User:Avicennasis/todo

• /cleanup
• /commons
• /creation
• /deletion
• /followup
• /irc
• logs: acc - created - csd - prod - uaa - xfd
• /maintenance
• /misc
• /projects
• /sandboxes
• reports:

• MoveToCommons
• orphtem
• uaa
• unref

• /tools
• /vandalcsd

• sco:User:Avicennasis/todo
• simple:User:Avicennasis/todo
• eo:User:Avicennasis/todo
• commons:User:Avicennasis/todo
• meta:User:Avicennasis/todo

Maintenance ()	Entries
CSD: Copyvio	1
CSD: All	14
Unblock req	172
edittemplate req (table)	9
editextprotected req (table)	28
Semiprotected reqs (table)	27
COI Edits (table)	129
Subst wrong	23
Wrong PP	19
Template Loops	8
PRODs	171
Old PRODs	1
BLP PRODs	1

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S %	Status	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
Pickersgill-Cunliffe	187	0	0	100	Open	00:35, 15 June 2024	19 hours	no	report

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

• Xxurmama69420xX (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Your mom" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Not everything someone has to say about your mom is against policy. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Kokolololopoopopo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "l+o+l+o+l+" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Shitturnip (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• B&C Ratepayer's Association (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Cosstudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• UltimativerHüterDesWissens (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Aliwudbflaiurnfaweufn3or (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: aliwudbphlaiurnphaweuphn3or" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• MBHbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Unauthorised bot. Fram (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  Note: MBHbot is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Doesn't EXEMPTBOT apply for this? Nobody (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation. Userspace editing is allowed per EXEMPTBOT. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  I reported it here because it had edited the mainspace. That page has since been deleted. Fram (talk) 14:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  And they made further mainspace edits between 2014 and 2022. Fram (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  The edits between 2014 and 2022 are a consequence of the account of being a filemover and a bot on commons. Whether this would have continue would depend on the bot owner's approach in following up on renaming files on commons. – robertsky (talk) 01:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. Salvio ^giuliano 19:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  If we are not going to block them I think we need to keep watching them as I expect they will edit without the bot flag. Secretlondon (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  Secretlondon, I agree. I am somewhat on the fence here, but only because the account is so old... As far as I'm concerned, the username violation is clear and WP:EXEMPTBOT does not apply in this case, because that policy does not deal with usernames, whereas WP:BOTNAME does. —  Salvio ^giuliano 11:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Salvio giuliano Since it is actually a bot that has the bot flag on multiple other wikis wouldnt't it be more disruptive to those wikis if we make them change the name? Nobody (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  We cannot and should not make them change their name.Secretlondon (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  The issue is that I think it is editing as a bot on en:, despite not being approved. I think there is a case for blocking it until it gets approval. Secretlondon (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  I've partially blocked them from article space. Either this is a unapproved bot, or it is a username violation. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 20:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Niggzieboy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Why is it offensive? Are you presuming it's a racial slur? Secretlondon (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  It's clearly a COI as they admit to be editing on behalf of the person they are writing about. Secretlondon (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Maskip0079 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. "MAS is an organization..." from userpage. Air on White (talk) 07:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  MAS also seems to be a story, not a real thing. Does kip0079 represent an individual? It's not a username issue IMO. Secretlondon (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Thomaslite (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• I don't see any connection between this username and the entity they were promoting. Am I wrong, Vanderwaalforces? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  @Justlettersandnumbers See Google and especially https://github.com/MathieuGuillout/ThomasLite Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  That's the GitHub page for a slide template? Secretlondon (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  @Secretlondon perhaps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  This is just irritating. Secretlondon (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  @Secretlondon Ah, I’m sorry if it (my reply?) is irritating (to you?). I trust your judgement that it is not a blatant username policy violation. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. Secretlondon (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Oatmoviepage (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Draft:Oru Anveshanathinte Thudakkam (2024 film). Wikishovel (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• I don't see any connection between this username and the subject of the draft. Am I wrong, Wikishovel? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

The film is titled Oru Anveshanathinte Thudakkam, and it's a single-purpose account to create a "movie page" about it. Wikishovel (talk) 11:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes indeed. I should probably have written " ... unacceptable connection". Does this really come under WP:CORPNAME, "Usernames that unambiguously represent the name of a ... product"? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I'd say yes if I reported this though. It is pretty obvious. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

It seems unambiguous to me, but YMMV. I'll defer to your judgment on this, and thanks for asking. Wikishovel (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

COI yes, but the name itself isn't promotional enough as you wouldn't know what oat stood for, unless you knew the name of the movie. Secretlondon (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Not overtly promotional on its own, but I would say it definitely falls under CORPNAME as a role account. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 22:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• St. Baldrick's Foundation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. The account is old but has a clear conflict of interest with St. Baldrick's Foundation. Annh07 (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  I've left them a COI template but it's too old to action as a username. Secretlondon (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. Secretlondon (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Heatherhortonart (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. This user probably means well, their edits haven't been disruptive *but* take a look at the user name and consider that their edits have only been to the article "Heather Horton". Shearonink (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 20:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Polish syco (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Polish psycho?. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Or sicko? Or a company? Nothing much here. Secretlondon (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 21:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• WaluigiNut069 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Sexual username. "Nut" and "69" are not individually enough to block, but in combination they are. Air on White (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• ‎Youflixtv (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnnie Bob (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Lstlkkcwiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 03:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Enchanting

• Enchanting (rapper) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full-protection: There is a high incidence of vandalism by anonymous users and the dissemination of false information, which are exceedingly detrimental. 2RDD (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Not done not seeing a sufficient level of vandalism to need any protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Chima Moneke

• Chima Moneke (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of vandalism by IPs and newly registered single-use accounts. —ShelfSkewed Talk 21:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected this due to all of the unsourced changes. @ShelfSkewed: You might try explaining your reversions in your edit summaries more consistently and in greater detail. It might also help to explain these kinds of reverts further in your user talk page notices. Default edit summaries and default warning templates do not seem to be doing the job. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Dopamine (Normani album)

• Dopamine (Normani album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced and/or copyvio content by anonymous editors on newly-released music. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The level of disruption from unsourced or poorly sourced content isn't quite at the level where page protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Manolis Bikakis

• Manolis Bikakis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Page is riddled by pro-Greek editors who have used only pro-Greek and Greek government sources for the page. Thus i request a protection in case of another wave of these unreliable sources used by the Greeks. Ao192 (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

2024 Ohio State University pro-Palestine campus protests

• 2024 Ohio State University pro-Palestine campus protests (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Claire Redfield

• Claire Redfield (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Kennet School

• Kennet School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rash of vandalism from registered but disposable accounts. DBaK (talk) 00:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Kinu. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Universal Creative

• Universal Creative (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP addresses continually damaging page by removing content without explanation Garsh (talk) 02:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. @Garsh2: If they resume on a different IP in the near future, please submit a new request. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Awareness

• Awareness (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Many IPs from different geographical locations have been re-ordering links without any proper justification. Many cite the philosophy effect, even though that the effect is not a rule of any sort on Wikipedia. Closetside (talk) 03:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele

• Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent removal of AFD and addition of unsourced content by anon socks: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jocer Blandino. Wikishovel (talk) 04:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Jamaal Bowman

• Jamaal Bowman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Do you think we should because it best if we do extend projected (blue lock with e) since now conservative media like New York Post are calling him far left which he is not necessarily what his views are or attacking him harshly just for simple or not that smart mistakes. So, to prevent vandalism and bias, it is best that we protect the article. 174.135.36.220 (talk) 04:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Martin Truex Jr.

• Martin Truex Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Lots of edits and reverts about his expected retirement 45BearsFan (talk) 04:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Kwame Augustine

• Kwame Augustine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article was created by an undisclosed paid editor and was draftified but it was recently moved to the main namespace by a spa after gaining the autoconfirmed status. Since it include paid edits and was created in a violation of WP:PAID this must go through the AfC process. GSS ^💬 04:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Bing Crosby

• Bing Crosby (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range edit-warring to insert preferred text. DonIago (talk) 05:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Module:Location map/data/Israel binyamin/doc

• Module:Location map/data/Israel binyamin/doc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Documentation subpage should be edited by anyone. Vitaium (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: Are you sure you're in the right section? - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: The page is currently template protected, so extended confirmed would indeed be a decrease. Favonian (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

@Frietjes: Notifying protecting admin per bright and yellow, yet so easily overlooked, instruction at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell: protected it, I just moved it (not an admin). Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests

Brianna Wu

• Brianna Wu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

please update the sources for [12] and [13].

12: https://archive.ph/ek0sE

13: https://web.archive.org/web/20161101205623/http://www.briannawu.net/about

Im not afraid (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I posted an edit request on the talk page there to look at this one. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

At present we have "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its Rafah offensive."

I suggest changing it to include a longer, semantically-complete, quotation, to read: "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its military offensive, and any other action in the Rafah governorate, which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part."

As the Guardian article points out, and reports judges as arguing, the last comma is critical to the meaning of the ruling. Hunc (talk) 10:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

References

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Requests for permissions

Current requests

Account creator

(add request • view requests)

---

Autopatrolled

(add request • view requests)

User:VaudevillianScientist

• VaudevillianScientist (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have created over 120 articles (over 40 since 2023) on various STEM-related subjects, several of them received thanks from others and very few have so far had issues. My focus is on STEM-related biographies, concepts, or entities, with sufficient reference links. All my new articles are in the English Wikipedia, but I also do minor edits on factual information in other languages. I'm requesting autopatroller rights in the English Wikipedia to reduce the workload of other editors in reviewing my articles. VaudevillianScientist (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

@VaudevillianScientist: Most of your articles look good at first glance, but I'm a bit concerned about Institute for Molecular Science. Can you expand on your thought process for that article? It doesn't have any secondary sources. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing up that article I started. I meant to expand it further, but it requires to establish more entries on notable Japanese researchers first, which the English Wikipedia is lacking in. I have just added a couple external references and improved the entry. VaudevillianScientist (talk) 12:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Fanminton

• Fanminton (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Very good sourced new articles. Very low error rate. Searches in original literature, finds details I never expected to make available for Wikipedia. Creates important, very unique, very useful encyclopaedic articles. Florentyna (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

---

AutoWikiBrowser

(add request • view requests)

User:WiinterU

• WiinterU (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to have autowikibrowser rights to speed up edits that are too slow when done manually. I work with {{infobox company}} articles and would like to use AWB for speeding up edits that would take way too long to edit manually. ^Wiinter_U 00:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't intend to process this request, but I thought I'd help speed it along by asking you to elaborate a bit on what you intend to use it for @WiinterU. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

@WiinterU: Any thoughts on what you'd be using AWB for? Hey man im josh (talk) 13:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

User:CGP05

• CGP05 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to have autowikibrowser permissions to make editing faster to make Wikipedia better. CGP05 (talk) 00:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

and I also want to try to use javascript wikibrowser CGP05 (talk) 00:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

@CGP05: is there any particular type of edit you'd like to make with AWB/JWB? Elli (talk | contribs) 02:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

I would like to fix spelling mistakes, among other similar miscellaneous edits CGP05 (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:JoelleJay

• JoelleJay (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Patrolling certain deprecated/GUNREL sources. JoelleJay (talk) 03:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 01:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

User:J. Lunau

• J. Lunau (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I became aware of AWB on WikiProject Check Wikipedia while helping on fixing errors via Toolforge. I do have over 400 non-automated edits. I want to use AWB to continue my error fixing work more fast.

---

Confirmed

(add request • view requests)

---

Event coordinator

(add request • view requests)

---

Extended confirmed

(add request • view requests)

User:Onlineone22

• Onlineone22 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Dear Wiki Administrators,

Over the last few days, I drafted, created, and edited (with very minimal help from other users) the entire 2024 Ohio State University pro-Palestine campus protests article. I am in the process of making significant updates to this article because I have lots of information about the events I would like to add and many sources I have not yet added. I also have contacts who are sending me media, including photos and videos they've taken at the event (with copyright permission), to upload to this article.

A Wikipedia Administrator recently made this article Extended Protected. I am very glad that they did this, because I was worried about the potential of vandalism on this article.

However, this Wikipedia account no longer qualifies for editing this article because I created this account recently. As a result, in order to streamline my ability to quickly make changes, I would like to request that this account is whitelisted to edit this article. Please let me know if this will be possible.

Thank you for your help and contributions!

Onlineone22 (talk) 01:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

My take is that we should grant the extended confirmed status. The editor's account is four days old and has 200 edits, but if you look at the contributions to 2024 Ohio State University pro-Palestine campus protests, I do not think we are at any risk that this user is going to push POV improperly on other extended confirmed articles. Given that it is rare to grant these requests, I figured I would voice my support for this and let somebody else endorse or raise issue with it. Malinaccier (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

---

File mover

(add request • view requests)

---

Mass message sender

(add request • view requests)

---

New page reviewer

(add request • view requests)

User:ToadetteEdit

• ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Trial ends June 16, and backlog drive is nearly over. I am reapplying early since some requests may not be answered after two weeks from now. I would like to review more pages and hopefully clear down the backlog. I have reviewed more than 100 articles so far and only very few were unreviewed. Please consider my reviews and AfDs before processing my application. Toadette^Edit! 18:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 18:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 13:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

User:75DD

• 75DD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been active in the NPP BACKLOG and the NEW PAGE FEED and I noticed that the Backlog keep increasing every single day, I really wish to help reduce it even though I can't do it all, and each time I'm here I promise to dedicate my time to the New page feeds and also stick to the policies. Thanks in advance. 75DD (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. You do not meet the minimum edit requirements specified in WP:NPPCRITERIA. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay thanks, I'll request when I meet it. 75DD (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Good day admin, I've surpassed the minimum edit and I'm ready to prove me self, I hope to get my first trial. 75DD (talk) 17:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

You don't meet the minimum account age requirement either. Further, having reviewed your edits to date, I'm seeing some recent article creations with {{notability}} tags and no relevant experience at WP:AfD, so I don't think you're ready for this permission. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay, fine. 75DD (talk) 17:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Raintheone

• Raintheone (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello there. I am a long standing user with a good handle on guidelines and policy. I have taken part in AFDs, more recently improving articles to standards which resulted in them being kept. Elsewhere I have improved new articles that on first glance do not meet GNG but looking BEFORE I have found sources for improvement. So I think I am fair with new content. I also create many new articles, which are now automatically accepted but not everyone has this luxury. I recently became aware of this backlog and I would like to help. Rain the 1 21:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done for two months as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1

• Madeforall1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I’ve been an editor for 2 years and I’ve worked on different articles and have also been able to review some articles, I will love to be granted this right so I can reduce back logs and make things easier for other reviewers, can I be granted one month trial? Madeforall1 (talk) 00:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 00:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. @Madeforall1: Your previous request was declined 7 days ago. You have not improved based on the recommendations that were given at your last request and you've quickly resubmitted a request. I also was not improved with this interaction either. I appreciate your ambition, but there's work to be done and improvements to be made being re-applying. Please try to wait at least 3 months before re-submitting a request. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much Madeforall1 (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:BrigadierG

• BrigadierG (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Was granted a 2 month trial which expires on the 26th of June, hope I'm not jumping the gun by submitting this now (but I'm liable to forget and be surprised later). Submitted 78 reviews during the recent backlog drive and am enjoying the methodical rhythm of AFD + NPP. Would like permanent access. BrigadierG (talk) 00:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 00:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Rydex64

• Rydex64 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm interested in participating in reviewing articles related to music, people, films, and companies pending in the New pages feed backlog. I have been active in NPP and New pages feed, carefully reviewing notability and WP:BEFORE. Has good knowledge of notability guidelines. I would love to request a 3-month trial run. Thanks!

Additionally; Recently identified a suspected case of WP:UPE. After thoroughly analyzing the user's activities, I reported the issue, resulting in their indefinite ban. Here; User Page 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 19:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 20:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

---

Page mover

(add request • view requests)

---

Pending changes reviewer

(add request • view requests)

User:RowanJ LP

• RowanJ LP (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:RITWIK MAHATA

• RITWIK MAHATA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahata^t@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done This user right has a specific purpose and neither this request nor your editng history suggest that you understand what that purpose is and need this user right. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 16:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Imsaneikigai

• Imsaneikigai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 17:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:750h+

• 750h+ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello User:750h+ . Nice seeing you here! From a quick look at your contributions, it seems like you usually don't leave a warning when reverting vandalism nor an semi-automated edit summary. It's very easy to do with tools like WP:Twinkle. Could you start warning editors? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh, nice to see you here to. :) Noted. 750h+ 12:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 17:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Boneless Pizza!

• Boneless Pizza! (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 17:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:GoldRomean

• GoldRomean (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I think I have a decent understanding of Wikipedia's policies. I've monitored recent changes and have mostly reverted vandalism whenever I see it, trying my best to always warn them. I think that being a pending changes reviewer will help me continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. GoldRomean (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 17:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Whisky and more

• Whisky and more (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been registered for some time now and have recently gotten into more regular editing and monitoring of recent changes and pages that come up in publicity or news to check for currency and any wayward or malicious edits or mistakes. I have a good understanding (and am always learning and improving) of the basic and relevant policies for pending changes reviewer permission. I'd love to help make Wikipedia a better place for everyone by supporting pending reviews! Whisky and more (talk) 11:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. It looks like you've undone 9 edits based on your edit history. That's a good start, but I think you should get more experience before re-applying for pending changes reviewer. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:TheNuggeteer

• TheNuggeteer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I participate routinely on both AFD and AFC, I edit routinely, and I have over 1,300 edits. I reverted some edits in my user history. TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:M S Hassan

• M S Hassan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles. I have been an active editor for almost 3 years, with over 16,000 edits. My contributions reflect a solid understanding of Wikipedia's content policies, including verifiability, neutrality, and no original research. I regularly engage in discussions to improve articles. I am committed to ensuring that pending changes are reviewed promptly and accurately. M S Hassan (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Myrealnamm

• Myrealnamm (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hi there! I'm requesting Pending changes reviewer so I can review changes. I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes and the other pages to read (such as WP:VANDALISM and WP:COPYRIGHT), and I have been fighting vandalism for about 2 months now. Having this user right will help me reduce the number of articles listed at Special:PendingChanges. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Garsh2

• Garsh2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Good day! I am requesting reviewer rights to extend my ability to patrol recent changes to include recent change protected articles. I have done extensive, recent work fighting vandalism (RCP) and following related policies in doing so (warning users, improving good faith edits with problems, etc). Through this work (and editing), I have gained an extensive understanding of WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, and more. I do not boast a large quantity of edits (most of my older edits were not logged in), but I am convinced that the quality of my edits meets the criteria for this permission. I have created a handful of pages, during which I have come to understand reliable source requirements, original research guidelines, and what is constructive (and what is not). I believe my discussions with other Wikipedians and detailed comments related to unconstructive good faith edits will demonstrate that I am not here to bite the newcomers. I hope I will be permitted to expand my improvements to the English Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Garsh (talk) 22:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

---

Rollback

(add request • view requests)

User:GoodHue291

• GoodHue291 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello! I'd like to have rollback rights to revert vandalism quickly. I usually use Twinkle to revert vandalism, but with rollback rights, it will be much faster in the blink of an eye. I've been seeing vandalism occur more frequently for some reason when I look at the "recent changes" logs. I want to help fight off vandalism. It's okay if I don't get it, but I want to have an opportunity to help out. GoodHue291 (talk) 23:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 00:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Fastily, they are blocked as a sock anyways. 48JCL TALK 22:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

User:OnlyNano

• OnlyNano (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have met the criteria for requesting access to this tool, and most of my edits to Wikipedia have been reverting and warning. I am very familiar with what constitutes a rollback, and have been using other tools, such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet for a couple months. Looking to get back into Wikipedia, and would love to gain access to this tool. Edit: I should have included that I am interested in switching to AntiVandal, and that is why I am interested in this tool. OnlyNano 19:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 13:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

User:M S Hassan

• M S Hassan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting rollback rights to assist in combating vandalism more efficiently. Over the past several months, I have actively reverted vandalism, I would like to have rollback permissions so that I can revert vandalism faster. I have taken feedback from my previous request seriously and have since ensured to warn users after reverting their edits, including good faith edits. Granting me rollback rights will enable me to help maintain the integrity of Wikipedia more effectively. M S Hassan (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 20:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I apologize for not consistently warning editors when reverting their edits. While I was aware of tools like Twinkle and Ultraviolet, I sometimes forgot to use them. I understand the importance of leaving notifications and will ensure to consistently use these tools moving forward. I am committed to improving my communication and adhering to guidelines. Thank you for your understanding. M S Hassan (talk) 22:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Great, please do that going forward. However, I do see that you were recently blocked for edit warring. Please see the notice at the top of this page; successful applicants are expected to have no recent history of edit warring. That said, please spend a few months establishing a track record of positive contributions before reapplying. As such, closing as  Not done. -Fastily 08:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback and for considering my request. I understand the importance of having a clean record and will focus on making positive contributions to the community. I appreciate the guidance and will work diligently to avoiding edit warring and ensuring I warn editors after reverting their edits. I will reapply in a few months with a stronger track record. Thank you for your time and consideration. M S Hassan (talk) 10:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Totalirus

• Totalirus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hi. I have been reverting vandalism using UltraViolet for a while (quite a bit last year and getting back into it now), and I meet the criteria for rollback permissions. I would like to have rollback permissions to use Huggle or AntiVandal to revert vandalism faster. Totalirus (talk) 23:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 08:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I will be sure to take into consideration the tips you have given me. However, would you mind providing a couple examples of when I forgot to warn people? I don't remember forgetting to do so, but I'll be sure to pay more attention to warning in the future. Totalirus (talk) 22:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Sure: 1, 2, 3 -Fastily 00:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

User:JFHJr

• JFHJr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm active mostly on WP:BLPN and sometimes have to revert problem editors' deeper edits or find the pre-problem version of a BLP manually. I use Twinkle, which has the rollback feature built-in. I've edited responsibly enough over almost 19 years to have never had a sanction or block. Thank you for your consideration. JFHJr (㊟) 01:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Addendum: my track record of warning editors appears in BLPN archives, though I rarely template user pages especially when there's an active BLPN discussion that would make doing so unhelpful, antagonistic, and redundant. Thanks again! JFHJr (㊟) 01:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 08:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

---

Template editor

(add request • view requests)

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

Bot-reported

• Huy1984 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• 110.138.91.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1086 three times in the last 5 minutes (Disruptive edit summaries, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Omarstilus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Jlam2012 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Odinthagod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On David Eccles (businessman): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. A previous warning to the user indicated that further attempts at adding copyvios content would be treated as such. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 04:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Retonom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Talk:Robert Sungenis: WP:NPA, WP:NOTHERE, trolling. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Muhammad Daniyal Bin Saeed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Junk