User:MisterGugaruz/Dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Weylaway (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Zorrotesla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – WP:NOTHERE Has not made any worthwhile contributions in 157 edits, and clearly has no intentions of leaving userspace. Has made 18 sandboxes and various number of templates, some benign and nonobjectionable (like this one User:Zorrotesla/Templates/Trouts/Colonel , whereas many others (all others?) should be nuked ( User:Zorrotesla/sandbx18, [[1]], [[2]] [[3]] and so on. While the user has not been warned against such behavior, I think 150+ edits shows clear intent of their actions not to contribute. Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1006:b000::/40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) Continued block-evasion by WP:LTA/D86. Resumed vandalism as soon as 6-month partial block from userspace expired see Special:PageHistory/User:Jrobb525/Body. Also vandalizing Yarona FM [4], [5]. Partial anon-block from userspace needs to reinstated with a longer duration with pageblock from Yarona FM added, Draftspace was also briefly added on [6] but it's not clear if that is needed for now. Please do not protect any pages just yet as these preferred targets act as a honeypot to see which ranges are abused frequently enough to be worth blocking once collateral is considered. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:7CD6:79D3:66A2:19E2 (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Seo waqar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Soteria (psychiatric treatment): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Adding their website at various articles after final warning. Knitsey (talk) 22:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Parveen Sharma sspm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Techmods (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. Linkspammer. MrOllie (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Icon Abebe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- 98.116.128.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. LR.127 (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Fatman4life (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a offensive username Avishai11 (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- PYRATES CONFRATERNITY (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage and https://web.archive.org/web/20230626195754/https://humbleandobedientyouths.org/about/. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: UPE user 'Acrosstheriver21' was blocked in 2021 after making COI edits to this article. Since then a series of Northern Italian based IP addresses have been editing this article in a disruptive fashion. Statements by the user on the relevant IP talk pages indicate that this is the same user, evading the block. Disruption continues and, since the film will shortly be released, further disruption can be expected. Some form of page protection would seem preferable to playing IP whack-a-mole. Further detail can be found in the relevant discussion at WP:COIN Axad12 (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding the issue above…
- Given the similarity of other interests (articles relating to the Raikes family and vandalism of the page for Will Johns[7]) it would seem to be plausible that the user involved above is the same as the one involved in this sockpuppet investigation[8].
- If so, the user is a veteran of at least 8 different blocked accounts and 2 blocked IP addresses.
- Maybe also worth protecting the articles for Will Johns (to stop vandalism), and Raikes, Raymond Raikes and Geoffrey Raikes (to dissuade against block evasion via IP addresses)? Axad12 (talk) 09:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- +1 This has been happening for a long time. Across the River and into the Trees should also be protected. See WP:COIN#Across the River and into the Trees (film). C F A 💬 15:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Wiki-battle over the last several days including what appears to be a death threat, against the backdrop of extreme tension in Bangladesh. I suggest that protecting the page until the situation calms down would be helpful. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long-term vandalism by IPs, for years as far as I remember relating to a point on involvement of Pakistani general. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- you are aware that there are editors with opinions that different than yours yes?
- why not talk and get to the middle ground?
- its seams that the edits the IP user have made were resalable sine Pakistan iniid provide financial aid.
- could you please elaborate why is it important to you to censor this fact? 109.66.110.43 (talk) 13:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeat tendentious behaviour by an alleged sockpuppet currrently under investigation (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wisdom-inc. Multiple editors have reverted his/her additions, so it's not simply a disagreement with one editor. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon IP jumper has been reverted by several of us multiple times. Perhaps a week of protection will stop the issue. It's not an article that is edited a heap. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. @Fyunck(click): Please try to make greater efforts to explain these types of reversions in your edit summaries. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- My fault there. In defense this hopping IP is doing this to multiple Disney articles over the last month and my patience is waning. Check out the Winnie the Pooh movies where i told them "Bring it to talk... this is like all other disney animated features". Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended protection: Updating quickly - vandalism very likely. Also, aren't all 2024 Election-related Articles protected? Avishai11 (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is premature. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: False information about it was Posted today. Want page protected before that information is brought back/any more misinformation is brought in. 2600:6C46:6800:21F8:A1A4:41BB:F7D9:A371 (talk) 19:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One drive-by vandal edit isn't enough for protection. Acroterion (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The vandalism was inaccurate information. This page NEEDS to be protected so none happens again. 2600:6C46:6800:21F8:A1A4:41BB:F7D9:A371 (talk) 21:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- We don't protect articles over a single incident. If we did that, almost every article would be protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The vandalism was inaccurate information. This page NEEDS to be protected so none happens again. 2600:6C46:6800:21F8:A1A4:41BB:F7D9:A371 (talk) 21:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: To control vandalism. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Page has a history of disruptive editing/vandalism by IPs. Also it's a contentious topic as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 21:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: All 2024 U.S. Presidential campaigns are protected (most have Extended). Harris announced she is running for POTUS, so her campaign's page should be protected. If not extended, then at least Semi. Avishai11 (talk) 20:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- barley any disruptive editing. Roadlover23e4321 (talk) 20:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by multi-IP user. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Request 2 week semi-protection. Various IP edits adding unsourced information. Information is readded after being reverted. Msw1002 (talk) 22:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
there is a typo in the word "legitamate" in the latest change, change from: "'The concept of the Intifada, which contains the idea of a legitimate protest against oppression, is currently a key concept in the Arab world and has a great emotional appeal'"
to
"'The concept of the Intifada, which contains the idea of a rebellion against oppression, is currently a key concept in the Arab world and has a great emotional appeal'" it should be removed (or replaced it with the word "violent")
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1234689505&oldid=1234146986&title=Intifada 109.66.110.43 (talk) 13:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done – This edit consists of a literal translation of a reference. While I am not fluent in German, nothing in the text indicates that it should translate with the word "violent". The reference contains the German word "legitimen", meaning "legitimate". By my reading, the translation made in this edit is correct. Garsh (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request that... (We are able to take all the hearsay out of this Article. I have been watching her videos on youtube and a lot of the information she is providing is basic and extremely healthy. Any doctor whos ever prescribed anything could be classified as doing something extremely dangerous.. look at america atm.. nothing wrong with barbara. Clean this page up please. Btw she said for me to use castor oil on my dermatitis and it worked, 20 years of nothing working that doctors and dermatologist perscribed and here i am, my serrabhorbic dermatitis and rosacea have gotten better) . 114.30.104.246 (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment:: How can a nonexistent article contain "hearsay"? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator[edit] |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 10:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Hello good day, may I request the autopatroller rights? Although I just have 17 articles so far of course one is deleted. I mostly write biographies, movies, and history. These articles are free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Thank you. |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie (talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I'm Bugnawfang. Lately, I have been editing on articles about some places in the Philippines. Recently, however, the Negros Island Region was created again after a law was signed by the president of the Philippines. Hence, there are 19 cities and 44 municipalities' pages that still have the old "Central Visayas (Region VII)" and "Western Visayas (Region VI)" region template tags. I am aware that my edits do not meet the threshold, but I do want to update these pages, and making edits one-by-one on these pages is tedious on its own. With this, I may request for the permission to use AWB to add the "Negros Island Region" template on these pages. Bugnawfang (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Been on hiatus for a couple of years and my access was revoked. I used to enjoy using the typo fixing facility and might like to try it again. John (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Unflagged bot under test hitting editfilters. Requesting confirmed rights to prevent this, and to allow clerking of Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2. See BRFA. Mdann52 (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I am requesting confirmed rights because I am trying to create a new page however I can't do that without confirmed/auto- confirmed permissions. Pemguincraft (talk) 22:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I would like to able to participate in the discussion on this talk page. As I feel the article has non neutrally written content in it (which also have inciteful implications) time is of the essence. I'm participating in good faith and I would only need it for a short period (probably not more than a few days) and only for that talk page. Emdosis (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I meet the criteria but am not in the extended confirmed group. Amisom (talk) 23:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Good day. I am requesting to be granted the New Page Reviewer permission to assist with the growing new page backlog. I have created 8 new articles (although one was a complete rewrite that I then pushed through AfC) and meet the edit and age requirements for this permission. I also have demonstrated experience in the AfC process in both articles and redirects and have some experience in deletion related areas. I maintain rollback and pending change permissions, both of which I use regularly. I believe I can (and will) be of assistance in reducing the NPP backlog, if given the opportunity. Thank you. Garsh (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Ahola .O (talk) 10:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Hello good day, may I request a new page reviewer? While I have created only 17 articles (one deleted), I have spent more than 90 days with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. If granted this right, it will make my edits easier. Thank you.
I actively edit article and patrol "recent changes" to fight vandalism using ultraviolet and twinkle, I also created and help expanding a few articles. I notice that very high backlog and want to help with that. I want to help with Philippine related, Anime related, and Japan related articles. Thanks. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, my page mover privilege has just expired, after 90 days of what I believe to have been productive use in NPP and AFC. Could it be extended please? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I am well familiar with the Wikipedia Copyright violations, Wikipedia Biographies of living persons and much more of Verifiability to other subject aside humans. My main focus are on the WikiProject Nigeria and little works from other Wikiproject. Reason being so I don't get occupied with other subject am not 100% familiar with their source such as Indian and the rest. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I watch recent changes often for vandalism and problematic edits, and understand the difference between the two when reverting them. I've also reviewed the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. I hope this right can help me more effectively perform anti-vandal work. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello! I would like to request rollback rights as I've been pretty active in countering vandalism since May. I use Twinkle and I notify new users consistently when I revert, usually by using a warn template, but other times by writing a message myself. I do my best to distinguish between good faith edits and vandalism and avoid unnecessary edit wars. Having made around 20 successful AIV reports, I am interested in making patrolling quicker with Huggle. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 22:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, at this point I think I’m ready to fight vandalism and make good rollback edits, I really need this tools to be giving me to me, I’m an experienced editor and I think some editors are really not doing justice in terms of there edits, I want to use the tools to revert some edits that shouldn't be Madeforall1 (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying for the role of rollbacker, having been a Wikipedia user for over 10 years and being increasingly active in the last few years. In this vein, I feel that I have undone my fair share of vandalism and, being mainly focused on football/sports articles, vandalism and unconstructive/unsourced edits are very common in my area of interest and editing. I believe that these rights will be very useful in maximising the efficiency of my work on Wikipedia and will save me time from undoing separate edits individually. Additionally, I have past experience as an administrator on a Wikia project, where I made use of the rollback feature and have good knowledge of its positives and when to utilise it. Thank you for taking your time to review my request. Kind regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I regularly monitor the "new page" feed now for about 2 months now, I actively warn users when I revert their edits thanks to twinkle and ultraviolet and actively report the clear vandals and spam accounts. I want to access the rollback rights to make reverting easier as I have slow internet. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
I'm requesting template editor privileges due to recent changes that classify parts of the Template:Occupation_by_nationality_and_century_category_header as high risk [14]. I developed this template to help manage occupation categories and have become quite familiar with template syntax over the past year, though I do not consider myself an expert. My expertise lies more in R programming, which I teach as part of a data science class. I meet nearly all the requirements for template editor privileges, except for having syntax requests implemented in other high-risk templates. While I have edited templates that have become high risk, I acknowledge that this is not the same. However, I have made a sizable number of technical contributions to RegExTypoFix, primarily in optimizing the regular expression. This is the code underlying the spellchecker used by AWB to implement uncontroversial misspellings. If necessary, I am willing to find and suggest syntax changes to further demonstrate my capabilities. Mason (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm requesting template editor permission for some edits related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships. I meet all of the guidelines and have held template editor permission in the past (see Special:UserRights/RP88 and Special:PermaLink/805154993 for original grant), but previous template editor permission was dropped during a period of inactivity on my part. I am not sure if it is relevant to en.WP, but as a Commons administrator I have made hundreds of edits to the restricted templates/modules in the Commons Module and Template namespaces. —RP88 (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC) |