User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured article help[edit]

Hey, well the main problem I see with the articles is that are very short, that's probably due to the lack of sources, but I would try and expand the articles anyway you can. I would suggest taking one of them to peer review, that way you will get the views of a few reviewers (hopefully) and they can tell you what areas need to be improved. At the moment I think the articles would struggle to get to FA, but if you try and model the article on a current FA Germany women's national football team, then I think you've got a chance. The only problem is that the teams don't seem to have much playing history which would make it hard to extend the article, I would definitely put one at Pr, though to get some feedback. Let me know when you I'd be happy to lend a few comments. Also it might be worth asking for a few more opinions at WP:FOOTY, as there a lot of users there with experience of getting articles through the featured process. NapHit (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interview Wiki news[edit]

I'll have the interview done for by tomorrow. The first time I took my 30 minutes to fill it in and then went to copy paste and everything was suddenly gone so i wasn't really in the mood to write all over again but I'll re-write it again and have it for you by tomorrow. Or is it to late AdabowtheSecond (talk) 01:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Thanks. --LauraHale (talk) 02:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


See[edit]

St. Gregory Luxury Hotels & Suites. Thanks! ⇒TAP 13:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Go Green Racing.
Message added 23:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Bushranger One ping only 23:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Question[edit]

Was your removal of content on The Churchill Hotel because of a Wikipedia policy, or as a personal preference-like thing? (Link is incorrect). ⇒TAP 07:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


WP:0RR at Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki[edit]

As you were a recent participant in an edit war at the above-named article I am taking the opportunity to warn you formally that the article is now under a no-reverts rule. This means that from now on anyone making a revert will be blocked instantly without further warning, except in cases of really obvious vandalism. Instead of reverting, you should consider trying for compromise either by drafting a good-faith compromise in the article, or discussing towards one in talk. Edit-warring deters other editors and poisons the atmosphere that we need to edit constructively. Please do not do it. --John (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I am really sorry[edit]

To see people shitting on your work. People need to stop with the WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Statυs (talk) 03:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Canvasing[edit]

Hi Laura. I'm sorry to have to raise this at all, but your recent messages to various editors in regard to the Justin Bieber on Twitter AfD seem to run afoul WP:CANVAS. I'm sure that wasn't your intention, but while there is room for notifying interested parties, it probably wasn't the best choice to focus mostly on one side of the debate. I'm not sure if anything can be done to balance things out a bit, but it might be worth being a tad more careful with notifications to avoid any mistaken perception of bias. - Bilby (talk) 05:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it was one sided. I attempted to comment on everyone's talk page who participated in the merge conversation, with the exception of Lady Shallot and drmies. I can comment on theirs if required but my understanding was they were already aware of this. Beyond those two, I think everyone else was alerted no matter how they voted. --LauraHale (talk) 06:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. You did alert everyone who voted against merging, but you missed most of the people who voted for. Presumably drmies and Lady Shallot are aware of the afd, but there are others, such as Istara and Til I Go Home who weren't. I figure it was just an oversight, or you assumed that they would already know - my concern is only over a perception, rather than necessarily anything more, and so I figured it was worth raising briefly. - Bilby (talk) 06:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Both you mentioned were already participating in the deletion debate. I was not aware I had to inform users who had already voted about the existence of the conversation? And some of the people I have notified who supported a merge came in and voted delete very soon after having been informed by me. Have you also messaged the nominator about how they failed to inform myself, Hawkeye7 and drmies about the deletion notice and others who participated in the merge conversation? --LauraHale (talk) 06:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Did they? Perhaps I missed them - that would explain things - but I couldn't see their votes. At any rate, I thought Hawkeye7 made a pretty good point about how LuciferWildCat stuffed up there, and I agree that it was pretty bad form. The article creator should always be contacted when something the wrote goes to AfD. - Bilby (talk) 06:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I might have made a good faith miss on Till I Go Home because they have been active in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton Kutcher on Twitter‎ that conversation. In any case, I can/will go ahead and notify them.--LauraHale (talk) 06:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I thought must have happened - just an oversight. I wasn't aware of the other AfD, so that makes a lot of sense. All's good then. :) - Bilby (talk) 06:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fan of the Kutcher article. I think the article is notable but just annoyed with it. The screencaps on Kutcher need to go. I'd actually be inclined to support an AfD/Merge for Barack Obama on Twitter. I've spent more time than I care to admit trying to make sure Justin Bieber on Twitter stands as independently notable and Obama isn't anywhere near that, with like zero mentions in most of the sources I'm looking at. His coverage is NOT independent of other coverage, whereas Bieber and Gaga coverage is often mentioned independent of other topics or where people talk about how batshit insane Bieber's Twitter followers are. It should be merged into Use of Twitter by celebrities and politicians but I'm not going to actually do that. Anyway, tl;dr oversights were accidental. --LauraHale (talk) 06:50, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've been generally aware of them, but haven't been following the AfDs much - too much marking to do at this time of year, and what time I'm not spending marking seems to be taken up on data collection. :) Anyway, I'm glad I raised things with you - it was an easy fix, and didn't warrant mentioning anywhere else. Good luck with the AfD. - Bilby (talk) 07:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I submit my thesis tomorrow. AfD is a question of what is notable and encyclopediaic. There are over 150 sources in the article. I could probably add another 3,000 if necessary but I've been focusing more on academic sources today to help build a better argument against fancruft. --LauraHale (talk) 07:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, extra good luck with the thesis. I hope it get's accepted outright without changes. :) - Bilby (talk) 07:16, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Won't happen but nice to be optimistic. :) Twitter is a major part of my thesis. Hence my interest in these articles. --LauraHale (talk) 07:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's a much cooler topic than my work. :) I'm stuck with much more boring epistemology research. I should have done twitter. - Bilby (talk) 07:34, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Plenty of room for Twitter research in other fields. ;) My stuff is basically methodology. --LauraHale (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Did you know nominations/Twine (band)[edit]

Laura, you had requested that additional sources be added to this DYK-nominated article, and the creator has responded that this has been done. Please take a look and see if this satisfies your concerns. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Justin Bieber again[edit]

I think the Justin Bieber on Twitter article could stand some expansion to incorporate the new material you have unearthed. If it's okay with you, I would like to ask the delegate to withdraw the FAC nomination at this time. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Please feel free. Article has stability problems at the moment so probably not the best time. --LauraHale (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Sports[edit]

Not necessarily criticising your delisting of said article as in its current state it is a bit lacking on sourcing, but your failure to transclude your GAR to the talk page or to leave a courtesy note on WT:OLY might be the reasons no-one showed up to try and fix things. I've now done both on your behalf - Basement12 (T.C) 16:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no obligation to transclude the GA reassessment, so that is not a failure on Lauras part. The olympic wikiproject should have been notified though, which is partly my fault as I was asked to help with notifying[1] but never got around to it. AIRcorn (talk) 22:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Women's teams[edit]

Hey - FYI Togo and Gambia are still open. Togo's really close -- just one thing with sourcing outstanding. They're listed on the Good article nominations page...--Batard0 (talk) 06:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'm sure we can get these done fairly quickly.--Batard0 (talk) 06:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Justin Bieber on Twitter/1[edit]

This article is listed for reassessment. However, voting is not allowed there, but you are welcome to voice your opinions. --George Ho (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Côte d'Ivoire women's national football team[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seen Lee[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ashleigh Brennan[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Larrissa Miller[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emily Little[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Joshua Jefferis[edit]

Thanks from the DYK team. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Oman women's national football team[edit]

Thanks from the DYK team. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amy Cure[edit]

Thank-you from the DYK helpers and Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jade Close[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Cambodia women's national football team[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sioma[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kenya women's national football team[edit]

Thank you from the DYK team at English Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emily Smith (field hockey)[edit]

Thank you from the DYK team. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The Signpost: 02 July 2012[edit]

Wiki News[edit]

Hello, so i finished the interview you sent me. What now? AdabowtheSecond (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


WP:articles for deletion/Ashton Kutcher on Twitter[edit]

Now the article is deleted. If possible, you can request a userfication in WP:REFUND or WP:DRV. --George Ho (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mentor, I have a question[edit]

Hello, remember me? You volunteered to mentor me about the GA process. Well, I recently did alot of work on article, and would like not only a quick little scan/review, but possibly something else. You said you would be willing to nominate an article for GA, and that I could make all the changes the reviewer requests, just not sign my changes on the review page. Well, I would appreciate it if you would do that for this article. Thanks, Oakley77 (talk) 16:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've pretty much spelled out the conditions of mentorship and offered a few articles with rather clear directions on how to fix them. You did one or two small things on one of them, but not to the extent where it is ready for nomination. If you're serious about wanting to learn about GAN and wanting me to mentor you, I'd like to see work on these with the mini-peer reviews done for you explaining what needs to be done for the articles. Doing this would indicate to me a committment to and willingness to do work required for GANs more in your interest area. Beyond that, the things I've spelled out generally specifically speak to GAN criteria. (In this case things like WP:SUMMARY for the lead, broad in coverage, etc.) Sticking non-club information into a section on club play made me scratch my head as it didn't make sense why that was there, especially when one look at the sources said she played club water polo. --LauraHale (talk) 21:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Chongqing is not ready for a GAN nomination. The article has many unsourced statements. There are a lot of short, choppy paragraphs. The citations are not consistently formatted. There are images and quotes and text boxes that appear random, with no context or real explanation as to why they are in the article other than "PRETTY!" There are a few statements like "The politics of Chongqing is structured in a dual party-government system like all other governing institutions in the People's Republic of China." which need elaboration, either through judicious use of interwiki linking or expansion of the text. (Because the statement itself indicates that information is out there which can tell me that. It isn't a case of the media doesn't report on it so no sources are available.) There may need to be better list incorporation. The amount of work required to bring this to GAN would probably be at least 5 to 10 hours in terms of completely sourcing it, fixing the short, choppy sentences and dealing with the image/table/list/quotation box problem. --LauraHale (talk) 21:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I really wanted to work on a city article specifically in China, but anywhere is fine. it is something that greatly interests me. I would appreceate if you would help me get a city article to GAN status, then our review system would kick into gear. Oakley77 (talk) 02:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to find a Chinese city to take to good status, look at the following examples: Chadderton, Altrincham, Ashton-under-Lyne, Birchington-on-Sea, Canberra. What do these four articles have in common that make them amongst the best content on Wikipedia? If you really want to take a Chinese city to GAN and you want my assistance, explain to me the GAN criteria and how those five articles meet them GAN criteria or do not meet the GAN criteria. We can't move forward and towards you becoming involved with GAN unless you can do that. As a general hint, the reason the football articles for men's national teams were dinged down from Bs to Cs based almost exclusively on one of those GAN criteria. Can you explain what criteria that was? --LauraHale (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1. All three of these articles are astoundingly flowing and clear to read, as well as being grammatically sound.
  • 2. All copyright laws seem to be respected.
  • 3. The MoS is followed virtually impeccably.
  • 4. All the articles have more than enough references relating to their size and importance.
  • 5. Inline citations are everywhere there is a statement made needing a source or fact-check. (Although more citations doesn't necessarily hurt!)
  • 6. None of the research is original, bar commonplace stuff like Canberra is the capital of Australia, Altrincham is in the UK, etc.
  • 7. All main topics are addressed, and the articles really don't stray to far off the path, so to speak.
  • 8. No bias is hinted towards in the articles.
  • 9. No edit wars or disputes appear in the histories, there were some undoings of edits, but no true disputes.
  • 10. Although I couldn't check all the images, I selected a random bunch and they all were free-use images or had fair-use statements. I do understand that in the GA process however, all images will be checked.
  • 11. Images are all relevant to the topic, and have explanatory captions.
  • This is all the criteria I know of needed for a GA article, and something all the shown articles exemplify. Oakley77 (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Wikinews[edit]

Since we're chatting so much, maybe I can do interview with you to try to get published on Wikinews about maintaining the One Direction article. If you are interested, below are a few questions:

  1. Are you a One Direction fan? If yes, how did you become a fan of the group? Have you seen them live and do you participate in online fandom?

Yes I'm a One Direction fan, well it all started in October 2011 when i stumbled on an article on Billboard.com which featured One Direction which i obviously then never heard of I looked a the picture of them and "the asian" of the group (Zayn Malik) amazing skin and impeccable bone structure instantly had me a standstill, so next thing i did was listen to just then UK released single "What Makes You Beautiful" i became utterly obessed with it played for two days straight before my siblings eventually started objecting, the following thing i did was visit their wikipedia page to get me so more info on this "One Direction" which I was progressively started to like, as I continued to watch their X Factor performances and interviews i fell in love with all of them, their personalities were amazing, funny, just themselves, and as i watched their live videos and acoustic, acapella performances (on Youtube) i realized they can all sing i had previously only taught Liam Payne and Harry Styles could sing. Love rant over.....

  1. Why do you maintain the One Direction page on Wikipedia?

About Wikipedia, it officially started in November 2011 as i was trolling 1D's sub articles - i was distinctly on their One Direction discography page at it frustrated me that a certain chart wasn't added so pressed the edit button for the first time and the rest is history. I eventually made an account because i wanted to be able to edit 1D's main article and trace my edits, and have never looked back :D. I love editing wikipedia. You will find 90% of edits on One Direction related articles. I maintain the article because they make me really happy and I felt that the page needed to be improved. The page in November 2011, when i first visited it as you can see it has drastically improved with my edits over 800 to date.

  1. Have you been blocked for editing the article? Or been involved in any major editing disputes on the article?

Never with their articles just only with the AFD's surrounding the members individual pages - the second time I launched the members individual pages, I got blocked because during the AFD dicussion i used 3 different accounts in one discussion so i would have more votes. I was blocked for two days.

  1. What are the challenges in maintaining the page?

I guess finding the time to, as I am a teenager and attend the second highest level of academic system in my country, I have regular tests and projects, so finding the time and not let it affect my academic performance. Another challenge is probably that I'm the only regular editor of their page. Wikipedia editors are not so active on boy band articles; take a look at the main article of The Wanted, JLS, Big Time Rush (band), Hot Chelle Rae, their all hideous; no images, bad coverage, various typos and their sub articles are all stubs if it wasn't for me One Direction related articles would be the same.

  1. Were do you go to look for sources to use in the article? Are there any sources you know that are unreliable that you avoid or remove when others add them?

I'm open to all sources except the you tube, Facebook,twitter, fan websites, tumbler.

  1. Has anyone tried to nominate the article for deletion? How do you handle that?

Never a One Direction article, with the individual pages for the Members (which have been deleted twice), You try to argument the best you can and hope that it stays, which isn't quite easy ass editors are not so fond of the band. Once i cited an example (to a administrator) that the Coldplay members (except for Chris Martin) have not done anything outside the band and they have individual articles since 2007 and he/she didn't do anything about it while deleting a 1D member individual article, i think because Coldplay are more respected in editors eyes and they grant it them despite it violating the guidelines.

  1. Do you get crap on Wikipedia because of the article you maintain? Do you feel respected as an editor for maintaining an article about a "boy band"? Do people comment on your taste in music?

Editors have never comment on my taste of music to date. I have taken quite some crap from editors specifically in AFD discussions attacking me personally, I don't want to elaborate further. With the hole boy band thing, I don't care if editors don't respect me if i'm prominent editor of 1D articles, why should I like them, they make me happy, I now I'm never going to meet them or have a relationship with one of them, I just appreciate them.

  1. How involved were you in the Good Article preparation? What were specific challenges getting the article ready to nominate?

With the GA; ever since someone told me that I could bring the article to Featured Article status, I deepened myself into the hole process, of bringing the article to higher status. So after of improving based on GA criteria, I felt the article was ready.

  1. Do you think articles like One Direction and Justin Bieber are good types of articles to get more female involvement on Wikipedia? Do you think women should be encouraged to edit articles about popular culture topics because the topic is more likely to interest them?

Sure, you can really see the majority of Wikipedia is run by men, as articles about male recording artist/ current boy bands/ Female TV shows are often neglected.

  1. What do people in your off Wikipedia life think of your Wikipedia work?

My family thinks are fine with it although they discourage me to not spend so much time on it. My friends think it weird, so i never talk about with them.

  1. Have you been to any Wikipedia meetups and conferences? If yes, did you enjoy them? If not, why not?

Never, due to my location.

  1. Any other background information you want to provide on your editing or life?

I'm a teenager currently on vacation after a hard year of learning :). In the summer of 2013 I will move abroad to study at the University. English is my third language so excuse if I made so spelling or grammar mistakes.

DYK nomination of Olympic Dam Airport[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Olympic Dam Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mgrē@sŏn 18:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Mgrē@sŏn 18:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, I'll accept that and continue with the review. Mgrē@sŏn 02:45, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks...[edit]

...for the kitten it is much appreciated. I have a favour to ask, can you try this, http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/publications/reports-and-statistics/movements-at-australian-airports/ and see if it works for you. It did for me about 14 hours ago but now I get nothing and I'm trying to update Avalon Airport. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 11:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yep it was supposed to be a set of links to PDF files. It must not like foreigners today, or just my IP address. I'll try later when I go home. In truth I don't know much about Australian airports. I basically update the infobox and any statistics I see along with fixing disambiguation links. Olympic Dam does have scheduled flights. Thanks again. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 11:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GAN Criteria Question[edit]

You asked me this question:

If you want to find a Chinese city to take to good status, look at the following examples: Chadderton, Altrincham, Ashton-under-Lyne, Birchington-on-Sea, Canberra. What do these four articles have in common that make them amongst the best content on Wikipedia? If you really want to take a Chinese city to GAN and you want my assistance, explain to me the GAN criteria and how those five articles meet them GAN criteria or do not meet the GAN criteria. We can't move forward and towards you becoming involved with GAN unless you can do that. As a general hint, the reason the football articles for men's national teams were dinged down from Bs to Cs based almost exclusively on one of those GAN criteria. Can you explain what criteria that was? --LauraHale (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And so I answered it:

  • 1. All three of these articles are astoundingly flowing and clear to read, as well as being grammatically sound.
  • 2. All copyright laws seem to be respected.
  • 3. The MoS is followed virtually impeccably.
  • 4. All the articles have more than enough references relating to their size and importance.
  • 5. Inline citations are everywhere there is a statement made needing a source or fact-check. (Although more citations doesn't necessarily hurt!)
  • 6. None of the research is original, bar commonplace stuff like Canberra is the capital of Australia, Altrincham is in the UK, etc.
  • 7. All main topics are addressed, and the articles really don't stray to far off the path, so to speak.
  • 8. No bias is hinted towards in the articles.
  • 9. No edit wars or disputes appear in the histories, there were some undoings of edits, but no true disputes.
  • 10. Although I couldn't check all the images, I selected a random bunch and they all were free-use images or had fair-use statements. I do understand that in the GA process however, all images will be checked.
  • 11. Images are all relevant to the topic, and have explanatory captions.
  • This is all the criteria I know of needed for a GA article, and something all the shown articles exemplify. Oakley77 (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside DYK[edit]

I added cites for those two. Daniel Case (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Edit warring notice[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:Hawkeye7. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Re[edit]

I have seen you have archived the interview, are you going to use it or not. Please respond AdabowtheSecond (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Jaele Patrick[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Janine Murray[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sierra Leone women's national football team[edit]

The article Sierra Leone women's national football team you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Sierra Leone women's national football team for things which need to be addressed. Tea with toast (話) 23:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --LauraHale (talk) 12:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1D GA[edit]

The One Direction article can officially be assessed as one of the second highest rated pages in Wikipedia, it passed GA AdabowtheSecond (talk) 17:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The GAN Process[edit]

Recently, you asked me to define my views on the GAN process. I did, and posted them on your talk page. You didn't respond, and the thread was placed in the archive. So I placed on your page again. Still, no response. Please, take a look. It is in Archive 10, and it will help our mentor-pupil relationship. Oakley77 (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Kaila McKnight[edit]

Hi Laura, just a quick question at the nom page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Genevieve LaCaze[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Genevieve LaCaze at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AusTerrapin (talk) 07:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I responded to Template:Did you know nominations/Genevieve LaCaze. Can you come back and finish the review? :) --LauraHale (talk) 05:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. AusTerrapin (talk) 13:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Sangeet Sharada[edit]

Hey. I would appreciate if you can take a look at the DYK nomination here. - VivvtTalk 11:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've rectified the article per suggestion. Please verify. - VivvtTalk 14:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Tea with toast's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Hospital DYK[edit]

Replied to your question. PumpkinSky talk 00:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded.PumpkinSky talk 01:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Dance Again... the Hits[edit]

I don't know if you're allowed to ask users to review DYKs or not, so I'm not going to. I'm just posting a random link above, that has been pending for quite a bit. That is all, nothing more. Statυs (talk) 11:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: June 2012[edit]



Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 12:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Allan Graf[edit]

Thanks for reviewing my nomination for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Allan Graf. I've removed all references to IMDB and eliminated any facts which I learned by reading the linked pages. In my view, the page and hook stand solidly on the references currently applied. The hook itself draws from just two citations, one covering the sports history and one covering the movie career. I'd appreciate your giving my comments and the page a second look at your convenience. Because American football season is two months away, I see no reason why there's a rush in DYK placement; IMHO this hook might better serve the pedia in August after the Olympics, with NCAA football season approaching. Just my suggestion. Thanks again for helping. BusterD (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your reviewing and protecting the pedia, especially in a BLP situation. If I could only get some free use images of this fellow... Thanks again! BusterD (talk) 03:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for your DYK review of Wye Bridge Ward, Monmouth. Anne (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nominations Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reviews/comments on the DYK nominations for Wilburn Hill King and Levin Major Lewis. By the way, your voluminous contributions to Wikipedia are quite impressive and you deserve considerable credit and praise for them. Donner60 (talk) 21:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Andrews[edit]

Hi, I've responded to your review at Template:Did you know nominations/John Andrews (footballer born 1978). Don't know what had gone wrong in the last 12 hours but it should be sorted now. Just let me know if there's any more issues. Cheers, BigDom 11:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Rcsprinter (warn) @ 15:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at WP:AFC.
Message added 00:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hannah Davis (kayaker)[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 08:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Veton Berisha[edit]

I've finished the two other articles, and it should be just about good enough (maybe except my grammar). There are a couple of things I want to explain to you: Ref #2 in Egil Fjetland, and Ref #3 in Jan Fjetland (same ref), doesn't really mention any of them but I wanted to source that Vidar have never been as good as between 1983 and 1987, the time both were playing there. Additionally Ref #6 in Jan Fjetland was a dead link, and I couldn't find a proper archived version, but I found a readable version through google so that the info is verifiable, but it looks like a mess. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ballarat Miners[edit]

Thanks for your message - it's almost up to 1500 but I can't really think of an interesting hook. Any ideas? Hack (talk) 15:32, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kristy and Lyndal Oatley[edit]

I've reviewed your DYK nominations for both Lyndal and Kristy Oatley and while both are fine as they are I've suggested combining them into one hook. It's very much up to you however and if you prefer I can pass them as they are - Basement12 (T.C) 16:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thought about that. At the time I nominated the first one, I was having database errors that prevented the one article from viewing. Can do that. --LauraHale (talk)
I've given then all clear to the new double hook - Basement12 (T.C) 23:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome and thanks for the review. :) --LauraHale (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Where do you want your Olympian DYKs?[edit]

Laura, I was preparing to move recently passed DYKs on Olympic topics to the special holding area, but I realized as I found them that yours don't say whether you want them to be moved there so they run during the games, or if you want them to run normally. Do you have a preference?

Miyagawa has been specifying which ones should be moved; there are two I've just moved. Basement12, on the other hand, says "Can be used", so I'm not sure whether to move the three of them; if I don't, they're likely to get snapped up by the end of the week. Thoughts as to whether we'll need them for the Olympics? As of a few minutes ago, you had eight that have been approved, five of which are from June 9 and two from June 5. If they should be moved, I can move them, or you can do it yourself if you'd rather. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/List of number-one dance singles of 2010 (U.S.).
Message added 11:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron • You Da One 11:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Amy Clay DYK[edit]

I've reviewed the Amy Clay nom, everything fine with the article but I thought the hook was a bit dull. I've suggested an alternative, see what think of it - Basement12 (T.C) 15:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've made further comments at the DYK page - Basement12 (T.C) 00:25, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to do this, I know your dealing with lots of these, but there is still an issue around Clay's birthplace. I'll take a look at some of your multi-article hooks later today - Basement12 (T.C) 02:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Did you know nominations/Krystal Weir[edit]

Ping. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another DYK review[edit]

Hi Laura, I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Hayley Chapman (sport shooter) and left a comment re: tense used in the article - I'm not sure the article is wrong though so feel free to tell me to stop being so pedantic! Cheers, Nikthestoned 14:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed Frankie Owen. Nice work. Someone should be by to promote it soon. Care to do a review of 1906 (novel)? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --LauraHale (talk) 03:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Handled. Care to revisit? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You've got mail![edit]

^. ⇒TAP 21:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/I Will Be.
Message added 22:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron • You Da One 22:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Magic 2013 DYK[edit]

Hi, I've responded at Magic 2013 DYK and believe I've resolved the sourcing issues mentioned, let me know if not! Cheers, Nikthestoned 23:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ?[edit]

Hi Laura: It's been a very long time indeed since I contributed an article to DYK, and many things have changed since then. I see my current article (Vegetarian Finch) has been accepted, except that a QPQ needs to be done. Is that something I do, or something someone else does? Any advice you can provide would be most appreciated! Thanks! MeegsC | Talk 23:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! I just found out when I went to edit the article's entry in the queue. Will do a review as soon as I can get my own computer connected to the internet. In a cafe at the moment, and have to get back on the boat soon... MeegsC | Talk 23:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Green Winslow[edit]

Hi! It took me a little while, but I think I have the article on Anna Green Winslow up to snuff for you. I know you thought the article might be on the diary, but isn't she kind of like Samuel Pepys in that he's really only known for his diary? (Yes, I know Pepys was an M.P., but it's the diary that comes to mind.)

Please let me know if you need me to recast it as an article on the diary. I'll need a bit of assistance, too, as I don't really know how to create a redirect page.

Lastly, I used the Project Gutenberg version, which contains page numbers from the 1894 publication, for the Winslow citations. Any suggestions on how I should clarify that further if that is still troublesome?

Thanks for your help! Miss Ivonne (talk) 23:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Idaho State Highway 50.
Message added 00:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rschen7754 00:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alimuddin (cricketer)[edit]

I'm going to make some change, but some the cann't be modified i.e brothers azimuddin and salimuddin, pakistan international airlines, national stadium karachi etc. ZiaKhan 05:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. So long as everything is addressed. (There are some sport things which cannot be easily reworded. That's sports.) I will seek a second opinion regarding things being fixed before it eventually gets the tick because copyvios are always a big concern. --LauraHale (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback at Template:Did you know nominations/2000 Tenneco Automotive Grand Prix of Detroit[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/2000 Tenneco Automotive Grand Prix of Detroit.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Harrias talk 09:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: DYK nomination for Battle of Barranca Seca[edit]

I tried to fix the problems you ponited out. Please take some time to re-review it. Thanks. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 10:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Drang-drung Glacier.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 MehrajMir ' (Talk) 12:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dock Ellis[edit]

I responded at Template:Did you know nominations/Dock Ellis. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Maternal sensitivity Review[edit]

Hello and thank you for reviewing my nomination for Maternal sensitivity. I made changes as per your request and also commented on the nomination. Please check. Thank you very much. Carina1205 (talk) 17:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 19:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Regards, ⇒TAP 19:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Miguel Ángel Mancera[edit]

I answered your remarks. The article is fully sourced and I suggested four alternatives. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:32, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Arabian protests[edit]

G'day Laura. i've cleaned up the bare url's in the Saudi Arabian protest DYK article - thanks for starting the review. Here's a link so that you can get back there quickly: Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of the 2011–2012 Saudi Arabian protests (from July 2012). Boud (talk) 21:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hyon Song-wol[edit]

I've addressed the issue you raised with my DYK nomination of Hyon Song-wol - see Template:Did you know nominations/Hyon Song-wol. Prioryman (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

Sorry to hear of the fate of the Bieber on Twitter article, which I know you put a lot of work into. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wish Laura you'd just let this pass. People have wasted enough time on the Bieber on Twitter issue as it is. No it isn't nice to have an article you've put time into deleted but its pointless chasing something which is unlikely to be restored.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond filing the one thing, I haven't done much... Is it going to be restored? No. WP:IDONTLIKEIT will be enshrined as policy going forward, but outside of the filing, I haven't done much. I don't care about the article. That isn't my priority. What have I spent more time on recently? Responding to the closure thing, or writing articles about Olympians and Paralympians? Where do you think my editing priorities actually are based on my actions? The accusations of non-good faith are not much appreciated. --LauraHale (talk) 19:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Reminders and pings[edit]

Laura, I see three reviews that you will want to get back to:

  • June 18: Werner E. Ablaß
  • July 5: Gibraltar Museum
  • July 7: Aureole (horse)

You also told me to ping you if there were any leftover old hooks that needed reviewing or re-reviewing, and there's one, though it's a bit of a doozy:

Thanks! —BlueMoonset (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to the first and second one this afternoon. I'm not touching the horse won and did not count it as a QPQ. We had a problem with that nominating duo before, where PHLai was nominating a lot of his, and he was then taking credit for them at Wikicup. When asked to do QPQs for her many nominations, she said a while back that she doesn't have the time to do them because it would take away from other valuable Wikipedia work. (I really think there should be some rule modification that says any DYK that counts towards Wikicup requires 2 QPQs.) In any case, going to get one article to DYK before lunch, then lunch, home and will tackle the three others if I can (re: Last one). --LauraHale (talk) 02:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the horse one can sit. I can understand your disinclination to touch it under the circumstances; it's especially brazen given the nomination immediately above it. However, I have a surprise for you...:

Yes, Muboshgu expanded it enough to make 5x. (Don't know why DYKcheck doesn't quite agree, but after I said 9305, and it's now at 9450(!), as far as I'm concerned it's 5x.) BlueMoonset (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded two what I think needs responding. :( I'm not sure I want to wade into the morass that is that one article about Pakistan. --LauraHale (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Both Gilbraltars on July 5 are ready for a revisit. I've also done something to Barbeque Nation on that same date which needs a look as well. I can understand why you wouldn't want to hit the Pakistan one, but it does need attention and at this point I'm no longer a disinterested party. If you definitely don't want to wade, maybe I should ping Orlady, since I did promise an independent/unaffiliated review in short order. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Will try to get to the Gilbraltars later today. (I have a meeting in 90 minutes and I want to get two more DYKs done.) I've requested second opinions on a few because the promotional aspects bothered me. Will look at Barbecue Nation but if it was the "have it at your plate thing" not going to get tick from me. If Orlay doesn't get it the Pakistan one later today, I'll try to get it done. My major fear is I'll do the review and then systematic problems will again be founded. --LauraHale (talk) 03:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Barbecue Nation was more about future plans, but I reverted to the "grill at each table" because it's their gimmick and it sounds really strange to me to go out to a restaurant only to have to cook the meal yourself. (I think you do a little grilling if you want, plus there's a buffet for the bulk of it, but I wasn't exactly clear on how it worked, and only interested in reading sources to the point where I understood enough to recast the hooks.) Mea culpa in that I didn't make a request on Orlady's page until several hours ago, so I don't know how soon she'll see it. I could always try Crisco next if she says no. I always dread that Nikkimaria's going to find a problem with one of my reviews or promotions. (It wasn't Nikkimaria today, but the photo of the phorminx in queue 4 is being challenged. Oh well.) Thanks for the amazing work you're doing on the articles and the reviews: it takes me way too long with both. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nation is not one I will ever be comfortable passing at this point I don't think. Ditto the wineries one. : / Completely understand your fear about passing/moving hooks that then turn out to have issues that I didn't pick up. Hence, I feel more likely to ping them for problems than I might otherwise. --LauraHale (talk) 08:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Someone else will have to do those two, then. I've given up on Mazatlan, myself: I don't know whether you want to give it another look. In the ping department, I think the two Gibraltars ought to be safe, though, when you're able to get back to them. I'm done for the night. Need sleep! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


A kitten for you![edit]

Your talk page needs more kittens.

Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meow I appreciate the recognition, very much, coming from as quality a contributor as yourself. Now on to a thousand ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

It certainly does, doesn't it, Hawkeye?

⇒TAP 21:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Large collection of wine for you![edit]

A large collection of wine for you!
I know you spent a while on the Justin Bieber article, which recently got deleted. ⇒TAP 19:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Another kitten for your collection[edit]

Just read the JB AfD, couldnt believe how it ended. I hope you don't get discouraged, you presented your case very well. In a venue where participants are half decent at perceiving the substantive balance of a discussion, you would have swayed things your way. I hope you find other places to publicise your good work; social media is a massively important topic for sociologists, political science, and even for corporate strategists.

FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, that's good to hear and I think its a wise approach. I also try to restrict myself to mostly working only on topics where my views match what the community seems to consider respectable and mainstream. Makes for a more peaceful editing experience. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
True. At least Fram has kindly restored the history to the redirect, so tech savvy academics and fans can view your original work. And in a few years, by which time elite editors will hopefully have caught up with the 21th century and be able to appreaciate social media topics, a non admin will be able to retore the article to its former glory :-). FeydHuxtable (talk) 13:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


A brownie for you![edit]

Major apologies - accidentally clicked on the wrong button on my watch list and rolled you back - really, really sorry! Fayedizard (talk) 21:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've complained[edit]

I'm a bit surprised that you passed Template:Did you know nominations/He Bowls To The Left. I think it's so inappropriate that I've AFD'd it. Not everything that The Daily Tele writes about is notable. The-Pope (talk) 16:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which criteria did it fail DYK rules under? The hook as a BLP violation is the best one I could possibly see. And if you AfDed it, that's fine. I've nominated stuff for AfD that I've seen at DYK myself where notability wasn't clear but didn't quite see it in this article as obvious problem when nominated given sources used. --LauraHale (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Talkback[edit]

Done QPQ - Template:Did you know nominations/All in the Family (Body of Proof). — M.Mario (T/C) 22:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Louise Bawden[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maternal Sensitivity for DYK nomination[edit]

Thank you for your recent review on Maternal sensitivity: Template:Did you know nominations/Maternal sensitivity. A comment has also been left on the DYK nomination page. Your concerns have been addressed and changes have been made. Please take a re-look at the article on Maternal sensitivity and re-consider the nomination. R-Bot6 (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you asked SG a question, I also noticed that she is on vacation. I'm happy that the Stadthaus article and DYK nom could be improved, thank you, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:R-Bot6#A kitten for you![edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at R-Bot6's talk page.
Message added 04:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/List of number-one R&B singles of 2011 (U.S.).
Message added 13:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron • You Da One 13:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is now 1689 of readable prose, above the 1500 requirement. Aaron • You Da One 19:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/I Will Be.
Message added 13:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You said I needed 8810 characters, the article is now 8834. The picture is also in the article. Aaron • You Da One 13:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/List of number-one R&B singles of 2011 (U.S.)[edit]

Passing Template:Did you know nominations/List of number-one R&B singles of 2011 (U.S.) back to you. I believe the editor now understands about acceptable readable prose and 5x expansions. They seem to have the length correct, and you started the review. So, here you go...Maile66 (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you go back to this nomination and the one for I Will Be please. Aaron • You Da One 10:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've done another hook. Aaron • You Da One 21:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Rzepecki[edit]

I've suggested an ALT hook at Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Rzepecki, see what you think. Cheers - Basement12 (T.C) 20:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Talk:Tyan Taylor/GA1.
Message added 20:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Statυs (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Talk:Meica Christensen/GA1.
Message added 20:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Statυs (talk) 20:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Talk:Michelle Rzepecki/GA1.
Message added 20:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Statυs (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Talk:Rachel Henderson/GA1.
Message added 20:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Statυs (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Talk:Jennifer Blow/GA1.
Message added 21:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Statυs (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Talk:Nicole Esdaile/GA1.
Message added 21:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Statυs (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Good articles/Sports and recreation[edit]

Not sure where to place the articles under. Statυs (talk) 21:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous sport is the best one. That is where another few Paralympic articles are. --LauraHale (talk) 21:32, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. It took a bit (LOL), but I've passed and listed them all! Great work! Statυs (talk) 21:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics one been missed[edit]

Template:Did you know nominations/Ortrun Enderlein is an Olympics one that is now in prep1. Can you fix it (I've not handled prep areas). Secretlondon (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no problem. Do you think that winter olympians needs to be saved (I'd say yes, why not - but others are saying no). Secretlondon (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Alimuddin (cricketer).
Message added ZiaKhan 06:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Olivia Price (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bowman and Skipper
Mary Hanna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Presbyterian Ladies College
Tamika Domrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mike Burgess

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Weekes[edit]

Template:Did you know nominations/Ben Weekes - you know the drill by now :) - Basement12 (T.C) 13:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK review[edit]

Hello. I have addressed your concerns at Template:Did you know nominations/Curtis Dvorak. -- Mgrē@sŏn 13:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Codex of Santa Catarina Ixtepeji[edit]

Take a look. I think the NPOV is a red herring, since each item is sourced. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK 1D[edit]

Hello, I want to nominate the One Direction article (its now WP:GA) for the main page how do i go about this thoughts? AdabowtheSecond (talk) 15:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Get it to featured or get WP:ITN. Those are the "easiest" two options. --LauraHale (talk) 21:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and do you think it has chance? AdabowtheSecond (talk) 00:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
However i just read the article and One Direction isn't really in the news for anything noteworthy right now, they made U.S. chart history in April 2012 AdabowtheSecond (talk) 00:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unless 1D has been expanded in the past 5 days to be five times longer than it was, then not eligible for DYK. You can get mentions of 1D through featured picture if you can find one. Other options are to write Wikinews stories and get mentioned there, or get it to appear as a DYK on simple:One Direction but not manyy options for English Wikipedia. --LauraHale (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all the advice AdabowtheSecond (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Can you revisit Template:Did you know nominations/I Will Be and Template:Did you know nominations/List of number-one R&B singles of 2011 (U.S.) please. Aaron • You Da One 10:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably tomorrow morning at the earliest. Some one else can finish off the review too. Doesn't bother me. --LauraHale (talk) 10:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So you're just leaving me with unfinished nominations? Aaron • You Da One 10:45, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As I have been told many times, anyone can take up a review but since you want the reviews from me tonight, while I'm trying to get some things done before going away for five days/three nights, yes, I'm leaving you with unfinished nominations that will have to wait for another reviewer to finish them. If you want another reviewer, you can ask for one on Wikipedia talk:Did You Know. --LauraHale (talk) 10:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well it would have been nice to be notified. Aaron • You Da One 11:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I lost a DYK because I didn't have a review done in a timely manner. I've also been repeatedly told the original reviewer is under ZERO obligation to finish a review when there were issues. That I repeatedly followed up on your review when you wanted to argue and argue about your hook accuracy was beyond what is really required. You nominated several DYKs that were clearly not ready. A lot of DYK works on developing a reputation for doing good reviews, for repeatedly submitting articles that do not have issues, for participating in DYK related discussions. You do not build good will when... well, you're doing what you're doing. I do NOT have to revisit your review. I do not need to notify you that I wasn't going to do it. I'm really not going to spend the time on some one who doesn't appreciate how much work I've already done for them. --LauraHale (talk) 11:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well tbh you took an exasperated stance toward me when I said I didn't know how to set up that checker, and someone else explained instead. I know you're not obligated to tell me that you want to abandon a review, but it would have been helpful just to leave a note saying "I'm going on holiday, you need to find someone else to do it." That would be good will. I never said I don't appreciate you reviewing my DYK's, at the same time, I've also reviewed yours. I won't reply to any further comment and I won't see it as I don't have you watch listed. Have a nice trip. Aaron • You Da One 11:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going on holiday. Why did you think I was going on holiday? It would be nice if you had 1) read the nomination criteria and made sure did everything as right as possible especially after the first time, 2) fixed things when brought up rather than argue about how it isn't true, 3) decided to pay for me to go on holiday that you've mentioned I'm going on, 4) realised that this sort of behavior that you're continuing to engage in will make it more difficult for your DYKs going forward. --LauraHale (talk) 11:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paralympians[edit]

Like this? When I write about people younger than myself I always feel inadequate. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice. :D See how easy that was? ;) Only five more to go. :D --LauraHale (talk) 19:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to my reading, two more. A table tennis player and an athletics competitor. It appears some of them dropped out/were dropped. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012[edit]

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review[edit]

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 July 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Kayla Clarke[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Kayla Clarke at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ruby 2010/2013 04:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK needing checks[edit]

Hi Laura, If you have time, could you please review Template:Did you know nominations/McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in Australian service? I think that it should be pretty straightforward, but of course let me know if you spot any problems. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Esther Overton[edit]

Hi Laura: Did you actually want this one saved to run during the Paralympics? I was about to take it out of Prep 4 based on the posting at WT:DYK but thought I'd better check with you first. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings My article is 7 days old at the moment. It is brand new and fresh. I missed the 5 days deadline for it to be "DYK". May I still get the opportunity to nominate it as DYK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guptakhy (talk • contribs) 19:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vegetarian Finch[edit]

Hi Laura: I've done my QPQ (Bultfonteinite) so Vegetarian Finch should be good to go! MeegsC (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

I just requested autopatrolled status for you. Did you get your dissertation done? Should I start calling you Dr. Hale now? Bgwhite (talk) 08:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I had it but if not, thanks. :) Thesis submitted two weeks. Need to wait 6 weeks to 3 months to get feedback on it. (Aussie system is different.) Will happen soon enough. :) (In the mean time, I do Wikipedia and Wikinews stuff about Paralympians and female Olympians.) --LauraHale (talk) 08:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Geneviève Labrosse[edit]

Hi Laura, I think that I have addressed all your concerns and the article on Jeanne Geneviève Labrosse is now fixed, it is most certainly improved. Regards. Chienlit (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. --LauraHale (talk) 05:49, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dock Ellis[edit]

Can you please return to the DYK nomination when you get a chance? Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:18, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. --LauraHale (talk) 05:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Alimuddin (cricketer).
Message added ZiaKhan 20:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Some one else dealt with it. --LauraHale (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar hooks?[edit]

Laura, I don't think you ever got back to those two Gibraltar DYK hooks under July 5, which were initial reviews by you and the most recent issues you brought up are said to have been addressed. Just a quick ping, since I noticed them waiting for a response. (Found one of my own tonight unaddressed for over a week, and just waiting for a tick. Oops.) BlueMoonset (talk) 04:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --LauraHale (talk) 05:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Rajivranprasad's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

thanks for helping me in creating a page on archer coach purnima mahato.

i was struggling to create a page and every time it was rejected citing my article as essay. i was wondering why my article is rejected. now i understand that. thanks and best regards--rajivranprasad

No problem. You just wandered in at a time when i had the time to work on it. Hopefully, it gives you an idea how to write similar articles going forward. --LauraHale (talk) 21:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK reviews[edit]

Laura, I'm finally back, and going through some older DYKs, tagging for new reviewers and the like. I found the following which you had been reviewing:

If I find any others, I'll let you know. Thanks for taking care of those Gibraltars! —BlueMoonset (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me on this one. This is another one of those cases where things have gone south with the nominator. (Check my talk page archives.) I'll post a request for a second opinion. --LauraHale (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That looked pretty toxic; I don't blame you for bowing out.
Can I ask you to take another look at Barbecue Nation? I've fixed a couple of your problems with the article, and would be happy for you to adjust the third phrase in the article to suit your taste. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nominations[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Alethea Sedgman at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Robyn van Nus at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AWM photography[edit]

In response to your post at WP:AWNB, I'd like to put my hand up for further information on the photography session at the AWM. However, its more likely than not that I won't be able to attend, so don't etch me in stone for anything :P -- saberwyn 09:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Talkback[edit]

^ Template:Did you know nominations/Agneta Matthes & Agneta Park. ⇒TAP 10:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • ^^ (done again) :p ⇒TAP 10:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tsilla Chelton[edit]

Thank you for the notice, I replied. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 14:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Fayedizard's talk page.
Message added 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fayedizard (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yuderqui Contreras DYK[edit]

Hey, the article about Yuderqui Contreras you commented before is in the DYK process. But I already have another DYK, is this possible? I have read that I should fix the lead and the personal information in order to get GA status. Thanks again for your comments. Osplace 18:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012[edit]

NZ Olympians[edit]

You may or may not be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/NZ/Olympians. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


100 DYK Nominations[edit]

The 100 DYK Nomination Medal
Congratulations on having over 100 DYK nominations! What a fabulous effort! Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Slow down, damnit! You're making the rest of us look bad! err.. Congratulations! Resolute 01:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs, Laura has now also past 200. Bloody marvellous. John Vandenberg (chat) 06:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
With a little assistance at User:LauraHale/Paralympians, I can probably cross the 300 line. :) I've started prepping 68 of them. (Working on adding information to the Athletics articles today.) The more help I can get, the easier it will be. The major hurdle there won't actually be writing but having the QPQ to nominate them all and the time to move them over. --LauraHale (talk) 06:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bingo. :D I need them to just keep up with my Olympians and then I will really need them for the Paralympians. If I do a peel off for the multihooked ones, I might be able to just squeeze out the Paralympians with out doing any more... but still PITA. Goal is to find at least one source per athletics competitor tonight, then do some more reviewing... Going to shoot for at least another 5. Mild fear that none of the HOPAU participants will help with the DYKs and I'll be doing all the writing on my own. (By the way, we'll need a special Paralympic prep area when I go for that.) --LauraHale (talk) 07:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've heard a rumor there is a crisco hook in every DYK prep area. :D We'll see the level of flipping that goes on. :) Finished writing goal for the day so DYK reviewing time starts again. ;) --LauraHale (talk) 08:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, I saw that. Since they are really different aspects of the country, I doubt there'd be any controversy. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've been a bit surprised that there hasn't been any complaints about the number of Australian sportpeople. They complain about the USA and UK based hooks often enough. --LauraHale (talk) 08:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It allows the rest of the world to just get on with editing the Pedia. ;) I keep watching the main page talk page looking to see if it will happen. I was hoping others would help overwhelm the sheer number of DYKs about Aussie Olympians I've been running. (People moving to the prep area may want to consider pre-loading some to prevent this as jamming is going to happen.) --LauraHale (talk) 09:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • We may just have to boost the number of hooks available, or some can be put up before the Olympics as interest will be building then any way. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a non-fussy person, I don't have a preference. :) If it is easier to run them early, then mine can go early. It MIGHT be easier to up the hooks from 7 to 8 and plan for two Olympic hooks per set. (It would be nice to try to get some of the scheduling planned in advance though as it relates to competition.) --LauraHale (talk) 09:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


200 DYK Nominations[edit]

The 200 DYK Nomination Medal
Congratulations on having over 200 articles appear on the front page! Looks like you are well on the way to 500. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Content Review Medal[edit]

The Content Review Medal of Merit  
For your work on reviewing Did You Know? articles, I am delighted to award you the Content Review Medal of Merit Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lindsay Sutton[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Esther Overton[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ballarat Miners[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

The DYK Medal
For all the hard work you do on DYK, and especially your efforts related to organizing the Olympic DYK schedule, I hereby award you this medal. Keep up the great work! ThaddeusB (talk) 00:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Job Attitude[edit]

Greetings. Sufficient changes have been made for the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_attitude for it to be reconsidered for a DYK nomination as instructed by your recommendations. Kindly check and reconsider. Thank you. Khyati Gupta (talk) 20:23, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Ichirizuka[edit]

This one could use a revisit to see whether it now complies. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. Any more I need to follow up on? --LauraHale (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jessica Trengove[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Jessica Trengove at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 02:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Basement12's talk page.
Message added 09:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Basement12 (T.C) 09:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic DYK[edit]

Hi Laura. I haven't been following the Olympic DYK set up. I just finished this: Template:Did you know nominations/Marlena Wesh. And was wondering if you could see if I put it in the right spot, move it if necessary, keep an eye on it, etc. I put it under 4 August. I'd appreciate it. Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 19:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!PumpkinSky talk 21:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elisa Barnard[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Purnima Mahato[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overloaded: The Singles Collection[edit]

Hello LauraHale, I have expanded the article. Can you please check if it meets the 700 word requirement. Thanks. Till I Go Home 12:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Rachel Bugg issues[edit]

Laura, I'm sorry, but I had to pull this from a prep area due to significant prose issues, especially in the third Diving paragraph. The explanation is in the template, and I hope you can get them cleared up in short order so it can go back into a prep area in a matter of hours. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if the revised third paragraph I just posted works for you. I omitted the 2012 Australian Diving Championship because of the discrepancy between sources: ABC seems to place Bugg alone as fifth and the Bugg/Wiggins pair as first, while Diving Australia lists second place finishes in both events. You do cite the ABC sources for these, but the disagreement between your primary source and this one left me unwilling to mention placement, especially as a fifth place is not so notable under the circumstances in a national competition given a fourth place international finish in Rostock. I also left out the 22nd place finish for notability reasons. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What notability reasons? If I was determined to take it to GA, this information would be stuff that people wanted and it would be viewed as kind of fanboyism to only post her best results. Whatever though. If you can now give it the green tick to go, that would be appreciated as I addressed your concerns. --LauraHale (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PS: TonytheTiger has revised his Tora Harris article to say four championships rather than six; if that was the only outstanding issue, it may be ready for your approval. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:20, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vivian Tan[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amy Clay[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amanda Spratt[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs[edit]

Could you please review Template:Did you know nominations/Tora Harris and then take a look at Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Cabral‎ and Template:Did you know nominations/Augie Wolf.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Shara Gillow[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Donn Cabral[edit]

I have rvised the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Becchara Palmer[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Brittany Broben[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Rebecca McDonnell[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Rebecca McDonnell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 01:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Ellis Coleman[edit]

I have done one more: Template:Did you know nominations/Ellis Coleman.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:29, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast response. Can you also approve the ALT hook I just added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. If you get the chance to look at some of my Paralympic hooks, that would be good. (And if you're interested, Wikinews and the Paralympics would be good. The project might be helpful for your poker related stuff as an alternative place to write about that. Beyond that, if we can successfully do the Paralympics, it helps in terms of going after the Olympics.) --LauraHale (talk) 06:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Anabelle Smith[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jodie Schulz[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Nick-D's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:DYK nomination review request[edit]

No worries, I think with the Games now started I'm going to get a second wind on DYK's!

I thought of you on Thursday as I live in London and a colleague said he spent an underground journey talking to the Australian kayak team as they were heading back to the Olympic village - my immediate thought was "argh! you could have taken some photos!".

Speaking of which, I'm going to a couple of events and was hoping to take some shots for Wiki, but read the interview on the signpost. Do you know if we are allowed to use photos taken at the Games or not? It seems a bit odd as I know we've got photos from Beijing on multiple articles and loads of images from British sporting events (heck, I uploaded some from Wimbledon earlier in the year). Would be nice to know as I'm off to the beach volleyball on Tuesday (sadly missing the British team as our tickets are for the later session, so won't be able to add images to the articles I created for them), but the big one is that I have tickets for the final session of the swimming with the two major relays - so I was hoping to go a bit trigger happy there. Miyagawa (talk) 10:51, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nominations[edit]

I will be leaving to go out of town on a day trip in 45 minutes. I expect to be gone and offline for 12 hours.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:48, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is a long list. Are any of your hooks Olympic hooks? Are any of them for July?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will do some in August. I have a bunch of things I want to get done by the end of the month, some of it offline.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prep 2[edit]

There were no Olympic hooks left for July 30 so I put three of your para hooks into Prep 2 just now. Two had no save request and one had one but with a ? at the end. I hope this is okay, if not I or someone else can undo. PumpkinSky talk 13:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chris Burton (equestrian)[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Miro Sipek[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Power Play (Cheers)[edit]

Why did you tag one of sentences as "uncited"? I thought that I broadly interpretted the episode. --George Ho (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ping; you have replies at Template:Did you know nominations/Sam, Derek, and Diane in Cheers. --George Ho (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You've passed ALT1, but you can check other alts that are not struck out for promoter's sake. --George Ho (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC) Never mind. Well, there's no need to report errors, as it passed, so I'll let this slide. --George Ho (talk) 01:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hannah Vermeersch[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Phoebe Stanley[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elizabeth Patrick[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sally Kehoe[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alexandra Hagan[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Renee Chatterton[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tess Gerrand[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jade Neilsen[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Brittany Elmslie[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing concerns for Food extrusion DYK[edit]

Hi there, I've replied to your comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Food extrusion. Thanks for reviewing it. Mindmatrix 02:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cannon Fodder DKYs[edit]

I think I've fixed the Cannon Fodder 2 issues. I'm halfway through the 1st one, will fix it later today. bridies (talk) 04:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added cites for all the various Cannon Fodder ports (in the infobox). I'm not seeing any remaining issues with the Cannon Fodder 2 article. bridies (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Esther and Kwesi Armah[edit]

Hi Laura, thanks for the feedback on Template:Did you know nominations/Esther Armah, Kwesi Armah. I added a few citations for both articles and hope they address your concerns. Cmprince (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Carli Renzi[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Amber Merritt at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help regarding the Jade Bailey (footballer) article from the DYK reviewer. Well, it's worth a try...[edit]

I am the creator of the article Jade Bailey (footballer) and you reviewed the DYK. But I also note that you have written women's sports articles in your own right. So I came here hoping to ask for help in expanding it because you presumably know what you're doing. I don't know enough about footballers to do a good article here. I need 1500 characters to get it past http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Jade_Bailey_(footballer) . Would you care to help? Failing that, could you point out somebody who can? Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 12:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lucinda Whitty[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Olivia Price[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nina Curtis[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Price (gymnast)[edit]

Can you please take another look at this one? I had found a problem with the surviving hook, but the creator says the issues with both hooks have now been addressed.

I also suggested another ALT at Rachel Lovell, since you seemed unhappy with my previous suggestion. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Krystal Weir[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Olympic Dam Airport[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Cabral‎ Alt hook[edit]

Could you please review the ALT hook added to Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Cabral‎.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Reyes and Duarte[edit]

Hi there, I responded to your comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of María José Reyes and Juan Duarte. Cheers. --Diego Grez (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Olympic BLPs[edit]

Hi, thanks, but at the moment am just exercising my language knowledge to check for mispelled names. Adding sources is part of verifying the spelling, but my interest is anthroponymy, not sports I'm afraid. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bronwen Watson[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rachel Bugg[edit]

Orlady (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Center Square/Hudson–Park Historic District[edit]

Daniel Case has added the sourcing, and Orlady has come up with a shorter ALT to replace the overlong ALT1, so it's ready for you to check again. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Your hook for Melissa Breen, first in the Olympics section, has gotten a ? from Orlady. I imagine it will be a fairly easy fix, but the sooner it's done, the sooner it can go into a prep area. I don't know whether she's actually competing on August 2, but the just-opened and only empty prep area will run early on the 3rd in Australia. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hayley Chapman[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Hanna[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Josie Tomic[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012[edit]

Overloaded: The Singles Collection[edit]

Article is now 1890+ words. Till I Go Home 13:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you there? Till I Go Home 10:32, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Yeah. Will go look. --LauraHale (talk) 10:33, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, believe I fixed the link. Till I Go Home 10:44, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanished_user_adhmfdfmykrdyr/Archive_10&oldid=1090612389"