User:Avicennasis/todo
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
User-reported
[edit]- RealityRipple (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Diff/1240172376. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like an editor who has been editing constructively, separating personal matter/possible COI stuff until this edit, albeit with a low edit count. I could see that happening to myself if I had content outside of Wikipedia to promote, or to anyone in a similar situation. 🙈 Have dropped a promo warning template on them, with a link to the COI policy page as well and let's see how it goes from there. – robertsky (talk) 10:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Except this editor does have a username violation; the editor makes it clear that the account represents realityripple.com. This is pretty blatant. I'd block it now except the account is 18 years old. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- This. and yes. 18 years. – robertsky (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Except this editor does have a username violation; the editor makes it clear that the account represents realityripple.com. This is pretty blatant. I'd block it now except the account is 18 years old. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like an editor who has been editing constructively, separating personal matter/possible COI stuff until this edit, albeit with a low edit count. I could see that happening to myself if I had content outside of Wikipedia to promote, or to anyone in a similar situation. 🙈 Have dropped a promo warning template on them, with a link to the COI policy page as well and let's see how it goes from there. – robertsky (talk) 10:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Mr Sadick (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Jdcomix (talk) 14:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Suck on me grubs (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Huntthetroll (talk) 00:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Archeologyispseudoscience (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Offensive to the whole academic field of study. they are clearly here to disrupt..... Moxy🍁 02:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- SheboonWatch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Racist portmanteau of "she" and "baboon". Huntthetroll (talk) 02:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hohol slayers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Russian-language slur for Ukrainians. Huntthetroll (talk) 02:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Gasthemonkeys (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Huntthetroll (talk) 03:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Requesting indefinite as random IPs keep blanking part or almost all of the article. This disruption happens every couple of weeks or so.
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Requesting indefinite as random IPs keep blanking part or almost all of the article. This disruption happens every couple of weeks or so.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Atleast 2 days of temporary semi protection as IPs are found to be adding unsourced reviews or opinions, reason maybe film is being premiered one day before release date which is today. Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. See also WP:ATPROT: article talk pages are rarely protected, and when they are, it's usually on a short-term basis. Mz7 (talk) 01:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Film was recently released. IPs are found to be adding unsourced content. 3 revert rule violation by a user who was later blocked. 2 days semi protection atleast requested. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobanfasil. Wikishovel (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is hot on social media and this is only the beginning of the deluge. Ogress 19:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Unauthorized deletion of the source and incorrect quotation of sources "the person simply came up with the text and inserted it instead of the correct quotation» Dushnilkin (talk) 19:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. Jdcomix (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Multiple new users and IP editors (possibly paid or COI) adding/reinstating promotional-esque material and external links into the article. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting indefinite as this the same kind of low-level vandalism/disruption happens every month or so, has been for years. GraziePrego (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Still too much blanking, addition of uncited content, and warring going on from WP:SPAs here. Amigao (talk) 03:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A series of NPOV edits, blanking, and warring by WP:SPAs. Amigao (talk) 04:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to the Russia-Ukraine war. It may need to be protected per WP:RUSUKR. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 05:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – per WP:RUSUKR. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 05:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please remove the partner Jason Momoa of Adria Arjona pages as he would be the partner because he is not the partner and it is false misleading information and fake media, as Jason Momoa is with Nicolle A. Morea already in a Marriage commitment and they are since a year and more trying to add but people are doing wrong things and on top they started trying it with Adria and Jason said no to Adria and is not with Adria and will not be with her and is in a marriage commitment with Nicolle and proofed her again that no other woman is his wife already than Nicolle and it's impossible for Adria to be the girlfriend out of the blue because Jason Aint cheating on Nicolle and all and everything is fake media and he told Nicolle and the others all know and you all add unRIABLE sources and the people it is about try to go and fix it and you all play around with them. E and your not Jason or Nicolle or Adria and if Adria would play anything here or say she is lying then herself and she is not with him and never will because he Jason Momoa is not getting another divorce after just having one and getting in another marriage commitment and that with Nicolle and they are not breaking up or getting a divorce because of an Adria with false misleading information of fake media of someone who came and added it up and others followed the fake for their making. 178.24.242.228 (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- It’s strange that I can’t find any decent sources to confirm a relationship with Nicolle. I think this will have to be declined. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Current requests
[edit]Account creator
[edit]Autopatrolled
[edit]- Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jordanroderick (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Noorullah21 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wheatley2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have autopatrolled, as I believe it would help me in the process of making new pages. Sincerely, Wheatley2 (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has created roughly 5 articles. — MusikBot talk 06:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Update: I am withdrawing. I thought article just meant pages and not pages with encyclopedic content. Sorry! Wheatley2 (talk) 23:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- GreatStellatedDodecahedron (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser
[edit]
- NyanThousand (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sir MemeGod (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I will use AWB to tag galaxy-related (and other astronomical objects) with the appropriate talk page banners (WP:ASTRONOMICAL OBJECTS), and will use it to tag "Weather of _____" (and other weather articles) with the corresponding task force talk page banner tags. I can also use it for typos on long tornado articles, which tend to have misspellings in them. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Isaac Rabinovitch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hoping it will make nitpicky edit somewhat less tedious. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Manicjedi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I lost this permission somewhat recently due to inactivity, but intend to resume using some of this tools in reviewing changes. Thank you. —Manicjedi (talk) (contribs) 12:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([2]). — MusikBot talk 13:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Done I'm not sure I would have granted you AWB when you were originally granted it back in 2011, but since there seems to have been no problems since let's roll. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Global Donald (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm requesting AWB access because I create and aim to create a lot of pages, and manually adding links to the pages I created can take a lot of time. I already used it on Wikia a few years ago. My use of the tool might include other small fixes as well in the future if I see other struggles with the pages I created. --Global Donald (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Global Donald (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done Fails minimum criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Anthony2106 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: I'm sick of making "find replace" edits, like this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this Anthony2106 (talk) 08:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Some of those edits left capital letters in the middle of sentences where there should be lower-case letters and changed WP:ENGVAR spellings. This edit did not change the rendered page, so it would be an invalid edit to make with AWB. Making such changes at scale is probably not a good idea. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Cosmia Nebula (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
For creating links to pages, such as "encoder-only Transformer" to Transformer_(deep_learning_architecture)#encoder-only pony in a strange land (talk) 22:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- యర్రా రామారావు (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Not functningయర్రా రామారావు (talk) 14:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser#AWB_Permission_error. Primefac (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done for bot. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Bunnypranav (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: Assists in helping for typo correction. The proof of which can be seen from my contributions in Typo Team Moss-D Bunnypranav (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done You now technically meet the header criteria, but you still don't really have enough experience IMO. I will be willing to grant once you've made a few hundred more edits, especially more substantive edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nmael (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Interested in streamlining fixing of typos & CheckWiki errors as I have been doing with WPCleaner; also interested in using more advanced features of AWB to help with updating genome infoboxes for multiple articles related to biology. nmaeltalk 13:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- QwertyForest (public) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Alternate account of autoconfirmed user (User:QwertyForest). QwertyForest (public) (talk) 09:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can confirm that this account belongs to me. QwertyForest (talk) 09:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Event coordinator
[edit]Extended confirmed
[edit]- Artem P75 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights
Hello, am requesting extended confirmed rights so I may be able to translate wikipedia pages from Bulgarian to English. I have noticed there are many bulgarian wikipedia pages missing, I have created a few, however for certain ones there is very little information in English, for example a search for the Gyumyurdzhinski Snezhnik massif nets very, very few results with almost no information in English, however searching for it in Bulgarian brings a number of results, including an existing wikipedia page:
I would like to translate this page, and other ones that I come across
Edit: I have published a rough draft translation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gyumyurdzhinski_Snezhnik_massif Artem P75 (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm looking at your contributions globally, and you do not appear to have any contributions to the Bulgarian Wikipedia. Can you expand a bit upon your level of comprehension of the Bulgarian language? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, no I do not have any contributions to the Bulgarian Wikipedia and I have only recently joined the wikipedia community. I have a particular interest in Balkan History and Bulgarian villages / landmarks. My comprehension of Bulgarian is limited, I cannot type or speak Bulgarian, but I can understand the majority of it when translating to english, I do however sometimes rely on translation tools in circumstances where I cannot understand. I am however familiar with Cyrillic script. If I do not satisfy the criteria to translate and publish I am happy to just translate and save as a draft for more experienced community members. Artem P75 (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done You will become extended confirmed automatically in another two weeks. I'm not seeing a convincing reason to expedite that process here. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
File mover
[edit]Mass message sender
[edit]
New page reviewer
[edit]- HRShami (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done, while your extensive article contributions are appreciated, I'm not seeing any experience around deletion. Additionally, from an operational security perspective, I am further disinclined to confer NPP permissions to editors who have recently received autopatrol. signed, Rosguill talk 19:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Xegma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? — 48JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. – Joe (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason (WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Could anyone please review my request ? It is already couple of days. Xegma(talk) 18:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'd like to say that I've been working so hard for the past couple of months. I've made so many contributions to AFCs, I've reviewed over 1,160 articles (accepts: 138, declines: 670, and the rest either rejected or speedily deleted) so far. I'm also actively patrolling the new page feed, adding maintenance tags, and tagging articles for speedy deletion like A3, A7, and G11. I've drafted more than 200 articles that either lacked reliable sources or needed additional sources. In the AFD discussions, I voted on more than 150 pages. Without considering the no consensus results, 98.6% of my AfD's were matches, and even though the votes were assumed to be piles on voting, most of my recent votes were very detailed and specific and weren't pointing towards anyone, but I will accept their valuable advice and try my best to make improvements at AFDs as well. Having said that, I believe that all those contributions exhibit my hard work and dedication. I hope I get a chance to at least prove myself by patrolling new pages, and I would be more than happy to help with the backlog. Thanks for your time and consideration. Waqar💬 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Florificapis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and applying CSD whenever necessary. Florificapis (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Rusty Cat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'd like to help out with the backlog at NPP. My previous experience includes many nominations of drafts under G1, G2, and G3, and a couple instances of article ratings and XfD participation. Rusty 🐈 03:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Pygos (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to become a new page patrol to accelerate the page creation process, improve the quality of Wikipedia pages, and reduce the huge current backlog. I have a good understanding of what a qualified article would look like, and created around four articles like Organothallium Chemistry. I have also done various other editing, including merging Carbohydrate Chemistry into Carbohydrate. Pygos (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Aszx5000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was given a temporary NPP right that expired at the start of August here. I am willing to keep patrolling if my NPP work has been considered useful. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Aszx5000 (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ca (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
My previous request for NPP was successful, but I let go of the right due to a lack of motivation. I would like to tackle the redirect backlog; I have reviewed close to 1000 articles in AfC, and commented often on RfDs. Ca talk to me! 06:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Tajotep (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Two months ago I was given the new page reviewer right, and I want to continue with it. I trust I have made good contributions. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) This user's NPP rights expired on the 5th of August. Rusty 🐈 22:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Camillz (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe I would be able to help reduce the catalogue of pages needing review. I would review them properly with an unbiased view point. Camillz (talk) 13:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 404 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 13:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- CherryPie94 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 85 pages including a GA. I am familiar with the p&g on notability and reliable sources. Would like to put my knowledge to use by reviewing pages and help out WikiProject Korea a bit more. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Arijit Kisku (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights:
Having a passion for sharing information in a structured way and ensuring the quality of also compling with wikipedia guidelines. I want to join as new page patroller and help to maintain and edit on new articles. Arijit Kisku (talk) 07:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 437 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 07:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done Does not meet the minimum requirements. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- KingSkyLord (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 06:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi again, Toadette. You were great during the 2024 CrowdStrike-related article title saga! I hope you become a Page Mover at the same time as me! Jruderman (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Given User talk:ToadetteEdit#Move review for Donald Trump fist pump photographs just today, as well as a past history of similar closes of deletion discussions at DRV, I am not convinced this should be granted. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm also concerned about User_talk:ToadetteEdit#RM_at_Talk:Ted_Wilson_(figure_skater), which is, at best, a communication failure (
A good closer will transparently explain how the decision was reached
– WP:NHC), and at worst a headcount to determine consensus (WP:NOTDEMOCRACY). DatGuyTalkContribs 13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jruderman (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am aware that my edit count is low for this permission. I feel that I have enough experience with article title discussions, redirect discussions, and deletion discussions to know what is likely to be controversial. I have the temperament to not abuse power.
I plan to step up my involvement in improving Wikipedia in general, possibly via crowdfunding. I am prepared to take a shot at formally concluding move discussions, and just as importantly, prepared to recuse myself if necessary. I understand that closing requires many of the same skills I discovered in myself during the 2024 CrowdStrike article naming saga.
I would like to hit fewer technical snags when moving pages. But I do not want full admin powers. So, asking for page mover permission seems like the correct step at this time. Jruderman (talk) 06:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 2573 total edits. — MusikBot talk 06:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- From my talk page, reposted without comment:
* Pppery * it has begun... 14:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Anyway: I noticed Jruderman requested page mover ability. I'd strongly encourage whoever reviews his request to assess his recent history, particularly in the 2024 CrowdStrike incident page, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination), and also to see his talk page. He is very clearly unfamiliar with the processes of Wikipedia. After no consensus was achieved for the CrowdStrike move, he wanted to unilaterally move the page and multiple people had to explain why that isn't appropriate. I think he is wholly unfamiliar with how consensus is achieved, when pages should he moved, and, to be honest, how Wikipedia "works" in general. I hope his request is investigated thoroughly, particularly the pages I mentioned/linked and the talk page advice others have tried to give him. He needs assistance or ADOPTion, but I'm worried giving him page moving ability is far too early. Thanks. 91.223.100.49 (talk) 12:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- On a related note, following the closure of a previous move request by this editor there was a suggestion that a page be unilaterally moved over objections instead. I would close this as "not done" due to not meeting the minimum requirements and not having much experience with moves, but I have also reverted or altered a few of this editor's moves recently. To Jruderman, I would suggest not seeing this permission as a "power" whether open to abuse or not. It should not be difficult to receive this permission without the need for self-promotion if and when evidence of experience and effectiveness is clear. Dekimasuよ! 15:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm an active AfC reviewer, and I spend a lot of time patrolling new pages. I often draftify articles that are not sourced or need additional sources (over 250 articles so far). Having this right would be super useful and help reduce the number of R2 tags for admins in the backlog. I also have experience in WP:RM, and I'd like to request page mover rights for non-controversial tasks. Thank you, Waqar💬 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- AlexBobCharles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Adriazeri (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- MSouvik01 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- TheNuggeteer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 09:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- TheFrenchKing (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been creating and monitoring articles in Wikipedia for a long time and its time to a new step in this great community. TheFrenchKing (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- GrabUp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hey, I was granted 3 month rollback rights trial by Robertsky, and it is set to expire next week. Can someone renew it so that I can continue the counter-vandalism work with Antivandal. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 07:16, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Robertsky (expires 19:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done given that you are currently blocked from PERM pages for disruptive editing/hat-collecting. Please spend a few months establishing a pattern of positive contributions after the block expires before requesting advanced permissions. -Fastily 07:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- TheFrenchKing (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
To counter vandalism and IP vandalism. TheFrenchKing (talk) 20:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 07:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Partey Lover (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I just reached 500 wikipedia edits, and almost all of them have been patrolling recent changes. I'm due to become an extended confirmed user tomorrow so I figured now would be a decent time to fill out a request for rollback rights. I would like rollback rights to use more wikipedia extensions like AntiVandal. Partey Lover (talk) 05:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism a few days ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 07:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Piscili (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been active patrolling recent changes and combating vandalism with Twinkle. I meticulously leave a note of caution on the talk page of users I revert their edits. Having advanced tool will facilitate the work. Piscili (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Done Malinaccier (talk) 16:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jiffles1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling recent changes and combating vandalism for a little over a month. I've been primarily using Twinkle and I would like to request rollback privileges to use other tools such as Huggle. I understand the importance of leaving users a notice whenever their edits are reverted. Jiffles1 (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]
Reports
[edit]- Lifenude august (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Mz7 (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:56a:f4e2:2400:5418:cb27:98d6:8794 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 172 five times in the last 5 minutes (Section blanking, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 138.88.143.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Edit warring to add promo text and embedded external links. MrOllie (talk) 22:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- MyUsernameWillBeSomthingCool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Joe Cohen (diff): After 4th warning, continues to blank content from BLPs. (Appears to be trying to make leads 2 sentences or less.) Mobile editor who has never used their talk page. Hopefully a brief block will get them to view their many warnings. Schazjmd (talk) 22:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- EAPie47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Buddhism: vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Remsense 诉 23:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- M_S_Hassan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) The extended-confirmed user is abusing his access for disruptive editing of Baalveer and is engaged in persistent reverting. The user is dominating other contributors. 7:23, 15 August 2024 (IST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 000099999AB (talk • contribs) 01:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Junk |
---|