User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fast N' Loud (season 16) (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Fast N' Loud (season 16) instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jax 0677! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Stuntin on You

It's not a song, so shouldn't be catted as a song, so what would you suggest I do? Cheers. Thanks. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC) PS: I thought that referred to text, not project boxes. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Richhoncho:, a single is more than likely a song, and is likely a hip hop single, therefore, if {{song}} can not be used, {{WPHH}} should probably be used. Also, please link to the page in question when you post on a talk page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't think you understood my point. It is simply that a misspelling, miscapitalisation or, as in this case, a mispunctuation is NOT a song, therefore it should not be project tagged as such. I suppose adding WPHH moves it, but does not solve the underlying problem. I mean, what is the point of adding a 'please curate me' tag to something that does not need curating? Do you have another suggestion? Thanks. No need to tag me, I will watch this space until the conversation is over. --Richhoncho (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply - Since it is a misspelling, I just changed the contents of that page to a redirect. Please see {{Uw-blank1}}. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hellcat Records

Template:Hellcat Records has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. czar 02:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Rock Solid Talent Entertainment

I am looking for an article to be made for Rock Solid Talent Entertainment we have artists and bands with wikipedia pages as well as done a lot of notable work over the years with mainstream bands. 5 years ago the label was salted and only an admin can create one. I understand trying to create myself was the problem. I am learning small edits but it takes an admin to create our page Thank you for any help. Philip H Taylor (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)


Hi Jax 0677 It is salted and it say only an admin can create an article and being owner of the label I believe I am to close to the label. I guess I will just have to go without an article we will just appear as a red link on all our bands wikipedia pages. Thank you for your reply and sorry to waste your time. Philip H Taylor (talk) 13:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Philip H Taylor:, I understand your concern. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia created by volunteers who work on other things in addition to this project. The more notorious Rock Solid Talent Entertainment becomes, the more likely it will be to have an article. To be frank, I can not find many independent sources discussing the label in depth. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Ace Frehley Origins Vol. 1

Hey there -

I'm trying to change the title of Ace's Origins, Vol. 1 to Origins Vol. 1. I think since you created the page I can't make that happen, or possibly because it's a redirect? Not sure as this is the first time I'm running into the issue.

Thx in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whigged (talk • contribs) 21:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Ballerini

Oops. Sorry about that - late night editing on phone, while stub-sorting. PamD 23:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Well I did just think that in this case it might be obvious - but yes, good practice in general to link to the much-travelled Ballerini (Album), for the sake of talk page watchers. PamD 23:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

What's the point of a move like this? You even state you know it's wrong in your edit summary. You're not helping the situation at all because a correction still had to made. You're just moving an one improper disambiguated title to another. If you can't move an article to the proper title yourself, all you have to do is tag the title it should be at with {{db-move}}. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, I moved the article, because the title "Ballerini (Kelsea Ballerina album)" is absolutely incorrect. When someone types a title with different case into the search box, it shows the correct title. When it is typed with different letters, the correct article does not show up. Therefore, when someone types "Ballerini (Album)" or "Ballerini (album)", it will more easily go to the same place. Moving the article to "Ballerini (Album)" makes it easier to find until the move is made. To start out, I moved the article from my user space to "Ballerini (Kelsea Ballerini album)", the best available article title that was available at that time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Pointless. It's wrong to fix a mistake with another mistake. Let the admins handle it, it doesn't take that long that others won't be able to find what they are looking for. Most people will find it just by typing Ballerini. If you're going to do something the wrong way, you may as well just perform a copy/paste at the correct title and request a histmerge. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, exactly. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, "When a cut-and-paste move is done, the page history of an article or talk page can be split among two or more different pages. This is highly undesirable, because we need to keep the history with the content for copyright reasons." --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, exactly. That's what I said. It would be wrong to do that, but a histmerge will fix the histories. And it's wrong to do an unnecessary move that's going to have to be fixed anyway. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • My original point stands. In the future, a db-move request will suffice. It will be fixed in no time and common misspellings are acceptable redirects. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Untitled Section

Hello,

Why you have changed the Template of Bobby Mcferrin Studio album section, which was updated by me by adding those studio albums which was not mentioned earlier? 

- Ashis Mitra

Kolkata

India

Hi,

You have deleted also the my added studio albums of Petula Clark. Why are you doing this repeatedly? 

- Ashis Mitra, kolkata, India

Kenosha RfClosure

Jax, Why are you initiating so many RfC with respect to the Kenosha protest article? Springee (talk) 14:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

@Starship.paint: as admin on RfClosure page. Jax 0677, as you are uninvolved with discussions on the Talk:Kenosha_unrest page, why are you continuing to request unnecessary closures? I asked you about this above when you placed, IIRC, over a dozen closure requests. You added another today [[1]] to a discussion that doesn't seem to need one. Flooding the noticeboard with these requests simply slows the process for requests where a closure really is needed. Please stop. Springee (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - I refrained from requesting closure about the "Biography" section, because it is small. I have eliminated requests for archived sections from WP:ANFRC. Hopefully, discussions will start being archived soon. "Can we include in the Responses section that CNN covered the events" sounds like something that can be closed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
    • There is no reason to close them. If someone wants to reply next week that's fine. Why are we in any hurry to close discussions just to archive them? If you want topics to go into the archives faster change the auto archive settings. But, more importantly, talk to the involved editor first! That talk page has only nine topics. Why do we need anyone to force closure to any of the discussions? Springee (talk) 03:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Springee:, I requested one day archiving, but that got shot down. The talk page is still over 100 kB, and was up over 300 kB at one point. Sometimes, the conversations will go on indefinitely if the discussion does not get closed. People who review WP:ANFRC can decide whether or not a particular discussion needs to continue, or can be closed. One day archiving, or otherwise closing old discussions are ways to reduce the size of a talk page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • This isn't an excessively long page. No one on the page is requesting these discussions get closed so what problem are you trying to solve? We shouldn't spam the request for close board to try to deal with a talk page that is too long in the opinion of an editor who isn't involved with the talk page. Springee (talk) 18:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Springee:, I respectfully disagree. If you let me know which of the discussions should not remain at WP:ANFRC, I will look into that discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I suggest you go to the talk page and ask editors there. Asking to archive discussions you aren't involved with seems like a questionable idea to me. Springee (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @Springee: - (1) I'm not an admin, and don't want to be one. I was just participating on that page because I myself requested other closures. (2) I don't think it's questionable to request closures of uninvolved discussions. (3) That said, the spate of Kenosha requests was a bit too much, I did get a sense that some of the closure requests by Jax 0677 were not needed. My opinion, from reading the Kenosha requests, was that closures were generally only needed in discussions that had voting (because specific proposals would be there). Certainly, unneeded closure requests causing a backlog is a problem. starship.paint (talk) 13:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Burn it All for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burn it All is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burn it All until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heiko Gerber (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Facts

Please look at the Tatumreport.com leaked information on the case. You will see why no charges following the AG's investigation. #yourmyrtersarecriminals — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.35.105 (talk) 19:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Warbringer Template

Hey there! I see that you reverted my addition of the unlinked Weapons of Tomorrow album in the Warbringer template. I'm in the process of fleshing out the article for it, so it shouldn't be linked, but it is one of their albums and it seems incorrect to leave its very existence off of the template, especially given that all of the band members are also unlinked. NoahTheDuke (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @NoahTheDuke:, {{Warbringer}} is a navbox, not an infobox, therefore, only albums with articles should be linked. Also, please link to the page in question when posting on a talk page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transdigm Group Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Transdigm Group Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Update tag

Why is it so hard for you to simply update a template instead of expecting someone else to do it like you did on Template:G.E.M. You obviously know exactly what is missing or else you would not be tagging it, while someone else would have to figure out what is missing (especially since you never add anything to the talk page to inform other editors as to what presicely is missing). This is just another example of your abuse of tags. For someone who loves to work on and add templates to articles, this seems like you can do this yourself and not be another area where it shows your lack of willingness to be a cooperative member of this project. You expect more from others than of yourself. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, whoever is creating the articles needs to add the navbox to the page, and add the article to the navbox. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
    • That's not how it works. This is a collaborative effort. Not everyone who works on articles is interested in or even understands navboxes. You can be nice and leave a polite personal message on their talk page, too, to help them out instead of a passive-aggressive template message. If you notice something and you know what's wrong with it, fix it. That's being part of a community. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, tags such as {{otd}}, {{ods}}, {{+r}} and {{+rs}} would not exist if they should not be used. For engineering drawings, when too many things to list are changed between revisions, the description of changes might read "Extensively Revised". --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

RfC close

Hi Jax, please see Special:Diff/985471823. --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

redicrect help

Hi, I have no idea how to do a redirect. Could you remove the Chris Dale redirect, it should not go to Tank. thanks! Yellowxander (talk) 19:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Yellowxander:, I think this is done. Do you need anything else? --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Chris Dale

Hi Jax 0677. I note that you created the above as a redirect to Tank (band) after the "delete" consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Dale (2nd nomination). I'm not sure I agree this is correct, as there's already a Christopher Dale (disambiguation) page with at least two other Chris Dales mentioned. I'd suggest that redirecting Chris Dale to that disambiguation page, and mentioning the bassist Chris Dale there with a link to Tank (band) would be a better option. Do you have any objections to this? Thanks for your efforts on this! ~ mazca talk 21:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Mazca:, I have no objection to your proposal. Please proceed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry just seen this. A Tank redirect is not recommended. He was a member of the band for a couple of years, not at all integral to the group.Yellowxander (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Jax, and @Yellowxander: - I've retargeted it now and re-mentioned him at Christopher Dale now with links to Atom Seed, which seems to be the project he was most heavily involved with that actually still has an article, and also Tank (band) which seems to be the most actually notable group he's had significant involvement with. Totally unfamiliar with his work, though, so I'm sure someone else might have a different idea. Thanks both! ~ mazca talk 19:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Mazca:, thanks!
Ah yes Atom Seed would be a much better option, Nice one! Yellowxander (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Burn it All for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burn it All is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burn it All (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. T. Canens (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Request for comment

Can you please offer your unbiased opinion on this matter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Requests_for_closure#Talk:Gotse_Delchev#This_article_is_a_parody --StoyanStoyanov80 (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

"Jay Holstein" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jay Holstein. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 13#Jay Holstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Arrest of Roderick Walker

Hello, Jax 0677, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Alexandermcnabb, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arrest of Roderick Walker, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrest of Roderick Walker.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of pipeline accidents in the United States in 1974

Hello Jax 0677,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of pipeline accidents in the United States in 1974 for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

RM

Please see Talk:White Bat (album)#Requested move 26 November 2020. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Forum shopping

I notice that despite being told that we don't host unsourced and copyright spam over and over again, you have tried again at ANI after failing on my talk page and at least two other review pages. Your determination to try to get this hopeless spam back suggests that you are concealing a conflict of interest, which could lead to a block. Please stop Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

  • @Jimfbleak: that might have been partially my fault. At Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Varidesk I said that I wouldn't, but that someone else might. I didn't think Jax would go to AN and DVR though, just that another admin seeing it at WP:REFUND might take a different action. StarM 14:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dispatched

Template:Dispatched has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dive

Template:Dive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Collapsible option

If you add {{collapsible option}} to a navbox, you must add |state = {{{state|}}} as well or this is false documentation. Adding |state = autocollapse is pointless because autocollapse is the default value. You could add |state = {{{state|autocollapse}}} which is equivalent to |state = {{{state|}}} but or |state = autocollapse is pointless. If you don't understand the difference between |state = {{{state|autocollapse}}} and |state = autocollapse let me know so I can explain it to you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Louis gun-toting controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Louis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens (0–9, A–G) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens (0–9, A–G) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens (0–9, A–G) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

"Anti-mob legislation" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anti-mob legislation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 13#Anti-mob legislation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

"B11K" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect B11K. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 16#B11K until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 10 Lives for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 10 Lives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Lives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FalconK (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Bobby Hutcherson discography

Hi Jax 0677,

is it ok with you, when I reorganize the disco of Bobby Hutcherson? I would use a sortable table (and probably a second for side-man sec) with rec and release date, which is obviously interesting in his case. The distinction between the output on the diff labels would also still be possible to sort. MenkinAlRire 19:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - @MenkinAlRire:, please link to the article in question when you post on a talk page. With that said, you do not need my permission. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
    • I know, I just wanted to be polite, you were the originator and established it's style. And yes, I forgot an essential part of the question. Thanks for the reply. MenkinAlRire 03:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hale Global

Hello, Jax 0677. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hale Global".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Eric Church discography

If I'm removing one of your tags, such as on Eric Church discography, it's because I'm working on fixing it. Please give me time to find the sources before auto-reverting me. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, my edit was referred to as "tag bombing", and one can fix the issue before removing the tag, instead of the other way around. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

"Garret Miller" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Garret Miller. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14#Garret Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

"Premium Subscriptions" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Premium Subscriptions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Premium Subscriptions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mo3 (rapper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mo3 (rapper), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jenyire2 20:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

"Lil Bit (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lil Bit (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 5#Lil Bit (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knorkator

Template:Knorkator has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lennart97 (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Leng Tch'e

Template:Leng Tch'e has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lennart97 (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

"Melissa Cross" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Melissa Cross. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 13#Melissa Cross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Arrest of Thomas Jones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arrest of Thomas Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrest of Thomas Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kncny11 (shoot) 15:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind welcome!

Thanks so much for taking the time to read my suggested edits for Graebel Relocation, and also for the warm welcome! I'm excited to continue adding to the community here and will certainly be on the lookout for opportunities to add value to other articles.

Much appreciated!

LFCBookie (talk) 15:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Weinberg

Information icon Hello, Jax 0677. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Weinberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Notability of a discography

Hi. I found Leo Ku discography, which you tagged with Template:Notability a few years back. I'm actually wondering why. The artist himself is clearly notable, and the discography is long enough that it makes sense to spin it off into a separate article. It's unsourced, which is an issue, but it's not a notability issue, right? I'd like to hear your thoughts on it, anyway. Thanks! Lennart97 (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Lennart97:, the burden to add references is on the person who added the material. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
    That's a sourcing issue, and the "unsourced" tag is completely justified. What I'm asking is what justifies the "notability" tag. Here's another way to look at it - if the discography were just a section of the artist's article you wouldn't have placed a notability tag on it, right? If the artist is notable, then so is their discography, whether it's a section or, for no other reason than its length, a separate article. Lennart97 (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
    Reply - @Lennart97:, people can add whatever they want to an article. This is exactly the reason why reliable references are mandatory. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
    Again, that's a sourcing issue, not a notability issue... Lennart97 (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I've asked for clarification at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discographies#Notability of discography articles, maybe that will clear things up. Lennart97 (talk) 12:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alicia DJ Khaled

A tag has been placed on Alicia DJ Khaled requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bennv3771 (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

@Jax 0677: Yeah I know. But because you moved it back to the correct page name, Twinkle detected you as the redirect creator and automatically sent you the above message when I tagged the redirect for speedy deletion. Bennv3771 (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your thread at WP:ANRFC

I removed the thread asking for a re-listing of a WP:RM thread. Please don't list every discussion you're involved with at WP:ANRFC. In this case, Requested Moves are already listed at WP:RM, and you don't even want the discussion closed at this time. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - @力:, I have not posted every discussion in which I have been involved at WP:CRQ, but I will try to use discretion in the future. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Thanks. Regular moves get picked up in 2-3 days most of the time; something super-controversial like the Chauvin one (or very delayed) would make sense to list. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Also, templates like {{ping}} and {{yo}} only work if you add your signature in the same edit. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

"Christmas in June" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Christmas in June. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 12#Christmas in June until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mattx8y (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Weinberg

Hello, Jax 0677. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Weinberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tag Team (group)

Template:Tag Team (group) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

"Melissa Cross" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Melissa Cross. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#Melissa Cross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:43, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of May 2016 North American storm complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article May 2016 North American storm complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2016 North American storm complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Daask (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Moist

Thank you for linking to the appropriate policy. Seems weird to encourage listing unlinked band members but not unlinked albums, but alas that's the policy.— Crumpled Fire • contribs • 01:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Crumpled Fire:, please link to the article in question when you post on a talk page. Also, next time, "If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Jax 0677}}), so that I will be notified." --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

"Arboretum Oaks Apartments" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Arboretum Oaks Apartments. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 2#Arboretum Oaks Apartments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

"Stranger Heads Prevai" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stranger Heads Prevai. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Stranger Heads Prevai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Rummskartoffel (talk • contribs) 12:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stranger Heads Prevai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stranger Heads Prevai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Stranger Heads Prevai. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Rummskartoffel (talk • contribs) 18:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I made my first sandbox.

I saw you're message, and I decided that I'd take you're advice. I made my first sandbox, since I thought of checking out the main editor before anything. I decided to make it about the name "Joe". Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pain_is_fantastic/sandbox tell me what I can do to fix it. I am new to Wikipedia, and I know I probably did MANY incorrect things. So, if you can, please tell me what I can do to improve, so that one day become a good editor. (I know I'm probably doing something wrong , even writing this. Please forgive me, I'm new ;)) Pain is fantastic (talk) 02:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

How template parameters work

FYI, this edit is entirely pointless. The default for a navbox is autocollapse, so there is no reason to specify autocollapse. There is a big difference between | state = {{{state|autocollapse}}} and | state = autocollapse. The first one actually does something, while the second one is entirely pointless. When you add documentation to a template stating that the collapsed state can be changed using the state parameter, you must have | state = {{{state|autocollapse}}} or | state = {{{state|}}} or | state = {{{state|collapsed}}} or ... Really, anything that has the triple braced state in the template. Otherwise, the you are adding false documentation. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Plastikspork:, if you would be so kind, instead of deleting {{cop}}, could you add {{{state}}} like TonyTheTiger has done in the past? Thank you very much for your attention to these matters. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenexa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compensation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677/Archive_24&oldid=1044008027"