User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 26

Chase Rice discography

What needs to be updated on Chase Rice discography? I don't see anything out of date. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, the number of singles and albums was wrong. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

  And you couldn't fix that yourself? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, not easily on a phone. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

  I'm losing patience with you adding vague tags that people don't understand. Final warning to stop doing this. Either take the time to add a note on what you're talking about, change it yourself, or don't do it at all. Vague tags don't help anyone. Sergecross73 msg me 14:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Fire at Zero Gravity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fire at Zero Gravity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire at Zero Gravity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mooonswimmer 16:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1000 Ways to Die

Template:1000 Ways to Die has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mila Mason

Template:Mila Mason has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

requested photograph or picture on 1983–1985 North American drought

For what particular reason are photos and pictures being requested on the drought article for 1983–85? Should these be high quality photos? Angela Kate Maureen Pears 20:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Tropical Storm Angela:, 2020–2022 North American drought shows regions affected, and so should 1983–1985 North American drought. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Need help creating a musician page

Hey hope you’re doing OK I’m trying to create a page and I’ve never done this before. It is a page about a Canadian drummer and founder of joy drop

Tony Rabalao

Do you think you can help me?

Thank you so much Tamar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:1041:B270:AD89:4392:E001:B9DA (talk) 00:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @2607:FEA8:1041:B270:AD89:4392:E001:B9DA and 2607:FEA8:1041:B270:AD89:4392:E001:B9DA:, WP:YFA. --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

"Don't remove tags without fixing the issue"

Jax, there wasn't an issue to begin with. That's why I removed your PROD. You tagged an article for a song that reached the top two on the Billboard Global 200, was a top-five hit in the US and the lead single from the album with the biggest first-week performance this year so far in the US. It already is notable, so there's no issue to "fix". You can cite WP:NSONGS saying "chart positions alone do not make a song notable", but do try to nominate a song like that for deletion and you'll find the editors at AfD don't agree with that guideline. They see "number four in the US" and see notability. Stop drive-by tagging clearly notable articles and use your common sense. Ss112 21:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fire at Zero Gravity.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fire at Zero Gravity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of Chad Oulson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Chad Oulson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Chad Oulson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 20:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

"Ihor Zhovkva" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ihor Zhovkva and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#Ihor Zhovkva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jax 0677

Thank you for creating List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, May 2022.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caroline & Friends

The article Caroline & Friends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to press releases

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

State

Could you explain why you think US belongs in the article? There's no policy stating such.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Pictureperfect2:, when you post on a talk page, please link to the article in question. People from all over the world read Wikipedia, and it is helpful to know in which country the event took place. --Jax 0677 (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jax 0677

Thank you for creating RaDonda Vaught homicide case.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP)

The article This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable independent release. Cracked the charts for a few weeks and quickly disappeared. Zero reviews found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blackbird Sessions

The article Blackbird Sessions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are mostly YouTube listings. The album is just live recordings of cover songs and has no original content. It charted very low and doesn't appear to have been reviewed by any WP:RS. Opposing redirect as other artists have recorded albums with identical or similar titles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jax 0677

Thank you for creating Tulsa Hospital shooting.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

"Template:Rfs" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Rfs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Template:Rfs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

"Template:RFS" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:RFS and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Template:RFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

"Template:+rb" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:+rb and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Template:+rb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

"Template:+l" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:+l and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Template:+l until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 20:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

"Unsecret" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Unsecret and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 13#Unsecret until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 06:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, you might want to read Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, and I contested your prods as these cases do seem to be notable and maybe you should check out the relevant WikiProjects for more specific notability guidelines for judiciary matters or what have you. Wikipedia:WikiProject Law seems a good start. I do think the articles could be fleshed out more. There seems to be good info online. Maybe I'll take a crack at it if I have some free time over Juneteenth weekend. Cheers, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Andrevan@ 21:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Andrevan:, thank you for your message. I am not sure if the PROD template falls well under DTTR. In any event, feel free to improve the articles, if you can. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jax 0677

Thank you for creating AfterLife (album).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:And the Battle Royale

Hello, Jax 0677. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:And the Battle Royale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Subaru Corporation

Hi Jax, long time no chat. I hope all is well with you. I was looking at Subaru Corporation, and realized it didn't have a corporate navbox. Is that something you'd be interested in creating, or would you like me to do it? Thanks. BilCat (talk) 22:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done at Template:Subaru Corporation. There might be some stuff that can be transferred from Template:Subaru, but I'm finished for tonight. BilCat (talk) 02:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case

Hello, Jax 0677

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bruxton, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case

Hello, Jax 0677

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bruxton, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case

A tag has been placed on Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:SUSPECT not a public figure accused - blp conern

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bruxton (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

WP:SUSPECT

I tagged the article for a speedy delete WP:SUSPECT. The suspect is not a public figure and we are not WP:NEWS. Bruxton (talk) 00:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case

Hello, Jax 0677, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Bruxton, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 01:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Faderhead

Template:Faderhead has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:48, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:And the Battle Royale

Hello, Jax 0677. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "And the Battle Royale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Stereo Satellite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereo Satellite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereo Satellite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMSky (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Butler International for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Butler International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butler International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cerebral726 (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 Ohio sexual assault case

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2022 Ohio sexual assault case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gershon Fuentes sexual assault case. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Pregnancy of unnamed 10-year old Ohio girl in 2022 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pregnancy of unnamed 10-year old Ohio girl in 2022 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy of unnamed 10-year old Ohio girl in 2022 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– robertsky (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Dylan Scott

The information about Dylan Scott's third album was not "outdated". The album was only released on the 5th, so any chart positions won't be reflected until the new chart comes out on the chart dated for tomorrow, August 15 (in other words, it missed the cutoff for the chart dated August 8). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Area code 915

If the image is outdated, as is the case in Area code 915, then tag the image and not the article. The image is generated automatically from {{Texas area codes image map}}. Might I suggest bringing this issue up at Template talk:Texas area codes image map? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Minor rape in Ohio

I appreciate that you took steps to remove the suspects name. However, the infobox you added was perverse in the extreme. Listing a rape victim as a "participant" in their own assault violates NPOV, BLP, and plain common sense. Please take this as a final warning that any similar edits will be met with a block. And I suspect you're getting off lightly, in that my less soft-hearted colleagues may have blocked without warning. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm still considering blocking you indef, Jax 0677. You trying to justify that bizarre perversion (diff) is absolutely unacceptable and also incomprehensible, as I noted in my response (diff). You need to tread extremely lightly from this point on. There's nothing we take more seriously on the project than WP:CHILDPROTECT, so it's imperative that you keep this in mind moving forward. El_C 18:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

• Reply -@Vanamonde93:, @El C:, I apologize, and I will watch such edits more closely in the future. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
• I take child protection very seriously, and listing the victim as a participant was an oversight on my part. My goal was to put a useful infobox on the article, and nothing more. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
• This edit will show my second iteration of the navbox, in which I eliminated information about the victim, and only listed the minimum amount of information. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Gama Bomb template edit

I do not understand your reversion of the edit I did to the Gama Bomb template. The template is out of date, in that they have released two albums since then which I added to the template. So, why have you reverted it? LuciferMorgan (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @LuciferMorgan:, WP:WTAF. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

That is not an adequate response, simply due to the fact that the template did not link to the albums in question, so your response is invalid. Right now, the template is incomplete, as it does not fully list the albums the band have released. LuciferMorgan (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Reply - @LuciferMorgan:, WP:EXISTING. -- Jax 0677 (talk) 16:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Irish Goodbye

Disambiguation pages, such as Irish Goodbye, do not need sources are notability. They are not "articles" but rather navigational aids, so they don't need sources to prove that the items exist or might be notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:45, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, then "An Irish goodbye is most often used to describe the action of quickly and quietly leaving a social gathering without saying goodbye to anyone there" should not be on that page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

  That part you're right on. In that case, the link to Wiktionary is sufficient. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tulip Drive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tulip Drive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulip Drive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

––FormalDude (talk) 05:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Coping Mechanism

I just draftified it as it was not suitable for publication whatsoever. I'm not quite sure where to start. Several MOS "violations" (is that the word?), subpar sourcing, and a terribly-written critical reception section (really just quotations, but you get what I mean). I get that NPP reviewers are supposed to wait a few hours before taking measures like these, but giving you time wouldn't really solve the issue at hand. Sorry —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Jax, I saw you reverted my move. Respectfully, I don't think you're picking up what I'm putting down. This article is (seriously) not ready for publication whatsoever. That's the kind way to put it, I think. In the second sentence you use european date-format. See MOS:CAPS, we don't follow musicians' title stylizations in prose. The 'critical reception' section you've typed up isn't even critical reception: the journalists writing these statements are not critics, they're just hyping Willow up, and the quotes are too long. The wording you use is very awkward in some places: "shall feature Yves Tumor", "broadcast 'Maybe It's My Fault'", "was released" (the album is not out yet). You used sources multiple times without combining them into one numbered reference. In several hours you have not even added an infobox, which honestly should have been present in your first edit to this article. You have over a hundred-thousand edits, so you should know better. —VersaceSpace 🌃 01:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @VersaceSpace:, WP:STUB, WP:POORLY, WP:DRAFTOBJECT. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

"Red link to cover"

Jax, I uploaded the cover for Strike a Nerve at the time I edited the page. It worked at the time I saved my edit because I saw it upon saving the article, so I don't know why you claimed it was a "red link" an hour later. Ss112 23:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Ss112:, sorry, the picture did not work for me at the time, perhaps due to "latency". --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Stereo Satellite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereo Satellite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereo Satellite (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Terracon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terracon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terracon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

"Quaker City Night Hawks" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Quaker City Night Hawks and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 9#Quaker City Night Hawks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 01:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Reception sections and press releases issues

I've noticed you do this a few times now, like here for example and it's an issue. You should not be using a bands/record labels own press release in a "critical reception" section. It's a fundamental violation of WP:PRIMARY. Press releases are a first party account. We don't have subjects write their own "reception". Critical reception needs to come from reliable, third party accounts without any conflict of interest or bias in how the subject performs.

Please stop this. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 14:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Sergecross73:, sorry for my error, I will try to keep a more keen eye on that in the future. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Marking replies

If you don't mind, I would like to ask that you not begin all of your replies with the word "Reply" in bold; it doesn't really convey any useful information and is distracting. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 15:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Compassionate727:, though I disagree, I will take your comments under advisement. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Wildly incomplete article creations

You're a long-time, experienced editor. Why are you rushing out these terrible articles? You published this and let it set 3 days before it got sent to AFD, and now you've submitted this poorly constructed article too? I don't recall you making bad calls on article creations in the past, so I don't know what's going on recently, but please slow down and out more care into them. Or let them sit in the draft space longer if you're just short on time or something. Sergecross73 msg me 02:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Sergecross73:, I am editing from a mobile phone, WP:STUB, WP:POORLY, and WP:COLLABORATE. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

That's no excuse. If you can't work up a decent draft, don't publish it. There's nothing compelling you to immediately publish these junk album drafts like this. Sergecross73 msg me 12:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

There's also the fact that your writing was not only poorly written, but directly misleading. You repeatedly wrote prose alluding to "reviews" that were were not album reviews at all. That's either an inexcusable oversight or downright dishonest, as there was no reasonable way to come to the conclusion they were actual reviews. Either way, completely not ready for the public to read. Sergecross73 msg me 12:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Jax 0677: first of all, DRAFTOBJECT is not a policy, and as you've shown there's a good reason for that. Second, if you're editing from a mobile phone, why can't you just not create articles until you've reached a device that works better for you. Also, it would be nice if you could send us actual words and sentences instead of vague links to policies and such —VersaceSpace 🌃 14:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

• Reply - @Sergecross73:, if I alluded to articles that talk about the qualitative aspects of the album songs, and put them under Critical Reception, it is not that big of a deal. I am rarely in front of my home computer anymore, so it is tricky to write certain things on a mobile phone. Besides Wikipedia has many stubs. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  The fact that the article was a stub was not the problem whatsoever. And it is a problem that you are displaying something as "critical reception", when it isn't that at all. —VersaceSpace 🌃 23:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  I concur with the complaints here. If you aren't able to properly format and write an article from a mobile phone, then publish it as a draft first. Then you can finish it up later, or ask someone else to help out. But it's not right to publish inadequate articles in mainspace simply because you can. Don't make it harder on others, or except them to clean up your messes. Please listen. BilCat (talk) 23:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Reply - @BilCat:, I made an honest mistake with the Critical Reception. I wrote The Great Heathen Army and Strike a Nerve without issue. WP:IDEALSTUB states "A stub should contain enough information for other editors to expand upon it" and that "The key is to provide adequate context". Coping Mechanism was recreated after it was redirected unilaterally. With 2022 Indiana abortion, I was told that not everything needs an infobox. WP:YFA says "We welcome good short articles, called "stubs", that can serve as launching pads from which others can take off – stubs can be relatively short, a few sentences, but should provide some useful information". That being said, I shall try to take better care on writing articles in the future. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

"Great Is Our Sin (redirect)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Great Is Our Sin (redirect) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 2#Great Is Our Sin (redirect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Shawn Mullins Navbox

Hey there. Didn't mean to step on your toes with the years in that navbox. I just happened to come across the Beneath a Velvet Sun article and discovered it had been redirected like a decade ago, so I found a couple reviews and recreated it. I just assumed the navbox had been around for a decade or more as well. I've never seen them with years next to the releases before, and figured it was an older format, since I had just spent about ten minutes fixing a very out of date album infobox from that restored article. Had no idea it was only a month old. Cheers. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 14:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Reply - @Torchiest:, please link to the article in question when you post on a talk page. It seems that "Beneath a Velvet Sun" is a red link. There has been no clear consensus as to whether or not years should be next to albums in a music navigation box. It has been informally decided to leave years in a navbox that STARTED with years, but to keep them out of navboxes that did NOT start with years. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

That was supposed to be Beneath the Velvet Sun. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 00:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

"2023 in music" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2023 in music and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 21#2023 in music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Tmtp

Hello, Jax 0677

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rusalkii and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Tmtp, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 12#Tmtp.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rusalkii (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

"Robotronics" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Robotronics and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 14 § Robotronics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 02:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

"TMTP" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect TMTP and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 20 § TMTP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

"Winter storm Goliath" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Winter storm Goliath and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 24 § Winter storm Goliath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 12.206.84.79 (talk) 22:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Woodley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Woodley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Woodley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of explosions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jax 0677!

Happy New Year!

Jax 0677,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of December 2022 North American winter storms

The article December 2022 North American winter storms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Should be a Disambiguation page due to December 12-15, 2022 major blizzard. PROD is occurring due to revert of the DAB page to a redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elijahandskip (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

BLPN discussion closure

Good morning,

I've closed the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#2022_pregnancy_of_a_10-year-old_in_Ohio conversation/s on BLP noticeboard, on I hope it makes sense and strikes the right balance; I would appreciate your feedback. JeffUK 10:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

• Reply - @JeffUK:, should DoNotArchiveUntil still be in the discussion? --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

  I don't know how or why that got added! I assume that means the discussion stays closed but doesn't get automagically moved to the 'archive' page? 2025 seems a bit extreme but I don't see any harm on the discussion remaining more visible for a while longer than normal as lots of people were involved. JeffUK 12:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)