User:OlEnglish/Dashboard

Wikipedia Status Dashboard

Vandalism information
Level 4
Low to moderate level of vandalism
3.93 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 21:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Birthday Rdp060707

Adminship Anniversary AGK

First Edit Day Kpgjhpjm

Recent changes patrol (Real-time)

Before reading any further, please verify that the following edits are not vandalism:

List of abbreviations (help):

D

Edit made at Wikidata

r

Edit flagged by ORES

N

New page

m

Minor edit

b

Bot edit

(±123)

Page byte size change

6 May 2024

• diffhist Egalitarianism‎ 22:07 +572‎ ‎Luca Vieten talk contribs‎ (I added one key aspect regarding egalitarianism) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Yetunde Abosede Zaid‎ 22:07 +489‎ ‎Emmanuella643 talk contribs‎ (Added content and citation) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist User:Arawoke/sandbox‎ 22:07 +1,316‎ ‎Arawoke talk contribs‎ (→‎Carlos Scharff)
• diffhist Gaël Monfils‎ 22:07 −3‎ ‎62.4.44.140 talk‎
• diffhist m Waleed Al-Bekheet‎ 22:07 +12‎ ‎Simeon talk contribs‎ (Changing short description from "Kuwaiti hammer thrower" to "Kuwaiti hammer thrower (born 1965)") Tag: Shortdesc helper
• diffhist Pityriasis rotunda‎ 22:07 −2‎ ‎CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath talk contribs‎
• diffhist Bathurst War‎ 22:07 +36‎ ‎A.j.roberts talk contribs‎ (→‎Governor Thomas Brisbane: cn: for a few un-cited assertions) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist Luigi's Mansion‎ 22:07 −26‎ ‎162.236.20.218 talk‎ Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Steven Weitzman‎ 22:07 −2,098‎ ‎Viewmont Viking talk contribs‎ (→‎Press coverage: Not a webhost)
• diffhist Zardoz‎ 22:07 +12‎ ‎Csboger talk contribs‎ Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

Also check: New pages patrol and New images patrol and Pending Changes patrol

Admin dashboard

CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.

Immediate requests Entries Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0 Wikipedians looking for help 0 Requests for unblock 113 Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 56 Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 7 Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5 Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 130 Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0 Candidates for speedy deletion 6 Open sockpuppet investigations 218 Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

Administrative backlog

AfD debates relisted 3 or more times

Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions

Requested RD1 redactions

Requests for unblock

SPI cases awaiting administration

Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems

Template:Admin dashboard

Template:Admin dashboard/light

Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox

Template:Admin dashboard/testcases

Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

Wikipedia:Closure requests

Wikipedia:Copyright problems

Template:Did you know/Queue

Template:DYK queue/backlog

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no drafts

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no portals

Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Wikipedia:Requested moves

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist

Wikipedia:Template index/Wikipedia namespace

Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion	Entries
User requested	1
Empty articles	0
Nonsense pages	0
Spam pages	1
Importance or significance not asserted	1
Other candidates	5

---

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Category:Expired proposed deletions

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 218 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

• Tep Studios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

• Bush3d Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

Requests for page protection

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Kim Woo-jin

• Kim Woo-jin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and newly registered persistent removal of WP:NOTCENSORED content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days

• List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High risk being issued for OK today, please protect page for at least 48 hours. BryceM2001 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yusufzai

• Yusufzai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP users have came into the page for months on end adding random content. My previous request (here) for a long duration ban was ignored because... ? So these are IPs that have been tampering around for months, perhaps approaching half a year of this now. I request a months long duration ban on IP users, the sole source of the article being messed around. High protection isn't needed but atleast some level of protection is, for a long duration of time as this just happens to be one of those articles that need it. This article literally degrades over time when left alone thanks to these IP users. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yeh Hai Chahatein

• Yeh Hai Chahatein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks from Entertainment4Reality after named accounts blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Liver King

• Liver King (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Frequent BLP vio and unconstructive editing Orchastrattor (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Roti canai

• Roti canai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive content removal by unregistered user(s). Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

List of Sony Pictures Animation productions

• List of Sony Pictures Animation productions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Addition of unsourced content, high level of IP vandalism, and disruptive editing. 216.208.153.194 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Hook (2022 TV series)

• Draft:Hook (2022 TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

These pages seriously need locking down because the IP keeps asking for re-reviews without addressing the issues raised on the relevant talk page which is akin to Wikipedia:DISRUPTIVE. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 18:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I have not looked close enough to determine if a request to protect this draft is valid. However, I will say this IP is part of a larger UPE sock farm and we will be dealing with their bludgeoning of this draft (and others) unless a protection is made. And while it is unlikely to stop them, hopefully it will slow them for a while.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series)

• Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Om Parvat

• Om Parvat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Rangiya railway division

• Rangiya railway division (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Worcester, England

• Worcester, England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:8512:5300::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

KCBS-TV

• KCBS-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suggested by User:Mer764Wiki. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for mentioning me. Byt no seriously, Broadcasting stations are not a joke. mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 18:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Update: LITERALLY an minute after Mvcg66b3r's revert was reverted, that revert by the vandal was reverted by someone else. (Mvcg66b3r is not an vandal). mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 19:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Julen Lopetegui

• Julen Lopetegui (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IPs to BLP following press speculation. Egghead06 (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

A-1 Auto Transport

• A-1 Auto Transport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Deleted twice pursuant to discussion them recreated in mainspace by SPA (now up for speedy deletion). Requesting creation protection to hopefully curb the likely UPE concern. CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Kuru may have intended to do something similar; the current semi-protection has no effect as non-autoconfirmed editors can't create articles anyway. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
  • ToBeFree Ugh, not my best moment. Thanks for correcting that. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

    All good. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Neuro-linguistic programming

• Neuro-linguistic programming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Full protection - an editor refuses to observe WP:REFVAR, repeatedly changing the reference style, badly, leaving multiple citation errors each time. They have been warned repeatedly on their talk page for disruptive editing, but continue to WP:CANTHEARYOU. Skyerise (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

While I had some citation errors, I also fixed the majority of issues. That current referencing makes it hard to read the source let alone verify the sources cited. In the process of adding page numbers and checking sources I found numerous content issues as well. I explained on multiple occasions that I was in the middle of correcting the citation errors when I was reverted by Skyerise. I needed to save those edits otherwise would have lost hours of work. —Notgain (talk) 22:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Erik ten Hag

• Erik ten Hag (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Wars of the Roses

• Wars of the Roses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalsim. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Rebekah Jones

• Rebekah Jones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Majority of recent edits are anon IP, and more often than not reverted due to policy violations. It's getting hard to find a reliable past version to revert to... cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

2024 University of California, Los Angeles pro-Palestinian campus occupation

• 2024 University of California, Los Angeles pro-Palestinian campus occupation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Please reduce it to semi protection. I am a UCLA prof, my students have learned to edit Wikipedia and are keen to contribute. I created the article. But they are new so extended confirmation has blocked their edit access. Noopur28 (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests

ChatGPT

• ChatGPT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

New URL Change from chat.openai.com to chatgpt.com 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

(Not an Admin but...) The main url is chat.openai.com, chatgpt.com redirects you to there. No reason to change it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

probably an A/B test 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A grammar fix is required for a sentence in the second paragraph of the article:

"During this attack, 1,139 Israelis and foreign nationals including 766 civilians and 373 security personnel were killed, while 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken captive to the Gaza Strip with the stated goal to force Israel to release Palestinian prisoners"

Change "goal to force Israel to" to "goal of forcing Israel to" Aadamwaheed (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Israel-Hamas war

• Talk:Israel-Hamas war (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to request the addition of a talk page on the Israel-Hamas war article that points out that the map on said article doesn’t show the Israeli evacuation order from Rafah and should be updated. LordOfWalruses (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

6 protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Module:List (request) 2024-03-25 20:55 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection" Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (request) 2024-04-25 14:25 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection" MediaWiki:Wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked (request) 2024-05-01 12:11 MediaWiki page (log) MediaWiki:Wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked-range (request) 2024-05-01 12:11 MediaWiki page (log) Asdfmovie (request) 2024-05-06 20:01 Fully protected (log) Protected by AmandaNP on 2017-10-14: "Repeatedly recreated" User:Halibutt/Archive 15 (request) 2024-05-06 21:17 Fully protected (log) Protected by Malcolmxl5 on 2018-02-12: "Deceased Wikipedian."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

7 template-protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Template:Infobox station (request) 2024-04-30 18:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors" Template:S-reg (request) 2024-05-01 19:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify" Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-05-06 00:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions" Template:Canadian party colour/name (request) 2024-05-06 07:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions" Template:TBA (request) 2024-05-06 14:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by El C on 2024-04-28: "High-risk template or module" Module:Multiple image (request) 2024-05-06 15:29 Template-protected (log) Protected by Jackmcbarn on 2014-11-18: "High-risk Lua module" Module:Adjacent stations (request) 2024-05-06 20:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by CambridgeBayWeather on 2019-02-03: "Highly visible template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report No RfXs since 12:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:RFP

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

(add request • view requests)

User:B3251

• B3251 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I am making a request on behalf of myself, as I sometimes create new articles pretty often (mostly New Brunswick-related). As of right now I have 66 live articles, and I have expanded plenty more. I have had a few deletions: two articles when I was brand new to editing & one list I created in mid-2023 (due to not completely understanding WP:BLPCRIME at the time). Otherwise, my articles have been pretty straightforward and vary in quality, with most being Start/C-class by the time I publish them. I had a little bit of a rough start when it came to "notability knowledge", as many do, but overtime I have grown to have an understanding of WP:GNG and WP:MOS when writing articles. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done I've looked through your last 10 articles. You produce clean articles and nobody comes along and does tidy-up work. The obvious area for improvement is with date formats. Often, you use mdy dates in the prose and you consistently use dmy dates for referencing. Not sure why you do that but it's not a good idea. Settle on one date format and then stick to it. And with regards to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Loblaw boycott, I'm unconcerned about that; the worst that will happen is a merge. Good work! Schwede66 08:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

I agree that I need to get into the habit of adding the "Use mdy dates" templates. The reason why I use dmy in referencing is due to just being used to Wikipedia's automatic dmy-setting retrieve date for referencing. B3251 (talk) 15:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TheGreatestLuvofAll

• TheGreatestLuvofAll (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have created at least 25 articles that follow WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG about singers and albums. I am familiar with WP:C, WP:V, and WP:BURDEN in my articles, without copying content without permission, and I make sure my info is sourced in any articles I created. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done There's always a little bit that others have to clean up when you finish with an article. Nothing major: DEFAULTSORT, dashes, categorisation. But to walk away from such a version is just not good enough. It wasn't just tagged for bare URLs but also as an orphan. And when someone came and fixed your bare URLs for you, you removed the bare URLs tag but didn't attend to the referencing mistake that the other editor had introduced. For autopatrolled, articles need to be cleaner. Your editing seems a bit rushed. With a little more care, you could qualify for autopatrolled in no time. As an aside, removing unpleasant messages from your talk archive is not something you should do. Schwede66 09:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Princess of Ara

• Princess of Ara (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Prince of Erebor

• Prince of Erebor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have created 75 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Thatbombayboy

• Thatbombayboy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have made many edits, and I think if I can get permission, I will able to contribute more effectively. Thatbombayboy (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Indefinitely blocked as a sock. Schwede66 08:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:SheriffIsInTown

• SheriffIsInTown (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

(add request • view requests)

Requests for page mover

Page mover

(add request • view requests)

User:Kung Fu Man

• Kung Fu Man (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Requesting page mover rights for my frequent work on video game character articles, many of which involve writing up an article on a userpage to later move to where a previous redirect may exist and working alongside other editors towards this end. Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:WiinterU

• WiinterU (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I would like to have page moving rights because of many company articles with incorrect article names with their correct names being the redirects. ^Wiinter_U 00:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Remsense

• Remsense (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

1. I often move articles in a space (China and Chinese-related topics) where there are specific naming conventions that are uncontroversial moves, sometimes requiring #delete-redirect.
2. I often move pages around in my userspace, and #suppress-redirect would perhaps clutter the U1 log less. Remsense诉 23:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Clearfrienda

• Clearfrienda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I'm requesting page mover rights to draftify articles without having to go through WP:CSD. I have lots of experience at WP:AFC and WP:NPP reviewing and moving pages and meet the minimum requirements. Clearfrienda ^💬 21:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

(add request • view requests)

User:Sunnyboi18

• Sunnyboi18 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.

I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm leaving this open for another, previously uninvolved admin to review, I was just explaining myself. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 18:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Allan Nonymous

• Allan Nonymous (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have a history of cleaning up grammar, removing and refactoring uncited content and fixing citations. I'm hoping to maybe expand my editing scope a bit. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:CanonNi

• CanonNi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi. I recently got Rollback rights, so I thought it would be nice to have PCR rights as well. The main reason I would like this right is to further deal with vandalism, and accepting good edits. Although the pending changes backlog is not as high as... some other backlogs I could mention, I would still like to help with reviews. Thanks for considering my request! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 21:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback

Rollback

(add request • view requests)

User:Lynch44

• Lynch44 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have been reverting vandalism as an account for about a month now, and have familiarized myself with Twinkle as well. Also note the 20,000 edits, mostly anti-vandal, that I made as an IP. Lynch44 (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

If you consider me not fit for rollback due to this, then I am more than willing to wait further if necessary, and I will try to be more efficient in warning others in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I've neither approved nor denied your request. But I would like to have a conversation on why you haven't been notifying editors after reverting their edits. Is it because... you didn't know you needed to, you've been acting too quickly without giving proper attention to each revert, etc? -Fastily 05:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Part of it was me assuming the edit was so minor that an edit summary would be sufficient (like the second diff), or, just not giving a warning or notice because I did not feel there was a specific one that could fit. Again, I will try to warn or notify all editors when reverting them in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, please ensure that you are always leaving notifications. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Understood. Moving forward, I promise to notify all editors when I revert their edits, good faith or not. Lynch44 (talk) 01:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks for confirming,  Done -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Wiiformii

• Wiiformii (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello! For about the past month, I've been patrolling recent changes and have gotten to know Ultraviolet well as I consistently warn users who make unconstructive and bad-faith edits. I am requesting rollback rights to further enhance my patrolling by using tools such as AntiVandal which will speed up the process greatly and Huggle which is a helpful tool to have to combat vandalism. Rollback also makes my reverts faster and more efficient allowing me to respond faster and better. Wiiformii (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily Hello, these edits were mistakes on my part, although the large majority of the rest of my reverts come with warnings using Ultraviolet (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Thank you for bringing it to my attention and I will make sure to appropriately warn users in the future. Wiiformii (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

I understand. I promise I will always leave warnings in good faith or not. Thank you for letting me know. Wiiformii (talk) 21:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Footer

Policies and links

This dashboard (talk)

Noticeboards

Administrative action review (2 threads) Most recent: I’m beyond fed up. Wrongful ban on false grounds by @Firefangledfeathers

Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (3 threads) Most recent: Petextrodon Entropyandvodka Christsos

Relisted AfD debates

Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic
Buffer theory — List of Indian Kingdoms overthrown due to Muslim conquests —

Not yet sorted

Requested moves

April 29, 2024
Ultra (rapid transit) → Ultra pod transit system – (Discuss)

Articles for creation

Template:AFC statistics [Disabled due to template transclusion limits]

Deletion review

6 May 2024

Woke Mind Virus

Woke Mind Virus (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Communicated with the closer user:Ganesha811 prior to posting this comment here for deletion review. The closer respectfully disagrees, but has not posited any specific evidence or points to bolster their reason for interpreting the "consensus" as they did beyond stating, "I appreciated your reasoned arguments in favor of keep, but after re-reading the linked policies and considering the !votes for deletion as well as those explicitly for merge, I felt that a merger which retained large parts of the material reflected the overall consensus."

The page Woke mind virus in fact had dozens of sources that were reliable and clearly and unambiguously separated the word "Woke mind virus" out as distinct from woke. More importantly for this deletion review, I feel that the largest body of consensus, both in terms of !votes as well as most importantly in terms of WP policy arguments, all pretty clearly favored a Keep close of the AfD. This is my first time ever requesting a AfD that closed in a manner that I feel was inconsistent with the apparent consensus to be reviewed. It seemed that most recently too near the time of close even more Keep !votes had been emerging, and therefore the close was both premature and not representative of the actual consensus as I understood the varied arguments and commentary. Iljhgtn (talk) 12:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Relist. Policy gives a closing admin a fair amount of discretion in picking a viable ATD over deletion, even when views for the Merge/Redirect option don't receive a rough consensus. Policy gives a closing admin no leeway in picking Merge as an alternative to Keep, when there's no consensus to do so. Even if we view all Delete !votes in this AfD as implicitly supporting a merger - a big stretch of interpretation - there still is no consensus for Merge as the preferred result. I'm on the fence as to whether the closing rationale expresses a supervote, but even if it doesn't, the reading of consensus was wrong, and the close was premature. Owen× ☎ 13:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
• Weak endorse. Either of a "no consensus between keep or merge" or "keep" closure would have been justified, but that doesn't mean this merge closure was bad. That there is some evidence a subject has been discussed in RS does not perclude a merger; that is the point of WP:NOPAGE. With that being said I would have relisted in this case. Mach61 13:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
• Overturn to keep Those arguing for merge substantially present WP:JNN or WP:NOPAGE arguments without support, while those arguing for retaining the page as separate provided appropriate sources, including a WSJ. NOPAGE explains that we can choose not to cover a notable topic in its own page, and is among the weakest of p&g-based arguments, because there's no requirement or expectation that we do so. Jclemens (talk) 17:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Comment (independent of my role as closer): the WSJ article notably conflates the terms "woke" and "woke mind virus" throughout the piece. Rhododendrites and buidhe made related comments during the discussion. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Comment (as closer): I've looked back at my close and subsequent comments to Iljhgtn; I do not think my close was a supervote (my words were intended to reflect the overall consensus), but I think it could plausibly be read that way. I'll have to be more careful to phrase my closes carefully in the future. I think that underlying the issue here is that AfD may not have been the best venue to begin a discussion about the article; a merge proposal on the talk page might have been more successful in getting a clear consensus on whether 'woke' and 'woke mind virus' should be separate articles, as consensus is clear that they are (a) notable term(s) that Wikipedia should be covering in some way. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

  Just for the record, while I disagree with your close, I don't think it was unreasonable; I think you just gave too equal weight to some relatively week merge/redirect rationales. It's far from a tragedy if it appears as part of Woke. Jclemens (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Style and formatting

Template:Style wide [Disabled due to template transclusion limits]

Articles by quality

Template:Articles by Quality [Disabled due to template transclusion limits]

Wikipedia maintenance-related WikiProjects

See Category:Wikipedia WikiProjects for the complete list of Wikipedia maintenance-related projects.

• WT:WikiProject Spam
• WP:WikiProject on open proxies
• WP:WikiProject History Merge
• WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals

Other

Template:cent [Disabled due to template transclusion limits]

There's always lots of stuff to do everywhere!

• WP:Cleanup
• WP:Peer review
• WP:Editor review
• WP:Third opinion
• WP:Abuse response
• WP:Copyright problems
• WP:Sockpuppet investigations
• WP:Requests for undeletion
• WP:Requests for page importation
• WP:Paid editing (guideline)/Noticeboard
• WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Watchlist
• WP:Community portal/Opentask
• WP:Article Incubator/History
• WP:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom
• WP:In the news/Candidates
• WP:Edit filter/Requested
• WP:Edit filter/False positives/Reports
• WT:WHITELIST

• Category:Items pending OTRS confirmation of permission

• User talk:Jimbo Wales
• meta:IRC office hours