkian • 05:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA nomination[edit]

I've nominated you here. You need to accept and answer the questions for the process to commence. good luck, jimfbleak 15:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good[edit]

I agree...I was working on following these edits, as many are db's for articles that have been vandalized or should instead be afd's. Take a look: [2]. Peace, Kukini 16:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look: [3], you say. Bleugh! I just took a look, now I'll take a proper look... Tonywalton | Talk 16:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was a bit hasty with that one. Seeing so many promotional bios one after another, one tends to get a bit cynical. I'll try to give more benefit of the doubt in future. Akihabara 17:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Great working with you! I am impressed with your style, encouragement and focus. Best, Kukini 17:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed this [4]. You considering it? Let me know if you do. Kukini 18:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Tony; may I wish you the very best of luck in your RfA, and I was delighted to be able to be the first to support you.--Anthony.bradbury 19:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link[edit]

It would have been commonsensical to use WP:SENSE :) (Radiant) 13:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CCGB Thanks[edit]

Good points, Thank you for your valuable input and clarity!! Chrisgo 14:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for amending the page[edit]

Thanks for amending the page Arlington House but I must object to your accusations that I ‘over-write a pre-existing article with a new one’’ if you look at the history (May 2006) the changes had been made along time before I got there - I just updated some info and ONLY removed onelink that appeared to not relate. Thank you anyway. Chrisgo 14:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You did tell me Please do not simply over-write a pre-existing article with a new one when I only Deleted one questionable link and added seven words! I think my language is fair so will not be 'toning down' thank you (I could say the same about you but your free to have your say and I appreciate you feedback).Chrisgo 15:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both you, Tony, and Chris for your help with the Arlington House DAB page. See my more detailed comments on Chris' talk page. --JohnPomeranz 16:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My opposition to your RfA - shifted to neutrality[edit]

Tony, I've shifted my stance on your RfA from 'weak oppose' to 'neutral' and have explained on the RfA page - thanks for taking the time to speak to me on my talk page ... and good luck. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Charming Associates[edit]

Tony, this gets only 7 hits on Google, including the Wiki article. I think it's a spoof. See my comments on User talk:Voncrass regarding his creation of Falar. I'm going to chop it. jimfbleak 16:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony,

With regards to the charming associates, it is not a spoof. They are a very popular band that are currently in the process of being signed. All you have to do is go to their myspace account to see that they are not a spoof. www.myspace.com/charmingassociates

Please will you re-instate this page as soon as possible. I have been to great lengths to research more information about them that I was in the process of adding today before it was unfairly deleted.

Regards.

Cut/pasted to Jimfbleak's talk page. I didn't delete it. Tonywalton | Talk 16:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, jimfbleak 17:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tony,

Would you please have a look on itunes to see the album release, perhaps now you will consider allowing the page back.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.199.65 (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sacramento (MG)[edit]

My mistake , I obvisuly can't tell Spanish from Portugese :-) ShakespeareFan00 17:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The ipswich ripper[edit]

There's been so much total nonsense that at first I thought that page was too. After the guy kept putting it up, and was adding to it, I googled it and found that same ref. you cited, and apologized to the page creator. It is very poorly done, though, as you said. Aleta 20:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started the talk page for the article so any further discussion can take place there. I did tag it as a current event and as needing cleanup. Aleta 20:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't dealt with the AfD before, but if you need my backup on it, let me know. Aleta 20:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link! I have made a comment, suggesting a rew name for the article of something besides "The ipswich ripper", as well as the need for the article to be improved. Also, I will watch this to learn about AfD. Aleta 20:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry[edit]

Hope? You've been here since 2005, you're a newpage patroller, and you still have hope? :p

I suppose the only thing we can do is to keep hoping that eventually, some n00b will read WP:INTRO and become a newbie instead of a 'k3w1 d00d'. It already has a link on the page creation form, so you never know. — Brother Flounder (aka DiegoTehMexican) 22:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Well done on getting 100% support in your RfA! You must be really pleased with that result. I'm sure that a Bureaucrat will be along shortly in order to issue you with a shiny new set of admin tools. If you have any questions about using them then please ask. Have a pint for me when you go off to the pub to celebrate this one! Regards and happy mopping, (aeropagitica) 16:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're a sysop![edit]

Hi, Tonywalton/Dec-2006, Congratulations on Becoming a Sysop!

Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on articles for deletion (provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.

Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»=
PS Please add you name to WP:LA!

=Nichalp «Talk»= 17:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Congratulations, Tony, well earned. jimfbleak 19:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Tony, it's been a long time coming. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 04:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done. Don't go deleting gems such as "Bus Wars" without letting me have a look first! :) Bubba hot ep 08:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Tony. I am delighted to have been your first support after your nominator. You will do well.--Anthony.bradbury 17:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on such a fantastic result, Tony. I wish you all the best with your adminship. Sarah Ewart 11:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the subject itself.

Annie Mae Mitcham is very well known Throughout Central GA as an educator for the under privileged. She has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of her which qualifies for inclusion according to the rules.

There are several entries in this media that are far less notable and news worthy than this subject.

20:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Mitchamz 20:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to all[edit]

I'll not spam talk pages with thanks: Thanks very much to all who contributed to my RfA! It's much appreciated.

Tonywalton | Talk 10:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ipswich murder[edit]

In reply to your message, not a bad idea - why don't you add your ooriginal comment to the section on the talk page I've just started. Apparently I'm getting "stressed" about it according to another ed. Escaper7 11:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I found that out after I had posted and felt a little silly, there is already a mountain of information and I didn't think that it had been documented amongst the "naming" controversy. Barrison 12:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

No problem[edit]

I was impressed by the near-unanimity of the vote - clearly well deserved. I'm sure you'll be a more sensitive editor than me, I seem to upset people with my over-direct approach. I've changed my sig to a scary font now too, MERRY CHRISTMAS, Jimfbleak.talk.14:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

Thanks for the user page revert - looks like they hit quite a few. What did we do?! :D Bubba hot ep 16:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool FC (Montevideo) article[edit]

Thank you for your support on the Talk page of this article. I have been trying to stop this user (he actually uses 3-4 IPs) from making his hoax edits for several weeks now and appreciate any help in stopping him. Best regards. Jogurney 17:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Mae Leonard Mitcham[edit]

These are articles that were featured in the newspaper that serves all of Central Georgia:

Annie Mae Leonard Mitcham

Macon Telegraph - May 12, 2006 - B

Ready place in the motherhood hall of fame If they ever build a motherhood hall of fame - a Cooperstown of hugs, rocking chairs and sweet potato pie - then Annie Mae Mitcham gets my vote on the first ballot. She raised 11 children, 10 of her own and a nephew she adopted. Nine of her kids earned their college degrees, and one son served his country with a career in the Air Force. For years, Annie Mae washed other people's clothes and cleaned other people's houses to help put biscuits on her own table. After...

Please reconsider your position on this matter. 01:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)01:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchamz (talk • contribs)

What can I do to make Annie Mae Leonard Mitcham's entry acceptable for this site?

Please can you explain[edit]

Why you seemed it fit to remove a piece of artwork that I had produced to honour Christophe Duggary? This man was considered a god at Birmingham City FC and your removal of the picture is tantamount to vandalism! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert Johnson (talk • contribs) My picture used a Christian image and you are a wiccan, is this why you removed it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert Johnson (talk • contribs)

I will provide you with evidence for why his picture should be included but first of all have a look at the discussion page on Christophe Duggarys page. Here he is called "this god of a player" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert Johnson (talk • contribs)

Hi I have a couple of quotes for you from Birmingham City FC's official chat room deadlyellis Posted: Dec 20 2006, 08:26 PM

Damien Johnson

Group: Members Member No.: 5,391 Joined: 26-July 06

I'm sure pictures very similar to that did the rounds at the time of dugarry's playing career at Blues and he certainly had the nickname le god

friendly76 Posted: Dec 21 2006, 09:27 AM

Peter Enckelman

Group: Members Member No.: 1,067 Joined: 12-June 05

To Me he was 'LE GOD' What a player even if it was only for six months, sublime skill, touch and knew exactly where the goal was.

Those six months i must admit were probably the most enjoyable six months watchin the blues for the past ten years easily.

How many time have we in the past gone behind but actually come back playing FOOTBALL and not just lump it forward and hope.

Thanks for the six months and raising the clubs profile LE GOD.

KRO

Rupert Johnson 10:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A link to my website with the published picture http://rupertjohnson.bravehost.com/blues_poster.html Rupert Johnson 10:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From ForsyteSaga[edit]

ony could you help my articles? --ForsyteSaga 15:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia color articles[edit]

I was wondering--Wikipedia is based on open software, isn't it? Remember when we both wrote the article on the color Old Lace? I also told you that I had written a number of other color articles for Wikipedia. What is the name of the software that Wikipedia uses to make the color box formula on the editing page display as a color box in the article? Is there a place on Wikipedia where I can download this software onto my own computer? Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you. Best wishes, Keraunos 23:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tag[edit]

Thank your for removing the tag and thank you for referring to my wordy, hyper-detailed and unnecessarily Cicero-esque defense in such positive terms. Blessed solstice.

◄HouseOfScandal ►12:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I Saw Chili's had a page, I thought Leatherby's should get one too[edit]

I thought if Chili's deserved a page, so did Leatherby's. I would love to say how great the place is more explicitly but didn't think that would be neutral. I will go looking back at why Chili's get a page and not Leatherby's, the #1 rule is BE BOLD so I will go see which lesser rule I have violated.

Thanks,

  Jim jim@utahnevada.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trackandtrain (talk • contribs)

Vandalism policy[edit]

Hello Tonywalton, thx for the info, I will act as you say. --Erkan Yilmaz 13:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD help[edit]

Thanks, I was having trouble with the editing, as you could tell. --DurinsBane87 16:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the last guy was telling me to. sorry, loose ends drive me nuts, but I'll be more patient in the future.--DurinsBane87 18:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From User:Markmayhew[edit]

Cut/pasted from my userpage How is it you get a page, and I don't? You are an editor, is that what makes you "notable"?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmayhew (talk • contribs)

Merry Winterval(s)!!!! (12-22-06)[edit]

Dear Tonywalton/Dec-2006,

I wish you a very, very merry Winterval!

And since I don't know which you celebrate, I hope you have/had/will have a very happy Holiday!. Hope you and your family have a magnificent day, or series of days! You might wanna install the "SaucyMillionaire" font to see this correctly. Cheers, mate!:) —Rand fan !!

God (or your deity/deities) bless you and your family! —¡Rand fan !^{Sign here?} 02:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-I was planning to hand these out on the 22nd of Dec. but things got in the way.... Happy holidays! —¡Rand fan !^{Sign here?} 20:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

help with my article is needed, I don't want it to be deleted! tips/suggestions please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie bartels (talk • contribs)

Speedy tags[edit]

Hi Tony - thanks for your comments, I think another re-read of the deletion criteria on my part is in order... still getting the hang of this :) Happy Christmas. MikeMorley 13:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From User:Markmayhew[edit]

Thanks for clearing up, wikipedia might want to figure out a way to provide for a warmer welcome to newbies though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmayhew (talk • contribs)

Re: User:Technajunky block[edit]

Ah, heh. ;) I usually leave protection, for a bit, just in case they calm down and get more rational about it. But if you think it'll help, no objection from me. Luna Santin 10:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, even better, then. And you do the same, cheers! :) Luna Santin 10:24, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Permanently blocked User:Technajunky Jayjg ^(talk) 19:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Complex numbers exponential[edit]

Yes, that was exactly the tag I was looking for. I didn't find it on WP:TD, which is where I usually go for "article has issues" tags, so I went with the best thing I could find there. Sometimes it's really a challenge with those templates to find what one I'm looking for, though I don't have a better idea on how to arrange them off the top of my head. —C.Fred (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about AfD[edit]

I'm new here, so I just wanted your opinion on something. Cars included in Gran Turismo 4 I really think is a pointless waste of space, and i was gonna give the guys a week to possibly make it acceptable, but they don't seem to be and I really think I should put it nominate it for AfD. Could you do me a huge favor and just look at it and give me your opinion, I don't want to overstep my bounds. Thanks --DurinsBane87 10:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Zeiton[edit]

MMM, i don't think that the article have to be deleted because the actual source is from the Coptic Synexarium book. I hope u return the page soon. thnx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athanasius 77 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

You're an Administrator?![edit]

Please tell me that you, an administator, don't use Alexa as a traffic guide! I'm optimistic that you realize Alexa only ranks sites by users using the Alexa toolbar. It's also called demographics... gamers do not use the Alexa toolbar not to mention that using Alexa to gauge traffic, though a good idea, went the way of the do-do a couple of years ago! And anyone who deletes an article literally while it is being created will get a nice Get a Life message from me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jasons4me (talk • contribs).

Morgan Chan deletion[edit]

We can't make biographies of other people? That's what I was trying to make.Usertalk: maxpayne4664

weathermen "fake" rap group[edit]

While this page has been deleted before, it is NOT a hoax. This is a comedy trio from Chicago's Second City. The page in question is the back story of the characters created by the three. There is verifiable proof/evidence the group exists toward the bottom labeled "The Weathermen Tapes". It is a direct link to a few of the groups comedy clips. They also have a Myspace account at www.myspace.com/the_weathermen

I assure you it is not a hoax and it is not fake. I hope this straightens things out. Having to repost is a bitch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1000zorses (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I'm supercool with it[edit]

Everything in there is someplace else, pretty much. If not, the stuff's in my hot little head:). I'm archiving my talk page and saving for historical purposes only. Thanks for your concern!Nina Odell 17:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got it right. I would also like my user page deleted as well. I've got all the stuff I need:).Nina Odell 18:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need. I'm a hothead for sure sometimes. I'm trying to tone it down, but it flairs up about a once a month. That wasn't why I was trying to delete the page, but I found the retirement template and that's enough for me. Thanks - NinaNina Odell 00:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack[edit]

How is it a personal attack? It was a page I created from my friends account for mine. It is not intended as an attack whatsoever, but merely a well-known inside joke between friends. I find it significant enough about myself to put on my user page. --User:Relox 19:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sr13 (T|C)[edit]

Yes, I know...it's deleted by now. II didn't know it was a copyvio because it was a copy and paste. I plan to post the article up again after refurmishing. Sr13 (T|C) 19:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hothead redux[edit]

Please click on useless image. Happy New Year from a complete maniac. Nina Odell 19:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Gamaliel would get pissed? Do you know him? Thanks in advance.Nina Odell 19:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NUFC[edit]

Not entirely sure if I am doing this right, but I am extremely pissed off at some idiots contributions to the Newcastle United FC page which I was idly looking at. Ridiculous abuse is not what i look for on wikipedia which generally I respect greatly. I saw that you updated league positions on the site at some point so thought you might be able to sort this out as apparently I can't. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.81.183 (talk • contribs)

Reply: Report of Vandalism[edit]

Ok, ill remember that. Thanks :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 13:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josemanuel martinez at WP:PNT[edit]

Not a prob. Google gave 96 hits and I even lived in the area that he's from during the period he was supposedly a hit. Never heard of him! Most of the article was the typical vanity stuff. -Yupik 20:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]